I agree, I can be a sarcastic ass hole to those deserving of it.
Printable View
Yes, I do pick my toes once in awhile. But I do not snore, I don't own an easy chair I'm not lonely because I have 14 cats, my wife never left me we just don't live together and she's not witchy or cantankerous at all. So you got one right out of six. And everything I say about roulette is absolutely true.
I sort of like you and enjoy your antics EB/spike. BUT, if I really thought you were a threat to other people, like I believe both Singer and Mdawg have been when other players tried to emulate thir ridiculous claims, I would have said something, regardless that I might like you. I just don't feel your antics rise to that level.
As for trolling: You are definitely "playing with" Axelwolf and others at WoV with your claims of winning 80% at roulette and stuff. You are trying to get a rise out of them/ And you enjoy it when one of them crosses the line and gets suspended. You know what the definition of that is? Yep...trolling. So don't give me that "I am not a troll at all". :D
KJ, that's been Spike's game plan since the days of Gamblers Glen.
Same shit, different forums.
But he didn't used to post pics of cats and food: must be dementia kicking in.
You're older than I am you walking pile of dog excrement. I don't have you blocked here, not yet. The nearest I can figure it you've got to be at least 76 or 77 years old so don't tell me about dementia. How many times you get suspended and wov lately because you can't keep your demented mouth shut, you can't figure out how to make a post it's not going to be offensive. That's dementia.
Is this forum getting a What Did you Eat Today thread or something?
RIP
LOL
76 or 77?
Looks like you're as clueless at counting up years as you are at playing roulette.
As for me being suspended at WoV, I consider it an honor to "take one for the team" and I expect to get suspended.
You on the other hand get your cracker ass suspended due to clueless stupidity; you think you know just how far to push it in your game of brinkmanship but your getting suspended disproves such notions.
But I won't allow my contempt for you and your years of wasted words to negatively influence how I judge the quality of your posts on this forum: it's a new day, so don't fucking blow it.
What Mr. V said above about something like not allowing contempt for someone to cloud their judgement of their posts reminds me of when a bunch of Posters trashed a happy birthday thread I made. Posters trashed that happy birthday read so badly. Someone was like,"I actually LIKED the happy birthday thread Karen Nathan started and was just about to post positively in it, but I saw that Karen Nathan started it and I trashed it purely because I think she's a major Troll but I would have posted positively in it had anyone else started that thread. " Other Posters were like,"I also liked the happy birthday thread Karen Nathan started and was just about to post positively in it until I saw Karen Nathan started it and I trashed it instead because I think Karen Nathan is a major Troll." Other Posters were like,"I thought I was the only one who trashed a perfectly good Happy birthday thread just because Karen Nathan started it and I think Karen Nathan is a major Troll." Posters acknowledged that trashing a good thread just because I started it was a really messed up thing to do.
He didn't take nothin' for nobody and was over there at GF.com crying like a baby over being suspended unexpectedly.
OH, you must mean this limerick:
There is this guy in Vegas
Says "I'm giving up working for wages;
I'll take up AP
What fun it will be
Spewing fiction on these pages"
I never said I ENJOY being suspended, merely that I expected it.
But it was worth getting suspended, pointing out what a tool you really are.
You expected no suspension and continue to cry like a baby over the suspension. :D
https://i.imgur.com/AEFcDguh.jpg
Smoke some more MrV, and lie again about how you expected that suspension.
You really are an idiot, Dawg.
I posted that to clarify that YOU were the target of my jibe.
I mentioned no names, so yeah, he was remiss in suspending me, but I figured he would, if not for that one then for the next one.
You see, I too like to play games of brinkmanship, all in service of "taking out the trash."
It's okay to cry like a baby, V. But not to claim that you don't. And then cry.
Just like it's not OK to make grand claims of winning like you do, when in fact it's fiction.
Or is your entire life fiction?
V, is just like one of those sheep in Animal Farm who bleat, Four Legs Good, Two legs bad without knowing what he's even saying. He is UNKewlJ's sidekick and repeats everything that comes out of the UNKewl mouth. Ugh, quite a distasteful image actually.
Gentlemen, gentlemen, lend me your ears...
As for the dawg: didn't he originally yap about making shitloads of money, then take it back when the Wiz examined things?
I seem to recall him making claims as patently absurd as alan's "18 yo's in a row" about winning: what, about fifty winning sessions in a row?
The details escape me, but it was clearly bullshit as it defies both the math and common sense.
As for Rob: his claims have been discussed and debunked to my satisfaction by others.
I have no objective "proof" of my own, just as all good Christians, Muslims and Hindus have no proof that their "god" in fact exists.
Unlike religion I need not rely on faith: I let science and math be my guide.
It simply "Does not compute."
Could I be wrong?
Not bloody likely...
Hi, Spike
I like
I like to say
Hi Spike
I didn't pass the bar when I was twelve, but I did start college when I was 17.
Sure, I may have talked about cars I owned ('68 Camaro RS, '70 Challenger R/T, '95 Ferrari 456 GT to name a few}, that I grew up in NJ, and how I had a career as a shyster, but at no time did I state or imply I was born in or near the mid-1940's as that simply isn't correct.
Unlike some posters on these forums I don't have a history of lying about myself; whether you choose to believe me or choose to go down a rabbit hole is your choice.
I'm off today to gamble at Chinook Winds...were you to meet me there you'd eat your words, as I look hale and hearty for a 'boomer.
Quote: ams288
"What percentage of posts in this thread are pro-Sarah/Vic though?...
....But we are not about to go hand out $50 to see the victims’ titties."
Well, he sure isn't, but ams288 might goes check out Vic,s dick pics!
I never said you explicitly said it, I said the implication has to be from everything you've talked about from the 1970s and what you were doing could only have been done by somebody who was born in the mid40s. I see you're not denying it. You're saying you never said it which is not the same thing as saying it's not true. You are at least as old as I am and I was born in 1949 but I know you're a couple years older than that.
True narcissist are the ones who deny the existence of God. They fancy themselves to be so smart and righteous. They are in fact just complete morons. Their brain is so small that they can’t comprehend just how magnificently huge the universe is. Their faith is in people like dr Fauci , and Hunter Biden.
Wrong
Let me make it perfectly clear...I DENY the claim that I was born in the 1940's.
I affirmatively state that you are "at least" a few years older than I am.
In the interest of full disclosure, I did not buy the cars I mentioned above when they were new; the Camaro and Challenger had been beat to rat shit and the Ferrari was plagued with electricial issues.
Oh, so since we cannot quite explain everything you argue that god must exist?
LOL
Early humans constructed the notion of god because they couldn't fathom how the universe works, how it came to be: they also had a deep fear of death, of being nothing forever.
Today we have logical answers to most, but not all questions, via science.
Religious beliefs are irrelevant, or should be, except they've been politicized by their adherants.
I don't fear death so I need not construct an elaborate fairy tale about being judged and going to heaven or hell: complete bullshit.
Wake up and smell the science.
Bullshite, no way I believe that. I've been reading your crap since 2006 and there's no way that you're younger than me absolutely no way. You gave way too many hints that only somebody who's at least as old as I am would know. When did you turn into a petty tyrant, was it when you were still pulling wings off flies? Or do you still do that in your spare time. You will be longing for the days when I had you blocked and you could say any damn thing you wanted about me. Those days are over.
Try adding eight years to that and you're closer to the truth. 1946 or 47 at least. And please don't say ask people who've met him because people are really bad at determining somebody's age. I'm 74 and people tell me all the time I look like I'm not a day over 65. Just last week a lady said that to me. No they're not trying to be nice. And I constantly see men who look like they're in their late seventies and they're in their early 60s.
Not knowledgeable about V's age and neither do I care. My wife & I tried to meet him and invited him to dinner while we were on a visit in our muscle car to his state. He refused. But no way does a guy own a couple of muscle cars in past years, when he says he's always working on an old POS Volvo these days.
Makes sense now.
Lol.
Muscles.
Seems unlikely that someone is going to lie downward about their age from mid/late 70's to early 70's or even late 60's as Spike seems to be suggesting. :confused: But I don't get what difference it even makes how old MrV is? Spike and others may have been mislead because MrV has been saying he is retired for many years now. Who knows when he retired. A successful attorney could retire in his 50's or even presumably earlier if he was successful enough. Well.... unless that attorney has a gambling addiction and funnels all his money to the Las Vegas casinos in exchange for some free rooms. :rolleyes:
Is it just that Spike wants to claim that MrV is older so he can attack him on the grounds of mental capacity? Come on man!!! Don't we get enough of that in politics with one crazy old 77 year old dude attacking an 80 year old dude? :D
Anything kew posts now is basically irrelevant. He's a proven fraud and known compulsive liar, willing to say or claim anything that will make him feel better and/or sleep at night. Just check out his new bag of lies and make-believes in the sports betting thread. His only true believer is MrV, so if you present any unflattering facts or say anything that questions his truthfulness, kew will jump on you like a homo from NAMBLA swatting away young girls from their baby bro's.
Which brings me back to my original question? Why does it matter? If MrV is 77 or 78 as you claim, or 72, or 69...what does it matter?
I know you two go way back and have a long history of trolling each other. I mean you were both on the trolliest of troll forums, Gamblers Glen. :D
I just don't see this as anything but insignificant. But if it is important to you, by all means... continue.
It matters because he's older than me and making fun of me for my age makes him a goddamn hypocrite. That would seem obvious. Speaking of trolls, you have to be the trolliest troll of all time. You have trolled so many forums they can't be counted. Every gambling form I go to there you are trolling away. If you live in a glass house please don't throw stones.
Kew, you know you're a lying hypocrite so cease with the bullshit. You unsuccessfully try to discredit the older members here all the time because of their age. Yet you never comprehend the level of your own inexperience and foolishness because of the failed generation you reside within.
MrV has discredited himself because his pathetic liberal roots has led him to somehow tying himself to your lies. I'm assuming it's due to his warped sense of empathy for sick-headed gays. Nevertheless, it wouldn't be much of a stretch for him to be lying about his age to Spike. It's more than likely the reason he backed out of our invite to buy him dinner. Given that he's one of those addicts who can't stay away from Chinook Winds, the more I read from him the more I see an elderly out-of-shape diabetes-riddled fat guy trying to concoct some alternate forum reality about himself.
Book it.
LOL
Oh, really?
Let the games begin...
Well then, time for the ultimate advantage play: are ya ready, Spike / Even Bob / insignicant piece of shit on a plow handle?
As stated above, I will wager $100K that I was not born in the 1940's.
I will travel to sin city with my passport, birth certificate and license for Nersessian to see: hell Boob, you can look too...provided you prepay as I have proposed.
Hell, I'll even let you, the loser, shake my winning hand after I win the bet.
But you won't accept the bet, you're just a pussy...like the pics you post.
Hey, do you fuck your cats before you cook and photograph them?
You're a kinky old bastard, I'll grant you that.
Coach, your offer is a tad "ambiguous:" please state the specific terms of the wager you offer as well as the amount you are willing to bet, and I will respond.
I assume you are willing to bet that I was born in 1954 and that I graduated HS in 1972?
*sips coffee, pets blind, aged, senile cat*
I am willing to wager any amount that you require to settle the wager in person.
I am willing to bet anyone that my algorithm is correct...namely that you were born in 1954 & 1972 HS grad year.
Even money that I am correct within 1 year on both.
Loser pays me 2-1 that I am correct within 2 years on both.
Oh, a two year spread?
Not happening, I do not accept those terms, nor a bet including that range.
I'd only bet on a sure thing, i.e. were you willing to bet that I was born in 1954 and graduated HS in 1972 I'd take that bet, but not otherwise.
Meanwhile I'm waiting for Spike to weigh in, hat in hand, weaseling his way out...his mouth writes checks he can't cash.
Coach, are you willing to bet that I was born in one of those three years: '53, '54 or '55?
If I proved I was born in a year other than any of those three I'd win, but if not you'd win, correct?
AND I would get to name the bet amount?
Let's assume arguendo that I accept: what would you suggest be done to resolve the bet, given your desire to "settle the wager in person?"
I'll certainly listen to any proposal but given the amount of bullshit people have spewed on these forums I'd be reluctant to, hypothetically, agree to terms, travel to an agreed location and be stood up, or even worse, not get paid if I won.
Oh, where's Spike?
That jackoff is so cock-sure of himself you'd think he'd be all over the wager.
*crickets*
lest we forget...
What a fucking dildo this schmuck is.
The science you mean like prescribing cigarettes for throat problems in the 1920s lmao. How about the weed science lol yeah dumb fuck it’s totally safe for you. Or how about let’s follow the food pyramid and eat all those whole grains Lol. Yeah believe modern human science to explain GOD it’s totally been around for long enough. Billions of years right lol. GOD is outside of everything the known universe is made of. Simulation theory is basically nerds trying to cover all possible scenarios.
Imagine thinking modern science disproves the existence of god when they were giving people cigarettes for throat cancer not that long ago. Go smoke another “perfectly safe” bowl of weed loser
Literally if everyone lived by the Ten Commandments the world would be perfect. It’s not hard to comprehend. Instead we have Women who rather vote to kill their a16 week or 8 month old mold babies , and freaks like fraudJ licking the assholes of other men jerking off to not ever having a family. Yeah what a nice world we have with less Christianity.
V, try looking at your dilemma this way: if there weren't a God, an exceptional individual such as myself would not be here in the otherwise superior manner I am. All your personal weed-driven tribunals and rejectionist choices have no real explanation for the science that might even begin to dispute that.
Most educated, common sense-based folks understand that something beyond simple science has been going on here....and maybe not just "here" within the endless universe or even within billions of years. The inexplicable wonder of the human body; the millions upon millions of different species of life on this planet; the PERFECT ALIGNMENT and movements of our planet, our moon, and our sun (which is a bewildering and truly incomprehensible mass in it's own right); the precise temperature range needed across "Earth" to sustain all this life.....things like all this coming together in exquisite harmony just don't "happen out of the blue".
People like yourself have been trying to use "science" as an excuse to explain your reason for hopelessness both during your existence, as well as once your awareness ends the day your body stops its miraculous work. But just as believers cannot prove anything that would allow atheists and agnostics to see the light, neither are you people able to "explain it all away" with proof.
For believers, is God a being of some sort, a machine, a spiritual state of mind, a thought, or what? Of course, no believer has any real idea other than what they "hope" it to be. But you should be able to figure this much out--attempting to apply valid answers to questions like "how did time start, or was it always there?" and "how far out does space go, and is there some massive black whole or wall at the end of it and if so, what's on the other side of THAT?" and "if my parents never met, would this realization and awareness that I experience in the course of this "life" be the same if I were born to different parents?"
Conclusion: believers, while not ever able to offer any real proof of their belief, do apply extraordinary effort in order to be at peace with their hopes and beliefs. Atheists are lazy sons of bitches.
One more glimmer of wisdom for you MrV: are we to believe that our non-existence prior to our birth, is the same nothingness as what folks like you believe--that once our lives end we cease to exist period?
Somehow--and I am unable to elaborate--that scenario just doesn't square.
My rejection of orgainized religion is the culmination of being force-fed Catholic liturgy while growing up, and eventually concluding "WTF?"
The notions of Virgin Mary, angels, purgatory/original sin, holy ghost...all are wholly unsupported by FACT, and are actually only OPINION or BELIEF.
As a kid I didn't have the mental sophistication / world-view to seriously question these and other religious tenets, but as I hit my teens and developed my critical thinking skills I quickly concluded "This does not compute" and consigned it to the slag heap.
I later did discover zen Buddhism, or simply zen: I am not a Buddhist but I enjoy reading zen stories to help give me the clearest lens through which to live my life: see the link to "101 Zen Stories."
https://101-zen-stories.blogspot.com/
I recognize and have previously posted that there are fundamental things that boggle the mind and for which science has no satisfactory explanation, e.g.:
If matter cannot be created or destroyed, where did it come from?
Time: Logically it can have had no beginning: how can this be?
If there is a fundamental force, call it god if you will...where did it come from?
Deep, unanswered queries, yet I need not grasp a bearded, cloud-wrapped security blanket after asking them.
Anyone who has experience in the world knows that there is more out there than is dreamt of in your philosophy.
Non-believers just haven't had any spiritual or miraculous experiences is all.
Actually one (formerly non-believer) friend of mine had an experience after he was almost killed (was actually dead for a while) that brought him to tears just recounting it and in his case the physical evidence backed up his vision. What he saw didn't have anything to do with an afterlife per se (other than that he did see something) but to do with things that he could not have seen normally and went beyond the walls where he was physically confined in the emergency room. An out of body experience that was backed up by hard evidence.
In general non-believers think everything inexplicable happens/happened randomly / by chance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJ-y3kDkF6w
But what GOOD is religion in the world?
All it has ever led to is WAR.
Muslim v Jew currently.
Most wars have been fought over religion, i.e."My invisible being is the only real one, yours is a sham...die, infidel dog."
Stupid, stupid, stupid.
Lol! Typical flimflam man scam, say you'll wager an obscene amount of money over something trivial and stupid knowing that nobody in their right mind would take you up on it and think you're making a point. The point you're making is you don't ever want to meet anyone and you sure as hell don't want anyone to know what your true age is. The circumstantial evidence you've posted over the years definitively points to you being in your mid to late seventies. Case closed.
He went to those Wov Cons