Let me craft Rob's response.
"I don't need to prove myself to you or anyone. Penis, queer, homo, nigger, penis."
Printable View
Let me craft Rob's response.
"I don't need to prove myself to you or anyone. Penis, queer, homo, nigger, penis."
I added to my previous post. I don't imagine anyone cares, but just in case.
I said it was highly likely Singer worked the double up bug. Prove my opinion wrong. You've had what, over two years to do it. And you still haven't proven a fucking thing. Whether Singer had a newell or not does not prove or disprove whether he worked the double up bug or not. And all YOUR nastiness won't change that fact. You stupid bitch. Repeat, whether Singer bought a newell or not does not prove or disprove he worked the double up bug. Damn, you are dense.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
LMAOQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
This is a prime example of why it is pointless to try and reason with a hobo. It's best to just crush them and let them go hide under the bridge next time they see you coming to cross.
I find it hilarious that redietz is talking about "lack of information" to a bunch of AP's who always provide a lack of information about themselves. LOL!Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by OzzyWhat a pathetic interview by Rusty, total disgrace. He should be ashamed of himself. Other then Rob looking 25 years older then his GOAT Alan interview, he was his usual comedic self. Alan absolutely decimates Rusty as an interviewer, no contest whatsoever !Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Shackleford did fine if this was an Entertainment Tonight interview, or Jimmy Fallon, and nobody's feelings were supposed to be hurt. On the other hand, since this was somebody claiming to have steamrollered casinos for a million and a half with the double up bug, there were a couple gaps. Like, "Where did you first play it?" comes to mind. That is an obvious starting point question, and there is no real reason for Rob to not answer that question if he's confessing to having used the bug.
If you'll notice, Rob's origin of the DU claim that Alan published on his site lacked any (and I mean ANY) specific details. It was noticeable by its lack of detail. Here's one of many good books that discusses the problem with lack of specificity, especially when information is "volunteered."
https://www.amazon.com/Practical-Int...9322259&sr=8-1
So, a few questions that Shackleford missed. Now bear in mind that someone conducting an interview that will potentially be seen by thousands of people should, in term of any journalism training, at least survey a couple of past interviews with the person for salient points, especially when there ARE ONLY A FEW PAST INTERVIEWS. If you don't do that as an interviewer, you're being lazy. No worse than Jimmy Fallon, but lazy nonetheless.
Here's a couple of obvious questions.
1) Where were the first couple of places you played the DU bug? What did it feel like? How much did you win? (These are really obvious starting points)
2) Was your claim of "machine telepathy" from the Alan interview just nonsense to cover your double up claim, or do you believe that? (The telepathy comment stands out so badly, it has to be addressed, especially by a math/science guy). That question easily leads to the next question.
3) Did you mislead Mendelson with those original interviews? If so, how can we verify that you're not misleading me and the audience in the current interview? What reasons to we have to believe you?
4) Where was the final place you played the DU bug? How much did you win? How did it feel to stop? Did you know that was your final time playing it as you played it?
And finally, the idea that Rob never told his family members, but then just magically made $1.6 million appear to buy a Newell -- well, that deserves some follow up questions or comments. Like, (5) "How did you explain the sudden million and a half available for luxury items to your family?" The problem with this follow-up (for Rob) is that he'd have to answer with something suggesting it wasn't surprising to his family. That likely means Rob would have to offer further details like these chunks of money appeared to his family before for other reasons. The problem with that answer is that you can then ask, "Like when?" and Rob would have to provide a detail of when and where a million showed up out of the blue previously.
Rob would have to report that he never told his family about the DU until the end. The question would then be why he didn't tell them. That makes it seem as if (A) Rob didn't trust his family to keep a lid on it or (B) Rob was concerned with legal ramifications. If he was concerned with legal ramifications, then you get into Rob having to be the only person with access to the safe. Otherwise the family is also on the hook legally. It's a real slippery slope, that money-in-the-safe bit.
And, finally, since Rob reported before his DU bug claim that the DU was illegal (on this very forum, I believe), Shackleford could have asked (6) why would you publicly state that you felt the DU was illegal when you were doing it? What sense does that make? Doesn't that undermine your whole story?
These are pretty straightforward and obvious questions most interviewers with a journalism background of any kind would have asked. I think most halfway interested people would have asked them. So it's striking that they didn't get asked.
Now, as far as mickey believing Rob did the DU bug, the easy way to clean that whole bit up would be for mickey to interview Rob on camera and ask the questions just listed above. Rob would have a non-adversarial interviewer, and I would pick up the tab for that interview, which would then be put on YouTube.
redietz premise that the family didn't know about the money is also faulty. I think Singer already told us that his wife thought he was a video poker god because of all the money rolling in. IIRC, they thought he was working his progression the whole time. Then he confessed to them that he made the money a different way after the statute of limitations ran out. I think he wrote that here.
Also, I can't remember where it's at but Singer progression strategy was published in full. It's around here somewhere but I can't remember where. And as for details on the double up he provided plenty of details. For starters, he knew the published sequence was wrong and even published the correct sequence. He had specific knowledge of which machines it worked on and the various denoms that could be found on those machines. I think he knew the exact years the machines had to be manufactured.
I've been in the same forums with Singer longer than anyone here. I think it goes back to about 2005 or 2006. I remembered that he announced his retirement from "professional video poker" in 2009 just after the two dumbos got busted working the DU. I think its more than coincidence. Singer's retirement in that time frame, along with the details he put up about the play, is what tilted me to thinking he probably did work it. Who would want to go back to the progression play after the easy money DU? And with someone getting busted for it, if it were me, I would want to bug out. I'm not 100% positive he worked it because I wasn't there. None of us know 100% if he worked it or not. But I think it likely that he did.
I voiced my opinion and thought that would be it. I never expected the vicious attacks by maxpen and KJ, both of whom I was pretty much allied with up until that time. Their continued attacks/brow beating hasn't worked for them and won't. I still hold the same opinion. It's a sad commentary that they chose to make an enemy out of me over an opinion that was no skin off of either of their backs.
PS: It's redietz idea for an "interrogation" of Singer so its probably best that he conducts it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI find it hilarious that redietz is talking about "lack of information" to a bunch of AP's who always provide a lack of information about themselves. LOL!Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
Shackleford did fine if this was an Entertainment Tonight interview, or Jimmy Fallon, and nobody's feelings were supposed to be hurt. On the other hand, since this was somebody claiming to have steamrollered casinos for a million and a half with the double up bug, there were a couple gaps. Like, "Where did you first play it?" comes to mind. That is an obvious starting point question, and there is no real reason for Rob to not answer that question if he's confessing to having used the bug.
If you'll notice, Rob's origin of the DU claim that Alan published on his site lacked any (and I mean ANY) specific details. It was noticeable by its lack of detail. Here's one of many good books that discusses the problem with lack of specificity, especially when information is "volunteered."
https://www.amazon.com/Practical-Int...9322259&sr=8-1
So, a few questions that Shackleford missed. Now bear in mind that someone conducting an interview that will potentially be seen by thousands of people should, in term of any journalism training, at least survey a couple of past interviews with the person for salient points, especially when there ARE ONLY A FEW PAST INTERVIEWS. If you don't do that as an interviewer, you're being lazy. No worse than Jimmy Fallon, but lazy nonetheless.
Here's a couple of obvious questions.
1) Where were the first couple of places you played the DU bug? What did it feel like? How much did you win? (These are really obvious starting points)
2) Was your claim of "machine telepathy" from the Alan interview just nonsense to cover your double up claim, or do you believe that? (The telepathy comment stands out so badly, it has to be addressed, especially by a math/science guy). That question easily leads to the next question.
3) Did you mislead Mendelson with those original interviews? If so, how can we verify that you're not misleading me and the audience in the current interview? What reasons to we have to believe you?
4) Where was the final place you played the DU bug? How much did you win? How did it feel to stop? Did you know that was your final time playing it as you played it?
And finally, the idea that Rob never told his family members, but then just magically made $1.6 million appear to buy a Newell -- well, that deserves some follow up questions or comments. Like, (5) "How did you explain the sudden million and a half available for luxury items to your family?" The problem with this follow-up (for Rob) is that he'd have to answer with something suggesting it wasn't surprising to his family. That likely means Rob would have to offer further details like these chunks of money appeared to his family before for other reasons. The problem with that answer is that you can then ask, "Like when?" and Rob would have to provide a detail of when and where a million showed up out of the blue previously.
Rob would have to report that he never told his family about the DU until the end. The question would then be why he didn't tell them. That makes it seem as if (A) Rob didn't trust his family to keep a lid on it or (B) Rob was concerned with legal ramifications. If he was concerned with legal ramifications, then you get into Rob having to be the only person with access to the safe. Otherwise the family is also on the hook legally. It's a real slippery slope, that money-in-the-safe bit.
And, finally, since Rob reported before his DU bug claim that the DU was illegal (on this very forum, I believe), Shackleford could have asked (6) why would you publicly state that you felt the DU was illegal when you were doing it? What sense does that make? Doesn't that undermine your whole story?
These are pretty straightforward and obvious questions most interviewers with a journalism background of any kind would have asked. I think most halfway interested people would have asked them. So it's striking that they didn't get asked.
Now, as far as mickey believing Rob did the DU bug, the easy way to clean that whole bit up would be for mickey to interview Rob on camera and ask the questions just listed above. Rob would have a non-adversarial interviewer, and I would pick up the tab for that interview, which would then be put on YouTube.
redietz premise that the family didn't know about the money is also faulty. I think Singer already told us that his wife thought he was a video poker god because of all the money rolling in. IIRC, they thought he was working his progression the whole time. Then he confessed to them that he made the money a different way after the statute of limitations ran out. I think he wrote that here.
Also, I can't remember where it's at but Singer progression strategy was published in full. It's around here somewhere but I can't remember where. And as for details on the double up he provided plenty of details. For starters, he knew the published sequence was wrong and even published the correct sequence. He had specific knowledge of which machines it worked on and the various denoms that could be found on those machines. I think he knew the exact years the machines had to be manufactured.
I've been in the same forums with Singer longer than anyone here. I think it goes back to about 2005 or 2006. I remembered that he announced his retirement from "professional video poker" in 2009 just after the two dumbos got busted working the DU. I think its more than coincidence. Singer's retirement in that time frame, along with the details he put up about the play, is what tilted me to thinking he probably did work it. Who would want to go back to the progression play after the easy money DU? And with someone getting busted for it, if it were me, I would want to bug out. I'm not 100% positive he worked it because I wasn't there. None of us know 100% if he worked it or not. But I think it likely that he did.
I voiced my opinion and thought that would be it. I never expected the vicious attacks by maxpen and KJ, both of whom I was pretty much allied with up until that time. Their continued attacks/brow beating hasn't worked for them and won't. I still hold the same opinion. It's a sad commentary that they chose to make an enemy out of me over an opinion that was no skin off of either of their backs.
PS: It's redietz idea for an "interrogation" of Singer so its probably best that he conducts it.
There are no details in the piece published on Mendelson's site and then pulled. That was written by Rob for the public as a formal piece, and nothing was offered. Why he would fail to provide any details for the widest audience, I cannot tell you.
As to the questions enumerated above, the questions I listed are all pathetically obvious. They are literally the first things that come to mind for anyone. Any journalism freshman would ask them. So I guess I'm wondering, mickey, why you haven't asked them.
I have. Over and over and OVER again. The latest last night.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I give you facts but you refuse to believe.
Facts are:
The guy claims to have won 2.8 million from double up bug and another 400k from a progression system and both he and his wife had well paying government jobs in aerospace industry and for the government for 30+ years.
And yet: He has no money. He owns no property. He has never owned any property. At age 72 he lives off his children and spends 6 months a year living in a small pull behind camper/trailer.
And while there is no record of any assets including real estate owned, there are evictions, bankruptcies and judgements against on his permanent record. I won't even consider the food stamp abuse since it has been removed.
The man is simply a degenerate gambler who lost whatever money he had and his retirement plan now consists of living off his kids. And like all degenerate gamblers he has stories to tell that don't match his financial reality.
I have led you right to the edge of the stream mickey. Nothing I can do if you refuse to take a drink of water and die of thirst.
As weird as you are, you are somewhat on the right track here. But that's only because you are coming up this stuff 100% after the fact.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by OzzyWhat a pathetic interview by Rusty, total disgrace. He should be ashamed of himself. Other then Rob looking 25 years older then his GOAT Alan interview, he was his usual comedic self. Alan absolutely decimates Rusty as an interviewer, no contest whatsoever !Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Shackleford did fine if this was an Entertainment Tonight interview, or Jimmy Fallon, and nobody's feelings were supposed to be hurt. On the other hand, since this was somebody claiming to have steamrollered casinos for a million and a half with the double up bug, there were a couple gaps. Like, "Where did you first play it?" comes to mind. That is an obvious starting point question, and there is no real reason for Rob to not answer that question if he's confessing to having used the bug.
If you'll notice, Rob's origin of the DU claim that Alan published on his site lacked any (and I mean ANY) specific details. It was noticeable by its lack of detail. Here's one of many good books that discusses the problem with lack of specificity, especially when information is "volunteered."
https://www.amazon.com/Practical-Int...9322259&sr=8-1
So, a few questions that Shackleford missed. Now bear in mind that someone conducting an interview that will potentially be seen by thousands of people should, in term of any journalism training, at least survey a couple of past interviews with the person for salient points, especially when there ARE ONLY A FEW PAST INTERVIEWS. If you don't do that as an interviewer, you're being lazy. No worse than Jimmy Fallon, but lazy nonetheless.
Here's a couple of obvious questions.
1) Where were the first couple of places you played the DU bug? What did it feel like? How much did you win? (These are really obvious starting points)
2) Was your claim of "machine telepathy" from the Alan interview just nonsense to cover your double up claim, or do you believe that? (The telepathy comment stands out so badly, it has to be addressed, especially by a math/science guy). That question easily leads to the next question.
3) Did you mislead Mendelson with those original interviews? If so, how can we verify that you're not misleading me and the audience in the current interview? What reasons to we have to believe you?
4) Where was the final place you played the DU bug? How much did you win? How did it feel to stop? Did you know that was your final time playing it as you played it?
And finally, the idea that Rob never told his family members, but then just magically made $1.6 million appear to buy a Newell -- well, that deserves some follow up questions or comments. Like, (5) "How did you explain the sudden million and a half available for luxury items to your family?" The problem with this follow-up (for Rob) is that he'd have to answer with something suggesting it wasn't surprising to his family. That likely means Rob would have to offer further details like these chunks of money appeared to his family before for other reasons. The problem with that answer is that you can then ask, "Like when?" and Rob would have to provide a detail of when and where a million showed up out of the blue previously.
Rob would have to report that he never told his family about the DU until the end. The question would then be why he didn't tell them. That makes it seem as if (A) Rob didn't trust his family to keep a lid on it or (B) Rob was concerned with legal ramifications. If he was concerned with legal ramifications, then you get into Rob having to be the only person with access to the safe. Otherwise the family is also on the hook legally. It's a real slippery slope, that money-in-the-safe bit.
And, finally, since Rob reported before his DU bug claim that the DU was illegal (on this very forum, I believe), Shackleford could have asked (6) why would you publicly state that you felt the DU was illegal when you were doing it? What sense does that make? Doesn't that undermine your whole story?
These are pretty straightforward and obvious questions most interviewers with a journalism background of any kind would have asked. I think most halfway interested people would have asked them. So it's striking that they didn't get asked.
Now, as far as mickey believing Rob did the DU bug, the easy way to clean that whole bit up would be for mickey to interview Rob on camera and ask the questions just listed above. Rob would have a non-adversarial interviewer, and I would pick up the tab for that interview, which would then be put on YouTube.
ANY questions would have been fine, because when you're talking about history and not making it up on the go, it's easy. I'll even answer your questions here.
1. Perhaps wizard didn't ask where the first place I discovered the bug because, unlike you, he read about that topic pre-interview on this forum. Yet, WTF does "where first?" matter anyway?
2. Again, how many times must I explain that the various odd allegations I made about the machines over the years were nothing more than attempts at "minds occupation" for my own reasons, while covering as many bases as I felt comfortable covering along the way. And NO ONE could understand this unless they possessed two things: had the classroom training I went through, and we're able to walk in my shoes 24/7 from 2004 to 2019.
3. This is a stupid question. People will believe what they want to believe, and when it comes to me on forums, by and large most want to believe what their hate leads them to believe, or how their jealousy over my extremely stable and successful personal life as well as my overall interjection of myself into the video poker/gambling world, guides them from there.
4. Once again, this has all been answered here prior to the interview. Obviously it was disappointing to have to stop. And even more obviously, how could I have POSSIBLY known my last time playing it was my last time playing it, when I played it!?
I didn't tell my family until I told you folks. I said that before. Not wanting to beleaguer the point, but I have extensive training in when, how, and why to keep my mouth shut, and if you tell anybody until you're safe doing so then you're too weak to even trust yourself. You people want to psycho_analyze this just as kew does with basically everything about me. Better if you treat yourselves to an intensive reading with comprehension program.
I said the DU play was illegal because of the way Kane and Nestor played it. Using a pre-existing winner that you didn't gamble to get is in my mind, illegal.
Finally, wizard wasn't interested in some sort of interrogation. If you can't figure out why he held the interview then you'll never understand any of this.
BumpQuote:
Originally Posted by Mission146And...here you are still talking about it. Point, game, set, match...winner---Rob Singer.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ"monument to delusional reasoning" is a fair term, Mickey.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Regardless of what you or I or anyone may have thought initially, when questioned by 2 different forum owners, Rob tied his playing the double up bug to this fictional, make-believe Newell, claiming that is what he did with the money. No one else did that to him, He did that on his own!
That left proving ownership of the Newell, which he pulled not 1, not 2, not 3, but 4 massive bullshit attempts to con everyone.
1.) the pictures inside a Newell on the dealership floor.
2.) pictures of a completely different Newell that he snuck up on at a campground.
3.) a bill of sale with no company letterhead or logo and all signatures in the same handwriting
and 4.) an ad selling this fantasy Newell with 2 pictures and the sale sight unseen to a make believe buyer from overseas within a few hours.
No one seriously thinks you believe these things. But if you do then yes, it is a monument to delusional reasoning....sadly, yours, old boy.
By the way red, if you or anyone else wants to "interrogate" me on the DU issue, there's no problem. I just won't answer the same stuff we've discussed and I've answered multiple times. But I'll be more than obliging to explain the most important part of all this: how the entire thing works in every scenario. And that's because there is no one who knows the guts of how to make this play better than me. Anywhere.
One last comment: read and re-read everything mickey's had to say about why he believes it's more likely than not that I put down this play. He doesn't use emotion; he's explained himself very well. And believe me, if he simply went on emotion then he'd be just as blind as the automatic critics. Also, if certain people REALLY didn't believe me and they are using whether or not we bought the RV as their barometer, then them backing out of the chance to see it as I was selling it--as they continuously vowed they would do--should tell you and everybody else what they really felt.
The obvious answer is I'm not a journalism student. So my question is why would you mistake me for a journalism student? But here's a clue. One thing you might not remember is I talked to Rob over the phone for probably an hour about the DUB. I don't recall the entire conversation but do recall parts of it. But, in short, I have more information on the details of the play than you guys do.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Question 1: For casinos, in the Shack interview, Rob mentioned Mara Lago where the play worked on all their game kings. And he mentioned the Mirage where it worked on only one machine.
Question 2)The "machine telepathy" question is irrelevant to Singer's progressive strategy and also to the DUB.
Question 3: Showing Mendelson his progressive strategy was not misleading Mendelson about the strategy itself. According to Singer, he put the progressive strategy on hold when he found the DUB. That doesn't mean he considered the strategy to really be a loser. I personally have always thought, and I've said it here more than once going back years ago, that Rob truly believes his progressive strategy works. So I don't get the Mendelson spiel that Rob defrauded him.
Question 4. I don't know the last casino Rob worked the DUB play but he did tell me the last casino he intended to play it, but went there and found out they wouldn't turn on the double up anymore. He also told me of the information he received from an employee there about why they wouldn't turn the double up on anymore. I'm not giving names because Rob hasn't made that public that I know of.
Unbelievable. How do you know someone you only know from this forum has no money, owns no property and has never owned property. You are just super frickin' loopy. You really need to lay off that LSD laced water you're drinking.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI have. Over and over and OVER again. The latest last night.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I give you facts but you refuse to believe.
Facts are:
The guy claims to have won 2.8 million from double up bug and another 400k from a progression system and both he and his wife had well paying government jobs in aerospace industry and for the government for 30+ years.
And yet: He has no money. He owns no property. He has never owned any property. At age 72 he lives off his children and spends 6 months a year living in a small pull behind camper/trailer.
And while there is no record of any assets including real estate owned, there are evictions, bankruptcies and judgements against on his permanent record. I won't even consider the food stamp abuse since it has been removed.
The man is simply a degenerate gambler who lost whatever money he had and his retirement plan now consists of living off his kids. And like all degenerate gamblers he has stories to tell that don't match his financial reality.
I have led you right to the edge of the stream mickey. Nothing I can do if you refuse to take a drink of water and die of thirst.
Why do you have to call names. Just proves you are nothing but another low life despite being a top AP.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I know him because I looked him up! In case you have forgotten it is 2021. This kind of info is available on anyone. Hell people found info on me in the last few weeks. Only difference was to their dismay it confirmed my claims where as everything available on Singer contradicts almost everything he claims.
It is what it is Mickey. It's 2021 and anyone making up the fantasy crap that a Singer or MDawg does will be found out and exposed.
Once again you are long on innuendo and....not just short on facts, you have no facts at all. Just false premises you conjure up to back up fantastical arguments. Give it a break.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWhy do you have to call names. Just proves you are nothing but another low life despite being a top AP.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I know him because I looked him up! In case you have forgotten it is 2021. This kind of info is available on anyone. Hell people found info on me in the last few weeks. Only difference was to their dismay it confirmed my claims where as everything available on Singer contradicts almost everything he claims.
It is what it is Mickey. It's 2021 and anyone making up the fantasy crap that a Singer or MDawg does will be found out and exposed.
I just have to add the obvious, once again. You know, everything I post about Rob is obvious.
One reason someone like Rob wants to deflect where he played something the first time, and the last time, is that any specifics could potentially be traced. They would be giveaways -- was he at that location at that time? Was the DU bug actually available at those locations at those times? Rob avoids all specifics. There's no reason to avoid them if the stories are true. Now if it's all fairy tales, then specifics have all kinds of problems attached to them.
But anyone with half a brain knows this stuff.
Nobody who actually read Rob's DU origin story on the Mendelson site, written by Rob, was going to walk away believing it.
True dummy. I've posted on this forum where I first discovered the bug. So instead of claiming "Deflection! Deflection!"---if this irrelevant info is so important to your weird purpose here, JUST LOOK IT UP.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Kew, you're well known for creating chaos, conflict and drama with your lies and crazy spins on forums. Everyone already knows why you ran for Brokeback Mountain instead of coming over here to see the Newell first hand. Now let's see you post a single piece of evidence that I've never owned property, that I currently don't own property, that our retirement account doesn't have 7-figures because we "are broke", that I've lost money because I'm a "degenerate gambler", we live "off of our children", and that we spend "6 months a year living in a small camper". Oh....and your previous claims of my "welfare fraud" and "food stamps fraud".
You're fabricating every one of these lies simply because I don't believe anything you say about you being a supposed "bj pro who wins every year", and my labeling you as a confused soft noodle with crossed wires upstairs who loves getting rammed up the ass and then licking the chocolate stick.
Wise up, idiots.
Look the food stamp thing has been removed. i acknowledge that. I don't know if that is due to you asking to have it removed or it just fell off after x amount of years (which I suspect is the case). Either way, that is off the table.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
The other info, I can't post and you know it. When someone looks up this kind of information, they agree with the site providing the information not to publicly disclose it. More importantly most forums, including this one has a policy against me posting that info. I can post what I found but not copies of info. And Dan Druff enforced that against me just recently with Mdawg.
So all I can really do is post a recap of what I found and sort of direct others to look for themselves. And that is what I did.
And others, whether based on my steering them in the right direction, or on their own have also looked and done their own investigating and found the same info. This stuff is basically public information Rob. I know because it was used against me in the last month. It is 2021 and that is the way things are. Information is available. So anyone like you or this Mdawg that makes claims that are way out there and complete nonsense will be exposed. That is just the way it is old fella.
Who are the others? When did any others disclose that they found the same info?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Look it up for yourself troll. I am not finding anything already posted for the likes of a troll like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyWho are the others? When did any others disclose that they found the same info?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
So you have nothing but excuses and nothing to back up your lies. Hmmm....isn't this the EXACT same thing your sorry ass is getting reemed for on that other forum right about now?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJLook the food stamp thing has been removed. i acknowledge that. I don't know if that is due to you asking to have it removed or it just fell off after x amount of years (which I suspect is the case). Either way, that is off the table.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
The other info, I can't post and you know it. When someone looks up this kind of information, they agree with the site providing the information not to publicly disclose it. More importantly most forums, including this one has a policy against me posting that info. I can post what I found but not copies of info. And Dan Druff enforced that against me just recently with Mdawg.
So all I can really do is post a recap of what I found and sort of direct others to look for themselves. And that is what I did.
And others, whether based on my steering them in the right direction, or on their own have also looked and done their own investigating and found the same info. This stuff is basically public information Rob. I know because it was used against me in the last month. It is 2021 and that is the way things are. Information is available. So anyone like you or this Mdawg that makes claims that are way out there and complete nonsense will be exposed. That is just the way it is old fella.
Who else but kew could get caught telling lies ON TWO DIFFERENT FORUMS ABOUT TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE AT THE SAME TIME!? And you compound those lies with more lies about yourself! Am I right in suggesting that only a homo with a set of crossed wires upstairs could accomplish such a remarkable feat?
If you're thinking about faking your own death again in order to escape your humiliation, I'd rather get a good 'ol belly-laugh if you actually ended up eating dirt this time around.
Please....Pretty Please??