Using AI to craft posts

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Don Perignom

Message boards fundamentally exist for human-to-human connection and discourse. When AI-generated content floods these spaces, it risks several key aspects of authentic community interaction:

First, AI can produce content at a scale and speed that drowns out human voices. One AI could theoretically generate thousands of posts per minute, potentially overwhelming genuine human discussions and derailing natural conversation flows.

Second, AI responses can create a false sense of engagement. While they may be grammatically perfect and superficially relevant, they lack the lived experience, emotional investment, and genuine stakes that make human discourse meaningful. This could lead to sterile, hollow interactions that feel more like reading from a script than having a real conversation.

Third, the presence of AI posts makes it harder to trust the authenticity of any interaction. Users might constantly question whether they're engaging with real people or machines, creating a layer of skepticism that undermines the trust essential for genuine community building.

There's also the risk of AI being used to manipulate discussions through coordinated messaging, artificial consensus building, or subtle opinion steering—even if that's not the AI's intended purpose.

---

I see what you did there...

Ha.

PYB, love your work, man, love your work.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

PYB, love your work, man, love your work.

---

Too bad that he's not very bright. Ha.

V, you should come out of retirement, to earn some more money, and, recreate the illusion of relevancy. But, remember, it's far better to be harmless, than helpless.

AI-created posts are #1,342,629 on the list of problems with the content on this forum.

I would love to just see a forum where less than 60% of the content isn't about MDawg and kewlJ.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Back to MrV's original point of this thread. I don't believe Mdogis actually using AI to generate his trolling posts. he is sitting there like the troll that he is waiting to pounce.

BUT if he was, should that be allowed? Bots are not allowed and Dan does a reasonable job of cleaning them out and trying to prevent them. Wouldn't AI generated posts be almost the same thing. Different branch of the same tree?

---

Kew, wake up for a change. If these people are saying mdawg uses AI, then he's using it. All you're trying to do is what you always do: you're trying to appear smarter than a bag of rocks--which you obviously are not--and you're trying to dismiss the truth that comes within every quote that he cleverly keeps reminding you of.

If you're offended by the accuracy with which mdawg portrays what a fool you appear to be to this forum's administrator as well as to others who've commented on your bullshit in the past, swallow hard. Yes, you are a serial lying, story-concocting jealous moron who is nothing more than just another low-life degenerate gambler living in LV--of which there are plenty.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

AI-created posts are #1,342,629 on the list of problems with the content on this forum.

I would love to just see a forum where less than 60% of the content isn't about MDawg and kewlJ.

---

I said this on here three months ago -- that it was just months before most of what anyone is responding to on forums is AI-generated, so people pressing their AI switches will have others wasting energy and life-minutes typing responses to auto-responses the responders don't know are auto-responses.

While eliminating "handles" ameliorates some of this (if people are putting real-person signatures on AI-generated content, at least they are taking some responsibility), people are too addicted to their forum-life anonymous swashbuckling to actually put their real monikers to their content. Everyone plays pretend, whether it's white dudes who are part-time gamblers pretending to be Asian-omniscient or pretend full-time blackjack players who like to tell everyone "how Las Vegas works" or gambling experts who have conquered everything from penny slots to blackjack to sports gambling as next-generation Leonardo Da APs.

If people were tagged with their real names, their real life-circumstances would create a counter-narrative to their swashbuckling online omniscience.

But don't worry. It'll get worse. Next up comes video content on YouTube with AI-generated experts posting numerous videos of how to win at everything. And the AI-generated content will be indistinguishable from real humans. My estimate is that we're about two years out from that (not counting porn, which is ahead of the curve, as always).

Look at the bright side, however. Someday we'll get some social-psychological studies measuring physico-chemical differences between posting as yourself versus posting as Batman. We'll find out if posting under an anonymous handle depresses your hormones or boosts them. Are you sliding down the social hierarchical scale and behaving accordingly in real life because you are too fearful to be yourself online, or are you boosting your hormones because you get to play pretend the majority of the day (you know, like a mental institute patient)? Should be fascinating stuff.

The bottom line, however, is it really has become pointless to respond to anonymous handles. You are more and more likely to just be talking to yourself. My prediction is that you are going to find subset forums popping up where everyone uses their actual names (like, you know, the old phone book white pages). Niche forums and sites where people are real. I think as this happens, the behavioral problems that come with huge chunks of human communication being anonymous are going to be discussed more and more. We may discover that the explosion in autism has more to do with behavioral training than with purely physico-chemical profiles.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

AI-created posts are #1,342,629 on the list of problems with the content on this forum.

I would love to just see a forum where less than 60% of the content isn't about MDawg and kewlJ.

---

I said this on here three months ago -- that it was just months before most of what anyone is responding to on forums is AI-generated, so people pressing their AI switches will have others wasting energy and life-minutes typing responses to auto-responses the responders don't know are auto-responses.

While eliminating "handles" ameliorates some of this (if people are putting real-person signatures on AI-generated content, at least they are taking some responsibility), people are too addicted to their forum-life anonymous swashbuckling to actually put their real monikers to their content. Everyone plays pretend, whether it's white dudes who are part-time gamblers pretending to be Asian-omniscient or pretend full-time blackjack players who like to tell everyone "how Las Vegas works" or gambling experts who have conquered everything from penny slots to blackjack to sports gambling as next-generation Leonardo Da APs.

If people were tagged with their real names, their real life-circumstances would create a counter-narrative to their swashbuckling online omniscience.

But don't worry. It'll get worse. Next up comes video content on YouTube with AI-generated experts posting numerous videos of how to win at everything. And the AI-generated content will be indistinguishable from real humans. My estimate is that we're about two years out from that (not counting porn, which is ahead of the curve, as always).

Look at the bright side, however. Someday we'll get some social-psychological studies measuring physico-chemical differences between posting as yourself versus posting as Batman. We'll find out if posting under an anonymous handle depresses your hormones or boosts them. Are you sliding down the social hierarchical scale and behaving accordingly in real life because you are too fearful to be yourself online, or are you boosting your hormones because you get to play pretend the majority of the day (you know, like a mental institute patient)? Should be fascinating stuff.

The bottom line, however, is it really has become pointless to respond to anonymous handles. You are more and more likely to just be talking to yourself. My prediction is that you are going to find subset forums popping up where everyone uses their actual names (like, you know, the old phone book white pages). Niche forums and sites where people are real. I think as this happens, the behavioral problems that come with huge chunks of human communication being anonymous are going to be discussed more and more. We may discover that the explosion in autism has more to do with behavioral training than with purely physico-chemical profiles.

---

Amazing how wrong you are. Most APs on here don't talk of tales... kewl, Singer, mdawg, the baccarat guy, then you come in at 5th. This post is so stupid on so many levels I'm not going to begin to list them.

Redietz's crusade against anonymity on message boards and his arguments seem an exercise in futility.

Given the political, social and cultural divisions in America requiring a poster to post their name and city of residence would likely lead to unwanted physical contact, including attacks in the real world by disgruntled or mentally disturbed readers.

Just look at redietz's and Singer's / Argentino's fate: their antagonists have unearthed and posted embarrassing personal info about each of them.

Not that anonymity guarantees insulation: the hound regularly dumps buckets of shit on KJ, for example.

The Doors sang it best: "People are Strange..."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

UNKewlJ is shivering under the ragged covers in his homeless tunnel after being once again rebuffed by his idol Dan the Dandruff Man.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jdog

Gentlemen, at this point I'm starting to think kewl is possibly bipolar. When these people are in a manic state they are often delusional.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Redietz's crusade against anonymity on message boards and his arguments seem an exercise in futility.

Given the political, social and cultural divisions in America requiring a poster to post their name and city of residence would likely lead to unwanted physical contact, including attacks disgruntled or mentally disturbed readers.

Just look at redietz's and Singer's / Argentino's fate: their antagonists have unearthed and posted embarrasssing personal info about each of them.

Not that anonymity guarantees insulation: the hound regularly dumps buckets of shit on KJ, for example.

The Doors sang it best: "People are Strange..."

---

There are so many reasons to not use your full name to the world. One of them is free speech. Anonymity is a big feature of free speech in these contexts. It really isn't worth listing all of them. I pressed ditz on this and pushed and the only thing he could come up with are "opportunities".

I'm sure redietz can find a forum where someone is checking id and making it line up with the username but go see how great it is. Crazy. Things like being swatted and such by some crazy. Why? I have people out there who really really don't like me. I speak my mind. I don't suffer fools and thieves and other sorts very well. There are a few people out there who hate me. Why the fuck would i want to put my name there? Why would I ever wish to talk about personal things with the world? Without your name - you can do whatever. That isn't necessarily good but it sure has a lot of positives.

For instance the guy with the 9 inch cock that seemed like a psycho. He was kinda funny but at one point it appears he went through my posts going way back thinking he'd be able to out me. I'm pretty good about avoiding any identifying details even if someone I know fairly well was to read this. They might be able to pick off it was me but they'd need to know me very well. Regardless, I can talk about whatever to my heart's content.

It would make people more friendly though but it wouldn't be near as fun. This website would likely be dead but perhaps people who live vegas casinos would be all over.. but there really isn't that much to talk about if you stick to vegas + casinos.

Redietz on the other hand just wants to talk about himself and pump himself up in some manner. He has no desire for a higher level of communication where poeple share all sorts of weird shit. I for sure don't want to share weird shit

He really just wants leverage of some sort. Look at how he did that to Kim Lee. THe <wink><wink> I know who you really are thing.

This idea that Kewl would want to use his real name if he was who he said. Thats just stupid.

Redietz though is a tout and so he is here to try and drum up business. He's advertising. No one else is. He doesn't grasp that.

.
dupe

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Redietz's crusade against anonymity on message boards and his arguments seem an exercise in futility.

Given the political, social and cultural divisions in America requiring a poster to post their name and city of residence would likely lead to unwanted physical contact, including attacks disgruntled or mentally disturbed readers.

Just look at redietz's and Singer's / Argentino's fate: their antagonists have unearthed and posted embarrasssing personal info about each of them.

Not that anonymity guarantees insulation: the hound regularly dumps buckets of shit on KJ, for example.

The Doors sang it best: "People are Strange..."

---

There are so many reasons to not use your full name to the world. One of them is free speech. Anonymity is a big feature of free speech in these contexts. It really isn't worth listing all of them. I pressed ditz on this and pushed and the only thing he could come up with are "opportunities".

I'm sure redietz can find a forum where someone is checking id and making it line up with the username but go see how great it is. Crazy. Things like being swatted and such by some crazy. Why? I have people out there who really really don't like me. I speak my mind. I don't suffer fools and thieves and other sorts very well. There are a few people out there who hate me. Why the fuck would i want to put my name there? Why would I ever wish to talk about personal things with the world? Without your name - you can do whatever. That isn't necessarily good but it sure has a lot of positives.

For instance the guy with the 9 inch cock that seemed like a psycho. He was kinda funny but at one point it appears he went through my posts going way back thinking he'd be able to out me. I'm pretty good about avoiding any identifying details even if someone I know fairly well was to read this. They might be able to pick off it was me but they'd need to know me very well. Regardless, I can talk about whatever to my heart's content.

It would make people more friendly though but it wouldn't be near as fun. This website would likely be dead but perhaps people who live vegas casinos would be all over.. but there really isn't that much to talk about if you stick to vegas + casinos.

Redietz on the other hand just wants to talk about himself and pump himself up in some manner. He has no desire for a higher level of communication where poeple share all sorts of weird shit. I for sure don't want to share weird shit

He really just wants leverage of some sort. Look at how he did that to Kim Lee. THe <wink><wink> I know who you really are thing.

This idea that Kewl would want to use his real name if he was who he said. Thats just stupid.

Redietz though is a tout and so he is here to try and drum up business. He's advertising. No one else is. He doesn't grasp that.

---

An investment tout not using his real name would be like an investment banker not using his real name. Using his real name is just a tailored necessary sales tactic to help get investors. Hey, look at me, I'm different, and you can trust me since I'm using my real name.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Redietz's crusade against anonymity on message boards and his arguments seem an exercise in futility.

Given the political, social and cultural divisions in America requiring a poster to post their name and city of residence would likely lead to unwanted physical contact, including attacks disgruntled or mentally disturbed readers.

Just look at redietz's and Singer's / Argentino's fate: their antagonists have unearthed and posted embarrasssing personal info about each of them.

Not that anonymity guarantees insulation: the hound regularly dumps buckets of shit on KJ, for example.

The Doors sang it best: "People are Strange..."

---

There are so many reasons to not use your full name to the world. One of them is free speech. Anonymity is a big feature of free speech in these contexts. It really isn't worth listing all of them. I pressed ditz on this and pushed and the only thing he could come up with are "opportunities".

I'm sure redietz can find a forum where someone is checking id and making it line up with the username but go see how great it is. Crazy. Things like being swatted and such by some crazy. Why? I have people out there who really really don't like me. I speak my mind. I don't suffer fools and thieves and other sorts very well. There are a few people out there who hate me. Why the fuck would i want to put my name there? Why would I ever wish to talk about personal things with the world? Without your name - you can do whatever. That isn't necessarily good but it sure has a lot of positives.

For instance the guy with the 9 inch cock that seemed like a psycho. He was kinda funny but at one point it appears he went through my posts going way back thinking he'd be able to out me. I'm pretty good about avoiding any identifying details even if someone I know fairly well was to read this. They might be able to pick off it was me but they'd need to know me very well. Regardless, I can talk about whatever to my heart's content.

It would make people more friendly though but it wouldn't be near as fun. This website would likely be dead but perhaps people who live vegas casinos would be all over.. but there really isn't that much to talk about if you stick to vegas + casinos.

Redietz on the other hand just wants to talk about himself and pump himself up in some manner. He has no desire for a higher level of communication where poeple share all sorts of weird shit. I for sure don't want to share weird shit

He really just wants leverage of some sort. Look at how he did that to Kim Lee. THe <wink><wink> I know who you really are thing.

This idea that Kewl would want to use his real name if he was who he said. Thats just stupid.

Redietz though is a tout and so he is here to try and drum up business. He's advertising. No one else is. He doesn't grasp that.

---

An investment tout not using his real name would be like an investment banker not using his real name. Using his real name is just a tailored necessary sales tactic to help get investors. Hey, look at me, I'm different, and you can trust me since I'm using my real name.

---

You guys do know that I've been retired for years and haven't taken on a new client for about a decade? No, you don't know that?

Well, I guess I've only mentioned that half a dozen times. Sorry you missed it. All you had to do was ask.

Yeah, I'm drumming up business left and right. College football specialist on God forsaken forum trying to drum up business after not taking on any new clients in a decade. Makes perfect sense.

You folks are so spot on, it's frightening. I mean, really, have you ever seen one post along those lines or heard one report from anyone on any forum that I tried to "drum up business?" If you haven't, I think you either owe me an apology, or you need to come clean about how idiotic your comments are. All these years, all these posts, and I never approached anyone about anything. But your insightful conclusion is that I'm trying to drum up business.

What is the point of making comments about someone that are completely lacking in any evidence or logic? WTF? Classic nonsense coming from account and Axelwolf, the flagship "APs." Are all "APs" this stupid or this dishonest? Yeah, I'll brag about my 56+% lifetime college ATS mark -- that's the ticket. That'll appeal to all the civilians. Holy fuck; how disingenuous are you? You cannot be this dumb.

Maybe if you retracted your retarded statement that EV is irrelevant to profitable sports betting then some people would take you more seriously.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

There are so many reasons to not use your full name to the world. One of them is free speech. Anonymity is a big feature of free speech in these contexts. It really isn't worth listing all of them. I pressed ditz on this and pushed and the only thing he could come up with are "opportunities".

I'm sure redietz can find a forum where someone is checking id and making it line up with the username but go see how great it is. Crazy. Things like being swatted and such by some crazy. Why? I have people out there who really really don't like me. I speak my mind. I don't suffer fools and thieves and other sorts very well. There are a few people out there who hate me. Why the fuck would i want to put my name there? Why would I ever wish to talk about personal things with the world? Without your name - you can do whatever. That isn't necessarily good but it sure has a lot of positives.

For instance the guy with the 9 inch cock that seemed like a psycho. He was kinda funny but at one point it appears he went through my posts going way back thinking he'd be able to out me. I'm pretty good about avoiding any identifying details even if someone I know fairly well was to read this. They might be able to pick off it was me but they'd need to know me very well. Regardless, I can talk about whatever to my heart's content.

It would make people more friendly though but it wouldn't be near as fun. This website would likely be dead but perhaps people who live vegas casinos would be all over.. but there really isn't that much to talk about if you stick to vegas + casinos.

Redietz on the other hand just wants to talk about himself and pump himself up in some manner. He has no desire for a higher level of communication where poeple share all sorts of weird shit. I for sure don't want to share weird shit

He really just wants leverage of some sort. Look at how he did that to Kim Lee. THe <wink><wink> I know who you really are thing.

This idea that Kewl would want to use his real name if he was who he said. Thats just stupid.

Redietz though is a tout and so he is here to try and drum up business. He's advertising. No one else is. He doesn't grasp that.

---

An investment tout not using his real name would be like an investment banker not using his real name. Using his real name is just a tailored necessary sales tactic to help get investors. Hey, look at me, I'm different, and you can trust me since I'm using my real name.

---

You guys do know that I've been retired for years and haven't taken on a new client for about a decade? No, you don't know that?

Well, I guess I've only mentioned that half a dozen times. Sorry you missed it. All you had to do was ask.

Yeah, I'm drumming up business left and right. College football specialist on God forsaken forum trying to drum up business after not taking on any new clients in a decade. Makes perfect sense.

You folks are so spot on, it's frightening. I mean, really, have you ever seen one post along those lines or heard one report from anyone on any forum that I tried to "drum up business?" If you haven't, I think you either owe me an apology, or you need to come clean about how idiotic your comments are. All these years, all these posts, and I never approached anyone about anything. But your insightful conclusion is that I'm trying to drum up business.

What is the point of making comments about someone that are completely lacking in any evidence or logic? WTF? Classic nonsense coming from account and Axelwolf, the flagship "APs." Are all "APs" this stupid or this dishonest? Yeah, I'll brag about my 56+% lifetime college ATS mark -- that's the ticket. That'll appeal to all the civilians. Holy fuck; how disingenuous are you? You cannot be this dumb.

---

Okay, then add past tense to my post. Not taking on any NEW clients because you are retired. Aside from some extra accounting, isn't it the same amount of work regardless of how many clients you have? Or was/is all the main work mostly dedicated to touting yourself while recruiting and pitching potential clients?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

You guys do know that I've been retired for years and haven't taken on a new client for about a decade? No, you don't know that?

Well, I guess I've only mentioned that half a dozen times. Sorry you missed it. All you had to do was ask.

Yeah, I'm drumming up business left and right. College football specialist on God forsaken forum trying to drum up business after not taking on any new clients in a decade. Makes perfect sense.

You folks are so spot on, it's frightening. I mean, really, have you ever seen one post along those lines or heard one report from anyone on any forum that I tried to "drum up business?" If you haven't, I think you either owe me an apology, or you need to come clean about how idiotic your comments are. All these years, all these posts, and I never approached anyone about anything. But your insightful conclusion is that I'm trying to drum up business.

What is the point of making comments about someone that are completely lacking in any evidence or logic? WTF? Classic nonsense coming from account and Axelwolf, the flagship "APs." Are all "APs" this stupid or this dishonest? Yeah, I'll brag about my 56+% lifetime college ATS mark -- that's the ticket. That'll appeal to all the civilians. Holy fuck; how disingenuous are you? You cannot be this dumb.

---

your word is no good here. Post some proof of 56%.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

I'll brag about my 56+% lifetime college ATS mark -- that's the ticket. That'll appeal to all the civilians. Holy fuck; how disingenuous are you? You cannot be this dumb.

---

your word is no good here. Post some proof of 56%.

---

If Redietz really had a 56+% lifetime college ATS mark, he wouldn't have needed clients or investors. That would have been a waste of time and effort. He simply would have bet, bet, bet, and never looked back. He would be a millionaire several to many times over, even ignoring Kelly, and betting cautiously or conservatively.

That we have to keep going over this really is retarded.

And if he has a 56+% mark, or anything close to it in college football, that is cherry picked. Why college football? The most likely scenario is he started out betting college football, NFL, MLB, NHL, NBA, college basketball. Didn't do well in most of them, so he cherry picked college football results to talk about. Also didn't do well in bowl games. So, let's not talk about that either. Just cherry pick the one thing he did well and only talk about the few years he did well. THAT is precisely what "cherry-picking" is about.

What is by some strange anomaly, a blackjack player, had a return on investment (we really don't measure by that, but lets say we did) of 180% on a 6 deck game at xxx casino. But at 9 casino's with very similar games, conditions, rules penetration, RoI was 100% or even less in several cases. When asked about results, can we cherry-pick and only mention the one casinos?

Come on man!!!

And by the way, a blackjack player, a serious player, does break down results by casino like that. Only so if you see an odd result over a long period of time like that, you might want to really take notice as to whether you might be being cheated. OR you might just want to stop playing that casino altogether for a while, or at least play less. But you can't just pretend that these returns didn't happen or don't count and talk about the good results.

And that goes for YOU too, Mdog!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kim Lee

My grinder friends like KewlJ moved to Vegas, accumulated significant bankrolls, and bought homes. You beat one sport in the 1980's, betting .7% of your meager bankroll.

---