Printable View
LOL...you had no problem assigning 180 million in Bitcoin to MDawg, then repeating that 10 times.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Looks like a new member made a common mistake using the quote feature, nothing purposeful.
Rules for he, but not for re.
No, it is a glitch in my editing skills. That was kewlj, not you. Mea culpa.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyLOL...you had no problem assigning 180 million in Bitcoin to MDawg, then repeating that 10 times.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Looks like a new member made a common mistake using the quote feature, nothing purposeful.
Rules for he, but not for re.
Go ahead and do the math on the bitcoin claim, coach. Not being a lawyer and rarely using one (17 arrests, no convictions), I was using someone else's legal fee estimates. I erred well on the conservative side. Way, way on the conservative side.
But let us know what you come up with.
Your boy gotcha'ed himself with the bitcoins, buddy.
I estimate that you inflated his holdings by a factor of 30.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Oh in a forum sense do you have integrity and in a non forum sense do you have integrity?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission146In the Forum sense, do you have integrity?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
You get Nuked, then shit on him----understandable...though not quite to the extent with a 500 page fucking reference book where 499 of the pages are a carbon copy of the first.
He lets you back on the site---it's a testament to his character, according to you.
Things don't go your way---you start shitting on him again.
I mean, you either have a read on someone's character, or you don't. I think you have no read. So, two things:
1.) Why not copy your posts here and go post them on WoV, verbatim, and take your Nuke. (After you're unbanned). Most people seem to like going out that way rather than whatever the fuck you're doing is called.
2.) Face reality: Wizard means so much more to you than you ever will to him. Stop being fucking pathetic. It's fucking disgraceful. I remember when I looked up to you and looked forward to reading your posts, and I hope that can happen again one day, even if it's not on WoV.
I'll answer for you. NO and NO. You're probably sucking WON's dick and can't speak at the moment.
Bbbwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh so the wizard give the mdawg his seal of approvals and the kewlj gonna short circuit and wobble out of control, hey hey.
In what universe did that happen? :confused: Please point me to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by soxfan
I'd have also answered no to both. I don't need you to answer for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesday
I don't suck dick, but even if I did, at least I still wouldn't have to pay to get laid.
Are "sucking dick" and "getting laid" a false equivalence?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission146
You're asking the wrong guy. I've never sucked a dick before, so I don't know how I'd look at it.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Either way, I don't have to pay to have someone get near my genitals, or to let me get near theirs, was the point.
I don't get the Gay Jokes towards People who are Straight....
I wasn't joking, Tasha, I was serious.
Seems to me that a blow job isn't equivalent to getting laid.
Oh sure, you still spurt but really it's not the same as grinding against someone.
Heck, in some parts a BJ is equivalent to a good night kiss, or so they say.
Fucking some girl's vagina or giving it to her up the ass is getting laid; a blow job doesn't even come close (pun intended).
There, glad that's settled.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgSo what are you doing here? You seem to be posting. Publicly. Again.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
I thought we wouldn't. See you. On these forums. Again.
Let the chips fall where they may.
You might know who we are, but we know who you are. Understand?
Dude, over 100 people who post on these forums know who I am. Many I shared it with and consider friends even if we disagree on some things. Other who screen shotted my doxxing and I insulted on here and others who figured it out. I’m not worried and even share it with some who ask. I am fully armed and live in a gated community with 1 Stanley Cup winning player from last year and a nationally known sheriff in Florida.
Anyone who shared it with you is either the doxxer, which I doubt, or someone who doesn’t like how I act.
Either way, I believe my guy is on to you, or I wasted my money. Which is far less than Oz spent. What I do with the info when and if I get it is still up to me. But keep thinking you have something on me.
If and when I put out my recommendation on your firm, I can assure you it will be with my name for those few who don’t know who I am. And obviously after determining if they are the right firm for my situation.
And please feel free to come at me my friend. I’ll live, or I won’t.
And by the way, anyone who wants to dox me on here, feel free to put it out there.
Love ya MDawg!
Heterosexual men don't like being called gay. It's a huge insult. That's the purpose of doing it. To insult the person.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
I don't know who's following any of it at WoV, but I see that MDawg reported a couple of days ago that he had a -68K session.
Being the eternal cynic, my immediate reaction is that (1) either The Boz created a situation for him that MDawg is trying to defuse or (2) somebody from the boards watched the session, so MDawg had no real choice but to report it.
I'm such a cynic, eh? It's sad.
I REALLY hate to say this, but you're coming across as being creepily obsessed with Mdawg....:/Quote:
Originally Posted by The BozQuote:
Originally Posted by MDawgSo what are you doing here? You seem to be posting. Publicly. Again.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
I thought we wouldn't. See you. On these forums. Again.
Let the chips fall where they may.
You might know who we are, but we know who you are. Understand?
Dude, over 100 people who post on these forums know who I am. Many I shared it with and consider friends even if we disagree on some things. Other who screen shotted my doxxing and I insulted on here and others who figured it out. I’m not worried and even share it with some who ask. I am fully armed and live in a gated community with 1 Stanley Cup winning player from last year and a nationally known sheriff in Florida.
Anyone who shared it with you is either the doxxer, which I doubt, or someone who doesn’t like how I act.
Either way, I believe my guy is on to you, or I wasted my money. Which is far less than Oz spent. What I do with the info when and if I get it is still up to me. But keep thinking you have something on me.
If and when I put out my recommendation on your firm, I can assure you it will be with my name for those few who don’t know who I am. And obviously after determining if they are the right firm for my situation.
And please feel free to come at me my friend. I’ll live, or I won’t.
And by the way, anyone who wants to dox me on here, feel free to put it out there.
Love ya MDawg!
I really hate to say this, but you're a pretty creepy person...... :DQuote:
Originally Posted by TashaI REALLY hate to say this, but you're coming across as being creepily obsessed with Mdawg....:/Quote:
Originally Posted by The BozQuote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Dude, over 100 people who post on these forums know who I am. Many I shared it with and consider friends even if we disagree on some things. Other who screen shotted my doxxing and I insulted on here and others who figured it out. I’m not worried and even share it with some who ask. I am fully armed and live in a gated community with 1 Stanley Cup winning player from last year and a nationally known sheriff in Florida.
Anyone who shared it with you is either the doxxer, which I doubt, or someone who doesn’t like how I act.
Either way, I believe my guy is on to you, or I wasted my money. Which is far less than Oz spent. What I do with the info when and if I get it is still up to me. But keep thinking you have something on me.
If and when I put out my recommendation on your firm, I can assure you it will be with my name for those few who don’t know who I am. And obviously after determining if they are the right firm for my situation.
And please feel free to come at me my friend. I’ll live, or I won’t.
And by the way, anyone who wants to dox me on here, feel free to put it out there.
Love ya MDawg!
I actually told someone that Mdawg will have a big losing session soon after someone posted that video of a guy losing 300k. So there's that. Carry on.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
If my son were in my legal firm and had been telling tall and potentially embarrassing tales, I would order his alter ego to report a mammoth loss and go from there. That would be the quickest way to deflate the issue. It doesn't matter if the alter ego had reported winning 40 of 41 or 50 of 51 or whatever, once that minus 68K report hits the forum posts, the hypothesis of recruiting investors and hint of impropriety pretty much goes out the legal window.
I don't know anything about this guy being an attorney or not. Is that the way the legal profession woks today...attorneys working out of a hotel suite in Vegas for months at a time, instead of the long hours at the firm? :confused:
I have no idea, nor care. My gut tells me that too is bullshit, but I suppose it could be. Part of that gut feeling is just knowing that he has lied about so many other things, including the repeated lie about my results last year. It is like I said, if a guy is going to repeatedly lie about stupid shit that everyone knows is a lie, it becomes hard to believe anything he states.....that is what credibility is. But I couldn't care less about the attorney thing.
Like Axel, I was expecting report of a big loss. I figured that might be followed by some good size wins in the coming days that offset that loss. That has been the pattern, but suspect that could change with me mentioning it. We'll see.
The reason I though there might be a big loss coming is the pattern is always the same with these guys. When it gets to the point that very few are left believing their nonsense, or even responding to "the great adventure" that we have now reached with this Mdawg, these guys ALWAYS need to escalate their claims in an attempt to once again generate the attention they crave.
It was at that point in the Singer chronicles (no one left believing his claims) that Rob Singer came up with the double up bug, and then later the Newell claim. These guys HAVE to escalate. It is built into the narcissist mentality. They simply can't avoid it it.
Quite frankly, the 2021 Vegas thread, a trip report at WoV by TinMan, is 1000 times more believable and relatable. That is what a trip report should be.
Actually, the storyline that was coming is that he took those $6000 promo chips generated by the big loss that he has been mentioning and won back most of that big loss. Anyone could see that a mile a way. :cool: He is going to have to come up with a new story now. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Sorry to have to tell you this, KJ, but you are on the very bottom of a long list of people that have refuted Singer's claims over the years. He was banned from publishing his strategy on vpFREE back in about 2004. There were lots of people that refuted Rob's claims on every forum he ever pushed it on. In 16 years I've seen only a couple of people that ever took his strategy seriously. It was always Singer against the world. So for you to say that he only ran out of believers in the past year is not correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
True. Most were true A/P, long term players and could not fathom a short term, win goal oriented strategy.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmSorry to have to tell you this, KJ, but you are on the very bottom of a long list of people that have refuted Singer's claims over the years. He was banned from publishing his strategy on vpFREE back in about 2004. There were lots of people that refuted Rob's claims on every forum he ever pushed it on. In 16 years I've seen only a couple of people that ever took his strategy seriously. It was always Singer against the world. So for you to say that he only ran out of believers in the past year is not correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Word salads like "short term, win-oriented-goals" may be popular with motivational speakers, but they don't do you much good gambling.
Personally, I prefer a wide-term, loss-evading special strategy. I call it W.I.T.L.E.S.S. for short. I figure since "short-term" and "long-term" are subjective, why not use the "wide-term?"
I would say that pretty well fits you.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
I see it's time to slap some more sense into the so-called "LV experts" who permeate these forums.
While that California fool mdawg keeps you idiots obsessed with his fairy tales, you're still missing the big and only picture--regardless of the purported rumors about the wizard: mdawg keeps you jerks under his phoniness spell because you're all too stupid to realize that the way he claims to operate in the casinos is 100% opposite of how casinos actually operate. Anyone who's ever been involved in comps at the higher end of things would instantly realize this. And just think about the stupid handle the idiot uses: MDAWG. For Gods sake, he acts like Samuel L. Jackson or Randy "racist" Jackson personally bestowed his handle upon him. This poster has cliche'd himself into the type of underachiever only a "gotta keep up with my neighbors" pussy from California would fall into.
And speaking about pussies and hypocrites....where did I read that kew came out claiming mdawg was clinging to the loser's creed by saying how "he told us about a loss, but you can be sure he'll be back saying how he won it all back, and more". This....from the internet's BIGGEST HYPOCRITE/DEMOCRAT OF ALL TIME. How many times has kew come on after being excoriated about his non-stop "winning" to slip in a sudden, unexpected "loss"....only to come back to help us all wipe the sweat off of our brows by blabbing how "but guys--I just won it all back and MORE"....just like the math says it should happen to world-class AP's!!
A legend in his own mind. Wise up.
You know, it's a shame, that you can't be a more decent person. Even when you are right, you have to lie or distort reality. You are 100% correct that Mdawgs stories and claims, involving the comp part just is not how Las Vegas works. That is one of the tells that the whole thing is bullshit. BUT you are 100% wrong when you say we are all too stupid to realize it. I have been calling that out for months, as had Axelwolf and a few others. But it is pretty hard to keep doing that when you are repeatedly silenced from doing so, as I and other have been. This Mdawg person has either bought and paid for Wizard, or at the very least manipulates him to the point that Wizard shutdown anyone making legitimate challenges, either about the math (or lack of) or the way las Vegas works. So it is not that we are too stupid to realize anything, but we are not allowed to say. That is what that site is now. Mdawg manipulating Mike and making a mockery of everything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Now on to me reporting my results. Just can't help yourself can you. I am constantly on your mind, because I am a successful AP that you always wanted to be. Nobody, and I mean Nobody has shared their results as honestly as I have and that includes the losing or bad or ugly periods. How dare you say something so stupid and untrue as I always rebound wiping out the bad runs. I am coming off my worst year in 12 in Las Vegas, reported accurately as I was going through it and ending up far below expectation. Where was that great rebound that you just lied about? For god sakes, Rob, you don't have to lie about everything. Doing so puts you right in the same boat as this fictional Mdawg character.
Absolutely incredible goings on over at WoV! The mdawg team and supporters, of which Wizard aligned himself or was manipulated into, have taken up the full blown anti-math positions, arguing that math is voodoo, with statements like "Sorry, but all the advanced math knowledge in the world doesn't prove anything" on a forum that is all about the math, started by a guy who is all about the math. And Wizard sits by and says nothing. :(
This Mdawg and his great adventure was always about making a mockery of Wizard and WoV and it has come to fruition.
Who cares? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I believe you're beginning to notice and understand: you do not believe not want to believe a person who plays a strategy on vp such as I do can and has won with it--regardless if it's 99.9% -EV or less or 100.1% +ev or greater. It is inconceivable to you because it is outside the realm of which you say you play. Yet at the same time, you are completely annoyed whenever a poster says they don't believe what you claim YOUR results to be, simultaneously professing that no one on the forums has been more honest and upfront with their reported results than you! And this....without any proof from anybody ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJYou know, it's a shame, that you can't be a more decent person. Even when you are right, you have to lie or distort reality. You are 100% correct that Mdawgs stories and claims, involving the comp part just is not how Las Vegas works. That is one of the tells that the whole thing is bullshit. BUT you are 100% wrong when you say we are all too stupid to realize it. I have been calling that out for months, as had Axelwolf and a few others. But it is pretty hard to keep doing that when you are repeatedly silenced from doing so, as I and other have been. This Mdawg person has either bought and paid for Wizard, or at the very least manipulates him to the point that Wizard shutdown anyone making legitimate challenges, either about the math (or lack of) or the way las Vegas works. So it is not that we are too stupid to realize anything, but we are not allowed to say. That is what that site is now. Mdawg manipulating Mike and making a mockery of everything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Now on to me reporting my results. Just can't help yourself can you. I am constantly on your mind, because I am a successful AP that you always wanted to be. Nobody, and I mean Nobody has shared their results as honestly as I have and that includes the losing or bad or ugly periods. How dare you say something so stupid and untrue as I always rebound wiping out the bad runs. I am coming off my worst year in 12 in Las Vegas, reported accurately as I was going through it and ending up far below expectation. Where was that great rebound that you just lied about? For god sakes, Rob, you don't have to lie about everything. Doing so puts you right in the same boat as this fictional Mdawg character.
That's what I'm talking about kew. It isn't just with me--you're unendingly offended when ANYBODY questions what you say. And now that I brought up how you've continuously never talked about a losing session without explaining how we're not to worry because you shortly thereafter won it all back and more....it's very telling. At least to experienced gamblers it is.
I get that for some reason you NEED your brand to appear successful across the forums. It's basically you're entire life. But if you're gonna expect the masses to always believe in what you're claiming, you'd be wise to give the benefit of the doubt to others, even if you disagree with their methods or simply don't understand why different plottings on Bell Curves actually exist.
My honest take on you (beyond this undeniable/insatiable craving for forums attention and relevance/acceptance, that is) is that you became infatuated with living in LV at a young age, you saw it as a venue that could put up with your very minority but alternative lifestyle, and rather than pursue a productive lifestyle you chose to get involved with gambling--while totally ignoring WTF would happen to you once you reached 50. It makes for an admirable approach....for people who have non-aggressive short-term goals and who don't care to live comfortably for very long. Thus, I see why this stuff is so everything to you right now and for the time you saturate these forums. You've afforded yourself no other options.
It's hard to blame someone like that when it's how they choose to present the living they are making to others. Hell, I know axel does it and from our discussions he seems to have an otherwise normal life. Mickey also does it and he has an unconventional way of approaching things. There's plenty of others too. But there's also people like me, who chose to have an established family life and career before getting involved in professional gambling, which I also chose to close down the day the DU play died. Everyone's different. And just because you've got this pre-conceived notion that no one can be ahead after playing 4 years on + and -EV vp machines, it doesn't mean it hasn't happened. Even red's collection of University Math Professors would tell you that. And while I don't play professionally any more and don't use my play strategy, I've even won overall since 2009, albeit not by any significant amount.
Gambling's all about luck. Either the cards show up for you or they don't. I'm not afraid to say they didn't show up for me on a 2-night we just returned from at Circa, dropping $8700, and you won't see me trying to ease minds by claiming to have "won it all back, and more since. But it had NOTHING to do with whether my play was on a 99% game or a 101% game. The cards just didn't show. But you know what? I won't be at a casino again until next month sometime, and I'll simply withdraw cash from my retirement account and try to do better. Whether people on forums comment or even care about my play or stated results isn't the end-all in my life.
It shouldn't be so in your life either. Try it. You'll learn to enjoy and appreciate other aspects of life much more.
2 takeaways from Rob's above ramblings.
1.) Rob continues to try to push the erroneous narrative, that while players can win playing -EV over a very short period of time, this can be duplicated over and over, resulting in long-term winning. The best example against what Rob is claiming continues to be that it is very possible to walk into a casino and win 3 of 4 rounds of roulette betting black. But try doing that every day for a year.
2.) I guess Rob is now saying that his longterm -EV winning claims, which he has pushed as a legitimate winning strategy for years, are now due to his results being on the far outer edges of the bell curve, rather than a legitimate winning strategy. I guess that is a concession that these claimed winnings are not really possible via a legitimate winning strategy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I get a kick out of how people who are facing down the end of their lifespans argue tooth and nail that how they have lived (and gambled) was THE RIGHT WAY, even if it was all bullshit and losing and not knowing what the hell they were doing half the time. Play those parlays, boys.
Here's the "Singer" absurdity for the day. He's lecturing kewlJ about not being prepped to live comfortably beyond the age of 50. Yet somebody in his 70's is gallivanting around in a not-a-Newell day after day after day. So kewlJ is supposed to aspire to being trapped in 300 square feet of space on the nation's pot-holed highways in perpetuity? Kewlj's life is supposed to be the anomaly, according to "Singer."
I think you overestimated the square footage of a Winnebago Micro Minnie by a factor of 2. Under 150 sft is probably more like it. I am pretty sure you have to leave the squeegee at home when hitting the road in that goat.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I get a kick out of how people who are facing down the end of their lifespans argue tooth and nail that how they have lived (and gambled) was THE RIGHT WAY, even if it was all bullshit and losing and not knowing what the hell they were doing half the time. Play those parlays, boys.
Here's the "Singer" absurdity for the day. He's lecturing kewlJ about not being prepped to live comfortably beyond the age of 50. Yet somebody in his 70's is gallivanting around in a not-a-Newell day after day after day. So kewlJ is supposed to aspire to being trapped in 300 square feet of space on the nation's pot-holed highways in perpetuity? Kewlj's life is supposed to be the anomaly, according to "Singer."
Singer owning a micro anything is so ironic.....lol :)
No reason for a man who has both Social Security and a federal government pension to live in a small travel trailer, unless it's by choice or he somehow really shit the bed.
No reason for a man who has won (and presumably saved / invested) a lot of money playing VP and who receives monthly payments from both Social Security and a federal government pension to live in a small travel trailer, unless it's by choice or he somehow really shit the bed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBAijg5Betw
Makes about as much sense as going from a Newell to a micro Winnebago camper trailer. Next thing you know, MDog will be wearing a Timex.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenWho cares? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
What's interesting is that nobody, except the newbie fan club members, seems to buy the MDawg storyline any longer. And this is despite Shackleford, not because of him. Unless, that is, Shackleford was a witness to the 68K loss, which was the rationale for the reportage of same. That would explain the recent radio silence by Shackleford at WoV regarding MDawg.
I personally lean slightly to the theory that fear of The Boz led to an imposed loss report.
Meanwhile, the inestimable champion of all that's possible, coach belly, has also gone into radio silence vis-a-vis MDawg after the Dawg's purported 68K loss. I never thought of the coach as a fair weather friend, but he hasn't commented on the 68K downer. He must be awaiting the next 100K win, which is assuredly just over the posting rainbow.
Mdawg and the great fairytale is just floundering around like nothing we have ever seen. The 68k loss was an escalation of claims. These guys do that when no one (except their own sock puppets) is left believing and responding. So they escalate to generate new attention that they need. The 68k loss was the first step in that escalation. It clearly was going to be followed up with an even bigger win, or series of bigger wins, but when that was predicted before he even got to it, he had to changed course.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Now he is laying the groundwork for some much bigger wins with this talk today of "fine tuning what he is doing and learning to press harder". Funny how in one breath this clown says "he has been winning like this for years" and in the next, he is "fine tuning and still learning". Which is it? :confused:
My guess is in the next few days he will post a series of big wins (or one really big win) due to his "learning to press harder" and then skip town on a high note. He is setting that up. Although now that it has been predicted....who know. ;)
Doesn't even matter at this point. No one left believing and only his sockpuppets left talking. But it is fun watching him flounder and search for a great escape plan. :cool:
Final thought: kudos to OnceDear for the comment that WoV is Mdawg's forum, with forum crossed out and thread inserted. Bravo!
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJMdawg and the great fairytale is just floundering around like nothing we have ever seen. The 68k loss was an escalation of claims. These guys do that when no one (except their won sock puppets) is left believing and responding. So they escalate to generate new attention that they need. The 68k loss was the first step in that escalation. It clearly was going to be followed up with an even bigger win, or series of bigger wins, but when that was predicted before he even got to it, he had to changed course.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
What's interesting is that nobody, except the newbie fan club members, seems to buy the MDawg storyline any longer. And this is despite Shackleford, not because of him. Unless, that is, Shackleford was a witness to the 68K loss, which was the rationale for the reportage of same. That would explain the recent radio silence by Shackleford at WoV regarding MDawg.
Now he is laying the groundwork for some much bigger wins with this talk today of "fine tuning what he is doing and learning to press harder". Funny how in one breath this clown says "he has been winning like this for years" and in the next, he is "fine tuning and still learning". Which is it? :confused:
My guess is in the next few days he will post a series of big wins (or one really big win) due to his "learning to press harder" and then skip town on a high note. He is setting that up. Although now that it has been predicted....who know. ;)
Doesn't even matter at this point. No one left believing and only his sockpuppets left talking. But it is fun watching him flounder and search for a great escape plan. :cool:
Final thought: kudos to OnceDear for the comment that this is Mdawgs forum, with forum crossed out and thread inserted. Bravo!
I have to give you credit for the escalation prediction, kewlJ. That's the proper analysis, I think. It's an attention issue. The previous amounts being wagered by MDawg were okay, but they weren't all that.
So escalation it will be. You are undoubtedly correct.
It would be interesting to see if someone who won 40 out of 41 stops at a place like the Wynn would actually continue to get comped to the gills. Maybe they would. Would theo win the day, or would the powers that be shut comps down? In sports betting, I think somewhere like the Wynn would trust the theo regardless of outcomes, although 40 out of 41 might test their generosity a bit. I'll never know myself -- getting simple RFB at the Wynn or Encore via sports betting would require something like six digits every single day.
I also believe that will happen. After all, what are forum members left to think, if the incredible self-proclaimed winner who rejects and denies play-witnesses, was forced into posting about a phony loss in the hope of converting doubters?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJMdawg and the great fairytale is just floundering around like nothing we have ever seen. The 68k loss was an escalation of claims. These guys do that when no one (except their own sock puppets) is left believing and responding. So they escalate to generate new attention that they need. The 68k loss was the first step in that escalation. It clearly was going to be followed up with an even bigger win, or series of bigger wins, but when that was predicted before he even got to it, he had to changed course.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Now he is laying the groundwork for some much bigger wins with this talk today of "fine tuning what he is doing and learning to press harder". Funny how in one breath this clown says "he has been winning like this for years" and in the next, he is "fine tuning and still learning". Which is it? :confused:
My guess is in the next few days he will post a series of big wins (or one really big win) due to his "learning to press harder" and then skip town on a high note. He is setting that up. Although now that it has been predicted....who know. ;)
Doesn't even matter at this point. No one left believing and only his sockpuppets left talking. But it is fun watching him flounder and search for a great escape plan. :cool:
Final thought: kudos to OnceDear for the comment that WoV is Mdawg's forum, with forum crossed out and thread inserted. Bravo!
Remember your claimed $28k loss??
Just sayin'.....
Rob, I have shared my experiences, winning, losing, backoffs, all sorts of different experiences for a decade on different forums, long before I came here and you know of me. I actually don't share too much here, because there just aren't many (blackjack) players here that can benefit and only a few fellow AP's that are even interested. So I keep that to a minimum, but I do share experiences that are new or unusual to me, meaning I haven't gone through before.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Now if I recall, the 28k loss was a week for me. I have bad weeks or runs all the time. What made that stand out for me, if I am not mistaken is that it was very early in the year, like my second week in January. Not the way you want the year to start and that 28k in the red pops out at you. I think it may have also involved 2 consecutive (or 2 out of 3) 10k losing days, which is also very unusual for me. At my level of play, I only experience 3 or 4, 10k losing days a year, so to have 2 consecutive or several days apart, was very rare for me (don't think it has happened before or since), so I shared it.
Just stop with your silliness, Rob. You don't like me and that is fine. But don't try to re-write history. I share my journey accurately......at least as much as I can without harming myself, sometimes more than I should. People can believe or not believe. Honestly doesn't matter to me. If they don't understand or are honestly mis-representing something, I will try to explain or correct.
The amounts also are something that don't matter one bit to me. If this Mdawg person was born into a wealthy family and money, or even made a lot of money on his own, power to him and can bet large, power to him.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
I am only interested that the claims can't be! One of the things that can't be is the amounts he is talking, while much larger than I can play (actually, that isn't really even true, my limitations are more about casino tolerance as to what I do), but his amounts don't work. Cosmo, Bellegio, Wynn, Venetian are not giving a player high end suites for months at a time, for those amounts. A comped room? Maybe. Especially as Vegas has been slow and is just now getting back to normal, but not the high end suites he is claiming for months on end. AND they would not continue to do so if the player continues to win, theo or not.
There comes a point where they say something isn't right. And this guy has been posting these reports and claims for several years and even claims to have won every year for 20 years. Anyone that thinks the high end casinos is giving high end suites to a player that has won for 20 years, just doesn't have a clue about how the casino industry works in Las Vegas.
So even before you get into ALL the winning, (what is it like 100 winning sessions vs 2 losing sessions over the last 2 trip?), other parts to the story and claims, simply don't ring true.
And in catching up a bit today, I forgot to mention the most glaring thing this fool, Mdawg said. He figured out his big losing session was due to receiving a phone call from a buddy that he considers an unlucky person. You just can not make this shit up! (where is the rolling on the floor, laughing so hard, you choke emoji?)
KJ, I believe Singer is saying that for all he knows your many years of bJ play as reported by you on various gambling boards may in fact be baloney, given your anonymity and his inability to independently confirm your claims.
Well he may be right MisterV. :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Seriously the difference is Math. Here is the way I look at it. If a person makes claims, and the math works, I don't say a word, even if I have reason not to believe the person. But if the math doesn't work, in other words, the person is claiming to be able to levitate and fly around the world....yeah they are going to have to show a little something.
Now back to people making claims that I may not believe (and the math isn't defied). Everyone is entitled to decide for themselves and that is what credibility is...does this person know what they are talking about or are they usually just talking and things don't add up.
If Rob or anyone else, concludes that I really don't know what I am talking about as far as blackjack card counting and particularly doing so in Vegas, that is absolutely fine with me. They are a bad judge of character, but I am fine with that. :) But you and I both know that is usually not what happens. The people that challenge me do so because they don't like me, don't like how I can be a little abrasive on forums, don't like my sexuality, don't like successful AP's that I am one of, one guy and I won't mention his name, doesn't like me because I share my experiences and results.
Indeed.
The more we dwell on these board it seems the more likely we are to form hidebound opinions and to attack those who disagree with us.
It might not be your cup of tea but RV sales have skyrocketed over the past year. Companies reporting 30% increase in sales.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I get a kick out of how people who are facing down the end of their lifespans argue tooth and nail that how they have lived (and gambled) was THE RIGHT WAY, even if it was all bullshit and losing and not knowing what the hell they were doing half the time. Play those parlays, boys.
Here's the "Singer" absurdity for the day. He's lecturing kewlJ about not being prepped to live comfortably beyond the age of 50. Yet somebody in his 70's is gallivanting around in a not-a-Newell day after day after day. So kewlJ is supposed to aspire to being trapped in 300 square feet of space on the nation's pot-holed highways in perpetuity? Kewlj's life is supposed to be the anomaly, according to "Singer."
Those Newell level RV's out there are huge black holes you throw money down. I think a lot of people have downsized to 5th wheels to cut expenses after going whole hog with big expensive fuel guzzling RV's.
Are they any viable EV RV's out there yet?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmIt might not be your cup of tea but RV sales have skyrocketed over the past year. Companies reporting 30% increase in sales.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I get a kick out of how people who are facing down the end of their lifespans argue tooth and nail that how they have lived (and gambled) was THE RIGHT WAY, even if it was all bullshit and losing and not knowing what the hell they were doing half the time. Play those parlays, boys.
Here's the "Singer" absurdity for the day. He's lecturing kewlJ about not being prepped to live comfortably beyond the age of 50. Yet somebody in his 70's is gallivanting around in a not-a-Newell day after day after day. So kewlJ is supposed to aspire to being trapped in 300 square feet of space on the nation's pot-holed highways in perpetuity? Kewlj's life is supposed to be the anomaly, according to "Singer."
Those Newell level RV's out there are huge black holes you throw money down. I think a lot of people have downsized to 5th wheels to cut expenses after going whole hog with big expensive fuel guzzling RV's.
That wasn't really my point, mickey.
I actually don't have any issue with road living. I have watched videos by some people who go on US walkabouts, only the walkabouts are in their cars. They live in their cars while touring the country, some for a year or more. More power to them.
What I find absurd is when "Singer" tries to categorize one way of living (the "RV Life" for folks in their 70's) as normal and healthy while trying to categorize townhouse ownership by a young guy in LV as the anomaly.
Couple years ago, I was talking to an older dude and his wife, 60ish, at Sam's Town (LV) while in line at the buffet. They were staying in the RV Park at Sam's Town. I forget where they were from, but they came every year a couple days after Xmas and stayed until April. At the time I was thinking something like that might be fun, plus traveling around seeing different parts of the country. But I think I would be tired of that kind of living after about a week.
And I don't think it would be economical at all. Whether a pull behind type thing or full blown RV, you are going to get crappy gas mileage. And it seems like those things depreciate like mad. Then you still gotta go to the grocery story and cook meals. When the time comes, I think I would rather just travel around the country, staying in decent hotels and eating out. That's just me. :rolleyes:
That's some straight fucking hobo logic right there.....lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Everyone knows the Rolls Royce driver is worried about miles per gallon.....lol
Next thing you know people will be trading in their private jets for hanggliders.
Say what you want but you have to have some serious balls to do that crazy shit!!Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFOBufftcyQ
Not my logic. I got it from experienced RV'ers, moron.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenThat's some straight fucking hobo logic right there.....lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Everyone knows the Rolls Royce driver is worried about miles per gallon.....lol
Next thing you know people will be trading in their private jets for hanggliders.
I lived in a travel trailer for 2 years when I was single and absolutely loved it. The compactness and comfort, along with versatility made it perfect for my needs. Later on, my wife and I loved the weekends at the lake with her parents.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmIt might not be your cup of tea but RV sales have skyrocketed over the past year. Companies reporting 30% increase in sales.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I get a kick out of how people who are facing down the end of their lifespans argue tooth and nail that how they have lived (and gambled) was THE RIGHT WAY, even if it was all bullshit and losing and not knowing what the hell they were doing half the time. Play those parlays, boys.
Here's the "Singer" absurdity for the day. He's lecturing kewlJ about not being prepped to live comfortably beyond the age of 50. Yet somebody in his 70's is gallivanting around in a not-a-Newell day after day after day. So kewlJ is supposed to aspire to being trapped in 300 square feet of space on the nation's pot-holed highways in perpetuity? Kewlj's life is supposed to be the anomaly, according to "Singer."
Those Newell level RV's out there are huge black holes you throw money down. I think a lot of people have downsized to 5th wheels to cut expenses after going whole hog with big expensive fuel guzzling RV's.
"I think" is what you wrote. You came to a moronic conclusion and now you want to blame that on RV'ers...(insert hobo laugh here)BWAHAHAHAQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmNot my logic. I got it from experienced RV'ers, moron.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenThat's some straight fucking hobo logic right there.....lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Everyone knows the Rolls Royce driver is worried about miles per gallon.....lol
Next thing you know people will be trading in their private jets for hanggliders.
Oh good, Porkchop is back posting. I was afraid someone took him deep into the desert and left him there. ;)
I haven't gone hang-gliding, but my brother has talked me into going skydiving and camping out in the grand canyon and death valley. All things I could have been very comfortable going through life without. :rolleyes: I don't like to say no and seem like a pussy, so I end up doing stupid shit and hating him for a few days. Let's hope he never gets around to hang-gliding.
Back to Mfraud. Today he has made a number of incorrect statements about blackjack. He just seems to make shit up to suit his needs (a 600 page thread now ;))
So Mdawg posted that there is no way to get an advantage in blackjack flat bettings because the player doesn't have the option to not bet. The Player most certainly DOES have the option to not bet. It is called wonging out. You exit negative counts and look for better opportunities.
In addition, card counting is not the only advantage play in blackjack. Hole-carders like jbjb most certainly can and do play with an advantage while flat betting. Feel free to weigh in jbjb.
And finally, while I am not a proponent of multi-level counts or side counts, if a player has access to decent single deck games (Reno) and there really is only one serious player I know of that plays that regularly, Moses, such a count could be enough to flip the game to a slight player advantage while flat betting. I think most players would still use a small spread, but the game can turn advantageous by count alone.
So the idiot (mdawg) that said anyone claiming to play blackjack at an advantage by flatbetting shouldn't be believed as to anything else they say is wrong as usual. It is he (mdawg) who shouldn't and now isn't believed as to anything he says because he gets almost everything wrong. He makes it all up as he goes.
Of course the great Wizard has removed and restricted anyone who might correct these things (at Mdawg's request) giving this idiot free reign to make shit up and mislead people.
The Wiz has been about as useful as shit on a plow handle when it comes to either debunking or exonerating Mdouche.
An odd wizard.
It is MORE than that MisterV. I am welcome to participate at WoV, but restricted from one thread (at Mdawgs request). Name me one other time that has happened?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
You will also note that Axelwolf, also a big critic of Mdawg because the things Mdawg says are not true and can't be, has been silenced. Axel has been suspended about 4 times over the Mdawg situation and as of late has all but disappeared. I am guessing behind the scenes he was told to lay off Mdawg.
Wizards allowing this to continue is more than "odd". Based on how he jumped at the measly $500 to witness Mdawg and has now met with Mdawg, one can't help but wonder if Mdawg hasn't paid Mike directly to protect him now. And that is 100% Wizards doing by failing to be objective and transparent. He opens himself up to that kind of thing. But what can't be denied is that Mdawg has made a mockery of Wizard, WoV and the math behind gambling and Wizard for whatever reason, is now part of it.
What is the player's mathematical advantage for hands that he bets zero?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
You have a very short leash. If you are going to be an idiot and play games I will go back to blocking you.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyWhat is the player's mathematical advantage for hands that he bets zero?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
The answer is zero of course. But the player advantage is made up of ALL hands played and of all hand played this strategy will produce a winning +EV strategy.
I don't care if you block me, I don't value your answers to my questions.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Is it practical to play only positive counts?
Is it even possible to play only positive counts for any meaningful period under actual casino conditions?
I didn't say play ONLY positive counts. That is what a pure wong in style is. And that would result in a player advantage. personally, I don't think that can be employed easily on a regular basis for long.
BUT combining a wong out style, which means you will play off the top (slightly negative) and slightly negative counts until a predetermined negative count exit trigger, AND play ALL positive counts resulting in a +EV or winning strategy, is very doable. I have been incorporating that as part of my play for 12 years now.
You've been playing mostly positive count rounds, while flat-betting off the top and throughout?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
That is NOT what I said. I clearly said incorporating did I not?Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyYou've been playing mostly positive count rounds, while flat-betting off the top and throughout?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
In my case that means that I still use a spread, to gain a meaningful advantage that I can make a living from. So in my case that wong out allows me to employ a smaller spread than otherwise would need be employed. That is one of the ways I have been able to achieve longevity.
But the fact remains, wonging in and out can allow a player to gain an edge while flatbetting, which is 100% contrary to the false bullshit, Mshit posted. It is just another case of this clown making shit up.
I was told no such thing it had not even been suggested. AAMOF, I was even told there were going to be fewer suspensions overall. There's a little confirmation bias and a little conspiracy on your part along with some coincidence and a natural course of things. Things totally jumped the shark when that troll/ sockpuppet/ dumbfuck wellbush showed up. If you haven't noticed... it's basically him bumping the thread with the same nonsense over and over, along with a few stragglers here and there. It's like talking to someone like Nathan.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I knew when I got bored with Mdawg and moved on the interest in him and his threads would plummet, I outright said that and alluded to that fact many times, even he suspected this would happen. There will always be some people that remain obsessed with things for the remainder of their life and can't move on.
You only notice my participation drop on the forums( And not just the Mdawg crap) when it comes to things that involve you, It happens more than you think. Now that my wife and I are fully vaccinated and things are getting back to normal, I'm not spending as much time online and more time out and I have been busy. I haven't even had the time to meet up with friends and others who recently came to town.
Also, summer is almost here and I'm trying to get some outside work done on my small turtle falls/ pond and garden, I'm redoing the entire thing while paying great attention to aesthetic detail and better functionality. I have also been doing some home improvement stuff.
Now with the conspiracy stuff regarding Mdawg and Mike, you all with your crazy theories. I just don't think Mike cares, either way, there's no legit reason to ban Mdawg. Perhaps Mike could find a reason but just likes guys like Mdawg and EvenBob for whatever reason. in general, To like or dislike others due to other people's views and feelings is dumb and to like or dislike someone based on who they like is even dumber.
If you expect people not to have any biases, you are going to be highly disappointed for the rest of your life.
Mike doesn't understand why people cannot just block him or not read his stuff. The reason there were so many suspensions was due to the fact that Mdawg had to be harassing Mike to suspend people.
Let's just assume all your theories are 100% true. Ask yourself, how does this really affect your life? then tell yourself to GET OVER IT, because no one important to you and your life really cares about all this nonsense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfI was told no such thing it had not even been suggested. AAMOF, I was even told there were going to be fewer suspensions overall. There's a little confirmation bias and a little conspiracy on your part along with some coincidence and a natural course of things. Things totally jumped the shark when that troll/ sockpuppet/ dumbfuck wellbush showed up. If you haven't noticed... it's basically him bumping the thread with the same nonsense over and over, along with a few stragglers here and there. It's like talking to someone like Nathan.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I knew when I got bored with Mdawg and moved on the interest in him and his threads would plummet, I outright said that and alluded to that fact many times, even he suspected this would happen. There will always be some people that remain obsessed with things for the remainder of their life and can't move on.
You only notice my participation drop on the forums( And not just the Mdawg crap) when it comes to things that involve you, It happens more than you think. Now that my wife and I are fully vaccinated and things are getting back to normal, I'm not spending as much time online and more time out and I have been busy. I haven't even had the time to meet up with friends and others who recently came to town.
Also, summer is almost here and I'm trying to get some outside work done on my small turtle falls/ pond and garden, I'm redoing the entire thing while paying great attention to aesthetic detail and better functionality. I have also been doing some home improvement stuff.
Now with the conspiracy stuff regarding Mdawg and Mike, you all with your crazy theories. I just don't think Mike cares, either way, there's no legit reason to ban Mdawg. Perhaps Mike could find a reason but just likes guys like Mdawg and EvenBob for whatever reason. in general, To like or dislike others due to other people's views and feelings is dumb and to like or dislike someone based on who they like is even dumber.
If you expect people not to have any biases, you are going to be highly disappointed for the rest of your life.
Mike doesn't understand why people cannot just block him or not read his stuff. The reason there were so many suspensions was due to the fact that Mdawg had to be harassing Mike to suspend people.
Let's just assume all your theories are 100% true. Ask yourself, how does this really affect your life? then tell yourself to GET OVER IT, because no one important to you and your life really cares about all this nonsense.
LOL. Civics lessons from Axel.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Ok, I accept that my theory that you had been told to stand down is wrong. I thought that because you disappeared just about the time, Mike restricted me.
BUT don't put all this theory stuff on me, Axelwolf. You have repeatedly posted all sorts of theories. Everything from that Mdawg was a Rolex dealer. :confused: To an employee of the real person playing. To a family member, maybe son of the real person playing. Some of those I have bought into and some I haven't. We all have these theories of what is, because the only thing we really know FOR SURE is what is NOT and what is not, is the story is not true as told. The math doesn't add up and many other details don't add up. Some of them are minor things that only real players playing Vegas would know. But there are like a zillion pieces to the puzzle that don't fit or add up. So yes, that leaves us all wondering and coming up with theories.
And you may very well be right with your statement that Mike just doesn't care. You would know that better than me. But that too bothers me. He should care. His forum is supposed to be about the math and by the math as stated these claims can not be. If there is something else going on, something that enables Mdawg to play with and advantage, that would be fine, but he answered no to that, numerous times over a year ago.
Now, I don't know if that comment about banning was directed at me or just general, but I have never called for Mdawg to be banned or suspended. Not publicly, not privately. I wonder if he can honestly say the same about me. Nor have I ever called for anyone to be banned or suspended since I returned last year. I would say ever but I don't remember if I did with Norm or not. When it became obvious to everyone but Mike that Norm was just there to have me silenced, I may have called for his removal instead, since he had no intent on being a real member. But other than that I have never called for anyone to be suspended or banned. I am fine with Mdawg making whatever bullshit claims he wants as long as the real players and math guys are allowed to challenge claims that can't be.
As far as wellbush and sockpuppets, they are supposed to not be allowed at WoV. And WoV has been very vigilant about looking into them and eliminating them. I do find it very strange that now all of the sudden, there seems to be a lot of looking the other way. Sock puppets are for one reason only and that is to try to create some credibility where there is no real people believing.
I guess some of this is on me. I liked WoV when I was there the first time. it was about Math and helping people be better gamblers and players. Claims that were bullshit, were immediately called out as bullshit. Singer's claims, phony systems, 18 y.o. in a row (sorry Alan). Mike didn't stand by and say nothing to these claims. Bullshit was called out as bullshit. Now that Michael has had his big payday, he just doesn't care, that someone is making a mockery of the forum. That is sad, but like I said, that is on me.
Yes, I think that because of what RV'ers have said about it. Google it you dumb ass bastard. Then get your ass back to the nickel keno.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen"I think" is what you wrote. You came to a moronic conclusion and now you want to blame that on RV'ers...(insert hobo laugh here)BWAHAHAHAQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmNot my logic. I got it from experienced RV'ers, moron.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
That's some straight fucking hobo logic right there.....lmao
Everyone knows the Rolls Royce driver is worried about miles per gallon.....lol
Next thing you know people will be trading in their private jets for hanggliders.
Please leave me out of this.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfI was told no such thing it had not even been suggested. AAMOF, I was even told there were going to be fewer suspensions overall. There's a little confirmation bias and a little conspiracy on your part along with some coincidence and a natural course of things. Things totally jumped the shark when that troll/ sockpuppet/ dumbfuck wellbush showed up. If you haven't noticed... it's basically him bumping the thread with the same nonsense over and over, along with a few stragglers here and there. It's like talking to someone like Nathan.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I knew when I got bored with Mdawg and moved on the interest in him and his threads would plummet, I outright said that and alluded to that fact many times, even he suspected this would happen. There will always be some people that remain obsessed with things for the remainder of their life and can't move on.
You only notice my participation drop on the forums( And not just the Mdawg crap) when it comes to things that involve you, It happens more than you think. Now that my wife and I are fully vaccinated and things are getting back to normal, I'm not spending as much time online and more time out and I have been busy. I haven't even had the time to meet up with friends and others who recently came to town.
Also, summer is almost here and I'm trying to get some outside work done on my small turtle falls/ pond and garden, I'm redoing the entire thing while paying great attention to aesthetic detail and better functionality. I have also been doing some home improvement stuff.
Now with the conspiracy stuff regarding Mdawg and Mike, you all with your crazy theories. I just don't think Mike cares, either way, there's no legit reason to ban Mdawg. Perhaps Mike could find a reason but just likes guys like Mdawg and EvenBob for whatever reason. in general, To like or dislike others due to other people's views and feelings is dumb and to like or dislike someone based on who they like is even dumber.
If you expect people not to have any biases, you are going to be highly disappointed for the rest of your life.
Mike doesn't understand why people cannot just block him or not read his stuff. The reason there were so many suspensions was due to the fact that Mdawg had to be harassing Mike to suspend people.
Let's just assume all your theories are 100% true. Ask yourself, how does this really affect your life? then tell yourself to GET OVER IT, because no one important to you and your life really cares about all this nonsense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyI don't care if you block me, I don't value your answers to my questions.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Is it practical to play only positive counts?
Is it even possible to play only positive counts for any meaningful period under actual casino conditions?
Since you do not value KewlJ's answers to your questions, then why are you still asking questions in replies to answers from him?
I was advised that tewlj had blocked me,Quote:
Originally Posted by BoSox
my questions were rhetorical and don't require answers from tewlj.
Naturally the Einsteins on here who have zero knowledge and experience with RV's are going to try to show what geniuses they are whenever mickey or anyone puts up common sense-based facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmIt might not be your cup of tea but RV sales have skyrocketed over the past year. Companies reporting 30% increase in sales.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I get a kick out of how people who are facing down the end of their lifespans argue tooth and nail that how they have lived (and gambled) was THE RIGHT WAY, even if it was all bullshit and losing and not knowing what the hell they were doing half the time. Play those parlays, boys.
Here's the "Singer" absurdity for the day. He's lecturing kewlJ about not being prepped to live comfortably beyond the age of 50. Yet somebody in his 70's is gallivanting around in a not-a-Newell day after day after day. So kewlJ is supposed to aspire to being trapped in 300 square feet of space on the nation's pot-holed highways in perpetuity? Kewlj's life is supposed to be the anomaly, according to "Singer."
Those Newell level RV's out there are huge black holes you throw money down. I think a lot of people have downsized to 5th wheels to cut expenses after going whole hog with big expensive fuel guzzling RV's.
Newell, Prevost and Custom RV owners mostly wouldn't care about a pitiful 5mpg diesel while hauling a vehicle--but some do. Not all of these owners are super wealthy to the point of a series of $500 fill-ups being neither here nor there. First off, buying an RV of any type is not a sound financial move. They immediately greatly depreciate and never appreciate. And they live out their lifetimes as non-stop money pits for multiple reasons. That's why we finally sold our Newell. I got it at a time when we were just becoming infatuated with living and traveling in an RV, and I was cash-heavy at the time. But as red eluded to, regardless of the level of luxury surrounding you, there's still a puny 300 sq.ft. inside one of those. Clearly, being full-timers is not a great way to live.
Now we're on the other end of the spectrum: using a small camper/pu truck for only the summer months while keeping multiple homes to travel between the rest of the year. The comparatively small amount of money sunk into our RV side now is overall insignificant, while the homes appreciate--esp. the ones in the Phx. area. I know I know I got the houses in my children's names so they're technically not ours. But the kids are, and as parents--which most of you aren't--being able to have done this with money we would leave them someday anyway, means much.
There seems to be an obsession here over if I did win with my strategy on slightly -EV play, that it was only because I lucked out....it couldn't be replicated by the masses. Well you finally got it--my strategy gives good luck the best opportunity to appear, and it takes someone with the discipline, determination and the intelligence of myself to be successful with it. That's why comparing my method to that idiot mdawg is irrelevant. He can't even get his casino visit BS to line up with reality.
It was good to see axel talk about doing some home projects and going out with his wife more now that Covid is slowing down. Never hurts to show what a real life means compared to all the nonsense bickering that forums produce.
What's with Mdouche's wingman, SmellyTush?
That moron is simpler than Simple Simon on his worst day and denser than osmium.
I'd block him too except he provides unintentional comedy relief.
"The blunder from down under"
-However, over a long enough period, you will lose EXACTLY the house edge times the total amount you bet. Varying your bets will have no effect on that fact-
(sorry, I don't know how to transfer a direct quote from one forum to another). The above is taken from an post by Ace2 today. It can't be repeated often enough in my opinion! :cool:
The 2 clowns Mdawg and his sockpuppet bushman or whatever (and Mdawg is going out of his way to make it appear bushman is from Australia, but like everything else that is pretend, Mate. <-;)) just both seem to have no idea how the house advantage and -EV works.
so 2 things going on. 1) at times Mdoggy is arguing that varying bets can change expectation. That in itself tells you everything anyone needs to know about this fairytale. Again, Ace2's quote (above) should be repeated each and every time Mdoofus heads down this road.
2.) At times Mdawg seems to imply that he knows the next card coming. Now that would be hole-carding and could result in playing +EV. Problem with that scenario is it conflicts with what he repeatedly said last year, that he wasn't hole-carding or playing with an advantage. In other words, one or the other is a lie. Now it won't be the first time he has lied or changed his story. After 40 some consecutive winning days, he posted about a losing day and immediately sprung it upon us that he has a loss rebate. That is changing the story, a lie of omission and again, a lie based on what he said last year.
I see mention of an 80k win after his 68k loss.....who didn't see that coming, and said so :D. So while this "story" and that's what it is a fictional, fairytale of a story, is at times entertaining, it is all make believe and full of contradictions, every changing parts, previously omitted parts, and flat out lies that contradict previous statements.
I REALLY don't think that Wellbush is Mdawg. Wellbush is just an adamant and staunch supporter of Mdawg. I notice something VERY interesting about Wellbush. Wellbush has been a Member of WOV for only about two months and already has almost 400 posts. The ONLY other Poster who has done that in WOV History was my Kentry Account, with 384 posts before being banned as Kentry after admitting I lost $250 on a bad Casino Session.
Well that confirms that it is a sockpuppet. Each and EVERY time you have said something like this, you have been wrong. You are like 0 out of 20. So thanks for confirming. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
I also said that Mendoza wasn't a Sockpuppet, and I was right. Mendoza got banned from WOV for coming across as a Troll, not for being a Sockpuppet....Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWell that confirms that it is a sockpuppet. Each and EVERY time you have said something like this, you have been wrong. You are like 0 out of 20. So thanks for confirming. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I appear to have been off by a bit. I said MDawg would have a 100K win "assuredly" on its way. Kudos to Mdawg for taking the low key route and reporting just an 80K session.
All hat and no cattle.