Confusion is normal, and, so, temporary, but, ignorance, especially as bliss, is eternal. "A person who does not know about a problem does not worry about it." Furthermore, "What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so."
A further bit of philosophical sleight of hand is that what will happen, will happen whether feared, or not. However, a logical framework that tends to shape the events, themselves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
In the spirit of the above, mull this over...
"Is That So?"
The Zen master Hakuin was praised by his neighbors as one living a pure life.
A beautiful Japanese girl whose parents owned a food store lived near him. Suddenly, without any warning, her parents discovered she was with child.
This made her parents very angry. She would not confess who the man was, but after much harassment at last named Hakuin.
In great anger the parents went to the master. "Is that so?" was all he would say.
After the child was born it was brought to Hakuin. By this time he had lost his reputation, which did not trouble him, but he took very good care of the child. He obtained milk from his neighbors and everything else the little one needed.
A year later the girl-mother could stand it no longer. She told her parents the truth - that the real father of the child was a young man who worked in the fishmarket.
The mother and father of the girl at once went to Hakuin to ask his forgiveness, to apologize at length, and to get the child back again.
Hakuin was willing. In yielding the child, all he said was: "Is that so?"
Sounds like an interesting guy. Apparently, he was more proactive, and practical, about it.Quote:
Hakuin's early extreme exertions affected his health, and at one point in his young life he fell ill for almost two years, experiencing what would now probably be classified as a nervous breakdown by Western medicine. He called it Zen sickness, and sought the advice of a Taoist cave dwelling hermit named Hakuyu, who prescribed a visualization and breathing practice which eventually relieved his symptoms. From this point on, Hakuin put a great deal of importance on physical strength and health in his Zen practice, and studying Hakuin-style Zen required a great deal of stamina. Hakuin often spoke of strengthening the body by concentrating the spirit, and followed this advice himself. Well into his seventies, he claimed to have more physical strength than he had at age thirty, being able to sit in zazen meditation or chant sutras for an entire day without fatigue. The practices Hakuin learned from Hakuyu are still passed down within the Rinzai school.
And, a good segue into another break. A couple of cases coming up. Nice not to have rush with preparation. But, until my return, if anyone is interested in the science stuff, insofar as the numerology approach to the fine structure, here are a couple of pdf's. I had to make the first one an attachment because the link wouldn't load.
The attachment has a neat little segue into my own thus discovery. Last week, I wondered about the best mathematical approximation to date for the electromagnetic fine-structure constant. I found the information, fairly quickly, and, so, didn't have to ask on one of the physics forums. My approximation is already about at least one digit better, and, is based on something far simpler, yet intimately related to fine-structure physics, itself. I mean, right off the bat, with my first, but accidental, attempt at it. What were the odds? And, that formula has a particular elegance to it as do mine, in a way by working with only the integer values of the fine-structure constants separately. 29 turns out to be one of the gravitational thus numerals, so, I'm not sure how relevant it will be to the 137. But, these files, and other thus attempts by likely thousands of others, are very light on the gematria/mysticism. Like Zen, there's so much more to it.
https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-ja...1401011321.pdfQuote:
It is impossible to give an account here of all of the proposed formulas for alpha that have appeared in the literature. Some recent formulas are discussed by Gilson (1997), which presents his own formula, which is probably to date the most accurate formula and it is calculated from a model of atomic physics and relativity. This formula is difficult to interpret, however, and the numbers n1 = 137 and n2 = 29 have to be selected as the best input into the formula alpha inverted = ([29cos(pi/137)*tan(pi/29/137)]/pi)^-1} where n1 and n2 are integers.
Oh, here's another. Some of the information may be repeated.
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1009/1009.1711.pdf
Today, 12:29 PM #163
Gottlob1
Gottlob1 is online now
Silver
Gottlob1's Avatar
Join Date
Jul 2023
Posts
87 ----------> 87 = (1 + 2)*29 ---> 1229, same as the post-time. With 163 = (192 - 29) ---> 19229.
Gotta say Garnabby, I'm impressed: you actually seem to understand and enjoy working in the fields of physics and higher level math.
Me, I declare "Victory" after balancing my checkbook, and I did well on my math SAT: gotta wonder how different my life would have turned out had I pursued a career in science or math instead of law?
We are in part defined by the choices we make.
Yeah, V, thanks. I think that it's important to strive for something more. Not for the good times, but, to carry on through the bad.
Perhaps the gambling crowd, with its supposed "pot of gold at the end of rainbow" outlook about everything forgets that gambling per se, however, isn't the something more. As betrayed by their expectation to be accepted at face value, without explanation, and, even emulated, but, at the same time, turning a cold shoulder to what/whoever else.
Oh, I forgot to note, particularly for that wonderful soul, A=0 IQ, with Singer up even his ass, that the entire gambling "movement" has more or less collapsed. Wonder why. Ha. All that awaits now is death.
Gottlob1 Gottlob1 is online now
Silver
Gottlob1's AvatarJoin Date
Jul 2023
Posts
89
Fixed Your Post...Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fw3L4sn1mww
Yeah, Monet, thanks. But, another two weeks of "life getting the way" before I post a mock-up solution to the fine structure, as a gateway to the remainder of a working theory of everything. Working in the sense of no complex, or complicated math, or physics. To demonstrate the importance of first principles remaining as final principles, given especially no true mind along with no true matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetFixed Your Post...Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
https://youtu.be/Y3p_RL30efM
Ask me what tiny nuts ?Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfWhere have you been? I was talking about Max. Just Ask Mdawg and SV.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVReally?Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Garnabby was in the slammer and it involved gambling?
Do tell ...
For the last 20 plus years so many of have been on my monster nuts it’s pathetic. How many millions have I created for the community by accident ? It has to be north of 100 million in value. Then again none of you nit wits really know where the info comes from anyway. Now with all the spoon feeding people do online the market is saturated with a migrant workers. At least Crimm can actually figure shit out on his own.
Loyal to the game no clout chasers need apply. When a casino needs to taken down the real ones know who to call. The guy willing to live in bum fuck no where for 6 months to take down a 7 figure score to prove a point:
Let Zscore know I’m coming for his “team” lol soon that Pompous pric. Or maybe it’s already done ? I promise I’m your huckleberry Z
EG
Although UNKewLyingJ has cooled on this forum ever since his hero Dan the Man Druff called him out for lying and declared him lacking in credibility, over at GF.com he remains in a death struggle with everyone still trying to claim that he only lies about some things (not everything). This, after declaring repeatedly that he will never post at GF.com again. :rolleyes:
Still whining in a high pitched voice about how he lies "only to protect himself" but is silent on trying to explain how lying daily for months about a lawsuit involving his fictionalized backrooming incident somehow "protected" him? How, UNKewlJ, how? How does lying, then retracting the lies so that you're back at square one protect anything?
If he'd only make the small step of admitting that he lies only to try to back up his stories, he'd make a little progress towards believability. But he can't come clean in any way, because that is the nature of compulsive lying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
The hypocrisy of this person, Mdawg, who lied daily for 7 straight months, claiming wins totaling half a million dollars only to later declare "he was about even over that period", who now has the nerve to be jumping up and down here yelling "he lied for 3 months". And no one says a thing. kettle, pot black....anyone?
I haven't "cooled" on this forum because of anything Dan Druff said. Christ, I admitted that I had made up the lawsuit part of the incident before Dan Druff ever said a word, so that has nothing to do with any reduced posting here on my part. The fact is this just isn't a forum about sharing gambling experiences and learning from other while they share their experiences. It just isn't. It is more like the third grade playground and "your mother wears army boots" mentality.
If I am not going to share my experiences and I definitely am not going forward, then there is simply no reason for me to participate much here. And that goes for Gambling Forums as well. In addition to Mdawg and Singer, at GF there is blackhole, the only person banned from here for trolling. Moses was banned for threats and singer for 6 months for racial slurs, but blackhole is the only person banned from WoV and here for trolling. And I am wasting time engaging with these people?
So you continue to do what you need to do to make you feel better, Mdawg. But just know that while no one is calling you out for it, there is not a single person on this forum, that doesn't KNOW that an already multi-millioniare, who claims to have won even more multi-millions of dollars from gambling, mostly voodoo and nonsensical claims and stories, obsessing over a mid-level advantage players, makes as much sense, as selling a 600k RV, sight unseen to an Israeli oversea. But again, do what you gotta do, to think you have won something...some internet forum troll war I guess.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgEver since UNKewLyingJ was outed as a compulsive liar, he's given up on trying to retain any credibility, other than with weak repetitive "Woe is Me" and "There must be something wrong with anyone who comes after me for lying" nonsense. This upward shift in the level of UNKewlJ deviousness is why for some time now he's been using sock puppets without later admitting that they were his. As far as the lying, his pattern since the beginning has been to deny. Finally recently he was caught dead to rights and admitted that series of ongoing lies he made for a few months.
I doubt he will ever deviate from this pattern of continuing lying, admitting only if cornered.
No one here is saying anything we don't already know, and the bottom line remains, as MaxPen has said, You can't get to the truth with a fraud, but when some of us keep after UNKewLyingJ the same way he has kept after his nonstop Lying at Length, he cries wolf, after having bit off more than he could chew.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
The main reason I keep up with the pressure on this high pitched whiner, is as an exercise in analysis of his persona. You have to admit, besides being fun and games, it's fascinating to encounter such a lost soul who tries so hard to stick to the same lying script, and doesn't give up even after repeated failures to convince people of whatever it is he's trying to convince people of. Yes there are a lot of liars out there, but one who keeps at it, pretending (or maybe even believing?) that he's making headway, is more rare.
https://i.imgur.com/lckS3wYh.jpg
You say a lot of nonsense that shows that you're incapable of saying much of anything and sticking to it, but that's the nature of a compulsive liar. You say that you will no longer post at this or that forum. Recently you declared that you would no longer post anything more in the way of any experience and simply continue trolling. You also posted that you would never address MDawg or RobSinger again.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
In all cases within a matter of days or hours you couldn't stick to your resolve and came back sputtering great volumes of nonsense.
I can imagine your whiny indecisive self at the tables, putting your hand up to your cheek, "I just don't KNOW if I should hit or stay? Should I up the bet with a few more red chips or not? I'm soo lost." which is why it's been documented that you're low end video poker all the way, you created this blackjack persona to try to seem like a man about town, instead of an indecisive whiner.
https://www.gamblingforums.com/threa...22#post-124869
UnKewLyingJ, why don't you send some more whiny messages to people begging them to get bad ol' MDawg off your case. Obviously you can't fight your own battles.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
It is noon, on a Monday, a business day, and this supposedly high priced lawyer has spent his day trolling on the internet. :confused: What does that tell you about who this guy is and how insecure he is.
THAT makes about as much sense as claiming to spread $100-$5000 playing double deck blackjack on the Las Vegas strip for 10 straight hours and winning 60K, while no one cares that would cost them their jobs. :cool:
How are things at the "mid 7 figure dollar" Las Vegas mansion you claimed to have purchased? :cool:
Tell us some more about Las Vegas basically comping and allowing a player to live 4 years in high end suites while he wins millions of dollars. :cool:
Pick up any hookers over the weekend, Mdawg? Hope it didn't cost you an arm and a leg....or the watch off that arm. :cool:
Meanwhile, I played the Las Vegas strip this weekend. Won one night. Lost another. Because THAT is how gambling and blackjack play REALLY works. You don't win 50 sessions in a row. You don't play 10 straight hours and win 60K. You don't spread 1-50 and have the very people that would lose their jobs not care.
Your gambling claims are bullshit Mdawg. It is as bullshit as 18 y.o. in a row, no offense to the late Alan Mendelson or his son who posts here.
I understand why you are so freaking angry that I dared say, your bullshit is not how things work. I understand that you are "giddy" with what you think this moment gives you.
It does nothing to change any of the facts stated above.
It does nothing to change you are a bullshitter much like and I think inspired by Rob Singers bullshit claims.
It does nothing to change that this isn't even your first go around. You have done this all before, at WoV using a previous handle.
It does nothing to change the fact that you are life long losing player, hell bent on writing some kind of fiction story otherwise.
So troll away, just another lifelong losing player who is apparently angry about that.
Just quote a few old posts, and UnkewLyingJ comes off the handles with a 10x multiplier response. :cool:
UNKewl definitely been on tilt nonstop all week! with thousand word as Rob Singer calls them, long-winded, rambling drama-laced "I NEED TO set the record straight or I'll go OUT OF MY MIND!" paragraphs that never seem to satisfy, as he then repeats the same things over and over again.
Again...Kettle meet pot. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Don hypocrites like this NOT recognize that they are hypocrites? :confused: Or do they just not care.
After all these years UnKewJ has neither improved his lying, nor learned how to copy / paste.
That is because I am NOT a professional troll like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Whatever this "adventure of" nonsense is/was, writing a fiction story or screenplay or whatever, you posted the exact same posts at 4 websites a on a daily basis. And come to find out yesterday there is a 5th that I am not familiar with. THAT right THERE, tells all anyone need know about whatever this agenda is, dude!
"Pope of Las Vegas". :rolleyes::D
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgWhat UNKewlyingJ does is study up on any topic at hand and then come back with what he read or heard. He's been doing this for years with his blackjack "story," tried the same with the lawsuit lie, and with anything else he has talked about. No real firsthand experience at anything - he also whines and pouts about how he thinks comps should work in Vegas, when he's never rated for better than a free hot dog.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Mdawg and Singer like to make these comments about me having a whiney voice. Neither has ever heard my voice. No one on this forum has. So it is just another case of them making shit up out of thin air. I don't have a whiney voice, nor act effeminate. I like sports, not musicals or shopping. Nor do I even like that kind of gay person. I broke up with a BF because he was too effeminate for me. So these two repeating this lie is just another case of two very insecure, homophobic assholes.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
As for being indecisive at the tables. Several years ago, I switched over to card counters basic strategy, so I don't have to make many decisions at the table. They are already made. The benefit of CCBS far outweighs the tiny cost of playing some marginally "incorrect" hands at minimum bet. AND you eliminate one of the bigger tells of a card counter.
Now prior to that, a little indecision at the table is great cover. If Mdawg was a real winning player he would have learned and understood that. Take a hand like 16 vs dealer 10. One of the most common hands. Playing basic strategy and the normal index plays a player will be standing and hitting at different times. And because 16 vs 10 is such a common hand, that is easy for dealer and pit to see. It is a fairly big tell. So if a player acts indecisive and even says something "every time I hit this I lose" it is effective cover rather than just hitting at 0 and negative counts and standing on plus counts which becomes VERY obvious very quickly.
Exactly how much cover that buys, is debatable. There is an argument that the Eye in the sky doesn't hear anything said, so that is lost on them. BUT most evaluations requests come from the floor....the pit. So if that cover buys you anything at all, even a little bit of time, you can be out the door when playing shorter sessions, rather than going through an evaluation.
THAT is the basis of how longevity is achieved. But I wouldn't expect a guy that claims he plays double deck for 10 straight hours spreading 1-50 to have any idea about how real card counting and longevity works. :cool:
As The Stomach Turns....
Kew, realize no one cares what you say anymore, now that they have had it proven to them that you just cannot post without lying.
And I love EVERY minute of your being tortured by your own stupidity. :)
Really? That is all you got? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
People say you were a great troll. I guess that too is a distant memory that you soon won't even recall.
What UNKewlJ will never understand is that when we drop a few words that both make our point and send him into, it is by design and results in his spiraling out of control. https://i.imgur.com/zzZXBMC.gifHis Abbey Normal brain starts short circuiting with confusing spirochetes of fear, envy, resentment that drive him to the keyboard where he types thousand word essays 10x multiplier responses trying desperately to make his point, not realizing that he isn't just putting on a circus show, he IS the circus. As Monet said long ago,
You are too serious.
You lie too much.
You don't get the jokes.
You are the Joke!
and then we just sit back and skim through his UNKewl nonsense, with at best amusement, but more often, pity, and never any trust.
What's hilarious is the guy that UNKewLyingJ was hoping would back up his blackjack play verified that he's seen KJ only in what anyone could call sugar daddy situations, and playing extremely low level in what could only be a cover for his hustling.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Cracks me up how Singer and Mdawg are at the exact same place, using the exact same play book.
For years both tried to be taken seriously with their ridiculous claims. Singer to the point that he self published or paid to publish a book. Mdawg writing his tales simultaneously at 5 different forums. Both telling tales that just don't work. Not mathematically. Not the way the gambling industry works.
And at the end of it all, here is what they both have left: I have won a troll war. I "made" you respond to this or to that. It is a quazi- admission that everything they have said and claimed for years was BS, but it was all to somehow entice me to respond to their trolling games. It is a version of "made you look, made you look".
Big whoop.
In the end, tales of Newell RVs and 1.5 million dollar jackpots, and 3 million won from double up bug, and winning progression systems, and 1200 comped suites over 4 years while winning millions, and $100-$5000 spreads playing double deck blackjack for 10 hours, and 50 straight winning blackjack sessions in a row, and 100 out of 104 winning sessions and mid 7 figure dollar mansions, have all come crashing down and they are left with "made you look"..... I got you......I out trolled you.
Congrats to you both.
At the end of the day:
Singer is still a life-long losing system player type gambler, living off his retirement, I suspect more of that retirement money due to his wife than himself.
Mdawg is a somewhat wealthy guy, although there is some indication not nearly as wealthy as he claims, who likes to gamble, can afford to gamble. Loses. And is comped accordingly.
And I am still a mid-level advantage player/card counter, making a moderate living in Las Vegas.
Nothing has changed with all these "made you look, made you look" trolling games.
And in the end it is still what people say about their gambling experiences that matters. Cut through all the trolling and other fluff.
What has Singer said: "special plays", machines telepathing hot and cold cycles. Complete gambling voodoo folklore.
How about Mdawg: He talked about Betting into hot streaks. 50 winning sessions in a row. he talked about being able to win because he has a bigger bankroll to put more money in play. As if that somehow changes -EV to +EV. :D
These guys are basing their nonsensical claims on not decades old, but centuries old voodoo gambling concepts.
Contrast that with me. Everything I talk about in relation to my blackjack play is based on sound blackjack and mathematical principals. The math works....with everything I do! Just as it does with real AP's and winning players. Math!!
Gambling is math. Most of you guys are APs and know gambling is math. Singer and Mdawg don't seem to have a clue and have spent years claiming winning by "special plays" and "betting into hot streaks". It is no surprise that in the real world, if you look through OSN, you don't find either of these two. :rolleyes: But in the storytelling hall of fame, they would be front and center.
The final similarity between these two is while they have no mathematical principals that even in some small way would account for their claims, they both want people to think there is some movie-like James Bond mystic about them that allows them to win, defying the math. There isn't!! That is just fantasy nonsense. Hollywood, make believe.
Hopefully Singer's run is coming to an end because he is now old as shit. Mdawg if you try this game again with a new (3rd) identity, a peice of advise. At least pick something that the math works. You aren't going to scam a forum or community with APs and math knowledgeable people with gambling voodoo nonsense like "betting into hot streaks" or Singer's "special plays" (special LESS optimal plays by the way).
All that’s been established is that UNKewlJ is a compulsive liar
which also means thatMeantime,Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
Correct me fellow circus fans, but the image I'm getting, is of someone who has nothing to lose so he just keeps spouting the same nonsense even after a complete multi-forum beatdown and loss of credibility, such that what Gottlob said, really does make more sense than ever.
I wish our founder had stuck around just a little while longer to have seen his words come blazingly true as UNKewLyingJ was so utterly outed..Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
I have to hand it to Alan, he nailed it there. Maybe he deserved more credit than I gave him.
Well if Bill Yung said something then it must be true. It is case closed. The guy is the modern day Sybil with multiple personalities, sometimes logged in at the same time, talking to himself.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Mdude, seriously.... the people you align yourself with and quote, Singer, Blackhole, the other crazy as dude over at GF PunkCity, who has never even been to America nor Las Vegas but has opinions on gambling in Vegas. You seem to think there is credibility in numbers.
It is like watching someone in prison saying well all these other prisoners think I am innocent or think this or that. Really? That is who your aligning yourself with? It is like watching Mr Trump, say that Kim-Jung-un and Putin and President Xi and all the other dictators don't see anything wrong with anything he has done.
You are a crazy man Mdude. I knew your claims of winning were nonsense almost immediately, but one of the most astonishing things that happened throughout this ordeal, was to watch you align yourself with Singer.
Sort of ironic that KJ used to spout that he was going to outlive all of us "bitter old men", but, now he's the one with nowhere to go. Sort of like him griping to Dan that my prophecy, not so long ago, as Garnabby, of his death was an actual death threat against him. Ha. I guess that figuratively thus writing amounted to the same thing. KJ, the online blackjack personality guy, for well over a decade, who faked his own death, but only to figuratively bring it about for good.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgCorrect me fellow circus fans, but the image I'm getting, is of someone who has nothing to lose so he just keeps spouting the same nonsense even after a complete multi-forum beatdown and loss of credibility, such that what Gottlob said, really does make more sense than ever.
I wish our founder had stuck around just a little while longer to have seen his words come blazingly true as UNKewLyingJ was so utterly outed..Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Then, again, it might have been more of a self-fulfilling prophecy, by the Reaper, given KJ's innate proclivity to blindly follow through with just about any off-the-cuff thus direct suggestion. The same with my suggestion that if there were a brother he taught blackjack to, and brought on such forays, over the years, then where was the brother on the forums. By which, KJ, on his very next reply, wholeheartedly uttered that the brother used KJ's online account all along with KJ.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1Sort of ironic that KJ used to spout that he was going to outlive all of us "bitter old men", but, now he's the one with nowhere to go. Sort of like him griping to Dan that my prophecy, not so long ago, as Garnabby, of his death was an actual death threat against him. Ha. I guess that figuratively thus writing amounted to the same thing. KJ, the online blackjack personality guy, for well over a decade, who faked his own death, but only to figuratively bring it about for good.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgCorrect me fellow circus fans, but the image I'm getting, is of someone who has nothing to lose so he just keeps spouting the same nonsense even after a complete multi-forum beatdown and loss of credibility, such that what Gottlob said, really does make more sense than ever.
I wish our founder had stuck around just a little while longer to have seen his words come blazingly true as UNKewLyingJ was so utterly outed..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
There never was a brother or anyone else using his account. There's zero chance someone so wrapped up in these forums would allow that to happen.
Funny flailing again.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWell if Bill Yung said something then it must be true. It is case closed. The guy is the modern day Sybil with multiple personalities, sometimes logged in at the same time, talking to himself.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Mdude, seriously.... the people you align yourself with and quote, Singer, Blackhole, the other crazy as dude over at GF PunkCity, who has never even been to America nor Las Vegas but has opinions on gambling in Vegas. You seem to think there is credibility in numbers.
It is like watching someone in prison saying well all these other prisoners think I am innocent or think this or that. Really? That is who your aligning yourself with? It is like watching Mr Trump, say that Kim-Jung-un and Putin and President Xi and all the other dictators don't see anything wrong with anything he has done.
You are a crazy man Mdude. I knew your claims of winning were nonsense almost immediately, but one of the most astonishing things that happened throughout this ordeal, was to watch you align yourself with Singer.
Kew, wake up and smell the urine. EVERYBODY is aligned against you because everybody realizes that you've spent your life fraudulently lying to and constantly trying to deceive the masses.
You are the joke.
In sum, the guy obviously doesn't use his head much, or as Gottlob put it "Certainly of negligible intelligence" if he had something more going on upstairs he'd not have tossed out such easily disproved lies about a filed lawsuit and done enough research to not confuse terms like Plaintiff and Defendant even after supposedly signing some long settlement document that would have referenced him as Plaintiff in at least a dozen spots including right next to his signature. And then, giving us five different contradictory versions of how much he was getting in the settlement, claiming that word of the settlement approval was handed down on a court holiday, and that the settlement funds landed on a non-banking Saturday - these were just glaring imprecisions and holes in his story that someone with just a little more brains would have addressed better. A parting lie was his claim that he lied to "protect himself" - which made so little sense that he never even bothered to try to explain.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Looking back, he may have decided that a lawsuit was needed to back up his story when everyone even DanDruff pointed out that it didn't make much sense that the casino had simply handed over the video from the alleged incident before any suit was filed. Thinking fast (but not well) he figured the lawsuit would back up his story the same way his claim that the press had contacted him and his claim that known APs had heard of the incident, would bolster the lie.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
If you look at all of his stories, the only one that at least gibes with the information that is out there and in books, at least in theory, is his blackjack story, and that's because he was able to wear that fable smooth through years of use, but - you can't dispel first hand observation, and his story doesn't gibe with what you saw MaxPen the red to green play under cover of what looked like a sugar daddy.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
What's impressive is how little it takes to wind him up and get him to sit down manically at the keyboard re-typing everything he has ever had to say about anything and anyone, in almost every post, the - "I NEED TO set the record straight or I'll go OUT OF MY MIND!" long, tortured paragraphs.
Richard III is said to have offered his kingdom for a horse. UNKewlJ, I am sure, would be glad to give his god-damned soul for just a sympathetic listener.
Still, someone so desperate to be believed, the only reason he's never offered a shred of tangible proof for anything he has done or claimed must be that the corroborating evidence - does not exist. Given that the one time he tried to offer something that could be independently verified (the lawsuit) he fell flat, I doubt he will ever try to submit anything again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Most likely correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
kew is the biggest laughing stock on all forums combined. He's as much of a goof, as Chrissy/Kyle Prescott Mitchell :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerFunny flailing again.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWell if Bill Yung said something then it must be true. It is case closed. The guy is the modern day Sybil with multiple personalities, sometimes logged in at the same time, talking to himself.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Mdude, seriously.... the people you align yourself with and quote, Singer, Blackhole, the other crazy as dude over at GF PunkCity, who has never even been to America nor Las Vegas but has opinions on gambling in Vegas. You seem to think there is credibility in numbers.
It is like watching someone in prison saying well all these other prisoners think I am innocent or think this or that. Really? That is who your aligning yourself with? It is like watching Mr Trump, say that Kim-Jung-un and Putin and President Xi and all the other dictators don't see anything wrong with anything he has done.
You are a crazy man Mdude. I knew your claims of winning were nonsense almost immediately, but one of the most astonishing things that happened throughout this ordeal, was to watch you align yourself with Singer.
Kew, wake up and smell the urine. EVERYBODY is aligned against you because everybody realizes that you've spent your life fraudulently lying to and constantly trying to deceive the masses.
You are the joke.
I'm in the process now of pulling together five or six files of a fair number of notes. Probably about as many passes away from a first draft of the condensed version of my theory. Maybe, in a week. For now, I'm putting it in a Blogger blog. Primarily for unlimited editing. You'll require a fairly up-to-date device to work the links to the Wolfram, math site. But, you may want to hold off a bit until things start to firm up. Lots of formatting for the math, shifting things around, typos, and the like.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
At least, for me, it's a lot of fun, but, I still have to get my "beauty sleep". Ha. Oh, don't worry about either of the other, two blogs. One is completed, to do with gematria; the other isn't at all completed, but a mishmash of doodling that should tie in together well with the above, in other ways. It appears that the determination of the fine-structure constants, along with the other math/physics dimensionless constants, is more of a random access thing, in any order, than a sequential (generating function) thing.
https://garnabby.blogspot.com/2023/08/blog-post.html
will you be publishing, e.g. in NJP, seeking peer review for your theory of everything?
Of course, at some point, a bit further down the road. I knew what I would do first, even before I found it, but, I don't want to fowl it by saying, just yet.
As I re-work all of the numerals, together, on the end, I saw that I had to add a digit, in a particular way, to each of the initial sets of digits for the fine-structure constants. Had to use a different calculator, which took a couple of hours. The additional digits might have altered one set of results for the worse, but, they actually filled it out. It's hard to know, with some bits, that you're supposed to get half a, or the full, result. So much information fit into the numerals below.
Anyway, here are the final ones, all eight, which I want to secure with a timestamp. My write-up goes into how the numerals were arrived at, and, so, so, so much more, about how the numerals are to be parsed out. Should knock anyone's socks off. Ha.
137.03599915121266
142.73600104069440
89.266557295047035
62.712232460473931
197.66952228533632
214.02899610821660
29.970632587726477
10.679967924426944
Max. You can no more get the theory of everything out of me, than you can get me out of the theory of everything.
In other words, by becoming a bit of every one, as then everyone by nature, the thus voices (in one's head) are one's true (outer) voice. The only true identity. No?
https://youtu.be/MxGEVIvSFeY
Gottlob1
Gottlob1 is offline
Gottlob1's Avatar
Join Date
Jul 2023
Posts
137 ----------------> 137
Oh, here's a neat one, the first of the day. I put in the maximum number of Gottlob1's, twenty of them, for dear Max. Ha.
--->Quote:
Gottlob1Gottlob1Gottlob1Gottlob1Gottlob1Gottlob1Go ttlob1Gottlob1Gottlob1Gottlob1Gottlob1Gottlob1Gott lob1Gottlob1Gottlob1Gottlob1Gottlob1Gottlob1Gottlo b1Gottlob1
1111
11111
111111
11111111
111111111
1111111111
Bobobobobobobobobobobobobobobobobobobobo
Bobobobobobobobobobobobobobobobobobobo
Bobobobobobobobobobobobobobobobobobo
Bobobobobobobobobobobobobobobob
Bobobobobobobobobobobobobobobo
loooooooooooooooooooooooooooot
Bobobobobobobobobobobobobobo
Bobobobobobobobobobobobobo
Bobobobobobobobobobobobo
Bobobobobobobobobobobo
Bobobbobobobobobbo
Bobbobobobobobob
Bobobobobobobobo
Boboboobo Boobobo
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
BoBoBo-Bo-Bo-BoBo
BoBoBo-Bo-BoBoBo
BoBoBoBo BoBoBo
Bobobo-bo Bo-bobo
Bobobo-bobo-bobo
Bobobo Bobobobo
Bobobobobobobo
Bo-bo-bo-bo-bo-bo-bo
Bo bo bo bo bo bo bo
ggggggggggggg
LOLOLOLOLOLOL
TGTGGGTGTGGTG
BlogBlogBlog
https://anagram-solver.net/Gottlob1G...1?partial=true
The blogblogblog answer is in spot-34, which becomes spot-37 if fill in the 1, 11, and 111, at the top of the list. Interestingly, the word, bobo, several times, with the word, loot, in between.
Quote:
noun. bo·bo plural bobos. often disparaging. : a member of a social class of well-to-do professionals who espouse bohemian values and lead bourgeois lives.
Seems that Bo is another term for marijuana.Quote:
Bobo is a Filipino word that means smart or intelligent. It is really common to the Filipino people because they always say it.
Gottlob1 Gottlob1 is online now
Gold
Gottlob1's AvatarJoin Date
Jul 2023
Posts
138 ---------> 138 = (1 + 137) ---> 1/137
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qr1PFNRgOaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Yeah, that post of mine was an interesting sort of post, too. The anagram output lines contain all of the initial characters of my usernames, up to the Gottlob1 username. Even though the input line was formed of Gottlob1's, there was, still, no guarantee that all of those characters would come before the blogblogblog line.
As well that my previous post in this thread, post-134, pointed out the fine-structure constants, beginning with the 137-one. I mean, the prime, 137, is of the form, (4n +1), with n = 34, sort of like (4*34 + 1) ---> 43_41, or 41_43, which goes around 42 = 42*1 ---> 421, or 142. Moreover, 134 = (130 + 2^2) ---> 137 by rotating the 2, to 7.
If you can tell me more about anti-gravity, I'll gladly steal your idea(s) for my blog of it, etc. Thanks, in advance. Ha. Oh, getting into the gist of it now. But, the next four terms were quite a bit harder to figure.
P.S. We are the UFO's, in the sense that our species was the first such advanced one.
P.P.S. Interesting that my next anagram, too, had a reference to the Philippines. Sort of quite unlikely, I think.
https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post161490
Wow! I made the most of the afternoon, yesterday, by making the corrections to the ways that the calculations are done, but, again, which could have no effect on their results above. I already had a couple of the ways spot-on, so, it was a matter of jiggling the other six into a similarly consistent place. As thus puzzles go, not one of my hardest ones, but, definitely the most interesting, in terms of how all of it came together. The completed draft for now will be done after entering connective explanations, some other observations, and, a supplemental part about thus rewriting a couple of the other known, dimensionless mathematical/physics constants.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
In jest, I must have been napping, the first time around (which induces another well-known sleep brain-wave pattern, one favored by Einstein, for his imagination, for which, I guess, he received top-marks) but, thus number puzzles are best completed by working from the outside in, while from the middle out. The difference was that I had no doubt that it worked, as soon as I saw it starting to unfold, given especially their immediate numerological nature. The results above are based on mathematically consistent calculations in my blog, namely, by four simple equations (three of the equations are based on the other) that take seventeen-digit numerals repeated for x-values, and, so, any resultant mystical, numerological aspects couldn't have been dreamed of, let alone fudged. One of the thus interesting aspects of the results above is described below.
Firstly, the .0[3]5 part of the 137 numeral or result above. 0 flips across part way, either way, to form a 1; and the 5 flips across, either way, to form a 7 (inverted 2) as ᘔ. Put the 1, 3, and 7, together, for 137. Similarly, with the .7[3]6 part of the 142 numeral above. 7 rotates to 2, by ᘔ ---> ᘖ; and the 6 rotates to 9. Put the 2, 3, and 9, together, for 239 = (240 - 1) ---> 214, or 142. 137 goes with 142. Secondly, the .26 part of the 89 numeral. 26 reverses to 62, which leads to the 62 numeral above. Similarly, with the .71 part of the 62 numeral above. 71 = (80 - 9) ---> 89, which leads to the 89 numeral above. 89 goes with 62. To recap, the first two (three-digit) numerals of the first set, of four results above, involve flipping across, and rotating, respectively, and, a trivial mathematical rephrasing, with the second one involving reversal. The second two (two-digit) numerals of the first set of four results above involve neither flipping across, nor rotating, but, still a trivial bit of math, with, again, the second of the two numerals involving reversal.
The same sort and degree of thing occurs with the second set, of four results above, which form by the first thus set coming together. Firstly, the .669 part of the 197 numeral above. 669 = (700 - 31) ---> 137 = 1[√9]7 ---> 197, which leads to the 197 numeral above. Similarly, with the .028 part of the 214 numeral above. 28 = 2*14 ---> 214, which leads to the [/b]214[/b] numeral above. Secondly, the .97 part of the 29, and, then, similarly, with the .67 part of the 10, numerals work slightly differently because three digits, instead of only two digits, are flipped across, and rotated, with .0[3]5, and .7[3]6, respectively, each of which occurred about a 3, and, in the same way, respectively. For the .97 part, take the .9[70]6 part, and, for the .67 part, take the 10.[6]7 part, with the two parts swinging in opposite directions from the first two decimal places. Next, rotate the 7's, to 2's, by ᘔ ---> ᘖ, and, flip the 0, and 10, to arrive at .9216, and, 01.62. (0 flips across, by a quarter turn, to 1, and, the 0 as 10 flips across, by half a turn, to 01.) Note that [0 + (-1 + 6)*2] = 10, which leads to the 10 numeral above, and, that [9 + 2*(1 + 6)] = (9 + 14) = 23 = [2][√9] ---> 29, which leads to the 29 numeral above. Furthermore, note that each of the last two numerals above involve one thus digit flipped across, and, one thus digit rotated, in the sense that the initial, two numerals or results above came together to lose their thus purity in the last two numerals or results above. As well for the .9706 part having its thus morphable digits together, the 7, and 0, but, the 10.67 part having its thus morphable digits apart, the 10, and 7. Flipping across, or mirroring, digits is a "together operation", a minor change, but, rotating digits is an "apart operation", a major change. Additionally, that as 89 = [2^3][9] ---> 29, and, 62 = 1*62 ---> (-1 + 6)*2 = 10, then 137 = [1][√9][7] ---> 197, and, 142 = (2 + 100 + 40) ---> 214. It's one thing to intuitive "divine" that the numerals go together, in particular ways, with each other, but, quite another to have them appear by wholly legitimate, and independent, mathematically consistent calculations.
Regardless, I'm pretty much right on schedule as promised with the draft solution of the fine-structure constants. Ha. Incidentally, the sum of all of the eight results above is (137.03599915121266 + 142.73600104069440 + 89.266557295047035 + 62.712232460473931 + 197.66952228533632 + 214.02899610821660 + 29.970632587726477 + 10.679967924426944) = about 884.09990885313436798041499102881719. It means something pretty darn neat. Something to do with summarizing all of the results above into two different numerals. Namely, 911 for the problem, and, but, 411 for the solution. Go figure.Quote:
Einstein claimed that he needed 10 hours of sleep at night as well as his daytime naps to fuel that amazing brain of his. Just like Dali, he practiced micro-napping, which meant that he never allowed himself to drift into stage two of sleep.
Hey, it just occurred to me that the two 3's between the digits that either flipped across, or rotated, for the first two results above, went to the 6 between the 10, and 7, of 10.[6]7, of the last two results involved, given especially that a 3 can't go between the 7, and 0, of .9[70]6. Seems also that a 3 is relatively invariant under the flipping, and, rotating, operations, ie, a backward-3 results, either way. The 6 = (3 + 3) ---> 33. Ha.
Very interesting. Well, you will find out that just nothing goes wrong with the thus numerals. The various sorts and degrees of patterns very likely hold beyond any arbitrary number of decimal places.
Hey mr lob1, when gottlob2 makes his mind up, your time is also up.
Gottlob spamming this thread with his numerology nonsense is a perfect end to this thread, which will now be closed.
There is one kewlJ discussion thread I am letting stand, so everything can consolidate over there.