Originally Posted by
Dan Druff
Moses asked why kewlJ is doing this, and why he can't just keep his mouth shut, quietly win, and leave the casino policing to Nevada Gaming.
He also wonders what kewlJ feels he's accomplishing by posting his findings.
I have an answer for that.
Exposing things like this will only help players in the long run -- both APs and recs.
Why?
Let's take this situation.
Let's hypothetically say kewlJ has discovered something real, and the casino was cheating using a modified Shufflemaster.
At the very least, word will get back to the casino that they've been caught, and they will stop doing it, fearing consequences if they continue. At the most, this will get the attention of Gaming, and the casino will be punished for it.
Either way, the casino will have experienced a negative consequence from being caught cheating, and will think twice before attempting further shenanigans.
As I said before, even if this particular cheating instance is exploitable once discovered, the next incidence of cheating may not be exploitable or easily discoverable. I think it's absurd to advocate keeping casino cheating quiet for the good of APs. This only encourages future bad behavior.
Casinos are like any other business. They will bend and break the rules if it results in more profits, and will only cease or avoid such behavior when consequences loom. Facebook was selling our data for huge profits until the February 2018 scandal where much of this was exposed. Large industrial companies will heavily pollute the environment until such pollution is discovered and they are fined or threatened with other consequences. Large consumer companies will screw each consumer for a small amount of money until a class action lawsuit costs them $200 million. You get my point.
Publicizing suspected casino cheating is always a positive for all players.
I saw a comparison to the Uston case in New Jersey, and what it did to blackjack there. Indeed, the blackjack games declined in AC after Uston's case made it illegal for casinos there to back off players for counting. In response, the AC casinos simply made the game conditions unbeatable through counting.
However, this is a poor comparison. Backing players off isn't the casino cheating -- it's simply a form of combat against the AP. So, yes, it could be said that the elimination of the backoff made the game beatable for zero APs, whereas before the game was beatable for APs who had a good enough cover or system to where they weren't detected.
But reporting suspected cheating? That should be done every time, and the only ones who should be upset about it should be the casinos themselves.