Printable View
Yea, you're just confused. Given the things Rob says, I would not think it would be a question worth asking. But fair enough, maybe I jumped the gun picking on you. My apologies.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
LOL...not likely, but which post do you mean?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Anyway, I replied to a comment that you posted, which I assumed was quoting tewlj.
But what's the real reason your panties got all twisted?
Rob wouldn't be the first parent, living with their adult children, that I'm aware of.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
And many of the parents in that situation, that I know, are doing it to help their kids out.
Of course not.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyRob wouldn't be the first parent, living with their adult children, that I'm aware of.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
And many of the parents in that situation, that I know, are doing it to help their kids out.
Many reasons people live with their kids but more often than not it is due to limited resources. Now maybe his kids need a babysitter but usually it is the other way around.
If Rob had the money he would have bought a house in her area years ago or his kid(s) would be living with him. Thats what most middle middle class parents do in these situations.
Living in your kids yard in an RV or whatever does not suggest a very successful person with hidden assets. Yea, hidden away in his imagination. ;)
The "helping the kids out" is often a way to save face.
Whatever. I'm just saying. I'm not particularly successful but I have a very comfortable life. I do not judge people for being broke. Sharing households is likely a benefit for everyone involved. I would not be surprised if I go back to it at some point in my life.
In what situations? What do you imagine Rob's situation to be?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
You really don't know what you're talking about, do you?
You seem preoccupied with what's "normal" and what "most people do"...as if those opinions of yours should or would matter or apply to any individual scenario, other than your own.
I like the idea of living with my grandchildren, I expect to be able to provide housing to my adult children someday so that can happen.
If you even have any children or grandchildren, and want to see them as often as possible, then you go move into the house down the street, or wherever is far enough away for you to be comfortable.
Maybe you'll find comfort in doing what you think most people do.
I think parents and children living together is becoming more and more normal. If nothing else but for the simple reason that a lot of parents don't even want their kids to move out now. It's a different world.
Talk about preoccupied. lol the lack of self-awareness.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyIn what situations? What do you imagine Rob's situation to be?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
You really don't know what you're talking about, do you?
You seem preoccupied with what's "normal" and what "most people do"...as if those opinions of yours should or would matter or apply to any individual scenario, other than your own.
I like the idea of living with my grandchildren, I expect to be able to provide housing to my adult children someday so that can happen.
If you even have any children or grandchildren, and want to see them as often as possible, then you go move into the house down the street, or wherever is far enough away for you to be comfortable.
Maybe you'll find comfort in doing what you think most people do.
You now want to rehash what I think about Rob in detail?
I only speak to my own experiences so yes I do know what I'm talking about. Maybe the work ethic of those around you was really low so you see the default of homeless parents helping out kids? I guess thats what they must tell you... lol
I know lots of kids moving in with their parents but thats because the huge change in opportunities between the generations. I'm trying to think of someone who moved to their child's frontyard to help them but I'm coming up with a blank outside of Rob. That is not a joke either. Fuck, that is true even if we count parents whose children let them move in.
Anyway, please wait around Rob so he can take you to your kid's house in his Newell and drop you off to help them. ;) You are clearly on top of things.
There are large differences between 30-40 year olds and younger. Inflation in housing has made it far more attractive. Personally, I have nothing against the idea if it makes sense to everyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by jdog
Wonder what is the reason Rob gives for not having the properties in his name? Outside of face saving excuses? Rob's situation is far different.
He should have bought a house with another bedroom for them. ;)
Really, counsellor?Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
"Documented>"
As in "proof?"
Show it or STFU about it; your continuous yapping and nipping at KJ's heels, while comical, is tiresome.
What, haven't you any clients to fleece?
KJ, you can take off, I'll stick around and clean up this cesspool...and let me tell you that heads will roll.
Certainly financial reasons always make sense. But today more what I'm seeing is people want to be their kid's buddy more than they want to be their parent.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
This originally started when Kewl called it Rob's retirement plan. For some reason this triggered coach belly.Quote:
Originally Posted by jdogCertainly financial reasons always make sense. But today more what I'm seeing is people want to be their kid's buddy more than they want to be their parent.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
It should be clear why that was a good insult vs the situations that have been discussed. But it is coach belly so you get what you pay for.
Those are interesting questions.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenThat’s a very interesting answer.Quote:
Originally Posted by GarnabbyGive up the strict, concept of one versus the other. The same as a point isn't really, in theory, or actually, in practice, such a point, say, of determinism.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
Each, and every, dimension, as its own subset of physics/math, in a true dimensional equation, springs naturally from the absolute, which is all/no dimension(s). The first step, to form a point, say, like (levels of) infinitely compact/expansive "donuts" with their insides from the no-dimensional part, and, their outsides from the all-dimensional part.
Then, even though the set of dimensions that represent "determinism" (0 to 4, of charge as relative) is lower than the set of that represent "free will" (4 to 8, of gravity as quantum), with the latter set seemingly, but not, simply based on the former set, they are already related, by the "starting point" as the absolute as above.
I used to say that to combine the concepts of science, and, religion, I had to start from the science side of things. Here, I may say that I started from the deterministic side, with that language to express the rest, as a form of determinism that looks like free will. But, to truly get this to work, I now go with the above explanation. After all, those points above are required to make things work, not, some amorphous "foam", or "membrane", for space, and time, etc.
How do you see the interaction between the dimensions of determinism and free will in practical terms? For instance, how might this framework explain everyday decision-making?
What implications does this framework have for understanding consciousness and agency? Does it suggest new ways of thinking about the nature of mind and action?
Currently, my time is short, and, so, I have elected to to respond, in kind, when time permits.
Pics or it didn't happen where you're both gay.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
You embrace the idea of adult children moving in with their parents, if the kids need help, but reject the idea of parents moving in with their adult children, if the kids need help?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
As if the parents' benevolence or desperation is determined by the name on the deed?
And it devolved when you presented tales of your blue-color upbringing, and your cultivated foundational prejudice.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Who said I "rejected" it and what do you even mean?Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyYou embrace the idea of adult children moving in with their parents, if the kids need help, but reject the idea of parents moving in with their adult children, if the kids need help?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
As if the parents' benevolence or desperation is determined by the name on the deed?
All I know it was a justified and worthy clown on Rob.
lol "preoccupied" coming from coach belly.
KJ did Mdawg really stick it in "the end"?, not that there is anything wrong with it. In fact, you two should let Rob Singer join you on only fans, so your lemon party can get him a Newell.
Would you please post hard evidence that Rob ever lived in his kids driveway? Please, no conjecture, speculation, wives tales or bullshit. Just hard evidence. Real evidence. And nothing but real evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I've never said I have proof or evidence. I just assume it is true and don't care enough otherwise. It makes no difference to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmWould you please post hard evidence that Rob ever lived in his kids driveway? Please, no conjecture, speculation, wives tales or bullshit. Just hard evidence. Real evidence. And nothing but real evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionTalk about preoccupied. lol the lack of self-awareness.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
You now want to rehash what I think about Rob in detail?
I only speak to my own experiences so yes I do know what I'm talking about. Maybe the work ethic of those around you was really low so you see the default of homeless parents helping out kids? I guess thats what they must tell you... lol
I know lots of kids moving in with their parents but thats because the huge change in opportunities between the generations. I'm trying to think of someone who moved to their child's frontyard to help them but I'm coming up with a blank outside of Rob. That is not a joke either. Fuck, that is true even if we count parents whose children let them move in.
Anyway, please wait around Rob so he can take you to your kid's house in his Newell and drop you off to help them. ;) You are clearly on top of things.
I just mentioned that Kewl calling Rob's situation his "retirement plan" was solid. I've given Rob similar kudos. "Nervous poodle" for one.
Funny how you guys stick up for Rob when he says things far nastier about kewl which are just as founded/unfounded. He is super-nasty, which is fine, but he's a big boy and doesn't need you and coach belly looking out for him.
Ultimately though I know this -
Rob claims to have one or more sports cars. He claimed to have a Newell and even went to a dealership to pose for pictures trying to play it off as his own. I used to think he wasn't sincere in his attempt at convincing but I no longer believe that to be the case.
Yet he can't post pictures of a car he owns? Why would that be? He comes up with pictures of fake 100s in a safe yet he can't post any pictures of his cars which he seems to be just as proud of?
You tell me.
Yep, times have changed. In the 90's, a 25 year old STILL living with his Parents was considered a Loser. Cut to 2024 and a 25 year old STILL living with his Parents is considered normal.
This tells me you continue to be threatened, envious of, and obsessed with the fact that we had and lived in a Newell for over 5 years. And that's because you believe it but don't want to. But in your continuing discomfort over it, at least try to be more precise. Neither coach nor you can "catch a ride in it" these days. Had you paid attention, you'd have caught that we sold it several years ago. Psst....notice I said "WE". That's how men describe themselves when life, love, and meaning hasn't passed them by. Losers wouldn't have a clue though.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionokey dokes. You believe what Rob says and apparently a lot of the other nonsense on here. Thats on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyWhy assume that the parents live with the adult children because they are broke?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Even when Rob explained his circumstances, among many that are possible, you seem too confused to consider reasonable scenarios beyond what your prejudice can accommodate.
Maybe you're autistic, and that's why you don't get it.
Your parents obviously didn't save enough money to root you out of their home.
Are you capable of extending that kindness to your own children, and grandchildren?
Maybe if you ask nicely, you can catch a ride in his Newell.