Parlays lose again and Parlay Boy loses $13, not $1300.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LW6RWS...Bzb3V0aCBwYXJr
Printable View
Parlays lose again and Parlay Boy loses $13, not $1300.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LW6RWS...Bzb3V0aCBwYXJr
Can't win 'em all.
We ain't broke yet.
YET.
Tampa Puck Line
New Jersey Puck Line
Oilers Puck Line
Red Sox Run Line
Padres Run Line
11 days of losing.
I did recover about 6k last night.
I need more.
See Smart Money Thread for today's losing picks.
6 Teamer in the NHL will pay about 125 to 1 or so.
Why not us?
I will tell you why not. And this corresponds directing with your 11 days of losing. Come about April 1, a little earlier for some teams, the NBA and NHL become a nightmare. Final two weeks of the season. (NBA ends tomorrow, NHL on Thursday). You have teams that are locked into their playoff spot, can't go up or down in seeding that start resting players. You have teams that are out of the playoffs that aren't even trying. Swedes just wanting to get back to Sweden to feed the sheep or whatever they do. And the worst of it, you have some teams, especially in the NBA actually trying to lose, to get more balls in the lottery system. So you aren't just trying to figure out who is going to win, but who even is trying or worse case who might be trying to lose.
You gotta stop betting NBA/NHL come April 1, if not before at least until the playoffs.
And this "tanking of games" that is done in the NBA....hell the 76ers did it for a whole season 7-8 years ago in something dubbed "the process" is very, very close to throwing or "fixing"" games in my opinion.
Oh and if you want to talk about losing. My biggest bet of the day yesterday was SF Giants team total over 3.5 runs. I watched with delight as they scored 5 runs in 1st inning. Problem was the game was called after 5 innings leading 9-1, making my bet a no action.
yes, I know the rules, but still seems like something not right about that. :mad:
How is this a loss? If the game was called after 5 innings then it's in the books as finished/official (unless it ended in a tie). Whether it went 5 or 9 full innings, the Giants covered the over in a legal game. I get that bets may have been made on an over/under on their opponent, and that result ended as an incomplete. But how can a known win be against the rules?
It wasn't a loss. It was a no action.
Bets involving totals (both teams totals) or team totals (one teams total), must play usually 8 innings or more, varying slightly by sportsbook or it is a no action (push).
Read the rules on any sportsbook and you will see this. Does seem a little unfair in this particular situation though. :mad:
As this occurred, I KNEW it would be declared a no action. But I checked shortly afterwards and was pleasantly surprised to see it graded as a win. 20 minutes later I received an email telling me the game had been re-graded as a push. And when I checked the account, sure enough it has been changed.
I placed a dollar bet on an EXTREME LONGSHOT for a Championship. He had like 1 in a thousand odds and was in fact the last name for choices. He lost, but had he WON, I would have won $1,000, a VERY good return on just a dollar. :)
Setting niggers back decades daily with her stupidity!
MLK would have been embarrassed by this nog and realized some boons are just too stupid to be helped.
Her dad would have resisted his instinct to “Muh Dik” if he realized this tard would be the result.
The NAACP refuses to admit a swoogie can be this dumb.
Hell I feel dumber just reading what this floor shitting ape wrote above.
Hey Boz. There’s an episode of the Boondocks with MLK Jr. you might like, YouTube is your friend.
Anyways, seems like that Cheeto stained sweatpants motherfucker is losing lots of parlay’s lately.
This? Fucking hilarious and accurate!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QHCSL-...GHKiGM7w%3D%3D
Yes, I meant no-action.
But I'm not getting this 8 inning thing. Maybe for teams' totals & game overs/unders. But once a game is in the books, regardless of how many innings were played and there's an over bet that "wins", common sense says it should be paid. More innings played wouldn't change that.
V posted this in the Whatever thread but it deserves a bigger audience. And since most of what Monet posts is pure shit, this masterpiece helps the thread.
Originally Posted by Tasha View Post
I placed a dollar bet on an EXTREME LONGSHOT for a Championship. He had like 1 in a thousand odds and was in fact the last name for choices. He lost, but had he WON, I would have won $1,000, a VERY good return on just a dollar.
__________________________________________________ __________________________________
"Mammie, come looks at what I and I jus' wrote, it be so smart."
Mammie quit clipping her toe nails in the kitchen sink, looked over at her step-daughter and sighed.
"Chile, you knows I don't gives a shit what you writes, why 'den does you asks me to read it?"
These words stung.
"I and I asks you so's I and I gets some o' 'dat feedsback: I and I needs feedsback if'n I and I is gonna be de' new Shake-a-spear."
Mammie laughed so hard she accidently clipped off the end of her little toe; she kept guffawing as her blood ran.
"Girl, you ain't no Shake-a-speare, you be dumb as a box o' rocks."
This infuriated the wannabe black bard; in response she dropped trou and splatted a stinky gooey "treat" for Mammie, then said "Gets to work."
Mammie snapped; no longer would she take instruction from an autistic asexual moron who lacked all necessary life skills; she walked over, grabbed Karen by the hair then threw her to the linoleum kitchen floor, tightly gripping her nappy 'do while merrily wiping her smiling face through her own shit.
"MMM...tastes like chicken" thought Karen before she passed out from her shit-suffocation.
Her step-daughter finally silenced, Mammie turned on BET, lit up a fat blunt and munched a box of Cheez Its.
Hey Boz...here's some more Uncle Ruckus.
Pithy, poignant and pitiful.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_M7u_kW7Zk
I lost only ONE dollar on a longshot, not REALLY stupidity. And even you acknowledged that I'm smarter than I come across when I refused to fall for your set up lure where you claimed you could help me but were actually planning to make me look WORSE, not help me look BETTER.
I saw right through your set up lure and didn't fall for it and you said something like,"Tasha knew I was trying to do a lure setup and didn't fall for it. I was planning to make her look WORSE, not look BETTER, I wanted her to look like an immature tattletale who couldn't fight her own battles, not help her out and she realized that right off the bat and didn't fall for my lure setup. She's not as dumb as I thought."
Good for you for not falling for his lure bait setup trap ruse, Tasha. These kinds of lure bait setup trap ruses promise to help Posters look better but actually trick them into making themselves look worse. If you happen to fall for a lure bait setup trap ruse, other Posters will say something like, "Wow, you are an even worse Poster than I thought at first, I'm surprised you haven't been banned yet." I'm sure you do NOT want other Posters saying stuff like that about you. On the flip side, if you realize a Poster is trying to trick you these lure bait setup trap ruses and say something like "Hey, you are just trying to trick me with your lure bait setup trap ruse!" then other Posters will think you are not dumb and say something like, "Wow, you are not as dumb as I thought you were since you did not fall for that other Poster's lure bait setup trap ruse."
Oh my gosh tosha, people like you are why Randy Marsh got the puzzle about naggers wrong. You’re so annoying!
Personally my last straw with you was when I heard about the internet private message begging stuff, that was low. I stuck up for you sometimes before that.