See Special Play #13 here for the discussion about QQQ and three to the royal: http://alanbestbuys.com/id194.html
Printable View
See Special Play #13 here for the discussion about QQQ and three to the royal: http://alanbestbuys.com/id194.html
Personally, I don't find Rob's sub-optimal deviations as the problem. People do sup-optimal shit every day. It's his insistence that he has somehow solved the game of video poker better than people who know the math inside-out, and the idea that his personal anecdotal experience is somehow a substitute for mathematical analysis. That stuff is in the realm of claiming to have super powers, and is the modus operandi of most folks who claim paranormal abilities. Rob seems aware of his arguments' absurdities and shortcomings, however, as he never actually presents any tally of hands played or royals hit or ratios or anything that would make it obvious he's claiming stuff that's highly unlikely. He sticks with the anecdotal, kind of like Smilin' Bob with Enzyte. No data, no proof, just a big smile, a lot of implying, and words of wisdom aplenty for the non-believers.
No matter how you say it or in how many words you keep putting it red, you keep falling short of whatever mark you're shooting for. ...and with quite the ramble this time.
You seem to want to believe that AP's don't ever need to provide proof of their "win claims" because "university math professors" would do it for them if they were summoned. Now do tell--is there any more anecdotal evidence than that? One statement serves all....blanket coverage, feel-good/self-confidence building assertion. You name it. Except it excludes one giant admission: I'm one of those "math people" you wet-dream about, with actual degrees unlike most or all of the self-made AP clowns who troll the forums, and I didn't win as an "AP". So when I explain how I've consistently won thru the years with an alternative method, instead of trying to understand it or actually trying it, you claim those sacred "math people" would denounce it because they don't get it.
Do you as yet see the irony in your mythology? And please....stop with the corny responses. For those of us who know how to write, it's awkward watching you struggle with words as you try to construct something clever.
If you're a "math person", Rob, why don't you show us the math behind your strategy?
What will happen?
A) Rob makes fun of me or other APs for no reason.
B) Rob pretends to present some sort of math. IE: "I won $100k/year for 10 years. 100,000x10 = $1M."
C) Tries to explain his strategy and you gotta put yourself into more positions to let luck help you win big.
D) No response from Rob.
E) All of the above.Quote:
Originally Posted by RS__
Rob, feel free to dislike what I write as much as you want. It's a free country. Hell, I don't like half of what I write. But you really should learn to read a little bit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
I never mentioned "APs" at all. Not once. What the hell are you talking about? Math professors aren't APs. You do realize that, don't you? Maybe not. Let's get that straight, shall we? People with doctorates in math aren't all APs. Almost none of them are.
Learn to read, my friend. It's one thing to be math deficient. It's another to struggle to read.