Printable View
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/las-...l-bigger-tips/
the wife and kids must love this.
yet people are nuked for far less. He wants a high class board. Someone found calling someone sarcastically "a real genius" to be a insult..and a suspension ensued. Do women in general like this type of post?
Wizard's Blog - Page 8 - blogs - Wizard of Vegas
May 2, 2011 ... I just came from there and this is the story of my visit. The primary reason for my trip to Panama was banking in nature, but the secondary purpose was to investigate and report on the gambling scene in Panama City. I will go over that, and other non-gambling activities in two future blog entries coming soon.
https://wizardofvegas.com/member/wizard/blog/8/>>>>from wov search
this is on the search thread when i plug in panama city......I remember reading this and the "banking" reason for being there///but it seems to be deleted, unless there is a way yo pull up old stuff.
This is perfectly consistent with a libertarian morality. Stealing involves a nonconsenting party, prostitution is a consensual business transaction, therefore if your morality is based around the concept of consent, one is AOK the other is not.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
Ok monet..I gave it a go....I believe its been removed. He did get alot of heat for it at GF at the time so he probably tossed it or one of his bosses did.
It was a lengthy report. In the above he says it took up 2 future blogs. Its was very detailed, and after all in a "banking trip" in panama, why not hang out with and give money to a prostitute(even though he didnt admit to sex with her).
No problem LarryS!
Pepe... You are out of your flipping mind if you think prostitution or prostitutes are a victimless crime. I don't even have to research the subject very much to prove you wrong. It is a known fact that many hookers are abused from family members at a very young age or are controlled by someone like a pimp. It is also known that the sex slave trade runs rampant turning little girls into paid whores or just sex slaves period for wealthy aristocrats. You have no just grounds for your two or three rebuttals or obvious pro stance for prostitution. It is clear you are in favor of hookers. I don't really care. The world is completely messed up with mostly evil doers, myself included. My stance or fight is with this Wizard claiming moral and ethical and honesty but you don't have to dig very deep to find out that he is lying and two faced being a complete hypocrite from how he teaches or preaches. That's fine... I don't hate the guy I just want to show how full of it he really is.
Next Pepe you have plenty of hookers running scams on Johns or outright strong arming them so stop this nonsense about a victimless crime. You can't even try to win that debate without being laughed off the stage. Even this consent theory of yours is way off base. You really are on the wrong side of this stance if it is even possible. Your one of the few people I know sticking up for the immoral trade of flesh. I say immoral because most of you claim this high and mighty morality in yourselves.
Victimless crime? Consensual business transaction? Try to tell the IRS that nonsense. Oh right all you honest Abe's think hookers are claiming money earned or the johns are claiming business expenses for pleasure. Honestly Pepe, if your going to debate me, at least take an easier stance that you can win or just get in the mud like others and tell me how I'm sucking this or that or polishing myself. Just call me a POS like others instead of this Ridiculous Stance your taking.
The point is when people can't win debates... they resort to name calling. Drawing Dead crushed Gordonm888 on the SaP/WoN thread using Gordon's words against him. Gordonm888 couldn't reply or defend his position. He didn't even admit he completely contradicted himself so he resorted to humor kissing and loving him instead. He obviously lost and resigned the debate.
Dinosaurs are big, but it ends there. Photons are small but can smear themselves over much larger areas, pass through each other, and convey information from one to the other across vast distances almost instantaneously. Imagine an analogous colony of sentient beings. AI may be more a matter of our evolution sorting itself out across a big drawing board, and compacting and miniaturizing the findings, then of our ever finer technologies such as computer chips. Anyway, if sentient life survives and thrives, there will be much more to it than technology. After all, we would have another few billion years, so it has to be something "big".Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
There are sexuality transmitted diseases. Ever hear of hiv? Herpes? Vernarial warts? Hpv...all viruses that can stay dormant for years...especially in women. They can be transmitted to new borns. Not every prostitute is Julia Roberts in PrettyWoman. Thousands of people have died in the USA from hiv from prostitutes .many marriages were ruined as wives became infected. And children suffer, some die from STDS transmitted from prostitute to dad to mom to newborn
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryS
LarryS, inquiring minds need to know. If the whole prostitution thing is bad news, you didn't vote for a certain Prez who cavorts unprotected with porn stars, did you? Nawwww, no chance, right?
I didn't vote. It's a young man future. It's unfair for me to vote on someone or something that will have repercussions decades from now.
As a senior, there are things that may effect me now..
The biggest thing is obamacare..
But the horse is already out of the barn and usa Healthcare
e is fkd going forward
Let us look at a response by Mission that was directed to me... He says that no friendships that are lost "don't count." This is obviously wrong. In life or even in the government or the armies of the world they have people that they classify as expendable. Make no doubt that we all have friendships in life that are expendable. Now, one could argue that it is subjective and that Mission does not believe in people or friendships being expendable but I think if anyone looks at situations objectively they can clearly see where one person is more expendable than another in their life. Most people will agree that things happen and you have to keep moving forward if you want to overcome.
Exactly. Why, our leader would probably add, "Show me a friendship that ISN'T expendable." Whether it's Steve Bannon or the wayward son-in-law or the first couple of wives or Stormy or the Playboy bunny or Merv, every friendship turns out to be eminently expendable. That's the way of the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
All I know is, EvenBooB (yes, I intentionally spelled it that way) just called Melania a prostitute. That got me to giggle.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
"Hook and Crook"
What a couple.
Here is another interesting AP story or just a story how I am different compared to others. It also shows how broke people really are in the world. However, they can own large SUVs or trucks, tvs, cell phone, computers and whatever else they need or want.
So I'm sitting here watching a nature show about squirrels. We hear a bang outside. My uncle says what was that? I say most likely a truck door or truck making a delivery of some kind. A minute or so later my door bell is ringing like crazy. I don't like that. So it looks safe... just some guy in a huge blue Dodge Ram. He gets me outside saying he hit my wife's car on the bumper. Doesn't look too bad a good scratch. She's had this problem before in parking lots. Since this bumper can't be fixed with the usual body work because they say they can't match the paint it costs about 700. That might be high or low... who knows if he caused other problems. He says he has insurance and I can take his information. I tell him let's just settle for cash. He says 500... I say 600 and we're good. He says he doesn't have the money. I say when you have the money just ring my doorbell and give it to me. He says let's trade names and information. I say what's the point. We agree on a cash deal. I'm not calling the cops or insurance. I don't care if you pay me or not... I'll fix it myself. This is too minor of a deal to bother me. He says I'm your neighbor living over there. I say... whatever... when you got the money just pay. I don't care either way.
Maybe now you see a little bit of how I am. I don't really care about money and I'm not calling the cops or insurance of most any matters in my life.
The point is people don't even have 600 cash to their name. I had over 10k talking to this neighbor on my person... that's just me.
What exactly do you mean by that?Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
Are you saying it doesn't matter whether you have it or not, as you can always steal and thieve to get by?
Or is it that you are set financially now and don't have to worry about it?
Or maybe you're just a hippy at heart yearning to live in a yurt and play his kazoo?
We ALL care abut money, sport: don't kid yourself.
Bill, photons don't age because they are not alive (which I define as having one or more cells each with a mitochondria and capable of reproduction).Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Yung
Indeed. Sharks are amazingly powerful creatures. Now imagine its extinct (or commonly believed to be so by mainstream science) ancestor, the megalodon, which was orders of magnitude more powerful than a shark.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
You sir are on thick headed son of a gun. I expect that from someone who takes sides of two parties to get the best award for their client. I expect this from an individual who thinks they are doing humanity good by providing people to get out of blood covenant agreements. I expect it from someone who profits on other peoples misery.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVWhat exactly do you mean by that?Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
Are you saying it doesn't matter whether you have it or not, as you can always steal and thieve to get by?
Or is it that you are set financially now and don't have to worry about it?
Or maybe you're just a hippy at heart yearning to live in a yurt and play his kazoo?
We ALL care abut money, sport: don't kid yourself.
Now as I have stated many times in life or to you or on forums I am a complete contradiction. That is my actions in life contradict my beliefs or knowledge. As I have stated before I am in complete bondage to sin, pleasure, worldliness, the easy life, stealing, lying and many other improper actions. I really don't care about money. I tried to get my family involved in farming instead of the world system but nothing doing. We are too addicted to tv and the easy life. I throw money away like water. Yesterday I had panhandlers asking for money so I started throwing 20s all over the sidewalk. The truth is I am scum but don't worry soon enough I'll be dead.
You're not scum, Monet.
You're just a guy getting some daily positive reinforcement (attention) where he can find it.
You're like alan in that way.
Right. So here's a story (non-fictional) about just such a "broke" person. I am waiting in line to buy some groceries at the store. A clerk in a different aisle quietly says "I'll take the next person in line over here". So I exit the line I am in and go to the newly-opened aisle. I place my items on the conveyor belt. The person who was in front of me in the previous aisle I was in decides to go to this new shorter line. The person cuts in front me as if I am not there, shoves my items back and places their items on the conveyor belt in front of mine and pays for the groceries (lobster tails, steaks and the like) with an EBT card (that is how I know the person is "broke"). After I purchased my items I am waiting on a bench outside the entrance to the store because the bathroom at the store is in use and I need to use it. I hear a small boutique toy dog (I'm thinking in the $800-$1000 range) barking its head off out the window of a fancy black Escalade in the parking lot. I see the person who was in front of me in line (that shoved my grocery items aside), get in the $60000 Escalade, comfort the dog, and drive off.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
You were chumped by that bitch.
I remember one time, it was right before xmas, I was at the local grocery store trying to check out.
I got in the express line, which had a sign that said it was for no more than "X" number of items.
The guy in front of me had a full cart, and started to unload it.
I barked at him that it was an express only line, he was in the wrong line, and told him that he needed to get in the right line.
He looked at me as in "How dare you!" then started mouthing off.
To make a long story short I stood my ground, yelled back just as forcefully then glared: he removed his items and went to the right line, cowed.
You can't take shit from people, they'll run over you if you don't stand up to them.
By age I mean experience time, or duration, as an endurance of some condition or state. But, it depends how narrow your definition of life. I would conclude just that existence is life, and be done with it. Eg, radioactive decay of atomic nuclei goes by the term half-lifes, or the time it takes for those to disappear or die out. I could argue to what is really alive, and claim that nothing is. A lot of this is like arguing about subatomic particles not (in known cases) being able to experience heat because they are beneath the vibrations of atoms; and the reason an initial patient of some outbreak is called patient zero, as to the non-mathematical among us it may not have meaning to be the zeroth of a series of events or outcomes.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayBill, photons don't age because they are not alive (which I define as having one or more cells each with a mitochondria and capable of reproduction).Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Yung
Here is an online article about how long it takes a photon to die, according to exotic theories, and, perhaps, some of the currently accepted theories of the big bang. I'm going to assume that you don't require me to fill in the rest. And, especially since you seem to imply or jest that I am confusing photons with mitochondria. Singular: mitochondrion.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/...n_3677220.html
you have to be careful..sometimes an empty express line person invites someone with a oversize order over the max limit.
I would guess you saw the entrance to the line from the beginning so you could rule out the "invitation".
I have been caught getting the ire of people just from that situation
By age I mean experience time, or duration, as an endurance of some condition or state. But, it depends how narrow your definition of life. I would conclude just that existence is life, and be done with it. Eg, radioactive decay of atomic nuclei goes by the term half-lifes, or the time it takes for those to disappear or die out. I could argue to what is really alive, and claim that nothing is. A lot of this is like arguing about subatomic particles not (in known cases) being able to experience heat because they are beneath the vibrations of atoms; and the reason an initial patient of some outbreak is called patient zero, as to the non-mathematical among us it may not have meaning to be the zeroth of a series of physical events or outcomes.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayBill, photons don't age because they are not alive (which I define as having one or more cells each with a mitochondria and capable of reproduction).Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Yung
Here is an online article about how long it takes a photon to die, according to exotic theories, and, perhaps, some of the currently accepted theories of the big bang. I'm going to assume that you don't require me to fill in the rest. And, especially since you seem to imply or jest that I am confusing photons with mitochondria. Singular: mitochondrion. Come to think of it, even a fine wine ages well.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/...n_3677220.html
Another way to put it is getting penalized for being alert. Or the other person's inattention is now your problem (you become a noticeable entity only when their greed is threatened).Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryS
Do you guys really read bill yung's posts? I don't waste my time anymore.
If I'm reading this correctly, you were in the wrong here. If they were in front of you, they were the next person in line, and you cut them off.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Not really, no. Only times I do is when I accidentally start reading it then after the fact realize it was him. =\Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
That wasn't the point to the story. It makes no difference who cut who off in line. You guys are funny. It's like my own posts or stances. Many times your not understanding what is being said or the stances that are being made. People see my posts and think I don't like the person or I have hard feelings toward them. These points that are being made aren't emotional.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guy IncognitoIf I'm reading this correctly, you were in the wrong here. If they were in front of you, they were the next person in line, and you cut them off.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Yes, I do indeed read his posts.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
They often "make me think," which I realize some people might find to be an unpleasant sensation.
There is only so much time for me to think. I prefer spending it on things that are relevant. I'm not into the space time continuum which I don't really know what the hell is anyway. But I can do the math on a gambling game.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVYes, I do indeed read his posts.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
They often "make me think," which I realize some people might find to be an unpleasant sensation.
The person did not respond when the clerk said they would take the next person. They responded when I moved to the next line. Furthermore I did not state anywhere in my post that I was in the right. I made a poor attempt at trying to make the point that "broke" people can afford Escalades, expensive toy dogs, along with gourmet food.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guy IncognitoIf I'm reading this correctly, you were in the wrong here. If they were in front of you, they were the next person in line, and you cut them off.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
I will follow suit Mickey. So long OHW/Bill Yung.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
No your point was crystal clear. You quoted my quote that stated people are broke. You told your story and stated about the EBT and that's how you knew they were broke. Your story had nothing to do with who was in line first or not. Sometimes I think people have trouble comprehending when reading and they just skim. They really don't have a stance or belief or care about the conversation. Sometimes things get lost in translation on the net but this isn't the case this instance.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayThe person did not respond when the clerk said they would take the next person. They responded when I moved to the next line. Furthermore I did not state anywhere in my post that I was in the right. I made a poor attempt at trying to make the point that "broke" people can afford Escalades, expensive toy dogs, along with gourmet food.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guy IncognitoIf I'm reading this correctly, you were in the wrong here. If they were in front of you, they were the next person in line, and you cut them off.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Just like my point wasn't about car insurance or cops it was that people don't have access to 600 dollars cash for the most part because they are too far into debt living outside of their means.
Like yourself, MrV is very perceptive - nowhere did I state the gender of the person in front of me, but MrV correctly identified the gender of this person despite my omission.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetNo your point was crystal clear. You quoted my quote that stated people are broke. You told your story and stated about the EBT and that's how you knew they were broke. Your story had nothing to do with who was in line first or not. Sometimes I think people have trouble comprehending when reading and they just skim. They really don't have a stance or belief or care about the conversation. Sometimes things get lost in translation on the net but this isn't the case this instance.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayThe person did not respond when the clerk said they would take the next person. They responded when I moved to the next line. Furthermore I did not state anywhere in my post that I was in the right. I made a poor attempt at trying to make the point that "broke" people can afford Escalades, expensive toy dogs, along with gourmet food.Quote:
Originally Posted by Guy Incognito
Just like my point wasn't about car insurance or cops it was that people don't have access to 600 dollars cash for the most part because they are too far into debt living outside of their means.
That was probably no omission: you took pains, for whatever reason, not to refer to the interloper's sex.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
I concluded however that the person was either a woman or a gay man, as they had "a small boutique toy dog."
Manly men don't have small boutique toy dogs, they have pit bulls, bull mastiffs and bull dogs.
As you included no snide gay innuendos I made the correct call, i.e. a woman.
*sips coffee, pats self on back*
I know this board is un-moderated or lightly moderated, but THIS is a pretty nasty attack. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
you left out the part where you walked up to the woman as she entered her car, and asked to look in her glove compartment. You rummaged through it, and found her registration. You then asked to see her drivers license and the name on the registration matched the name on the DL. THAT was the most important part of the story, not the fact that she rightfully moved to her place in line.
Haha. I'm more into the "daily negative reinforcement (attention)" of watching a bunch of gamblers piss their lives away.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Let's call a spade a spade, yung: no matter how we view ourselves, no matter what we do while spending our alloted time on terra firma we are ALL pissing our lives away.
There's no alternative.
This is, of course, true in general. An optimally or seamlessly designed universe has only itself (in inverse, to perpetuate itself). Wouldn't a specific theory(s) of this then be an alternative to the general case? The no-alternative alternative.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
I'll ponder that, as well as the notion of the zipless fuck.
Larry, I'm sure, after having observed no movement from the person in front of you when the clerk in the newly-opened aisle said they would take the next person in line, that you would not have changed to the new aisle. I did not enter a race to beat the other person to the new aisle. The person belatedly observed me getting into the new line and then went to the new line. Had the person gone to the new aisle during the initial call out, I would have just followed behind them to the new aisle. Also a loud, manically barking dog, drew my attention to the Escalade. Perhaps ignoring loud, boisterous events or things happening right next to me in line would mitigate your perception that I am a busy body.Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryS
In your future anecdotes, I'll be pointing out the parts you left out.
I know this isn't the point of the story, but if a new line opens and you are the first person in that line... Then you are first. The position you were in on a previous line doesn't matter.
It does to Larry.Quote:
Originally Posted by Prozema
Nope.Quote:
Originally Posted by Prozema
means the person directly behind the person currently checking out is next.Quote:
A clerk in a different aisle quietly says "I'll take the next person in line over here".
When a cashier asks for the next person in line I don't assume that the person in front of me heard so I always ask first.
Secondly it wasn't established if she owned the suv or even owned the card or even if the food she bought was for her.
It was nice of the owner of the EBT card to provide the person using the card the PIN number for the card - very trusting. I really enjoy lobster tails - hopefully I will get poor enough to qualify for an EBT card so I can buy them (or have someone else buy them and provide them with my PIN).Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryS
In the time it took the person to remove their items from the original aisle, walk over to the new aisle, shove my items further back on the conveyor belt, and then get served, they would have been maybe a minute and a half out from being served in the original line;this is why I didn't say anything to the person in front of me - I figured it wouldn't be worth the effort for the person to remove their stuff when they were pretty close to being serviced. Most importantly, I made no complaint whatsoever when the person, maybe a half a minute later to a minute later, came to the aisle I migrated to and went first (the clerk in the newly-opened isle seemed somewhat surprised).Quote:
Originally Posted by Guy IncognitoNope.Quote:
Originally Posted by Prozema
means the person directly behind the person currently checking out is next.Quote:
A clerk in a different aisle quietly says "I'll take the next person in line over here".
See my response hereQuote:
Originally Posted by monet
Quote:
Originally Posted by monetI think LarryS misunderstood Cwazy... Cwazy is saying WoN has a lawsuit against WoV if I'm reading those posts correctly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Prozema
I have been directly questioned if I was waxie22... I am not.
I am surprised nobody has asked me if I'm Cwazy... seems reasonable but I'm not.
Prozema, it is no big secret that The Wizard and others in that WoN/SaP thread have deleted whole posts and serious questions and information on no proof or grounds. The Wizard has changed his rules because of waxie22 to ban or delete information from beyond a reasonable doubt to now stated only needing a reasonable doubt. The next rule change will be his resignation or should be but he has too much ego and pride of that site.
Interesting that he has pride in allowing crews of Gamblers and con men to run wild on his site. I and KewlJ have admitted AxelWolf contacts us through PMs to edit or delete information on posted materials. Try to wake up and realize this whole thing is a con job. First get the suckers interested and tell them the math behind the games. Put bait on the website to sign up for online Casinos. Next allow your Mods and members to take part in illegal pick ups for free play behind the scenes. Next allow WoN on your site for years until Monet causes his banning and later WoN is found out to be a con man and members hold onto that information for at least 8 months. Not hard to connect these dots.
Do you ever see the pictures of this Wizard with all the Bovada Models. My wife would ring my neck if I posed with a bunch of ladies like that!?
The play Ran deep. From pin cracking to fake ids and outright cons of new Aps. Often these losers would show up in casinos I had been working for years back when this idiot was bumming cigs at trop. I would watch them lose everything they made back to the casinos over and over. No wonder after a paltry few million dollar win online some of these guys announced their retirement. Like a few million can sustain a mid 40 year old gambling addict the rest of their lives. A few million is hardly enough to retire on so young for the average person. That trader on twitter who post 10101010 times a day about Elon is another fraud. These guys get a few hundred thousand or crack 7 figures and think they are doing something. All of them are fraudulent cons. Very few guys with high integrity in this business. I never recruit or work with known gamblers. AP is just short for con artist for most.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueQuote:
Originally Posted by monetI think LarryS misunderstood Cwazy... Cwazy is saying WoN has a lawsuit against WoV if I'm reading those posts correctly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Prozema
I have been directly questioned if I was waxie22... I am not.
I am surprised nobody has asked me if I'm Cwazy... seems reasonable but I'm not.
Prozema, it is no big secret that The Wizard and others in that WoN/SaP thread have deleted whole posts and serious questions and information on no proof or grounds. The Wizard has changed his rules because of waxie22 to ban or delete information from beyond a reasonable doubt to now stated only needing a reasonable doubt. The next rule change will be his resignation or should be but he has too much ego and pride of that site.
Interesting that he has pride in allowing crews of Gamblers and con men to run wild on his site. I and KewlJ have admitted AxelWolf contacts us through PMs to edit or delete information on posted materials. Try to wake up and realize this whole thing is a con job. First get the suckers interested and tell them the math behind the games. Put bait on the website to sign up for online Casinos. Next allow your Mods and members to take part in illegal pick ups for free play behind the scenes. Next allow WoN on your site for years until Monet causes his banning and later WoN is found out to be a con man and members hold onto that information for at least 8 months. Not hard to connect these dots.
Do you ever see the pictures of this Wizard with all the Bovada Models. My wife would ring my neck if I posed with a bunch of ladies like that!?
The play Ran deep. From pin cracking to fake ids and outright cons of new Aps. Often these losers would show up in casinos I had been working for years back when this idiot was bumming cigs at trop. I would watch them lose everything they made back to the casinos over and over. No wonder after a paltry few million dollar win online some of these guys announced their retirement. Like a few million can sustain a mid 40 year old gambling addict the rest of their lives. A few million is hardly enough to retire on so young for the average person. That trader on twitter who post 10101010 times a day about Elon is another fraud. These guys get a few hundred thousand or crack 7 figures and think they are doing something. All of them are fraudulent cons. Very few guys with high integrity in this business. I never recruit or work with known gamblers. AP is just short for con artist for most.
O and the gangs all here on VCT. They protect each other.