Question for Slapinfunk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Axel: Do you believe I hit three $2 royals and four aces w/kicker on a single line $2 machine at South Point in one hour and 45 minutes, including all the waiting for the handpays...and do you believe I'm no longer welcome there to play?

---

So all of a sudden you don't have a $2500 stop win? And if true you are in good company. Many strip casinos are known for backing off "over-royaled" players. Most top tier pros back themselves off before getting over-royaled because of it.

---

So there are top tier pros who keep themselves from being "over royaled"? Does this mean they get a crystal ball along with the AP ring, card, and secret handshake?

---

Alan, quit being intentionally stupid. It was well known and still is you can get the ban hammer for hitting royals too quickly. It's about the quickest way to lose a casino. But it happens to players on better games, not the stupid shit you play.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

So all of a sudden you don't have a $2500 stop win? And if true you are in good company. Many strip casinos are known for backing off "over-royaled" players. Most top tier pros back themselves off before getting over-royaled because of it.

---

So there are top tier pros who keep themselves from being "over royaled"? Does this mean they get a crystal ball along with the AP ring, card, and secret handshake?

---

Alan, quit being intentionally stupid. It was well known and still is you can get the ban hammer for hitting royals too quickly. It's about the quickest way to lose a casino. But it happens to players on better games, not the stupid shit you play.

---

Suppose you tell me how a player keeps themselves from being over royaled? When dealt AsKsQsJs2s do they intentionally hold the dealt flush? LOL

Alan was not talking about his own play. He is very honest about his own play. He was talking about a 3rd parties play. I'm sure a lot of you have a friend or something who you tell stories about that may or may not be completely accurate.

I mean, I keep hearing stories about a guy breaking up 3 queens and hitting a royal. Could be legit, could be BS.

Back off him a bit. He is remembering as he remembers. He most likely didn't sleep the entire weekend except for the car ride in and back so he wasn't exactly in the best state of mind to remember details of anything especially some information that wasn't exactly his.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SLaPiNFuNK

Alan was not talking about his own play. He is very honest about his own play. He was talking about a 3rd parties play. I'm sure a lot of you have a friend or something who you tell stories about that may or may not be completely accurate.

I mean, I keep hearing stories about a guy breaking up 3 queens and hitting a royal. Could be legit, could be BS.

Back off him a bit. He is remembering as he remembers. He most likely didn't sleep the entire weekend except for the car ride in and back so he wasn't exactly in the best state of mind to remember details of anything especially some information that wasn't exactly his.

---

Thank you. In other words, I remember Jason telling me he hit four royals plus another $4,000 jackpot. Jason plays independently of me. I guess I heard it wrong. I didn't watch Jason play and he didn't watch me, though we did sit together when he hit the $26,000 royal at Bellagio and we did sit side by side when almost simultaneously he hit an $8K royal and I hit a $4k royal at the machines facing the restrooms in the Palace Casino at Caesars.

Even if he did not hit four single line royals he still had one heck of a run. And if anyone doubts he hit that royal at Bellagio I have the photo on my camera and I can easily upload it.

Ahh yes that’s true Alan is honest about his own play. he never said he THREW 18 yo’s In a row. ShShSh

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

So there are top tier pros who keep themselves from being "over royaled"? Does this mean they get a crystal ball along with the AP ring, card, and secret handshake?

---

Alan, quit being intentionally stupid. It was well known and still is you can get the ban hammer for hitting royals too quickly. It's about the quickest way to lose a casino. But it happens to players on better games, not the stupid shit you play.

---

Suppose you tell me how a player keeps themselves from being over royaled? When dealt AsKsQsJs2s do they intentionally hold the dealt flush? LOL

---

They quit playing, dumass. Geez, you're dense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SLaPiNFuNK

Alan was not talking about his own play. He is very honest about his own play. He was talking about a 3rd parties play. I'm sure a lot of you have a friend or something who you tell stories about that may or may not be completely accurate.

I mean, I keep hearing stories about a guy breaking up 3 queens and hitting a royal. Could be legit, could be BS.

Back off him a bit. He is remembering as he remembers. He most likely didn't sleep the entire weekend except for the car ride in and back so he wasn't exactly in the best state of mind to remember details of anything especially some information that wasn't exactly his.

---

Thank you. In other words, I remember Jason telling me he hit four royals plus another $4,000 jackpot. Jason plays independently of me. I guess I heard it wrong. I didn't watch Jason play and he didn't watch me, though we did sit together when he hit the $26,000 royal at Bellagio and we did sit side by side when almost simultaneously he hit an $8K royal and I hit a $4k royal at the machines facing the restrooms in the Palace Casino at Caesars.

Even if he did not hit four single line royals he still had one heck of a run. And if anyone doubts he hit that royal at Bellagio I have the photo on my camera and I can easily upload it.

---

Thank You’s don’t pay his bills you deadbeat dad, POS. Say all you want but you continuing to gamble instead of giving every dollar you don’t need for the basics of life shows what kind of person you are. Hell you should be working FT, PT, whatever to make money to pay your debt to your son. Not sure how anyone can argue with that.

Face it you are a dengenerate loser who can’t even pay his obligations to his own son. And worse yet still gambles Money owed to others.

Forums are filled with some lowlife losers, but through your actions it hard to find a bigger deadbeat than you when it’s your own son you f’d. Not many can match that Alan, Congratulations!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Alan, quit being intentionally stupid. It was well known and still is you can get the ban hammer for hitting royals too quickly. It's about the quickest way to lose a casino. But it happens to players on better games, not the stupid shit you play.

---

Suppose you tell me how a player keeps themselves from being over royaled? When dealt AsKsQsJs2s do they intentionally hold the dealt flush? LOL

---

They quit playing before it happens, numnuts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Suppose you tell me how a player keeps themselves from being over royaled? When dealt AsKsQsJs2s do they intentionally hold the dealt flush? LOL

---

They quit playing before it happens, numnuts.

---

Hey mickey--you know those three $2 single line royals and aces with the kicker I hit in about 100 minutes on the machine at South Point? THOSE were all on a -ev game. And I got banned.

What say you, now that you put your man-tit in the wringer again?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SLaPiNFuNK

Back off him a bit. He is remembering as he remembers. He most likely didn't sleep the entire weekend except for the car ride in and back so he wasn't exactly in the best state of mind to remember details of anything ...

---

On the subject of your father's impaired memory: do you think his lousy health / medical condition affects his ability to think and remember properly, and if so to what degree?

Your old man has been saying he remembers seeing things that pretty much any swinging dick with a pluse calls "bullshit" on, especially the claim of seeing eighteen yos in a row at Caesars.

What do you know if anything about his now infamous eighteen yos in a row claim?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SLaPiNFuNK

Back off him a bit. He is remembering as he remembers. He most likely didn't sleep the entire weekend except for the car ride in and back so he wasn't exactly in the best state of mind to remember details of anything ...

---

On the subject of your father's impaired memory: do you think his lousy health / medical condition affects his ability to think and remember properly, and if so to what degree?

Your old man has been saying he remembers seeing things that pretty much any swinging dick with a pluse calls "bullshit" on, especially the claim of seeing eighteen yos in a row at Caesars.

What do you know if anything about his now infamous eighteen yos in a row claim?

---

I don't know... But all I know is he gambles a lot and sees a lot... I've seen a lot...

I've seen a lady hit two royals within 10 minutes on a .25 single line... I've seen a guy throw $100 on midnight for an hour and it never hit... We were both at a table with a guy throwing out 3way reds only on the come out and progressively raising them from $300 to $50,000 until he went through 100K. No one at the table hit for him... However nearly every roll was point then 7, but he only bet the comeout... I've seen him get paid for 4awk and then on the very next spin get 4awk after the hand pay... He has held the dice for 45 minutes on a fast moving table... He has also held the dice for 45 minutes on a very slow table.. when morongo first started their card craps they went through an entire paid of shoes without a 7out, he turned $100 into 7 or 8 thousand that night... He told me not to buy in because the streak was going to end.... He has literally a ton of stories that are true...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SLaPiNFuNK

I don't know... But all I know is he gambles a lot and sees a lot... I've seen a lot...

I've seen a lady hit two royals within 10 minutes on a .25 single line... I've seen a guy throw $100 on midnight for an hour and it never hit... We were both at a table with a guy throwing out 3way reds only on the come out and progressively raising them from $300 to $50,000 until he went through 100K. No one at the table hit for him... However nearly every roll was point then 7, but he only bet the comeout... I've seen him get paid for 4awk and then on the very next spin get 4awk after the hand pay... He has held the dice for 45 minutes on a fast moving table... He has also held the dice for 45 minutes on a very slow table.. when morongo first started their card craps they went through an entire paid of shoes without a 7out, he turned $100 into 7 or 8 thousand that night... He told me not to buy in because the streak was going to end.... He has literally a ton of stories that are true...

---

I don't think anyone's questioning actual "normal" stories or events. There's a difference between something that is 1-in-1,000,000 vs 1-in-39,346,408,075,296,537,575,424. There's also a difference between a one off story of "this crazy thing happened" story versus multiple stories of crazy things happening.

5 royals in a 24-hour period (let's call it 20 hours of play at 800 HPH) is certainly possible. It's about 1 in 16k-17k (whether you calculate it as "exactly 5" or "5 or more"). But it's not just how likely is something to happen -- but the source.

800 hands an hour is slooooooooow

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SLaPiNFuNK

800 hands an hour is slooooooooow

---

IIRC, Alan said he plays at about 400 HPH. Although, I have no idea how he would come up with such a number. Idk how fast you play, but given that you're not an AP, I figured you'd probably play slower than APs do. Remember, this is before I realized how fast you might play or whatever.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SLaPiNFuNK

800 hands an hour is slooooooooow

---

Hey, fuck you, buddy! I have arthritis. (Kidding about the fuck you part)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Axel: Do you believe I hit three $2 royals and four aces w/kicker on a single line $2 machine at South Point in one hour and 45 minutes, including all the waiting for the handpays...and do you believe I'm no longer welcome there to play?

---

I don't, at least in part, because Rob wrote about it here and had a different story:

Quote:

---

This all happened within a span of about 3.5 to 4 hours

---

In a few more years he will probably say it was 45 minutes. Who knows, or cares, about the rest of it.

What was truly fascinating about that episode was what Rob posted about it around 20 hours after his initial post:

Quote:

---

I've had back-to-back royals on a quarter machine in my AP days. Nothing like this though. Did anyone notice the sequential? I haven't seen one of those in person in over 20 years when I hit one in Laughlin.

---

It was as if he had never seen that it was a sequential before then...

But the more interesting part is how he said "I haven't seen one of those in person in over 20 years when I hit one in Laughlin".

In this post JBJB states he has had 3 sequential royals, and Rob responds with

Quote:

---

I've also had 3--one of them dealt at the Riverside in their 25th anniversary year in the '90's...

---

Two messages below that Alan wrote:

Quote:

---

When I sent you my photo from Caesars you told me you hit only one yourself

---

More than a few people have mentioned that Rob seems to have a pattern of needing to meet or exceed the claims of others, so who knows what the truth is. Each reader has to decide whether Rob or Alan is more reputable.

In that same post Alan was kind enough to post an image he stated Rob sent him "7 years ago", which would have been 8 or 9 years ago at the time, of Rob hitting a $20,000 sequential royal at Wynn:

https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/at...1&d=1436384498

I found it rather amazing that Rob stated he had "not seen one in 20 years", apparently forgetting all about this previous win. How many people reading this think they could have forgotten a 20K sequential royal at Wynn?

But wait! There's more!

In this thread at WOV Jerry Logan, the guy that was definitely "NOT Rob" although his posts were eerily similar to Rob's with constant put downs and self-aggrandizing along with an almost incestuous like banter between the 2 of them where they both praised each other as being the most accomplished players on the forum, stated he won a 20K sequential in Laughlin. While "Jerry" wasn't able to figure out how to post an image, another member, (thecesspit) posted it for him, with both confirming it was Jerry's.

Guess what? It was the EXACT same image that Rob sent to Alan 8 or 9 years before, which you can see on WOV at this link.

"Jerry" went on to try the same thing at another forum but was busted because he tried to pass it off as being at the Aquarius but it was shown it was actually taken at Wynn.

You can all make your own decisions on the importance and validity of all of this.

As for Rob's claims about the Fezzik bet, he's lying. He made a bet and Fezzik agreed. Rob added conditions, and Fezzik agreed. Rob then put in a stipulation that if he won Fezzik would have to say Rob is the greatest video poker player ever, that he could never say anything bad about Rob on his radio show, and that if anyone on the show said anything bad about Rob then Fezzik would have to pay a penalty to Rob. It's no surprise that Fezzik refused at that point. Unfortunately, the online evidence of that disappeared when the Las Vegas Advisor put in a new forum.

Rob says he posted it in the newspaper so I'm sure he can come up with the evidence of that. Unless it's in a storage shed like everything else seems to be.

Believe who you want. Unlike Rob, I don't give a damn. But I'd guess there is a better chance of seeing 18 yo's in a row than there is of ever seeing persuasive documentation of anything from Rob.

I noticed all of this when it was originally posted, but I stopped participating here primarily a few years ago because Alan was constantly "speaking" for Rob and dismissing the importance of just about anything that wasn't favorable to Rob. It was bad enough to read Rob's dribble but why bother posting when his apologist constantly covers for him. But it seemed timely to post it now given some of the recent threads.

And now the fun begins. First up will be Rob stating he didn't read this and that I'm a horrible writer and need to be more concise. He'll probably then say he planned the entire thing because he knew he could "catch me" that way. Next up will be how I can't sleep at night because he's completely "in my head" and that I've spent 16 zillion hours writing this. As usual, I probably won't post for months but Rob will continue to denigrate me on a near daily basis, proving exactly who is in who's head. It inevitable that Rob will probably claim everything I wrote is a lie, or perhaps "fake news", so if anyone checks the links please post what you find.

It's gonna be fun!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

They quit playing before it happens, numnuts.

---

Hey mickey--you know those three $2 single line royals and aces with the kicker I hit in about 100 minutes on the machine at South Point? THOSE were all on a -ev game. And I got banned.

What say you, now that you put your man-tit in the wringer again?

---

I once hit three royals in less than 2000 hands....on a 101.8% game.

Jason is a very fast VP player. I recently posted three videos of me going thru $50 of free play at Red Rock. I don't think I play faster than 500 hands an hour. 400 might be right especially at higher denominations.

I don't recall getting that sequential royal photo from Rob. Can you provide more info. I hit one sequential myself. Jbjb hit three sequentials? And you criticize me?

Great detective work, spock. Jerry, er, Robbie, your lies are catching up to you.

Spock's detective work and historical summary is pristine. Kudos. Now that is what I would call investigative reporting.

I seem to remember that the "Jerry Logan" Aquarius/Wynn switcheroo snafu was at lvadvice.com. The forum owner wasn't putting up with any fakery, and he caught it immediately. "Jerry" was banned.

I can't keep up with you guys...

There is a difference between hitting a sequential royal on a machine that pays for it and one that doesn't... I mean... I get 4awk all the time playing bonus but it doesn't mean anything....

Again I don't remember that photo of Rob's sequential royal. Can you give a link to my post about it?

Jerry Logan, the good old days !!

Fantastic work Spock! Unfortunately, since misremembering and forgetfulness are now bonafide excuses for posting inaccuracies and contradictions, I'm afraid the old troll can say whatever he wants with impunity! Sort of like how seniors get away with shoplifting. That's how Rob has been able to get away with stealing bologna for his sandwiches in order to keep his strength up to post baloney on this site!

You can tell Eddie's been fuming....

Is how much time between 3 royals and the aces important to anybody whether it's an hour or four? Only to someone who is so hurt because they were proven with W2G's I guess. The $5 sequential at the Wynn? It was a smaller win to be at the time. Only Spock would waste so much time with his Rachel Maddow the impression once again. While he tries to point out meaningless inaccuracies, he actually makes me look better.

It's obvious why he spent the time doing this. He again sees me making others here look weak and foolish by them cowering out of another simple challenge, or how I put these people down for the lies they tell. He has never been able to handle whenever this occurs, so he stays up hours searching for ANYTHING that might be contradictory. But he usually makes me look better than I realized I do in the process. The dollar dealt sequential with the $25,000 bonus at the Riverside over 20 years ago? I can hardly remember that!

Anyway, his nonsense about the Fezzik acceptance of the published bet is just that. Both The Sun and GT would have reported any comments from the HP crowd other than their decline. It would have been nice of Spock to report on the article's identifying where I deposited my $640,000 (did I get that amount right Spock?) but that part hurts too much, doesn't it....

Once again we have jealousy. I don't blame anyone one bit. I enjoy doing it to the little people :)

Again I don't remember that photo of Rob's sequential royal. Can you give a link to my post about it? This same image was purportedly used to report two separate royals? Can we see both links?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Again I don't remember that photo of Rob's sequential royal. Can you give a link to my post about it? This same image was purportedly used to report two separate royals? Can we see both links?

---

I do remember that $5 sequential Alan, and I remember hitting it at Wynn maybe around 2009? Good thing for Spock--hard to keep them and all these fond memories straight.
What do you mean it was reported twice?? Isn't once enuf for these guys :)

From Spock's post:

"While "Jerry" wasn't able to figure out how to post an image, another member, (thecesspit) posted it for him, with both confirming it was Jerry's.

Guess what? It was the EXACT same image that Rob sent to Alan 8 or 9 years before, which you can see on WOV at this link."

Spock has the link to WOV. But I don't recall posting that image myself. So I'm asking for my link.

Never mind I found it. On my phone the text link didn't show up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Never mind I found it. On my phone the text link didn't show up.

---

Then if true Spock helped confirm another popular lie about me--that I'm Jerry Logan--a lie even Shack said he didn't believe. I would never re-post an old royal under an "alias". Again, thank you Spock!

Alan, you don't need to spend the time looking for this stuff. When Spock wakes up from his half-day nap, I'm sure he'll be glad to spend another 24 hours looking up old info that he can spin to help him sleep well. :)

The way I read Spock's post, Jerry Logan used your image of the sequential royal. What's missing, Rob, is the proof that you are Logan.

Did I get that right?

I believe that was the point, except Spock wants everybody to believe who he wants Logan to be.

However, the fact that he used my royal pic to claim it as his own is a little disturbing....but hardly important enuf to care about at this point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozzy

Jerry Logan, the good old days !!

---

Yeah, good old Jerry Logan. Mentioned Rob all the time in his posts. Rob taught Jerry everything he knew about video poker. He and Rob were big buddies. Jerry was a prolific poster too. You could tell he really loved the gambling forums. Then one day....he just fell off the end of the earth. Yeah, sure, he was given the ban hammer at WoV. But plenty of other gambling forums to go to.

But Jerry just disappeared. Hey, I know. Since him and Rob are big buddies we can ask Rob where Jerry is at these days.

Hey, Rob! What's your bosom buddy, Jerry Logan up to these days? Can you put up a screenshot of you two?

He calls himself redietz these days. He never worked a decent job for very long so he has no retirement savings, and he needs to sell "picks" to scrape out a living.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

I would never re-post an old royal under an "alias"

---

So are you saying that you never post photos when you are using one of your alias's?

Say hello to Aces Up for us too.

A question for me or you?

As I've said for an eternity now, I have never used, cared to use, or needed to use an alias on any forum anywhere, without first identifying who I really was. And my offer to the bozos stands (got that spock/eddie?): If anybody can prove, with clear irrefutable scientific evidence, that I'm lying, I'll give them $25,000 in cash.

Get to work guys. That's more than any of you goobers make in 6 months.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

He calls himself redietz these days. He never worked a decent job for very long so he has no retirement savings, and he needs to sell "picks" to scrape out a living.

---

What happened, Rob? Did you quit your job driving truck again?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

A question for me or you?

As I've said for an eternity now, I have never used, cared to use, or needed to use an alias on any forum anywhere, without first identifying who I really was. And my offer to the bozos stands (got that spock/eddie?): If anybody can prove, with clear irrefutable scientific evidence, that I'm lying, I'll give them $25,000 in cash.

Get to work guys. That's more than any of you goobers make in 6 months.

---

Put the money in escrow then we will get to work.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

From Spock's post:

"While "Jerry" wasn't able to figure out how to post an image, another member, (thecesspit) posted it for him, with both confirming it was Jerry's.

Guess what? It was the EXACT same image that Rob sent to Alan 8 or 9 years before, which you can see on WOV at this link."

Spock has the link to WOV. But I don't recall posting that image myself. So I'm asking for my link.

---

Did Rob ever post any pictures on WoV before Jerry tried to?

Mickeycrimm are you putting up any money for the Singer challenge?

I suggest that all of us WHO ARE NOT PUTTING UP MONEY stay out of the discussion and just observe what actually happens. The cross talk is not productive. We'll all soon know if this will happen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

The way I read Spock's post, Jerry Logan used your image of the sequential royal. What's missing, Rob, is the proof that you are Logan.

Did I get that right?

---

LOL. Or, conversely, the proof that he isn't.

I just read, for the first time, the exchanges between "Jerry Logan" and "Rob Singer" that Spock linked. I suggest everyone do the same.

Jesus, Rob wasn't subtle in those days.

Thanks for the laugh, Spock. Much appreciated.

The #1 thing I do to you guys here is make you jump thru all the hoops I set for you.

I'll never be forgotten....even though I'll probably live long past most or all of you.

Red you'll never wise up so I won't say it :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

The #1 thing I do to you guys here is make you jump thru all the hoops I set for you.

I'll never be forgotten....even though I'll probably live long past most or all of you.

Red you'll never wise up so I won't say it :)

---

Oh, Robbbbbbbieeeeeee!!! Here you are making a post over an hour after kim lee made a challenge to you but you are ignoring him Why?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

The #1 thing I do to you guys here is make you jump thru all the hoops I set for you.

I'll never be forgotten....even though I'll probably live long past most or all of you.

Red you'll never wise up so I won't say it :)

---

Oh, Robbbbbbbieeeeeee!!! Here you are making a post over an hour after kim lee made a challenge to you but you are ignoring him Why?

---

A challenge to me? Where?