Dotty's has/had some good VP.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Printable View
Dotty's has/had some good VP.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
When you're caught yet again lying, or caught yet again saying something that inadvertently supports what everyone has already been saying about you, just revert to trying to make it seem like people are victimizing you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by misterv
The tunnel dwellers do like to shower in the Longhorn bathroom sinks. :cool:
Maybe you got a free sink bath for playing 10 hands of red.
FraudJ stopped immediately responding because he's busy searching the internet to find $50 of value in a Longhorn blackjack promo from the past...:cool:
I made a more than fair proposal to you Mdawg. You release Wizard from the NDA and allow his to say what he thinks and answer questions from Axelwolf and others and I would prove some of the things you people lie about to Dan Druff. Something I am opposed to in principle. I don't know what could be more fair.
And here I will make another. You release Wizard from the NDA, so the man regarded as an expert can say what he thinks and answer questions, and I will join you on a podcast with Wizard and Axelwolf and we can all question one another and just see who knows what they are talking about and who doesn't.
I won't hold my breath. Either of these would unmask you to the point that this 5 year scam and that is what it is...would be over.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Notice how this bullshitter can't and won't accept either of these challenges and instead just responds with more trolling.
What a piece of work.
So, back to the "he smokes pot so disregard anything he says" angle, eh?Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Weak, dawg, very weak.
I managed to put together a successful law practice and am now enjoying a successful retirement, all while puffing away at home on a regular basis.
I'm still on the weed wagon, having put down the pipe earlier this month; I plan to start blazing again tomorrow night, seeking visions of Santa and sugar plums.
A stiff, hidebound soul such as you seem to be should try cannabis...it might chill you out a bit and make you more of a pleasant person.
Quote:
Originally Posted by misterv
Weed can't help this person MrV. Mdawg is an insecure, small man. he may have some money, probably not nearly what he portrays. He tells stories that build himself up to something he is not and then bullies anyone who dare challenge him. He talks about mental illness a lot and I would bet that is from experience. I am sure many times in his life he has heard the word narcissist used to describe him by professionals.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
He is growing angrier and nastier by the day. I am not sure what he has to be so bitter about, but he is.
Oh it's another long running, let's feed UNKewlJ his own hypocritical lies, afternoon....
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
You'd think that something unusual (like burning extra cards) would show up in the detailed and comprehensive notes that he compiled throughout his career.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Yes KJ, that is true, but I think weed could be transformative to a guy like that.
I can just envision him in a tie-dyed shirt, puffing on a bong, with bags of Chee-tos and Oreos at hand, listening to The Dead sing "Friend of the Devil."
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
What's stopping you or anyone else from asking as many questions as you want right here?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Mdawg doesn't answer legit questions from me, or Axelwolf or anyone else. He just trolls and calls people homeless and drunks and drug addicts.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyWhat's stopping you or anyone else from asking as many questions as you want right here?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
You ARE homeless and V IS an addict/alcoholic.
But that has nothing directly to do with being a sociopathic liar.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
I'm certainly no expert in all the moves one can make and Baccarat other stuff that's not well known.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
There's only one question: Explain exactly where your advantage comes from and how is that information obtained.
There's a possibility that MD has a slight advantage in baccarat if you include lost rebates, tournaments, free bets RFB Etc. MD claims to be a good Tipper and has given examples. If that's the case that should be eating up any significant portion of all those perks. Even if the perks were above and beyond the ha and the Tipping, that certainly wouldn't explain the highly unusual win rates on the games that he claims.
If one had a particular move such as perfect information on the next card or whatever, I find it highly unusual that someone would be peacocking around the casinos and then bragging about how much they are winning online.
In Mike's original post related to his witnessing of MDawgs play I believe Mike indicated there's a possibility of a small advantage.
I assume Mike is doing the math related to the HA in Baccarat and then thinking about possible perks such as comps RFB, tournaments free bets Etc and if you included that depending on the value of those things one might have a slight advantage.
If I recall correctly, later Mike accidentally posted something that indicated he didn't notice anything unusual or different about MDawgs play that would create any significant advantage. Basically, it seemed like Mike was saying, there's nothing special to see here.
Obviously, that's not something MDawg wants people to know or think, therefore he had Mike remove the post on the grounds of breaching the NDA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfI'm certainly no expert in all the moves one can make and Baccarat there are lots of things going on that most everyone doesn't know.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
There's only one question: Explain exactly where your advantage comes from and how is that information obtained.
There's a possibility that MD has a slight advantage in baccarat if you include lost rebates, tournaments, free bets RFB Etc. MD claims to be a good Tipper and has given examples. If that's the case that should be eating up any significant portion of all those perks. Even if the perks were above and beyond the ha and the Tipping, that certainly wouldn't explain the highly unusual win rates on the games that he claims.
If one had a particular move such as perfect information on the next card or whatever, I find it highly unusual that someone would be peacocking around the casinos and then bragging about how much they are winning online.
In Mike's original post related to his witnessing of MDawgs play I believe Mike indicated there's a possibility of a small advantage.
I assume Mike is doing the math related to the HA in Baccarat and then thinking about possible perks such as comps RFB, tournaments free bets Etc and if you included that depending on the value of those things one might have a slight advantage.
If I recall correctly, later Mike accidentally posted something that indicated he didn't notice anything unusual or different about MDawgs play that would create any significant advantage. Basically, it seemed like Mike was saying, there's nothing special to see here.
Obviously, that's not something MDawg wants people to know or think, therefore he had Mike remove the post on the grounds of breaching the NDA.
Unfortunately, you have to assume that anything Wizard is recollecting that is more than a short period of time ago is flawed. He has said so himself, that his memory has gotten to where he can't even remember a few digit lock combination. So by the time he posted anything that was violative of the NDA he couldn't have remembered anything that happened, and he certainly could not today.
As a lawyer, I simply stepped up to have the violation of the NDA retracted, it wouldn't have mattered to me if he had posted that MDawg was doing this, or he was doing that, I would have asked for a retraction regardless.
Which is why, as far as this ridiculous UNKewlJ challenge (the way it would work is...if anyone did whatever first, he'd just renege on his end anyway, as usual), if I were to free Wizard from the NDA he wouldn't even remember any of what happened that day over two years ago anyway. So if I wanted to call UNKewlJ's bluff and play games with him I would say, sure, let Wizard speak...but guaranteed he'd have nothing substantive to say, his recollection of that day would be a nearly blank page. All he could do is maybe say something in general about the game of Baccarat.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackhole
But I know that even offering something as worthless as freeing a man to speak on something of which he has no recollection, still wouldn't get anything in return from that fraud, so I just say...let him show his cards first to prove that he'll even perform. He won't, ever.
I had an NDA in place on the chance that Wizard might have detected what I was really up to. If you read the description of my play that day you'll note for example that there was just one run in that entire shoe and I won every hand in the run, not just some, not just a few, but all. I caught the first hand of the only run in the shoe, and the last. How did I do that? What are the odds that was random?
Also there was no martingale going on. After losing a hand I was just as likely to lower my bet. That session ended up just like the many others I have described - a winner. It was no anomaly.
I reject the lost rebate angle. I am not going to look it up, but the only time Mdawg suggested anything about a loss rebate was at WoV several years ago, when you brought up loss rebate. Mdawg responded with something like "yeah that is what I am doing". he didn't come up with that on his own and it simply doesn't fit with his claims and all the winning. The advantage from a loss rebate occurs when the player records a losing session....something Mdawg never does, or never repots to us anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
We all know of the small advantage a player can get at baccarat on specific hands and situations. 6that does not translate to longterm +EV and every baccarat player claiming it does is full of nonsense. EvenBob type nonsense.
I know exactly what Wizard said that he had to retract. You are right, it destroys Mdawgs whole story. Wizard should be allowed to give his opinion. It is ridiculous that he can't. It has been 5 years of this shit now.
It is possible to b eat baccarats to the tune of about 1.2+ units nets profits per shoe, long terms. On top of that you can also take advantage of losses rebates, non-negotiable rolling chips program, show up money and other inducement. Also, most joint think that baccarats can't be beat so minimal scrutinies and little chance of the backs-off, hey hey.
Soxfan, Have you read Mdawgs accounts and claims? he has posted reports from about 1000 days of play over the past 5 years. 200 days a year. and 90% (maybe more) are winning sessions. Totaling winnings in the millions.Quote:
Originally Posted by soxfan
So loss rebate doesn't enter into the equation. He rarely posts of any losses and that is where the advantage from loss rebate kicks in...on losses. plus he never mentioned loss rebates until Axelwolf brought it up.
Winning 90+% of sessions sounds like a progression wagering system. Which is pretty much what he alluded to early on, saying stupid shit like a big bankroll could guarantee winnings. Now we all know how progression wagering works. 90% winning sessions would be very possible. BUT, every once in a while there is that huge loss that wipes away all those winnings plus some.
So Mdawg is either not telling us about that huge loss every once in a while, or lying about all the winning. It is one or the other.
AND casinos do not comp high end suites for 1000 nights over 5 years to a player that is winning millions over that time as Mdawg claims. But a casino does give handsome comps to a losing player. One way or another he is not telling us about the losses. :rolleyes:
And I suspect he is counting all the marked up, over priced comps as money. A $2000 a night suite does not count as winning cash of $2000. A lot of ploppy, -Ev players do this to justify to themselves or wives. That is just nonsense.
So you read at least some of Mdawgs 5 year claims on multiple sites and then get back to me. Fair?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobSinger
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Still raising that flag to see if anyone salutes, eh?
Party on, Garth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cxq53_ZkmZc
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgCome on mang, you've been ingesting one mind altering substance or another almost every day of your life since you were 15, if you're not an addict who is?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
V, why in the world would mdawg care about him being labeled an AP or not being labeled as such? Sure kew cares about that type of labeling, but that's because it's all part of his fabricated online life. Bottom line in this saga is who has the money and who doesn't. We certainly know that answer. And if kew doesn't want it to be that someone is Ritchie Rich and brags about it--or if someone has had him and his concoctions pegged from the get-go and announces millions in winnings like myself--kew will do what he does best: lie and lie and lie until he's twisted the truth around in his already sick & warped mind.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
LOL
And that is what irks the dawg so...not only have you had him pegged as a bullshitter from the get go, he now realizes that he's a ploppy whereas you are an AP.
His ego won't stand for it, so he flames you, hoping that doing so will make him feel better...nope...epic fail.
Keep up tugging the dawg's tail, it's a hoot to watch him bark in response.
The reason kew is so obsessed with mdawg's stated winning is plain as day: he abhors the fact that the forum communities all agree the guy is a wealthy individual. And whenever kew whines about it and says "he's using inherited money" that's nothing more than verification of his jealousy over mdawg.
I love how mdawg continually pours salt into kew's wounds by telling detailed stories about how he goes about his winning. It puts kew on tilt, because all the bj books he reads and all the posts he reads tell him it's possible but not probable. Of course, kew bypassed those facts since they make him and his gizzard uneasy, and instead claims it's impossible. And this---from a phony who rarely ever plays and when he does, it's at the low levels he's been seen playing at by other members.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Axelwolf is right. I do have Autism, which is why I behave the off way I do. And why I took my banning from WOV so seriously when MANY people would have been like,"Oh well, WOV is just another Website, who cares if I'm banned. "
Well I know of autistics who function quite well actually.
Now it's time for UNKewlJ to step up too, and admit what everyone already knows about him - that he's not only a fraud but mentally ill.
You seem to function pretty well overall.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
You don’t seem much more off than many of the other folks around here.
I recall arguing, with one of the regulars at English Stackexchange, about having autism, or, not having it. He argued that there's a bit of it in all of us, which is the societal view to drum up funding for it. However, from my brief research on line, it does seem that one can't be a bit autistic. Anyway, no point in arguing with a regular of a large forum. They just keep talking until the other regulars shut you down.
https://i.imgur.com/bFvGaBo.jpg
A sign saying, Please date me.
"Body shaming" now, are ya, dawg?
Wow, a new low...even for you.
But what isn't new is the reason. At one time Poker Grinder publicly expressed doubt about Mdawg and his gambling claims. And that immediately put him on the same list as several dozen others that Mdawg attacks in anyway he can think of.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Wealthy, or not wealthy, or wealthy to some degree (less than he wants people to think), it looks very similar to another insecure old "orange" dude I saw on the TV last night. :D
I would say this is an illness of the wealthy, but then there is Rob Singer. :D
But it is most definitely an illness of insecure people.
V, you just need to accept that you have no idea what's going on. Anywhere.
What is that comment supposed to mean?Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
You keep trying to "figure out" what is happening or happened behind the scenes (here, there, everywhere), and then interpreting forum rules to boot.
No one knows! No one knows!
And as a lawyer you should know that it's not always about who is right but who makes the best argument.
Orange Dude is going to be your next president.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJBut what isn't new is the reason. At one time Poker Grinder publicly expressed doubt about Mdawg and his gambling claims. And that immediately put him on the same list as several dozen others that Mdawg attacks in anyway he can think of.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Wealthy, or not wealthy, or wealthy to some degree (less than he wants people to think), it looks very similar to another insecure old "orange" dude I saw on the TV last night. :D
I would say this is an illness of the wealthy, but then there is Rob Singer. :D
But it is most definitely an illness of insecure people.
I don't think so mickey. If you really believe that you can get better than even money on him. My money....all $10 that I have wagered on the election so far is on Glenn Youngkin @ 300-1. :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
And I don't think Biden will be the Democratic nominee either come fall. I would have liked to place a similar type bet on Gavin Newsome, but he is only at 7 or 8-1, which is suspiciously low.
I don't think Trump looks very well right now (neither does Biden). But it is kind of new for Trump. He looks, tired, maybe ill. Looks like he just isn't even in it to me. To use a term he used on Jeb, Donald looks very low energy right now. Maybe that is even understandable. He has a lot of things going on. I think it is wearing on him.
Probably true only of the universe, itself, in the sense that it has nothing to compare itself to, ie, no right, or wrong, way to proceed except to be what it has to be. Yet, we try to solve it with math, and physics, and, so on. It doesn't care what we think.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Unfortunately kew you have a well documented history of telling us how you want things to be rather than how or what they really are.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI don't think so mickey. If you really believe that you can get better than even money on him. My money....all $10 that I have wagered on the election so far is on Glenn Youngkin @ 300-1. :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
And I don't think Biden will be the Democratic nominee either come fall. I would have liked to place a similar type bet on Gavin Newsome, but he is only at 7 or 8-1, which is suspiciously low.
I don't think Trump looks very well right now (neither does Biden). But it is kind of new for Trump. He looks, tired, maybe ill. Looks like he just isn't even in it to me. To use a term he used on Jeb, Donald looks very low energy right now. Maybe that is even understandable. He has a lot of things going on. I think it is wearing on him.
Even MrV on his myriad of drugs can see a world of difference between a lost & feeble, doddling Biden and the energizer bunny that is Trump. I'd even bet Trump would run circles around a couch potato like yourself. :) The guy is a marvel of energy, which is one thing we all really like about him. Running between court cases, campaign events, media appearances, etc. day in and day out....those are the type things he does that irk the hell out of go-nowhere/do-nothings like you.
This year's gonna be one big beautiful show of waiting for snd watching all you Trump haters squirm as he gets closer and closer and closer to the presidency again. In fact, it's even worth watching MSNBC right now, as that ugly dike Rachel Maddow is already coming apart at the seams over the realization about Trump.
And why do you queer people need to lie so much? Don't you have enuf self-caused problems already?
You know what is going to be a "big Beautiful show", Rob? The day that is coming in the next week or two when the Verdict in New York is read and the Orange Man is fined 400 MILLION DOLLARS and has someone not named Trump placed in charge of his businesses. THAT will be a fun day! And I don't say that because I don't like his politics. I say that because the man has cheated and stolen his entire life.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerUnfortunately kew you have a well documented history of telling us how you want things to be rather than how or what they really are.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI don't think so mickey. If you really believe that you can get better than even money on him. My money....all $10 that I have wagered on the election so far is on Glenn Youngkin @ 300-1. :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
And I don't think Biden will be the Democratic nominee either come fall. I would have liked to place a similar type bet on Gavin Newsome, but he is only at 7 or 8-1, which is suspiciously low.
I don't think Trump looks very well right now (neither does Biden). But it is kind of new for Trump. He looks, tired, maybe ill. Looks like he just isn't even in it to me. To use a term he used on Jeb, Donald looks very low energy right now. Maybe that is even understandable. He has a lot of things going on. I think it is wearing on him.
Even MrV on his myriad of drugs can see a world of difference between a lost & feeble, doddling Biden and the energizer bunny that is Trump. I'd even bet Trump would run circles around a couch potato like yourself. :) The guy is a marvel of energy, which is one thing we all really like about him. Running between court cases, campaign events, media appearances, etc. day in and day out....those are the type things he does that irk the hell out of go-nowhere/do-nothings like you.
This year's gonna be one big beautiful show of waiting for snd watching all you Trump haters squirm as he gets closer and closer and closer to the presidency again. In fact, it's even worth watching MSNBC right now, as that ugly dike Rachel Maddow is already coming apart at the seams over the realization about Trump.
And why do you queer people need to lie so much? Don't you have enuf self-caused problems already?
It cracks me up how Rob, with his infantile brain thinks he is hurting me by attacking Rachel Maddow. Just as he used to think the same when he said shit about Don Lemon. News Flash Rob: I am not a Rachel Maddow fan. I don't watch her. She is too far to the left for me. When is she on Monday's at 6pm (Vegas time)? I am usually watching sports, MNF or basketball.
And Rob, I really could care less what some geriatric African-Italian guy like you thinks about me or anyone else. :D
And for the record Rachel Maddow is not ugly. Yes, she is very dyke looking. I think that is her intent. But she is a fairly good looking woman, especially for 50. I also don't think she is doing too well health-wise. I saw her for a few minutes a couple times I checked in election night this week and she didn't look good or right to me.
I'm left of Marx on most things. Having said that, I think:
1) Trump will win if nobody poisons or shoots him.
2) Maddow should have fallen on her sword after some of her Covid comments/declarations early in the pandemic. She was irresponsibly, loudly, and completely wrong on most key elements of Covid and never came clean with a public mea culpa. Her handling of the most important story in recent times was so flawed that she should just have retired.
3) I will personally pay a hundred bucks to see a debate between Trump and Biden every week. It should be a weekly show. Advertisers would pay a fortune. Trump could misread a bunch of cue cards while Biden struggles with his earpiece and which way is off the stage. It'll be like watching a WWE wrestler arguing with Bernie from Weekend at Bernie's.
Robert thinks Trump is Superman; if so, age is his Kryptonite, same as Biden.
None of us are getting any younger.
Both have deteriorated since they first met in 2016: the change is obvious.
Both mispronounce and seem a bit "lost."
Their faces look much more ancient and tired.
Trump wanders like he's on dope during campaign events.
Is this a great country, or what?
Vote Libertarian.
Are those the only two possibilities, Red? In Russia which Trump is so obsessed with, prominent people meet their demise by "falling" out windows of high-rises or because their airplane mysteriously blew up. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Trump will lose a two person race against anyone....even Biden. Even a post stroke type Joe Biden in a wheelchair on oxygen. This isn't about Trump, nor is it about Biden. It is about the independents that decide most elections. Trump got his share of them in 2016 when the other candidate Hillary, was even less apealing to independents. He didn't get his share in 2020. And he has lost even more since. Almost all.
A big block of this independent group is women, specifically suburban women. They are not for Trump and nothing will bring them back. Things like Trump being convicted of sexual assault of a woman 20 years ago, may not matter to MAGA world. Maybe not even matter to most voters. But guess who that does matter to? Suburban independent women. :rolleyes:
But that isn't even the big problem. The Dobbs ruling (overturning Roe v Wade) and working to get the judges on the supreme court to make that ruling was the stupidest thing the republican ever did. Ever heard that saying "be careful what you wish for"? The Republicans are on the wrong side of abortion by a 2-1 margin. It isn't a big or top issue for me, but it is for enough women that it will absolutely kill the republicans.
It already has in EVERY election since the ruling. 2022 midterms and about 8-10 special elections, republicans have lost and underperformed since that ruling. Even 3 very red states like Kentucky and Ohio where abortion was on the ballot, they lost big. It was such a stupid thing because it was so much better for republicans when abortion was THEIR issue for 50 years, energizing their base. Now they have poked the bear, that is suburban woman. That is a fatal "poke".
The only possible chance Trump has at winning this election would be if Biden passed away or dropped out and the dems handed the nomination to Kamala Harris. I don't think they would do that. I think it would be someone else. That is why Gavin Newsome is only at 7-1 for this election.
The second possibility of a Trump win would be if their was a strong 3rd party taking significant vote. And I mean significant. Like Ross Perot type numbers of 19%. 15% at the very least. I know No-Names is on the horizon. I don't think they will be able to pull off that much vote and without knowing exactly who would be on their ticket, we can't even calculate whether it would hurt Biden or Trump more. But something like that is the only way Trumps 40% (maybe lower) support in a General election would be enough. If It is head to head, Trump is going to get smoked the likes of a Bob Dole.
You will get the selected candidate from the selected ones provided to you for the show. If any of it mattered you wouldn't even be allowed to pretend vote. So why argue about it?
Vote with your actions and how you live your life. Only a fool thinks he/she makes a difference...RIP
Isn't that part of Nickki Haley's argument? A couple hundred voters from 2 small states have voted on picking their candidate so far. Shouldn't more have some sort of reasonable say? She doesn't have a chance in hell with Trump owning the republican party like he does, but should we at least go through the motions of people having their say?Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
I attended the republican caucuses here in Nevada 8 years ago in 2016. Caucuses are a joke anyway as you have to spend hours, listen to speeches and then vote by moving over to the area that each candidates' supporters go to. And then guess what? If a candidate didn't have enough supporters, like 15%, you had to go pick a second choice. What kind of nonsense is that? They are limiting or telling you who you can pick.
And then after the first two primary/caucuses, you have winner takes all. Delegates should be handed out proportionately. You get 40% of the vote, you get 40% of delegates. If you get 20% of vote you should get 20% of delegates. And after everyone has voted if someone has enough delegates they are the nominee. If no one has enough, that is where it gets interesting. Or used to :D
Now we just have some billionaires on both sides providing the money for a candidate to win one or two small states that a tenth of 1% decides who will be running.
Totally fucked up system we have all around.
Rachel Maddow is uglier than a mud fence.
In 2020 Trump lost the swing states that decided the election by about 2 tenths of 1 percent. Immigration and the economy are the two biggest issues this time around. Trump smokes Biden on those two issues. Independents are breaking hard for Trump. People that never voted for Trump are now saying they will vote for him. He's probably going to carry some blue states.
Protecting unborn babies from being murdered is not the "wrong side of the issue." But Roe V. Wade did not outlaw abortion. It simply sent the issue back to the states to make their own laws.
Trump's much calmer demeanor is all an act. He's been advised he needs to tone it down, stick to the issues, and quit poking fun at the idiot opposition.
Trump is crushing Biden in the polls. Wake up and smell the coffee, KJ. Trump will be your next president.
Rachel Maddow isn't ugly. She just looks kind of masculine. Which makes sense judging by the fact that she's a Lesbian. Many Lesbians tend to look masculine.
But, electing dictators removes any thus Earthly hope.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Hit1der
I'm more or less at this point. Or just support libertarian or green party.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Any one who thinks Maddow is straight up ugly is a latent homo. Plenty of pictures out there otherwise. I don't mind short hair at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
To be fair, Rachel is a homosexual herself.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionAny one who thinks Maddow is straight up ugly is a latent homo. Plenty of pictures out there otherwise. I don't mind short hair at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
Yeah, this whole Trump thing is an enigma in a puzzle wrapped up in a riddle for a bow. Ha. In America. So strange.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don PerignomQuote:
Originally Posted by 1Hit1der
Trump will be a dictator!Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Hit1der
I'm over at the Wizard's now, to copy a few of theGrimReaper13's posts. My thus last post was political.
Quote:
Member Type: Restricted User
Join Date: September 25, 2015
Last Visit: June 11, 2016
Statistics
Threads Started: None
Posts Made: 216 View posts made by TheGrimReaper13
Blog Posts: None
Comments Made: 2 View TheGrimReaper13's comments
Quote:
Hump Trillary.
Now I wonder that there's one to do with Biden, and Trump.
Best I can do is, "Bump T. Riden". Not too shabby. Ha.
Not surprisingly, the Biden-Trump letters go to DP Burn Time, as the time it took DP to come up with a new avatar, instead of the Chinese guy on the phone.
If you rotate my avatar 90 degrees left, and then 270 degrees right, the 9 looks like a 6.Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Hit1der
I didn't even plan it that way.
Nor did, say, Tasha, or Max, plan on it, but, it always seem to work out that way.
amounts to 1183 = 13^2 * 7 ---> 137, like 1183 ---> 1/183 with 183 = (1 * √9 * 61) ---> 1961, and, day-183 as 2 July.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
amounts to (20445.05 / 1.5) = 13 630.0333 ---> (1√96√9*10 + 0.0333) ---> 1961_1691__333, with 3*3*3 = (-10 + 37) ---> 137, or, 3*3*3 = 27 ---> 2/7.
Just went over and read all the shit happening on WOV this past week. BBB is no longer in green and says she's through with the forum because Nathan is back. I remember how heavy handed she was with Nathan. Mission had no problem with Nathan but Babs was on her ass constantly. She was always bullying her. I thought Nathan did quite the job of not responding in kind as long as she did. It took a long time but Nathan finally fired back at her. One post of that kind was all it took for Babs to declare a lifetime ban. Chickenshit.
How you fared with Babs depended on your politics. Her pet libtards got mild suspensions Ryan alone got 3-day suspensions like 7 or 8 times in a row. But she martingaled the shit out of non libtards.
Babs went bully as hell on AZDuffman because he consistently out debated here. I could see her getting madder and madder with every post.
If you recall she was reprimanded by Shack for bullying people. She never admitted any wrongdoing. Just said she "heard what he said."
I think what did Babs in was her getting angrier and angrier at the debunking of her irrational political beliefs. She got herself into a position where she couldn't save face.
My idea was to put a bunch of seating areas and chairs in front of the voting places. That way, women would still technically be allowed to vote, but they'd never actually reach the booth because they always have to sit down.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I don't know too much about how WOV is run but have had experience on other kinds of forums. Did it every occur to anyone that admins should not even be debating anything with other posters?? They should be doing their admin job and staying as neutral as possible, and that's hard to do when you start getting your personal feelings/positions wrapped up into forum content.
I think that you meant women in management, and other critical, positions, who have to sit down, and guffaw with each other about totally irrelevant stuff. Ha.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
Are those posts deleted or left there with the bans? I'm curious what Tasha told her to piss her off. This woman sounds as deranged as our locals. It is amazing to me how many bans and such goes on at that site. It is kinda needed to keep things on target but still ....Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Recap here:Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post162832
The actual post, with reply from BBB.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/info.../2/#post720739
I think, by that point, Tasha was more famous than the Wizard, and, so, they had to get rid of her.
Thanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Hit1der
Incidentally, if Vegas is hotter than South Florida in winter, I need to cancel my move to Miami.
We've had TDS, Trump Derangement Syndrome, take over the minds of quite a few people.
Now we have NDS, Nathan Derangement Syndrome, taking over WoV. Since politics is not allowed at WoV, the people suffering from TDS can't post their opinions of Trump. Their bile has been backing up in their guts but now they have Nathan back and they have a chance to spew. I would bet that TDS is very common among the mods.
BBB is like a lot of middle aged women. Their beloved Hillary was beaten by Trump and TDS has warped their personalities in areas other than politics. I know several women with this type of behavior.
Could be vaxx side effects too.....RIP :DQuote:
Originally Posted by cyberbabble
South Florida is def warmer than Vegas in the winter. I grew up in Daytona, mid way up Flordia's coast and that is warmer than Vegas in Winter. Vegas isn't all that warm. Dec and Jan average highs are 59/60. Flordia it is 70's.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don PerignomThanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Hit1der
Incidentally, if Vegas is hotter than South Florida in winter, I need to cancel my move to Miami.
It is summer that Vegas and desert areas get hotter. But it's a dry heat for what that is worth. :cool: I make light of that, but 110 dry heat is way better than 95 humid shit, at least in my opinion.
More proof that seedvalue unearthed the fraud!Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
It would be difficult to get Admins who want to do the job, at least on certain types of forums, if the stipulation in doing so was that you functionally couldn't participate on the forum in any other way.Quote:
Originally Posted by jdog
I'd say that a person would just want to avoid banning anyone for a discussion in which they are directly involved/something said to them and could have a different Admin look at it. For my part, it's pretty well-known that I specifically directed other Administrators (when I was one) NOT to ban someone for something they said directly to me and me alone.
Of course, it can sometimes be appropriate to remove yourself from certain threads. I believe there was a point where the impartiality of my moderation was questioned vis-a-vis political leanings, so I just said I wouldn't moderate/participate in the main politics thread whatsoever unless someone specifically complained about an infraction.
I also would say it's upon Admins to, in fact, Administrate with impartiality. I think perfectly avoiding even the appearance of partiality, while a worthy goal to aspire to, is a pretty big ask when someone is doing something for free.
You're welcome.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don PerignomThanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Hit1der
Incidentally, if Vegas is hotter than South Florida in winter, I need to cancel my move to Miami.
Incidentally, I spent most of my life in the Kitchener-Waterloo area. Migrated to Windsor, about 210 miles up the road, for about twelve years, but, things eventually brought us back here. Windsor is in its own little biosphere with the most "growing days", in Canada, a year, which is an agricultural term for a lot of sunshine, ie, hot summers, and, winters without much snow if at all. I think that Kitchener must be at the other other extreme, with a lot of overcast days although not nearly so much rain as in past decades. Can't get lost in Windsor because there are only a handful of crooked roads. In Kitchener, it's hard to find a straight one. Lived temporarily in a few big cities, but, it's not for me.
Here's some food for thought: Portland is pretty close to the Pacific ocean, nestled in the Willamette River valley, and has a reputation for a moderate climate; snow is fairly uncommon and the temperature is usually quite comfortable year round due to the moderating effect of the ocean.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
BUT during the heat dome in June, 2021 Portland came within ONE DEGREE of tying the highest temperature ever recorded in Las Vegas.
LV: 117
Portland: 116
Two solid days of skiing later, I notice that over at WOV MrV is still crying like a baby over his latest suspension.
Funny how a week ago I was in Tahoe, skiing, and he whined after he got suspended, even created a whole thread over here to complain about it, and a week later, still in Tahoe, still skiing, he's still crying like a baby.
What he should concentrate on is refining his powers of concentration, firstly - by getting off the dope (bad stuff, fries the brain). Secondly, by improving reading concentration. Even a doctor, and doctors are notorious for not just poor penmanship but poor writing skills, outdid him in gathering the meaning from a simple Nathan post.
https://i.imgur.com/wlqy2ALh.jpg