coach belly are you an advantage player.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Rob Singer's negative expectation plays weren't so negative. He played games well above 99% with cashback/bounceback. Triple Bonus Poker Plus is a 99.8% game. Sure, he said he could beat the lower paybacks but he never played them.

---

Perhaps, but there's a thing called correct strategy that goes along with that payback :)

---

Yep, but Rob did play optimal strategy except for those "special plays" which will definitely cut some of the payback. But even with the special plays it wasn't chopping that much off. Much of the stuff he did, according to him, was conditional. Would the hit put him at or above his stop win was his rule for whether or not he made a lot of those special plays.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Rob Singer's negative expectation plays weren't so negative. He played games well above 99% with cashback/bounceback. Triple Bonus Poker Plus is a 99.8% game. Sure, he said he could beat the lower paybacks but he never played them.

---

Perhaps, but there's a thing called correct strategy that goes along with that payback :)

---

The 9 inch pedestal Man Servant put Rob up on trumps that. :)

---

Per the usual you insult yourself. You just can't be taken as a serious AP. You are definitely a Poser Pro. MAXPEN THE POSER PRO. You don't understand AP, you just do the monkey see monkey do thing while standing around acting like you know what the fuck is going on. You give blowjobs to AP's so they will point out plays to you.

Anyone with any brains can see that playing a 99.8% game with cashback/bounceback, which in those days was damn good, is not a losing scenario even with "special plays" in the mix. But not MAXPEN THE POSER PRO. You can't even be honest about it. You've got it in your head that everything written about Singer must be negative without any concern for the truth.

Its really sad how you've turned out. Your Singer obsession has destroyed your reputation. And you've exposed yourself as a poser pro.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Anyone with any brains can see that playing a 99.8% game with cashback/bounceback, which in those days was damn good, is not a losing scenario even with "special plays" in the mix. But not MAXPEN THE POSER PRO. You can't even be honest about it. You've got it in your head that everything written about Singer must be negative without any concern for the truth.

Its really sad how you've turned out. Your Singer obsession has destroyed your reputation. And you've exposed yourself as a poser pro.

---

You have turned into such a liar Mickeycrimm in your effort to support Singer. For years Rob attacked players for doing what you just described, playing slightly -Ev games and using the mailers, bounce back cash and point multiplier to turn the play +EV. He said he didn't need the players club/players card to win and anyone who did was weak. It came across that he didn't even understand the advantage of player club. He claimed he won without even using a players card. Now in defense of him, you say the opposite. Dementia is either setting in or you are flat out intentionally lying. It is you trying to rewrite history, reality and facts and everyone knows it.

I know, you will call me names now, just like you do everyone else, because that is all you have now.

And by the way, YES Rob often bragged about playing and winning on 98% games. Again, you are lying and trying to re-write history.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Perhaps, but there's a thing called correct strategy that goes along with that payback :)

---

The 9 inch pedestal Man Servant put Rob up on trumps that. :)

---

Per the usual you insult yourself. You just can't be taken as a serious AP. You are definitely a Poser Pro. MAXPEN THE POSER PRO. You don't understand AP, you just do the monkey see monkey do thing while standing around acting like you know what the fuck is going on. You give blowjobs to AP's so they will point out plays to you.

Anyone with any brains can see that playing a 99.8% game with cashback/bounceback, which in those days was damn good, is not a losing scenario even with "special plays" in the mix. But not MAXPEN THE POSER PRO. You can't even be honest about it. You've got it in your head that everything written about Singer must be negative without any concern for the truth.

Its really sad how you've turned out. Your Singer obsession has destroyed your reputation. And you've exposed yourself as a poser pro.

---

Well,,, since I am monkey doing stuff that I have yet to see or run into anyone doing. I will live with being called an amateur. Especially by a dumb ass hobo nickel scrounging vulture like yourself. Have fun jerking yourself off to delusions of grandeur in your rented room during retirement. Or did you upgrade to a rented apartment?...lol
The only one destroying their reputation is you. Which Crimm should people believe regarding Singer, the vitriolic drunk hobo or the knob polishing Man Servant?

You are the one obsessed with Singer. I hardly bring him up. I sent his ass packing. Something you couldn't accomplish in a decade. He is gone. Because he knows that he is completely full of shit. Pretty sure you're now bitter as fuck that you cucked out to him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Anyone with any brains can see that playing a 99.8% game with cashback/bounceback, which in those days was damn good, is not a losing scenario even with "special plays" in the mix. But not MAXPEN THE POSER PRO. You can't even be honest about it. You've got it in your head that everything written about Singer must be negative without any concern for the truth.

Its really sad how you've turned out. Your Singer obsession has destroyed your reputation. And you've exposed yourself as a poser pro.

---

You have turned into such a liar Mickeycrimm in your effort to support Singer. For years Rob attacked players for doing what you just described, playing slightly -Ev games and using the mailers, bounce back cash and point multiplier to turn the play +EV. He said he didn't need the players club/players card to win and anyone who did was weak. It came across that he didn't even understand the advantage of player club. He claimed he won without even using a players card. Now in defense of him, you say the opposite. Dementia is either setting in or you are flat out intentionally lying. It is you trying to rewrite history, reality and facts and everyone knows it.

I know, you will call me names now, just like you do everyone else, because that is all you have now.

And by the way, YES Rob often bragged about playing and winning on 98% games. Again, you are lying and trying to re-write history.

---

In fact, one of the points I made quite a few times was that a "Singer" type profile (impulsive, martingale, big bankroll, erratic play volume) would benefit people with comps and free play. "Singer," however, berated people for counting such things formally in their analyses of what to play where. I halfway agreed with him since free play and comps could be pulled out from under a player at any time. Sports book players, for example, sometimes had their banked comps radically reduced or zeroed out after ownership changes.

I have debunked "Singer" a long time and do not recall him ever mentioning comps or free play as part of any equation to turn a negative game positive. I honestly don't remember him posting anything like that even once.

But mickey has had private conversations with "Singer," so perhaps "Singer" said things to mickey that contradict the posts or the videos.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Anyone with any brains can see that playing a 99.8% game with cashback/bounceback, which in those days was damn good, is not a losing scenario even with "special plays" in the mix. But not MAXPEN THE POSER PRO. You can't even be honest about it. You've got it in your head that everything written about Singer must be negative without any concern for the truth.

Its really sad how you've turned out. Your Singer obsession has destroyed your reputation. And you've exposed yourself as a poser pro.

---

You have turned into such a liar Mickeycrimm in your effort to support Singer. For years Rob attacked players for doing what you just described, playing slightly -Ev games and using the mailers, bounce back cash and point multiplier to turn the play +EV. He said he didn't need the players club/players card to win and anyone who did was weak. It came across that he didn't even understand the advantage of player club. He claimed he won without even using a players card. Now in defense of him, you say the opposite. Dementia is either setting in or you are flat out intentionally lying. It is you trying to rewrite history, reality and facts and everyone knows it.

I know, you will call me names now, just like you do everyone else, because that is all you have now.

And by the way, YES Rob often bragged about playing and winning on 98% games. Again, you are lying and trying to re-write history.

---

You're as bad as maxpen the poser pro, KJocchio You are a BORN a liar. You don't care about the truth. You only care about bashing Singer. You get your jollies off doing it. Facts go out the window with you as long as what you write is anti-Singer. You have no scruples with the truth. The truth should not be anti-Singer or pro-Singer. YOU CAN'T DO IT. It's why your opinions on the matter are shit.

Yes, Singer denounced cashback/comp/freeplay. But do you think he passed it by? Let the casino keep it? If you do you are a bigger idiot than I thought.

You really need to get help. You are obviously mentally disturbed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

The 9 inch pedestal Man Servant put Rob up on trumps that. :)

---

Per the usual you insult yourself. You just can't be taken as a serious AP. You are definitely a Poser Pro. MAXPEN THE POSER PRO. You don't understand AP, you just do the monkey see monkey do thing while standing around acting like you know what the fuck is going on. You give blowjobs to AP's so they will point out plays to you.

Anyone with any brains can see that playing a 99.8% game with cashback/bounceback, which in those days was damn good, is not a losing scenario even with "special plays" in the mix. But not MAXPEN THE POSER PRO. You can't even be honest about it. You've got it in your head that everything written about Singer must be negative without any concern for the truth.

Its really sad how you've turned out. Your Singer obsession has destroyed your reputation. And you've exposed yourself as a poser pro.

---

Well,,, since I am monkey doing stuff that I have yet to see or run into anyone doing. I will live with being called an amateur. Especially by a dumb ass hobo nickel scrounging vulture like yourself. Have fun jerking yourself off to delusions of grandeur in your rented room during retirement. Or did you upgrade to a rented apartment?...lol
The only one destroying their reputation is you. Which Crimm should people believe regarding Singer, the vitriolic drunk hobo or the knob polishing Man Servant?

You are the one obsessed with Singer. I hardly bring him up. I sent his ass packing. Something you couldn't accomplish in a decade. He is gone. Because he knows that he is completely full of shit. Pretty sure you're now bitter as fuck that you cucked out to him.

---

I definitely hit a nerve, didn't I? maxpen the poser pro has never contributed anything meaningful on VCT. NEVER. He hangs around like he's some sort of AP. Do you recall him adding anything of value in a discussion about a play? He's here to leech off others. Whats extremely funny is his delusions of grandeur has him thinking he has ruined Singer. It's just the opposite. maxpen the poser pro ruined himself here. He showed his lowlife true colors. No redeeming qualities.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Anyone with any brains can see that playing a 99.8% game with cashback/bounceback, which in those days was damn good, is not a losing scenario even with "special plays" in the mix. But not MAXPEN THE POSER PRO. You can't even be honest about it. You've got it in your head that everything written about Singer must be negative without any concern for the truth.

Its really sad how you've turned out. Your Singer obsession has destroyed your reputation. And you've exposed yourself as a poser pro.

---

You have turned into such a liar Mickeycrimm in your effort to support Singer. For years Rob attacked players for doing what you just described, playing slightly -Ev games and using the mailers, bounce back cash and point multiplier to turn the play +EV. He said he didn't need the players club/players card to win and anyone who did was weak. It came across that he didn't even understand the advantage of player club. He claimed he won without even using a players card. Now in defense of him, you say the opposite. Dementia is either setting in or you are flat out intentionally lying. It is you trying to rewrite history, reality and facts and everyone knows it.

I know, you will call me names now, just like you do everyone else, because that is all you have now.

And by the way, YES Rob often bragged about playing and winning on 98% games. Again, you are lying and trying to re-write history.

---

In fact, one of the points I made quite a few times was that a "Singer" type profile (impulsive, martingale, big bankroll, erratic play volume) would benefit people with comps and free play. "Singer," however, berated people for counting such things formally in their analyses of what to play where. I halfway agreed with him since free play and comps could be pulled out from under a player at any time. Sports book players, for example, sometimes had their banked comps radically reduced or zeroed out after ownership changes.

I have debunked "Singer" a long time and do not recall him ever mentioning comps or free play as part of any equation to turn a negative game positive. I honestly don't remember him posting anything like that even once.

But mickey has had private conversations with "Singer," so perhaps "Singer" said things to mickey that contradict the posts or the videos.

---

And now for the third of The Three Stooges. I already took care of KJocchio and maxpen the poser pro. You have selective memory, comrade. Singer wrote many a story of taking comps/cashback/bounceback/freeplay over the years. Sure he denounced it but he didn't pass it up. He made a lot of brags about casinos sending him a shit ton of freeplay and room comp. You idiot Three Stooges even bashed him for frequently "dragging his wife" to those free casino vacations.

The only thing you have debunked is your knowledge on the subject.

All opinions on any subject should be unbiased. One must have a neutral perspective in evaluating anything. Its the only way to attain any kind of credibility. Not one of the Three Stooges can give an unbiased opinion on Singer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

You have turned into such a liar Mickeycrimm in your effort to support Singer. For years Rob attacked players for doing what you just described, playing slightly -Ev games and using the mailers, bounce back cash and point multiplier to turn the play +EV. He said he didn't need the players club/players card to win and anyone who did was weak. It came across that he didn't even understand the advantage of player club. He claimed he won without even using a players card. Now in defense of him, you say the opposite. Dementia is either setting in or you are flat out intentionally lying. It is you trying to rewrite history, reality and facts and everyone knows it.

I know, you will call me names now, just like you do everyone else, because that is all you have now.

And by the way, YES Rob often bragged about playing and winning on 98% games. Again, you are lying and trying to re-write history.

---

In fact, one of the points I made quite a few times was that a "Singer" type profile (impulsive, martingale, big bankroll, erratic play volume) would benefit people with comps and free play. "Singer," however, berated people for counting such things formally in their analyses of what to play where. I halfway agreed with him since free play and comps could be pulled out from under a player at any time. Sports book players, for example, sometimes had their banked comps radically reduced or zeroed out after ownership changes.

I have debunked "Singer" a long time and do not recall him ever mentioning comps or free play as part of any equation to turn a negative game positive. I honestly don't remember him posting anything like that even once.

But mickey has had private conversations with "Singer," so perhaps "Singer" said things to mickey that contradict the posts or the videos.

---

And now for the third of The Three Stooges. I already took care of KJocchio and maxpen the poser pro. You have selective memory, comrade. Singer wrote many a story of taking comps/cashback/bounceback/freeplay over the years. Sure he denounced it but he didn't pass it up. He made a lot of brags about casinos sending him a shit ton of freeplay and room comp. You idiot Three Stooges even bashed him for frequently "dragging his wife" to those free casino vacations.

The only thing you have debunked is your knowledge on the subject.

All opinions on any subject should be unbiased. One must have a neutral perspective in evaluating anything. Its the only way to attain any kind of credibility. Not one of the Three Stooges can give an unbiased opinion on Singer.

---

You know, mickey, my post was gentle. Had not a single bad thing to say about you or "Singer." And this was your response.

"Singer" never used bounce back, comps, free vacations, or free play as part of any accounting to turn negative into positive games. He stated that he felt it was inappropriate, that it was sleazy, addiction-serving bookkeeping, and that people who did it were "weak" and looking for excuses. Why do you not take him at his word?

Why do you feel it appropriate to do something "Singer" publicly said was NOT appropriate in determining wins/losses?

What you are doing is publicly cherry-picking "Singer's" own words and his own strategies and using your knowledge and YOUR accounting (not "Singer's") to do accounting for him. Why didn't you include "Singer's" own quotes or own words as a basis for your argument?

Do you think "Singer" needs your accounting help? Why do you think that?

I just don't get it. For 20 years, "Singer" lambasted video poker players for slowly changing their accounting practices from straight wins/losses to including free play to including comps to including when they sold gifts and Tupperware they received from casinos.

I am biased here. I applauded "Singer" on many occasions -- a rarity -- for taking this stand. I thought "Singer's" "don't-count-junk" bookkeeping was a good idea. It didn't muddy waters because bounce-back could be cut any time, even after play losses, and comps/free play have never been locked up as if in a bank. And the Tupperware is crap.

Your taking this position says that you get to decide what should count as profit from "Singer's" play even though he expressly posted on dozens, if not hundreds, of occasions that he considered what you are doing wrong.

You are basically DEFENDING SINGER FROM HIMSELF.

I don't get it. Well, maybe I do, if you rely on this kind of bookkeeping yourself to sustain the narrative that you are profitable. Or if you are dead set to define "Singer" as an "AP" because that makes everything with him fine and dandy.

Just realize that you are expressly defending "Singer" by doing something he said was WRONG dozens if not hundreds of times. Why do that?

I don't understand why you think your accounting practices should override "Singer's" accounting practices. I'm reasonably certain "Singer" didn't keep tabs on free rooms and meal values to arrive at his bottom line. Why do you value your accounting over his?

Ignoring someone's own words to decide how they should do their bookkeeping is the very soul of bias. You value your opinion over his.


P.S. For the record, when I do my own video poker accounting, I add in free play value after the fact of having played it so I have an objective, not a theo, number. I count nothing else into my formal bookkeeping. I never count room or food values for anything. When I was betting sports in LV more than offshore, I received 20-some nights comped a year. That's down to about a dozen now. I am a very small, modest vp player. I play maybe 50 hours a year. I'm ahead roughly 6K lifetime.

redietz wrote:

"I'm reasonably certain "Singer" didn't keep tabs on free rooms and meal values to arrive at his bottom line."





Reasonably certain, bull crap, sounds like speculation to me.

What other AP's calculations methods used to get to a final tally, was not the way Singer wanted to be looked upon as being in the same boat publically. That is Singer only being Singer every time. However, you can bet your ass that he passed up on nothing, and that was just one of his many secrets.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

You really need to get help. You are obviously mentally disturbed.

---

I can assure you the feeling is quite mutual mickeycrimm. Your insane switch regarding Singer and you now distorting and re-writing history to suit your new boyfriend demonstrates a clear detachment from reality. And you obsession with gay sex acts is not normal either. It goes well beyond the juvenile name calling that kids do, which you use as an excuse. It really reveals who you are...insecure closet door and everything.

What should be concerning to you is these opinions are shared by most here. And the same about MaxPen. Your opinions about MaxPen are shared by only you and a couple of the AP haters like blackhole. Everyone else, everyone normal knows Maxpen is a top AP. If blackhole shared my opinion about anything.....I think I would be very concerned. ;)

I believe Mickey's backing of Singer, is a combination of unwillingness to admit that he's wrong(extreme stubbornness) and his extreme hatred for Max, KJ and Comrade Dietz. Mickey is just to sharp in the AP department, to actually truly believe all of Singers nonsense and his continual defense of grandpa Newell. There are hundreds of posts of Mickey over a span of several years disproving and calling Singer a charlatan. He ultimately refuses to admit that he's wrong about the whole ordeal.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

And now for the third of The Three Stooges. I already took care of KJocchio and maxpen the poser pro.

---

You took care of nobody, you old fool. All you have done is prove yourself, a once greatly respected and still somewhat respected AP, as delusional and obsessive in everything else. YOU and you alone are are making yourself irrelevant. You are a has been, old dude, running over peoples toes with your wheelchair and laughing. Shades of "get of my lawn sonny".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozzy

I believe Mickey's backing of Singer, is a combination of unwillingness to admit that he's wrong(extreme stubbornness) and his extreme hatred for Max, KJ and Comrade Dietz. Mickey is just to sharp in the AP department, to actually truly believe all of Singers nonsense and his continual defense of grandpa Newell. There are hundreds of posts of Mickey over a span of several years disproving and calling Singer a charlatan. He ultimately refuses to admit that he's wrong about the whole ordeal.

---

That is basically it. Mickey can't and won't admit what everyone knows....that he was wrong...that he was played by Singer.

That is tied to Mickey being a "trumper" which he tells us every chance he gets and inserts politics and Trump into every discussion. If in fact the hobo can read, he no doubt has read Trumps book and has extracted Trumps number 1 rule....never apologize or admit your were wrong. That rule was really about business and business dealings an negotiations. In real everyday life not admitting you were wrong when the whole world can see and knows you were just makes you look like an idiot, completely delusional. Being wrong is not a weakness. Circumstances change and successful people change along with them and alter their views and opinion with those changes. Idiots just hang on to their initial wrong stances like earth-is-flaters.

Seems to me, Mickey got hornswaggled like Alan did years ago. But as I recall, Mickey more or less just stated that he doesn't care whether Rob is a liar or not. I think he's shitting on you guys because you all keep arguing the same shit over and over. Alan got so wrapped up in Singers BS that he went out of his way to make videos of the BS'er. How anyone gets so suckered by these BS artists is incomprehensible.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozzy

I believe Mickey's backing of Singer, is a combination of unwillingness to admit that he's wrong(extreme stubbornness) and his extreme hatred for Max, KJ and Comrade Dietz.

---

Ozzy, you are completely off base here. Mickey is not backing Singer and he is not wrong he is right. I also do not believe that he hates anyone on the site.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozzy

Mickey is just to sharp in the AP department, to actually truly believe all of Singers nonsense and his continual defense of grandpa Newell. There are hundreds of posts of Mickey over a span of several years disproving and calling Singer a charlatan. He ultimately refuses to admit that he's wrong about the whole ordeal.

---

Again mickey is not defending Singer, nor does it mean that mickey believes Singer's story. All of that has nothing to do with what took place.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BoSox

redietz wrote:

"I'm reasonably certain "Singer" didn't keep tabs on free rooms and meal values to arrive at his bottom line."





Reasonably certain, bull crap, sounds like speculation to me.

What other AP's calculations methods used to get to a final tally, was not the way Singer wanted to be looked upon as being in the same boat publically. That is Singer only being Singer every time. However, you can bet your ass that he passed up on nothing, and that was just one of his many secrets.

---

Just wanted to mention that I'm a bit of a language precisionist, so most of what I say is usually laced with qualifiers as opposed to declarations (as this sentence is), so almost everything has a degree of speculation to it.

My opinion/speculation/me-being-reasonably-certain (as opposed to being certain or someone else being reasonably certain) is that if Singer at any point had amassed mass quantities of comps to which he had attached a value, it would have taken a herculean effort by him to not mention it at some point with a dollar figure attached. His Newell obsession and using price tags adjectivally in reference to the Newell (as my mom did with home decor in my youth -- "the $600 sofa" or the "$40 lamp") allows me to come to my speculative conclusion that had he kept tabs on his freebies, at some point in thousands of posts, he would have attached some kind of price tag to it or boasted about it or mentioned it in some concrete way.

Perhaps I'm wrong and "Singer" displayed the same discipline in not mentioning his comp values as he has in keeping silent about the double up bug or stifling his opinions of blacks, asians, and gays.

I could be wrong, but I doubt it.

And allow me to point out that in this kind of discussion, given BoSox's newbie status regarding all things "Singer," that BoSox's speculations regarding "Singer" are most likely (note the qualifier) more speculative than mine, to coin a phrase from Animal Farm.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BoSox

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozzy

I believe Mickey's backing of Singer, is a combination of unwillingness to admit that he's wrong(extreme stubbornness) and his extreme hatred for Max, KJ and Comrade Dietz.

---

Ozzy, you are completely off base here. Mickey is not backing Singer and he is not wrong he is right. I also do not believe that he hates anyone on the site.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ozzy

Mickey is just to sharp in the AP department, to actually truly believe all of Singers nonsense and his continual defense of grandpa Newell. There are hundreds of posts of Mickey over a span of several years disproving and calling Singer a charlatan. He ultimately refuses to admit that he's wrong about the whole ordeal.

---

Again mickey is not defending Singer, nor does it mean that mickey believes Singer's story. All of that has nothing to do with what took place.

---

You sir, might be able to analyze a blackjack table, but you are HORRENDOUS at reading the forums and people in general.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

You really need to get help. You are obviously mentally disturbed.

---

Everyone else, everyone normal knows Maxpen is a top AP. If blackhole shared my opinion about anything.....I think I would be very concerned. ;)

---

What the hell does MaxPen being a top AP have to do with anything relevant to this dispute? Why did you even put that in your post? Right about now Blackhole's opinion stands up strong compared to yours. Yes, you think that MaxPen is a fine upstanding guy because he has done and thrown a few crumbs of what he has. Something that you chicken shit have been holding on to for who knows how long now and been sitting on the sidelines. All because you think it could possibly be doxing, and maybe breaking forum rules, or against the rules of where you obtained the information, etc, etc. That's okay you got good old Max to hopefully do all your dirty work. And you think your opinion is better than blackhole's yah right.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BoSox

What the hell does Maxpen being a top AP have to do with anything relevant to this dispute? Why did you even put that in your post?

---

My comments were a direct response to mickey's comments in post #47. Some have suggested YOU have a reading comprehension issue BoSox. I hate to say, it really is looking more and more like that is the case. You read what you want to read.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BoSox

Right about now Blackhole's opinion stands up strong compared to yours.

---

And this says everything about your ability to judge people lately.