Quote:
Originally Posted by
accountinquestion
Quote:
Originally Posted by
redietz
Actually, this was my error. I did the follow-up. It turns out that the original research was done at Stanford, but Stanford felt it was not conclusive and wanted no part in promoting Ivermectin, for obvious funding reasons. So two of the doctors who did the research resigned and spun it off into their own private company. I should have said, the PREVIOUS lead virologist at Stanford.
My error.
Name of these 2 doctors? Or at least the name of the company?
<crickets>
I'm sure.
Look it up, account. I tracked it down in about half an hour. Not my job to do your work for you.
You got everything dead wrong in your summary of my wagering and so on listed above. You don't look anything up. You aren't even close to correct about anything. It's bizarre. So I'm in the Wise Guys for 30 years, picking two ATS games every week for every football season for 30 years, and I don't handicap ATS? And did you bother to look up the McCusker Report pages printed on this site under Retro Road Trip? All of that is obviously ATS. Almost anything I do is ATS.
I have never encountered such a lazy liar.
The reason, as Boz noted, that I handle all of this ridiculous and incorrect posting is that I am always critically evaluating myself. To an extreme. So I feel it part of the process to respond even when what's being said is semi-ridiculous. Like you stating that I don't handicap ATS. That's about the dumbest thing anyone has ever said about me.
If you want to bet on the Stanford virologist, email me.