*I like watching smart guys talk about science and physics. makes me realize I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer*
Printable View
*I like watching smart guys talk about science and physics. makes me realize I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer*
I think that the chemical elements will become easier to synthesize, beyond some point, say, an initial significant "island of stability", but, still have to be synthesized.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
So what you are saying is the periodic table’s structure correlates naturally with field behavior, not coincidentally, but because of deeper field-based inversions or symmetry principles?Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
And you are looking for unification through field symmetry and structure
My method is like iterating matter and motion onto time and space until everybody is happy. Each iteration produces something different, except the final one, which was there, all along, as the mean or average of everything, in balance. Like going further out of the universe, only to end up where started as the way to manage infinitude.Quote:
AI Overview
Island of Stability - Discovering Superheavy Elements
The "island of stability" in nuclear physics refers to a theoretical region of superheavy elements that are predicted to have significantly longer half-lives than other known superheavy elements. Element 140, also known as unquadnilium, is a hypothetical element within the superactinide series and is a potential candidate for residing on this island. While element 140 itself isn't necessarily the "center" of the island, it could be part of the larger group of superheavy elements exhibiting enhanced stability due to "magic numbers" of protons and neutrons.
"Matter to motion, in time for space", would be my slogan. Ha.
Einstein developed a theory about space.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
And, boy, it was about time, too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhMh-aqrdtUQuote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
Better hold off, on the cymbals. It was, and, still is, only a theory, as in the Theory of Relativity. The reason that old Einstein never finished it, primarily because the, his equations became totally insoluble. We still don't know that it's true, or not, or whatever.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhMh-aqrdtUQuote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
You require the numerals to really, in theory, and, actually, in practice, prove something out. Ha.
Yes, Relativity is deeply successful, but not a complete theory of everything. It doesn't include quantum mechanics or explain dark matter, dark energy, or gravity at quantum scales.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFBetter hold off, on the cymbals. It was, and, still is, only a theory, as in the Theory of Relativity. The reason that old Einstein never finished it, primarily because the, his equations became totally insoluble. We still don't know that it's true, or not, or whatever.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhMh-aqrdtUQuote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
You require the numerals to really, in theory, and, actually, in practice, prove something out. Ha.
Awhile back I introduced a new theory of inertia but it doesn’t seem to be gaining momentum.
We watched a show on Amazon where it was posited that our universe is in fact contained within a black hole, which in turn is part of a different, parent universe.
Known as black hole cosmology or Schwarzschild cosmology, the theory proposes that the event horizon of a black hole could also be the boundary of our observable universe
Mind boggling.
I think that same theory also states that all the black holes in our universe have separate universes in them.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Mind boggling in one way, but in another way no more mind boggling then if our entire universe existed inside of a Rolex that was jammed up into a Las Vegas hooker’s cooch.
And then for every Rolex that was jammed up into a hooker’s cooch in our universe, another universe would exist inside of there.
A real mystery to me is "How could matter / energy/ the stuff or reality come into existence in the first place?"
Yes, I am aware of the Big Bang theory but it in turn begs the question.
Equally mind boggling, at least to me, is the concept of time / infinity: how could things have always existed?
Both are pretty easily explainable. Matter / energy / stuff or reality can come into existence from nonexistence quite easily since in a state of nonexistence there are no physical laws to prevent things from coming into existence out of nothing, so things coming into existence out of nothing are internally consistent in a state of nonexistence.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
How could things have always existed? There are only two possible states: existence or nonexistence. So for all of eternity either existence or nonexistence has occurred regardless of time. Since it’s already shown above how existence can arise from nonexistence then one state or the other having always existed is reasonable.
I've read a bit about this and to me it seems a bit of a reach: I mean, really?
POOF, something from nothing because there are no laws to prevent it?
How could chaos result in order?
As Einstein noted, cold is merely the removal of heat, ie, non-existence is merely nothing, not, some unexplainable quantity.
It seems you are arguing that it is not reasonable to ascribe a property of something from nothing because there are no laws to prevent it.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
But if that were correct then you would be committing the same error by ascribing a property to nothing of not being able to produce something, not because there are no laws to prevent it, but because there must be a law that would cause it, and yet nothing by definition would not have any laws!
I am trying to focus on the physical causation, the creation of "something," whether it be from "nothing" or from some other yet to be defined source.
Existence may ultimately be defined as being "absurd," whatever, I am off to Chinook Winds to gamble, i.e. to revel in the absurd.
Good luck!Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Remember that reality may be ultimately shaped by consciousness so if you really believe you are going to win, the universe may manifest it that way and make it so
I waited for the appropriate spot to insert "It" into the following, because of the lower-case m.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenGood luck!Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Remember that reality may be ultimately shaped by consciousness so if you really believe you are going to win, the universe may manifest it that way and make it so.
--->Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
List of churches that are Registered Historic Places in the United States. [First spot.]
Where There's Smoke (Superman: The Animated Series episode). [Last spot, #614.]
https://anagram-solver.net/I%20like%...r?partial=true
I like to think that the Universal Anagram Solver is more of a sum-over-histories calculator, in that time doesn't go ahead until its solutions can make sense. As with Pinball's vanishing 777-post, and, V's above as if to scream out for the "It". Can't say the number of times that there was no solution, but, then, the poster went back to edit something, and, voila, the solutions worked.
Not that long ago, at https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post165985 , old, defunct-user Tablepooey suggested that the solver must have something to do with backward causation.
Interestingly,
614
= [(3^5 + 2^5 + 2^5) + (3^5 + 2^5 + 2^5)]
= {[0^0 + 0.5^-(0^0)]^5 + 0.5^-5 + 0.5^-5} + {[0^0 + 0.5^-(0^0)]^5 + 0.5^-5 + 0.5^-5}
---> 0555_0555 in each of the bases, and, exponents.
https://youtu.be/S2DL2SD8IsM
So, I guess, unless V gets three flaming churches, on a slot machine, he's not going to be happy with his evening out. Ha.
MHF MHF is online now
Gold
MHF's AvatarJoin Date
Mar 2024
Posts
214
More interestingly,Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
614
= 2*307
---> 307_307,
which, too, comes with zeros.
So, there's that numeral 37, again. But what's its relation to 555?
37 = 555 / (5 + 5 + 5).
Gosh, I pulled the MHF avatar back out of the hat, at just the right time. Ha.
And, even more interestingly, sometimes 0^0 = 1, in the sense that 0 of itself can make 1, as in something out of nothing. But, if not, then when is 0^0 still 0?
Furthermore, how to get both plus, and minus, 1's out of 0? Is the zeroth root of 0 = +/- 1, as in something else out of nothing, but, which cancels back to nothing?
Is no order, disorder?
Reminds me of the claim that 2 / 0 = 2 because 2 divided no way is still 2. Or, is there only 1 way not to divide 2?
P.S. A link about the 0^0 = 1, or whatever, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_t...eir%20side.%22 .
For the zeroth root, there's https://math.stackexchange.com/quest...oth-root-exist .
MHF MHF is online now
Gold
MHF's AvatarJoin Date
Mar 2024
Posts
216 ----------> 216 = 6*6*6 ---> 666
And, 177 = 3*59 ---> 359 = (-11 + 370).
No order could mean:Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFMore interestingly,Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
614
= 2*307
---> 307_307,
which, too, comes with zeros.
So, there's that numeral 37, again. But what's its relation to 555?
37 = 555 / (5 + 5 + 5).
Gosh, I pulled the MHF avatar back out of the hat, at just the right time. Ha.
And, even more interestingly, sometimes 0^0 = 1, in the sense that 0 of itself can make 1, as in something out of nothing. But, if not, then when is 0^0 still 0?
Furthermore, how to get both plus, and minus, 1's out of 0? Is the zeroth root of 0 = +/- 1, as in something else out of nothing, but, which cancels back to nothing?
Is no order, disorder?
Reminds me of the claim that 2 / 0 = 2 because 2 divided no way is still 2. Or, is there only 1 way not to divide 2?
P.S. A link about the 0^0 = 1, or whatever, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_t...eir%20side.%22 .
For the zeroth root, there's https://math.stackexchange.com/quest...oth-root-exist .
MHF MHF is online now
Gold
MHF's AvatarJoin Date
Mar 2024
Posts
216 ----------> 216 = 6*6*6 ---> 666
And, 177 = 3*59 ---> 359 = (-11 + 370).
Absence of any structure (pure nothingness)
Or a neutral state, like before structure or entropy emerges
Disorder implies:
There was some order, and it became jumbled. Or that systems have randomness or entropy
So:
No order ≠ disorder, though they’re often lumped together.
No order = not yet any rules
Disorder = rules were broken or randomness took over
Think: a blank page (no order) vs a page with scribbles (disorder)
And besides disorder there is also datorder which is the udda order.
Yep.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
The opposite of order is disorder, the latter which is the same as not order.
And, the opposite of the these, as order versus disorder, is no order versus all orders.
No, as a word, goes with zero, but, not, as a word, goes with opposite.
Isn't neutrality a type of order, or definition?
Yes, neutrality can be a type of order.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFYep.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
The opposite of order is disorder, the latter which is the same as not order.
And, the opposite of the these, as order versus disorder, is no order versus all orders.
No, as a word, goes with zero, but, not, as a word, goes with opposite.
Isn't neutrality a type of order, or definition?
It implies balance, non-preference, or defined non-alignment.
Neutrality isn’t void or nothing—it’s a deliberate configuration.
So even a neutral “nothing” can be a kind of something—defined by the frame in which it exists.
https://youtu.be/JOiZP8FS5Ww?si=YuH_DCeBzup9QR8c
The give-away is that there are many types of neutrality, but, only one type of "no order", unless you want to fret over stuff like Complex zero being essentially different from Real zero.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFThe give-away is that there are many types of neutrality, but, only one type of "no order", unless you want to fret over stuff like Complex zero being essentially different from Real zero.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
And even that "one kind" of no order is slippery—because the moment we try to define it, we give it a boundary, and therefore a kind of structure.
Which was a very early thought in my own theory: I needed the theory to join it, but, had to join it to get the theory.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFThe give-away is that there are many types of neutrality, but, only one type of "no order", unless you want to fret over stuff like Complex zero being essentially different from Real zero.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
And even that "one kind" of no order is slippery—because the moment we try to define it, we give it a boundary, and therefore a kind of structure.
That reminds me of the story of the monk:Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFWhich was a very early thought in my own theory: I needed the theory to join it, but, had to join it to get the theory.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
And even that "one kind" of no order is slippery—because the moment we try to define it, we give it a boundary, and therefore a kind of structure.
A man is driving down the road and breaks down near a monastery. He goes to the monastery, knocks on the door, and says, My car broke down. Do you think I could stay the night? The monks graciously accept him, feed him dinner, even fix his car. As the man tries to fall asleep, he hears a very strange sound, the most beautiful and alluring sound he has ever heard.
The next morning, he asks the monks what the sound was, but they say, We can't tell you. You're not a monk.
The man is disappointed but thanks them anyway and goes about his merry way. Some years later, The same man breaks down in front of the same monastery. The monks again accept him, feed him, and again fix his car. That night, he hears the same strange sound that he had heard years earlier. The next morning, he asks what it is, but the monks reply, We can't tell you. You're not a monk.
The man says, All right, all right. I'm dying to know.
If the only way I can find out what that sound was is to become a monk, how do I become a monk?
The monks reply, You must travel the earth and tell us how many blades of grass there are and when you find that number, you will become a monk. The man sets about his task. Some 54 years later, he returns and knocks on the door of the monastery.
He says, I have traveled the earth and have found what you have asked for. There are 145,236,284,232 blades of grass, but I realized the earth is ever changing. New blades of grass are born and old blades of grass die.
The real number of blades of grass on the earth is unknowable. In fact the only true knowledge a man can have is his own limitations.
The monks reply, Congratulations. You are now a monk. We shall now show you the way to the sound.
The monks lead the man to a wooden door where the head monk says, The sound is right behind that door. The man reaches for the knob, but the door is locked.
He says, Real funny. May I have the key? The monks give him the key, and he opens the door. Behind the wooden door is another door made of stone.
The man demands the key to the stone door. The monks give him the key, and he opens it, only to find a door made of ruby. He demands another key from the monks, who provide it.
Behind that door is another door, this one made of sapphire, And so it went until the man had gone through doors of emerald, silver, topaz, and amethyst.
Finally, the monks say, This is the last key to the last door.
The man is relieved to know that he has finally reached to the end .
He unlocks the door, turns the knob, and behind that door he drops to his knees in astonishment as he sees the source of the sound.
But we can't tell you what it is because you're not a monk.
Holy, darn, that was one of my next thoughts: How to find such a theory, but, then, go on to relate to others? A theory which benefits only the one(s) who discover it.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenThat reminds me of the story of the monk:Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFWhich was a very early thought in my own theory: I needed the theory to join it, but, had to join it to get the theory.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
A man is driving down the road and breaks down near a monastery. He goes to the monastery, knocks on the door, and says, My car broke down. Do you think I could stay the night? The monks graciously accept him, feed him dinner, even fix his car. As the man tries to fall asleep, he hears a very strange sound, the most beautiful and alluring sound he has ever heard.
The next morning, he asks the monks what the sound was, but they say, We can't tell you. You're not a monk.
The man is disappointed but thanks them anyway and goes about his merry way. Some years later, The same man breaks down in front of the same monastery. The monks again accept him, feed him, and again fix his car. That night, he hears the same strange sound that he had heard years earlier. The next morning, he asks what it is, but the monks reply, We can't tell you. You're not a monk.
The man says, All right, all right. I'm dying to know.
If the only way I can find out what that sound was is to become a monk, how do I become a monk?
The monks reply, You must travel the earth and tell us how many blades of grass there are and when you find that number, you will become a monk. The man sets about his task. Some 54 years later, he returns and knocks on the door of the monastery.
He says, I have traveled the earth and have found what you have asked for. There are 145,236,284,232 blades of grass, but I realized the earth is ever changing. New blades of grass are born and old blades of grass die.
The real number of blades of grass on the earth is unknowable. In fact the only true knowledge a man can have is his own limitations.
The monks reply, Congratulations. You are now a monk. We shall now show you the way to the sound.
The monks lead the man to a wooden door where the head monk says, The sound is right behind that door. The man reaches for the knob, but the door is locked.
He says, Real funny. May I have the key? The monks give him the key, and he opens the door. Behind the wooden door is another door made of stone.
The man demands the key to the stone door. The monks give him the key, and he opens it, only to find a door made of ruby. He demands another key from the monks, who provide it.
Behind that door is another door, this one made of sapphire, And so it went until the man had gone through doors of emerald, silver, topaz, and amethyst.
Finally, the monks say, This is the last key to the last door.
The man is relieved to know that he has finally reached to the end .
He unlocks the door, turns the knob, and behind that door he drops to his knees in astonishment as he sees the source of the sound.
But we can't tell you what it is because you're not a monk.
A theory like this is found when you shift how you see, not what you see.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFHoly, darn, that was one of my next thoughts: How to find such a theory, but, then, go on to relate to others? A theory which benefits only the one(s) who discover it.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenThat reminds me of the story of the monk:Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
A man is driving down the road and breaks down near a monastery. He goes to the monastery, knocks on the door, and says, My car broke down. Do you think I could stay the night? The monks graciously accept him, feed him dinner, even fix his car. As the man tries to fall asleep, he hears a very strange sound, the most beautiful and alluring sound he has ever heard.
The next morning, he asks the monks what the sound was, but they say, We can't tell you. You're not a monk.
The man is disappointed but thanks them anyway and goes about his merry way. Some years later, The same man breaks down in front of the same monastery. The monks again accept him, feed him, and again fix his car. That night, he hears the same strange sound that he had heard years earlier. The next morning, he asks what it is, but the monks reply, We can't tell you. You're not a monk.
The man says, All right, all right. I'm dying to know.
If the only way I can find out what that sound was is to become a monk, how do I become a monk?
The monks reply, You must travel the earth and tell us how many blades of grass there are and when you find that number, you will become a monk. The man sets about his task. Some 54 years later, he returns and knocks on the door of the monastery.
He says, I have traveled the earth and have found what you have asked for. There are 145,236,284,232 blades of grass, but I realized the earth is ever changing. New blades of grass are born and old blades of grass die.
The real number of blades of grass on the earth is unknowable. In fact the only true knowledge a man can have is his own limitations.
The monks reply, Congratulations. You are now a monk. We shall now show you the way to the sound.
The monks lead the man to a wooden door where the head monk says, The sound is right behind that door. The man reaches for the knob, but the door is locked.
He says, Real funny. May I have the key? The monks give him the key, and he opens the door. Behind the wooden door is another door made of stone.
The man demands the key to the stone door. The monks give him the key, and he opens it, only to find a door made of ruby. He demands another key from the monks, who provide it.
Behind that door is another door, this one made of sapphire, And so it went until the man had gone through doors of emerald, silver, topaz, and amethyst.
Finally, the monks say, This is the last key to the last door.
The man is relieved to know that he has finally reached to the end .
He unlocks the door, turns the knob, and behind that door he drops to his knees in astonishment as he sees the source of the sound.
But we can't tell you what it is because you're not a monk.
Some truths "liberate the soul" but cannot be transmitted, only experienced.
They ignite when the mind is ready.
Your discussion touches upon Zen.
I like it.
______________________
Buddha's Zen
Buddha said: "I consider the positions of kings and rulers as that of dust motes. I observe treasures of gold and gems as so many bricks and pebbles. I look upon the finest silken robes as tattered rags. I see myriad worlds of the universe as small seeds of fruit, and the greatest lake in India as a drop of oil on my foot. I perceive the teachings of the world to be the illusion of magicians. I discern the highest conception of emancipation as a golden brocade in a dream, and view the holy path of the illuminated ones as flowers appearing in one's eyes. I see meditation as a pillar of a mountain, Nirvana as a nightmare of daytime. I look upon the judgment of right and wrong as the serpentine dance of a dragon, and the rise and fall of beliefs as but traces left by the four seasons."
Yes, V, a true theory of everything necessarily breathes life back into even long-dead philosophies. Ha.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Is, say, a giraffe, stupid, for not noticing us, or, are we truly stupid, for being certain that it should?
MHF MHF is online now
Gold
MHF's AvatarJoin Date
Mar 2024
Posts
222
“There is no path to happiness. Happiness is the path.” - BuddhaQuote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
"Many man swallow, but Fu Man Chu."
Ha. The Great Garnabby can also spit 'em back out.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
--->Quote:
Best to find happiness in sadness, joy in sorrow, laughter in tears, and, victory in defeat, for then you have become one with all things, thus venturing beyond the realm of illusions. Ha.
The Story of Doctor Dolittle, Being the History of His Peculiar Life at Home and Astonishing Adventures in Foreign Parts. [0th spot.]
You Are Awesome: Find Your Confidence and Dare to be Brilliant at (Almost) Anything. [Last, at the 616th spot.]
https://anagram-solver.net/besttofin...s?partial=true
Notice the giraffe ...
What a great follow-up post to my post #222 above.
https://youtu.be/_7VsoxT_FUYQuote:
Originally Posted by MHFYes, V, a true theory of everything necessarily breathes life back into even long-dead philosophies. Ha.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Is, say, a giraffe, stupid, for not noticing us, or, are we truly stupid, for being certain that it should?
MHF MHF is online now
Gold
MHF's AvatarJoin Date
Mar 2024
Posts
222
“Man with hole in pocket feel cocky all day.”Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
"He who goes to bed with sexual problem wakes up with solution in hand."
“Foolish man give wife grand piano. Wise man give wife upright organ.”Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
"Woman who slide down bannister bare-ass have no hair by cracky."
Oh, boy, it looks like the anagram solver continues to be updated with new solutions, and, mine above is already out of date. When using only the first thus solution, it tends to remain as it is because added solutions, to the anagram site, are unlikely to affect it. But, when going by the last thus solution, there are a lot of other solutions before it, which in turn makes it much more susceptible to one of the added solutions displacing it as the last solution. So, to recover the last thus solution, I had to make a slight change to the original anagram problem, in terms of putting a zero in for the o in one. I guess also to find zero in one. Hence the follow-up post of the follow-up post.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
--->Quote:
Best to find happiness in sadness, joy in sorrow, laughter in tears, and, victory in defeat, for then you have become 0ne with all things, thus venturing beyond the realm of illusions.
The Story of Doctor Dolittle, Being the History of His Peculiar Life at Home and Astonishing Adventures in Foreign Parts. [0th spot.]
You Are Awesome: Find Your Confidence and Dare to be Brilliant at (Almost) Anything. [Last, at the 616th spot.]
https://anagram-solver.net/besttofin...s?partial=true
Now I don't want to waste such an unusual post as this on only the above, and, so, I thought to add in another bit such as VCT life in QK death, with QK = Qwerty Keyboard.
--->Quote:
Best to find happiness in sadness, joy in sorrow, laughter in tears, VCT life in QK death, and, victory in defeat, for then you have become 0ne with all things, thus venturing beyond the realm of illusions.
United States Senate Education and Labor Subcommittee Investigating Violations of Free Speech and the Rights of Labor. [In spot, 2.]
The Story of Doctor Dolittle, Being the History of His Peculiar Life at Home and Astonishing Adventures in Foreign Parts. [In spot, 3.]
You might be a king or a little street sweeper, but sooner or later you dance with the reaper. [In second-last spot, 523.]
You might be a king or a little street sweeper, but sooner, or later you dance with the reaper. [In last spot, 524.]
https://anagram-solver.net/besttofin...s?partial=true
(523+524) =[-1 + (-1 + 500 + 5*5) + (-1 + 500 + 5*5)] ---> 1/(1/555 + 1/555) ---> 555_555, for the two reaper solutions.
And, notice that the first spot was an unrelated thus solution, which reminded me of my analysis of Pinball's faked last post #777, at https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post197696 , which has an unrelated thus solution in last spot, similar to the quantum decoherence or instability, of my first follow-up post. Interestingly, two spots up front, and two spots in behind, for the thus correct solutions, are involved in also my second follow-up post. And, it's nice to find the match for also this type of post.
Incidentally, as of a day or two ago, the number of blog views were:
Neat numerals, with a 555, 343 = 7*7*7 ---> 777, and, a 696 for 1961 .
MHF MHF is online now
Gold
MHF's AvatarJoin Date
Mar 2024
Posts
224
Sigh, but, 224 = (220 + 2^2) ---> 222, which is were I was trying to end up, anyway. Sort of like being where I didn't go. Ha.
Oh, boy, it looks like the anagram solver continues to continue to be updated with new solutions, that mine above is again out-of-date. When using only the first thus solution, it tends to remain as it is because added solutions, to the anagram site, are unlikely to affect it. But, when going by the last thus solution, there are a lot of other solutions before it, which in turn makes it much more susceptible to one of the added solutions displacing it as the last solution. So, to recover the last thus solution, I had to make a slight change to the original anagram problem, in terms of putting a zero in for the o in one. I guess also to find zero in one. And, next, to put in another 0 / 1 with another o, but with an l. Hence the follow-up post of the follow-up post of a follow-up post. Will the sheer fun and excitement of it all be continued by another thus post? How long will it take for the following to to no longer work?
--->Quote:
Best to find happiness in sadness, joy in sorrow, laughter in tears, and, victory in defeat, for then you have become 0ne with all things, thus venturing beyond the realm of i1lusi0ns.
The Story of Doctor Dolittle, Being the History of His Peculiar Life at Home and Astonishing Adventures in Foreign Parts. [1st spot.]
You Are Awesome: Find Your Confidence and Dare to be Brilliant at (Almost) Anything. [Last, at the 606th spot = {6 * [antilog(6^0)]^2 + 6} ---> 666]
https://anagram-solver.net/besttofin...s?partial=true
Pretty awesome how it's still thus working out, especially right on the very end. Ha.
P.S. When I have a bit more time, I will include the list from the last time, and, then, the list from this time, to see how the anagram solutions overall are changing.
MHF MHF is online now
Gold
MHF's AvatarJoin Date
Mar 2024
Posts
225
Firstly, the second version, with its complete list of solutions in tow in attachment #1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
Secondly, the third version, with its complete list of solutions in tow in attachment #2.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
Again, I wonder how long the first, and last, thus solutions will hold. But, if not, then can it be thus patched up again, by adding yet another set of 0 / 1 for an o, with an l, or i?
P.S. I thought to include the complete list for the expanded anagram, too, with the qwerty bit, from the first time around, which is still holding its shape, in case its first and/or last solutions disappear.
MHF MHF is online now
Gold
MHF's Avatar
Join Date
Mar 2024
Posts
226
Where did you go Garnabby?
For the last couple of weeks everyone’s been saying something like “Where did go Garnabby?”
Oh, and when it's not "You Are Awesome: Find Your Confidence and Dare to be Brilliant at (Almost) Anything", it reverts to "Web-based Augustana Student Survey Assessment of Information Literacy (WASSAIL). We'll just have to see what it does, the next time.
https://youtu.be/54e2ijSNJKs?list=RD54e2ijSNJKs
1140 ---> 411, and, 1275 ---> 7152, my old usernumeral at the long-gone(?) gematria forums.Quote:
The expression later became part of the drinking formula "wassail ... drinkhail" which, the OED suggests, initially arose in England among the Anglo-Danes, and from there spread to the native population, being considered a specifically Anglo Saxon characteristic by the 12th century. The earliest record is of around 1140, in Geoffrey of Monmouth's telling of the Rowena story, which has wes heil ... drinc heil (or, in a variant reading, was heil). Later Middle English manuscripts have a variety of spellings, including wæs hæil, wæshail, wessail, washayl, washail, wesseyl, wassayl, wassaile, wassaylle, wessayle, whatsaile and whatsaill.
The second expression, "drinkhail", may derive either from Old Norse or Old English, again with a variety of spellings including drinkel, drincheheil, drechehel, drincheheil, drinceseil, drinqueheil, drinkeil and dringail.
The earliest example of the drinking phrases in a specifically English context comes from a manuscript of 1275, preserving a 12th-century text which has Old English: Þat freond sæiðe to freonde...Leofue freond wæs hail Þe oðer sæið Drinc hail [That friend said to [the other] friend..., "beloved friend, wassail!"; the other said, "drinkhail!"]
And, 258 ---> 582, for "the Holy Ghost". Ha.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby
MHF MHF is online now
Gold
MHF's Avatar
Join Date
Mar 2024
Posts
227
What beats even trolling, by a New York mile, is no concern for who reads it, let alone what they think.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
Saying/doing, looking, and being, with one's self as the other. Pure action.
Incidentally, 1275 ---> 1275, for "Jesus Christ", in Jewish gematria.
https://www.gematriacalculator.us/
MHF MHF is online now
Gold
MHF's AvatarJoin Date
Mar 2024
Posts
228 ------------> 228 = (220 + 2^3) ---> 222
He joined some like-minded Canucks in the far arctic north: the herds are migrating so they donned their custom made wolf-suits and chased them down on all fours, feasting, farting and fucking like the Kings of the North Country that they are.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
Sort of a "working vacation."