Trump the multi-billionaire who tries his absolute hardest to avoid disclosing his wealth (tax-forms) while also bragging about how wealthy he is. Lol.
wise up.
Printable View
I doubt that Trump lives with even his wife and kid.
Quote:
First lady Melania Trump's living situation has been a point of curiosity since she made the unheard-of decision to not move into the White House immediately after President Donald Trump's inauguration.
Quote:
A new book by CNN correspondent Kate Bennett confirms long-standing rumors that the first lady doesn't only have her own room, but occupies an entirely separate floor of the White House from her husband.
Quote:
Though the White House has pushed back on previous reports that the first couple don't share a bedroom, some accounts of Melania's preference to maintain her own space go back as far as 2006, when a former Playboy model who says she had an affair with Donald said he took her to Trump Tower and showed her his wife Melania's separate bedroom.
lols.
Keystone is a genius like a typical Trumptard.
Mom's meatloaf was good stuff tonight. We watched some Wheel of Fortune. Mom won 2/3. I won 1. I asked mom to give me $7 to buy a bottle of wine down at the corner-store. Tonight is looking up.
Mickey don't be jelly !
Do you remember this kid, Nicholas Sandman? The main stream media branded him a racist. Why? He was caught wearing a MAGA hat. They viciously attacked and ruined the kid. But the kid fought back.
He layed lawsuits into several media outlets. CNN has settled but they won't report it. It took Fox News to report that they settled with the kid. CNN doesn't want anything to do with the Covington Kid anymore.
Washington post has now settled. The kid is now a multi-millionaire and still has lawsuits working against, ABC, CBS, NBC, The Guardian, New York Times, NPR, Gannet Newpapers, Huffington Post, among others.
If you want to follow this story you pretty much have to go with Fox News as the other outlets refuse to report it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrQBqBY7fm4
The reason is not the narrative you are given, Mickey. The reason this all went on the news was not because of his hat (which no doubt didn't help him) - it was because the story had already been all over twitter and social media. These outlets tried to catch up and went off this clip and the existing manufactured story behind it. Bad decision.
It would be interesting for CNN and such to report on these things, but this really isn't news that impacts me. Everyone who remembers this kid remembers there was some third party of black nationalists that caused all the ruckus, then old Indian got in this kids face and he just smiled and didn't back down. I'm pretty sure there were some retractments at the time when it became more clear what happened but yes CNN and whomever deserts a lot of shit for that. I don't know if it is necessarily news-worthy to hear the kid won a lawsuit.
Look up the word "prioritizing", Mickey.
It wouldn't surprise me if these thing are completely staged in order to scam companies out of money.
Wall Street Journal tells its Gen Z "woke" reporters to STFU:
https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrU...w._u4MTUTVjZc-
All lives matter. Most black lives don't matter. Just ask ANY of the Democrat Mayors in their big cities.
Italian lives matter. I tire of being name-associated with members of the mafia and cosa nostra. I'm OFFENDED!....and I demand REPARATIONS!!!!
A funny thing happened on Fox News and social media yesterday. Fox News anchor Harris Faulkner was on but was cutaway as they went to the press conference by Kayleigh McEnany. A couple of minutes into her briefing she showed a video of the Portland Riots. Shortly after the video was started Fox News cut away from the Press Conference. Harris Faulkner stated they didn't know video would be shown.
Conservatives on social media started bashing Fox News for cutting away from the press conference, and the video, showing the Portland Riot. They thought FNC was covering up the violence. The real reason Fox News cut away from the video was because it showed "FUCK COPS" on one of the monuments and it came over Fox News. LOL!
What you see in the video is what CNN and MSNBC continue to call "protestors." They are not protesters. They are out and out thugs/criminals.
Small businesses are closing down and leaving the big cities. You may not know it but in Montana and similar states, even though we are in a big recession, real estate prices are skyrocketing because of people fleeing the big cities.
For decades after the rioters are gone the downtown areas of these cities are going to be crime ridden wastelands.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCQVZaQOdAg
Peaceful protests....
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimam.../#239341d755f9
Quote:
In the United States, lasers are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. Lasers typically have a warning label alerting the consumer to the danger. Most lasers used in toys and games are labeled type I. Type I lasers have a power output of under .4 milliwatts and are incapable of damaging the retina. Most laser pointers are classified as type II or IIIA and have a power output of between 1 to 5 milliwatts. Theoretically, that is enough power to damage the retina. A paper published in the journal Ophthalmology in 1997 demonstrated retinal damage with continuous exposure to light from a laser pointer in as little as 10 seconds. In practice it would be difficult to damage the eye because the eye makes lots of tiny eye movements causing it to be almost impossible to achieve 10 seconds of continuous exposure. No cases of permanent damage from laser pointers labeled type II or IIIA have been reported in the literature.
http://www.pattyvisioncenters.com/20...urt-your-eyes/
Outside of pointy lasers and government employees trying to get a payout there is mention of "planted nails". This sounds like shit kids would do. "planted nailed". I guess maybe someone put out tacks while troops advanced?
When you send out federal troops snatching up people in unmarked van without any sort of articulable suspicion pf crime you should LOL with that list of injuries.
I'd be far more upset about the vet that had his hand broken when walking up to the troops. That is probably larger injury itself than any listed above.
lol @ conservatives who are pro-government goons that ignore the Constitution.
Yes, JP, there are more-powerful lasers that can, almost instantaneously, permanently damage the eye's retina. I imagine that then the damage wouldn't be called, in the article, if I recall, "likely" damage, with the hope of recovery. There would be other damage as well, maybe even collateral protester damage. I mean, watch the video of, apparently, a 40 W laser, which is 100-fold the 400 mW one. (Incidentally, words like likely/unlikely, in a non-probability context, tend to take on a more definite or certain form. So, eg, something that's unlikely isn't really expected to happen.) As well, note that lasers are nothing like the ones in the movies, not nearly so powerful. After all, energy has a mass equivalent.
In this regard, from one of the articles, "The good part is that the pupil is not very big and we can usually avoid it, but it doesn’t mean that it’s still safe." I guess that for three officers to be permanently blinded, this has to mean in six eyes. Again, for there to be much chance of this, the laser aperture would, I think, have to be of a more powerful laser.Quote:
Class IIIb
Lasers in this class may cause damage if the beam enters the eye directly. This generally applies to lasers powered from 5–500 mW. Lasers in this category can cause permanent eye damage with exposures of 1/100th of a second or more depending on the strength of the laser. A diffuse reflection is generally not hazardous but specular reflections can be just as dangerous as direct exposures. Protective eyewear is recommended when direct beam viewing of Class IIIb lasers may occur. Lasers at the high power end of this class may also present a fire hazard and can lightly burn skin.
Class IV
Lasers in this class have output powers of more than 500 mW in the beam and may cause severe, permanent damage to eye or skin without being focussed by optics of eye or instrumentation. Diffuse reflections of the laser beam can be hazardous to skin or eye within the nominal hazard zone. (The nominal hazard zone is the area around a laser in which the applicable MPE is exceeded.) Many industrial, scientific, military and medical lasers are in this category. Many handheld lasers ("laser pointers") at this output level are also now available in this category.
Quote:
Fortunately, it is unlikely that exposure to the light alone could cause an accident. In almost 75,000 reported laser illuminations worldwide from 2004 through 2018 there have not been any accidents. However, experts are concerned that bright light occurring at the wrong time — such as during an emergency, or when there is another problem for pilots to deal with — could be the “straw that breaks the camel’s back.”
However, pilot exposure in flight to laser light is highly unlikely to result in significant or permanent eye injury. In fact, as of February 2019, there have been no documented or proven cases of permanent eye injury to pilots, according to aviation agencies such as the U.S. FAA, U.K. CAA, and Transport Canada.
https://www.laserpointersafety.com/a...rds/index.html
Quote:
In order to blast a hole in something, you have to deposit more energy in a short amount of time faster than the energy can be dissipated away,” Kakalios explains. “If you can do this, then you can overwhelm the bonds holding the material together, and the atoms will fly away. But if the excess energy from the lasers can be carried away as heat, then all you’ll have done is warm up the material.”
For a laser to kill someone it essentially needs to be hot enough to boil or burn the tissue. It would take about a 1kW laser to boil through someone’s eye to their brain in a reasonable amount of time, meaning they probably couldn’t get away. Each cat toy level laser pointer is roughly 5mW. It would take 200,000 laser pointers all focusing through a lens to an exact point to create a laser powerful enough to kill. Each laser pointer (assuming the ones from laser pens since the pen tip is smaller than the cat toy laser) is 5mm across. So if you had 200,000 of them they would be in a grid about 7’ x7’. To get them to focus on a single spot, though, they would need to be in a semicircle with a radius of about 5.5’. So if you wanted to create a death ray with laser pointers, you could buy 200,000 laser pointers, mount them on a piece of a sphere with radius 5.5’, aim them all through a lens and ask your victim to sit very, very still.
Focusing through the eye and to the brain would be the easiest for sure but it would take a pretty exact hit to make sure the person died. The brain stem is right there but it would have to burn through exactly.
https://gizmodo.com/how-many-laser-p...man-1728253506
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVrJUbeuG44