VitalVegas made nasty remarks about Charlie Kirk after the shooting

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

AQ, I'm not seeing that you even come close to comprehending why people like you don't like or appreciate people like Charlie Kirk...or even his wife.

First, they were happily married and they had two cute kids. Being alone and lonely your entire life, "getting it" doesn't ever enter into the equation for you.

Next: it seems to irk you that a self-educated Charlie Kirk could consistently out-debate--always while articulating facts--with however many strange mensa-level liberals the colleges could throw at him. And he did it with aplomb.

Next: without the amazing & non-stop efforts of TPUSA educating so many new and young voters, our great President Donald Trump would be a political prisoner, Spanish would be the country's official language, our female sports programs would all be in deterioration mode before ceasing to exist, we'd get even more obnoxious trans & faggot couples and minorities in TV commercials, shows, movies etc.

Lastly: Erika Kirk. You have no idea what the lady's going thru right now, first because you've never loved anyone but yourself, and then because you've no idea how much the surviving spouse's heart aches over knowing their children will never have really known their father--who is widely acknowledged world-wide as being a very good man.

Sure she's a former beauty contestant, a piece of ass as her critics stupidly call her trying their best to be derogatory, and a devout Christian (something else that irks you??) but she's held herself together pretty well with all the pressure she's under. All that nonsense of no tears and looking up to the sky blah blah blah----that's just losers venting bs who got continuously ticked off at Charlie Kirk's ripping liberals a new one.

And guess what? IT'S ALL RELATED TO A SERIOUS CASE OF TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME!

And I love it!!! :)

---

lol avoiding the issues and attacking me. Why would we expect anything more?

THe dude was a professional debater. "Self-educated", sure. He also uses debate tactics that are questionable. Regardless of that, this is the one thing I admired about the guy. So no - it doesn't irk me did that. This is what was admirable, chief doofus.

Again, my gf is almost guaranteed more accomplished and attractive than your wife. Who would marry a guy who looks like you and is a gambling addict in denial about how much they've lost their whole fucking life?

Seriously. Who?

You take pictures in the some monitor faking your big wins and concoct stories around that. Then you are mad because people believed Kewl for 10+ years. Don't take your failures out on him.

I'm not sure what you mean about "getting it" and how that relates to my views on her and this situation.

Where is the rest of his family in all this? Why aren't they involved? This woman is just a chief attention grabber.

I will say I've never had a spouse die but I understand the grieving of women because I've broke up with a few of them. You'll laugh hard and I get that too but it sucks for them. That isn't the same as death but I've seen it and never like putting women through that.

Also - Kirk very often got his facts wrong but you can make up infinite facts on the spot and if there isn't a way to be fact-checked - it is just passed over.

Me thinking this woman is a bit of a phoney has nothing to do with my opinions on Trump but you worship that idiot then fine, do so. He is a joke to the rest of the world with his UN speeches.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I did a deep dive on one of the quotes the liberals spread around and it was basically what it said. He had a podcast you can cherry pick reasonable stuff from but he's pretty awful. His wife is incredibly fake. Won a beauty pageant of Trumps. Just very into her looks and now that weird fake crying and performance stuff where she raises her head to the heavens choreographed to the music. So fake and gay.

---

I'm just going to go Dragnet on you here. I've probably read 10 times the material on verbal and non-verbal presentation that you have. I've probably read 20 times the academic papers on the same topics. But does that make me an expert? No, it does not.

So what I recommend you do is survey Youtube (you know, with your usual two-minute commitment to "research") and pull up analyses of this widow's speech by professionals in the non-verbal and forensic interviewing fields. FBI guys and CIA guys and so on. Then listen to what they have to say. Some of it is very detailed.

And this is the issue I have with you, account. Once again, you presume you know something when you have no actual expertise, you have minimal training, and you have minimal exposure to what you are talking about. You do this repeatedly regarding every subject under the sun. You know sports gambling about as well as you know non-verbal forensics.

And this is also why people should post under their real names. So they don't get to play at having some kind of expertise when they have none. You are so far off base on this one that it's embarrassing. And yeah, nobody loves an uber-Christian beauty queen, but that doesn't mean she's faking who she is or what she feels.

You know, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that listening to non-verbal professionals analyzing a public speech might shed some light on it. The questions I have are (1) why spout about something without consulting what professionals have to say? and (2) what kind of thinking leads to the strategy of not investigating what professionals think?

This comes down to the basic "I'm Leonardo Da AP. I know it all."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Who gives a shit, Rob you big ugly doofus. It is supposed to be a gambling forum. No one cares about your man crush on Trump.

And some of you people are about to find out just what your hero has done for you in about 2 weeks when SS COLA is announced at about 2.7%, way less than half what inflation really is. And that is before a 12% raise in you medicate premium next year.

So Trump will be taking upwards of $100 from all retirees (including my mother), while continuing to enrich himself with every single thing he does. Hidden in the details of EVERY stroke of his pen is something that enriches Trump. EVERYTHING!

So go ahead and celebrate as Trump takes from you to enrich himself. Fucking moron!

---

Rob has the other side of TDS. Trump Dick Sucking. (thats for you, belly)

Trump is fucking hte lower classes and they're going to hate him in 3 years after inflation kicks in. The tech businesses will offshore the jobs over hiring lesser skilled AMericans in tech. These Trump people don't get that. India has 5x the people we do and tech companies were able to hire quality without paying as much. But all those jobs can be done overseas.

No one is going to invest in manufacturing because there is no guarantee the tariff will stick around to protect the business. It'll take years.

So many small businesses going to fail because they can't find the labor to do them. I was just talking the other day to my gf and her small business owner friend. That woman tries to hire white Americans but it never works out. Turns out white men don't want to work out in the hot sun of Summer for $22 an hour.

All these Trump people think if the wages are raised the jobs will magically be filled! But there aren't enough people around anymore. It is all just simple thinking. Point at immigrants and tell your followers they're victimizing you when in general we are taking advantage of them.

The worst of it all though are the tax cuts for the wealthy. Those are the reasons gold and BTC are going up - so many people understand all these things. All these extra taxes on the lower classes and wealthy just get more and more assets for Private Equity and to buy up every house that people want so they'll be enslaved as rentors.

It is all so fucked but in 3 years Trump will not be a popular man. He can hide it all he wants by fucking with government reports and firing anyoen who won't lie for him but it'll be painfully obvious.

He has done a few useful things .. and even the imimigration needed to be done .. I believe Singer was a government employee. Just some big thing wrote him a check and thats all he ever understood. Typical

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I did a deep dive on one of the quotes the liberals spread around and it was basically what it said. He had a podcast you can cherry pick reasonable stuff from but he's pretty awful. His wife is incredibly fake. Won a beauty pageant of Trumps. Just very into her looks and now that weird fake crying and performance stuff where she raises her head to the heavens choreographed to the music. So fake and gay.

---

I'm just going to go Dragnet on you here. I've probably read 10 times the material on verbal and non-verbal presentation that you have. I've probably read 20 times the academic papers on the same topics. But does that make me an expert? No, it does not.

So what I recommend you do is survey Youtube (you know, with your usual two-minute commitment to "research") and pull up analyses of this widow's speech by professionals in the non-verbal and forensic interviewing fields. FBI guys and CIA guys and so on. Then listen to what they have to say. Some of it is very detailed.

And this is the issue I have with you, account. Once again, you presume you know something when you have no actual expertise, you have minimal training, and you have minimal exposure to what you are talking about. You do this repeatedly regarding every subject under the sun. You know sports gambling about as well as you know non-verbal forensics.

And this is also why people should post under their real names. So they don't get to play at having some kind of expertise when they have none. You are so far off base on this one that it's embarrassing. And yeah, nobody loves an uber-Christian beauty queen, but that doesn't mean she's faking who she is or what she feels.

You know, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that listening to non-verbal professionals analyzing a public speech might shed some light on it. The questions I have are (1) why spout about something without consulting what professionals have to say? and (2) what kind of thinking leads to the strategy of not investigating what professionals think?

This comes down to the basic "I'm Leonardo Da AP. I know it all."

---

You have dementia. Log off.

Seriously this is insane. These are objective opinions. FBI and CIA opinions on what? Those guys aren't on youtube talking about this. You're pulled in by so many fakers. "Experts". Good grief.

I pointed out how you are wrong about sports betting, asked the same questions 3 times and was ignored 3 times. So I give up and now you're back with telling me how I don't understand sports betting? You ran off and hid from the questions because you KNEW you were wrong. Stop being such a loser.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I did a deep dive on one of the quotes the liberals spread around and it was basically what it said. He had a podcast you can cherry pick reasonable stuff from but he's pretty awful. His wife is incredibly fake. Won a beauty pageant of Trumps. Just very into her looks and now that weird fake crying and performance stuff where she raises her head to the heavens choreographed to the music. So fake and gay.

---

I'm just going to go Dragnet on you here. I've probably read 10 times the material on verbal and non-verbal presentation that you have. I've probably read 20 times the academic papers on the same topics. But does that make me an expert? No, it does not.

So what I recommend you do is survey Youtube (you know, with your usual two-minute commitment to "research") and pull up analyses of this widow's speech by professionals in the non-verbal and forensic interviewing fields. FBI guys and CIA guys and so on. Then listen to what they have to say. Some of it is very detailed.

And this is the issue I have with you, account. Once again, you presume you know something when you have no actual expertise, you have minimal training, and you have minimal exposure to what you are talking about. You do this repeatedly regarding every subject under the sun. You know sports gambling about as well as you know non-verbal forensics.

And this is also why people should post under their real names. So they don't get to play at having some kind of expertise when they have none. You are so far off base on this one that it's embarrassing. And yeah, nobody loves an uber-Christian beauty queen, but that doesn't mean she's faking who she is or what she feels.

You know, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that listening to non-verbal professionals analyzing a public speech might shed some light on it. The questions I have are (1) why spout about something without consulting what professionals have to say? and (2) what kind of thinking leads to the strategy of not investigating what professionals think?

This comes down to the basic "I'm Leonardo Da AP. I know it all."

---

You have dementia. Log off.

Seriously this is insane. These are objective opinions. FBI and CIA opinions on what? Those guys aren't on youtube talking about this. You're pulled in by so many fakers. "Experts". Good grief.

I pointed out how you are wrong about sports betting, asked the same questions 3 times and was ignored 3 times. So I give up and now you're back with telling me how I don't understand sports betting? You ran off and hid from the questions because you KNEW you were wrong. Stop being such a loser.

---

You have zero idea what you're talking about.

Here's a thought. I think you mentioned that your GF is a prosecutor or judge. Have her read what I just wrote.

She's going to agree with me.

To be clear - this idea of victimhood being pushed upon people by Trump and the right. You seem to feel victimized that I don't think this woman is grieving.

Oh I believe she is grieving. I am sure she is very upset. That is not what i am saying. I am saying the need for her to be in center of the spotlight is far more strong than it'd be in a normal great woman like she is portrayed to be. It is weird as fuck. I have rightwing friends who have told me the same. She is not like normal people. She wanted to be in the influencer game and be someone. Why else do you end up in videos for being pretty and at beauty pageants? It isn't that common. I'm not even sure she is faking it beyond having a feeling of "this is how I'm supposed to behave to rally the troops and keep his power in my clutches".

But you guys play the part you're told to play .. and you don't even know it.

What grieving widows go up in front of everyone and put on some big production? Where is the rest of the family? Whatever - I don't care ultimately. She isn't important to me.

What I find crazy is how everyone is rewriting all the stuff CHarlie Kirk was about. He was about a lot of things and he said some really nasty things. Sure, he'd be fine on VCT but the world shouldn't be modelled after VCT.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

I'm just going to go Dragnet on you here. I've probably read 10 times the material on verbal and non-verbal presentation that you have. I've probably read 20 times the academic papers on the same topics. But does that make me an expert? No, it does not.

So what I recommend you do is survey Youtube (you know, with your usual two-minute commitment to "research") and pull up analyses of this widow's speech by professionals in the non-verbal and forensic interviewing fields. FBI guys and CIA guys and so on. Then listen to what they have to say. Some of it is very detailed.

And this is the issue I have with you, account. Once again, you presume you know something when you have no actual expertise, you have minimal training, and you have minimal exposure to what you are talking about. You do this repeatedly regarding every subject under the sun. You know sports gambling about as well as you know non-verbal forensics.

And this is also why people should post under their real names. So they don't get to play at having some kind of expertise when they have none. You are so far off base on this one that it's embarrassing. And yeah, nobody loves an uber-Christian beauty queen, but that doesn't mean she's faking who she is or what she feels.

You know, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that listening to non-verbal professionals analyzing a public speech might shed some light on it. The questions I have are (1) why spout about something without consulting what professionals have to say? and (2) what kind of thinking leads to the strategy of not investigating what professionals think?

This comes down to the basic "I'm Leonardo Da AP. I know it all."

---

You have dementia. Log off.

Seriously this is insane. These are objective opinions. FBI and CIA opinions on what? Those guys aren't on youtube talking about this. You're pulled in by so many fakers. "Experts". Good grief.

I pointed out how you are wrong about sports betting, asked the same questions 3 times and was ignored 3 times. So I give up and now you're back with telling me how I don't understand sports betting? You ran off and hid from the questions because you KNEW you were wrong. Stop being such a loser.

---

You have zero idea what you're talking about.

Here's a thought. I think you mentioned that your GF is a prosecutor or judge. Have her read what I just wrote.

She's going to agree with me.

---

Unfortunately I seem to know more about sports betting and we'll leave it there. If I didn't - you'd ridiculed me for my questions but you knew I was right and your logic was flawed and so you ran off and avoided answering the questions.

When the RAID can has sputtered empty the roaches come back out to play.

And no, she's an attorney. She doesn't do anything with criminal law. I don't think she goes to Youtube for expertise.

In prior times you ridiculed people for google searching and youtubing as "research". Now it is your gold standard.

Give us a break.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

To be clear - this idea of victimhood being pushed upon people by Trump and the right. You seem to feel victimized that I don't think this woman is grieving.

Oh I believe she is grieving. I am sure she is very upset. That is not what i am saying. I am saying the need for her to be in center of the spotlight is far more strong than it'd be in a normal great woman like she is portrayed to be. It is weird as fuck. I have rightwing friends who have told me the same. She is not like normal people. She wanted to be in the influencer game and be someone. Why else do you end up in videos for being pretty and at beauty pageants? It isn't that common. I'm not even sure she is faking it beyond having a feeling of "this is how I'm supposed to behave to rally the troops and keep his power in my clutches".

But you guys play the part you're told to play .. and you don't even know it.

What grieving widows go up in front of everyone and put on some big production? Where is the rest of the family? Whatever - I don't care ultimately. She isn't important to me.

What I find crazy is how everyone is rewriting all the stuff CHarlie Kirk was about. He was about a lot of things and he said some really nasty things. Sure, he'd be fine on VCT but the world shouldn't be modelled after VCT.

---

Don't invent reasons or interpretations of what I wrote. Stop that nonsense.

I am saying that your proclamations regarding Kirk's widow's self-presentation are, according to forensic body language and speech analysis experts, completely wrong.

You gave a strong opinion with no expertise to back it up. You get upset when I tell you that experts in the fields came to completely different conclusions than you did.

You do this stuff all the time. You presume expertise you do not have, and then attack people who point out that you have very little idea what you are talking about. It's ridiculous and gets old.

Go show your GF what I wrote and then report her reaction. You are just dead wrong on this. You decided to have an opinion out of the thin air of your mind, and you were wrong.

Ask your GF.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

To be clear - this idea of victimhood being pushed upon people by Trump and the right. You seem to feel victimized that I don't think this woman is grieving.

Oh I believe she is grieving. I am sure she is very upset. That is not what i am saying. I am saying the need for her to be in center of the spotlight is far more strong than it'd be in a normal great woman like she is portrayed to be. It is weird as fuck. I have rightwing friends who have told me the same. She is not like normal people. She wanted to be in the influencer game and be someone. Why else do you end up in videos for being pretty and at beauty pageants? It isn't that common. I'm not even sure she is faking it beyond having a feeling of "this is how I'm supposed to behave to rally the troops and keep his power in my clutches".

But you guys play the part you're told to play .. and you don't even know it.

What grieving widows go up in front of everyone and put on some big production? Where is the rest of the family? Whatever - I don't care ultimately. She isn't important to me.

What I find crazy is how everyone is rewriting all the stuff CHarlie Kirk was about. He was about a lot of things and he said some really nasty things. Sure, he'd be fine on VCT but the world shouldn't be modelled after VCT.

---

Don't invent reasons or interpretations of what I wrote. Stop that nonsense.

I am saying that your proclamations regarding Kirk's widow's self-presentation are, according to forensic body language and speech analysis experts, completely wrong.

You gave a strong opinion with no expertise to back it up. You get upset when I tell you that experts in the fields came to completely different conclusions than you did.

You do this stuff all the time. You presume expertise you do not have, and then attack people who point out that you have very little idea what you are talking about. It's ridiculous and gets old.

Go show your GF what I wrote and then report her reaction. You are just dead wrong on this. You decided to have an opinion out of the thin air of your mind, and you were wrong.

Ask your GF.

---

I have decades of experience observing people lol. gtfo.

I'm the one who started to really call out poor kewl. I have a pretty eye for nonsense of various types.

Although I'm not believing what she is doing is bullshit but I don't think she behaves like a normal traditional wife would behave. Regardless of however it is wanting to be spun. I don't care what the FBI and CIA on Youtube tell you.

I'm curious who these experts are. The right pandering side if you want to gain longterm views is just to pander and not say anything critical. Oh they worked for the FBI ! They say she's a good honest hard working America.

You can tell who the shitty rats are when fascism starts to lower on your country.

Ma? The FBI? Just like on Tee Vee ?

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

No son, like on Youtube.

If it wasn't so weird - I would ask my gf her opinion on Erika Kirk. She isn't as nice as I am to Charlie Kirk.

I'm kinda like .. he is my 2nd amendment brother, I pour one out for him. Most on the right just want to be victims these days. Crazy. It is so fucked how everything is framed as conservatives under attack when it is pretty fucking clear what is happening in this country.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I'm the one who started to really call out poor kewl. I have a pretty eye for nonsense of various types.

---

Dude, you really are as delusional as Dietz and Singer. Not to mention the greatest gambler of all time.

What exactly did you "call out about poor old Kewl"? You voiced an opinion or a feeling, with not a single shred of proof.

When I exposed Dawg, I got him to retract 7 months of lies with one line about "being even". He can spin that anyway he wants, but that was "proof" of his lies of all that winning.

When Singer posted those pictures in the Newell that didn't belong to him, MaxPen dug up where that Newel actually was at a dealership. I confirmed it with the manager of that dealership. These things are proof!

What you have is an opinion or feeling about something with not a single shred of proof. It would be like if I said, I think Mickeycrimm was the second shooter of JFK, but could offer not a single piece of evidence, other than my own feeling or opinion.

Until you can offer some kind of proof, don't come at me with this "I called Kewlj out" bullshit. As with most things about you, you are wrong. If this is your great talent, you might want to rethink your life.

And all those years you called redietz arrogant.....and he is! You are 10 times as arrogant as Dietz.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

kewlJ is basically the Boy Who Cried Wolf of these AP forums. He has lied so many times that it's impossible to believe any stories he tells

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

kewlJ is basically the Boy Who Cried Wolf of these AP forums. He has lied so many times that it's impossible to believe any stories he tells

---

---

Return of the Fucktard

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I'm the one who started to really call out poor kewl. I have a pretty eye for nonsense of various types.

---

Dude, you really are as delusional as Dietz and Singer. Not to mention the greatest gambler of all time.

What exactly did you "call out about poor old Kewl"? You voiced an opinion or a feeling, with not a single shred of proof.

When I exposed Dawg, I got him to retract 7 months of lies with one line about "being even". He can spin that anyway he wants, but that was "proof" of his lies of all that winning.

When Singer posted those pictures in the Newell that didn't belong to him, MaxPen dug up where that Newel actually was at a dealership. I confirmed it with the manager of that dealership. These things are proof!

What you have is an opinion or feeling about something with not a single shred of proof. It would be like if I said, I think Mickeycrimm was the second shooter of JFK, but could offer not a single piece of evidence, other than my own feeling or opinion.

Until you can offer some kind of proof, don't come at me with this "I called Kewlj out" bullshit. As with most things about you, you are wrong. If this is your great talent, you might want to rethink your life.

And all those years you called redietz arrogant.....and he is! You are 10 times as arrogant as Dietz.

---

Thats fine bro if you want to act like you exist then knock yourself out.

I remember really calling out the arm story was it was clearly in the 'did not happen' category of stories. Then your credibility took a huge swing down. Whatever. Kewl will be Kewl forever. Good luck at blackjack and whatedver else you are taking on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Who gives a shit, Rob you big ugly doofus. It is supposed to be a gambling forum. No one cares about your man crush on Trump.

And some of you people are about to find out just what your hero has done for you in about 2 weeks when SS COLA is announced at about 2.7%, way less than half what inflation really is. And that is before a 12% raise in you medicate premium next year.

So Trump will be taking upwards of $100 from all retirees (including my mother), while continuing to enrich himself with every single thing he does. Hidden in the details of EVERY stroke of his pen is something that enriches Trump. EVERYTHING!

So go ahead and celebrate as Trump takes from you to enrich himself. Fucking moron!

---

Trump just got prescription drug prices cut in half for the middle class.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Who gives a shit, Rob you big ugly doofus. It is supposed to be a gambling forum. No one cares about your man crush on Trump.

And some of you people are about to find out just what your hero has done for you in about 2 weeks when SS COLA is announced at about 2.7%, way less than half what inflation really is. And that is before a 12% raise in you medicate premium next year.

So Trump will be taking upwards of $100 from all retirees (including my mother), while continuing to enrich himself with every single thing he does. Hidden in the details of EVERY stroke of his pen is something that enriches Trump. EVERYTHING!

So go ahead and celebrate as Trump takes from you to enrich himself. Fucking moron!

---

Trump just got prescription drug prices cut in half for the middle class.

---

Are you saying kew LIED about something?? :)

Kew, COLA means nothing to me. It does to your mommy because your entire family is poor and struggling. AKA: losers.

One of the main democrat lies is Trump is enriching himself with "every stroke of the pen". Articulate accurately to us just 10 examples you've been tracking. C'mon. Just 10, you wimpy fartface.

Here are 7. honestly this shit is endless if you really want to go down the rabbitholes. Trump has signficantly moved the bar on what is considered corruption. Foreign capital will find its way out of the US if we're just as corrupt and now moreso than most countries.

1 Trump has hosted many things at his own property where his hotel charges crazy rates to the US gov.

2 https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/11/polit...-air-force-one. btw they have to dissassembl;e this thing. So many costs.

3 Launched businesses like a social media company. Silly past Presidents - they always looked at being President as a fulltime gig.

4 Scammy crypto currencies.

5 All those gifts of $1 million to his inaugeral ball.

6 Campaigns/PACs have been able to use his properties and real estate to give him money and skirt intent of the law.

7 All these guys settling court cases for big amounts. it is just another way to corrupt the whole system.

I dont' care that he gets even more wealthy but it sucks that we're just becoming a third world crap country by a bunch of poorly educated fools who are bitter that their standard of life didn't match their dads. So they blame the brown guys and vote this clown in when it is obvious to anyone with a thinking brain how bad he is for this country.

I mean didn't he somehow manage to have the deficit go up? Am I wrong? I don't specifically pay much attention to him because it is all settled. If you still think he is particularly competent then good luck. He has a few successes but he's also just a big embarassment. Israel owns him.


I could easily find 10 and they're all quite blatant. Even one of them is more than what we saw on Biden. I got up to 7 .. and ran out of steam but many things I've listed were many occurances put into one sentence.

Truly sad.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I remember really calling out the arm story was it was clearly in the 'did not happen' category of stories. Then your credibility took a huge swing down.

---

True, AccountInQuestion was among the first to dispute it in its entirety:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

sniff sniff what is that I smell.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

What's incredible too is that UNKewlJ keeps trying to claim that he "lied only about that" and that the "rest" of the backrooming story is true, while at the same time he remains

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

hopelessly dense

---

and deliberately obtuse about the

UNKEWL OUTED FOR YET ANOTHER LIE ABOUT THE MDAWG ABOUT EVEN POST


refusing to acknowledge against all evidence including the Wizard's statement himself that MDawg posted the "about even" statement only as an accommodation to get his Adventures of MDawg thread unhidden, and that this was done before UNKewlJ ever posted the completely debunked and constantly shifting lie about having player records.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

"I have seen his actually gambling records on several occasions"

And you can show proof of this?

Let me guess? NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Or let me guess, you can show proof, but won't?

---

This retard is a closeted homosexual.