Membership here is merit-based?Quote:
Originally Posted by BoSox
I'm gonna need Mr V to check the rulebook, and give a legal opinion on that.
In the meantime...kiss my ass, you fucktard.
Printable View
Membership here is merit-based?Quote:
Originally Posted by BoSox
I'm gonna need Mr V to check the rulebook, and give a legal opinion on that.
In the meantime...kiss my ass, you fucktard.
What do you mean?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
He's obviously not scared of getting dirty...he looks like Pigpen from Peanuts.
Shut it down, POKERGRINDER. ---> Risk Retention Group.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
https://anagram-solver.net/shut%20it...0?partial=true
I only ASKED what HE would accept as proof, not you , not others. I have always said posting up pictures of jackpots, chips etc is meaningless since things can me faked and manipulated.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgPretty much the best "AxelAss" could come up with is that the casino logins belong to someone else or represent only some of the casinos I played at, but just to show what an inaccurate mind he has and how low his level of reading comprehension is, he must have (1) missed simple logic day at school (third grade), (2) not read or thought about what I already wrote.
And then, look at this! :D
It's pathetic that the drunken fool wants to offer some of the same pieces of evidence that I have posted to try to prove himself. If only he could figure out how to operate a camera and post images on the internet that is. Tens of thousands of posts later he still hasn't managed to figure that out.
One of the most hilarious pieces of evidence he wants to offer is talking to "a casino executive" - he and his friend DarkAss had been going on about how it might be possible to bribe your casino host to tell someone that you had won, such that even if my casino hosts verified my play or wins that this might be meaningless, and yet here "AxelAss" is now saying that this piece of information would have to be accepted. As others have said on here, "You can't make this shit up."
The point is,I think the fact that he's trying to offer (again, if only he could figure out how to operate a camera and post images on the internet) some of the same pieces of evidence that he claims are not genuine or prove nothing as posted at my end, just shows what a pathetic two-face this guy has.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Even if I had never posted any evidence to back up what I said, three years of chronicles and not any contradictions. If I were asked in person about any of these trips, which the Wizard actually did ask me about them during a half hour phone call we had, I'd simply relate what happened, and it would match what I posted here. That is what happened during my call with the Wizard - I didn't have to think about any of his questions other than by recollecting exactly what had transpired.
If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything.
Sounds like a con to me. I'm sure there are people out there who would be willing to move 10btc to make a quick $500 and split the profit with you. For all I know someone could buy bitcoin on margin just to make a quick transaction(I don't know enough about it to make that assessment).Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Pshaw.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
I don't work for free.
PM me for info on the amount of initial retainer you must pre-pay, and once I have the dough I'll give you my opinion.
FYI I would never let anyone view my bank account records or balances. Its very unlikely I would be posting a bunch of pictures in public. All just to prove to a few people on some silly forums (mostly AP haters) I'm a successful Advantage Player, especially when there are many people who have meet me over the years who know the truth.Quote:
Originally Posted by blackholeQuote:
Originally Posted by Darkoz
That’s not true. That’s just you talking out of your ass again.
At least Axel offered up some proof to back up his claims.
All you offer is dead plays other people wrote about and try claiming them as your own.
If you handed me a billion dollars I'm positive I could bribe KewlJ to let you have your way with him.
This was posted in the Adventures of MDawg Thread post 2226
Today, 05:32 AM #2226
blackhole
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Any numbers or plays I have claimed are 100% true. None is or was that unbelievable. Again, I ask what would you accept as proof? And if I were to prove whatever claim, then what? Ill ask again since you seemed have missed it. What if a Casino Executive said I was and advantage player and beat his casino? What about A lawyer? How about court documents? Why would casinos 86 me for Advantage play if I wasn't making money? Would pictures of jackpot's and the W2G's to go along with it be satisfactory? How about pictures of cash added to it? What about an account log in that shows my deposits and my cash outs?
(my response)
I was going to leave this alone but find it irresistible not to take you up on a few offers you made.
Pictures of Jackpots and the W2G’s sound great, then throwing in a bunch of cash sounds like some added entertainment. I really like the offer of account log in showing deposits and your cash outs? A year’s worth would be sufficient. I do expect to view serious transactions. If you want to throw in some court documents, don’t let me hold you back.
So, start posting the pictures, and pm me details for the bank log-in. You could always delete the log in after whatever you decide is enough time. Even 10 minutes would do. Just tell me date and time and don't forget I'm on the east coast EST
P.S. I would also confirm your the real deal and should have more money then you'll ever need for the rest of your life. After that I'll just fade away and leave you and your forums in peace.
I don't even know what more money then you'll even need for the rest of your life means. Since My Wife is 10 years younger than me, it's more important that I have enough for the rest of her life.
I wouldn't jump though major hoops digging out every ounce of proof I have matching everything up taking tons of photos etc, just to make you happy. If I felt you would accept a reasonable amount of proof and not have to worry that information be leaked to others I would be willing to. I just have a feeling that whatever I came up with wouldn't be enough and you would just come back and start the BS up again. As I have already pointed out... when you first arrived, for the longest time I was respectful of you, answered questions, had private conversations, even wishing you well about your heath talked about some of my past heath problems etc. And yet you came back from time to time with more aggression and hate, twisted my conversations with you into that claiming I was trying to con you or some BS. Given the circumstances and your history towards me and in general towards gamblers. I have to think carefully what I would be willing to provide and how I could be assured it's not used to harm me in anyway. I know there are a bunch of people reading this who are thinking I'm an Idiot for even contemplating any of this.
I'll pay you what I think your opinion is worth...stercus.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Blackhole, the thing with AxelAss is that he's as two faced as they come. I don't know if it has to do with mood swings such as PokerGrinder and KewlJ suffer from, or alcoholism, but he's a different person from day to day.
https://i.imgur.com/RLD2xcEl.jpg
https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/08534cc...7-54feecc1cf14
https://i.imgur.com/1fXMHcx.jpg
And this is the thing about this guy. He always jumps the gun and says he will do this or that, then later recants.
SAME thing he did with Wizard's watch. Made an irrevocable sight unseen offer to buy it, then later reconsidered and said, "only if it's a good deal." How can you deal with someone like that? His word and handshake are worth literally zilch. Constantly putting himself out there then reconsidering.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
V--it's an old system but you should still recognize it. it's called Eenie Meenie Miney Mo. Us old guys used to use it years ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
It still works for the "craps pro's". Ha.
Keep grasping at air, because its all you have. I like how I'M the star of your very own fake world. Just how many threads is it you have you started about me now? If I wasn't around you would have nothing and be forgotten.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
SAME thing he did with Wizard's watch. Made an irrevocable sight unseen offer to buy it, then later reconsidered and said, "only if it's a good deal." How can you deal with someone like that? His word and handshake are worth literally zilch. Constantly putting himself out there then reconsidering.
https://i.imgur.com/NrPzHYd.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/zmI4Avl.jpg
There is no such thing as bad press. But there may be such a thing as bad AxelAss!
:cool:
I like the sound of that.
Welll, in that case Axel and I should go on the road together.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
So here we have a big time lawyer with multi millions (what is it...40, 50, 100 million now?) jet -setting high rolling baccarat aficionado. How does it feel being owned and controlled by little old drunken, uneducated AxelWolf?Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgThere is no such thing as bad press. But there may be such a thing as bad AxelAss!
:cool:
I like the sound of that.
Welll, in that case Axel and I should go on the road together.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Your a warrior Axel, if only I could say the same, about that grubby bastard PG :)Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfSo here we have a big time lawyer with multi millions (what is it...40, 50, 100 million now?) jet -setting high rolling baccarat aficionado. How does it feel being owned and controlled by little old drunken, uneducated AxelWolf?Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgThere is no such thing as bad press. But there may be such a thing as bad AxelAss!
:cool:
I like the sound of that.
Welll, in that case Axel and I should go on the road together.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
He does look a little grubby, doesn't he(-: I guess that's how those young guys roll nowadays.Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyYour a warrior Axel, if only I could say the same, about that grubby bastard PG :)Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfSo here we have a big time lawyer with multi millions (what is it...40, 50, 100 million now?) jet -setting high rolling baccarat aficionado. How does it feel being owned and controlled by little old drunken, uneducated AxelWolf?Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
so we have the following people that believe MD's BACCARART BS
Barney, blackhole, coach belly, Garnabby, MDawg, RS__, Tasha, theywontpayontuesday
1)Barney (known sock puppet/Troll?=gandabby? I don't know, I don't pay much attention to them guys, they are too far out in left field)
2)Blackhole (I dont know if he actually believes it I seen him call out MD in the past)
3)Coach Belly(as if he couldn't predict that)
4)Grandabby see #1
5) RS_ Doesn't believe him he just believes MD is mental enough to believe his own BS
6)Tasha (ROTFLMAO we don't need to talk about that, do we?)
7) theywontpayontuesday I don't know enough about this person.. I'm sure others know.(someone's sock puppet?)
8) MDAWG VOTED FOR HIMSELF LOL.
So perhaps one legit person. I'll round up and say 2.
Also 7 or 8 regulars who haven't voted, who would vote NO, but are holding out.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Better question is which is more believable. Singer's Newell or Mdog's wins ??
The poll was stolen...there are zero legitimate people who voted NO.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
And there are at least 50 other regular readers that haven't voted, who would vote YES,
but they don't feel like logging on to vote.
Also, tewlj allowed voting well past the posted deadline, that's corruption,
and the last 6 NO votes shouldn't count.
So MDawg wins by a landslide.
LOL
Just like Trump "won."
Bwa ha ha ha
Early on, I had a micro shred of belief ( less then 0.5% ) that Singer was going too pull it off. With BigDog zero chance. So close race, edge goes to Robby.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
You still have another month of voting to go to vote online or send in those mail-in votes coach.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyThe poll was stolen...there are zero legitimate people who voted NO.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
And there are at least 50 other regular readers that haven't voted, who would vote YES,
but they don't feel like logging on to vote.
Also, tewlj allowed voting well past the posted deadline, that's corruption,
and the last 6 NO votes shouldn't count.
So MDawg wins by a landslide.
You think that Singer's photos and documents are more legit than MDawg's ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
I wonder if any would change their vote now that we know it is a progression betting system, which CANNOT turn a negative EV game in to a long term winning strategy.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Probably wouldn't since half are just using their vote to troll.
I just might have more to say about Mdawgs progression system when I get home in a bit...just maybe.:rolleyes:
Very early on, there was a very slim chance, that Singer could pull it off. That became close to nil, near the end. Now it became ZERO.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyYou think that Singer's photos and documents are more legit than MDawg's ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
You created the poll just to troll.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Besides...you cheated.
Stop the Steal.
Smack the side of you're head...you're skipping.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
But here is the thing KJ. Its all fake. Zero chance he is betting at the level he claims. Let assume he is betting $25 a hand. His system is simply guessing and then making up numbers to impress you.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI wonder if any would change their vote now that we know it is a progression betting system, which CANNOT turn a negative EV game in to a long term winning strategy.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Probably wouldn't since half are just using their vote to troll.
I just might have more to say about Mdawgs progression system when I get home in a bit...just maybe.:rolleyes:
Why is that?Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyYou created the poll just to troll.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Is this question for me? Why is what?Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Disregard, I thought you called him a troll for starting a poll. Would you say that the multiple threads MDawg started about me and others were also for trolling purposes?Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyIs this question for me? Why is what?Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
No I don't.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
MDawg posted his adventures thread at WOV,
then you and your group of gaping asshole butt buddies immediately trolled him.
Everything after that is MD's response to the trolling that you and your cohorts initiated,
and so I don't consider MD to be trolling you.
When I say
some bozo like KewlJ comes in and claims that "Hey guys, he plays a progression." No wonder this guy is universally scorned and booted off most every forum and website. And we don't need a poll to establish that he LOSES at blackjack - he admits it himself. The guy has lost multiple years. And is now sitting there with a puzzled expression wondering where did all the wasted years go?Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Part of the reason KewlJ loses at blackjack is because he's afraid TO jack the bet up when he needs to. He hesitates, gets emotional, nurses his beer, starts uncontrollably yapping out a rigid doll like face, and ends up DNI'ed. (I believe it. He ends up DNI'ed.)
I believe it. I believe it!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trjDFPAij40
Please help me to understand MDrag!Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgWhen I say
some bozo like KewlJ comes in and claims that "Hey guys, he plays a progression." No wonder this guy is universally scorned and booted off most every forum and website. And we don't need a poll to establish that he LOSES at blackjack - he admits it himself. The guy has lost multiple years. And is now sitting there with a puzzled expression wondering where did all the wasted years go?Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Part of the reason KewlJ loses at blackjack is because he's afraid TO jack the bet up when he needs to. He hesitates, gets emotional, nurses his beer, starts uncontrollably yapping out a rigid doll like face, and ends up DNI'ed. (I believe it. He ends up DNI'ed.)
I believe it. I believe it!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trjDFPAij40
You believe losing in gambling is caused by not raising your bets when needed?
And you scorn the accusation that you use a progressive betting system? You simply to quote you "jack up the bets when necessary". (Am I missing something or is jacking up the bets when necessary the definition of a progression system)
Flat betting doesn't work.
Failing to jack the bet up when necessary doesn't work.
But neither does mechanically just increasing or decreasing the bet without regards to the shoe.
In any case, whatever I am doing has led to years of success. Whatever KewlJ has done has led to his sitting on his arse, puzzled and confused as to where all the wasted years have gone. And whatever you have done has led to...the bus depot.
Lie after lie after lie. I have never had a losing year. I don't drink much at all anymore, never at a casino. And believe me, I know when to jack up my bet an it has noting to do with what occurred on the last hand. It has to do with my advantage at any given time. Something you know nothing about because you don't play with an advantage. You play a losing game.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
With all this lying you do, I highly doubt you are an attorney, even though the profession has been known to lie. YOU are unable to tell the truth about anything and it would eventually catch up with you and be cause for disbarment....that is IF you were an attorney, instead of just make believe on the forums. :D
Really?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
What would cause you to raise your bet from X on one hand up to 2X on the next hand?
An advantageous count and situation.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyReally?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
What would cause you to raise your bet from X on one hand up to 2X on the next hand?
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
How would the count and situation become more advantageous to prompt you to raise your bet?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
How is asking questions of every answer to common sense advantageous to coach bellyQuote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
How would the count and situation become more advantageous to prompt you to raise your bet?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Truthfully anyone who has to spend $5000 plus in order to tell time is a retard.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Coach belly is trying to play his usual coach belly "gottch ya" troll games. he wants me to say because small cards came out on previous rounds and then he can say, then it does have to do with what occurred in previous rounds.Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkoz
BUT, that is not what MDawg said or implied. He was talking about changing his bests based on the win loss result of the last round.
Bottom line: There is just no reason to interact with this guy anymore. He is the definition of an asshole and internet troll. No more coach belly. Blocked!
Hey MDawg, did anyone ever tell you that you come off as an insufferable, arrogant douchebag?
Well, you do and you are.
Fucknuts like you give us lawyers a bad rep, and that's tough to do.
Go back to doctoring your timesheet and hitting on the hired help you fucking clown.
I'm not looking for an advantage, I'm looking to expose liars.Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkoz
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
You defend the #1 Liar on the forums today. You really believe this guy has 10's of millions in BTC?Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
I'm not looking for an advantage, I'm looking to expose liars.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
The closest MD has been to being a lawyer was the time when he was allowed to apply hemorrhoid cream to a paralegal's ass.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Did he claim that he did?Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
The problem with this clown is that his imagination gets the better of him. I've never even said exactly what I have, in any context, not with regards to any of my assets. This insecure clown is the one who feels the need to go on and on about his cars that he's owned, where he lives, how he lives, and so on. You know when someone has very little right? when he goes on and on listing exactly what he has. Which who cares if he has a lot or has a little. It's just annoying that he feels compelled to try to judge others, this clown, among men.
If you go back and read his original post and what he has said since, basically YES. I looked up how much BTC was at the time and did a rough calculation. He also claims he has been buying it since and he claims to have never sold any.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyDid he claim that he did?Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Go read the BTC forum on WOV he got taken to task while pretending to know about BTC. It was hilarious watching him try to cover it up and tap-dance with more BS. Also it was funny when we were negotiating the 5k challenge, he didn't understand how it worked then. That was one of his excuses why he didn't want to use BTC as a method.
Add that to his fake stock BS where he uses a simulator.
Go back to listing every vehicle you have every owned in your life, clown, trying to prove that you haven't had your license jerked for drunken driving. That was a fascinating diatribe.
Just because you keep repeating the same nonsense about me, doesn't make any of it true. Your perception and reality are two very different things.
I can't figure out what original post you mean.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
My eyes glazed over with that BTC thread, lots of misunderstandings that I couldn't follow.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Seems like he was getting trolled, what else is new ?
You WOV regulars are a bunch of douchebags, always have been.
You gotta know that, or you're clueless.
He would have been a fool to post $5k for the challenge by any method, he wouldn't have gotten it back under any circumstances.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
There is no way this guy is an attorney MrV. Even California would disbar his lying, mentally deranged ass.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
If you read his story, he claims to have taken time off from gambling from early 2000's until 2018, while he pursued his law degree and license. For my money, that was the period he was in prison. That is exactly what he talks and acts like, a gutter mouth, lying convict, who spent too much time in the prison yard.
I guess my line about his yapping uncontrollably out of a rigid doll face while nursing a beer at a queer bar hit a little too close to home.
That and the fact that he lost year over year at blackjack and finally had to give up. I surmise that today is his "manic" day. Yesterday he was depressed.
What's sad in a way is that no one sticks up for KewlJ. Everyone dislikes him. Why is that?
MDawg hands down. MDawg is not even close to being in the home stretch with Singer's Newel lie. Really, MDawg is not even on the same track. MDawg's ability to maintain consistency along with the quality of corroborating evidence is actually a work of art if it is all fake.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
It wasn't a "line", it was a lie. That is all you do is post lies. About me. About Axelwolf. About BoSox. About just about every AP and person that has challenged your fictitious/fantasy claims. Even people who haven't posted here like PokerGrinder. And everyone knows everything you are saying are lies. Even you little group of other anti-AP haters and angry dues that support you.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
You are so stupid, you don't even know how credibility works. People read these lies, even members from other forums, that you are still trying feed your BS and they know these are all lies, because they know the people you are lying about, whether personally or as longtime credible members of the community.
So what do you think that does? Do you think there is anybody, anywhere that is going to believe your fantasy stories now. You basically turned yourself into Rob Singer. A few people might enjoy the drama, but there is nobody, and I mean nobody that believes a word you say.
Come on, other than AxelAss, no one spends more time obsessing over me than KewlJ. Keep yapping uncontrollably out of that rigid doll face. About me.
What's sad in a way is that no one sticks up for KewlJ. Everyone dislikes him. Why is that?
You do realize that amiability is a positive trait that might work to your benefit to perhaps end your losing blackjack streak. Undesirable dislikables get booted fast - both from casinos, and forums, as you well know, KewlJ. Boot!
It is probably (long past) time to stop feeding this attention whoring troll. I am puting him on ignore and I suggest everyone else do as well. Let's leave him just talking to himself, just as he is doing on the forum where he is the only active poster.
MDawg, would you please give us all a clinic on how to choose between player and banker? Without your expertise we are all bound to fail. Surely, you will show some mercy and explain to us your expert strategy in choosing between player and banker.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgThe results here aren't what's important other than...it would make sense if nearly everyone here but me voted No, because that would simply re-affirm that it's not everyone who may win at casinos. Definitely the minority. If everyone won at casinos the lights would go out within a year.
In any case what this poll DOES establish:
1. That KewlJ knows nothing about Baccarat.
https://i.imgur.com/bwq6pLMl.jpg
Can't even spell the word correctly. Two c's. Baccarat is the game. (And while you're at it...i before e except after c.)
2. That, as I pointed out earlier today,
hence - the need for this poll.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
3. This is just representative of
In other words - given that this guy has already admitted that he lost at BlackJack in 2020, this means he lost other years too. This type of “out of bounds” no credibility person for him to admit one year of failure doesn’t just mean that he lost badly that year, it means that he has been lying his ass off about winning most of the other years too. Until he posts some PROOF that he has won at all, it must be assumed that he's just lying and lying about everything. I’d say Blackhole is right about this schmuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Finally, and I am not talking to Kewlj, that liar is nothing short of ridiculous, but the rest of you - how do you reconcile the fact that I won and posted proof of winning?
MDawg's 2020 Vegas Casino wins VERIFIED
MDawg's Recent Win/Loss in Vegas
What's the explanation for that I posted three years of day to day minute trip reports, complete with pictures of the play and markers and suites, and then at the end of each year posted verified win statements to corroborate the exact sums claimed.
I even posted proof of getting comp'ed. I've also posted proof of many of my stock trades on here, and here.
No one else in the history of these forums has ever posted anything close to this level of proof, and never will. Why?
Coming from the guy who posted hundreds of pages of watches, hotel suites, chips, cash, markers, stocks, Casino host discussions and bottles of complementary ketchup?Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Is there truly anyone who doesn't want to start laughing?
Are you saying the KewlJ is gone? Gone back to yapping uncontrollably out of a rigid doll face nursing a beer at a queer bar - but no longer here, for me to have to deal with? Hallelujah!
DrakOz, you know very well how that all started. I wanted to take a pic of my Baccarat contest ticket on just another routine day at the casino to show that I had made it past the semi-finals and I didn't want my name or player number to appear, so I took off my wrist and placed my Rolex DD 40 platinum over the ticket to shield the personal identifying info as I snapped an iPhone pic. Then, of course, AxelAss stepped in and said the watch was fake, which is because he doesn't know the real thing from his AxelAss in the ground. One thing led to another, and before you knew it I had posted some pics of some other watches by way of trying to show that YES those ARE my stacks of chips, look at my watch next to them, and even posted a video where I weighed some of them live to show that they were all genuine.
That's quite different from coming on here and boasting that I own ____ watches which believe me, I've posted even with the ten or fifteen watches that I have posted only a small portion of what I have. I don't even keep most of them at home, most, along with my casino winning cash and such are kept in a safe deposit box. Just gotta visit the vault occasionally and wind them up every now and then to keep them in good working order. As far as the pics of the chips, cash, markers, suites, etc. - that's all part of the trip report. These pics are incidental to the MDawg Adventure chronicles, not offered to prove anything other than that I was there!
You on the other hand, love to come in brag about "all the benjis" you have in your pocket. Recall that MaxPen I believe it was or maybe it was Boz called you out for that behavior and stated, quite rightly, that people with money don't talk that way.
I'm making trip reports here, and incidental to that are the pics of the winnings and accommodations. The watch thing just somewhat ballooned out of proportion it's not the main event by any means.
Thanks for reminding everyone about the sentiments of a memberQuote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
who had much more experience with those WOV pests than I did.
Same sentiments as mine, though...how about that?
It is his CLAIM that he is an attorney that is damaging; he may or may not really be an attorney.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
His profile says he lives in California, a state which I believe is unique in allowing two types of law schools: accredited and unaccredited.
Graduates of accredited schools can practice in any state in America; the others, the grads of unaccredited law schools, are prohibited from practicing law outside of California.
Unaccredited law schools basically suck, as do their graduating students, which I think should be obvious.
Their grads find careers as state bureaucrats if they're lucky or chasing ambulances if they're not: it's a damned shame .
Point is, pretty much any idiot with a pulse and enough money can attend law school in California, so the notion of bragging about being a California lawyer is sort of like bragging that you have two eyes and two hands.
My take: he's most likely spinning the entire tale out of whole cloth; I suspect he got expelled from community college for cheating and then went on to a career in the fast food industry, but maybe not: another hellish version involves him being the scion of a wealthy family having inherited effortless wealth and then pissing it all away in the casinos.
Whatever the truth may be we'll likely never know, and really, WGAS?
This clown provides valuable entertainment during these covid-ridden times, and that's worth something.
I graduated from a top law school, and went to an even higher tier undergrad (I'd say the name, one of the top universities in the country, but then you'd know too much about me), but, so what? In California one may challenge the bar without even GOING to law school. Ask Kim Kardashian, she's currently trying.
The thing about law school is that they don't teach us a whole lot specific about what we end up doing. I assume you became proficient at family law through years of practice, not through the one course in community property you took in law school. And they certainly don't have a class in law schools teaching about where students will or will not be able to take the bar, or what it might take to appear pro hac vice, other than in passing. At least I never saw such a class offered, did you? Maybe because I went to an accredited school, but still, it was never anything I even thought about.
It could be perhaps because you're older than I am, and or maybe because no one ever taught you how to write clearly, but you try too hard at times to sound erudite, my friend. You're incomprehensible at times - not on the level of Garnaby, but still. That's old school with all the "Wheretofores" the "and/or"s the "Now comes" and such. They stopped teaching that sort of thing thirty years ago I think, at least at any of the good law schools.
Its funny, he was attempting to Dox people. Then when people said something about Doxxing him he started spouting off how he was going to sue. Then someone came along and schooled him on some points an attorney should have known. Very telling.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Somewhere, many years ago, I read that there are no attorneys in Canada, and, that an attorney in the States is defined as a lawyer with a client.
I found the first part of these distinctions, but, not the second on line.
Quote:
Common law lawyers in Canada are formally and properly called "barristers and solicitors", but should not be referred to as "attorneys", since that term has a different meaning in Canadian usage, being a person appointed under a power of attorney.