n
https://youtu.be/kWRexgHOo08?si=DIG9rJlzKzngXFiA
Printable View
They start out talking about casino promotions. There's some kind of big play going on with a casino promotion in Colorado right now. I've been seeing some Twitter chatter about it.
https://youtu.be/VPikWZDhdMg?si=owQv1xGg2k0GFtDO
My Guess is Virgin Casino or Mohegan sun, whichever the sportsbook officially is, will be packed on Thursday/Friday with the no juice promotion. I will stop in just to see. And maybe make a few wagers if I can get lines at my books that might guarantee a win. Should be a couple of those opportunities. At the amounts I bet (hundreds, not thousands), getting one side at say +105, maybe +110 and the other at +100, would only amount to a few bucks EV. But like I always say, it all adds up. :D
Thanks for the no juice tip Mickey.
Or having the last big sucker of only a handful to believe in your slot wins die off suddenly. The guy who believed in 18 yo's in a row, but made a video of you instead. Ha.
OppsIdidItAgain OppsIdidItAgain is online now
Gold
OppsIdidItAgain's AvatarJoin Date
May 2023
Posts
142
Okay, one final follow-up post, as I did with MHF, the last time around, at the same number of posts. And with the last line of my post above, to ferret out that elusive numeral, 142.
---> Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves (video game).
https://anagram-solver.net/The%20guy....?partial=true
Now we have forty thieves plus one, their "leader", which makes 41 = (-1 + 42) ---> 142.
https://youtu.be/W0Xz7yQj1sE
OppsIdidItAgain OppsIdidItAgain is online now
Gold
OppsIdidItAgain's AvatarJoin Date
May 2023
Posts
143
Delete
Any Fezzik fans around? He does a VSIN show on Friday and it's on Youtube on Sat or Sun.
Put "vsin fezzik" in the Youtube search bar.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuhBa-ZCPec
I'm something of a Fezzik fan in that he accomplished things playing large-entry-fee contests that will probably never be matched. I also give caveats regarding Fezzik, however, because he did some things after partnering with people that were not cool at all. He tried to circumvent authority structures with people with whom you do not circumvent chain of command.
Anyway, he was a great contest player, but that does not always translate into week-to-week sports betting gambling. He did very poorly one season (we all have "those seasons," don't get me wrong), and his performance and conduct led him to publicly announce his self-retirement from large-scale wagering. He said he was restricting himself. You may be able to track down the actual column he claimed to be semi-retiring; it was in the LV Reviews-Journal/Sun, I think. About five years passed, and he was allowed to ease back into the public eye and start wagering significantly again.
March Madness has such a volatile structure year-to-year that I'm not sure any lessons in historicity have much value, but I am not a specialist. College basketball is the one sport that has been amenable to being solved by both savants and programmers and combinations of both, but tweaks in rules that seem less-than-huge can and will have large, sometimes unpredictable effects. The composition of the tournament committee can have similarly large, unpredictable effects (see UNC's inclusion this year as an example).
Historically, college basketball has been the most vulnerable sport in terms of players who wager actually making money.