The math is based on a false premise, that MDawg claims to have won each day for 30 days straight.
How can math disprove any of the claims in the current challenge (listed below) ?
I can confirm that all the following are true:
-I have been in Vegas continuously since very early October.
-I have won – net ahead – the exact figures as posted at TruePassage – at both of the resorts we were at before this one, and am net ahead some additional twenty grand at the moment, representing just the win at this third resort.
-That at this resort as of today, I have put in some 71 hours in play, at a 1200 average, with a theoretical loss of some seventy thousand dollars.
-That I have played almost every single day at all three resorts, pretty much every day other than check in and check out days.
-That all of the suites, room, food, beverage, and spa, have been comp’ed, to the tune of some fifty thousand dollars of comp’ed goods and services.
-That I also got a 1000 shopping spree.
What I have said is that MD never claimed to have beaten Baccarat in the long-term. It's possible for him to be ahead for his cumulative play up to this point...and math can't prove otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Darkoz
No one moves forward with a wager when one of the parties can't be trusted.
Both parties would agree that the arbiters are qualified to validate any testimony and documentation, and to abide by their decisions. That's what arbitration is all about. If you can't agree on arbiters that you can both trust, then it's a stalemate. But the idea that MDawg can organize a conspiracy to fool the arbiters is simply your fantasy, and a tactic to weasel out of giving him the opportunity to prove his claims.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Darkoz
I am not going to be having our little meetup
What a shocker...nobody saw that coming from the outset.
But we'll see...AC's not that big of a town, and there are limited styles available in those masks you like to wear. I'm confident I can spot one, with or without any help.
