Stupid thread I don't think so, it has been a nice party.Quote:
Originally Posted by jdog
Printable View
Stupid thread I don't think so, it has been a nice party.Quote:
Originally Posted by jdog
Alan banned my ThomasClines account, for suggesting, along with Singer, that Alan had a gambling problem, and, Druff banned my OneHitWonder account, for posting up a picture of an "AP gun" with bent-backward barrel, in a newbie thread about the benefits of gambling. The latter OP, very likely, was the last bit of "fresh blood", before promptly "heading for the hills".Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
https://youtu.be/_vxvH9tevPU
Up to now, results inconclusive. KewlJ hasn't voted and his vote could turn the tide away from him and leave Rob Singer or Garnabby in the lead. It seems KewlJ would vote twice for Rob Singer and leave Rob Singer the most deployable of deplorables.
And I would enjoy such a scenario. Agitating the little people around here with the Undeniable Truth is my specialty!Quote:
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesday
Talking about your grandkids that haven't moved out yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerAnd I would enjoy such a scenario. Agitating the little people around here with the Undeniable Truth is my specialty!Quote:
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesday
You are fucked up in your head. You are the ultimate little person, you may as well welcome us all to Munchkin land and park the Newell up your butt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerAnd I would enjoy such a scenario. Agitating the little people around here with the Undeniable Truth is my specialty!Quote:
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesday
I still don't get how Garnabby got SIC votes for most Despised VCT Member. :confused: The ONLY things that Posters don't like about Garnabby is his hijacking threads with anagrams and numerology. Nothing too bad like Doxxing Posters or insulting them.
I can answer that for you - Africa anus noteworthyQuote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
2348 314 47 19 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 21 23 29 47 31 119
Title at a quick glance reads as
Poll: Most depressed VCT member voting -
which would of course be UNKewlJ.
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenI can answer that for you - Africa anus noteworthyQuote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
2348 314 47 19 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 21 23 29 47 31 119
---> The Great Derangement: A Terrifying True Story of War, Politics, & Religion at the Twilight of the American Empire.Quote:
Tasha, every one in here is slip, sliding away at the "game of life". So, it's not really, in theory, or, actually, in practice, the anagrams with gematria that frightens them, but, someone with other plans.
https://anagram-solver.net/Tashaever...s?partial=true
Quote:
Taibbi discusses 9/11 conspiracy theories as symptomatic of what he calls the "derangement" of American society; a disconnection from reality due to widespread "disgust with our political system". Drawing a parallel with the charismatic movement, he argues that both "chose to battle bugbears that were completely idiotic, fanciful, and imaginary", instead of taking control of their own lives. While critical, Taibbi explains that 9/11 conspiracy theories are different from "Clinton-era black-helicopter paranoia", and constitute more than "a small, scattered group of nutcases ... they really were, just as they claim to be, almost everyone you meet."
Well I know this book argues that everyone now has an alternative reality, but you could argue that relativity of simultaneity is evidence that there really is no objective reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
---> The Great Derangement: A Terrifying True Story of War, Politics, & Religion at the Twilight of the American Empire.Quote:
Tasha, every one in here is slip, sliding away at the "game of life". So, it's not really, in theory, or, actually, in practice, the anagrams with gematria that frightens them, but, someone with other plans.
https://anagram-solver.net/Tashaever...s?partial=true
Quote:
Taibbi discusses 9/11 conspiracy theories as symptomatic of what he calls the "derangement" of American society; a disconnection from reality due to widespread "disgust with our political system". Drawing a parallel with the charismatic movement, he argues that both "chose to battle bugbears that were completely idiotic, fanciful, and imaginary", instead of taking control of their own lives. While critical, Taibbi explains that 9/11 conspiracy theories are different from "Clinton-era black-helicopter paranoia", and constitute more than "a small, scattered group of nutcases ... they really were, just as they claim to be, almost everyone you meet."
It would be a tie between you and him.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgTitle at a quick glance reads as
Poll: Most depressed VCT member voting -
which would of course be UNKewlJ.
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
The nature of reality is that reality has no nature.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenWell I know this book argues that everyone now has an alternative reality, but you could argue that relativity of simultaneity is evidence that there really is no objective reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
---> The Great Derangement: A Terrifying True Story of War, Politics, & Religion at the Twilight of the American Empire.
https://anagram-solver.net/Tashaever...s?partial=true
Quote:
Taibbi discusses 9/11 conspiracy theories as symptomatic of what he calls the "derangement" of American society; a disconnection from reality due to widespread "disgust with our political system". Drawing a parallel with the charismatic movement, he argues that both "chose to battle bugbears that were completely idiotic, fanciful, and imaginary", instead of taking control of their own lives. While critical, Taibbi explains that 9/11 conspiracy theories are different from "Clinton-era black-helicopter paranoia", and constitute more than "a small, scattered group of nutcases ... they really were, just as they claim to be, almost everyone you meet."
I suppose it is a surprise Mdawg got no votes. I have nothing against him besides I don't like how he always uses quotes in much excess considering they aren't a part of the current thread. I have never been very interested reading his threads about whatever he claims his life is
true or false I care less.
But what’s the reality of nature? Is it better than nurture?Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFThe nature of reality is that reality has no nature.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenWell I know this book argues that everyone now has an alternative reality, but you could argue that relativity of simultaneity is evidence that there really is no objective reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
---> The Great Derangement: A Terrifying True Story of War, Politics, & Religion at the Twilight of the American Empire.
https://anagram-solver.net/Tashaever...s?partial=true
The latter involves a different definition of nature. In the sense that nor is reality nurtured.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenBut what’s the reality of nature? Is it better than nurture?Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFThe nature of reality is that reality has no nature.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
This would be contrary to the premise of the book you mentioned, The Great Derangement, if I understand the premise correctly from reading the summary.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFThe latter involves a different definition of nature. In the sense that nor is reality nurtured.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenBut what’s the reality of nature? Is it better than nurture?Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
The book argues that Americans cannot agree on one reality or one set of objective facts.
So the book appears to be arguing that different versions of reality can be nurtured & that is the whole issue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenThis would be contrary to the premise of the book you mentioned, The Great Derangement, if I understand the premise correctly from reading the summary.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFThe latter involves a different definition of nature. In the sense that nor is reality nurtured.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
The book argues that Americans cannot agree on one reality or one set of objective facts.
So the book appears to be arguing that different versions of reality can be nurtured & that is the whole issue.
Ah, but, I have other plans. As someone who knows the true nature of reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
But nobody knows the true nature of reality except for the true nature of reality to them specifically. If every human was completely colorblind except for one, then the one non colorblind person who perceived the sky as blue would be considered as someone out of touch with reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFQuote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenThis would be contrary to the premise of the book you mentioned, The Great Derangement, if I understand the premise correctly from reading the summary.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
The book argues that Americans cannot agree on one reality or one set of objective facts.
So the book appears to be arguing that different versions of reality can be nurtured & that is the whole issue.
Ah, but, I have other plans. As someone who knows the true nature of reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF
As out of touch, with reality, as to be back in touch, with reality. In other words, the original/final expression, theme, or dimension, of the universe must somehow overlay, or coincide with, the stuff of the universe; so as not to be yet another thus extension of it. The theory of everything already exists among us. Something new, from the old, which remains a part of each.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenBut nobody knows the true nature of reality except for the true nature of reality to them specifically. If every human was completely colorblind except for one, then the one non colorblind person who perceived the sky as blue would be considered as someone out of touch with reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHFQuote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
Ah, but, I have other plans. As someone who knows the true nature of reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MHF