The value of "proof"

That post seems to have shaken you. Good. Now maybe you'll listen.

The first thing you need to do is ignore the fact that I believe being gay is obtuse at best, and a sickness at worst, and that gay marriage is for truly confused individuals.

Now listen up: blackjack counting was as different in the early 2000's from what's possible today as how well the Clintons hid their corruption back then vs. the price they're paying for it today. Counters at that time could count, lose, claimed they won, and then blab how they were feared by the casinos. I enjoyed exposing that lie. It was all about their gaming businesses.

Today, there's jokers like you, who claim to count two tables at once while never being spotted rubber-necking the table next door--which would have to be done every few seconds with no distractions, blockers, or non-cooperative players not showing every card at the precise time you "peek". Oh....then there's you trying to keep track of the count at your own table, while making bets and not being spotted.

You can see where this is going to any intelligent person: it's nothing but a load of crap. And with counting being closely monitored more than ever before, all a hack like you are here for is to peddle the false narrative about how special you want your peers to think you are.

Well kew, there's nothing special about you, your claims of being a homo, your make believe weirdo husband :) or the fact that you don't like the wizard. My guess is you were the laughing stock over there just like everyone laughs at your bs over here.

Just click ignore on Rob's posts. Seriously. He doesn't know what he's talking about. He never did and he never will.

He just can't help himself RS__ (God, I love those anonymous initials....). Just like you continue to show how you can't :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RS__

Just click ignore on Rob's posts. Seriously. He doesn't know what he's talking about. He never did and he never will.

---

I know. I have him on ignore. But every once in a while I read something of his, usually that someone has quoted and want to respond. I want to attempt to have a civil discussion like he is a normal and reasonable person. I try hard to give everyone that. But Rob quickly reminds me that he is not a reasonable person, that he is a troll....a self described troll that enjoys his roll or troll.

Look at Rob's gay comments in this thread. This is Alan's thread and nowhere in The original post of the thread was there any hint of any subject matter related to anyone's sexuality. And in every response in this thread no one has mentioned anything about anyone's sexuality, EXCEPT for one poster....Rob Singer, who has now brought it up 3 different times, attempting to hijack the thread. He is obsessed with gay people, gay marriage, gay this or that. Nobody cares about that crap except for Rob. He's a sick dude.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

And in every response in this thread no one has mentioned anything about anyone's sexuality, EXCEPT for one poster....Rob Singer, who has now brought it up 3 different times, attempting to hijack the thread. He is obsessed with gay people, gay marriage, gay this or that. Nobody cares about that crap except for Rob. He's a sick dude.

---

Not as sick as the Donkey...AKA Biloxi Bill. Maybe you have him blocked too?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

And in every response in this thread no one has mentioned anything about anyone's sexuality, EXCEPT for one poster....Rob Singer, who has now brought it up 3 different times, attempting to hijack the thread. He is obsessed with gay people, gay marriage, gay this or that. Nobody cares about that crap except for Rob. He's a sick dude.

---

Not as sick as the Donkey...AKA Biloxi Bill. Maybe you have him blocked too?

---

You back for another beating boy?...thought you`d have headed for the hills with your bodyguard/husband being gone for a week, lol.....have you enjoyed your day so far making a pot pie and watching teen porn? :rolleyes:

Check that....teen BOY porn :rolleyes:

Just for my info: I have never played casino blackjack, but did good playing at the golf course and get together, etc. Don't they now have the option of more than one deck and can shuffle anytime? Sorry for the ignorance, but I would say that puts a counter in a tough spot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RS__

Just click ignore on Rob's posts. Seriously. He doesn't know what he's talking about. He never did and he never will.

---

I know. I have him on ignore. But every once in a while I read something of his, usually that someone has quoted and want to respond. I want to attempt to have a civil discussion like he is a normal and reasonable person. I try hard to give everyone that. But Rob quickly reminds me that he is not a reasonable person, that he is a troll....a self described troll that enjoys his roll or troll.

Look at Rob's gay comments in this thread. This is Alan's thread and nowhere in The original post of the thread was there any hint of any subject matter related to anyone's sexuality. And in every response in this thread no one has mentioned anything about anyone's sexuality, EXCEPT for one poster....Rob Singer, who has now brought it up 3 different times, attempting to hijack the thread. He is obsessed with gay people, gay marriage, gay this or that. Nobody cares about that crap except for Rob. He's a sick dude.

---

The only posts of his I read are the ones where someone quoted him...and even then, just skip it all once I realize it's a quote of Rob. Hopefully the troll will die off from the forum (figuratively, of course!) if he isn't fed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slingshot

Just for my info: I have never played casino blackjack, but did good playing at the golf course and get together, etc. Don't they now have the option of more than one deck and can shuffle anytime? Sorry for the ignorance, but I would say that puts a counter in a tough spot.

---

Almost all blackjack is played with more than 1 deck. They typically only shuffle once they get to the cut card. It's really not that big of a hindrance...other than the fact it's not as good as it was years ago.

I don't like Rob's attacks against kewlj and Dan this is where you should draw the line. Prejudice has no place here.

But I have to admit Rob summed up the problem of counting two tables.

I discussed this again with a card counting buddy of mine. When I told him there are now two posters on the forum who claim to count two tables he broke out in laughter and said "now these guys are competing for attention? I'd like to see even one card counter accomplish this under real conditions."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

I don't like Rob's attacks against kewlj and Dan this is where you should draw the line. Prejudice has no place here.

But I have to admit Rob summed up the problem of counting two tables.

I discussed this again with a card counting buddy of mine. When I told him there are now two posters on the forum who claim to count two tables he broke out in laughter and said "now these guys are competing for attention? I'd like to see even one card counter accomplish this under real conditions."

---

Is that the guy who's like 50 y/o, plays 25c VP because he can't afford to play higher or make money AP'ing, and lives in his mom's basement? Regardless, you don't have the best track record, from what you've posted, for knowing knowledgeable APs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Math doesn't dispute that a random roller threw 18 yos in a row.

---

Actually, Alan, I think the math does dispute that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Meanwhile, some rail tramp who liked to drink, or some young punk smart ass kid, or some guy who was broke when he started, even guys who are highly educated with other successful careers found a way to be successful at gambling/AP.

---

Axel, whose this rail tramp you are talking about? Do we know anyone like that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Biloxi Bill

You look like a fucking boob claiming Im this LoneStar person...why not ask Dan if my IP ever showed up from any different place than the one I alwasy use, or if it ever matched that person whom you are fascinated with

---

No point asking Dan, you always claimed to be an expert at changing IP proxies.

But the one thing you couldn't change is your writing style, the prolific use of Ellipses...exactly like LoneStarHorse.

It's all in the archives, the style is identical.

---

No, the styles are not identical. LSH put his text above the quote every time. BB doesn't do that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

The 1-AA schools obviously don't get the big TV money, but that doesn't mean the top notch ones can't play. Brand names and TV ratings are what garner the money. It'll be entertaining to see the computer ratings this year, because the top 70 or so, almost all of whom will go to bowls, are going to be dotted with 1-AA schools, who don't go to bowls. It'll be an ongoing slap in the face of the big money schools that the 1-AA schools have higher ratings and are considered (by the computers) to be better than many of the 1-A squads.

---

GO GRIZ!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

That post seems to have shaken you. Good. Now maybe you'll listen.

The first thing you need to do is ignore the fact that I believe being gay is obtuse at best, and a sickness at worst, and that gay marriage is for truly confused individuals.

Now listen up: blackjack counting was as different in the early 2000's from what's possible today as how well the Clintons hid their corruption back then vs. the price they're paying for it today. Counters at that time could count, lose, claimed they won, and then blab how they were feared by the casinos. I enjoyed exposing that lie. It was all about their gaming businesses.

Today, there's jokers like you, who claim to count two tables at once while never being spotted rubber-necking the table next door--which would have to be done every few seconds with no distractions, blockers, or non-cooperative players not showing every card at the precise time you "peek". Oh....then there's you trying to keep track of the count at your own table, while making bets and not being spotted.

You can see where this is going to any intelligent person: it's nothing but a load of crap. And with counting being closely monitored more than ever before, all a hack like you are here for is to peddle the false narrative about how special you want your peers to think you are.

Well kew, there's nothing special about you, your claims of being a homo, your make believe weirdo husband :) or the fact that you don't like the wizard. My guess is you were the laughing stock over there just like everyone laughs at your bs over here.

---

This post is a prime example of how incredibly ignorant-and stupid-Rob really is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RS__

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

I don't like Rob's attacks against kewlj and Dan this is where you should draw the line. Prejudice has no place here.

But I have to admit Rob summed up the problem of counting two tables.

I discussed this again with a card counting buddy of mine. When I told him there are now two posters on the forum who claim to count two tables he broke out in laughter and said "now these guys are competing for attention? I'd like to see even one card counter accomplish this under real conditions."

---

Is that the guy who's like 50 y/o, plays 25c VP because he can't afford to play higher or make money AP'ing, and lives in his mom's basement? Regardless, you don't have the best track record, from what you've posted, for knowing knowledgeable APs.

---

No.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dannyj

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Math doesn't dispute that a random roller threw 18 yos in a row.

---

Actually, Alan, I think the math does dispute that.

---

No, the math only says what the chances are of that random shooter throwing 18 yos in a row. The math doesn't say it can't be done, nor does it say it didn't happen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Meanwhile, some rail tramp who liked to drink, or some young punk smart ass kid, or some guy who was broke when he started, even guys who are highly educated with other successful careers found a way to be successful at gambling/AP.

---

Axel, whose this rail tramp you are talking about? Do we know anyone like that?

---

I don't know if that's the correct term. I was obviously refering to you. It was not meant to be offensive or derogatory (I appoligize if it was). It's to my understanding that you proudly road the rails prior to finding casino AP.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dannyj

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Math doesn't dispute that a random roller threw 18 yos in a row.

---

Actually, Alan, I think the math does dispute that.

---

No, the math only says what the chances are of that random shooter throwing 18 yos in a row. The math doesn't say it can't be done, nor does it say it didn't happen.

---

The math shows it's a million times more lilkey that you were delusional at the time.

Delusional disorder is a mental illness in which the patient presents with delusions, but with no accompanying prominent hallucinations, thought disorder, mood disorder, or significant flattening of affect.[1][2] Delusions are a specific symptom of psychosis. Delusions can be "bizarre" or "non-bizarre" in content;[2] non-bizarre delusions are fixed false beliefs that involve situations that could potentially occur in real life, such as being followed or poisoned.[3] Apart from their delusions, people with delusional disorder may continue to socialize and function in a normal manner and their behavior does not necessarily generally seem odd