Volunteering for MDawg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

There is no one that though it impossible that Mdawg register a small winning session.

---

dork schnoz bet $2500 that he could not.

Some know-it-alls insisted that MDawg was not even a real person.

But he won on demand, when all the eyes were upon him...nobody else has done that.

If he did it once, then even you admit that he can obviously do it again.

Put your money where your mouth is and take the MDawg challenge.

Do it everyday for a month, until the somebody can't settle up.

The math says you will eventually win the challenge...right?

You can't win on demand like MDawg did even once. I'll bet you that you can't.

You want to make up rules for a challenge? Then make rules for your own challenge.

But proving yourself doesn't interest you, you're more interested in tearing somebody else down.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

There is no one that though it impossible that Mdawg register a small winning session.

---

dork schnoz bet $2500 that he could not.

Some know-it-alls insisted that MDawg was not even a real person.

But he won on demand, when all the eyes were upon him...nobody else has done that.

If he did it once, then even you admit that he can obviously do it again.

Put your money where your mouth is and take the MDawg challenge.

Do it everyday for a month, until the somebody can't settle up.

The math says you will eventually win the challenge...right?

You can't win on demand like MDawg did even once. I'll bet you that you can't.

Y

---

I am not interested in trying to win any specific session for show...for proof of something that it really isn't proof of. I am an advantage player. I win long-term. With all the real things that long-term advantage play involves, like plenty of losing sessions/days along the way and casino heat. I share these things and how I deal with them (or used to share). Where are these elements in Mdawgs fairytale? That is how you know it is bullshit.

Now if I or anyone wanted to show a winning session on demand (which again proves nothing), they could give themselves the best opportunity to do so playing some martingale type progression system. And THAT is almost assuredly what Mdawg did. But Wizard isn't allowed to say so publicly.

But regardless, that small winning session proves nothing about any longterm wins that Mdawg claims.

It would be like looking at election results from dixie notch NH at 12:10 am election night and thinking that proves who will win. Small sample size means NOTHING.

Of course if you are just playing games as you are, I guess it doesn't matter. You play your games.

Gotta say, I have never encountered a cat with the photographic memories, before, so hope that the r-e-dietz can eye-ball the m-dawg's prowess and report back to us with the appraisal, hey hey

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soxfan

Gotta say, I have never encountered a cat with the photographic memories, before, so hope that the r-e-dietz can eye-ball the m-dawg's prowess and report back to us with the appraisal, hey hey

---

I doubt you will answer without your trolling and craziness, but let me ask anyway: If someone, Mdawg or anyone else has such a memory that would allow them an advantage and to win, without the casino being able to figure out what they were doing, do you think the casino would do nothing? Just allow them to win day after day?

I am not going to wait for your answer. The answer is no. they would still employ countermeasures including backoffs and barings, just the same as if they knew what the player was doing.

And by the way, the memory nonsense is about the 5rth explanation Mdawg has come up with as to how he has won over the years. Some of the others were things like "betting into hot streak", Loss rebates, which of course he claims he never loses, and a few other voodoo type things.

Mdawgs story and claims....just isn't real. Absolutely NO aspect is the way things work in the real world or the way the math works. It is a guy writing a story. Always has been.

And you know who was one of the first people to recognize this wasn't real? The late Rob Singer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Hand on his hip, shrill whiny voice,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Not on my watch, Mister.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

some martingale type progression system. And THAT is almost assuredly what Mdawg did. But Wizard isn't allowed to say so publicly.

---

The Wizard specifically wrote that there was no martingale type progression. Check the record. Your assertion that Wizard saw that and cannot say so is complete, unsubstantiated, fabricated bullshit.

It's understood that you cannot, will not, and don't want to prove that you can win on demand. But MDawg did that, and of course can do it again. You have a problem with that, so you try to tear him down like it doesn't mean anything.

But you haven't shown anything with any meaning, and he has. Your story is just a story. His story comes with receipts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jdog

since kewl has never (and never will) provided proof of anything, MDawg has to be considered the more credible between the two.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

But you haven't shown anything with any meaning, and he has. Your story is just a story. His story comes with receipts.

---

You are big on receipts are you? By that token Singer showed a receipt or bill of sale for a 1.6 million dollar RV. Remember? generically printed from the internet with 3 different signatures in the same handwriting. That no more proved Singer bought and owned an Rv than what Mdawg shows.

Now again, I have not asked for any proof from Mdawg. Or anyone else. Just have you damn story not be something from some alternative reality like I win every day and the casinos love me for it. Is that really too much to ask?

This claim of all the winning, no countermeasures, and all the comps on top, to me and anyone that really plays is about as real as someone claiming they flap their arms and fly.

This Mdawg and Singer type shit is why we don't have more real players, share more of what they do, that might actually benefit some others players. Instead we get the twilight zone shit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mission146

In fairness to MDawg, he has definitely proven more about himself than I understand you to have done.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

This claim of all the winning, no countermeasures, and all the comps on top, to me and anyone that really plays is about as real as someone claiming they flap their arms and fly.

---

Then stand in front of him and call him on the carpet. Man up or shut up. If he were to claim he could fly then you would have no problem taking him up on a challenge that he can flap his arms and fly.

But for this gaming, you lack the strength of your conviction...he doesn't. You are unsure that you would prevail in a challenge...he wasn't.

You're a coward, a keyboard cowboy, same as you were with me, same as it ever was.

You have no business or standing to call anybody a liar on these forums, when you are an admitted and proven liar.

Anyway, enough of this nonsense. Red, if you do something where you witness and document, preferably by video, a larger number of Mdawg sessionsI look forward to results. But I suspect it will never happen.

[QUOTE=coach belly;185791]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Then stand in front of him and call him on the carpet.

---

WTF coach, do you live in a cave?

Calling him on the carpet is exactly what KJ has done for years.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Calling him on the carpet is exactly what KJ has done for years.

---

I wrote "stand in front of him".

Do you understand what that means?

Let the r-e-dietz put on his lucky fedora and get to the bottom of thing, hey hey.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soxfan

Let the r-e-dietz put on his lucky fedora and get to the bottom of thing, hey hey.

---

The ditz always comes up with some nonsense reasons to squash the meeting.

He demanded a notarized affidavit from Singer's wife, or some such bullshit, before he would meet with Rob.

Being a member of the SSDPE is the only thing that caught my attention.
I thought that mentalist Banachek and Michael Edwards fooled the shit out of James Randi's Project Alpha?
Didn't they hold a press conference stating that what they were doing was a complete hoax?
And it immediately shut down their laboratory.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

I wrote "stand in front of him". Do you understand what that means?

---

Figuratively, and that's all you get with a message board.

You want Real World?

Look elsewhere.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soxfan

Let the r-e-dietz put on his lucky fedora and get to the bottom of thing, hey hey.

---

The ditz always comes up with some nonsense reasons to squash the meeting.

He demanded a notarized affidavit from Singer's wife, or some such bullshit, before he would meet with Rob.

---

Incorrect. I thought with your photographic memory, coach, you'd have the details correct.

I required verifying directly with Singer's wife on the phone or via a zoom call that she would be in attendance. That was it.