Quote:
Originally Posted by
MisterV
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bill Yung
And my own neat little theory of everything. I play with theories and facts. Certainly not spaceships to Jupiter.
Ah, those theories.
You posted your "deep thoughts" for awhile at Penalty Box but stopped now that you've posted regularly on this forum.
I never could quite get the gist of just what the fuck you were getting at, especially with that periodic table discussion.
Anyway, it seems you've found a home here; people may not want you posting here but as with Singer you can only be banned by Dan, and he's pretty tolerant.
So what's this again about the periodic table?
Gambling math just means math that it is no longer really math. Life reduced to a bunch of meaningless numbers. Half a percent here, a quarter of a percent there. No wonder the ancient Greek mathematicians, who laid the foundations of modern math, had zero interest in it. And totally forgot to mention it. For sure, there are no lessons in math at any blackjack table. People sit there alone together, and scratch their asses, and hope for a better life. Mass "gaming".
As with the gambling and its forums, I sought a similar but simultaneous form of the game-of-poker's optimal strategy of "cooperation but not" among its players (in fun) while I define and formulate my own theory of everything. Whereby, I, too, sought to render the numbers useless, but for more inventive avenues of paradox akin to and conducive of such a theory. How does a theory of everything already reside in the everything? Another paradox, to say the least.
MrV, sorry that your own understanding of anything scientifically bookish is so severely limited. Not my problem. But science and math fit in with any gambling forum, as I outlined above, if only to reassure everyone that there is no proper way to gamble for any amount of money. You may, and undoubtedly will, hem, heave and haw, but it changes nothing. Family law must be the armpit of any law.
Find me a mathematician who gambles, or who in any way endorses the Wizard and any of his forums, and I will take off my hip waders, and doff my hat to you. (Excluding Jacobson, of course, who sells gambling stuff, or did, until, one day at the Wizard's, he wrote that he must have lost his mind for doing it.)
No problem with the other site. I continue to develop my theory wrt the periodic table, and in general as well. Putting things together theoretically always lags a bit with the new discoveries.
I'm in a good spot with it. Matched up a couple of key sums of consecutive primes within the part of table that overlaps our dimensions. Two for two, actually, and without effort. The numbers either jibe or not. I have nothing to prove in any hurried manner. Will relate the numbers and dimensions directly to the physical quantities in good time. The key is to see such a relation or correspondence between all of those. But, I don't want to give that away, just yet.
The periodic table, itself, how it is formed, is still one of the great unknowns of science. Well beyond problems like the Riemann Hypothesis, for which the experts still expect to see some sort of solution within the next hundred years. Likely, we may never even be able to construct more than a handful more of the elements of the table, beyond the 118th. Which spells out bad news for a system of theory based solely on observable results.