The end.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jdog

Exactly. How can you slander an anonymous poster on an internet forum?? There is no legal issue to pursue.

---

I don't believe this is true. What is needed is to prove financial damage and I can do that from Mdawgs doxing. yes, I wouldn't be able to remain anonymous when filing a claim like this as I have tried and wanted to do on the forum. But most people would be willing to give up some anonymity for a piece of the middle-eastern oil money. :rolleyes:

Luckily for Mdawg, I am not most people. That is just not how I fly, so he doesn't have to worry about that. And me saying that probably wouldn't make me a very good poker player. Just being truthful. I am not going to sue. But some day, someone might. And I believe they would have a case if they can prove financial damages.

Have you not followed the Trump verdicts in this Caroll woman case? You just can't lie and make up things about people. It is called slander and you can be held liable.

---

So your idea is you can add the purported damages from the doxing to the purported libel of the gay prostitution?

Why not add in the damages form the guy that purportedly gave you a black eye?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jdog

Exactly. How can you slander an anonymous poster on an internet forum?? There is no legal issue to pursue.

---

I don't believe this is true. What is needed is to prove financial damage and I can do that from Mdawgs doxing. yes, I wouldn't be able to remain anonymous when filing a claim like this as I have tried and wanted to do on the forum. But most people would be willing to give up some anonymity for a piece of the middle-eastern oil money. :rolleyes:

Luckily for Mdawg, I am not most people. That is just not how I fly, so he doesn't have to worry about that. And me saying that probably wouldn't make me a very good poker player. Just being truthful. I am not going to sue. But some day, someone might. And I believe they would have a case if they can prove financial damages.

Have you not followed the Trump verdicts in this Caroll woman case? You just can't lie and make up things about people. It is called slander and you can be held liable.

---

So your idea is you can add the purported damages from the doxing to the purported libel of the gay prostitution?

Why not add in the damages form the guy that purportedly gave you a black eye?

---

Don't forget the guy who broke his arm in his fabricated backrooming hoax!

And kew, if people "just can't lie and make things up about people" I could sue YOU endlessly. But I don't need a greasy surfboard, an old car, or free memberships into NAMBLA.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I don't believe this is true. What is needed is to prove financial damage and I can do that from Mdawgs doxing. yes, I wouldn't be able to remain anonymous when filing a claim like this as I have tried and wanted to do on the forum. But most people would be willing to give up some anonymity for a piece of the middle-eastern oil money. :rolleyes:

Luckily for Mdawg, I am not most people. That is just not how I fly, so he doesn't have to worry about that. And me saying that probably wouldn't make me a very good poker player. Just being truthful. I am not going to sue. But some day, someone might. And I believe they would have a case if they can prove financial damages.

Have you not followed the Trump verdicts in this Caroll woman case? You just can't lie and make up things about people. It is called slander and you can be held liable.

---

So your idea is you can add the purported damages from the doxing to the purported libel of the gay prostitution?

Why not add in the damages form the guy that purportedly gave you a black eye?

---

Don't forget the guy who broke his arm in his fabricated backrooming hoax!

And kew, if people "just can't lie and make things up about people" I could sue YOU endlessly. But I don't need a greasy surfboard, an old car, or free memberships into NAMBLA.

---

I let the jackwad, fat Latino security guard that broke my arm off the hook. Mainly because I didn't see intent. He was doing what he was told. But intent or not, he did give me a bit of a shove, that resulted in a fracture in my arm. I could have gone after him. But he has no money and had lost what little income he had, when the casino threw him under the bus. That was good enough for me. I hope he learned something from it. Now had he been a Rockefeller, instead of a broke, whatever Latino name he had....maybe I would have reached a different decision. :D

The surfboard isn't mine. It hasn't been mine for a quarter century since I was teen. It is cracked and certainly not functional. I assume it has some sentimental value to my brother. But if you want it that bad Rob, I will talk to him. Perhaps you can put it in the storage area of your daughter's house, next to the computer you hit the million and a hlf jackpot on. It will fit in nicely there with the exercise equipment. :cool:

I thought kewl died.

How can you sue someone if you're dead?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ray Finkle

I thought kewl died.

How can you sue someone if you're dead?

---

You cannot, but your ESTATE can file suit.

Oh, you would be surprised what someone can sue for. :D Not you Mrv.....I am sure you know.

Case in point: I recently posted a couple of experiences on the topic of casino cheating, or not even that, just possible casino cheating. I named 2 different casinos. In neither case did I accuse anyone of cheating. I thought they might be, but later proved to myself that one wasn't. keep in mind, this wasn't in reference to any other incidents that I may have had with any casino. What I wrote about recently occurred years ago.

So this morning I received a quick call from my attorney, asking me not to mention any casino in anything. Or specifically one. :D He said he read what I wrote and it doesn't violate anything, but not to agitate them. So these crybabies, involved in the incident last year, saw me mention them in a completely different conversation which didn't violate anything, and went crying like a 5 year old. :D

And guess what, I am probably going to get another call after THIS post in which I mentioned no casinos by name. :cool:

Dan Druff should thank me:: This little bitty troll forum with about a dozen members trolling and hating, and because of me, who knows who is reading. In the last 24 hours at least 1 casino and one of the good guy attorneys. :D

Oh wow your attorney reads VCT.

*waves*

Hi KJ's attorney!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Oh wow your attorney reads VCT.

*waves*

Hi KJ's attorney!

---

And his mom. Maybe his mom is his attorney.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Oh wow your attorney reads VCT.

*waves*

Hi KJ's attorney!

---

I would say no, not on a regular basis. Only when he is directed to something like he was today.

And yes ball pincher, mom reads and my brother reads. I don't know how often for either but at least sometimes. My boyfriend does not read any more. He thinks it is stupid

You don’t have to read UNKewlJ’s posts to know that when the going gets tough and he feels cornered - some unknown anonymous party will have contacted him for no purpose other than his reporting to us some tidbit of something or other that came from the never to be named source, that his diseased mind thinks supports his fable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Oh wow your attorney reads VCT.

*waves*

Hi KJ's attorney!

---

I would say no, not on a regular basis. Only when he is directed to something like he was today.

And yes ball pincher, mom reads and my brother reads. I don't know how often for either but at least sometimes. My boyfriend does not read any more. He thinks it is stupid

---

So do you have to pay him each time he checks here or is it covered by his retainer?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Oh wow your attorney reads VCT.

*waves*

Hi KJ's attorney!

---

I would say no, not on a regular basis. Only when he is directed to something like he was today.

And yes ball pincher, mom reads and my brother reads. I don't know how often for either but at least sometimes. My boyfriend does not read any more. He thinks it is stupid

---

Do you assign them homework and quizzes based on their readings?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Oh wow your attorney reads VCT.

*waves*

Hi KJ's attorney!

---

I would say no, not on a regular basis. Only when he is directed to something like he was today.

And yes ball pincher, mom reads and my brother reads. I don't know how often for either but at least sometimes. My boyfriend does not read any more. He thinks it is stupid

---

So do you have to pay him each time he checks here or is it covered by his retainer?

---

There is no retainer. What do you think I am some casino that abuses people regularly? :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

So do you have to pay him each time he checks here or is it covered by his retainer?

---

Of course not, fake attorneys work for free for kewl of course!

I'm glad the attorney reads this forum: a Las Vegas attorney who specializes in suing casinos should read all LV themed gambling forums.

As for KJ's atty: I assume he was concerned that mentioning South Point might be seen as a violation of any existent NDA.

Close call?

I'm confused.
Is he dead or not?

.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

At this point anyone who thinks FraudJ represents anything truthfully or factually correct is a fool.....RIP

---

The End.

I'd say it's time for kew to fake his death again. This time due to humiliation.

The beat goes on. Kew only tells these tall tales to get attention and to feel as if he's important, due to him having a miserable & failed life--like so many in his pathetic generation have.

The only forum-verifiable aspect about him is there is virtually nothing believable in any of his stories. How many times has he been caught in multiple lies, only to prove in his rambling essays that he made the whole thing up? I do not believe I've ever come across a more stupid and worse story-planner anywhere, ever. It IS overall entertaining though--especially when he fabricates things about others out of frustration because he knows he just doesn't measure up. Which only goes to show how much he's always torturing himself.

So much FUN!