The WoV Thread

It is possible to b eat baccarats to the tune of about 1.2+ units nets profits per shoe, long terms. On top of that you can also take advantage of losses rebates, non-negotiable rolling chips program, show up money and other inducement. Also, most joint think that baccarats can't be beat so minimal scrutinies and little chance of the backs-off, hey hey.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soxfan

It is possible to b eat baccarats to the tune of about 1.2+ units nets profits per shoe, long terms. On top of that you can also take advantage of losses rebates, non-negotiable rolling chips program, show up money and other inducement. Also, most joint think that baccarats can't be beat so minimal scrutinies and little chance of the backs-off, hey hey.

---

Soxfan, Have you read Mdawgs accounts and claims? he has posted reports from about 1000 days of play over the past 5 years. 200 days a year. and 90% (maybe more) are winning sessions. Totaling winnings in the millions.

So loss rebate doesn't enter into the equation. He rarely posts of any losses and that is where the advantage from loss rebate kicks in...on losses. plus he never mentioned loss rebates until Axelwolf brought it up.

Winning 90+% of sessions sounds like a progression wagering system. Which is pretty much what he alluded to early on, saying stupid shit like a big bankroll could guarantee winnings. Now we all know how progression wagering works. 90% winning sessions would be very possible. BUT, every once in a while there is that huge loss that wipes away all those winnings plus some.

So Mdawg is either not telling us about that huge loss every once in a while, or lying about all the winning. It is one or the other.

AND casinos do not comp high end suites for 1000 nights over 5 years to a player that is winning millions over that time as Mdawg claims. But a casino does give handsome comps to a losing player. One way or another he is not telling us about the losses. :rolleyes:

And I suspect he is counting all the marked up, over priced comps as money. A $2000 a night suite does not count as winning cash of $2000. A lot of ploppy, -Ev players do this to justify to themselves or wives. That is just nonsense.

So you read at least some of Mdawgs 5 year claims on multiple sites and then get back to me. Fair?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RobSinger

How many times does he need to suffer thru "It just isn't fair that MDawg gets to claim he wins all the time with comps, gifts and special treatment, and he gets support & cover from Benedict Shack and other Richard Potatoes from the gaming forums' group of administrators!" "Can't you people see how much this HURTS me when I can't do anything about it?"

Yes....kew IS the architect of his own suffering. While other disbelievers aren't affected one bit by what MDawg does or says, kew let's it get so far under his skin that it's beginning to spell I AM A FOOL all over his wimpy body

How about some truth about his obsession for a refreshing change. Kew is so extraordinarily jealous of the guy because he knows he has wealth far beyond anything kew will ever see. He also despises him for being normal and not being afflicted with that short circuit in his brain. Covering up this ball of envy with rambling posts of "I'm an educator on LV gambling operation, and I say THAT'S NOT HOW THIS CITY WORKS!"

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

V IS an addict/alcoholic.

---

LOL

Still raising that flag to see if anyone salutes, eh?

Party on, Garth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cxq53_ZkmZc

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Do I think I'm an addict?

Not really, but I have a strong weed habit.

---

Come on mang, you've been ingesting one mind altering substance or another almost every day of your life since you were 15, if you're not an addict who is?

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhKMVlHz9FQ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

And no I didn't play VP at Longhorn. maybe once to see what kind of mailers, but if I recall the mailer was shit and I never played VP there again. Again, AP stuff, at the most basic level that you can't possibly comprehend, because you are just a ploppy type gambler. Higher limit, but just a gambler.

---

LOL

And that is what irks the dawg so...not only have you had him pegged as a bullshitter from the get go, he now realizes that he's a ploppy whereas you are an AP.

His ego won't stand for it, so he flames you, hoping that doing so will make him feel better...nope...epic fail.

Keep up tugging the dawg's tail, it's a hoot to watch him bark in response.

---

V, why in the world would mdawg care about him being labeled an AP or not being labeled as such? Sure kew cares about that type of labeling, but that's because it's all part of his fabricated online life. Bottom line in this saga is who has the money and who doesn't. We certainly know that answer. And if kew doesn't want it to be that someone is Ritchie Rich and brags about it--or if someone has had him and his concoctions pegged from the get-go and announces millions in winnings like myself--kew will do what he does best: lie and lie and lie until he's twisted the truth around in his already sick & warped mind.

The reason kew is so obsessed with mdawg's stated winning is plain as day: he abhors the fact that the forum communities all agree the guy is a wealthy individual. And whenever kew whines about it and says "he's using inherited money" that's nothing more than verification of his jealousy over mdawg.

I love how mdawg continually pours salt into kew's wounds by telling detailed stories about how he goes about his winning. It puts kew on tilt, because all the bj books he reads and all the posts he reads tell him it's possible but not probable. Of course, kew bypassed those facts since they make him and his gizzard uneasy, and instead claims it's impossible. And this---from a phony who rarely ever plays and when he does, it's at the low levels he's been seen playing at by other members.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

The bottom line is that UNKewlyingJ has nothing to offer other than "Look at me, I am telling the truth." But after countless times now having been proven to have lied, after having even admitted when cornered about some of his lies, he needs to offer more if he wants to be believed. And if he doesn't care whether he is believed or not, why does he cry so much about the fact that no one believes him any longer?

This guy created some kind of online persona, and tried to have to make sense. It made sense only because he took the time to research what he was claiming and tried to correlate his stories with what he had heard or read. Now, all of it is in question.

---

Axelwolf is right. I do have Autism, which is why I behave the off way I do. And why I took my banning from WOV so seriously when MANY people would have been like,"Oh well, WOV is just another Website, who cares if I'm banned. "

Well I know of autistics who function quite well actually.

Now it's time for UNKewlJ to step up too, and admit what everyone already knows about him - that he's not only a fraud but mentally ill.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tasha

Axelwolf is right. I do have Autism, which is why I behave the off way I do. And why I took my banning from WOV so seriously when MANY people would have been like,"Oh well, WOV is just another Website, who cares if I'm banned. "

---

You seem to function pretty well overall.

You don’t seem much more off than many of the other folks around here.

I recall arguing, with one of the regulars at English Stackexchange, about having autism, or, not having it. He argued that there's a bit of it in all of us, which is the societal view to drum up funding for it. However, from my brief research on line, it does seem that one can't be a bit autistic. Anyway, no point in arguing with a regular of a large forum. They just keep talking until the other regulars shut you down.

https://i.imgur.com/bFvGaBo.jpg



A sign saying, Please date me.

"Body shaming" now, are ya, dawg?

Wow, a new low...even for you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

"Body shaming" now, are ya, dawg?

Wow, a new low...even for you.

---

But what isn't new is the reason. At one time Poker Grinder publicly expressed doubt about Mdawg and his gambling claims. And that immediately put him on the same list as several dozen others that Mdawg attacks in anyway he can think of.

Wealthy, or not wealthy, or wealthy to some degree (less than he wants people to think), it looks very similar to another insecure old "orange" dude I saw on the TV last night. :D

I would say this is an illness of the wealthy, but then there is Rob Singer. :D

But it is most definitely an illness of insecure people.

V, you just need to accept that you have no idea what's going on. Anywhere.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

V, you just need to accept that you have no idea what's going on. Anywhere.

---

What is that comment supposed to mean?

You keep trying to "figure out" what is happening or happened behind the scenes (here, there, everywhere), and then interpreting forum rules to boot.

No one knows! No one knows!

And as a lawyer you should know that it's not always about who is right but who makes the best argument.