kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

It is amusing I'll admit to recognize that the dawg now clearly sees that no one believes him, but he keeps spewing bullshit out of his keyboard. But what's the most amusing is that he pretends that any of what he says makes a difference, while actually with each lie he's invented, the more he tries to defend it, the more obvious it becomes that he's lying. That he keeps attacking his nay-sayers and keeps posting the same ridiculous bullshit over and over cements the belief that this clown is certifiable.

FYP

---

Do you have proof that he's lying about anything?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Mission, I don't distinguish between the scammer guys like on youtube that are selling their phony baloney systems or selling membership into some secret blackjack army, where they will teach you to win at blackjack or bacarát or roulette or any other damn thing and the people on forums just repeatedly spewing voodoo bullshit. It is an attempt to mislead people with bullshit whether it is monetized or not. Rob Singer wrote 2 books, trying to monetize his bullshit. He just wasn't successful.

Mdawg, well if he is anywhere near as wealthy as he claims, which I have doubts about, then it isn't about monetizing anything with him. I think it is simply a narcisstic trying to impress people with him. BUT still, people can be mislead and financially hurt, just the same as if they were scammed into buying some bullshit system. When Mdawg writes that he played a $100-$5000 spread playing double deck at a strip casino winning 60k over 10 straight hours, how many people went out and tried that? Maybe none. But maybe a few.

And some people will say that is on them for being so stupid...and there is some truth to that. But I just think on a forum like WoV, that is supposed to be about helping players become better gamblers (mike's mission statement when he started the forum), That such bullshit should be called out by both Mike and other members.

And that is all this ever was on my part. It is just that Mdawg like singer before him responds with all kind of vicious lies and attacks towards anyone who dares say. You can't win with by "betting into hot streaks" or with "special plays", or because you have a big bankroll like that somehow magically overcomes -EV. Voodoo should be called out as voodoo. thats all.

---

This conversation has already been had; you know where I'm at on it.

Funny watching kew cry like a baby over what he says are lies told about him, when all he's ever done with those who've surprised him by having him pegged very early on, is spew lie after lie after lie about them!

Of course in kew's little world of concoctions, it's completely OK for him to lie, because he just HAS to be believed. He spends the vast majority of his meaningless life putting up loooooong drawn-out monotonous posts, over and over again, fighting and arguing with EVERYBODY simply because he can't hack the fact of what I've said about him being a big fat liar and embellishing fraud from the get-go. He's gone to hell and back trying to convince the masses otherwise. All he's accomplished however, is proving hell is his true home.

He is the Joke.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

(Druff) is a guy that runs a forum I am on, and has allowed all kinds of dishonest shit to be spewed.

---

Well... yeah... and that's been a good thing for you, don't you think? :rolleyes:

Otherwise you're inferring that you can make whatever unsubstantiated claims you like, but others cannot and should be subject to admin moderation. It's not that members of this forum decided they don't like you, but more that hypocrisy tends to rub people the wrong way. You want rules enforced as long as they don't apply to you.

I have nothing against you KJ. You even come off as a good dude much of the time, but Singer is right... you're creating your own hell here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jdog

Otherwise you're inferring that you can make whatever unsubstantiated claims you like, but others cannot and should be subject to admin moderation. It's not that members of this forum decided they don't like you, but more that hypocrisy tends to rub people the wrong way. You want rules enforced as long as they don't apply to you.

I have nothing against you KJ. You even come off as a good dude much of the time, but Singer is right... you're creating your own hell here.

---

The one that really got me is that Doxxing is totally cool as long as it is not an AP you are Doxxing. LMAO!!!

It's like, "WHAT!?" Would KewlJ create a new tax for people, but exempt only those who are his exact height?

I'm just giving you shit, KewlJ, but that was a funny one.

If someone goes on a message board for something medical, such as:

https://forums.studentdoctor.net/cat...ties-md-do.35/

But, they give information that is inaccurate or, for whatever reason, tell a tall tale...would doctors think that you just Doxx those people now?

Speaking of which, I'd also be shocked if there are any doctors on there bragging about being the best surgeon currently alive.

But, let's be honest; we're mostly kind of fucking nuts. Normal people don't do the sorts of things we do or think the sorts of things we think. Could you imagine a message board for mechanics where one of them talks about how he's the best mechanic to ever live and brags constantly about his shop's hourly labor charge whilst calling all of the other mechanics losers? Hahaha!

It would be shocking to see one mechanic do any such...much less 10-20% of them.

Since this thread is about Kewl I wanted to make a statement and probably just leave him alone for now. I sometimes feel a bit overly mean dissecting his nonsense when it has such obvious importance in his life. There is some line where is becomes bullying and I'm definitely in that area.

However 2 things.

I reached out to him in private. If he would admit that shuffler story was BS (I may have even worded that he could just fess up to part of it being a lie), then I would not tell anyone AND I would stop being mean to him. That is when he told me "it is all true and fuck you!". So ok. That is a reasonable response if his lies were true but clearly they are not. I was just giving him a sincere chance to act like a reasonable human and he decided to not and tell me to fuck off. So when he came back after his promised disappearance that is when I broke down why the full shuffler story is as bad or worse than the backrooming. I had given him a sincere chance. There was no trolling or anything like that.

The other thing is his incessant proving Singer and Mdawg aren't what they claim. He has been relentless on a search for "the truth". Just because Kewl's lies are crafted to be sustainable and Singer/Mdawgs are meant to be fantastic and entertaining doesn't change anything. In fact, I would argue that what Kewl has been doing is more harmful. He is enticing people to get into that life when it is very very questionable whether he does what he says he does. People out there wanted to believe Kewl's fable and he has so desperately craved this attention and respect. Even when the guy is pressed into a corner he falls back on the "but but my life is possible due to the math". No one going to LV to beat UX from hearing Singer. Same with Mdawg. Kewl though tries his best to be believable and persuasive and thus has the largest chance of actually convincing people.

Which is a better posterchild for getting guys to drop it and move to LV to count cards? ZK or Kewl? lol.

Just another thought from the Twilight Zone, but, I wonder that it's really MDawg. He wrote of minions to do his bidding in school days, so, perhaps, he hired someone to write the MDawg parts here and there, and, hence the references to himself mostly by the third person tense. Explains some other things, such as what Boz brought up, about a rich guy spending so much time on gambling forums.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Since this thread is about Kewl I wanted to make a statement and probably just leave him alone for now. I sometimes feel a bit overly mean dissecting his nonsense when it has such obvious importance in his life. There is some line where is becomes bullying and I'm definitely in that area.

However 2 things.

I reached out to him in private. If he would admit that shuffler story was BS (I may have even worded that he could just fess up to part of it being a lie), then I would not tell anyone AND I would stop being mean to him. That is when he told me "it is all true and fuck you!". So ok. That is a reasonable response if his lies were true but clearly they are not. I was just giving him a sincere chance to act like a reasonable human and he decided to not and tell me to fuck off. So when he came back after his promised disappearance that is when I broke down why the full shuffler story is as bad or worse than the backrooming. I had given him a sincere chance. There was no trolling or anything like that.

The other thing is his incessant proving Singer and Mdawg aren't what they claim. He has been relentless on a search for "the truth". Just because Kewl's lies are crafted to be sustainable and Singer/Mdawgs are meant to be fantastic and entertaining doesn't change anything. In fact, I would argue that what Kewl has been doing is more harmful. He is enticing people to get into that life when it is very very questionable whether he does what he says he does. People out there wanted to believe Kewl's fable and he has so desperately craved this attention and respect. Even when the guy is pressed into a corner he falls back on the "but but my life is possible due to the math". No one going to LV to beat UX from hearing Singer. Same with Mdawg. Kewl though tries his best to be believable and persuasive and thus has the largest chance of actually convincing people.

Which is a better posterchild for getting guys to drop it and move to LV to count cards? ZK or Kewl? lol.

---

Basically you are saying that MDawgs stories are insignificant to everyone because they have zero value regardless if they are true or fake, because they affect no one other than the dumb fucks who believe in nonsense -EV and are inspired by all the winning BSstories? His biggest fan (probably himself) was a big fat proven fraud.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I would argue that what Kewl has been doing is more harmful.

---

I think this could be true but I think he is harming himself more than anyone and does not see that. If you want to stop abusing him, then just stop. Clearly it's not getting anywhere because he doesn't trust anyone and he's not going to own up to anything. Coming clean has proven to be disastrous to him so far. It only fuels his tormentors further.

It's a cruel world, or so I've heard.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mission146

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jdog

Otherwise you're inferring that you can make whatever unsubstantiated claims you like, but others cannot and should be subject to admin moderation. It's not that members of this forum decided they don't like you, but more that hypocrisy tends to rub people the wrong way. You want rules enforced as long as they don't apply to you.

I have nothing against you KJ. You even come off as a good dude much of the time, but Singer is right... you're creating your own hell here.

---

The one that really got me is that Doxxing is totally cool as long as it is not an AP you are Doxxing. LMAO!!!

It's like, "WHAT!?" Would KewlJ create a new tax for people, but exempt only those who are his exact height?

I'm just giving you shit, KewlJ, but that was a funny one.

---

Mission, have you visited and read Dan Druff Poker fraud forum at all? The top thread is a thread now some 750 pages long about youtube scammer Christopher Mitchel. Dan Druff and his membership, lead by Druff himself and his investigations have revealed all kind of things about this Christopher Mitchel person, including addresses, past employment, cars he drives among other things. This is all doxing! Any personal information you reveal about a person that they did not reveal is doxing.

Druff and his co-horts seem to think this is OK because Mitchel is on youtube soliciting money as part of his scam. Well I don't distinguish the soliciting part as much as others do. Scamming and misleading people with false bullshit that will have them lose their money is scamming...period. The solicitation just takes it to a higher level.

Mdawg is scamming people with mis-information that anyone trying what he claims will be hurt financially, and backed off and barred for attempting a 1-50 spread and I could list 100 things.

So if it is OK to dox Mitchel and reveal anything you find that contradicts his bullshit claims, and I believe it is, and Druff himself justifies that, I see no difference in doing so with Mdawg. The information that comes to light will prove he is not who he claims and not winning as he claims. It will prove the Mdawg adventure, nothing more than a scam, not all that different than Christopher mitchel, except Mitchel takes it a step further with the solicitaion of money.

Again, the pertinent question is why does someone like Mdawg not use his real name if he has nothing to hide. He isn't hiding from the casinos like most APs are. He plays rated, making sure they know who he is, to get every ounce of comps due him. So the only people he is hiding from are the members of these different forums who would find out who he really is and what his story really is.

Now there are a lot of people on this forum of late that no longer believe me or anything I say or any part of my claims. Or at least that is what they say, i don't really believe that. So they essentially think I am the same kind of scammer I am accusing Mdawg of being. Ok fine, If anybody can prove that, prove that I am Tom Reilly, living in Albuquerque, working as a night watchman and not who I claim, then they are free to do that. If they can prove that I am Sally Hutton, living in Vegas, but working at the dollar store and not who/what I claim, they should and are free to do that. If they can prove any of the ridiculous claims, male prostitution, to about 100 other things, that would prove my claims false and me a scammer, they should do that. That would be doxxing, but I think that would be fair game because I would have been misleading or scamming people.

But the fact is nobody can or has proven a damn thing like that. All they do is make up silly, silly shit, with no proof, just attempting to discredit or smear me.

In short, I believe doxxing a person misleading, or scamming, myself included is justifiable if it proves they are not who they claim in misleading people. Whether that be a Christopher Mitchel who takes it to the next level with the solicitation, or an Mdawg, who is such an expert manipulator with his picture and shit, or me, if I am not who I say and claim.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Since this thread is about Kewl I wanted to make a statement and probably just leave him alone for now. I sometimes feel a bit overly mean dissecting his nonsense when it has such obvious importance in his life. There is some line where is becomes bullying and I'm definitely in that area.

However 2 things.

I reached out to him in private. If he would admit that shuffler story was BS (I may have even worded that he could just fess up to part of it being a lie), then I would not tell anyone AND I would stop being mean to him. That is when he told me "it is all true and fuck you!". So ok. That is a reasonable response if his lies were true but clearly they are not. I was just giving him a sincere chance to act like a reasonable human and he decided to not and tell me to fuck off. So when he came back after his promised disappearance that is when I broke down why the full shuffler story is as bad or worse than the backrooming. I had given him a sincere chance. There was no trolling or anything like that.

The other thing is his incessant proving Singer and Mdawg aren't what they claim. He has been relentless on a search for "the truth". Just because Kewl's lies are crafted to be sustainable and Singer/Mdawgs are meant to be fantastic and entertaining doesn't change anything. In fact, I would argue that what Kewl has been doing is more harmful. He is enticing people to get into that life when it is very very questionable whether he does what he says he does. People out there wanted to believe Kewl's fable and he has so desperately craved this attention and respect. Even when the guy is pressed into a corner he falls back on the "but but my life is possible due to the math". No one going to LV to beat UX from hearing Singer. Same with Mdawg. Kewl though tries his best to be believable and persuasive and thus has the largest chance of actually convincing people.

Which is a better posterchild for getting guys to drop it and move to LV to count cards? ZK or Kewl? lol.

---

Basically you are saying that MDawgs stories are insignificant to everyone because they have zero value regardless if they are true or fake, because they affect no one other than the dumb fucks who believe in nonsense -EV and are inspired by all the winning BSstories? His biggest fan (probably himself) was a big fat proven fraud.

---

Well, yea.. Everything but the second sentence. I still like Mdawg but not really sure what he is about and really don't care.

TBH I like Mdawg because he stirs the shit like Singer and can hold his own. I come across his stuff at times and it is still a head scratcher but I don't care much. I respect his game.

Oh and there is one huge difference between myself and this Mdawg. Everything I claim about what I do with blackjack card counting is backed up by math rather than defying the math. Everything I say in sharing experiences I have encountered is exactly the way Las Vegas works. Everything Mdawg says defies the math and the way Las Vegas works.

You can decide to not believe anyone myself include for any reason you like, but doesn't the really low bar have to be that their claims don't defy the math, and how things actually work?

As for Mitchel I don't know enough about his claims, don't real much of Druffs other forum, only a few minutes here and there and have never even seen a single one of his videos' so I can't speak to whether his claims defy math and the way Vegas or gambling industry in general works. If I had to guess I suspect they do just like Mdawg, Singer and others that I challenge.

The only person I ever challenged, who's claims didn't defy math was the late Kevin Keen, who posted as moses. His claims worked as far as the math. Just not as far as the way things worked when he claimed to be a professional blackjack player playing Reno. Reno is a small sweaty place and just won't allow a player to bet the money or put in the time for that. If he had said he visits Reno as part of his rotation, I would have said fine. I do that, or used to and know other Professional players that will roll into reno for a weekend, but to be based out of and play exclusively Reno as a professional blackjack player, is just not how things work. That is as much BS as spreading $100-$5000 at double deck on the strip for 10 straight hours.

Kewl I'm about done with you but the whole "everything I do is backed by math" doesn't mean much. The way you keep saying it suggests that you crafted this whole thing to abide by "math" as much as anything.

Good luck.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mission146

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jdog

Otherwise you're inferring that you can make whatever unsubstantiated claims you like, but others cannot and should be subject to admin moderation. It's not that members of this forum decided they don't like you, but more that hypocrisy tends to rub people the wrong way. You want rules enforced as long as they don't apply to you.

I have nothing against you KJ. You even come off as a good dude much of the time, but Singer is right... you're creating your own hell here.

---

The one that really got me is that Doxxing is totally cool as long as it is not an AP you are Doxxing. LMAO!!!

It's like, "WHAT!?" Would KewlJ create a new tax for people, but exempt only those who are his exact height?

I'm just giving you shit, KewlJ, but that was a funny one.

---

Mission, have you visited and read Dan Druff Poker fraud forum at all? The top thread is a thread now some 750 pages long about youtube scammer Christopher Mitchel. Dan Druff and his membership, lead by Druff himself and his investigations have revealed all kind of things about this Christopher Mitchel person, including addresses, past employment, cars he drives among other things. This is all doxing! Any personal information you reveal about a person that they did not reveal is doxing.

Druff and his co-horts seem to think this is OK because Mitchel is on youtube soliciting money as part of his scam. Well I don't distinguish the soliciting part as much as others do. Scamming and misleading people with false bullshit that will have them lose their money is scamming...period. The solicitation just takes it to a higher level.

Mdawg is scamming people with mis-information that anyone trying what he claims will be hurt financially, and backed off and barred for attempting a 1-50 spread and I could list 100 things.

So if it is OK to dox Mitchel and reveal anything you find that contradicts his bullshit claims, and I believe it is, and Druff himself justifies that, I see no difference in doing so with Mdawg. The information that comes to light will prove he is not who he claims and not winning as he claims. It will prove the Mdawg adventure, nothing more than a scam, not all that different than Christopher mitchel, except Mitchel takes it a step further with the solicitaion of money.

Again, the pertinent question is why does someone like Mdawg not use his real name if he has nothing to hide. He isn't hiding from the casinos like most APs are. He plays rated, making sure they know who he is, to get every ounce of comps due him. So the only people he is hiding from are the members of these different forums who would find out who he really is and what his story really is.

Now there are a lot of people on this forum of late that no longer believe me or anything I say or any part of my claims. Or at least that is what they say, i don't really believe that. So they essentially think I am the same kind of scammer I am accusing Mdawg of being. Ok fine, If anybody can prove that, prove that I am Tom Reilly, living in Albuquerque, working as a night watchman and not who I claim, then they are free to do that. If they can prove that I am Sally Hutton, living in Vegas, but working at the dollar store and not who/what I claim, they should and are free to do that. If they can prove any of the ridiculous claims, male prostitution, to about 100 other things, that would prove my claims false and me a scammer, they should do that. That would be doxxing, but I think that would be fair game because I would have been misleading or scamming people.

But the fact is nobody can or has proven a damn thing like that. All they do is make up silly, silly shit, with no proof, just attempting to discredit or smear me.

In short, I believe doxxing a person misleading, or scamming, myself included is justifiable if it proves they are not who they claim in misleading people. Whether that be a Christopher Mitchel who takes it to the next level with the solicitation, or an Mdawg, who is such an expert manipulator with his picture and shit, or me, if I am not who I say and claim.

---

I have to disagree. Christopher Mitchell charges people and scams them directly, there are no ifs ands or buts about that.

I have yet to hear of anyone claiming that of MDawg or anything close. Love him or hate him, he shouldn't be Doxxed. If he does it to you or someone. I wouldn't personally blame them for returning the favor.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Since this thread is about Kewl I wanted to make a statement and probably just leave him alone for now. I sometimes feel a bit overly mean dissecting his nonsense when it has such obvious importance in his life. There is some line where is becomes bullying and I'm definitely in that area.

However 2 things.

I reached out to him in private. If he would admit that shuffler story was BS (I may have even worded that he could just fess up to part of it being a lie), then I would not tell anyone AND I would stop being mean to him. That is when he told me "it is all true and fuck you!". So ok. That is a reasonable response if his lies were true but clearly they are not. I was just giving him a sincere chance to act like a reasonable human and he decided to not and tell me to fuck off. So when he came back after his promised disappearance that is when I broke down why the full shuffler story is as bad or worse than the backrooming. I had given him a sincere chance. There was no trolling or anything like that.

The other thing is his incessant proving Singer and Mdawg aren't what they claim. He has been relentless on a search for "the truth". Just because Kewl's lies are crafted to be sustainable and Singer/Mdawgs are meant to be fantastic and entertaining doesn't change anything. In fact, I would argue that what Kewl has been doing is more harmful. He is enticing people to get into that life when it is very very questionable whether he does what he says he does. People out there wanted to believe Kewl's fable and he has so desperately craved this attention and respect. Even when the guy is pressed into a corner he falls back on the "but but my life is possible due to the math". No one going to LV to beat UX from hearing Singer. Same with Mdawg. Kewl though tries his best to be believable and persuasive and thus has the largest chance of actually convincing people.

Which is a better posterchild for getting guys to drop it and move to LV to count cards? ZK or Kewl? lol.

---

Basically you are saying that MDawgs stories are insignificant to everyone because they have zero value regardless if they are true or fake, because they affect no one other than the dumb fucks who believe in nonsense -EV and are inspired by all the winning BSstories? His biggest fan (probably himself) was a big fat proven fraud.

---

Well, yea.. Everything but the second sentence. I still like Mdawg

---

We all have some major faults. I won't hold that against you.

PloppyDawg claims he's playing with an advantage. There are multiple posts that clearly suggest the contrary. I just happened to accidentally click on this one since it's at the beginning of one of these threads.

Read this and tell me this guy knows anything about Advantage play.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

No one's trying to make a living at gambling. But at the same time, if I lost money at it I wouldn't continue with it. I just somehow have managed to stay ahead, and the only dent they have made in my progress was when they banned (handicapped) my BJ play. To summarize, they got tired of my wild fluctuations between table min and table max at double deck BJ and that I was winning all of my table max bets including many double downs. Obviously the count alone could not have justified such luck, but after this went on for a number of days on yet another winning trip, the casino I was playing at, owned by Steve Wynn, stepped in and "handicapped" me - to a 3X spread.

"From now on if you bet $25. on a hand, you can't bet more than three times that, $75., on the next. No more $25. $2500. $25. $2500."

The limit at that time was $2500. This wasn't that long ago actually, about twenty or so years ago, but that was the limit at that casino at that time, $2500. This was when I was barely of legal age to gamble, but I had been playing blackjack and other card games since I was about eight years old, for fun, so I may have been relatively new to casinos but not new to playing cards.

After the BJ "ban" (handicap), I stayed away from Vegas entirely for almost two years, came back to the same casino, kept playing the same way, won for a matter of hours only, and got booted again from BJ.

Then I switched to Baccarat, and won even more at it than I had ever won at BJ. Eventually I became friends with the Director of Table Games who had set the handicap on me, who had since transferred to a different Wynn casino on the Strip, and he let me resume BJ play, and even laughed about how I liked to alternate between table min and max. But for whatever reason, I never really went back so hard to BJ, and have stuck with Baccarat. I just feel more comfortable betting big at Bacc.

I still play double deck BJ occasionally, but there is only one casino on the strip where they stand on soft 17 double deck BJ, so I pretty much play BJ at that casino only. There is one other casino, off the strip, where the double deck BJ is not only stand 17 but allows resplit aces and comes to a 0.14 house edge, but I am banned entirely from that casino - they fear me.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Basically you are saying that MDawgs stories are insignificant to everyone because they have zero value regardless if they are true or fake, because they affect no one other than the dumb fucks who believe in nonsense -EV and are inspired by all the winning BSstories? His biggest fan (probably himself) was a big fat proven fraud.

---

Well, yea.. Everything but the second sentence. I still like Mdawg

---

We all have some major faults. I won't hold that against you.

PloppyDawg claims he's playing with an advantage. There are multiple posts that clearly suggest the contrary. I just happened to accidentally click on this one since it's at the beginning of one of these threads.

Read this and tell me this guy knows anything about Advantage play.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

No one's trying to make a living at gambling. But at the same time, if I lost money at it I wouldn't continue with it. I just somehow have managed to stay ahead, and the only dent they have made in my progress was when they banned (handicapped) my BJ play. To summarize, they got tired of my wild fluctuations between table min and table max at double deck BJ and that I was winning all of my table max bets including many double downs. Obviously the count alone could not have justified such luck, but after this went on for a number of days on yet another winning trip, the casino I was playing at, owned by Steve Wynn, stepped in and "handicapped" me - to a 3X spread.

"From now on if you bet $25. on a hand, you can't bet more than three times that, $75., on the next. No more $25. $2500. $25. $2500."

The limit at that time was $2500. This wasn't that long ago actually, about twenty or so years ago, but that was the limit at that casino at that time, $2500. This was when I was barely of legal age to gamble, but I had been playing blackjack and other card games since I was about eight years old, for fun, so I may have been relatively new to casinos but not new to playing cards.

After the BJ "ban" (handicap), I stayed away from Vegas entirely for almost two years, came back to the same casino, kept playing the same way, won for a matter of hours only, and got booted again from BJ.

Then I switched to Baccarat, and won even more at it than I had ever won at BJ. Eventually I became friends with the Director of Table Games who had set the handicap on me, who had since transferred to a different Wynn casino on the Strip, and he let me resume BJ play, and even laughed about how I liked to alternate between table min and max. But for whatever reason, I never really went back so hard to BJ, and have stuck with Baccarat. I just feel more comfortable betting big at Bacc.

I still play double deck BJ occasionally, but there is only one casino on the strip where they stand on soft 17 double deck BJ, so I pretty much play BJ at that casino only. There is one other casino, off the strip, where the double deck BJ is not only stand 17 but allows resplit aces and comes to a 0.14 house edge, but I am banned entirely from that casino - they fear me.

---

---

To clarify about Mdawg being his own #1 fan. I just have no clue. It is sorta beyond the realm of actual real gambling so I have no interest. Chip porn is kinda cool.

I really just don't read what the guy says because it doesn't interest me. I also don't read Kewl's stuff about Mdawg. I read Mdawg's anti-Kewl stuff much closer and.. well.. he's relentless. I just read it in awe.

Much like Singer I can never tell where the joke vs the serious starts and stops. Probably far more seriousness with these guys .. I just can't imagine.

Singer brought a good time to this forum with his preposterous tales complete with his weird documentation. Ducking MaxPen and whomever else. Mdawg's basic story though isn't that.

And to sum it up. You're flat out wrong about Mdawg being his #1 fan. He is #2. Kewl is #1. Same with Singer's #1 fan. ha!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Now there are a lot of people on this forum of late that no longer believe me or anything I say or any part of my claims.

---

No, it's probably only the most distrustful few on this site that don't believe a single word you say. It's apparent that the those telling the tallest tales here spend a lot of time in a casinos. A good storyteller knows to sprinkle in a lot of truths with their fiction... but just because the things you say don't defy the math doesn't mean we are more likely to believe them. It's been said you've underestimated the membership of this forum and I'd agree.

KJ, of any poster, most espoused the math, but, he posted the least math, if any, but, of course, made excuses for that too, such as working only the simplest of counts. Regardless, I could never figure that anyone read it. Same with Singer, no matter who responded to him. Alan was another dope. Very vapid stuff. I liked the daily interjections by Monet, V, and the others who kept things in the present, presence of mind.