Printable View
Dan, as you may or may not know, Mdawg's great adventure thread at WoV was recently moved to the Losing betting systems / voodoo section.
While there is no such section here, I am wondering if there should be, just as you have a scams, scandal's and shadiness section at your PFA forum, where all the similar Christopher Mitchell baccarat bullshit resides. In the absence of creating a new section, perhaps some disclaimer placed on the Mdawg fairytale thread would be appropriate?
mcap was right.
You have a serious problem.
mickeycrimm was right about you too.
Rob Singer and MDawg live rent free in your head.
Might as well add Shack and QFIT to that list.
Yep, I do. I want the bullshit called out as bullshit. Always have, always will. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
Who the fuck cares what Dan does with the thread on this site? No offense meant, but I don't believe this forum gets nearly the outside traffic that WoV does.
Saying "no offense" before the offensive thing you say doesn't make it non offensive.
No offense, but you are ugly.
Whatever this forum may or may not be, I have always wanted to make it a better version of. Calling out scams and bullshit intending to mislead others is always a good start.
Question for Mr. Kewlj. Why haven’t you created this ideal forum yet, something like BlackjackFraudAlert?;)
I don't want to hear that. If there's one thing I know for sure, it is this: If I were gay, you would totally fuck me or get fucked by me, or both. It's not even a question. Unfortunately, for you, I'm not.
Anyway, that was just a nicety. It wasn't meant to be offensive and I don't think the comment was offensive, per se. WoV has been around longer, has cross-traffic coming from the massively popular WoO, has more posters, has more posts, has more views, has more members...etc. etc.
So, again, I was just being polite. I don't find stating something obvious offensive.
You are arguing that "size matters."
It shouldn't.
Whether a site has 100 viewers or a million, quality is always an issue.
What, just because this forum lacks the views of WoV it should become an online dumpster?
Does not compute.
That's not what I said. My point is that, assuming the main concern is the uninformed getting the wrong idea about betting systems, they are not likely to happen upon his thread (here) anyway. Lots of related search parameters on Google would have a WoO/WoV site as one of the first results-if not the first. Vegas Casino Talk, on the other hand, not really unless you put the word, "Vegas Talk," in the search.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Even searching, "Vegas Casino Baccarat System," you'd have to go further than Page 2---which is as far as I went---and Google knows I come here frequently.
It's interesting but if you Google the word
MDawg
the results come up repeatedly to this VCT forum, TruePassage forum, GamblingForums, but not to WOV, at least not at this moment. I believe the results have landed on WOV in the past.
If you Google
MDawg Vegas
then the WOV thread comes up. #1 result.
But all this presupposes that you know who MDawg is and would know to Google the word anyway. More likely that someone would just land on one of these forums and go to most recent posts. There may be only ten or so active members on this VCT site but hundreds of thousands have viewed the MDawg Adventures thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
I want to take a moment to thank kewlJ and MisterV and others for calling out the junk gambling information. If you guys didn't exist, God knows how much time and energy I would feel compelled to burn trying to make these forums better from a science/math-based viewpoint when the owners don't give a rat's ass. I really don't understand why the owners don't give a rat's ass, but maybe it's as Mission says -- upticks in viewing and forum value as tradeoffs for credibility and integrity. Capitalism, even meager capitalism, uber all.
The MDawg stuff is silly, but there are sillier things being spoon fed and believed by the American public. If you guys, DarkOz included, ever want me to look over some of the "agreements" regarding these "challenges," I'll do my best to point out the stress points, but there are people better than me. I worry about Shackleford, even on the up and up, shouldering the in-the-field observations. I think Axel said something to that effect, also. Shackleford does not, from superficial appearances, seem like a Jim Rockford spot-the-con guy. Maybe he is.
Thought about it, but the day has passed. Not enough interest in just blackjack and every gambling related OPEN forum has seen a transformation in the last 10 years. It is all about trolling. Even have trolls moving from forum to forum just to troll different people. Now the real gambling forums have moved underground. Private membership. Can't find them or view them using google.Quote:
Originally Posted by mcap
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission146
I have no clue what the fuck this means. Shouldn't even acknowledge it. It doesn't deserve acknowledgement.
It was a joke because I jokingly interpreted your comparative statement as actually calling me ugly. Loosen up!Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
With kewlJ you have to bring your own Kay Why.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission146
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfRQlGGAixUQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJQuote:
Originally Posted by Mission146
I have no clue what the fuck this means. Shouldn't even acknowledge it. It doesn't deserve acknowledgement.
This got ugly fast. I like it. Don't tell someone what to do, let me tell you what to do.
Unfortunately for women, for the world with your descendants, you're not gay yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission146