Printable View
You're wasting your time Alan, no, and I don't care about yours. I used to do that for the paper all the time, but they never got published. And who else publishes these things? If it bothers you that these clowns say stupid things, get over it. Doesn't mean a thing to me. Show me Dancers or Scott's or any other known personality who publishes these things and I will too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
But Rob... I thought you were above Dancer or Scott and would do things they wouldn't? Perhaps if you showed your W2Gs they would be obligated to also show their W2Gs? And how sweet it would be for you if they couldn't rise to the challenge?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
My challenge of the century (or, as Gaming Today called my $640k CASH challenge to that loser Fezzik "GT Columnist Lays Down The Gauntlet" after my opponents verified I did indeed put up the cash) has already been made, and I would never ask or expect anyone who says they win to jump thru hoops for other lesser souls. This is peanuts for paupers and you know it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
My wonder here is how you have the time every day for all this stuff. We're traveling the next few days so I'll check in when possible to see if arci can handle the pressure this time around, and more importantly, how you want to work the data meet.
As far as the meet in Vegas for the data shoot, the best day for us to shoot is on a Sunday. The "impossible" days because of our TV show production schedule are Monday and Friday. We would prefer to shoot on Sunday, and we would drive up on Saturday evening after our show is on the air. I usually need to be here to answer phone calls or to make calls after the show.
Why am I here all the time? Absentee owners usually run into trouble.
How nice of you Alan to just keep trying to make Singer do anything different than spewing insults. You're not going to see any proof of anything, because there probably isn't any. I think Eddie's discription of Singer is probably pretty accurate. I think I'm going to start a new thread and just repost all the Singer insults out of 2600+ posts and emphasize what "not getting into the Diplomat Corps" means.
I was thinking it might make a great book, and we could sell it along with the photos of the make-believe jackpots on the Majestic Lions machine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas_lover
I wouldn't call it a great book but it would at least be a thick one :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Looking at your forum alone Alan, I think there are enough pictures of make-believe jackpots to fully "illustrate" the book.
winner of the weekly funniesQuote:
Originally Posted by vegas_lover
Alan, we're off in a few minutes. I'll leave it to you to round up these jealous clowns, who "probably" won't give you answers because they "probably" couldn't afford the trip to anywhere anyway. How about I just snap a pic of all of it. I'll even get a foreign homo to pose next to the boxes with a pair of snowshoes in his hands.
But really, it's all just a waste of time. Arci will never send you anything because he knows what I saw. And I don't care what a few poor broke low-roller vp players understand or believe anyway. Just let Eddie stew for a while, let VL feel special as an example out of the "NED" entitlement society as he really pines to be in LV, and let arci keep lying. What's the harm? Just enjoy it! And if you had a life outside of this gambling stuff, you would too :) Me....even though it's fun watching everyone's reactions as my jackpots kept building up into the "intolerable" zone, it's really motivating me to hit more.
Keep an eye this direction. That's me waving bye-bye to all the little people on this forum :) My next visit will be my next vp play date, of course!
Ha! Ask for any kind of proof, and you're "jealous", "stewing" or "broke". You are a pathetic human being.
As for all your insults, there seems to be a pattern. You hate gay people, divorced people, foreigners, cocktail waitresses (no tipping!), black people (an Obama slammer), people with diabetes and the government. Let me speculate again as you do.
Your parents sexually abused you as a child. Now you have a sexual identity issue. You wanted to come out of the closet but it ruined your marriage. Then you flirted with having a sex change operation to try and fit into one of those pretty outfits the cocktail waitresses wear. Unfortunately a black government social worker denied your request for an increase in your "entitlement" which has reduced you to eating low cost junk food and now you're bordering on diabetic. How's that? Thank God your children are old enough and out on their own. I hope they were spared the sexual and emotional abuse you obviously suffered. Were they Rob, or did you get to them first?
Only in your make believe world are you:
1. Smarter than the 4 mathematicians you supposedly hired.
2. Able to win $1 million dollars by not tipping casino staff, quitting while ahead and using your special plays 5% of the time.
3. Able to hit jackpot VP payouts every time you walk into a casino after "very limited play".
4. Expected to be believed just because you said so.
5. Consider yourself an upstanding citizen when you have admitted to "cheating" on your taxes so that you didn't have to pay any taxes on your $1 million dollars.
I think a big indicator of someone with a gambling addiction is that the person only recounts his stories of big wins, and doesn't talk about his losses. In fact "chasing losses" is probably the number one indicator. Hmmm...sound like anyone we know of?
And I will send Alan a "Notice of Assessment" (Revenue Canada) of my last years Income Tax. I don't play VP or gamble nearly as much as the people here, but it will certainly put and end to your claims that I'm broke or jealous! LOL! If I do that will you send in yours or tell Alan how he can log into the casino's website where you've recorded these wins, plug in your player's card number and view your win/loss statement online? That would be impossible to photoshop or alter.
I'm still trying to figure out why a guy who writes under a pseudonym is telling a guy who writes under his own name that I'll need a disguise to show up at the "data meet." Oh yeah, I guess I'm not the best-looking guy in the world -- that would explain it. Wouldn't want my kisser sneaking into the video frames, eh? Rob, that wasn't very nice. Well, maybe I can rustle up a Rob Argentino mask to help out the ladies, but I'll wear a name tag with my name on it. That should keep things photogenic but on the square.
Keep me posted -- I might actually make the excursion to check a "data meet" out.
I just invested in a swell Ron Burgundy outfit -- dressy maroon cords and a faux leather 70's jacket. I'm ready for the newsroom, baby. And I'll bring a Speedo for the pool-side shots.
P.S. I want everybody to be nice to Rob from here on or he might not show for the meet. He deserves some consideration, plus I hate blowing 25K in air miles for nothing. Thanks, guys.
P.S.S. Please give me a heads up on the date of the data meet. I need to drop a few pounds to be Speedo-worthy.
It's kind of already been done, a few times, such as this one at videopoker.com. That was 2007 and you'll see that little changes; he's still using the same lame put downs he used a decade ago. But please feel free to do it again; these lists are a handy guide to figuring out when Rob's using a new alias.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas_lover
Many of you might be interested in reading this article; Online trolls are everyday sadists so you know a little more about what you are dealing with. You can never argue with a troll, reason with a troll, or expect honest answers from a troll so there isn't any point in trying. He'll say anything in his perverse quest to try and get a rise out of you so if you really want to have an impact don't say anything at all...
Of course everyone should still feel free to point out inconsistencies in his postings. He just loves when you do that as you can see by the way he goes ballistic whenever he is questioned and lashes out at everyone who doesn't bow down before him. Notice too that he'll evade answering anything he can't come up with an excuse for: we're still waiting for an explanation about the progressive deuces royal. That's another Singer trade secret: ignore anything "uncomfortable" for long enough and most people will forget about it.
He's avoided presenting any kind of proof for more than a decade with some of the lamest excuses known to man so trying to get some now is an exercise in futility. There is a simple reason why he won't provide proof and all of you know it: you can't prove something that isn't true. He can tell all the stories he likes but if he could have actually proven anything he would have done it long ago. Rest assured that there are very few people who believe him anyway, and odds are that as his claims become more and more unlikely so does the possibility that the "proof" of what is actually going on will show up, at a time when he least expects it. Its happened before and it will again; its only a matter of time.
And a question for Alan: You say you believe Rob's latest wins because he plays at high denominations so it isn't unusual that he gets those large wins. And you know he plays at those denominations because...????????? If your answer is "because he gets such huge wins" or "because he says he does" you might want to double check your logic.
1. So you admit you are a criminal ... not that anyone suspected otherwise. Since you've already confessed to your crimes it makes no difference whether you post the numbers or not. So, post them already. You have my permission. Back up your claims, little man.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
2. Like I said, mine is ready to go. All you have to do is agree to the years. How about 2004, 2007, 2010?
3. What about those documents. Send them to me and I will scan them in for everyone to assess. Now that you admit you have them it shouldn't be a problem. You know where I live.
Spock: I believe it is possible that he had the huge wins but I don't believe it is possible that he had all of those big wins by just playing the limited amount of time he claimed to have played. And that is what I have been questioning him about: just how much has he been playing?
Now if he says, "gee Alan, the wife has been out of town and I've been playing 30 hours a week" then yes, hitting so many big wins starts to make sense. But if he is sticking to his claims that he dropped into the casino for a half hour on Tuesday night then I have my doubts.
I also would like to see an explanation about the deuces wild win since I never recalled Rob ever talking about playing deuces, and it would really be "magical" if the one time he decides to play he hits a progressive royal.
On an older thread Rob said that Deuces Wild was a suckers' or losers' game with no large payouts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
So Rob has the inside track with the IRS and is able to look up anyone's tax returns? Wow, is there anything he can't do?Quote:
Originally Posted by arcimede$
Wouldn't that implicate his relative who is the IRS employee? Honestly, to say the things he says about what he can "pull off" with the IRS is just stupid and can only jeopardize his relative's career.Quote:
Originally Posted by a2a3dseddie
It is also why relying on anything from the IRS as being sufficient proof of any claim from Rob would be foolish. What's to say his S-I-L just takes whatever Rob tells him to and puts it in an official IRS envelope and posts it to the mail?Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Alan, what do you think of my idea of having him walk you through a casino website with his players card number to view online his win/loss statements? Nobody has to mail anything. He can't photoshop anything. He can even do it over the phone.
I know you can view win/loss statements online on most casino websites, especially at this time of year. Wouldn't that show his purported wins? It would also show his "coin-in" and give us idea of how much he is really playing.
Something I meant to ask him before the insults started flying was this. He claims that when he hit the 50K and 100K winners, he started with a $10,000 bankroll. He had progressed to the top denomination of $25 which I assume was because he had lost a specified amount at the lower denominations. That would mean that he had less than the $10,000 starting amount, no?
Well, he must have been REALLY lucky to hit those big jackpot hands because at $125 per hand, he couldn't have had that many hands left. Even if he started with the full $10,000 at a $25 machine, that's only 80 hands. Even with pushes, and small wins isn't it quite common to be down the dollar value of 80 hands quite quickly?
That seems reasonable, but his stated record of big wins on short play is extremely long and goes back years, like this one from April of 2010:Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Not only does it sound almost exactly the same as some of what he's posted in the past couple of days, it's got all his talking points; huge wins in a short time, knocks against the reality based VP community, and Robs glee when he believes he's causing others pain. I have a feeling you won't find him recanting that any time soon.Quote:
"One of the strangest things is I've seen three $2 royals in the past 3 weeks, and I haven't played more than 4 total hours! That's a tough pill to swallow for the math people and for my haters, but it just makes the whole thing that much sweeter!"
Here is an interesting question for you, and everyone else as well; how many times have you walked into a casino and hit a phenomenal win in your first 10 minutes? How about how many times have you seen someone else sit next to you and do the same? I've never seen either one, but few will be surprised to find out that Rob has claimed all of the following during his "retirement" play.
"I hit a dollar royal on my 4th hand of 6/5 BP after losing my first three."
"I only played ten minutes and hit a bottom line royal"
"Last night at Fandango I was also dealt my 3rd ever, (royal), on $2.
Wasn't there more than 10 minutes"
"Two hands in I was dealt AhKhQhJh10d. She was really into this now and told me to hold the straight. After I giggled and explained the hand to her, the ol' fifth card flip-over popped up again and I had a $2k royal"
And that was just some of the short ones: it would take forever to compile all the wins he claimed that were hit in less than a half hour, and even more if we include all the non-jackpot but highly unusual posts as well such as this one which might be of interest to those who were asking about Rob and DW.
That previous example of the 50 cent heart royal is interesting for another reason as well: the various stories surrounding it have changed a few times. You can read the initial report here, and in this version it was a 50 cent royal. A year later, in this VPFree post, the amount has been changed to a dollar, and there are variations in other aspects of the story as well.
Amazingly, there appears to be yet a 3rd portion to this as well. In this LVA post by BAGiant (Bob), Bob relates a text from Rob he received that showed a 50 cent heart royal that Rob claimed he hit at the Silverton. Rob was posting all his wins here, and never mentioned a 50 cent royal at the Silverton during that time period, however a few weeks later he did write:
He wrote he hit a 50 cent royal at the pizza shop, and then he texted Bob he hit a 50 cent royal at Silverton, both of which were hearts and both of which were in September. I have no idea what excuse he's going to use for this, (I just know he will have one because he always does), but the fact that both were reported as being hearts brings up the possibility he was "double dipping" on that royal, assuming he hit one at all.Quote:
I don't play very often any more but I do have 2 royals ($1 & 50c) in Sept. in maybe 1000 hands.
And it is situations such as these that make me question everything Rob posts. It's a rare event when everything surrounding Rob's claim of a win is "clean", and that coupled with a win rate that defies common sense and a complete refusal to provide definitive proof of even one win should make every reasonable person skeptical.