So why were you not suspended for reporting rob singer’s inaccurate info?
Printable View
When I reported on Rob Singer it was clearly identified as being his strategy and Rob was 100% up front and honest that ALL of his special plays were at a DISADVANTAGE to conventional strategy. Think about that: he presented his strategy and honestly said what it's shortcomings are.
Kewlj you made an outrageous claim that losing $8800 contributed to your profits because it was part of your +EV play. I will never accept that losing $8800 of real money will be a positive development. Never.
As I said before, all you had to say was "I played anticipating a positive edge, but it didn't work out." No one would complain about that. But when you start twisting and turning and dancing claiming that losing $8800 contributes to some cockamamie +EV strategy rational minds are going to say WTF?
But, KJ does have an edge. You don’t. He has credibility—you sound like a fool.
KJ had a great quote...
I'm all ears jbjb. Please detail the winning strategies you employ. (LOL)
Hi Mickey,
At Seven Feathers here in SW Oregon they own the truck stop & gas station across the street from the casino. They allow players card holders to use comps for fuel. We alternate vehicles and my card or my wife’s for our weekly visit. We haven’t had to use actual cash or debit to pay for gas in quite some time. That’s our AP (not really) move. LOL.
P.S.
I regularly play 9/7 DB @ $1 but never did find the 10/7 DB that you mentioned you had heard about somewhere online.
I dont know why its important for people who AP to want to make people like AM believe that they have a viable way to make money. In fact the more people who think you dont exist..the better for you operating under the radar.
No one would ever expect you to provide tax returns, because it shouldnt be that important in a normal persons life to see such documents. No one would ever expect you to divulge your methods or secrets...as that would be professional and financial suicide.
So all we can ever have is 'i am an AP"......AND "no you are not"
this type of back and forth has been going on in message boards all over the place...and has never changed any ones mind.
"you dont exist but show me proof".......And "I have no proof that I want to show you" ....is all we see,
Any dope knows that card counting works for a select group,of people, as casinos banish people who they suspect are using it.
Anyone knows that there are people like Billy Walters that have made millions on sports.
we know there are people who make a living on poker. People who have done it for years before the "moneymaker effect"....like doyle brunson.
All the above are Aps to some extent.
so all that can be debated is if an individual is a successful AP. Not whether its possible to be APs.
There is enough evidence to show successful APs exist
I happen to believe an AP like KJ that seems to tell the good and bad of his life and just doesnt crow about his wins . He even posted a loss and got questioned as to why he allowed himself to lose. Pretty funny.
So if you dont believe him or anyone else who claims to be a SUCCESSFUL AP...thats great. Choose not to and find another thread that interests you...because if you stay and argue ...all you can do is request evidence....and no one owes you evidence...just as I dont owe anyone evidence that I was a registered pharmacist.
Basically, fuck you if you dont believe it.....and then we move on.
And that will probably never happen. Guys like Alan don't want to be bothered with all the scouting, thinking, networking, strategies, investigation, and tactics AP's employ. He wants to enter the most convenient casino and sit (or stand) his ass in one spot and start gambling until whenever he's satisfied or he runs out of session money(some of the same traits a compulsive gambler would have. I'm not saying HE IS a compulsive gambler). He may be savvy enough to seek out better than average paytables(Don't play 6/5 jacks vs 8/5 bonus) and collect perks. If by some chance there's something extra going on, he knows to add it in. But it obviously ends there.
I have a feeling the reason he got interested in Rob Singers VP system in the first place is the fact that it didn't seem to require much effort in finding a location to play.
I couldn't give a rats ass what you accept or don't accept. You are a loud mouth blow hard who doesn't know a damn thing about how to play with an advantage. For Christ's sakes you can't even "accept" that you didn't see lightning strike, the same person 18 times in a row. :rolleyes: You are so far detached from reality, who freaking cares what you 'accept' or don't. :cool:
There are other positive developments regarding losing $8800 that I haven't even touched on. Like the fact that 'booking a loss' is often very beneficial to card counters who play the same rotation of casinos. It can increase longevity by a great deal, allowing for many more profitable hours. Now that is not to say anyone 'tries' to lose, but when you find yourself in a hole, it can be very beneficial to go ahead and quit and 'book that loss', have that loss recorded on your record.
I have 'triggers' for ending my session, which for the most part has to do with exiting after showing my spread, or if the count turns negative. There is also a time trigger. But sometimes if none of these triggers are met, and I find myself down, I will go ahead and exit, even though an 'exit trigger' has not been met, just to book that loss. Like I said, very beneficial to longevity. :cool:
I did not claim the entire loss for that day was at one casino. that need not be the case for it to be beneficial. Any "booked' loss is beneficial.
You do not need to present a players card to be known and/or have your play tracked. Casinos will actually assign an nickname to a regular player. Sometimes rather unflattering things of a descriptive nature. One of my entries in one of the databases is a description. (not all that accurate IMO)
Of course, what do I know.....I am a known liar.