I'm not agreeing with your personal attacks on KJ, but I think you missed a golden opportunity here!! It should have been...Quote:
Originally Posted by Keystone
Are you trying to get into Tasha`s blackhole? No,no, it must be Nathan`s brown one.
Printable View
I'm not agreeing with your personal attacks on KJ, but I think you missed a golden opportunity here!! It should have been...Quote:
Originally Posted by Keystone
Are you trying to get into Tasha`s blackhole? No,no, it must be Nathan`s brown one.
I thank you for sharing that recap Druff. No real benefit, I was just curious. It seems not logging on to 9am or so Vegas time, I miss the prime time discussions. I actually wake up at 6-6:30 am, but being first up in the household, that is my time. I like to go out on the balcony, when it is still cool and usually a breeze blowing and watch vegas come to life while I eat breakfast. Just not ready to spoil that by reading VCT so early. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druffblackhole kept posting the same annoying YouTube video of a terrible violin sound.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
He posted it in response to every single post he didn't like. He did it 4 times in a row in a recent thread I started.
I deleted them and asked him to stop.
blackhole responded by telling me "FUCK OFF".
monet then told him he was being a pussy, and that the ballsy move would be to post that video again.
blackhole did just that.
I banned him.
Now I do have a question. So 'free speech' doesn't extend to the freedom to post the same annoying video? When blackhole started posting that same video over and over, I actually looked to see if there was a rule against it. Most forums have some sort of rule against posting the same thing over and over. I didn't see anything. So basically the rules are if it annoys you (Dan Druff), similarly to how almost anything goes here, no personal attack too vile, unless of course someone is saying something about you or Jewish folks. :rolleyes: In this case blackhole told YOU to fuck off so that is bannable offense. That is kind of weak.
Now don't get me wrong, Blackhole should have been banned long ago, not because he told you to fuck off (what happened to that freedom of speech? I guess it is selective), but because you as the only administrator long ago determined he was contributing nothing to the forum other than trolling and trying to be dispuptive. THAT is a reason, not selective non freedom of speech.
I guess what I am saying, is what I have been saying forever. I would like there to be more clarity, not just fly by the moment decisions based on if YOU are offended. Is that really too much to ask?
I like this forum the way it is. Don't change a thing. :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
What do you think are your chances of lasting on the forum if there was more clarity?
I also pointed out that Wynnpleasure should have been banned for making disgusting lies about me and my Family , falsely claiming I had Lesbian Incest sex with my Sisters and had Incest sex with my Father and falsely claimed that I was a drug addict and a Prostitute. He could have gotten me fired had I been a Teacher for little kids. He also made up a Gay Threesome lie about him and two Married and Straight Men. Had The Wives ACTUALLY believed the Gay Threesome lie, it could have resorted to Double Divorces. One of these Married Men has Multiple Children with said Wife. He could have had his Kids taken away from him as a Result of the Divorces had she believed the Gay Threesome lie.... Wynnpleasure was ONLY Banned after he made unfunny Anti Semite jokes not knowing that Dan Druff is Jewish. When he was told that he just signed his own imminent ban papers with those unfunny Anti Semite jokes since Dan Druff is Jewish, he claimed he loved Jews and didn't mean those unfunny Anti Semite jokes. Too late, Dan banned him when he visited again.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI thank you for sharing that recap Druff. No real benefit, I was just curious. It seems not logging on to 9am or so Vegas time, I miss the prime time discussions. I actually wake up at 6-6:30 am, but being first up in the household, that is my time. I like to go out on the balcony, when it is still cool and usually a breeze blowing and watch vegas come to life while I eat breakfast. Just not ready to spoil that by reading VCT so early. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druffblackhole kept posting the same annoying YouTube video of a terrible violin sound.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
He posted it in response to every single post he didn't like. He did it 4 times in a row in a recent thread I started.
I deleted them and asked him to stop.
blackhole responded by telling me "FUCK OFF".
monet then told him he was being a pussy, and that the ballsy move would be to post that video again.
blackhole did just that.
I banned him.
Now I do have a question. So 'free speech' doesn't extend to the freedom to post the same annoying video? When blackhole started posting that same video over and over, I actually looked to see if there was a rule against it. Most forums have some sort of rule against posting the same thing over and over. I didn't see anything. So basically the rules are if it annoys you (Dan Druff), similarly to how almost anything goes here, no personal attack too vile, unless of course someone is saying something about you or Jewish folks. :rolleyes: In this case blackhole told YOU to fuck off so that is bannable offense. That is kind of weak.
Now don't get me wrong, Blackhole should have been banned long ago, not because he told you to fuck off (what happened to that freedom of speech? I guess it is selective), but because you as the only administrator long ago determined he was contributing nothing to the forum other than trolling and trying to be dispuptive. THAT is a reason, not selective non freedom of speech.
I guess what I am saying, is what I have been saying forever. I would like there to be more clarity, not just fly by the moment decisions based on if YOU are offended. Is that really too much to ask?
I don't know. Let me ask your wife? Oh, she can't hear the question as her ear has decayed and fallen off.Quote:
Originally Posted by BoSoxQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
What do you think are your chances of lasting on the forum if there was more clarity?
Adding to the list of things it is possible to get banned from VCT for:
1. Anti-Semite posting
2. Telling Dan to fuck off.
That’s it. That’s the entire list. Maybe a slight surprise Rob never triggered the ban hammer with the California snowflake needle.
Boo !! Boo !! get off the stage you stink to high heaven Boo !!Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI don't know. Let me ask your wife? Oh, she can't hear the question as her ear has decayed and fallen off.Quote:
Originally Posted by BoSoxQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
What do you think are your chances of lasting on the forum if there was more clarity?
That 'stink' isn't me. The former Mrs BoSox has been a little lax with her hygiene practices lately.Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyBoo !! Boo !! get off the stage you stink to high heaven Boo !!Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI don't know. Let me ask your wife? Oh, she can't hear the question as her ear has decayed and fallen off.Quote:
Originally Posted by BoSox
He has let a lot slide in regards to Anti Semite posts towards himself and others. Also many people have told him off here and at PFA without incident. Its just very convenient to say these things, to try and make him look like the bad guy. Blackhole should have gotten the door prize a long time ago, this was the nail in the coffin. Imagine people having the balls to call out Rusty Shackleford the 5000 + times he suspended people for bogus or questionable reasons. That spineless little boy has suspended people for 0.1 % of what Bholes numerous infractions were. Wise upQuote:
Originally Posted by mcap
It’s quite interesting seeing this transformation in Tinkerbell.... he used to cry like a little bitch when it was said by a few that his old homo boyfriend died of aids, and now look at him(?) lolQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJThat 'stink' isn't me. The former Mrs BoSox has been a little lax with her hygiene practices lately.Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyBoo !! Boo !! get off the stage you stink to high heaven Boo !!Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
That is correct, Miss. This is a troll forum. I have been trolled forever. And Now I am returing the trolling, just like promised.Quote:
Originally Posted by Keystone
KJ, no offense dude but sometimes it seems that you're too much of a "nice guy" to effectively go head to head with some of the more entrenched trolls here.
I give you an A for effort, but I fear that your heart is not dark / evil enough to match them; you need to dig deep to find aspersions and insults whereas to them it comes naturally.
Yes there is no shortage of heavyweights per capita over here, hence thin skinned fairys just lurk or stop posting all together !Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
You are correct MisterV and I thank you for saying that, but being "a nice guy" only results in being bullied and trolled on this forum, so I am trying my best to be a dick, as uncharacteristic as that is for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
I don't know why you and others celebrate and admire bullying, trollish behavior like you do. It is like this forum is prison mentality and apreciates all the evil of society.Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyYes there is no shortage of heavyweights per capita over here, hence thin skinned fairys just lurk or stop posting all together !Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Looks like you have some shit on your nose ozzyQuote:
Originally Posted by OzzyHe has let a lot slide in regards to Anti Semite posts towards himself and others. Also many people have told him off here and at PFA without incident. Its just very convenient to say these things, to try and make him look like the bad guy. Blackhole should have gotten the door prize a long time ago, this was the nail in the coffin. Imagine people having the balls to call out Rusty Shackleford the 5000 + times he suspended people for bogus or questionable reasons. That spineless little boy has suspended people for 0.1 % of what Bholes numerous infractions were. Wise upQuote:
Originally Posted by mcap
Society in general has gotten so passive/weak its nice to be able to let off some steam in the gym/online. Even with your fragile ego/personality I give you credit for taking a beating and sticking up for yourself. I don't agree with Robbie that your a thin skinned fairy :)Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI don't know why you and others celebrate and admire bullying, trollish behavior like you do. It is like this forum is prison mentality and apreciates all the evil of society.Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyYes there is no shortage of heavyweights per capita over here, hence thin skinned fairys just lurk or stop posting all together !Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
I call things the way I see it, good, bad or ugly. I've always been able to read the playing field and it's characters. You are a bottom feeder TROLL nothing more nothing less.Quote:
Originally Posted by mcapLooks like you have some shit on your nose ozzyQuote:
Originally Posted by OzzyHe has let a lot slide in regards to Anti Semite posts towards himself and others. Also many people have told him off here and at PFA without incident. Its just very convenient to say these things, to try and make him look like the bad guy. Blackhole should have gotten the door prize a long time ago, this was the nail in the coffin. Imagine people having the balls to call out Rusty Shackleford the 5000 + times he suspended people for bogus or questionable reasons. That spineless little boy has suspended people for 0.1 % of what Bholes numerous infractions were. Wise upQuote:
Originally Posted by mcap
You ask me you’re the one constantly trolling me with the can’t keep my name out of your posts and always trying to antagonize Tasha into shit you anticipate will get me going.
You two need to get a room.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJYou are correct MisterV and I thank you for saying that, but being "a nice guy" only results in being bullied and trolled on this forum, so I am trying my best to be a dick, as uncharacteristic as that is for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Aw, someone is jealous.
Someone who said he blocked me.
But that's fine, I know how to handle liars.
Quick Update on the Remodel.
All New Uponor Pipe Installed.
Price was $5800
They left about 20-25 large size holes all over the place in the drywall.
Of course they don't clean up as they are not a cleaning company.
I'll be busy getting rid of all this drywall dust off of everything for a day or so.
Next Step is to get at least one bathroom remodeled asap.
Get these damn holes repaired.
The Nightmare Continues.
I worked construction in Atlanta one summer during college, building condos.
The sheet rockers were complete assholes; they shit and pissed in buckets and left it for others to clean up.
Sheet rockers are notorious for camping in the house they are currently sheet rocking. When the sheet rock goes in is about the time the electricity is turned on. Some rockers go the homeless route and take advantage of the situation to live rent free.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Too late now, but hire the painters first, then have them recommend the sheet-rockers.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
With all the issues perhaps you should consider an accidental fire. I know there is a term for it but I think it falls under being unacceptable here.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
Still remodeling.
Finished up patching 23 large holes in my drywall.
Getting ready to attempt to blend in the knock down texture.
After that I get to install the shower valve and build a shower floor... fun.
You're paranoid.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
Had you mentioned the term, you'd have the same odds of getting nuked as you would getting hit by Jewish lightning.
Finally got back on this bathroom today and put up some wall tile. Gonna get the two shower wing walls done tomorrow provided I don't get lazy.
If I never see another tile spacer in my life that would be fine with me.
And where are the self levelers?
Self levelers are a gimmick someone came up with not long ago for the DIY crowd. I have never used them. My eyeballs still work.Quote:
Originally Posted by jdaewoo
Finally finished the bathroom project. Had to wait about a month or so to get a special order door in at Lowe's due to shortages and shipping crisis. Didn't want standard height because I hate ducking to get in and out of a shower.
Very nice!
My younger brother has been in charge of maintenance for a development of townhomes, mainly senior residents. He's been doing this kind of thing on a high volume level for years.
I think Blackhole may have been right to some degree. Recently a slot attendant mentioned he made $60,000 a year. A lot of successful APs work 80-100 hours a week at times with no life at all.
I love it. Very casinoey. Fine work.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenFinally finished the bathroom project. Had to wait about a month or so to get a special order door in at Lowe's due to shortages and shipping crisis. Didn't want standard height because I hate ducking to get in and out of a shower.
What exactly did you do? All the tile and the sinks, cabinets, shower doors, new fixtures?
RIP �� remodel project
Yes, everything.Quote:
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesday
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenYes, everything.Quote:
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesday
It really looks great. Very impressed.
Why do you always need to show off bro?Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Not showing off. Doing a little bonding, maybe. Obviously, the work my brother has done is not as high end as this. That's why I said "very nice!"Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionWhy do you always need to show off bro?Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
I appreciate anyone who can do this kind of work. This kind of skill often goes unappreciated, is my point. My dad dabbled with this, but did not have results anywhere near as polished as what MaxPen did. I spent my teens in an attic my dad converted into a bedroom. Looked pretty good, but hot as hell. He also did the upstairs bathroom. My brother is more skilled (he went to masonry school) and can do a number of things well. People tend to not appreciate this kind of expertise these days.
Very nice job MaxPen.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
I particularly like the his and his bathroom sinks. There is nothing worse that sharing a sink and having your dudefriend's facial razor stubble all over the sink. Rob Singer knows what I am talking about with Mrs Singer's beard stubble. :cool:
lol I was just messing with you. It was such an absurd statement I laughed far too much so I had to follow through on the posting.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzNot showing off. Doing a little bonding, maybe. Obviously, the work my brother has done is not as high end as this. That's why I said "very nice!"Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionWhy do you always need to show off bro?Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
I appreciate anyone who can do this kind of work. This kind of skill often goes unappreciated, is my point. My dad dabbled with this, but did not have results anywhere near as polished as what MaxPen did. I spent my teens in an attic my dad converted into a bedroom. Looked pretty good, but hot as hell. He also did the upstairs bathroom. My brother is more skilled (he went to masonry school) and can do a number of things well. People tend to not appreciate this kind of expertise these days.
It is quite nice looking. Whether he could afford to pay someone or not, I like to do things on my own. Learn stuff and such but it takes time. What else is one going to do with their life?
Also even as a first time worker (in whatever particular area), you'll often do better work than the crappy contractors someone finds who just want to do minimum to get it done and out the door
Not sure why this would be looked at as "casinoey", but a reasonably decent job for DIY. My only comment would be to have installed a much nicer toilet, unless this is a women-only bathroom. I can't comfortably sit on one of those little-ass things. My package won't fit without hitting the inside front toilet seat & bowl.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenFinally finished the bathroom project. Had to wait about a month or so to get a special order door in at Lowe's due to shortages and shipping crisis. Didn't want standard height because I hate ducking to get in and out of a shower.
The sinks will provide you many fond memories of you and maxpen shaving together.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJVery nice job MaxPen.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
I particularly like the his and his bathroom sinks. There is nothing worse that sharing a sink and having your dudefriend's facial razor stubble all over the sink. Rob Singer knows what I am talking about with Mrs Singer's beard stubble. :cool:
You just look stupid when you post something like this. Just makes you look more and more like Singer's bitch.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Are you maxpen's bitch or is he your bitch?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJYou just look stupid when you post something like this. Just makes you look more and more like Singer's bitch.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Neither. Maxpen is simply a known AP on this forum, who sometimes agrees with me and at other times has been critical of me. Just so happens we both looked into this Rob Singer character, who you now support and try to enable and we both know and have stated the truth.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmAre you maxpen's bitch or is he your bitch?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJYou just look stupid when you post something like this. Just makes you look more and more like Singer's bitch.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Because of that you have gotten nasty with these sick sexual fantasies of yours. At what age to you old dudes grow up and stop acting like 8 year olds, or is that something you take to the grave with you? :confused:
Here are the facts Mickeycrimm:
Rob Singer is a 20 year gambling forums troll. His whole thing has been one big troll of the gambling community. He is a degenerate gambler who wanted to be an advantage player and failed so he made up these stories of grand wins using progression systems, stop limits, "special plays" and other voodoo theories stacked on top of one another.
These claims defied math and reality and were debunked by every AP and math expert including you! You lead the charge in debunking these claims for years.
When there was no one left that believed these silly magical progression system claims, Singer stole a claim of riches that he read in the news and played his game all over again.
He offered you a truce and because he had kicked your ass for years at the troll game, you accepted and now defend him. So you have to attack me and MaxPen and others who still call out this bullshit as you did for a decade.
That is the whole story in a nutshell and nothing you or Singer says will change it. The rest is all games.
Your post here is a monument to delusional reasoning and has no basis in fact. Seek psychiatric help.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
"monument to delusional reasoning" is a fair term, Mickey.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Regardless of what you or I or anyone may have thought initially, when questioned by 2 different forum owners, Rob tied his playing the double up bug to this fictional, make-believe Newell, claiming that is what he did with the money. No one else did that to him, He did that on his own!
That left proving ownership of the Newell, which he pulled not 1, not 2, not 3, but 4 massive bullshit attempts to con everyone.
1.) the pictures inside a Newell on the dealership floor.
2.) pictures of a completely different Newell that he snuck up on at a campground.
3.) a bill of sale with no company letterhead or logo and all signatures in the same handwriting
and 4.) an ad selling this fantasy Newell with 2 pictures and the sale sight unseen to a make believe buyer from overseas within a few hours.
No one seriously thinks you believe these things. But if you do then yes, it is a monument to delusional reasoning....sadly, yours, old boy.
You have mistaken me for someone that gives a fuck whether Singer had a newell or not. You see, your ass fucking buddy, maxpuke, who I had gotten along with just fine until then, started smearing me over my opinion that Singer probably worked the double up bug. You attacked me too. You both continually attacked me. Over an opinion that had no personal attacks in it?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ"monument to delusional reasoning" is a fair term, Mickey.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Regardless of what you or I or anyone may have thought initially, when questioned by 2 different forum owners, Rob tied his playing the double up bug to this fictional, make-believe Newell, claiming that is what he did with the money. No one else did that to him, He did that on his own!
That left proving ownership of the Newell, which he pulled not 1, not 2, not 3, but 4 massive bullshit attempts to con everyone.
1.) the pictures inside a Newell on the dealership floor.
2.) pictures of a completely different Newell that he snuck up on at a campground.
3.) a bill of sale with no company letterhead or logo and all signatures in the same handwriting
and 4.) an ad selling this fantasy Newell with 2 pictures and the sale sight unseen to a make believe buyer from overseas within a few hours.
No one seriously thinks you believe these things. But if you do then yes, it is a monument to delusional reasoning....sadly, yours, old boy.
What comes around goes around. You two pieces of shit don't like it when I put the shit back on you. You two fairys been sucking each other off. maxpen is your bitch.
You are wrong. Singer made the Newell matter, when he told Dan Druff and Shackleford that he bought the Newell with the money won from the double up play. If he had never said that, the Newell wouldn't matter and would just be an unrelated lie...another Singer lie. But when he said that is what he did with the money, he made the Newell part of this equation.
Everyone sees that but you. And you don't see it because you don't want to see it or more likely, you just can't bring yourself to admit you are wrong. And all your nastiness won't change these facts.
Below is Rob's interview with Shackleford. At the 19:40 mark Wizard asks Rob what proof he has that he made 2.8 million from the double up bug. Shackleford suggests Tax returns and Rob gives the same answer he has given us for several years that he threw out all the tax returns. Rob then volunteers that he "saved all the money won in a safe until he bought the Newell RV in 2011 for 1.6 Million." That is Rob offering up this Newell as proof of the double up bug! He is the one that tied the two together.
I don't know whether Wizard planned it and thought it out ahead of time or it just fell into place, but Wizard set the trap and Rob jumped in when he volunteered, he used the double up money to purchase the Newell.
You can say it doesn't matter and the two have nothing to do with each other, but it does. It became part of the equation when Rob volunteered that info. There are several answers that could have tripped Rob up. Buying Real Estate, depositing the money in a bank account or making a large purchase (like the Newell). All of these would have resulted in some documentation. I think Rob realized that the first two would have been a problem, but didn't seem to realize that a large purchase like 1.6 million dollars would. Shackleford laid the trap and Rob jumped right in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtZAa6H53zo
The only reason kew became so invested in his wanting mickey to care if we had the Newell or not is because kew just cannot STAND it when someone comes along who has the capability of thinking things thru for themself without being completely influenced by kew and his automatic biases.
Kew wants the Newell never to have existed, and he keeps torturing himself by laying out his lies and spins over and over again--insanely believing that if he does it enuf it'll eventually become reality. This is clearly evident in understanding why kew ducked coming over to see the rig for himself when he had the opportunity--and like he kept saying he would do. That would have solved his dilemma once and for all....which also explains why he backed out of doing so. As such--and because he understands the Newell and DU ties--he remains safe from the horrors that come with realizing the truth about my DU years. Of course I used DU money to buy the RV because a purchase like that would have been foolish to make with retirement savings. And naturally, kew and his "Einstein wisdom" wants to think wizard set a "trap" of some sort for who knows why.
While this stuff is getting old, what is still very entertaining is how one can go from forum to forum and either enjoy watching kew get excoriated, ridiculed and exposed for among many things, the incessant need to interject conflict and drama into every aspect of his sad life---or read about how wizard has had his number for a long, long time. Forum rats like kew don't appear every day. Savor it while you can :)
What a pathetic interview by Rusty, total disgrace. He should be ashamed of himself. Other then Rob looking 25 years older then his GOAT Alan interview, he was his usual comedic self. Alan absolutely decimates Rusty as an interviewer, no contest whatsoever !Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
And...here you are still talking about it. Point, game, set, match...winner---Rob Singer.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ"monument to delusional reasoning" is a fair term, Mickey.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Regardless of what you or I or anyone may have thought initially, when questioned by 2 different forum owners, Rob tied his playing the double up bug to this fictional, make-believe Newell, claiming that is what he did with the money. No one else did that to him, He did that on his own!
That left proving ownership of the Newell, which he pulled not 1, not 2, not 3, but 4 massive bullshit attempts to con everyone.
1.) the pictures inside a Newell on the dealership floor.
2.) pictures of a completely different Newell that he snuck up on at a campground.
3.) a bill of sale with no company letterhead or logo and all signatures in the same handwriting
and 4.) an ad selling this fantasy Newell with 2 pictures and the sale sight unseen to a make believe buyer from overseas within a few hours.
No one seriously thinks you believe these things. But if you do then yes, it is a monument to delusional reasoning....sadly, yours, old boy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyWhat a pathetic interview by Rusty, total disgrace. He should be ashamed of himself. Other then Rob looking 25 years older then his GOAT Alan interview, he was his usual comedic self. Alan absolutely decimates Rusty as an interviewer, no contest whatsoever !Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Shackleford did fine if this was an Entertainment Tonight interview, or Jimmy Fallon, and nobody's feelings were supposed to be hurt. On the other hand, since this was somebody claiming to have steamrollered casinos for a million and a half with the double up bug, there were a couple gaps. Like, "Where did you first play it?" comes to mind. That is an obvious starting point question, and there is no real reason for Rob to not answer that question if he's confessing to having used the bug.
If you'll notice, Rob's origin of the DU claim that Alan published on his site lacked any (and I mean ANY) specific details. It was noticeable by its lack of detail. Here's one of many good books that discusses the problem with lack of specificity, especially when information is "volunteered."
https://www.amazon.com/Practical-Int...9322259&sr=8-1
So, a few questions that Shackleford missed. Now bear in mind that someone conducting an interview that will potentially be seen by thousands of people should, in term of any journalism training, at least survey a couple of past interviews with the person for salient points, especially when there ARE ONLY A FEW PAST INTERVIEWS. If you don't do that as an interviewer, you're being lazy. No worse than Jimmy Fallon, but lazy nonetheless.
Here's a couple of obvious questions.
1) Where were the first couple of places you played the DU bug? What did it feel like? How much did you win? (These are really obvious starting points)
2) Was your claim of "machine telepathy" from the Alan interview just nonsense to cover your double up claim, or do you believe that? (The telepathy comment stands out so badly, it has to be addressed, especially by a math/science guy). That question easily leads to the next question.
3) Did you mislead Mendelson with those original interviews? If so, how can we verify that you're not misleading me and the audience in the current interview? What reasons to we have to believe you?
4) Where was the final place you played the DU bug? How much did you win? How did it feel to stop? Did you know that was your final time playing it as you played it?
And finally, the idea that Rob never told his family members, but then just magically made $1.6 million appear to buy a Newell -- well, that deserves some follow up questions or comments. Like, (5) "How did you explain the sudden million and a half available for luxury items to your family?" The problem with this follow-up (for Rob) is that he'd have to answer with something suggesting it wasn't surprising to his family. That likely means Rob would have to offer further details like these chunks of money appeared to his family before for other reasons. The problem with that answer is that you can then ask, "Like when?" and Rob would have to provide a detail of when and where a million showed up out of the blue previously.
Rob would have to report that he never told his family about the DU until the end. The question would then be why he didn't tell them. That makes it seem as if (A) Rob didn't trust his family to keep a lid on it or (B) Rob was concerned with legal ramifications. If he was concerned with legal ramifications, then you get into Rob having to be the only person with access to the safe. Otherwise the family is also on the hook legally. It's a real slippery slope, that money-in-the-safe bit.
And, finally, since Rob reported before his DU bug claim that the DU was illegal (on this very forum, I believe), Shackleford could have asked (6) why would you publicly state that you felt the DU was illegal when you were doing it? What sense does that make? Doesn't that undermine your whole story?
These are pretty straightforward and obvious questions most interviewers with a journalism background of any kind would have asked. I think most halfway interested people would have asked them. So it's striking that they didn't get asked.
Now, as far as mickey believing Rob did the DU bug, the easy way to clean that whole bit up would be for mickey to interview Rob on camera and ask the questions just listed above. Rob would have a non-adversarial interviewer, and I would pick up the tab for that interview, which would then be put on YouTube.
After removing the link, Singer's lead increases by 741 words. I guess more if you count my post, but I'm just offering play by play.
Also, there are some who say that those who give specifics are more likely to be lying. I just assume everything that I am told is a lie and then try to prove the null hypothesis if I care enough; it's much easier.
Finally, now that I've actually read the post, the questions in #3 are terrible...you don't put someone at ease by making them feel like they are being challenged. You also wouldn't frame the question like that at all; it would be more like, "I'm sure there are people out there who would doubt what you're saying; is anything about this verifiable?"
It's all about tone and phrasing. The phrasing puts people at ease so they are responding from the position of thinking the interviewer is on their side. Even if they go into the interview knowing the interviewer is NOT on their side, the phrasing is a deliberate psychological trick to cause a more general openness in a person's answer.
An interview can be an interrogation, but not if you're openly trying to interrogate.
Let me craft Rob's response.
"I don't need to prove myself to you or anyone. Penis, queer, homo, nigger, penis."
I added to my previous post. I don't imagine anyone cares, but just in case.
I said it was highly likely Singer worked the double up bug. Prove my opinion wrong. You've had what, over two years to do it. And you still haven't proven a fucking thing. Whether Singer had a newell or not does not prove or disprove whether he worked the double up bug or not. And all YOUR nastiness won't change that fact. You stupid bitch. Repeat, whether Singer bought a newell or not does not prove or disprove he worked the double up bug. Damn, you are dense.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
LMAOQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
This is a prime example of why it is pointless to try and reason with a hobo. It's best to just crush them and let them go hide under the bridge next time they see you coming to cross.
I find it hilarious that redietz is talking about "lack of information" to a bunch of AP's who always provide a lack of information about themselves. LOL!Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by OzzyWhat a pathetic interview by Rusty, total disgrace. He should be ashamed of himself. Other then Rob looking 25 years older then his GOAT Alan interview, he was his usual comedic self. Alan absolutely decimates Rusty as an interviewer, no contest whatsoever !Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Shackleford did fine if this was an Entertainment Tonight interview, or Jimmy Fallon, and nobody's feelings were supposed to be hurt. On the other hand, since this was somebody claiming to have steamrollered casinos for a million and a half with the double up bug, there were a couple gaps. Like, "Where did you first play it?" comes to mind. That is an obvious starting point question, and there is no real reason for Rob to not answer that question if he's confessing to having used the bug.
If you'll notice, Rob's origin of the DU claim that Alan published on his site lacked any (and I mean ANY) specific details. It was noticeable by its lack of detail. Here's one of many good books that discusses the problem with lack of specificity, especially when information is "volunteered."
https://www.amazon.com/Practical-Int...9322259&sr=8-1
So, a few questions that Shackleford missed. Now bear in mind that someone conducting an interview that will potentially be seen by thousands of people should, in term of any journalism training, at least survey a couple of past interviews with the person for salient points, especially when there ARE ONLY A FEW PAST INTERVIEWS. If you don't do that as an interviewer, you're being lazy. No worse than Jimmy Fallon, but lazy nonetheless.
Here's a couple of obvious questions.
1) Where were the first couple of places you played the DU bug? What did it feel like? How much did you win? (These are really obvious starting points)
2) Was your claim of "machine telepathy" from the Alan interview just nonsense to cover your double up claim, or do you believe that? (The telepathy comment stands out so badly, it has to be addressed, especially by a math/science guy). That question easily leads to the next question.
3) Did you mislead Mendelson with those original interviews? If so, how can we verify that you're not misleading me and the audience in the current interview? What reasons to we have to believe you?
4) Where was the final place you played the DU bug? How much did you win? How did it feel to stop? Did you know that was your final time playing it as you played it?
And finally, the idea that Rob never told his family members, but then just magically made $1.6 million appear to buy a Newell -- well, that deserves some follow up questions or comments. Like, (5) "How did you explain the sudden million and a half available for luxury items to your family?" The problem with this follow-up (for Rob) is that he'd have to answer with something suggesting it wasn't surprising to his family. That likely means Rob would have to offer further details like these chunks of money appeared to his family before for other reasons. The problem with that answer is that you can then ask, "Like when?" and Rob would have to provide a detail of when and where a million showed up out of the blue previously.
Rob would have to report that he never told his family about the DU until the end. The question would then be why he didn't tell them. That makes it seem as if (A) Rob didn't trust his family to keep a lid on it or (B) Rob was concerned with legal ramifications. If he was concerned with legal ramifications, then you get into Rob having to be the only person with access to the safe. Otherwise the family is also on the hook legally. It's a real slippery slope, that money-in-the-safe bit.
And, finally, since Rob reported before his DU bug claim that the DU was illegal (on this very forum, I believe), Shackleford could have asked (6) why would you publicly state that you felt the DU was illegal when you were doing it? What sense does that make? Doesn't that undermine your whole story?
These are pretty straightforward and obvious questions most interviewers with a journalism background of any kind would have asked. I think most halfway interested people would have asked them. So it's striking that they didn't get asked.
Now, as far as mickey believing Rob did the DU bug, the easy way to clean that whole bit up would be for mickey to interview Rob on camera and ask the questions just listed above. Rob would have a non-adversarial interviewer, and I would pick up the tab for that interview, which would then be put on YouTube.
redietz premise that the family didn't know about the money is also faulty. I think Singer already told us that his wife thought he was a video poker god because of all the money rolling in. IIRC, they thought he was working his progression the whole time. Then he confessed to them that he made the money a different way after the statute of limitations ran out. I think he wrote that here.
Also, I can't remember where it's at but Singer progression strategy was published in full. It's around here somewhere but I can't remember where. And as for details on the double up he provided plenty of details. For starters, he knew the published sequence was wrong and even published the correct sequence. He had specific knowledge of which machines it worked on and the various denoms that could be found on those machines. I think he knew the exact years the machines had to be manufactured.
I've been in the same forums with Singer longer than anyone here. I think it goes back to about 2005 or 2006. I remembered that he announced his retirement from "professional video poker" in 2009 just after the two dumbos got busted working the DU. I think its more than coincidence. Singer's retirement in that time frame, along with the details he put up about the play, is what tilted me to thinking he probably did work it. Who would want to go back to the progression play after the easy money DU? And with someone getting busted for it, if it were me, I would want to bug out. I'm not 100% positive he worked it because I wasn't there. None of us know 100% if he worked it or not. But I think it likely that he did.
I voiced my opinion and thought that would be it. I never expected the vicious attacks by maxpen and KJ, both of whom I was pretty much allied with up until that time. Their continued attacks/brow beating hasn't worked for them and won't. I still hold the same opinion. It's a sad commentary that they chose to make an enemy out of me over an opinion that was no skin off of either of their backs.
PS: It's redietz idea for an "interrogation" of Singer so its probably best that he conducts it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI find it hilarious that redietz is talking about "lack of information" to a bunch of AP's who always provide a lack of information about themselves. LOL!Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
Shackleford did fine if this was an Entertainment Tonight interview, or Jimmy Fallon, and nobody's feelings were supposed to be hurt. On the other hand, since this was somebody claiming to have steamrollered casinos for a million and a half with the double up bug, there were a couple gaps. Like, "Where did you first play it?" comes to mind. That is an obvious starting point question, and there is no real reason for Rob to not answer that question if he's confessing to having used the bug.
If you'll notice, Rob's origin of the DU claim that Alan published on his site lacked any (and I mean ANY) specific details. It was noticeable by its lack of detail. Here's one of many good books that discusses the problem with lack of specificity, especially when information is "volunteered."
https://www.amazon.com/Practical-Int...9322259&sr=8-1
So, a few questions that Shackleford missed. Now bear in mind that someone conducting an interview that will potentially be seen by thousands of people should, in term of any journalism training, at least survey a couple of past interviews with the person for salient points, especially when there ARE ONLY A FEW PAST INTERVIEWS. If you don't do that as an interviewer, you're being lazy. No worse than Jimmy Fallon, but lazy nonetheless.
Here's a couple of obvious questions.
1) Where were the first couple of places you played the DU bug? What did it feel like? How much did you win? (These are really obvious starting points)
2) Was your claim of "machine telepathy" from the Alan interview just nonsense to cover your double up claim, or do you believe that? (The telepathy comment stands out so badly, it has to be addressed, especially by a math/science guy). That question easily leads to the next question.
3) Did you mislead Mendelson with those original interviews? If so, how can we verify that you're not misleading me and the audience in the current interview? What reasons to we have to believe you?
4) Where was the final place you played the DU bug? How much did you win? How did it feel to stop? Did you know that was your final time playing it as you played it?
And finally, the idea that Rob never told his family members, but then just magically made $1.6 million appear to buy a Newell -- well, that deserves some follow up questions or comments. Like, (5) "How did you explain the sudden million and a half available for luxury items to your family?" The problem with this follow-up (for Rob) is that he'd have to answer with something suggesting it wasn't surprising to his family. That likely means Rob would have to offer further details like these chunks of money appeared to his family before for other reasons. The problem with that answer is that you can then ask, "Like when?" and Rob would have to provide a detail of when and where a million showed up out of the blue previously.
Rob would have to report that he never told his family about the DU until the end. The question would then be why he didn't tell them. That makes it seem as if (A) Rob didn't trust his family to keep a lid on it or (B) Rob was concerned with legal ramifications. If he was concerned with legal ramifications, then you get into Rob having to be the only person with access to the safe. Otherwise the family is also on the hook legally. It's a real slippery slope, that money-in-the-safe bit.
And, finally, since Rob reported before his DU bug claim that the DU was illegal (on this very forum, I believe), Shackleford could have asked (6) why would you publicly state that you felt the DU was illegal when you were doing it? What sense does that make? Doesn't that undermine your whole story?
These are pretty straightforward and obvious questions most interviewers with a journalism background of any kind would have asked. I think most halfway interested people would have asked them. So it's striking that they didn't get asked.
Now, as far as mickey believing Rob did the DU bug, the easy way to clean that whole bit up would be for mickey to interview Rob on camera and ask the questions just listed above. Rob would have a non-adversarial interviewer, and I would pick up the tab for that interview, which would then be put on YouTube.
redietz premise that the family didn't know about the money is also faulty. I think Singer already told us that his wife thought he was a video poker god because of all the money rolling in. IIRC, they thought he was working his progression the whole time. Then he confessed to them that he made the money a different way after the statute of limitations ran out. I think he wrote that here.
Also, I can't remember where it's at but Singer progression strategy was published in full. It's around here somewhere but I can't remember where. And as for details on the double up he provided plenty of details. For starters, he knew the published sequence was wrong and even published the correct sequence. He had specific knowledge of which machines it worked on and the various denoms that could be found on those machines. I think he knew the exact years the machines had to be manufactured.
I've been in the same forums with Singer longer than anyone here. I think it goes back to about 2005 or 2006. I remembered that he announced his retirement from "professional video poker" in 2009 just after the two dumbos got busted working the DU. I think its more than coincidence. Singer's retirement in that time frame, along with the details he put up about the play, is what tilted me to thinking he probably did work it. Who would want to go back to the progression play after the easy money DU? And with someone getting busted for it, if it were me, I would want to bug out. I'm not 100% positive he worked it because I wasn't there. None of us know 100% if he worked it or not. But I think it likely that he did.
I voiced my opinion and thought that would be it. I never expected the vicious attacks by maxpen and KJ, both of whom I was pretty much allied with up until that time. Their continued attacks/brow beating hasn't worked for them and won't. I still hold the same opinion. It's a sad commentary that they chose to make an enemy out of me over an opinion that was no skin off of either of their backs.
PS: It's redietz idea for an "interrogation" of Singer so its probably best that he conducts it.
There are no details in the piece published on Mendelson's site and then pulled. That was written by Rob for the public as a formal piece, and nothing was offered. Why he would fail to provide any details for the widest audience, I cannot tell you.
As to the questions enumerated above, the questions I listed are all pathetically obvious. They are literally the first things that come to mind for anyone. Any journalism freshman would ask them. So I guess I'm wondering, mickey, why you haven't asked them.
I have. Over and over and OVER again. The latest last night.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I give you facts but you refuse to believe.
Facts are:
The guy claims to have won 2.8 million from double up bug and another 400k from a progression system and both he and his wife had well paying government jobs in aerospace industry and for the government for 30+ years.
And yet: He has no money. He owns no property. He has never owned any property. At age 72 he lives off his children and spends 6 months a year living in a small pull behind camper/trailer.
And while there is no record of any assets including real estate owned, there are evictions, bankruptcies and judgements against on his permanent record. I won't even consider the food stamp abuse since it has been removed.
The man is simply a degenerate gambler who lost whatever money he had and his retirement plan now consists of living off his kids. And like all degenerate gamblers he has stories to tell that don't match his financial reality.
I have led you right to the edge of the stream mickey. Nothing I can do if you refuse to take a drink of water and die of thirst.
As weird as you are, you are somewhat on the right track here. But that's only because you are coming up this stuff 100% after the fact.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by OzzyWhat a pathetic interview by Rusty, total disgrace. He should be ashamed of himself. Other then Rob looking 25 years older then his GOAT Alan interview, he was his usual comedic self. Alan absolutely decimates Rusty as an interviewer, no contest whatsoever !Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Shackleford did fine if this was an Entertainment Tonight interview, or Jimmy Fallon, and nobody's feelings were supposed to be hurt. On the other hand, since this was somebody claiming to have steamrollered casinos for a million and a half with the double up bug, there were a couple gaps. Like, "Where did you first play it?" comes to mind. That is an obvious starting point question, and there is no real reason for Rob to not answer that question if he's confessing to having used the bug.
If you'll notice, Rob's origin of the DU claim that Alan published on his site lacked any (and I mean ANY) specific details. It was noticeable by its lack of detail. Here's one of many good books that discusses the problem with lack of specificity, especially when information is "volunteered."
https://www.amazon.com/Practical-Int...9322259&sr=8-1
So, a few questions that Shackleford missed. Now bear in mind that someone conducting an interview that will potentially be seen by thousands of people should, in term of any journalism training, at least survey a couple of past interviews with the person for salient points, especially when there ARE ONLY A FEW PAST INTERVIEWS. If you don't do that as an interviewer, you're being lazy. No worse than Jimmy Fallon, but lazy nonetheless.
Here's a couple of obvious questions.
1) Where were the first couple of places you played the DU bug? What did it feel like? How much did you win? (These are really obvious starting points)
2) Was your claim of "machine telepathy" from the Alan interview just nonsense to cover your double up claim, or do you believe that? (The telepathy comment stands out so badly, it has to be addressed, especially by a math/science guy). That question easily leads to the next question.
3) Did you mislead Mendelson with those original interviews? If so, how can we verify that you're not misleading me and the audience in the current interview? What reasons to we have to believe you?
4) Where was the final place you played the DU bug? How much did you win? How did it feel to stop? Did you know that was your final time playing it as you played it?
And finally, the idea that Rob never told his family members, but then just magically made $1.6 million appear to buy a Newell -- well, that deserves some follow up questions or comments. Like, (5) "How did you explain the sudden million and a half available for luxury items to your family?" The problem with this follow-up (for Rob) is that he'd have to answer with something suggesting it wasn't surprising to his family. That likely means Rob would have to offer further details like these chunks of money appeared to his family before for other reasons. The problem with that answer is that you can then ask, "Like when?" and Rob would have to provide a detail of when and where a million showed up out of the blue previously.
Rob would have to report that he never told his family about the DU until the end. The question would then be why he didn't tell them. That makes it seem as if (A) Rob didn't trust his family to keep a lid on it or (B) Rob was concerned with legal ramifications. If he was concerned with legal ramifications, then you get into Rob having to be the only person with access to the safe. Otherwise the family is also on the hook legally. It's a real slippery slope, that money-in-the-safe bit.
And, finally, since Rob reported before his DU bug claim that the DU was illegal (on this very forum, I believe), Shackleford could have asked (6) why would you publicly state that you felt the DU was illegal when you were doing it? What sense does that make? Doesn't that undermine your whole story?
These are pretty straightforward and obvious questions most interviewers with a journalism background of any kind would have asked. I think most halfway interested people would have asked them. So it's striking that they didn't get asked.
Now, as far as mickey believing Rob did the DU bug, the easy way to clean that whole bit up would be for mickey to interview Rob on camera and ask the questions just listed above. Rob would have a non-adversarial interviewer, and I would pick up the tab for that interview, which would then be put on YouTube.
ANY questions would have been fine, because when you're talking about history and not making it up on the go, it's easy. I'll even answer your questions here.
1. Perhaps wizard didn't ask where the first place I discovered the bug because, unlike you, he read about that topic pre-interview on this forum. Yet, WTF does "where first?" matter anyway?
2. Again, how many times must I explain that the various odd allegations I made about the machines over the years were nothing more than attempts at "minds occupation" for my own reasons, while covering as many bases as I felt comfortable covering along the way. And NO ONE could understand this unless they possessed two things: had the classroom training I went through, and we're able to walk in my shoes 24/7 from 2004 to 2019.
3. This is a stupid question. People will believe what they want to believe, and when it comes to me on forums, by and large most want to believe what their hate leads them to believe, or how their jealousy over my extremely stable and successful personal life as well as my overall interjection of myself into the video poker/gambling world, guides them from there.
4. Once again, this has all been answered here prior to the interview. Obviously it was disappointing to have to stop. And even more obviously, how could I have POSSIBLY known my last time playing it was my last time playing it, when I played it!?
I didn't tell my family until I told you folks. I said that before. Not wanting to beleaguer the point, but I have extensive training in when, how, and why to keep my mouth shut, and if you tell anybody until you're safe doing so then you're too weak to even trust yourself. You people want to psycho_analyze this just as kew does with basically everything about me. Better if you treat yourselves to an intensive reading with comprehension program.
I said the DU play was illegal because of the way Kane and Nestor played it. Using a pre-existing winner that you didn't gamble to get is in my mind, illegal.
Finally, wizard wasn't interested in some sort of interrogation. If you can't figure out why he held the interview then you'll never understand any of this.
BumpQuote:
Originally Posted by Mission146And...here you are still talking about it. Point, game, set, match...winner---Rob Singer.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ"monument to delusional reasoning" is a fair term, Mickey.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Regardless of what you or I or anyone may have thought initially, when questioned by 2 different forum owners, Rob tied his playing the double up bug to this fictional, make-believe Newell, claiming that is what he did with the money. No one else did that to him, He did that on his own!
That left proving ownership of the Newell, which he pulled not 1, not 2, not 3, but 4 massive bullshit attempts to con everyone.
1.) the pictures inside a Newell on the dealership floor.
2.) pictures of a completely different Newell that he snuck up on at a campground.
3.) a bill of sale with no company letterhead or logo and all signatures in the same handwriting
and 4.) an ad selling this fantasy Newell with 2 pictures and the sale sight unseen to a make believe buyer from overseas within a few hours.
No one seriously thinks you believe these things. But if you do then yes, it is a monument to delusional reasoning....sadly, yours, old boy.
By the way red, if you or anyone else wants to "interrogate" me on the DU issue, there's no problem. I just won't answer the same stuff we've discussed and I've answered multiple times. But I'll be more than obliging to explain the most important part of all this: how the entire thing works in every scenario. And that's because there is no one who knows the guts of how to make this play better than me. Anywhere.
One last comment: read and re-read everything mickey's had to say about why he believes it's more likely than not that I put down this play. He doesn't use emotion; he's explained himself very well. And believe me, if he simply went on emotion then he'd be just as blind as the automatic critics. Also, if certain people REALLY didn't believe me and they are using whether or not we bought the RV as their barometer, then them backing out of the chance to see it as I was selling it--as they continuously vowed they would do--should tell you and everybody else what they really felt.
The obvious answer is I'm not a journalism student. So my question is why would you mistake me for a journalism student? But here's a clue. One thing you might not remember is I talked to Rob over the phone for probably an hour about the DUB. I don't recall the entire conversation but do recall parts of it. But, in short, I have more information on the details of the play than you guys do.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Question 1: For casinos, in the Shack interview, Rob mentioned Mara Lago where the play worked on all their game kings. And he mentioned the Mirage where it worked on only one machine.
Question 2)The "machine telepathy" question is irrelevant to Singer's progressive strategy and also to the DUB.
Question 3: Showing Mendelson his progressive strategy was not misleading Mendelson about the strategy itself. According to Singer, he put the progressive strategy on hold when he found the DUB. That doesn't mean he considered the strategy to really be a loser. I personally have always thought, and I've said it here more than once going back years ago, that Rob truly believes his progressive strategy works. So I don't get the Mendelson spiel that Rob defrauded him.
Question 4. I don't know the last casino Rob worked the DUB play but he did tell me the last casino he intended to play it, but went there and found out they wouldn't turn on the double up anymore. He also told me of the information he received from an employee there about why they wouldn't turn the double up on anymore. I'm not giving names because Rob hasn't made that public that I know of.
Unbelievable. How do you know someone you only know from this forum has no money, owns no property and has never owned property. You are just super frickin' loopy. You really need to lay off that LSD laced water you're drinking.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI have. Over and over and OVER again. The latest last night.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I give you facts but you refuse to believe.
Facts are:
The guy claims to have won 2.8 million from double up bug and another 400k from a progression system and both he and his wife had well paying government jobs in aerospace industry and for the government for 30+ years.
And yet: He has no money. He owns no property. He has never owned any property. At age 72 he lives off his children and spends 6 months a year living in a small pull behind camper/trailer.
And while there is no record of any assets including real estate owned, there are evictions, bankruptcies and judgements against on his permanent record. I won't even consider the food stamp abuse since it has been removed.
The man is simply a degenerate gambler who lost whatever money he had and his retirement plan now consists of living off his kids. And like all degenerate gamblers he has stories to tell that don't match his financial reality.
I have led you right to the edge of the stream mickey. Nothing I can do if you refuse to take a drink of water and die of thirst.
Why do you have to call names. Just proves you are nothing but another low life despite being a top AP.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I know him because I looked him up! In case you have forgotten it is 2021. This kind of info is available on anyone. Hell people found info on me in the last few weeks. Only difference was to their dismay it confirmed my claims where as everything available on Singer contradicts almost everything he claims.
It is what it is Mickey. It's 2021 and anyone making up the fantasy crap that a Singer or MDawg does will be found out and exposed.
Once again you are long on innuendo and....not just short on facts, you have no facts at all. Just false premises you conjure up to back up fantastical arguments. Give it a break.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWhy do you have to call names. Just proves you are nothing but another low life despite being a top AP.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I know him because I looked him up! In case you have forgotten it is 2021. This kind of info is available on anyone. Hell people found info on me in the last few weeks. Only difference was to their dismay it confirmed my claims where as everything available on Singer contradicts almost everything he claims.
It is what it is Mickey. It's 2021 and anyone making up the fantasy crap that a Singer or MDawg does will be found out and exposed.
I just have to add the obvious, once again. You know, everything I post about Rob is obvious.
One reason someone like Rob wants to deflect where he played something the first time, and the last time, is that any specifics could potentially be traced. They would be giveaways -- was he at that location at that time? Was the DU bug actually available at those locations at those times? Rob avoids all specifics. There's no reason to avoid them if the stories are true. Now if it's all fairy tales, then specifics have all kinds of problems attached to them.
But anyone with half a brain knows this stuff.
Nobody who actually read Rob's DU origin story on the Mendelson site, written by Rob, was going to walk away believing it.
True dummy. I've posted on this forum where I first discovered the bug. So instead of claiming "Deflection! Deflection!"---if this irrelevant info is so important to your weird purpose here, JUST LOOK IT UP.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Kew, you're well known for creating chaos, conflict and drama with your lies and crazy spins on forums. Everyone already knows why you ran for Brokeback Mountain instead of coming over here to see the Newell first hand. Now let's see you post a single piece of evidence that I've never owned property, that I currently don't own property, that our retirement account doesn't have 7-figures because we "are broke", that I've lost money because I'm a "degenerate gambler", we live "off of our children", and that we spend "6 months a year living in a small camper". Oh....and your previous claims of my "welfare fraud" and "food stamps fraud".
You're fabricating every one of these lies simply because I don't believe anything you say about you being a supposed "bj pro who wins every year", and my labeling you as a confused soft noodle with crossed wires upstairs who loves getting rammed up the ass and then licking the chocolate stick.
Wise up, idiots.
Look the food stamp thing has been removed. i acknowledge that. I don't know if that is due to you asking to have it removed or it just fell off after x amount of years (which I suspect is the case). Either way, that is off the table.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
The other info, I can't post and you know it. When someone looks up this kind of information, they agree with the site providing the information not to publicly disclose it. More importantly most forums, including this one has a policy against me posting that info. I can post what I found but not copies of info. And Dan Druff enforced that against me just recently with Mdawg.
So all I can really do is post a recap of what I found and sort of direct others to look for themselves. And that is what I did.
And others, whether based on my steering them in the right direction, or on their own have also looked and done their own investigating and found the same info. This stuff is basically public information Rob. I know because it was used against me in the last month. It is 2021 and that is the way things are. Information is available. So anyone like you or this Mdawg that makes claims that are way out there and complete nonsense will be exposed. That is just the way it is old fella.
Who are the others? When did any others disclose that they found the same info?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Look it up for yourself troll. I am not finding anything already posted for the likes of a troll like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyWho are the others? When did any others disclose that they found the same info?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
So you have nothing but excuses and nothing to back up your lies. Hmmm....isn't this the EXACT same thing your sorry ass is getting reemed for on that other forum right about now?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJLook the food stamp thing has been removed. i acknowledge that. I don't know if that is due to you asking to have it removed or it just fell off after x amount of years (which I suspect is the case). Either way, that is off the table.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
The other info, I can't post and you know it. When someone looks up this kind of information, they agree with the site providing the information not to publicly disclose it. More importantly most forums, including this one has a policy against me posting that info. I can post what I found but not copies of info. And Dan Druff enforced that against me just recently with Mdawg.
So all I can really do is post a recap of what I found and sort of direct others to look for themselves. And that is what I did.
And others, whether based on my steering them in the right direction, or on their own have also looked and done their own investigating and found the same info. This stuff is basically public information Rob. I know because it was used against me in the last month. It is 2021 and that is the way things are. Information is available. So anyone like you or this Mdawg that makes claims that are way out there and complete nonsense will be exposed. That is just the way it is old fella.
Who else but kew could get caught telling lies ON TWO DIFFERENT FORUMS ABOUT TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE AT THE SAME TIME!? And you compound those lies with more lies about yourself! Am I right in suggesting that only a homo with a set of crossed wires upstairs could accomplish such a remarkable feat?
If you're thinking about faking your own death again in order to escape your humiliation, I'd rather get a good 'ol belly-laugh if you actually ended up eating dirt this time around.
Please....Pretty Please??