Printable View
Principal...yes, like the guy you blew to get your GED.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I'm sure you meant principle, Mr Villanova, of which your main principle is to never offer proof of anything you claim, no matter how easy it would be to provide, so that you can gain some semblance of credibility.
Because that's not how tewlj works.
He'll need to consult with his magic 8-ball (aka "attorney"), before he answers that question.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I absolutely LOVE that people like smelly belly get all bent out of shape about something as trivial as spelling on an internet forum. :D:D:DQuote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyPrincipal...yes, like the guy you blew to get your GED.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I'm sure you meant principle, Mr Villanova, of which your main principle is to never offer proof of anything you claim, no matter how easy it would be to provide, so that you can gain some semblance of credibility.
Because that's not how tewlj works.
Admittedly, I am a poor speller. But mostly I just don't care. Sometimes I even see the error because it has a little red line under it meaning it is misspelled and I still click "post" without fixing it. :D
Freaking anal nutjobs. :cool:
Yes, but I did not sign for it. The front desk did, which is how these things are handled where I live.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I think I get where you are going. That I could deny I received it. Not going to do that. I just don't care that much. :rolleyes:
Freudian slip?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Speaking of anal...you're looking for love in all the wrong places.
Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyPrincipal...yes, like the guy you blew to get your GED.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I'm sure you meant principle, Mr Villanova, of which your main principle is to never offer proof of anything you claim, no matter how easy it would be to provide, so that you can gain some semblance of credibility.
Because that's not how tewlj works.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Why isn't this retard making up more fake stories about being backed off?
It is absolutely BEAUTIFUL watching kew and his lies being ripped to shreds with the accuracy of surgeons wielding their scalpels! And the fool is so dense he just doesn't get it....even if he wants to....
Why isn't this retard posting more fake jackpots with exercise equipment in the background?
lolQuote:
Originally Posted by jdaewoo
I'm very confused. I expected photos. Ohhhh, wait. He said back-rooming, not back-dooring.
Never mind.
Be careful, mdawg. Pumping out truths forces morons like keystroke to lie about you, and makes the slant call you names.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
It's more than most can bear. :)
I don't know or care if you own a toaster. I wouldn't have made the request if I thought you were smart enough to make a fake letter with the right verbiage and formatting.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJNo thank you based solely on principal.Quote:
Originally Posted by pinchingyourballs
But just out of curiosity :rolleyes: ...do you think I don't own a printer?
Since I can't by legal agreement show anything identifying the sender, and won't show anything identifying me or my name or address, I could just print a generic letter (ala Rob Singer's bill of sale) with those areas blocked out, that would meet your requirements, but otherwise prove nothing.
You people crack me up. You really do. :D
You got Singer (of all people), the perpetrator of the phony bill of sale mentioned, among other phony nonsense, talking about somebody seeking attention. Singer!!!:D
But kew---think of the attention it would generate if you even produced ONE piece of documentation supporting your whopper! Your ongoing lie about "Singer's BOS" (correctly stated as "Singer's short-form secondary BOS for out-of-state regisration) just isn't getting the necessary attention you require.
But that what you're getting, IS entertaining.....:)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Why isn't this retard posting more fake stories about being backed off?
Let me help out by organizing this thread in clear, concise, and organized content.
Never Happened.
You're welcome....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Finkle
Thanks for clearing that up. I was at loose ends trying to figure out which was more of a longshot -- the alleged back rooming from this thread or the playing of 50 ATS games a day trying to stay under the radar while working off a bonus for serious money (and making a profit), and then doing it again for serious money at the same site, and then doing it again. The KewlJ(s) have a sports betting profile as under-the-radar as Jimmy Durante's nose (or Pinocchio's).
Would placing 50 bets a day at the same site be something that would not be tolerated? I don't know. You are the expert so thanks for clearing that up. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Now as for me, I don't place 50 wagers a day at one site. I have 5 that I use. So, Mr Expert, would a player making 10 wagers a day be something that is frowned upon? :confused:
A couple of these sportsbooks, I have used for many years before I began doing this bonus play. So if they look back at my history, they STILL will see 5,6,7 losing years before the single winning (with bonus money) year, last year. How is THAT going to play?
There may come a time that the books I am using all cut me off. One already did. I just added a couple new ones. And when that time comes, which I fully expect, I will then decide whether to add new books that I am not as familiar with and confident that I will be paid, or maybe use a new account and name at the ones I am using (the horrors according to redietz) or both. Or maybe I will be done with this play, at least at the level I am currently doing it.
But until that time comes, STFU. You saying stupid shit like a sportsbook is going to flag a player making 10 wagers a day, who has had 5 out of 6 losing years, makes me doubt anything you say or have ever said.
You are so freaking obsessed with a couple players that call or consider themselves APs and not sports bettors, doing something involving sports at an advantage. GET THE FUCK OVER IT! You do not have a monopoly on sports betting. It is probably the fastest growing form of gambling and advantage player over the last 5 years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf