Bob Dietz' Coming Appeararance On PokerFraudAlert Radio

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

If you, KJ and MD were in a boat with 3 little boys while it started to sink. You would shout, "Quick, save the boys!"
KJ would shout," fuck the Boys" And MD would shout, "Do you think we have time?"

---

The boys would be fine. Guaranteed coach belly would show up with his speedboat, filled with candy and toys and take the boys back to his place to dry off.

And I doubt MD would have much interest in the boys. Now if they were young male camels..... :cool:

Okay wait a minute, what would A.Wolf's role be in all this, because supposedly you are a transvestite.

As far as UNKewlJ, he is a well known groomer, but judging by the old fat and sloppy sugar daddies A.Wolf and MaxPen have seen

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soxfan

the kewl-groomer

---

with, he's not successful at even that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

If Bob Dietz had a 40 year run where his cumulative win rate was 56%, he would not have needed clients or investors. He would have bet, bet, bet and be many-times over millionaire.

---

Tell us the Kelly bet for a 56% handicapper laying -110 with a bankroll of $10k? Then what is his bankroll after winning 56 and losing 44 sequential Kelly bets? What is his bankroll after 40 seasons of this?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Tell us the Kelly bet for a 56% handicapper laying -110 with a bankroll of $10k? Then what is his bankroll after winning 56 and losing 44 sequential Kelly bets? What is his bankroll after 40 seasons of this?

---

oh look coach belly hoping for a "gottch ya" moment.

Off the top of my head....I don't know. :rolleyes: I would need to figure out just what 56% win rate comes to as far as an overall advantage. I am not a heavy math guy especially with formulas and all but I could probably figure it out if I needed to. And if I was claiming to have made a living sports betting for 40 years I would have done so.

In Blackjack, which is what I do for a living, the formula is BR x advantage (different for each TC) x .73 (rounded to .75 for ease).

But I dont do full Kelly, I do fractional kelly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seedvalue

Professional Gamblers / Casino APs who actually make their living from beating casinos do don’t spend all their time trying to convince everyone they are legit. It’s the exact opposite. They don’t want anyone to know because it threatens their ability to earn.

The fact you have spent thousands of hours and years of your life trying to convince everyone with a computer you play blackjack for a living proves you don’t do shit.

100 percent you sell ass and mouth for cash. You play some on the side but your sugar daddies pay the bills. Fact

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Off the top of my head....I don't know.

---

Then how do you know this?...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

If Bob Dietz had a 40 year run where his cumulative win rate was 56%... He would have bet, bet, bet and be many-times over millionaire.

---

Is that your estimate, that his bankroll would be how many millions?

Why isn't this retard out winning 80% of his tie bets?

It isn't clear to me, nor have I seen any evidence, even by his comments that Seedvalue was any kind of blackjack expert or professional blackjack player, so I don't really care what he opined.

As for me, My first dozen or so years living and playing in Las Vegas, I was a grinder type player, playing every day, for many hours. If you go back and look, you will see that most of my online posting occurred in the evenings when I returned home.

It was about 4 years ago, right around the time of Covid, that I re-invented myself and how I play, mostly due to heat related issues, and began playing much less but for higher stakes, only during busier weekend night times. So yes, Now I have much more time, which I am filling with my own +EV sports betting (bonus play), which leaves me much more time to post if that is what I choose. There are times that I get involved with a play like the BJ machine play my brother and I hit for 10 weeks last year, and you will see me disappear for a while. So fuck you and seedvalue's opinion.

It so happens currently, I do sports betting every day. Volume betting to get through the rollover requirements. And not being a guy that picks 56% on my own, I spend a couple hours each morning online making my picks. Checking different sites and what different people have to say, checking weather/wind conditions, running simulations. So I am already online, and end up reading the forums and spend too much time.

NOW....what about you. What is your excuse? You claim to be a winning player playing many, many, (probably 100's of days a year in Las Vegas) AND claim to be a working attorney and yet here you are posting on a forum 24/7. What about THAT hun??? :cool:

I don't really judge anyone for posting too much on forums. If that is what we want to do, it is fine. Most cases a waste of time and energy, of which we are all guilty of, but there are worse things we could do to entertain ourselves.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

What’s clear to a child is that I’ve been around these forums only five years and know only one of you personally and yet still I’ve been observed and played and produced evidence of my existence, play and winning. This fraud claims that all these different “APs” know him, that he’s hit these extraordinary six figure jackpots during a penny ante machine career even won a car played all this blackjack in public locations been approached repeatedly to join blackjack teams brought a Vegas casino to its knees to cough up a mid six figure settlement without even going to court and yet after twenty years only a couple of sightings of red green chip play as cover for sugar daddy hustling.

And he’s unable to produce even the tiniest bit of corroboration for anything he claims to be doing it would be like if I couldn’t produce the picture of the inside of a casino hotel room after claiming to have stayed so many nights in one. And his privacy BS means nada I’m private too so I just produce the pictures a bit after I’ve moved on from that spot. And many of the bits of evidence he could produce wouldn’t even potentially affect his privacy.

Wolf is 100% right when he distills it all down to none other than “bullshit reasons” for why he won’t produce evidence to back up anything he claims. The obvious reason is generally the correct one - that he can’t produce what he doesn’t have.

And then we have all the lies he’s been caught in or admitted to.

And the reason he’s a ghost no one knows him even though he claims many know him is because it’s all fabrication and he doesn’t have anything to do with any casinos or APs at all - other than hanging out in casinos for purposes of male prostitution.

It would be offensive if it weren’t so hilarious that he even expects to be taken at all seriously.

Mostly he’s worthy of copy/paste or short responses. Or no response at all. Leave the 10X multipliers to him. :D

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Off the top of my head....I don't know.

---

Then how do you know this?...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

If Bob Dietz had a 40 year run where his cumulative win rate was 56%... He would have bet, bet, bet and be many-times over millionaire.

---

Is that your estimate, that his bankroll would be how many millions?

---

Oh stop it with you attempted "gottch ya" moments CB.

It takes about 53% to break even with the vig...generally. If someone is hitting 56% for 40 years, they would be a multi-millionaire, even if not betting perfect Kelly.

Wasn't it you who discovered the man owed $500 in back taxes? More recently he himself said he owes $900 in back taxes. Of which he pays 1% penelty each month. That is 12% a year. Does THAT sound like a sucessful 40 year sports bettor? come on man.

And I will tell you something else. I have never wanted to get into this because where a person lives and the circumstances surrounding that really should be private. But Bob Dietz made it public and put it on the table for fair discussion when he repeatedly posted his name and address.

So it is fair game, so lets talk about that little house in Johnson City. What we hear from Dietz is how Johnson City is one of the top 10 places to live. I guess every successful sports bettor/gambler is flocking there. :rolleyes:

But the reality of it is, that just as Kim Lee figured out, Dietz's wife supported him, which allowed him to do his sports scam-dicapping for decades and break even or maybe even make a few bucks. She supported him. She, a professor at East Tenn State, bought that house. He inherited it when she passed. He remains in that house in East Bumble <-:rolleyes: fuck Tennesse, not because it is a great place to live, but it is nearly free for him. All he has to do is pay the taxes and well.... :rolleyes:

I can't believe that Mdog, who might be the only person to waste more time posting than me, would have the balls to question my posting so much. :D

Here is a little secret Dog. While Jdaewoo's post mock all the winning you claim, there is a secondary point to the and that is why aren't you out doing what you claim, instead of wasting all that time posting on a forum with 12 people? I guess you haven't figured that out.

Ok, enough for me for today. Going out for a while. Druff really should pay me for keeping this little forum alive and hoppin...:D

Redietz, when you write about Kelly are you talking about full kelly or fractional kelly? Or are you talking about both?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

REDietz should appear on the program. If he has indeed done this all his adult life it seems like he would be a great candidate for the show.

We have lying male prostitutes like UNKewlJ who pretend that they do this, and others who claim they do this part time or have done it for part of their lives, but REDietz is the real deal!

---

So all we need now is for redietz to confirm mdawg is the real gambling deal. How bout it ditz?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

KewlJ, you have repeatedly lied on this and other forums. You have admitted to many of these lies.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

What we hear from Dietz is how Johnson City is one of the top 10 places to live. I guess every successful sports bettor/gambler is flocking there.

---

If he's only betting NCAA football, 100 days of the year, then where should he live the other 265 days?

How about with his wife, in a top 10 place to live college town, where she's a professor?

Does that make any sense to you?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Kim Lee is on the East coast. I am in Vegas. Already confirmed by Dan Druff. And no

---

while I do believe Dan is correct and I dont think you guys are the same person.

Dan Druff can't say with 100% certainty since there are ways to get around this stuff. Do you think I'm risking many thousands of dollars at online casinos with multiple accounts without getting around this stuff?

---

Kim lee tried to meet up with Singer in 2018. You know for sure kj would never go for that.

Let me tell you the stories of Stanford Wong and AxelWolf's craps table. Stanford was promoting this silly dice control theory. It is based on the "blanket roll" concept that if you roll the dice like wagon wheels, then you will eliminate or at least suppress the numbers on the axles. Some guys on the the BJ21 page rented a professional slow-motion movie camera. Even with the softest roll, dice bounced chaotically with no hope of preserving any of the original orientation.

Nevertheless, people continued to practice throwing dice. I saw AxelWolf's table at April's house. April's husband practiced assiduously on that table. He also had a little box to practice while travelling. April's husband came by my house, and we set the box up in my basement. He backed up, threw the dice, and missed the whole box! He then complained that my basement floor was not level. That was probably true, but if you missed a 2-foot box, why would I suspect you can control dice to within millimeters?

On BJ21, young "Little Joe" reported rolling only 1/9 sevens at home, much less that the 1/7 by chance. Stanford teamed up with him, and Fezzik and I bet they could not roll a low number of sevens. During the challenge, Stanford rolling an average number of sevens, and Little Joe did well, winning a bit.

After this, a team flew Little Joe out and put him up in Vegas (with comps). They took him out to tables and Joe rolled too many sevens. Eventually, his cumulative monitored rolls were worse than chance, and the group gave up. Afterwards Joe complained the tables were too bouncy, too soft, too long, too short. He wanted another free vacation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Redietz, when you write about Kelly are you talking about full kelly or fractional kelly? Or are you talking about both?

---

I have thoughts on this, but I know you want Red to answer, so I will hold off. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kim Lee

Let me tell you the stories of Stanford Wong and AxelWolf's craps table. Stanford was promoting this silly dice control theory. It is based on the "blanket roll" concept that if you roll the dice like wagon wheels, then you will eliminate or at least suppress the numbers on the axles. Some guys on the the BJ21 page rented a professional slow-motion movie camera. Even with the softest roll, dice bounced chaotically with no hope of preserving any of the original orientation.

Nevertheless, people continued to practice throwing dice. I saw AxelWolf's table at April's house. April's husband practiced assiduously on that table. He also had a little box to practice while travelling. April's husband came by my house, and we set the box up in my basement. He backed up, threw the dice, and missed the whole box! He then complained that my basement floor was not level. That was probably true, but if you missed a 2-foot box, why would I suspect you can control dice to within millimeters?

On BJ21, young "Little Joe" reported rolling only 1/9 sevens at home, much less that the 1/7 by chance. Stanford teamed up with him, and Fezzik and I bet they could not roll a low number of sevens. During the challenge, Stanford rolling an average number of sevens, and Little Joe did well, winning a bit.

After this, a team flew Little Joe out and put him up in Vegas (with comps). They took him out to tables and Joe rolled too many sevens. Eventually, his cumulative monitored rolls were worse than chance, and the group gave up. Afterwards Joe complained the tables were too bouncy, too soft, too long, too short. He wanted another free vacation.

---

Just to be clear, it was not my table, we as a group invested in a table, and I got out fairly quickly. Ownership of the table went to someone else. This was all before the popularity of dice control became a thing. It was only after that that the Dominator stuff all started.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kim Lee

Let me tell you the stories of Stanford Wong and AxelWolf's craps table. Stanford was promoting this silly dice control theory. It is based on the "blanket roll" concept that if you roll the dice like wagon wheels, then you will eliminate or at least suppress the numbers on the axles. Some guys on the the BJ21 page rented a professional slow-motion movie camera. Even with the softest roll, dice bounced chaotically with no hope of preserving any of the original orientation.

Nevertheless, people continued to practice throwing dice. I saw AxelWolf's table at April's house. April's husband practiced assiduously on that table. He also had a little box to practice while travelling. April's husband came by my house, and we set the box up in my basement. He backed up, threw the dice, and missed the whole box! He then complained that my basement floor was not level. That was probably true, but if you missed a 2-foot box, why would I suspect you can control dice to within millimeters?

On BJ21, young "Little Joe" reported rolling only 1/9 sevens at home, much less that the 1/7 by chance. Stanford teamed up with him, and Fezzik and I bet they could not roll a low number of sevens. During the challenge, Stanford rolling an average number of sevens, and Little Joe did well, winning a bit.

After this, a team flew Little Joe out and put him up in Vegas (with comps). They took him out to tables and Joe rolled too many sevens. Eventually, his cumulative monitored rolls were worse than chance, and the group gave up. Afterwards Joe complained the tables were too bouncy, too soft, too long, too short. He wanted another free vacation.

---

Great Story Kim Lee. God, I wish there was more of these kinds of stories on this forum and less of the anti-AP crew trying to demonize and drive away real players.

I will tell you the part I am still having trouble with. How Did Wong, a pure math guy, ever come to believe in DI? That is just shocking to me. And the follow up would be why did it take him so long to back away from it. Do you think he wanted all the Royalities from the DI books before he said, it didn't work?