Nope, not me Ron. Shackleford knows this person. You are about as stupid as Freddy. ;)
Printable View
Nope, not me Ron. Shackleford knows this person. You are about as stupid as Freddy. ;)
Says who?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Says 214me4ever:Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
"I am a first time member here who lives in Vegas and knows how things work in this town. Many here know me or know of me including Shack."
Just curious if the 2 cycle thing to avoid detection is something you can google? This is the first time I have seen it written about however I'm not looking so who knows.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerIt never crosses his mind. He simply plagiarizes all his nonsense from others who've already done the work, then adds in his signature dumbing-down of the material in order to make it look like it could be a fit for his anti-mdawg insanity.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
He's also posted at least 10,000 words claiming PV "exposed my VP win as being from a picture on a computer screen" I guess because of the cursor and blue line. And it was, because the file was too large to post from the phone so my son got it onto his laptop in order to get it into VCT....the same problem mickey just had in his Road Trip thread. I debunked PV's claim (and broke hearts) when I sent the original pics from the casino to mickey to see if he could post them, which he did.
In fact, at the time Alan asked of the envious whiners: "So how'd he do THAT?"
To which the idiots were held speechless....
I chalk it all up to the little people syndrome :)
Rob, just saying something doesn't make it so; fact is, you've NOT "debunked" PV's exposure of your bullshit claim of winning $1.5M at a casino, a casino which you also falsely claim asked you not to be publicly identify.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
What a crock of shit.
"The Big Lie" hasn't worked too well for Trump either, i.e. "The election was stolen" viz "I won $1.5M on one push of a VP button and the casino told me not to identify it."
Couple it to the pic of fake money, the Newell saga, and of course the DUB brag and hey, you are beyond being not credible.
But that's fine, press on regardless.
There is probably some medical term for it MrV, but what it is, is being detached from reality or living in an alternative reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVRob, just saying something doesn't make it so; fact is, you've NOT "debunked" PV's exposure of your bullshit claim of winning $1.5M at a casino, a casino which you also falsely claim asked you not to be publicly identify.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
What a crock of shit.
Being 100% irrelevant must be a bitch. But, keep up the good work.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJThere is probably some medical term for it MrV, but what it is, is being detached from reality or living in an alternative reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVRob, just saying something doesn't make it so; fact is, you've NOT "debunked" PV's exposure of your bullshit claim of winning $1.5M at a casino, a casino which you also falsely claim asked you not to be publicly identify.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
What a crock of shit.
A dwindling amount of thus stuff for the remainder of us to enjoy such a good laugh.
Delusional is the term I was looking for.
And fuck off Garnabby/bill yung. The term for you is asshole.
Singer is far from delusional. Nothing about others out to get him, him being God, or, in the possession of a working theory of everything, or other means to save the Earth.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
But, being an asshole (shit disturber) is a prerequisite for being relevant. As is never selling out to the psychopaths that rule over society, let alone over a bunch of shithole casinos. A backbone, either, can't hurt.
Now back to your card counting baloney. MrV can get back to the ladderball with a buzz on. Ha.
Whoa, a mind reader.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrimReaper
My ladder ball buddy is coming over to watch the game on my home theater, and pre-game we'll smoke some legal 28% THC cannabis and play ladder ball: the soggy ground has firmed up enough.
Garnabby: don't knock LB til you've tried it.
So Rob is now Axelwolf?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVRob, just saying something doesn't make it so; fact is, you've NOT "debunked" PV's exposure of your bullshit claim of winning $1.5M at a casino, a casino which you also falsely claim asked you not to be publicly identify.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
What a crock of shit.
"The Big Lie" hasn't worked too well for Trump either, i.e. "The election was stolen" viz "I won $1.5M on one push of a VP button and the casino told me not to identify it."
Couple it to the pic of fake money, the Newell saga, and of course the DUB brag and hey, you are beyond being not credible.
But that's fine, press on regardless.
And the election was stolen. Stolen by ballot harvesting and big tech censorship.
---> Armando Heredia.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
https://anagram-solver.net/Whoa,%20a...r?partial=true
Quote:
A Whitehorse psychiatrist is raising concerns about patient confidentiality in Yukon, saying the territorial government pressures doctors to share personal and sensitive medical files, or forfeit payment.
Dr. Armando Heredia says the practice of sharing files with government is "rampant" among Yukon doctors, and he's complained to the Yukon privacy commissioner about the issue.
Quote:
This is what psychologists term “mind reading” — a habitual thinking pattern characterized by expecting others to know what you're thinking without having to tell them, or expecting to know what others are thinking without them telling you.
---> Interventional Cardiology.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
https://anagram-solver.net/Garnabby%....?partial=true
Exercise, I guess.
Anyway, the answer to the Superbowl is tied up in something from the above.
Double P.S.S. The answer is by way of Crimm, as further evidenced by his (subconscious mistakenly) posting around this message. As well, again, I rarely "translate" other than the first, or last, bit of a reply.
So Rob is now Axelwolf?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVRob, just saying something doesn't make it so; fact is, you've NOT "debunked" PV's exposure of your bullshit claim of winning $1.5M at a casino, a casino which you also falsely claim asked you not to be publicly identify.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
What a crock of shit.
"The Big Lie" hasn't worked too well for Trump either, i.e. "The election was stolen" viz "I won $1.5M on one push of a VP button and the casino told me not to identify it."
Couple it to the pic of fake money, the Newell saga, and of course the DUB brag and hey, you are beyond being not credible.
But that's fine, press on regardless.
And the election WAS stolen. Stolen by ballot harvesting and big tech censorship.
The FBI also played a big role in stealing the election.
Okay, the right team won. I'm now 2 for 3, but, I made the mistake, last year, of broadcasting a result beforehand, and, so, found out that anagrams-with-gematria aren't to be exploited for pecuniary profits.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrimReaper
Because the solver works best with grammatically correct full versions of input lines, and, because I noticed that MrV put LB for ladderball, I thought to go this route, by gradually spelling things out, from the original input line,
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
---> Logan Creek (Tally Lake tributary). [Which is in Montana]Quote:
Garnabby: don't knock LadderBall til you've tried it.
https://anagram-solver.net/Garnabby%....?partial=true
---> Orangeville, DeKalb County, Indiana. [Orangeville is another city near Kitchener, Ontario, and, with the color and name of my avatar]Quote:
Garnabby: don't knock LadderBall until you've tried it.
https://anagram-solver.net/Garnabby%....?partial=true
---> Kandakadu Drug Rehabilitation Centre. [Notice the Kan part forming only part way because there's no 's' in the input line]Quote:
Garnabby: don't knock LadderBall until you have tried it.
https://anagram-solver.net/Garnabby%....?partial=true
--->Quote:
Garnabby: do not knock LadderBall until you have tried it.
Kandakadu Drug Rehabilitation Centre.
Eagle Lake, Haliburton County, Ontario. [Now notice the Eagle part forming only part way, again, because there's no 's' in the input line]
https://anagram-solver.net/Garnabby%....?partial=true
Finally, notice the last bit of each of the latter output lines, as paired up, in first, and, then, second, places, respectively. The words, Centre, and, Ontario, which, to me, further confirms all of what occurred. I have no idea of a reason that I didn't lengthen the "don't" contraction, first, but, I just didn't.
As well, notice that the sum of the scores was 73 = (10*70 + 2 + 1) ---> 1721, or 1271, and, that 57 = 19*3 = 19*[6 / (1 + 1)] ---> 1/1691, or 1/1961. That 1/1961 in a couple of posts before. Perhaps, to further confirm that the year 1961 is an inverse of 1271, with 2/7 (2 July) for 1961, or, 1691, and, 6/9 (as June 30) for 1721, or 1271.
Another quick observation. Post #3454 = (5*691 -1) = [-1 + 691*(9 + 6 -10)] ---> 1691_1961, or 1961_1691.
Today, 07:47 PM #3454
TheGrimReaper
TheGrimReaper is invisible
Gold
TheGrimReaper's Avatar
Join Date
Sep 2022
Posts
181
Another theory about time in general, I have, is that it soon reverts back to the path it was on before diverted. My "conclusion", last year, was that my prediction about the Chiefs winnings fell short because I made it before the Bengals finished them off in a strange (overtime) game that involved the flip of a coin. This time, however, another blooper resulted in a Chief's win. To set things straight.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrimReaper
Anyway, to finish, I searched for my Superbowl posts from last year. It looks like Dan removed several posts around that time, too, except for one with a couple of anagrams with gematria. Again, I have no idea why he seems to pick out posts to delete without warning months later. I guess that part of the reason I came back, a few times, was to replenish my number of posts. To throw it back in his face. But, no matter, I copy and paste each into file as little works of a long-lost "art".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby
TheGrimReaper
TheGrimReaper is invisible
Gold
TheGrimReaper's Avatar
Join Date
Sep 2022
Posts
183 ------> 183 = 1 * √9 * 61 ---> 1961, or 1691, and, 2/7, or 2 July, the midpoint of non-leap years. Just like Oppsididitagain over at GF's. So, is this forum, too, finished yet?
Now I wonder about 183 as thus related to 1721, or 1271, and, [6 / √(900)] ---> 6/9, or June 30, with some days shifted from the latter part of the year, to the former about its midpoint, June 30. 183 = [1 + 2*7*1*(1*7*2 - 1)] ---> 1271_1721. So, perhaps, the way to go here is to end up with also its 6/9 doubled. Say, how about, √(6 + √9) = (9 - 6), so that 6/9 is inherently the same as 9/6, and, versa, with the latter? Something like this.
Oh, well, say what you want, but, I get "interesting" results. Ha.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGyOaCXr8Lw
Then, I wondered about the chance that it happened, in terms of a coincidence, or not. And, that it shouldn't be too hard to put a figure on it.
What's the chance of the first part (Kansas) of Kansas City Chiefs coming first in the first output line, and, then, the second part (Eagles) of Philadelphia Eagles coming first in the second output line, but, without the use of the letter 's' for either?
Luckily, Kan is a dictionary abbreviation of Kansas, and, so, it's a complete form of on its own without an 's'. And, the word, Eagle, is a straight-up word on its own without an 's'.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Kan
I counted 100 words including, and starting with, the word, Kan, in the Merriam Webster (online) dictionary, which has about 470,000 words defined.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/browse/dictionary/k/2Quote:
Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged, together with its 1993 Addenda Section, includes some 470,000 entries. The Oxford English Dictionary, Second Edition, reports that it includes a similar number.
I counted 16 words including, and starting with, the word, Eagle.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/browse/dictionary/e/1
This means that the straight-up chance of such an anagram-with-gematria solution, in terms of either parts of the names of the teams in either order, is probably quite close to [(100 * 16) / 470,000^2] = 7.24309642 × 10^-9, which is 1 in 138,062,500.
To factor in the order of finish of the teams, and, which parts of the names of each were used to reflect that order, then multiply the above chance by 0.5 * 0.5 * 0.5 = 0.125 , which leads to the overall chance of 9.05387053 × 10^-10, which is 1 in 1,104,500,000.
What likely makes things even less unlikely for the above is that the output lines ended with center, and, Ontario, as in the center of Ontario, say, Kitchener, which is sort of the "belly button" of the "elephant" that forms the outline of Southwestern Ontario by the great lakes. As well, that the word, Kandakadu, seems to be more of a family name than a place, the latter which is more likely to be found in a dictionary. In other words, a much larger dictionary would be required to add in only a few more thus family words, by which the straight-up likelihood above would be a lot less.
Thanks, MrV, for bringing up the SuperBowl in that reply. Ha.
Not much else to add, except that I noticed thatQuote:
Originally Posted by MisterVWhoa, a mind reader.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrimReaper
My ladder ball buddy is coming over to watch the game on my home theater, and pre-game we'll smoke some legal 28% THC cannabis and play ladder ball: the soggy ground has firmed up enough.
Garnabby: don't knock LB til you've tried it.
3456 = (2^7)*27 ---> 27_27, and, 3456 = 96*[√(900) + 6] ---> 96_96.
And, 3456 ---> 6543 = (7 + 2)*727 ---> 72727, and, 6543 = [96*(9 +60) +9^2] ---> 96969.
Also, (3456 + 6543) = 999 = 1*(37 - 10)*37 ---> 137_137, and, (6543 - 3456) = 3087 = 1*(3^2)*(7^3) ---> 137.
TheGrimReaper
TheGrimReaper is invisible
Gold
TheGrimReaper's Avatar
Join Date
Sep 2022
Posts
184 -----> 184 = (1 + 183) ---> 1/183, for the 184th day of leap years, which along with the 183rd day, forms the middle of the year.
Actually, the average life of a high roller is 2 - 3 years. Most blow out during exactly that time.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
A year, yes I have seen that, but not as typical as the 2 - 3 year model.
But it is unheard of for someone to play at max volume as I do and have done it all his life. Unless...he's beyond a billionaire. Or...winning.
Just that year where we spent 9 months straight in Vegas, the comps alone that we received, staying in average $2000. a night suites, not even counting all the RFB and special events, if based on actual loss (10%) would have cost in the neighborhood of a $5,000,000. loss. That's simply not sustainable, which is why whatever I get, I get via theoretical loss, which comes to 35% of theo.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/ques...-comp-machine/
Just keep your head above water, or win, and it's all free this week kid. I'll let you know when your time's up.
First:Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
we have only your word for this - as you and everybody else knows claims of astounding wins on a gambling forum are not often believable -
your experience is unique enough that it merits being documented by a respected writer or producer in a book or magazine or some kind of filming
that has not been done
maybe and probably you don't want that kind of doxxing - well, then the reality is - people just aren't going to believe your tales
I will concede that it is possible if you have some kind of unrevealed AP technique
Second:
your claims of constant and consecutive wins somewhere in the 5 figures all the while being adorned with luxurious comps by the casinos is just too much to swallow
are casino bosses stupid_____________?
are they going to continue giving you valuable free stuff after you have beaten them for $200K by winning in 5 figures on 10 consecutive days____________?
even if you are constantly changing casinos - you say you've been doing this your whole life - sooner or later they would have to catch on
I haven't been following the reports of your winnings closely but from when I did follow them the above statement seems fairly accurate
.
AP's are just a very strange bunch. Come to think of it, I can't recall a single post about, "Well, I had this job for 5 years, and that one for 10." But, suddenly they are the innate experts about every thing, including gambling, Covid shots, and, say, global warming. I mean, were everybody into vulturing slot machines, counting cards, and, players cards promotions, those guys would be left to "flipping burgers". I mean, how to get to 65, but, you never held any normal job? The truly great discoveries are made by the normal people with normal jobs. But, in terms of gambling claims, the person is never normal, and, infrequently, very well off.
Oh, Shackleford was a self-employed actuary, for a decade(?), to do with slot machine accounting for casinos, but, he openly admitted that he hated the "job". Which, I guess, meant that he couldn't find something better.
One of the greatest individual discoveries is finding the ability to live outside the system while feeding off of it's excesses. That is exactly what advantage play allows people to do. Some perform better than others but for most it provides a far better life than they could ever get from working a normal job.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Now get back to work, get your booster to keep your shitty job, pay 1/3-1/2 of your production in tax (Zelensky needs you}, and don't forget to give Hunter 10% for the pedo in charge.....RIP
That was during the trip where I won the DarkOz Challenge.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
https://i.imgur.com/TaJarhG.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/gaZKjwOh.jpg
Also during that period I was regularly showing casino checks marked "Verified Pit Winnings" to Wizard for verification, hundreds of thousands of dollars worth, until he finally declared that he didn't want to deal with it any longer, because someone at the forum was whining to him that his verifying the checks was too close to verifying my activity.
Here was one of the verifications he posted.
https://i.imgur.com/7cNsYCgh.jpg
Anyway, I have posted all of my session reports and along the way offered multiple challenges including the omnipresent MDawg Challenge for people to put up money if they think anything is false.
What happened here? Druff moved some posts so as to revive the Mdawg thread? Funny shit Dan Druff. :D
Mdog, if you are going to revive this claim that Wizard witnessed anything but a guy play a small progression for a single session to have a winning session which was 90% likely, for the purposes of winning a illi- conceived wager, nothing else, nothing long-trem, a short-term win for the purposes of a wager, then how about you release Wizard from this NDA you had him sign so he can finally say what he wants to say. If you have nothing to hide, then there is no need for an NDA.
Yeah.
And why in hell did the dawg ask the wiz to sign a NDA?
Fucking lawyers ...
Nothing was moved, let alone Druff, Druff trying to revive something. I had the last post, before MDawg bumped the thread. I even copied it onto the blog site, way back then. Post #3456, which I wrote out at the end of that post.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
3456 = (2^7)*27 ---> 27_27, and, 3456 = 96*[√(900) + 6] ---> 96_96.
And, 3456 ---> 6543 = (7 + 2)*727 ---> 72727, and, 6543 = [96*(9 +60) +9^2] ---> 96969.
Also, (3456 + 6543) = 999 = 1*(37 - 10)*37 ---> 137_137, and, (6543 - 3456) = 3087 = 1*(3^2)*(7^3) ---> 137.
Paranoia at its finest?
Mdawg is not stupid. He knew he would need to prevent Wizard from saying what he witnessed, which was a guy playing a small progression to end up with a winning session for the purposes of winning a wager. Such a player would have 85-90, maybe even 95% chance of succeeding in this short-term kind of situation, but he just could not have Wizard describe that this kind of short-term progression was in no way a long-term winning strategy, hence the NDA.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Had there been no NDA, Wizard would have immediately said what he later said when he broke the agreement, that this was no long-term winning strategy and that would have been the end of the great "adventure".
So it makes sense and was smart for Mdog to request Wizard agree to such terms. Now why the gambling math guy would agree to it, agree not to disclose what he witnessed, is what is beyond me and most others. In other words: was wizard sort of naively "played" or has he been complicit in this long running nonsense that Maxpen describes as "making a mockery of everything this site is supposed to stand for."
What was the point of the wiz witnessing the play if a NDA prevented him from describing what he observed?
He just went along with the rules promulgated by the dawg and darkoz and pocketed five hundred bucks for his troubles.
Ka-ching ... at the expense of credibility and transparency.
That's relative, in the sense, say, that motion is relative. You can't tell which of two celestial bodies is moving, or moving more, but, only how fast they are moving with respect to each other. But, the exertion of the force of acceleration causes a time dilatation for (only) the body undergoing the thus exertion. In other words, it comes down to the analogous exertion, in whichever form, to set the real winners apart from the real losers. So, in the case of the AP's, what the heck are they really changing? Being apart from the world while it marches ahead is hardly an achievement, whether a voluntary action. Just a fantasy, internal narrative of things.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Must be the LSD, but, didn't you initially write that you knew of a couple of twenty-year olds who were set for life, after only a couple years of AP? Regardless, "set for life is a funny" thing because most of us were "set for life", a long time ago, already had enough. Who really needs millions? I mean, no one can extend your life beyond the genetics/environments already involved. Better medical care may prevent it from ending prematurely, but, in the grand scheme of things, what can that, either, really achieve? Perhaps, an additional couple of years that you shouldn't have had, anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Real work provides for real structure of one's time and effort. Where would the world be without it? Psychology-101 experiments show where: a bunch of lazy assholes in La La Land, a place not too far off this one. Conspiracists at best, left to such useless theories, to try to convince themselves that anything they do matters, nay, means everything.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
EXACTLY!!Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
I know I have at times said some nasty shit about Wizard. I like Michael Shackleford. I like his story, that he left the corporate working world to pursue his dream. And it worked out extremely well when he sold his business (website and forum) for a tidy sum. I think he was lucky in that regard, but still good for him.
The one thing I would like to know more about is his AP play before he sold his forum. Some of his haters call him a failed AP. I am quite sure he is not and they just have no idea what he did. He recently called himself a card counter for 37 years. That peeked my interest and I discussed it with him. I know he doesn't do much card counting any more. Who does? 15 years ago there were 100''s of card counters in Vegas, today it is a dozen? 20? I don't know I guess it depends on what stakes you are including.
BUT, Mike has really changed in the last 6-8 years. And that directly coincides with the time period of the sale of his business. he just doesn't seem to care anymore. Not about the math that he was always so passionate about. Wizard of 10-12 years ago, just never would have allowed this Mdawg shit to go down like this. He just wouldn't have. :confused:
And actually, that Wizard of 10-12 years ago duidn't let it go down with this same character...different name/handle. :D
You claim to know a lot about everybody who has punished you. But EVERYBODY knows you are a habitual liar--about yourself and them.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
You've turned into a whipping post kew. And you no more "support yourself" from bj than baby bro does from sucking on your big toe.
Yet, I personally thoroughly enjoy watching you continually come unglued over what mdawg reports, and how you're SOOOO hurt about wizard's acquaintance with him.
Cry me a river.
Just more 10x multiplier, I'm on
and can't shut down my manic brain, responses, that just show how crazy he is.
One of the more annoying habits of this mental defect is that he gets a notion in his head, misconnects the dots in some fashion that satisfies his pea brain, and then is off to the races. No doubt we'll be hearing ad nauseam now of this theory of his that MaxPen is giving MDawg the benefit of the doubt only because Wizard told him that MDawg is a good person, and so on.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Once this creep gets an idea, he can't let go of it.
Or let go of any of his lies.
At least he hasn't reiterated lie # (5) lately,
because he's afraid to bring it up in the context of how he's been outed on at least eight other lies so far. Things are a wee hot right now for the little Pac Islander, and he's probably already wondering how he got pushed to the point of disavowing the existence of his "soul mate."Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfThat's absolutely true.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
But that's the nature of a pathological ailment...it involves doing things that are regrettable, but done without control or stops.
Here we go UNKewlJ, let's see a collection of your red and green chips that you keep in that shopping cart you push in the Vegas underground sewers.
https://i.imgur.com/JbXpQTIl.jpg
And awaaaay we go...with a 10X multiplier on the way!
I like this. I hate the Mdawg thread active again that I can point out all the absurdities posted. :)
Today in mirror thread at WoV, Mdawg mentioned some new tournaments and offers and said "They always want to lure me back".
So let me ask you MaxPen, is that the way it works? Do casinos try to lure APs and winning players back or do they try to lure known losing players back? As myself and many AP's know from first hand experience one of the first counter-measures against winning players is that the casinos STOP all the offers.
It is just like the playing rated, using casino credit and requesting checks. These are all things that ploppie type losing players do, NOT winning players and for obvious reasons.
This guy Mdog, doesn't even seem to realize that all the things he says and claims screams losing player.
Unlike real winning players who play unrated, Mdog plays rated, just like the losing players can and do.
Unlike real winning players that play cash so as not to provide info, Mdog provides his info and uses casino credit, just like losing players do.
Unlike real winning players who get "no mailed" fairly quickly, Mdog keeps getting new offers just like all the losing players do.
The guy is a losing player! He may win some sessions and days, but overall a losing player and that's why he can do these things that losing players do and the casinos still welcome and want him. When casinos identify this kind of losing player, they try to hold on for dear life. :cool:
What do you think this proves, other than you have a Napolean complex.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Since you switch over to tranny hookers after the coochi watch stealing incident, it must be awkward for you having a hooker with a much larger dick. :cool:
Welcome to the Adventures of MDawg!
Even the homeless are not shut out.
https://i.imgur.com/pb4srmsm.jpg
The discussion about what could be going on is not a public forum discussion. There's really nothing further to be said about it. So you don't have to ask me anything about it. Because I don't have a definitive answer and I'm not going to publicly speculate.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Oh yeah,, don't bother asking me in a PM either. :cool:
Ok so, I have no idea what you are talking about. Apparently because nothing this guys posts has ever made any sense, there are a group of you privately discussing what "could" be going on. I am guessing money laundering kind of thing. If he is stupid enough to have been doing something like that while posting, he is a real idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenThe discussion about what could be going on is not a public forum discussion. There's really nothing further to be said about it. So you don't have to ask me anything about it. Because I don't have a definitive answer and I'm not going to publicly speculate.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Oh yeah,, don't bother asking me in a PM either. :cool:
Now I don't really care. All I ever said and this is verbatim is that the story, as he was telling it was not true. There was never a doubt that he was leaving something out. What that may be, legal or not I don't care. I just knew that as it was told and still is, the story is not true. And this much you seem to be almost confirming. So what are you giving me such shit about?
Doesn't take much to push a manicover the edge!Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
https://i.imgur.com/B4ClLG0m.jpg
coochi, coochi Fake Rolex. :cool:
Find my post in the Money Laundering or MD thread with the Video Things that make you say Hmmm....Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWhat do you think this proves, other than you have a Napolean complex.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Since you switch over to tranny hookers after the coochi watch stealing incident, it must be awkward for you having a hooker with a much larger dick. :cool:
Then see his response.
Anyways there are oodles of things MDawg has claimed that don't ring true.
Opinion is one thing.
But someone comes along and asks for a player to "show me the CTR" as if a CTR is a piece of paper a player would ever receive, that shows rank ignorance. And that same person thinking that a player who just won 7 figures would cash out for other than cage check or bank wire in the first place, also shows ignorance of the ways things are.
Given that sort of ignorance, AxelWolf isn't fit to judge the ways and means of high rollers, any more than our red to green chip friend.
https://i.imgur.com/Y1MBYXwh.png
I have read the money laundering thread. I am aware of everything said. I am also well aware that NOTHING rings true. Hasn't from day 1. And it has only gotten worse.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfFind my post in the Money Laundering or MD thread with the Video Things that make you say Hmmm....Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWhat do you think this proves, other than you have a Napolean complex.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Since you switch over to tranny hookers after the coochi watch stealing incident, it must be awkward for you having a hooker with a much larger dick. :cool:
Then see his response.
Anyways there are oodles of things MDawg has claimed that don't ring true.
Here is a big clue to what the great "adventure" really is about. Axelwolf, Maxpen, anybody....when you make a post or start a thread, do you frequenty check and obsess over how many views it has? Whether it is the top thread? if it is the first thread that shows when you google WoV? Do you check alexa ratings? (whatever that is). Do you keep track of whether the forum is more active when you are posting vs when you are suspended?
Mdawg does and has talked about all these things. No real player sharing anything does that or cares about these things. This is a guy after attention or whatnot.
Add that to the fact that he posts his story and claims simultaneously at 4 forums, one of which is a forum for writers, people writing stories and you begin to see it is more about the writing of the story than anything factual or not.
Now that is the writing of the story and claims part. He does appear to play Las Vegas and play reasonably high stakes. And along with that comes all the comps that a ploppie type losing player would get. Now if there is something else going on, like the whole deal is a money laundering thing, well, I don't really care or even want to know to much. All I have said from Day 1, is the story as told is not real.
This is a person out to impress. He tells you about the $100 polos that he buys. He told us of $50 toothpaste for God sakes. And the watches. I don't own a watch. Haven't since maybe Jr high. Not a watch guy. I'll let you guys decide if they are fake or real, but either way, it is an attempt to impress people. That is really what the whole story is.
This isn't a story of a guy gambling. This is like a written version of a Hollywood movie of which is he so obsessed with. It is all fantasy shit.
What makes us laugh though is that UNKewlLyingJ keeps going on and on with the long-winded, rambling drama-laced "I NEED TO set the record straight or I'll go OUT OF MY MIND!" paragraphs that never seem to satisfy, as he then repeats the same things over and over again, still thinking that anyone is listening or cares.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
I haven't read any money laundering thread. But that is one possibility.
I've always played with casino credit only.
The threads I wrote were about how casinos employ anti money laundering measures, and then bumblers like AxelWolf came in to try to claim that casinos don't always follow the rules or that this or that might be possible, when the guy has zero experience with getting casino cage checks for table games or with casino credit, period.
The point of my threads was that a credit only table game player is issued a cage check, for example
https://i.imgur.com/GQrM6NIl.jpg
only for a verified win. Not a topic I feel like getting into for a whole new audience, but it's all laid out here:
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-...nd-compliance/
Why do you take a physical check for your winning trip?
That's actually kind of strange. Is it not?
Well, if the win is say in the single digit thousands or maybe double digit thousands cash is fine, but my wins especially spread over a trip are much higher so I'm not going to pull that much cash out, all I'd have to do is deposit it right back into the bank. Plus just storing that much cash becomes a problem, you'd have to keep getting a larger and larger safety deposit box at the hotel (the in room wall safes at some of these hotels are rather small).
So I generally get a check and also for quarter or so million wins I've asked for a wire too.
I have pulled as much as $100K out in one session for a win,
https://i.imgur.com/5qNbiBxm.jpg
but usually anything over twenty or so K I ask for a check, and I've gotten checks for under 10K wins too.
As mentioned, I play credit only. I might come to Vegas with $1000. cash, but that is just for tips or minor expenses.
I pull markers from my lines. When I get a check, it represents a net win after paying all markers off, obviously.
You DO know that you're killing him with this stuff. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
He can't say they're fake, he can't say they're not yours, so he's left with "he loses more than he wins".
I too would like to see kews collection of red & green chips. But I'll bet he lost them....
Quote:
Originally Posted by ;97135
Quote:
Originally Posted by ;97243
Quote:
Originally Posted by ;97296
Quote:
Originally Posted by ;97325
Quote:
Originally Posted by ;97333
Quote:
Originally Posted by ;97348
Quote:
Originally Posted by ;97349
Some interesting posts, don't you think Rob?Quote:
Originally Posted by ;97391
Yes these quotes are all from Rob Singer on pages 1-5 of this very thread. Apparently Rob wasn't impressed by the pictures of chips a few years ago but is now.
Also of particular interest to me was Rob questioning why casinos let him keep winning, comping him and allowing him to come back for more. The very question I have asked for 4 years now. :rolleyes: Rob says: "That does not and would not happen". Period.
Rob of course was right in this case. Rob being right is known as the broken clock theory. (but that is another topic.)
Don't most people just have funds win or lose sent back to their funding account via wire transfer at the completion of a trip?Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
What's the purpose of carrying cash during your stay if you don't come with cash to begin with?
Maxpen, do you no longer read WoV? You don't seem to know what is going on there. Can I fill you in?
First this casino check topic is something that has been discussed and argued about between Mdawg and axelwolf for some time off and on. So the only reason it came up this particular time is because Mdawg wanted to change the topic to deflect from Wizard calling him out on the whole $100-$5000 spread, 10 hour post 2 weeks ago. So Mdawg immediately deflected back to this topic complete with challenges.
Mdawg likes to post pictures of casino checks claiming that only winning players can get casino checks and only for the amount won (no buy-in amount included). Axelwolf has a different position that there are a number of ways to get casino checks.
So here is what I beleive Mdawg is doing: Plays off his line of credit. If he loses he can pay off the line of credit debt from other money, just as any player that plays off credit and loses would.
But if he has a winning session, day, or couple of days, he pays off the line of credit and requests a casino check for the winnings, and shows it on line and I guess to Wizard as proof that he is a winning player. :D
So a check means nothing more than chips or cash. It in no ways proves whether you are a winning player or not. It means you had a winning session, day or couple of days. But I have seen no one argue that he doesn't win sometimes. EVERY gambler has some winning days.
The fact that this guy goes to great lengths to do these things, says everything. Even Rob figured that out 170 pages ago. :D
Possibility but very likely. A criminal of those means would not ever be writing about it on the internet.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Mdawg either has family money or is a badass lawyer or hit some other huuge lick in his life. Who knows.
I am not sure how I can have less respect for Kewl. The dude keeps hammering about some story not being true but many of us never believed it. Yet he told lies just as improbable but won't address them. Oh yea, they're just "opinions" unlike Kewl's opinion.
He is an unrepentant liar.
$100 polos? are you shitting me? He spends that much on a shirt !?!??!?!?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Mdawg - is it true? Do you really have that much money?
Wow what info Kewl. You got it dialed in. Fuck! I am going to start listening to you again.
This was explained so you quoting without giving the back story or future commentary. You will notice he himself couldn't answer the question. IIRC there was something fishy regarding his claim in the end. System error or something like that? I don't know, there are many ways to make it seem as if you are winning or losing. There are fucked up systems, incorrect data inputs, etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Whatever the case I did and do know what SARS and CTRs' were and how they worked and meant for, before and at the time. I can provide evidence of this if you want to pony up some money.
There are some things you know about. Such as low end hustling at Ellis Island. There are many things you don't know about, such as high end play, high end comps, or anything to do with casino checks, credit lines. To a small extent you may understand loss rebates but not at the level I have negotiated them and I guarantee you have never in your entire life been able to negotiate different rules on a table game the way I do.
Just the fact that you think that the pit could make a mistake in a seven figure direction with SiegFriedRoy shows how little you know about any of this.
Which is fine. To each his own.
But when you waste my time going on and on about things you know little about, you essentially become another UNKewlJ.
First of all, as stated, I am a credit line player. So I don't fund anything I play off casino credit.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Yes I do have multiple bank accounts on file with the casinos, and if I like I can ask them to wire me the winnings instead of giving me a check or cash, but there is no "sent back" I am not a front money player.
"What's the purpose of carrying cash during your stay if you don't come with cash to begin with?" I am not sure I understand that question. First you asked why would you take your winnings via check (implying that I should take them via cash?), now you are asking why would you take any winnings in cash?
So why bother getting a check, just have the winnings sent via wire transfer.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgFirst of all, as stated, I am a credit line player. So I don't fund anything I play off casino credit.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Yes I do have multiple bank accounts on file with the casinos, and if I like I can ask them to wire me the winnings instead of giving me a check or cash, but there is no "sent back" I am not a front money player.
"What's the purpose of carrying cash during your stay if you don't come with cash to begin with?" I am not sure I understand that question. First you asked why would you take your winnings via check (implying that I should take them via cash?), now you are asking why would you take any winnings in cash?
I've had wires sent quickly (the next day) and I've had the cage sit on a wire for a week until I had to keep calling them to get them to send it. At least with the check you know you're getting it right then and there and there won't be any issue.
I'm generally cashing out a lot of winning chips at the end of a stay and you don't want to give them a week to consider pulling a Phil Ivey on you.
Chips are good.
https://i.imgur.com/8kEZ4H1l.jpg
And so is cash.
https://i.imgur.com/wlxBYZBl.jpg
This alcoholic's memory is as bad as UNKewlJ's math. Obviously he thinks that being able to know the cards that fall from a deck is "ludicrous" because he can't even remember 1/10 of what he reads or happened last week.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
The claim I made was
How about if that person puts up a good sum for a challenge, just a single deck for demonstration purposes. Wizard can deal a one on one game against me, normal speed, half way through the deck I will write down every card that has been played, in terms of each type of card, aces, 2s, 3s, etc. or more detail if the challenger so requires. The more detail, the more he had better put up.
I'd name the number I have in mind for the challenge, but then that person would probably say that I am naming an absurdly high number just to scare him off.
https://i.imgur.com/YqtsD1uh.jpg
and the Wizard himself backed it up:
Based on this and other posts, maybe this talent is more of a 1 in 1,000 kind of thing than one in a million. Whatever the proportion of the population that has such a memory, I'm not a part of it. I don't buy combination locks, because I can never commit the combination to memory. So, I'll retract that point.
https://i.imgur.com/vT8cERMh.jpg
after he realized that the claim isn't all that extraordinary, after a couple members like UnJon and TigerWu stepped up to say that they could do it too or that they knew people who could do it.
There are players who can memorize six decks, every card that has landed.
Nico was playing six decks "only" apparently. ;)
Nico Zoographic
Nicolas “Nicky the Greek” Zoographic is a famous baccarat player who lived during the early twentieth century. He was a member of a group of gamblers who toured European casinos. They made a fortune playing high-stakes games of baccarat, and Zoographic was renowned for his memorization skills and mathematical abilities. His memory allowed him to memorize every card in a baccarat game and alerted his team when the odds were in their favor.
During the early 20th century, Zoographic was a member of the Greek Syndicate, which controlled all baccarat tables. He had an amazing memory, and he was able to remember the order of three dozen cards when played with six decks. Zoographic also had an amazing ability to gauge fluctuations in odds in favor of the bank, and he was able to make the best bets according to that information.
Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
Completely untrue. Another example of AxelWolf alcohol hazed poor recollection nonsense.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
After Wolf kept shooting his mouth off about that my stock trades were fabricated or that the WIN statements I posted were not genuine, I proposed at least two wagers to the Wolf, and he declined both of them.
On the one wager,
250K Wager
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-...rs/#post796763
he started singing the tune of that "the stock trades must be genuine but someone else must be posting them."
and on the other 500K wager, that involves the genuineness of my Vegas WIN statements,
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-.../3/#post797552
he started pretending as if he didn't read it and that anyway, he doesn't have 500K to wager.
The one wager where he claims that I backed down,
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gamb...lf/#post787357
was where I offered to pay anyone $5000. who could create an Adventures thread like mine
which would include:
-stacks of cash
-stacks of chips
-millions of dollars in paid off markers
-casino checks issued for wins
-pictures and videos of high end timepieces
-pictures of winning Baccarat shoes
-pictures of large Vegas high roller suites
-pictures of gourmets meal eaten at casino resort restaurants
-pictures of the television screen inside the suites, and paper folios, that prove full RFB comps.
-actual video of WIN statements while logged in live to player card accounts to substantiate all alleged wins
where everything was FAKED.
As always, mostly due to his poor reading skills but also due to that he is a “greedy scrambler” as Monet calls him, AxelWolf came back with some version of what he THOUGHT was proposed and then started crying when I said No, that’s not what I proposed and I said that I wouldn’t pay him anything for doing something entirely different from the challenge I wrote up in the first place. The issue was that Axel proposed creating a thread centered around some trips he had at low end casinos outside of Vegas, and said that this would satisfy the wager. I said No, the wager is that you claim that you could create something where everything was entirely faked, where there were NO casino stays, NO genuine chips, NO real cash, NO casino play, NO comp’ing, all fabricated fake, not some genuine adventures but at a low end casino!
I mean we’re talking about an idiot who didn’t realize that a marker with the signature torn out of it must have been paid –
https://i.imgur.com/FyFnGFl.png
actually had no idea what a marker is or how they work, obviously, and had the audacity to claim that he could come up with an Adventures thread that mimicked mine but was entirely fake.
Wolf has a habit of trying to alter Challenges to suit what he thinks was said. For example more recently I made this Challenge proposal
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gamb...72/#post895875
How about if you go deposit $9000. cash at the cage at Wynn, go play a few hands of whatever, such that your win or loss is in the hundreds of dollars only, and then go back to the cage and get one check for the entire withdrawal - the $9000. plus or minus the few hundred.
and of course Wolf came back with some nonsense “moving the goalposts” as SooPoo put it, about getting a check at a casino for something or other that had nothing to do with my challenge or verified winnings.
Wolf does this sort of thing frequently, mostly because he is a poor reader and suffers from ADD intensified by alcoholism, but also because he’s greedily anxious to create some sort of wager where he is assured a win, even if it has nothing to do with what was proposed originally by the challenger.
As far as BACKING OUT from an offer, the only person who has done this verifiably is the Wolf himself, when he offered unilaterally sight unseen to buy Wizard’s watch, and then reneged, saying he would perform “only if it’s a good deal.”
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gamb...35/#post785630
https://i.imgur.com/jtJyKZch.jpg
Even before he took a powder on that, I predicted it
https://i.imgur.com/LzIRkINh.jpg
and I was right!
Bottom line, between the two of us, it is the Wolf who has verifiably written checks with his mouth that he couldn't cash.
Only one of these 10 items has any value at all as far as proving anything. I will address each separately in a moment. But before I do a couple other things. Yes here I am posting about this shit. Call me a gluten for punishment or whatever names you want to substitute. What I really am is a gluten or more accurately passionate about not allowing this bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Second thing, thinking he had dispatched me, because I have grown weary of this battle and foolishness, Mdawg immediately turned his sights and attacks toward Axelwolf, saying anything and everything he can come up with to try to discredit Axelwolf, just as he did me before. This guy's (mdawgs) bullshit story can gain no tractions, zero, unless he can discredit every real player, professional or recreational, that knows his story in it's entirety is bullshit because it is not how Las Vegas, or the gambling industry works. He must discredit, or try to, every single person that speaks up. Hense, the list of more than a dozen individual members that he attempted to discredit a the forum he promotes at the bottom of his page.
Third thing and this is just too funny to not direct people to. Post #3500, just a few posts back (bottom of last page). It is 2 pictures. I won't even describe it. Just take a look. That is Narcissism at it's epitome. Nothing else need be said.
Now these 10 items that I feel the need to address:
1. -stacks of cash
This proves NOTHING, except that the person has access to some cash. Doesn't even have to be their cash, just that they have access to some cash. Or you could pull a Rob Singer and buy some movie prop money if you don't have the real cash. In the case of Mdawg, no one is disputing that he has access to some real cash and in pretty high quanities. Posting pictures of cash proves nothing in regards to wins or losses.
2. -stacks of chips
Same as above. Pictures of chips proves the poster has access to some cash and purchased or bought in for chips. Proves nothing about wins or losses. Even posting a picture of say $45,00 in chips. What does that mean? Person could have bought in for $75,000 and lost $30,000 and be posting $45.000. Just proves NOTHING.
3. -millions of dollars in paid off markers
This also proves nothing about wins or losses. 2 examples. Player takes out a marker. Plays, is fortunate enough to win (all players win some time....it is called variance) and pays off the marker. All that proved is he won a session just like all players +EV or even the worse -EV degenerate gambler sometimes do. Example 2, player takes about a marker and losses. He then withdraws more money from his accounts to pay off marker. He can now prove he paid off the marker. Again, proves nothing. In this case he actually lost and still paid off marker.
4. -casino checks issued for wins
Axelwolf and a few others already proved that a player can get casino checks for more than just the winning portion of play. But lets just go with the idea that Mdawg wanted to convey that having a casino issued check means the player won. FOR THAT SESSION! Again, player takes out marker every day. On days he wins (variance) he re-pays marker and requests check for winnings. On days he losses, he pays of marker from his bank account or other funds. At the end of 20 days he could have 5 or 6 casino checks and have a total loss of hundreds of thousands. Proves nothing, but this was a slick one of Mdawgs attempts, I will give him that.
5. -pictures and videos of high end timepieces
This has what to do with gambling winnings? I will just say more narcissism and need to impress and leave it at that.
6. -pictures of winning Baccarat shoes
Don't even know what exactly this means or where he showed this.
7. -pictures of large Vegas high roller suites
Big Losing players are the players most often comped high roller suites. Proves nothing about wins or losses though. Proves that player put a lot of action in. Not sure where anyone questioned that he plays a lot and puts a lot of money in action. Also see $5. An element of narcissism to this.
8. pictures of gourmets meal eaten at casino resort restaurants
This one is gross in that he has often posted pictures of half eaten food. Other than that, again, shows an element of narcissism, but proves NOTHING about wins or losses.
9. -pictures of the television screen inside the suites, and paper folios, that prove full RFB comps.
If real, like all comps this proves a player put in a certain amount of action, which no one is disputing. Proves NOTHING about winning or losing.
10. -actual video of WIN statements while logged in live to player card accounts to substantiate all alleged wins
And finally #10. This has some value if real. But because so many things can be doctored or fake (just take a look at Rob Singers postings), to have any real value this would need to be confirmed by someone to prove that it was legit. Without that it is no different than a picture of a guy behind the steering wheel of an RV at the RV showroom.
Conclusion: These things prove nothing. NOTHING at all, except maybe the player gambles at higher stakes which no one is disputing. Well actually most of us aren't disputing that. There is someone I won't mention (he can if he wants) that has the theory that Mdawg is just has access to someone eles's situation, a friend or family member or employer who is actually the high roller. That seems a stretch to me, but shows the possibilities. These things just don't prove anything. And stacking multiple things that don't prove anything on top of one another, doesn't change that. Just the same as playing multiple losing strategies (-EV) does not make for a winning strategy.
But a real winning strategy or play is not what this has ever been about. This has always been about Mdawg overwhelming with enough bullshit that it almost seems believable. And he would have succeeded if there weren't people like me and Axelwolf and those dozen other real players that he started individual threads attempting to discredit, and even the people that just chime in once in a while.
Now lets hear the response like "OMG, he posted when he said he wouldn't" and that crap, instead of focusing on the reality of this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJOnly one of these 10 items has any value at all as far as proving anything. I will address each separately in a moment. But before I do a couple other things. Yes here I am posting about this shit. Call me a gluten for punishment or whatever names you want to substitute. What I really am is a gluten or more accurately passionate about not allowing this bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Second thing, thinking he had dispatched me, because I have grown weary of this battle and foolishness, Mdawg immediately turned his sights and attacks toward Axelwolf, saying anything and everything he can come up with to try to discredit Axelwolf, just as he did me before. This guy's (mdawgs) bullshit story can gain no tractions, zero, unless he can discredit every real player, professional or recreational, that knows his story in it's entirety is bullshit because it is not how Las Vegas, or the gambling industry works. He must discredit, or try to, every single person that speaks up. Hense, the list of more than a dozen individual members that he attempted to discredit a the forum he promotes at the bottom of his page.
Third thing and this is just too funny to not direct people to. Post #3500, just a few posts back (bottom of last page). It is 2 pictures. I won't even describe it. Just take a look. That is Narcissism at it's epitome. Nothing else need be said.
Now these 10 items that I feel the need to address:
1. -stacks of cash
This proves NOTHING, except that the person has access to some cash. Doesn't even have to be their cash, just that they have access to some cash. Or you could pull a Rob Singer and buy some movie prop money if you don't have the real cash. In the case of Mdawg, no one is disputing that he has access to some real cash and in pretty high quanities. Posting pictures of cash proves nothing in regards to wins or losses.
2. -stacks of chips
Same as above. Pictures of chips proves the poster has access to some cash and purchased or bought in for chips. Proves nothing about wins or losses. Even posting a picture of say $45,00 in chips. What does that mean? Person could have bought in for $75,000 and lost $30,000 and be posting $45.000. Just proves NOTHING.
3. -millions of dollars in paid off markers
This also proves nothing about wins or losses. 2 examples. Player takes out a marker. Plays, is fortunate enough to win (all players win some time....it is called variance) and pays off the marker. All that proved is he won a session just like all players +EV or even the worse -EV degenerate gambler sometimes do. Example 2, player takes about a marker and losses. He then withdraws more money from his accounts to pay off marker. He can now prove he paid off the marker. Again, proves nothing. In this case he actually lost and still paid off marker.
4. -casino checks issued for wins
Axelwolf and a few others already proved that a player can get casino checks for more than just the winning portion of play. But lets just go with the idea that Mdawg wanted to convey that having a casino issued check means the player won. FOR THAT SESSION! Again, player takes out marker every day. On days he wins (variance) he re-pays marker and requests check for winnings. On days he losses, he pays of marker from his bank account or other funds. At the end of 20 days he could have 5 or 6 casino checks and have a total loss of hundreds of thousands. Proves nothing, but this was a slick one of Mdawgs attempts, I will give him that.
5. -pictures and videos of high end timepieces
This has what to do with gambling winnings? I will just say more narcissism and need to impress and leave it at that.
6. -pictures of winning Baccarat shoes
Don't even know what exactly this means or where he showed this.
7. -pictures of large Vegas high roller suites
Big Losing players are the players most often comped high roller suites. Proves nothing about wins or losses though. Proves that player put a lot of action in. Not sure where anyone questioned that he plays a lot and puts a lot of money in action. Also see $5. An element of narcissism to this.
8. pictures of gourmets meal eaten at casino resort restaurants
This one is gross in that he has often posted pictures of half eaten food. Other than that, again, shows an element of narcissism, but proves NOTHING about wins or losses.
9. -pictures of the television screen inside the suites, and paper folios, that prove full RFB comps.
If real, like all comps this proves a player put in a certain amount of action, which no one is disputing. Proves NOTHING about winning or losing.
10. -actual video of WIN statements while logged in live to player card accounts to substantiate all alleged wins
And finally #10. This has some value if real. But because so many things can be doctored or fake (just take a look at Rob Singers postings), to have any real value this would need to be confirmed by someone to prove that it was legit. Without that it is no different than a picture of a guy behind the steering wheel of an RV at the RV showroom.
Conclusion: These things prove nothing. NOTHING at all, except maybe the player gambles at higher stakes which no one is disputing. Well actually most of us aren't disputing that. There is someone I won't mention (he can if he wants) that has the theory that Mdawg is just has access to someone eles's situation, a friend or family member or employer who is actually the high roller. That seems a stretch to me, but shows the possibilities. These things just don't prove anything. And stacking multiple things that don't prove anything on top of one another, doesn't change that. Just the same as playing multiple losing strategies (-EV) does not make for a winning strategy.
But a real winning strategy or play is not what this has ever been about. This has always been about Mdawg overwhelming with enough bullshit that it almost seems believable. And he would have succeeded if there weren't people like me and Axelwolf and those dozen other real players that he started individual threads attempting to discredit, and even the people that just chime in once in a while.
Now lets hear the response like "OMG, he posted when he said he wouldn't" and that crap, instead of focusing on the reality of this.
Go respond to my challenge fraudj. Once you accept I will Pm Druff here with the phone number of my runner who will meet him with the money at dans convenience. Unlike you I don’t have all day to be on these gay ass message boards I have money to make.
Buddy for a guy who loves to complain about how this forum is not about proving things you sure do try.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJOnly one of these 10 items has any value at all as far as proving anything. I will address each separately in a moment. But before I do a couple other things. Yes here I am posting about this shit. Call me a gluten for punishment or whatever names you want to substitute. What I really am is a gluten or more accurately passionate about not allowing this bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Second thing, thinking he had dispatched me, because I have grown weary of this battle and foolishness, Mdawg immediately turned his sights and attacks toward Axelwolf, saying anything and everything he can come up with to try to discredit Axelwolf, just as he did me before. This guy's (mdawgs) bullshit story can gain no tractions, zero, unless he can discredit every real player, professional or recreational, that knows his story in it's entirety is bullshit because it is not how Las Vegas, or the gambling industry works. He must discredit, or try to, every single person that speaks up. Hense, the list of more than a dozen individual members that he attempted to discredit a the forum he promotes at the bottom of his page.
Third thing and this is just too funny to not direct people to. Post #3500, just a few posts back (bottom of last page). It is 2 pictures. I won't even describe it. Just take a look. That is Narcissism at it's epitome. Nothing else need be said.
Now these 10 items that I feel the need to address:
1. -stacks of cash
This proves NOTHING, except that the person has access to some cash. Doesn't even have to be their cash, just that they have access to some cash. Or you could pull a Rob Singer and buy some movie prop money if you don't have the real cash. In the case of Mdawg, no one is disputing that he has access to some real cash and in pretty high quanities. Posting pictures of cash proves nothing in regards to wins or losses.
2. -stacks of chips
Same as above. Pictures of chips proves the poster has access to some cash and purchased or bought in for chips. Proves nothing about wins or losses. Even posting a picture of say $45,00 in chips. What does that mean? Person could have bought in for $75,000 and lost $30,000 and be posting $45.000. Just proves NOTHING.
3. -millions of dollars in paid off markers
This also proves nothing about wins or losses. 2 examples. Player takes out a marker. Plays, is fortunate enough to win (all players win some time....it is called variance) and pays off the marker. All that proved is he won a session just like all players +EV or even the worse -EV degenerate gambler sometimes do. Example 2, player takes about a marker and losses. He then withdraws more money from his accounts to pay off marker. He can now prove he paid off the marker. Again, proves nothing. In this case he actually lost and still paid off marker.
4. -casino checks issued for wins
Axelwolf and a few others already proved that a player can get casino checks for more than just the winning portion of play. But lets just go with the idea that Mdawg wanted to convey that having a casino issued check means the player won. FOR THAT SESSION! Again, player takes out marker every day. On days he wins (variance) he re-pays marker and requests check for winnings. On days he losses, he pays of marker from his bank account or other funds. At the end of 20 days he could have 5 or 6 casino checks and have a total loss of hundreds of thousands. Proves nothing, but this was a slick one of Mdawgs attempts, I will give him that.
5. -pictures and videos of high end timepieces
This has what to do with gambling winnings? I will just say more narcissism and need to impress and leave it at that.
6. -pictures of winning Baccarat shoes
Don't even know what exactly this means or where he showed this.
7. -pictures of large Vegas high roller suites
Big Losing players are the players most often comped high roller suites. Proves nothing about wins or losses though. Proves that player put a lot of action in. Not sure where anyone questioned that he plays a lot and puts a lot of money in action. Also see $5. An element of narcissism to this.
8. pictures of gourmets meal eaten at casino resort restaurants
This one is gross in that he has often posted pictures of half eaten food. Other than that, again, shows an element of narcissism, but proves NOTHING about wins or losses.
9. -pictures of the television screen inside the suites, and paper folios, that prove full RFB comps.
If real, like all comps this proves a player put in a certain amount of action, which no one is disputing. Proves NOTHING about winning or losing.
10. -actual video of WIN statements while logged in live to player card accounts to substantiate all alleged wins
And finally #10. This has some value if real. But because so many things can be doctored or fake (just take a look at Rob Singers postings), to have any real value this would need to be confirmed by someone to prove that it was legit. Without that it is no different than a picture of a guy behind the steering wheel of an RV at the RV showroom.
Conclusion: These things prove nothing. NOTHING at all, except maybe the player gambles at higher stakes which no one is disputing. Well actually most of us aren't disputing that. There is someone I won't mention (he can if he wants) that has the theory that Mdawg is just has access to someone eles's situation, a friend or family member or employer who is actually the high roller. That seems a stretch to me, but shows the possibilities. These things just don't prove anything. And stacking multiple things that don't prove anything on top of one another, doesn't change that. Just the same as playing multiple losing strategies (-EV) does not make for a winning strategy.
But a real winning strategy or play is not what this has ever been about. This has always been about Mdawg overwhelming with enough bullshit that it almost seems believable. And he would have succeeded if there weren't people like me and Axelwolf and those dozen other real players that he started individual threads attempting to discredit, and even the people that just chime in once in a while.
Now lets hear the response like "OMG, he posted when he said he wouldn't" and that crap, instead of focusing on the reality of this.
Gotta wonder what induces a supposedly successful guy like the dawg to post boatloads of pictures designed to reinforce his claim that he is The Man.
It would be comical were it not ... sad.
Yes, sad.
I cry crocodile tears for this chump and his neurotic need for affirmation.
Still waiting for photos of his LV mansion...
*sips coffee, pets mechanical cat*
I was hoping Mdawg would deny that he ever posted about the Mansion. But he is too smart for that. While he has scrubbed the post away so no one can see it now, he can't be sure who saw it and might have a screenshot just waiting for him to hang himself. So he doesn't deny. He just ignores. I know for a fact redietz saw the post because he commented on things at that forum. I am sure there are others beside myself and Half Smoke, that just no longer wish to waste time, much the same that Half Smoke has decided.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Now here is why that mention of the mansion matters at all. And how it came to be what it is today. It matter just like Singer's RV shit mattered, because while separate from the ridiculous gambling claims, that define these two, they tied these external claims, RV and mansion to their gambling claims. Singer did it when he told Shackleford he used the money from his gambling (stolen double up bug) claim to purchase the RV.
Mdawgs was a little less direct. He said because he spent so much time in Las Vegas winning, that he was purchasing a home (mansion) instead of living at the casinos
Now the reason Mdawg almost immediately pulled the plug on this mansion claims (after he claimed to have purchased it and was renovating it) was because someone pointed out to him that such a real estate transaction just would not be too hard to find. Like I said, Vegas isn't L.A with a million transactions at this level. So Mdawgs first response was that no one would be able to find this because it was purchased in a family trust. I think he quickly realized that wouldn't change anything one bit. Still would be easy to find if such a purchase was made or easy to see that no real purchase matched, which is what he was really afraid of.
At that point he took a different tact, scrubbed the post where he stated he purchased the property and ignored any questions about it. At WoV, where he has influence, he had me suspended for asking about it.
And that is what happened to the magical mystery mansion. At one point, I thought we might get pictures of A mansion, inside and out, that didn't belong to him, ala Rob Singer's RV, but again, I will give credit...Mdawg is too smart for that. he is not stupid. He is just a guy who wants to tell a story about winning and try to impress people. Unfortunately for him, that just doesn't work on a forum where there are real players who KNOW how things work.
Dodge ball champion thongj … strutting pool side with a pink gun holster and blue lace panties with his dicklet locked away in chastity trolling for black security guardsQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI was hoping Mdawg would deny that he ever posted about the Mansion. But he is too smart for that. While he has scrubbed the post away so no one can see it now, he can't be sure who saw it and might have a screenshot just waiting for him to hang himself. So he doesn't deny. He just ignores. I know for a fact redietz saw the post because he commented on things at that forum. I am sure there are others beside myself and Half Smoke, that just no longer wish to waste time, much the same that Half Smoke has decided.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Now here is why that mention of the mansion matters at all. And how it came to be what it is today. It matter just like Singer's RV shit mattered, because while separate from the ridiculous gambling claims, that define these two, they tied these external claims, RV and mansion to their gambling claims. Singer did it when he told Shackleford he used the money from his gambling (stolen double up bug) claim to purchase the RV.
Mdawgs was a little less direct. He said because he spent so much time in Las Vegas winning, that he was purchasing a home (mansion) instead of living at the casinos
Now the reason Mdawg almost immediately pulled the plug on this mansion claims (after he claimed to have purchased it and was renovating it) was because someone pointed out to him that such a real estate transaction just would not be too hard to find. Like I said, Vegas isn't L.A with a million transactions at this level. So Mdawgs first response was that no one would be able to find this because it was purchased in a family trust. I think he quickly realized that wouldn't change anything one bit. Still would be easy to find if such a purchase was made or easy to see that no real purchase matched, which is what he was really afraid of.
At that point he took a different tact, scrubbed the post where he stated he purchased the property and ignored any questions about it. At WoV, where he has influence, he had me suspended for asking about it.
And that is what happened to the magical mystery mansion. At one point, I thought we might get pictures of A mansion, inside and out, that didn't belong to him, ala Rob Singer's RV, but again, I will give credit...Mdawg is too smart for that. he is not stupid. He is just a guy who wants to tell a story about winning and try to impress people. Unfortunately for him, that just doesn't work on a forum where there are real players who KNOW how things work.
I'm not reading all that b******* I just skimmed but it's good to know that I have made you put so much time and effort into doing so.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgCompletely untrue. Another example of AxelWolf alcohol hazed poor recollection nonsense.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
After Wolf kept shooting his mouth off about that my stock trades were fabricated or that the WIN statements I posted were not genuine, I proposed at least two wagers to the Wolf, and he declined both of them.
On the one wager,
250K Wager
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-...rs/#post796763
he started singing the tune of that "the stock trades must be genuine but someone else must be posting them."
and on the other 500K wager, that involves the genuineness of my Vegas WIN statements,
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-.../3/#post797552
he started pretending as if he didn't read it and that anyway, he doesn't have 500K to wager.
The one wager where he claims that I backed down,
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gamb...lf/#post787357
was where I offered to pay anyone $5000. who could create an Adventures thread like mine
which would include:
-stacks of cash
-stacks of chips
-millions of dollars in paid off markers
-casino checks issued for wins
-pictures and videos of high end timepieces
-pictures of winning Baccarat shoes
-pictures of large Vegas high roller suites
-pictures of gourmets meal eaten at casino resort restaurants
-pictures of the television screen inside the suites, and paper folios, that prove full RFB comps.
-actual video of WIN statements while logged in live to player card accounts to substantiate all alleged wins
where everything was FAKED.
As always, mostly due to his poor reading skills but also due to that he is a “greedy scrambler” as Monet calls him, AxelWolf came back with some version of what he THOUGHT was proposed and then started crying when I said No, that’s not what I proposed and I said that I wouldn’t pay him anything for doing something entirely different from the challenge I wrote up in the first place. The issue was that Axel proposed creating a thread centered around some trips he had at low end casinos outside of Vegas, and said that this would satisfy the wager. I said No, the wager is that you claim that you could create something where everything was entirely faked, where there were NO casino stays, NO genuine chips, NO real cash, NO casino play, NO comp’ing, all fabricated fake, not some genuine adventures but at a low end casino!
I mean we’re talking about an idiot who didn’t realize that a marker with the signature torn out of it must have been paid –
https://i.imgur.com/FyFnGFl.png
actually had no idea what a marker is or how they work, obviously, and had the audacity to claim that he could come up with an Adventures thread that mimicked mine but was entirely fake.
Wolf has a habit of trying to alter Challenges to suit what he thinks was said. For example more recently I made this Challenge proposal
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gamb...72/#post895875
How about if you go deposit $9000. cash at the cage at Wynn, go play a few hands of whatever, such that your win or loss is in the hundreds of dollars only, and then go back to the cage and get one check for the entire withdrawal - the $9000. plus or minus the few hundred.
and of course Wolf came back with some nonsense “moving the goalposts” as SooPoo put it, about getting a check at a casino for something or other that had nothing to do with my challenge or verified winnings.
Wolf does this sort of thing frequently, mostly because he is a poor reader and suffers from ADD intensified by alcoholism, but also because he’s greedily anxious to create some sort of wager where he is assured a win, even if it has nothing to do with what was proposed originally by the challenger.
As far as BACKING OUT from an offer, the only person who has done this verifiably is the Wolf himself, when he offered unilaterally sight unseen to buy Wizard’s watch, and then reneged, saying he would perform “only if it’s a good deal.”
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gamb...35/#post785630
https://i.imgur.com/jtJyKZch.jpg
Even before he took a powder on that, I predicted it
https://i.imgur.com/LzIRkINh.jpg
and I was right!
Bottom line, between the two of us, it is the Wolf who has verifiably written checks with his mouth that he couldn't cash.
So here's the deal, let's prove that you'll actually be willing to put up money on something. No bet, no challenge, no strings attached. I'll put up 25k on deposit with Mike for one week, and you do the same. We both get it back after one week. As I said, no challenge, no bet, nothing, just put up the f****** money and prove you have it to put up.
Again, the epitome of a narcissist (especially the watch :rolleyes:). No better example! You know who called that out 4 years ago? One Rob Singer.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
We need to have some mdawg written on paper action as part of the picture so we can get it established that the chips and such are actually his or at least someone gives him enough access to put his name on a piece of paper. (lol)
This might be another surfboard moment.
Might not.
This dawg fellow seems to think we're easily impressed by pics of chips, watches and currency.
I'm not.
It is believed by some here that the dawg gets his money from a source other than by succeeding at casino gambling; given that, of what probative value are these silly pics?
What, are his family successful camel herders and slavers and does he get to live on the spoils?
If not slavery, then maybe guns? Oil? Smuggling?
Whatever, the fact he is given money means nothing.
A man's character is based on what he actually does, not what he says he's done, and with this putz all we get is empty brags: like him buying a seven figure home recently in LV, bwa ha ha ha.
Memo to the dawg: you keep ignoring your clients, pissing away the family fortune in LV and posting online 24/7 and you'll have one hell of a malpractice claim.
I don't think that MDawg has what it takes, in the end, to "pull the trigger". Ha. So, even a thousand "wonderful" deaths is still a thousand deaths.
Exactly!! So what the fuck have you done bitch ? Zero motherfucker that’s whatQuote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Fucking disbarred lawyer who gets high all fucking day like the rest of societies trash . Zero value for the world it’s probably why all you fags are so jealous over Mdawg. Weirdos
Disbarred?Quote:
Originally Posted by Seedvalue
Moi?
Bwa ha ha ha
Zero value?
Bwa ha ha ha
I retired after 40 years of practicing law; I am now living the life of Reilly.
My son, his wife and their son live nearby and we get along well, that is most important to me.
But since clowns like you are impressed by flashy things, note that I have acquired parcels of real estate, IRA's and of course lots of moolah from practicing law and investing over the years, meanwhile, you post lies to strangers about the size of your johnson.
Who's the loser here, boyo?
Hint: not me.
I'm not reading all that b******* I just skimmed but it's good to know that I have made you put so much time and effort into doing so.
So here's the deal, let's prove that you'll actually be willing to put up money on something. No bet, no challenge, no strings attached. I'll put up 25k on deposit with Mike for one week, and you do the same. We both get it back after one week. As I said, no challenge, no bet, nothing, just put up the f****** money and prove you have it to put up.
*Is that CRICKETS I hear???
The pictures are meaningless, you haven't a clue if that's prop money, and you haven't a clue if the watches are real or fake. You haven't a clue if the chips are real.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVDisbarred?Quote:
Originally Posted by Seedvalue
Moi?
Bwa ha ha ha
Zero value?
Bwa ha ha ha
I retired after 40 years of practicing law; I am now living the life of Reilly.
My son, his wife and their son live nearby and we get along well, that is most important to me.
But since clowns like you are impressed by flashy things, note that I have acquired parcels of real estate, IRA's and of course lots of moolah from practicing law and investing over the years, meanwhile, you post lies to strangers about the size of your johnson.
Who's the loser here, boyo?
Hint: not me.
Even IF it was all real you haven't any clue under what circumstances those pictures were taken. Mdawg might be a LapDawg for his super-rich, much better-looking, more fit, more successful cousin. Come on man, we see it time and time again, people pretending to be something they are not while using other people's lives as their own.
Obviously nothing will come of this, but I’m willing to put up the same $100,000 I put up against Singer having a 9 1/2 cock against the claim Mr V was never disbarred.Quote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueExactly!! So what the fuck have you done bitch ? Zero motherfucker that’s whatQuote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Fucking disbarred lawyer who gets high all fucking day like the rest of societies trash . Zero value for the world it’s probably why all you fags are so jealous over Mdawg. Weirdos
This is as good a coin flip as they come on these forums so let’s come up with the terms. V as been around for years on forums so we have multiple admins I actually trust that can determine where the guy posting as Mr V comes from. And we can determine if he was actually a lawyer. And then if he was disbarred.
Seed, I believe you are actually what you claim to be but if you want to put money out there on this one, I’m glad to accept the wager. After all, it’s just $100k to you.
We both know we are both are good for it so let’s figure out the details.