Quote:
Originally Posted by rob.singer
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob.singer
Mdawg if you story and claims had ANY elements of truth to it, when the many people began challenging it, you would have been able to comely explain to people what they were missing and wouldn't have the need to immediately go to attacks and name calling and you wouldn't have done that NDA with Wizard, afraid that he would undermined you as he has still managed to do several times. You have absolutely 'played Wizard' with this fiasco. Allow the man that is providing the platform for this crap to just say what he thinks. He is a respected gambling math expert.
And if you were doing something no one else knew about (the holy grail) you wouldn't be posting about it on internet forums.
And if you were truly as worried about "protecting yourself" as you claim,Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
There's no way in hell you'd tell the world that you were back roomed and had your arm broken.
You'd be scared shitless someone would put two and two together.
Never happened....
I don't like you because of the lies that you've written about others.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Everybody is doing what they want to do on the forums.
You are doing what you want to do, and what you write makes you unlikeable.
Is that your idea of fun?
I don't know what you expect the Wizard to reveal if released from the NDA, but I suspect that you'll be even more disappointed than you are now.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
MDawg is not required to explain anything more than he chooses to explain.
That goes for him and everyone else.
His attacks on others were reciprocation for the insults directed at him for sharing his casino experiences.
These are the same kind of insults that have been endured by other members...Singer, Crimm, Alan, Spike, and now even Bob Dietz, to name a few...just for generously sharing their gambling and life adventures, with strangers who chose to read them.
They didn't deserve the nasty treatment they received, but those who insulted them absolutely deserve it in return.
What goes around, comes around, and I'm having fun making sure that it does.
Ahhh finally we see what motivates Coach Belly. lol. loser.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
Yeah, you're "The Equalizer" and "The Punisher" combined.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
Lions and tigers and bears, oh my!
Thank you, I have fun helping others out.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
I hope the folks I support appreciate it.
Well then lets find out? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
Look, people here have some questions about me. I have recently offered as part of a deal to release Wizard from the DNA that I would prove 2 of the things to Dan Druff. Now suppose I did that, BUT had Dan Druff sign an agreement not to say what he saw. Would that make any sense at all? Wouldn't everyone scream that I was hiding something? Well then.... :rolleyes:
Look Michael Shackleford is a gambling math expert. He has witnessed at least once Mdawg play. So lets just hear what he has to say about it, since these claims are being made on the platform that he controls. If Mdawg was legit, he would want Wizard to say so, no?
Now while I don't know exactly what Wizard would say, I have communicated back and forth with him 45 messages in the last year, mostly on this topic. So I think I have at least and idea what he would say. :rolleyes:
But maybe Mike would say that yes Mdawg has discovered the holy grail of gambling. Something no other player/AP has discovered and is in fact playing with an advantage. So again...lets find out. You on board Belly?
If you present written agreements from Shack & Druff that they will participate, and their conditions, then sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Since you've already had volumes of correspondence with Shack on the subject, and have developed an idea what he'll say, then post what you think he'll say, so we can compare it to what he's already written for any conflicts.
Great idea...Yes it would make sense!Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Here's the thing...MDawg has already met with Shack, and Shack witnessed him play...you haven't met with Druff.
So go ahead and even the playing field proactively. Meet with Druff first, and have him sign an NDA.
This way you can't renege, but none of your info is at risk.
What? why do you want to make it harder than need be? Lets just hear what the expert that has seen Mdawg play has to say.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyIf you present written agreements from Shack & Druff that they will participate, and their conditions, then sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Since you've already had volumes of correspondence with Shack on the subject, and have developed an idea what he'll say, then post what you think he'll say, so we can compare it to what he's already written for any conflicts.
And while I don't know exactly what he would say, I can guarantee it isn't what Mdawg was writing over at GF, when for a while he was saying his claims were "Wizard verified". :cool:
If his own family disowned him for being an intolerable irritant, it's no wonder that forums galore also send him on his way. Why should we put up with him when those who knew him best decided that he was garbage to be tossed.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
He's already said plenty.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
You made this challenge, Shack already has MD's info, Druff has nothing from you, so you're playing catch-up.
If this meeting were to happen I suggest Dan wear a cup to protect his junk from kews fairy touch.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyGreat idea...Yes it would make sense!Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Here's the thing...MDawg has already met with Shack, and Shack witnessed him play...you haven't met with Druff.
So go ahead and even the playing field proactively. Meet with Druff first, and have him sign an NDA.
This way you can't renege, but none of your info is at risk.
Hardly. Ha.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVYeah, you're "The Equalizer" and ...Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
Were Coach truly evening things out, then neither sorrow, nor joy, but, dispassion, would be his reward.
https://youtu.be/Ap7VLLRKceI
Nice chip there, boyo.
A question: are they embedded with a RFID or similar type chip so that they can be identified by the casino?
For example, if a ho steals your Rolex AND the chip, and you report it ASAP, will someone still be able to negotiate it?
If you lose it, will they "cancel" it and give you a replacement?
If not ... well, it seems pretty reckless to keep it on hand like you seem to: just sayin;.
The 100K chip - if lost or stolen can or will the casino do something about it? In theory - yes. In reality - maybe.
I tend to think “maybe at best” based on the Bellagio motorcycle robber who stole (among other chips) scores of 5000 and 25000 chips. In a rather fascinating account I read at Rolling Stone (the robber ended up being the son of a Vegas judge) apparently converting all but the 25000 “cranberries” was doable. The robber was never able to cash any of those and got caught when he tried to unload the cranberries to a Bellagio poker player who was aware of the robbery and acted as an informant for the police.
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture...ay-105349/amp/
So I think at the end of the day while no one would be able to cash a 100000 chip without proving ownership, that doesn’t mean that the chip would automatically be replaced for me by the casino.
As far as RFID Venetian uses those only to verify chip authenticity not to track.
MDAWG, if I was an Ass, I would have left this up. We all make mistakes.