That may have to do with comped drinks. I've seen many single-credit players at the bartops, and heard bartenders complain about them.
Printable View
1) I didn't contradict myself.
2) I didn't pick a fight with that Charlatan, I just called him on his bullshit. He picked a fight with me, and started in with the Racist stuff.
3) You've been on here since 2014, and claim I seek attention from strangers? LOL
4) But, keep listening to the fraud.
The only thing I can say here is short term results can be different than long term results. Personally my short term sessions added together have not turned into typical long term results and I have 2 years of actual consecutive game data to back that up. Have I just been lucky?? For 2 years... doubtful. I also have session results that go back even further which seem to support what I'm seeing.
Now I'm not saying that I believe everything Singer is claiming here... but do I believe that he could end up a winner after 4 years playing his strategy? Yes, I definitely think it's possible.
And I think that's the key right there. Recreational players typically get up from a machine after they've lost their money. We constantly see people get way up hitting numerous great hands, but then just keep on pounding until the machine takes a nosedive and cleans them out. When this happens there is likely a little EV left in that machine because it will have to eventually go on another positive deviation to get back to average RTP. That part is simple to understand.
The tricky part is figuring out the exit points for any given game variant.
WTF!! I thought this was a forum of advantage players (even recreational) that understand the math. :confused:
Singer System:
1. Special plays. which by definition is LESS optimal (even more -EV) plays NEGATIVE
2. Progression wagering which can never overcome a house advantage. NEGATIVE
3. Stop limits. changes nothing. NEGATIVE
NEGATIVE + NEGATIVE + NEGATIVE Does NOT equal a positive.
And the "short term argument is an argument made by degenerate gambler type plays. Period. You know what short term wins playing negative expectation is called? It is called variance!
You might as well play your standard martingale, or pick your favorite number playing roulette. You might win short term with these just as well. But it does not make them a winning "system". And neither is Rob's nonsense. :rolleyes:
And the argument slapinfunk makes about never seeing the long-term is the rational that losing players make. In blackjack AP's run simulations consisting of 10's even 100's of millions of rounds. But that doesn't mean you have to play 10's of millions of rounds. THAT advantage is in effect from round 1.
And it works the same way with VP. It works the same way with every game. You need something that flips that advantage to the player. And stacking negative voodoo concepts on top of one another isn't that something. This isn't opinion, this is mathematical fact.
Have we just gone total voodoo here in addition to total Troll?
Good to see Kewlman showing up to drop some undeniable math on Singer.
Nice to see kew's blood pressure tick up a couple notches because of me again. :) Maybe his weak heart will even pop a valve!
What's most amusing to me is kewl still can't figure out why people don't like him?? It's obvious he knows very little about Singer's strategies, and for sure he has no clue what I'm doing, but he acts like he knows everything there is to know about gambling. But yeah... people don't like him cuz he's gay ;)
I'll bite because I'm bored.
You're more likely to be a lifetime winner going for the big payouts in a high variance game and being an outlier or quitting very very early on while you're still ahead.
From anything in the last few pages of this thread - singer is solidly neither.
But ultimately if he wants to claim he is up then who besides kewl cares? Let the old dude have his time to shine.
You disqualified yourself on this long ago. I molded you into a liar and Singer hater with ease by ridiculing your truly meaningless life---and ESPECIALLY compared to mine. That masterful manipulation coerced you into not wanting to believe or wish anything positive about what I've done. Just. Like. Kew.
Pat on the back please.....
Actually Robert you know very little about him or his life.
But that won't stop you...no way,no how.
*golf clap*
It's a good thing that a plow has two handles. Useless as shit of two different posters on both handles.
---> List of indigenous peoples of the Northeastern Woodlands.
https://anagram-solver.net/Its%20a%2....?partial=true
VCT is much worse than a snake pit. It pits one severe mental illness against another.
Well sure, if you add two negative numbers the answer is still a negative number.
But as everyone knows when you multiply two negative numbers they become a positive.
So all you have to do is play a negative EV play a number of times that is negative EV multiply them together & Voila! - Positive Number!
You could also take a negative EV play and document every time you don’t play it. So if you don’t play a negative EV play 5 times, you have negative 5 plays.
You then multiply the negative EV number by the negative number of times you played, giving you a positive number, & then all you have to do is go ahead and collect that profit!
I thought you'd like that V. But here's the real reply:
What do I "know" about AQ? Now WHY on earth would I want to know ANYTHING about about someone who appears to be easily offended, who holds grudges, who wears his jealousy on his sleeve, and who's not very good at hurling insults....although I've heard he's just an old bum of a guy with zippo going on.
Please....hold the applause.
With zippo going on? This a smoking reference?0
Whatever you say idiot. I'm a blunt force insulter with you and redietz because you're both cut of the same cloth. Redietz though could be cool when he's not being bitter. You're past being anything but bitter so enjoy that for the rest of your life.
The only time you haven't insulted is when you were trying to pat yourself on the back with your special plays nonsense.
It is gambling. Do whatever you wish. Just don't try and convince anyone it is sensical .
That's where kewl and I have to regulate.
Lol
You need to take a class Paco, because it just isn't working out.
AQ, you're a failed forum influencer with nothing significant ever going on in your boring life. You try and try more than anyone. All you've got to show for it is arguments with kew and redietz. I attribute your misrepresentation about me to simple envy....which I REALLY like, if I haven't reiterated prior.
What's that!?---you're perplexed at the putdown?? Next time you claim to "never respond to a Singer post again" you might want to do what you say you're gonna do. I weaken you with every one of your replies. And there's no telling the amount of damage I succeeded in doing to such an old lonely useless fart with my successful manipulation skills.
Wise up....and reclaim what little dignity you had.
Wow I can't believe how bent out of shape you all got from this alternate hold.
I ever tell you about the time I broke up 3 aces on DDB for 3 to the royal and actually hit the royal?
I'm actually not referring to within-session nutcase-edness, which I assume can be X-rayed if someone really wants to, but session-to-session nutcase-edness. I don't think any slot manager thinks someone who bounces from playing 25-cents one session to $2 or $5 the next is utilizing sophisticated strateeeegerizing, as Rob alleges. Management just assumes either (A) they are chasing losses or (B) they hit something big somewhere, so they are firing away on that property in the here and now. These volatile profiles are becoming more and more common as a percent of the gambling population. Rob was just ahead of the curve by a decade or two.
Show me where I said I'd never respond to you. Perhaps I said that but most likely a figment of your imagination.
At least your bullshit has been funny at times. Whether intentional or not is the question. We will never know but also won't ever see pictures of your made up assets. Just like kewl.
I print out my redietz and kewl arguments and they're all over my walls... but at least I have walls in which I can do this. Yanno?
Failed forum influencer is a decent one.
The most impressive thing about you is the absence of shame. Seriously
First, we HAVE seen pictures of Rob's made up assets. Are you forgetting the Newell (that didn't belong to him), the stacks of prop money cash? Somewhere on this forum there is even a video of Rob giving a tour of his daughter's house, claiming it was his, when public records prove otherwise.
You say I don't do this. Damn right I don't! For the life of me, why would any real player, real person with real assets, even modest such as myself, post pictures to prove anything to some idiots on an anonymous forum? Are people really THIS insecure?
I am immediately suspicious of anyone who posts such pictures. And that includes the person that posts as Mdawg. I know a top AP in this town, (doesn't post here much anymore) that swears Mdawg only has access to those assets that he posts pictures of. (meaning friend, family, boss). I don't know if that is true or not, but who needs to impress people on the internet to this extent? Seriously?
AccountinQ, YOU and others accuse me of this very mentality that you just expressed, frequently asking why I keep up going after someone like Singer or Mdawg long after it was necessary. And the answer, as you just figured out, is these people don't stop. This isn't my first go around with these type of people making these type of all but impossible math defying claims. They just never stop, even after being thoroughly exposed. They just keep going, oblivious to the fact that they were totally debunked, by say pictures of a Newell at the dealership for example. :rolleyes:
And the same with this Singer system. First, he claimed he played it for a decade making millions. Then he cut it down to 4 years to make room (on the timeline) for the double up bug claim that he stole. the fact is he did not play this system and make any kind of serious money. It is NOT a winning system. But he will keep coming back with the claim, so you have to keep reminding him that it isn't real. he just never lets up. That is the way with all these guys.
Look at Dawg. 7 months he posted daily reports of almost nothing but wins. Totaling millions. Then after being caught, he made a one line statement that "he was about even". You would have thought that would have been the end. But no. 2 days later he was back starting all over with the win-every-day claims. :rolleyes: These guys just never quit.
EXACTLY!! Why on earth would I? :confused:
It isn't me that needs help "bro". It is you idiots on an internet forum demanding that someone post pictures of a surfboard he used 25 years ago when a teenager. Or pictures of a bank account showing a settlement deposits. Or pictures from the balcony of where I live or the simming pool area. Or pictures of my brother.
These are all things demanded of me on an internet forum.
Are you guys actually SERIOUS with this nonsensical inquiry?
C'mon, man...why would KJ or anybody hang on to a pic of a surfboard they briefly rode as a teen?
Hell, I don't have any pics of my first girlfriend either, so does that mean I never knew her?
How about you guys...go ahead and post a pic of your first bicycle, or maybe your first tennis racket.
Go ahead, I'll wait...
He keeps asking why would he ...
This is the simplest thing ever asked to prove any level of validity from the guy....
Why would he ??!?!?!? Seriously! Why would he !?!?!?!!? Trolls!
Same surfboard MrV. What is made up is the part by smurgerburger that we took that board to California last summer. We rented boards on our California trip. The board in question that all these duffuses troll about is 25 years old cracked and hasn't been used, nor could it for a very long time. Since my brother was a teen and he is now in his 30's.
the board doesn't even belong to me, it belongs to my brother. I guess some sentimental value. It does nothing but collect dust now.
But these guys, including smurgerburger, just lie and make up whatever they want.
Smurgerburger needs to stop lying and making up whatever he wants.
Well, it could have been the subject of a photo that could lend you just a shred of credibility. However if you claimed that you did not take that board on your trip then I'm sure some of us may have been honestly mistaken. But it's hard even for you to keep all of your BS straight, let alone us.
The surfboard is in his apt and possibly his brother's room.
Mdawg would know.
I feel like we need an AI tool that has been trained on all kewls forum posts. Ask it questions.
Uh..you were asked to post pics of your surfboard, or your residence, or your pool.
I'm not even bothering to read your tale of two surfboards but the point is nobody believed you were on a surfing trip and you declined to offer any evidence.
And you can't even make the claim that you refuse to give in to "trolls" because you actually did try to support your story that you were at UNLV shortly before the shooting by posting a picture of the campus a few days later after that story was similarly met with skepticism.
You people are freaking NUTS with this trolling shit. And frankly growing even nuttier.
Oh look, its the imbecile who thought it a good idea to visit Florida in August with the heat and humidity and hurricane season.
I guess money can't buy common sense.
Posting up a pic of a surfboard is just going to get the trolls to call it fake. Fucking idiots. Get your mama to post a pic of a surfboard. Motherfuckers think they can get get you to jump thru hoops.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeyCrimm
Shackelford interviews a fraud. Very Clintonesque don't you think?
https://wizardofodds.com/video/rob-singer-interview/
LOL
True statement. Pictures get interpreted according to the agenda of those who choose to comment. And when the commenters aren't happy with their failed influence, they concoct other lies. Your pics of road trips to various casinos, for instance. They turn it into a bum hitting a bunch of obscure tribal casinos for chump change.
This is the forum life. Where the little people survive.
Lol singer trying to make these things analogous. You are nothing like mickey. No one says mickeys pictures are fake.
But please continue to grasp on the tiny bit of support you receive from a known professional gambler.
Singer will go to a dealership to sit in an RV - take pictures posing in their RV and then pass it off as his on the internet.
He won't post a picture of his beast car. Very surfboard like.
Yeppers. always projection with these types.
I sure as fuck never wanted to write articles for a gambling magazine.
What the fuck are you trying to prove? Post a pic of anything and everyone here will call it fake, including you. Thats not just for KJ. It's for everyone here. A troll is a troll, period. They will never believe any evidence you provide. There is always an argument that its fake.
I laugh at the idiots than want you to list your sources. The idiots are trying to get you to do their research for them. So I'm supposed to spend my valuable time to placate the idiots? I don't let idiots get me to jump thru hoops.
It isn't much trouble to post a picture of my the surfboard. Same as it wouldn't be any trouble to post a picture from my balcony or any of the other shit you trolls demand proof of. But like mickey said, you wouldn't accept it anyway.
Remember last year when I mentioned I was on an east coast trip. Coach belly, I think, or someone challenged that I even was. So I posted a picture of my friends back yard in Montgomery County (Philly suburbs), with lots of trees and grass. Didn't prove where I was, but it sure as hell proved I wasn't in Vegas. And it was Belly who then challenged that picture. Later that same trip I posted something while eating lunch at a casino in Morgantown Pa. Someone also challenged that, so I walked outside and took a picture of the casino and posted it. And people called that fake or staged or something.
So exactly as mickey said, there just is no satisfying you trolls. So why bother. better to adopt a policy of not feeding the trolls. "No soup for you, troll!". By the same token, I no longer even vote in the polls you trolls make. Troll polls. :D Just no point.
Is that really your concern, that I wouldn't accept it?
My comment about that backyard was obviously satirical, but you were to dense to understand. Go back and read it again, dummy.
You have no way of knowing what your current set of detractors will accept or not, you are contriving a future scenario and using it as a deflection.
That's a primary reason you have detractors in the first place.
Of course I do! It is from YEARS of experiencing you trolls. If I say the sky is ble, and grass green, someone will doubt me.
And that is on you trolls....not me! You troll and troll and troll and no one takes anything you say seriously after a while. Every heard "the boy who cried wolf"?
It REALLY would explain some things......a lot of things actually :rolleyes:
But I have to assume that he wouldn't be stupid enough to be playing the part of the mule in moving this shit himself, so I would doubt it. But who knows....peoples stupidity, especially involving drugs and drug dealings always amazes me.
Seems like you may have hit a nerve with this Dawg drug dealer thing, MrV. :D
KJ, I can not see him being a mule; more of a sort-of king-pin.
I read that seventy pounds of blow washed up on Florida shores recently.
Putting two and two together...whoa, in addition to getting hammered in the stock market recently he also lost a bale of blow?
This our guide claimed was Frank Lopez's mansion,
https://i.imgur.com/FizHgFUl.jpg
but I think he was wrong. I believe Frank's place was a different property.