Vegas Formula One

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Living and playing Vegas, I am all for Las Vegas doing well. Even some events that might inconvenience locals.

But I don't think we are getting an honest representation of what F1 brings or is worth to Las Vegas. There will be reports in the media that F1 was worth xxxxx dollars. But is it really? I mean the money from the race and those high priced tickets (usually comped out) go to F1, not Las Vegas.

I don't want just a number of visitors in town and hotel room/restaurant and gambling revenue for the weekend. I want to see what above a normal November weekend just before thanksgiving is. I suspect it probably is above because they can charge more for rooms with such an event. But it is NOT the numbers we will see comparing to zero. You have to compare to what a normal weekend would be.

And then secondly you have to subtract additional costs. And unlike things like a big fight or big show, there are way more costs. F1 results in a lot of costs and construction. Last year there were many small businesses, restaurants, stores, not on the strip, but places like Koval (back end of the track) that had the entrances to their businesses blocked for several days. So for those small local businesses it is a loss that isn't included in the totals that will be published. It is worse than just a loss. It is a transfer of revenue from those small local businesses, to F1.

If you really added everything honestly and subtract all the additional costs that other events don't have, I don't think F1 really is what it is cracked up to be for Las Vegas.

---

You saw and know nothing. What a phony. Everything you said was on the local news yesterday.

Good try grandpa.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Except that we already know where the homeless bum dwells. Dwells not lives.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

If nothing else, this exercise proves that SeedValue did indeed investigate UNKewlJ. That IP address he gave me is indeed UNKewlJ's, it's not just a coincidence that it is from Cox, the ISP UNKewl claims she uses, and geolocates to that shady area of Vegas. UNKewlJ doesn't even deny that it is his IP, just tries to claim that it doesn't mean what it does.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Besides making perfect sense, seedvalue's investigation established that UnKewlJ is a male prostitute, and MaxPen and others' sightings of UNKewlJ in the presence of a sugar daddy type affirmed it.

Plus, perhaps the greatest affirmation of all, soon after the truth with all its back up broke UNKewlJ disavowed the existence of his deceased soul male sugar daddy. When have we known UNKewlJ to disavow (such as when he claimed he was not even gay, admitted that he lied about the lawsuit, changed around his OSN database story, altered details of the $50. freeplay $100K hit, changed his college dropout story, etc.) other than when the heat is on and the hounds have him by the tail.

---

---

---

This retard is a closeted homosexual.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Except that we already know where the homeless bum dwells. Dwells not lives.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

If nothing else, this exercise proves that SeedValue did indeed investigate UNKewlJ. That IP address he gave me is indeed UNKewlJ's, it's not just a coincidence that it is from Cox, the ISP UNKewl claims she uses, and geolocates to that shady area of Vegas. UNKewlJ doesn't even deny that it is his IP, just tries to claim that it doesn't mean what it does.

---

---

---

We all know Singer has nothing better to do but wait around to either leech off someone or croak....but this sand nigger apparently is in Vegas, getting comped up the ass,dropping more of his Sheikh daddy`s money, living the life of Riley and has posted about KewlJ already at least 10 times....quite the pathetic bullshitter

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Keystone

.but this sand nigger apparently is in Vegas, getting comped up the ass, dropping more of his Sheikh daddy`s money, living the life of Riley and has posted about KewlJ already at least 10 times....quite the pathetic bullshitter

---

This is true, but Dawg is not dropping as much of his daddy's money as he pretends and wants people to believe. He does gamble and lose, but just not as large as he claims. He is "associated with" for lack of a better term with some other players (family or other association) that does bet very big and Dawg benefits from that association and gets and uses bigger and more comps than his play earns him

Credit to Axelwolf who figured this out very early on. Dan Druff also came to this conclusion fairly early, saying something like dawg bets big, but not as big as he wants people to believe.

And I know it for a fact having on two occasions seen his actual records of play. Take the 7 month period for example when Dawg claimed to have won millions, while living in comped suites for 7 straight months, that Wizard forced dawg to come clean on. Dawgs actual records for that period showed just about a 100k loss.

100k loss is not enough to get a player comped suite and meals for 7 months. So he was using comped earned by someone else, playing (and probably losing) much bigger. Maybe Daddy. Maybe some other relative. Maybe some other person he is associated with, like someone that he sells watches to. :rolleyes: (axel's theory)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

So typical. You're such a drama queen. Of course I'm not going to apologize to the biggest phoney fuck on these forums. Just like you're not going to apologize for all the bullshit you've spun

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soxfan

Wow, the kewl-groomer still squealing like a little bitch, amazing, hey hey!!!!

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Keystone

.but this sand nigger apparently is in Vegas, getting comped up the ass, dropping more of his Sheikh daddy`s money, living the life of Riley and has posted about KewlJ already at least 10 times....quite the pathetic bullshitter

---

This is true, but Dawg is not dropping as much of his daddy's money as he pretends and wants people to believe. He does gamble and lose, but just not as large as he claims. He is "associated with" for lack of a better term with some other players (family or other association) that does bet very big and Dawg benefits from that association and gets and uses bigger and more comps than his play earns him

Credit to Axelwolf who figured this out very early on. Dan Druff also came to this conclusion fairly early, saying something like dawg bets big, but not as big as he wants people to believe.

And I know it for a fact having on two occasions seen his actual records of play. Take the 7 month period for example when Dawg claimed to have won millions, while living in comped suites for 7 straight months, that Wizard forced dawg to come clean on. Dawgs actual records for that period showed just about a 100k loss.

100k loss is not enough to get a player comped suite and meals for 7 months. So he was using comped earned by someone else, playing (and probably losing) much bigger. Maybe Daddy. Maybe some other relative. Maybe some other person he is associated with, like someone that he sells watches to. :rolleyes: (axel's theory)

---

But can you PROVE it? You just don't want to believe because you are a hater!

Right?

Right?

Is that not how it goes?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

But can you PROVE it? You just don't want to believe because you are a hater!

Right?

Right?

Is that not how it goes?

---

I CAN, but that would involve exposing his real name (doxing him) and would place others people (friends) in Jeopardy.

And I don't even need to do that. EVERYONE including YOU AcctinQ, already knows. You may like to pretend, but you can't be so dumb as to not know the truth. (at least I hope)


When I set out to prove something, like proving something with this Dawgs actual records, or proving that the Shuffle machines can easily be fixed (including by casino personnel), I don't set out to prove it so I can post proof or get involved with some kind of legal action (shuffle machines). I set out to prove it to myself!! To prove what I already know! So that when I say something, make some accusation, it isn't a blind accusation, guess or gut feeling. But That I have already proven to myself what I am saying.

The only time I actually failed at this was just after casino re-opened from Covid. I went on a losing streak at a particular casino south of the strip and jumped the gun and accused them of cheating, when a larger sample size proved they were not. So I like to prove these things to myself. I then may share the conclusion of what I know for sure and have proven to myself. But I will never share the actual proof and especially if it places someone else in jeopardy. THAT is not my job. Do your own homework.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

But can you PROVE it? You just don't want to believe because you are a hater!

Right?

Right?

Is that not how it goes?

---

I CAN, but that would involve exposing his real name (doxing him) and would place others people (friends) in Jeopardy.

And I don't even need to do that. EVERYONE including YOU AcctinQ, already knows. You may like to pretend, but you can't be so dumb as to not know the truth. (at least I hope)


When I set out to prove something, like proving something with this Dawgs actual records, or proving that the Shuffle machines can easily be fixed (including by casino personnel), I don't set out to prove it so I can post proof or get involved with some kind of legal action (shuffle machines). I set out to prove it to myself!! To prove what I already know! So that when I say something, make some accusation, it isn't a blind accusation, guess or gut feeling. But That I have already proven to myself what I am saying.

The only time I actually failed at this was just after casino re-opened from Covid. I went on a losing streak at a particular casino south of the strip and jumped the gun and accused them of cheating, when a larger sample size proved they were not. So I like to prove these things to myself. I then may share the conclusion of what I know for sure and have proven to myself. But I will never share the actual proof and especially if it places someone else in jeopardy. THAT is not my job. Do your own homework.

---

I can prove at least 18 of your stories are pure lies but I don't want these psychos on here knowing who you are. You always say no one can prove but I *CAN* prove it. I know who you are. I have the proofs. I just don't want to dox it so I let you continue with your lies.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I don't want these psychos on here knowing who you are. You always say no one can prove but I *CAN* prove it. I know who you are. I have the proofs. I just don't want to dox it so I let you continue with your lies.

---

You "know" who KJ is, do you?

You even have the "proofs" of your claim, eh?

Well played, Sherlock.



Why not ask KJ for permission to post your "findings?"

BTW, how'd you "learn" this information?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I can prove at least 18 of your stories are pure lies but I don't want these psychos on here knowing who you are. You always say no one can prove but I *CAN* prove it. I know who you are. I have the proofs. I just don't want to dox it so I let you continue with your lies.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

The difference is that when someone like accountinquestion says he has the goods on someone there is no reason to doubt him. When a proven and outed pathological liar UNKewlJ presents his usual conflicting nonsense about knowing this or that about someone it may be discounted entirely.

Put another way, anyone so desperate to be believed would by now have spilled whatever proof of his own clearly fictional story he had. The reason he never provides any proof of anything is because he has none to offer.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I've gone over this many times. You ADDED needless details to your story. Adding fiction later in the story doesn't make you more difficult to find. It just pads the story with bullshit.

I would have no problem if you "lied" by changing around dates, times, or even the name of the casino. But the bullshit added in the second half of the story was at best padding for attention, and at worst the entire thing was false. We will never know.

I've stated before that I don't know if you really are a blackjack AP or not. Maybe you are, maybe you aren't, and maybe you are but some of your stories are exaggerated. Again, we will likely never know.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Why not ask KJ for permission to post your "findings?"

BTW, how'd you "learn" this information?

---

I am 100% sure based on AinQ comments and 18 lies and all that complete bullshit, that he doesn't know much, if anything about me, because there isn't 18 lies. there are about 2 which I have admitted to and explained why.

BUT there are a couple people in the gambling community, not associated with this forum that do know some about me, and it would not be impossible for AinQ or anyone else to come across some information in the future, so NO I do not give blanket permission for someone to dox me.

MrV, Mdawg communicates privately with people like AcctinQ, seedvalue, Rob Singer. Sort of a network of trolls and KJ Haters strategizing their every move. That is partly why they repeat each other. Seedvalue passed a loit of completely made up bullshit, that Dawg passes to the rest of the haters. None of it true and no matter how much they repeat and add to it in their little network, it all remains about as true as Singer's Newell, and Dawgs great adventure.

Fair enough, KJ.

But it might be good for shits and giggles for AIQ to weigh in on exactly HOW he LEARNED who you REALLY are.

I'll wait...tick ...tick ... tick ...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Fair enough, KJ.

But it might be good for shits and giggles for AIQ to weigh in on exactly HOW he LEARNED who you REALLY are.

I'll wait...tick ...tick ... tick ...

---

Well ask him then.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soxfan

Wow, the kewl-groomer still squealing like a little bitch, amazing, hey hey!!!!

---

There is only ONE person on this forum that squeals like a little bitch. It is the Sand Nigger that started a thread for no other reason than to squeal like a bitch about people calling him names and continues to squeal about it on a daily basis.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

At some point you will realize you're dealing with a compulsive liar.

---

How long are you going to go on with this 3rd grade bullying/stalking shit dawg?

Since you can't seem to figure it out, let me explain to you what the problem is. Nobody really cares whether you win or lose. Even me. I don't like your lying about all the winning, but it in no way effects me.

The real problem is everything and I mean EVERYTHING you post on EVERY forum, has a narcistic braggard element to it. Dan Druff even called you an obnoxious braggard in a statement that I used as my signature for a long time.

Everything is about you trying to convince everyone else that you are better than everyone. All the gambling tales, all the comps (which in reality you or someone else has paid for with casino losses). You show pictures of high end food. Often half eaten Food. One time you talked about how you were using expensive charcoal toothpaste, but you couldn't just say that, you posted pictures of the toothpaste that you had spit out into the sink for God Sakes.

And lets not even get into the watches and shit. Every SINGLE thing you post is an attempt to impress people. And the big news flash is that: The harder you try to impress people, the bigger asshole everyone thinks you are. No one is impressed. They just aren't. And it has nothing to do with jealousy, so don't even go there. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I don't want these psychos on here knowing who you are. You always say no one can prove but I *CAN* prove it. I know who you are. I have the proofs. I just don't want to dox it so I let you continue with your lies.

---

You "know" who KJ is, do you?

You even have the "proofs" of your claim, eh?

Well played, Sherlock.



Why not ask KJ for permission to post your "findings?"

BTW, how'd you "learn" this information?

---

Why not ask KJ? huh? I'm not going to do it regardless of what he says. I don't want the fallout on my plate. I am not here to prove anything.

Those who have worked with me know I am legitimate recreational AP.

It is not my job to go around proving things to people nor am I going to dox anyone.

If I had a need to prove the things i've learned AND if there wasn't a very very large potential to damage Kewl then sure i'd post what I have uncovered.

The truth is I have proof that he has lied 18 times. Hmmm. Maybe only 16 lies. The proof is questionable on 2 of them so maybe I shouldn't make a claim of 18. Whatever - either way I have stone cold proof that on 16 lies of the 40-odd list that Mdawg has.