Printable View
If you were trying to prove something to Rob Singer or to the forum you should have sent your package to Rob Singer or posted it on the forum.
Tony told me the package contains lots of results and ads mentioning Robert Dietz. What is that supposed to prove?
For the record I have no reason to doubt who you are but there was no proof of identity in your package i.e., copy of driver license or passport.
Doesn't this mean you are back to square one?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
I offered to both mail or actually meet you and Argentino and hand deliver the information. I even invited you to drop in anytime at GaryT's address, which you have. For an investigative reporter, you don't do much investigating.
I don't know about square one, as I have met other forum members in person. I was the beneficiary of those meetings, as they know a lot more about video poker than I do. So it seems as if you and Argentino are basically the ones in the dark.
Hey, I'm a Uke. What are you trying to say?
Sorry redietz I haven't been an investigative reporter since October of 2006 when I left KCAL and went into the advertising business. The burden of proof is on you.
1. Yes you sent me a collection of ads, articles and clippings about Robert Dietz.
2. There is no proof that you are that Robert Dietz.
3. You mailed it and used the return address of your friend in Orange County -- not even your own return address.
4. You have declined to post anything yourself on this forum.
5. I don't recall you even giving the name or contact info for your betting service.
6. Today you revealed you don't take bets from the public.
7. You have consistently denied doing any advertising which could be used to prove who you are.
Now WTF is your point?
So an individual receives texts which they are upset about, numerous times, but does not record the organization or telephone number, at least by pencil on a pad? Yet, they know who sent the texts but changes the subject when disclosure of knowledge generally follows.Quote:
Originally Posted by Deech
Yes, redietz must prove himself with every post, but I must be slow, as I still haven't figured out the organization redietz is with?
Deech, redietz says he didn't send the texts. And Rob can't identify the texts as specifically coming from redietz. I would say that makes the text issue moot.
Now we return to an issue that's been around for a year or longer and well before you joined us: redietz feels as though he must prove who he is.
I've said it over and over: he doesn't have to prove anything to me.
But if he wants to prove who he is let him prove it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
You really should attempt to listen to people who know more about something than you do. Or take notes for yourself; your memory is failing. I love enumerating points, so let's get to it.
1) I think that meeting me would have proven I'm Robert Dietz.
2) I lived at that address for six months a year the last three years. You had an open invitation to drop in. Not my fault you didn't.
3) My photo is on this forum.
4) I posted the old wayback machine archived web address of the service multiple times on this forum, so you got that dead wrong. Check the old www.IntegritySports.com on the wayback machine. I get tired of apologizing for how retro-corny it looks, but what the hey. And LarryS hates the fact I used the word "investment," so he read the damned thing.
5) If I took bets from the public, that would make me a bookmaker. Ahem, that is illegal.
6) In a previous post above, you said I sent you some ads, which I did. Do you even read (or remember) what you post?
Now, as to the "WTF" are my points?
My points are that you demonstrate over and over that (1) you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, (2) something is wrong with your memory if you mention I sent ads in one post and 10 minutes later claim I denied doing any advertising. I was in a televised contest way back when on some Buffalo cable station. I was in GamePlan magazine with a full page ad. I was in the nationally distributed House of Sports newsletter every week for roughly a decade, and (3) when was the last time you questioned Argentino the way you just questioned me?
Drops the mike.
But there is no proof it's you!
Look I don't doubt who you say you are. But you are obsessed with proving it to Rob Singer. So go ahead and prove it to him. I've confirmed you sent me a package with fifty-plus pages mentioning Robert Dietz. If I am called as a witness I can testify to that. I can't testify about anything else.
Do you really need to prove who you are to Rob? Then prove it.
I'm out because you sent me nothing to prove who you are.
Alan, hopefully you know by my few posts that I do not have an axe to grind about any individual.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
You just stated that Rob can't identify the texts as specifically coming from redietz. Then how does he establish the claim? Yes, there was a phone call to someone who probably cannot answer any questions. There was no clear answer as to what the respondent on the phone stated. Yet the "yuppie" making $10 an hour admitted to anything to make a sale.
Sorry, I am old school. If I received these texts, and was annoyed, I would be ready for rebuttal before I accused someone. I would at least save the organizational name and the telephone number. Have the facts ready to end the argument. Personally, I love arguments, about facts, and would have the sledgehammer ready to win the discussion. There is nothing better to win an argument without a rebuttal. To me, on this forum, everyone would go for the jugular if they had the ammunition.
I said the text issue is moot, Deech. Let me make it more clear: drop the text issue. There is no proof about them.
On the other hand had there actually been texts Rob might have been able to see that redietz is who he says he is.
Alan, your butt buddy Robert Harry Argentino is a proven liar over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. His claim about redietz is 100% false. Get your head out of your ass.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
I have to comment about this point made by redietz above:
"2) I lived at that address for six months a year the last three years. You had an open invitation to drop in. Not my fault you didn't."
Are you kidding? I don't know you from Adam and so I wouldn't "drop in."
Now for the 100th time: why won't you post your proof here and be done with it? Or, just drop it because I think only you and Rob Singer care and no one (including me) cares what Rob Singer says about this.
Hey I know you get the news late in Montana so I'll say it again: I don't give a fuck what Rob says about the texts or his complaints about redietz proving himself. This is a battle between redietz and Singer and frankly redietz could end it. Or a better question: why did redietz fall for it?Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmAlan, your butt buddy Robert Harry Argentino is a proven liar over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. His claim about redietz is 100% false. Get your head out of your ass.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan MendelsonHey I know you get the news late in Montana so I'll say it again: I don't give a fuck what Rob says about the texts or his complaints about redietz proving himself. This is a battle between redietz and Singer and frankly redietz could end it. Or a better question: why did redietz fall for it?Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmAlan, your butt buddy Robert Harry Argentino is a proven liar over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. His claim about redietz is 100% false. Get your head out of your ass.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
You know, it does seem strange to me that Mr. Mendelson, who stands to gain 2K as a donation if Argentino provides the text messages and numbers, hasn't mentioned anything about my generous offer. Mr. Mendelson evidently doesn't expect to be getting 2K anytime soon. I thought he might have a higher opinion of Argentino than that. Perhaps not, eh?
Alan, what about the 2K? Don't you care. I already told you what Argentino would do if pressed for the name of the tout service:Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan MendelsonHey I know you get the news late in Montana so I'll say it again: I don't give a fuck what Rob says about the texts or his complaints about redietz proving himself. This is a battle between redietz and Singer and frankly redietz could end it. Or a better question: why did redietz fall for it?Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmAlan, your butt buddy Robert Harry Argentino is a proven liar over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. His claim about redietz is 100% false. Get your head out of your ass.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...R1bGgeMYmqcKGR
Why do I feel like Peter Faulk in an episode of "Columbo":Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
The text issue is moot. Drop it. There is no proof about them.
"But isn't texting the reason for your claim?". "What other evidence do you have without texting?".
None.
But wait. There are other texts.
"Do they insinuate a sports betting solicitation?"
No. Just a text. But it was from him.
No other comments. I will take in the scenery in my 1959 Peugeot.
Did I ever say anything about the thousand or the two thousand, mickeycrimm? What I did say is that redietz appears desperate to prove that Rob has no text messages.
Rob told me from the get-go he has no text messages. There was never any proof they existed. Why would anyone care besides Rob Singer and Robert Dietz? I don't care.
If these two want to do battle let them. Frankly I resent that redietz tried to get me involved by posting he would give me money if Singer had the texts. Why did redietz do that? Why didn't he offer Singer the money?
I suspect redietz mentioned me and tried to suck me in because of his damned package that I didn't run to see. But guess what? I didn't have to see it because today redietz wrote here that he didn't care about my opinion was of the package.
It's been one big egotistical cluster fuck.
Drop it Deech. Now you're trolling.Quote:
Originally Posted by DeechWhy do I feel like Peter Faulk in an episode of "Columbo":Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
The text issue is moot. Drop it. There is no proof about them.
"But isn't texting the reason for your claim?". "What other evidence do you have without texting?".
None.
But wait. There are other texts.
"Do they insinuate a sports betting solicitation?"
No. Just a text. But it was from him.
No other comments. I will take in the scenery in my 1959 Peugeot.
Alan, you are correct by definition. I apologize if I upset anyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan MendelsonDrop it Deech. Now you're trolling.Quote:
Originally Posted by DeechWhy do I feel like Peter Faulk in an episode of "Columbo":Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
The text issue is moot. Drop it. There is no proof about them.
"But isn't texting the reason for your claim?". "What other evidence do you have without texting?".
None.
But wait. There are other texts.
"Do they insinuate a sports betting solicitation?"
No. Just a text. But it was from him.
No other comments. I will take in the scenery in my 1959 Peugeot.
My question has never been answered.
Perhaps you should have kept your fat mouth shut from the beginning instead of volunteering to receive whatever he sent you....get it dummy?Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan MendelsonHey I know you get the news late in Montana so I'll say it again: I don't give a fuck what Rob says about the texts or his complaints about redietz proving himself. This is a battle between redietz and Singer and frankly redietz could end it. Or a better question: why did redietz fall for it?Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmAlan, your butt buddy Robert Harry Argentino is a proven liar over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. His claim about redietz is 100% false. Get your head out of your ass.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson