https://i.imgur.com/3nmNeg9m.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
Printable View
https://i.imgur.com/3nmNeg9m.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
Dan Druff's opinion is of no greater value than yours...which is to say of no value at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
You are the main troll here, trolling MDawg, Singer & Alan, among others, for years.
You've made 3 times the number of posts as I have, in 2.5 fewer years.
Who are you to call me a troll?
Your contention is your worthless opinion...nothing more.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
MDawg has the receipts, you only have a novel's worth of fabricated stories.
Dan Druff's opinion is of no greater value than yours...which is to say of no value at all...but you quote it like it's gospel.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
You are the main troll here, trolling MDawg, Singer & Alan, among others, for years.
You've made 3 times the number of posts as I have, in 2.5 fewer years.
Who are you to call me a troll?
Number of posts is not what makes a troll. Doing nothing but trolling is what makes a troll.
And let's see...you, Belly have been banned at one forum, WoV, for trolling. Most bans are for refusing to follow the rules ECT. Few for trolling. Wizard made it a point to not only ban you, but specifically call out your nothing but trolling.
And here? Well Druff rarely bans. But he has also taken the unusual step if calling you a troll and saying you do nothing but troll.
What the fuck more do you need?
Count up your posts about MD, RS & AM.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
There's 10 thousand troll posts right there.
When it comes to Las Vegas, you are a complete fraud.
But when it comes to trolling, you are in a league of your own.
And we don't need any forum admin to tell us THAT...THAT is all about the math.:D:o:):confused::mad::p;):rolleyes::cool::eek :
DanDruff revised his opinion upwards for MDawg over the years, after he reviewed the evidence. DanDruff would like nothing better than for this lying UNKewl charlatan to leave his forum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
As to UNKewlJ, he revised his opinion...downwards, to the basement levels.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
It is only your opinion that Dan Druffs opinion has no value. I value Druffs opinion, as well as that of other AP's. And I don't see many real AP's or even real players that know how things work that doubt me and most of what I claim in regards to blackjack and what I do.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
And I say that even though Dan Druff has said he doesn't believe the back-rooming incident. I mean I admitted I made up the parts about a lawsuit and explained why, so THAT isn't even in question. But the incident itself, I am just not willing or in some cases allowed to prove the incident. So if Druff or anyone else wants to doubt it, I am ok with that.
In hindsight, I handled the entire incident poorly. Sometimes I am so eagar to share something like this incident, so as to warn other players of a casinos actions. But again, in hindsight, I should have never mentioned this incident until whatever actions were going to happen had already occurred.
But in my defense, when I mentioned it, some 3 weeks after it occurred, I had decided not to pursue anything. It was only after I changed my mind, that it became problematic for me, as far as people digging, be able to discover identifying information about me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgUNKewlJ has remained consistent in beingQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
WHERE? Please link to or quote where Druff has revised his opinion that is in my signature. Or we can just ask him.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
This is also more Mdawg bullshit. I am aware Dan Druff does not believe the back-rooming incident. Again, nothing I can do about that as I am just unwilling to show the evidence that would prove the incident.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
But I am not aware that Dan Druff doubts who I am and what I do. As a matter of fact, in the last month, he stated that he defended me as a card counter to someone.
So again, please link to or quote this statement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by smurgerburger
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeyCrimm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Finkle
Simple enough to solve. Let's just ask Druff.
Dan Druff:
What is your opinion on me (kewlj) and my claims of blackjack play and what I do.
What is going opinion if Mdawg claims of all the winning? Has it changed from what I am quoting in my signature.
I'll answer for him since I am more articulate, I'm older with far more life experience, and my intelligence is on a higher level than anyone here.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Your bj stories, while technically detailed very well, also depict an extreme level of interest in the game---almost beyond an obession. But to what end?
Well, a REAL professional bj player would NEVER spend the majority of his or her time trying to convince a small collection of nobodies of their supposed bj prowess....and constantly being very upset over the fact that other players here have reported sessions of winning that render your "personal reports" irrelevant. WHY WOULD YOU EVEN CARE ABOUT HOW OR HOW MUCH THEY SAY THEY'VE WON, WHEN IT HAS ZERO TO DO WITH ANYTHING IN YOUR PATHETIC LITTLE LIFE BUT SLEEP?
But do you really win? Inasmuch as you claim to have seen mdawg's personal gaming records, I have seen your personal LIFE'S records....and under far more believable circumstances, where you were the cause of your owm humiliation stemming from your actions right here. They are not pretty, and they have near nothing in common with the confirmed lies you tell here.
In short, you're just another LV gambling addict and casino action junkie who likes to believe they're some kind of advantage player because of the comps they get. And, it gives a boost to the concocted life you spread around the gaming forums.
Mdawg? While whether he wins more than he loses is completely meaningless to your BS story, he at least didn't shy away from having a live witness, he's offered challenges that all you do is criticize because you're afraid of what the results might be, and he is open to verifications right at the casino level.
We understand why YOU never offer up anything, including pictures. It's because you're a known and proven fabricator. IE---you're a big fat serial liar about yourself and others.
And THAT'S why you are so addicted to constantly arguing with everybody online. You've made a massive fool of yourself and you will never get or accept it....while EVERYONE else has.
"You have seen my life records" is just more Rob Singer bullshit.
You have seen nothing. Nor has your make believe nephew that works for the FBI revealed anything about me.
Just more Singer bullshit, on the level of the Newell bullshit, fake jackpots, and phony amazon "prop" money in your safe.
And NO, you don't get to speak for Dan Druff. No one cares what you think. What a goofball you are.
I find this narrative that I care what other people here think funny. Haven't I proved that I don't. I could very easily prove some things, but choose not to.
There are a very few people here that I respect, Dan Druff, despite that he doesn't believe at least part of the backroom incident. Several AP's, like mickeycrimm, Axelwolf, despite that we don't agree on all thing and negative words sometime said. MrV, just because he is a real player (not AP) and regular guy. And a few others.
But generally, if someone, AP or not, and there are many AP's that just have a lot of troll in them, ;), chooses not to believe something I have said or shared, or even anything about me, it is no skin off my nose. Changes nothing.
Don't confuse that I waste a lot of time on this forum, especially in recent years as I have transitioned to playing less blackjack and doing more stuff from home (sports betting) with that I care what most here think. It is just entertainment.
As for Dawg and why I care. I have explained it a number of times. I just don't like that shit. It is disrespectful to myself and every other real AP that wins and actually works at winning, to have some clown come along telling these bullshit stories. A lot of Ap's don't care, or don't care enough to say too much. But I just dont like it. So I will say so, as long as he keeps it up.
And THAT is trolling. :mad::p;):D:o:):(:confused::rolleyes::cool::eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Once again, you just couldn't help yourself. You HAD to try and explain away the very truths everyone else sees about you. You could have tried to do it in your first denial post, but the veracity of my post made you read it multiple times over, because it bothered you to have to read about yourself that way. A true weak person.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
It's all right there you idiot. You already know you have no credibility here or anywhere else. And as you continue to embarrass yourself by trying to explain away and justify why you lied about that stupid backrooming whopper, you dive deeper into your self-created abyss. I kinda like that by the way :)
Obviously, you don't want how & what I discovered about you and your phony internet life to be believed....but as a nervous liar, you REQUIRE & NEED everyone to believe your big lie about seeing mdawg's casino records. And by the way, why aren't you claiming to have seen his bank accounts, credit reports, and ss# also? I've seen yours and you know it. That's why you waste time with denials whenever you have to face the music.
You need another gig, fool. Worrying about mdawg, me, and why no-one believes your fake online existence ain't cutting it.
**yawn**
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Why isn't this retard making up more fake baccarat sessions?
AI input on MDawg:
Mission146, another active member on the Wizard of Vegas forum, did indeed take the time to tabulate mdawg's wins. This was a pretty significant effort and stirred some discussion among the forum members. Mission146 tracked mdawg's baccarat and blackjack sessions and documented the results, which helped provide a more objective view of mdawg’s success at the tables.
The tabulation wasn’t just about raw results—it also provided insight into mdawg’s betting patterns, strategies, and the variance involved in their wins and losses. It helped highlight that even successful players experience swings and that consistent wins, while possible, often come with ups and downs.
While it doesn’t guarantee that mdawg’s approach will work for everyone, it did offer evidence of success over time and showcased the potential of using solid strategy (like basic strategy and card counting) in a disciplined way. It also reinforced the idea that proper money management and understanding the odds are crucial.
Why isn't this retard making up more fake baccarat sessions?
https://i.imgur.com/GJ5216ml.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
That's something that'll quickly turn a slope's eyes round. Especially around here.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
A lot of people just talk about playing. While I am doing it. In fact, I am currently one of the top players in terms of both theo loss and actual win (and by top, I don't mean like top 100, or just top 10, I mean TOP), on the Strip. Now whether I am talking about one casino or more than one, I won't say, but suffice it to say...
or close.
I finally ran into a Bacc player who wins, like me.
This player just plays a few hands, selected from all of the shoes available in the room at any given time, then walks. No particular advantage I am aware of, obviously doesn't have a set up like me, but definitely wins big, not in the seven figure range as I have been able to do occasionally lately, but low to mid six figure takes regularly and I verified this both via talking to casino staff like dealers and pit bosses who said basically that he is killing them, but also I saw a document verifying win that was handed to the player by a high level casino staff right in front of me that I read.
Oh look, the retard is spouting more nonsense about how he's a uber secret AP despite the fact that he's retarded.
MD, 100s of people post pictures and videos of chips and play ON THE TABLE of winning hands during play(You never have!!!) This isn't very meaningful. Hell, one can easily get fake chips like this.
You could be using credit (money you dont have) to get chips to take pictures of.
Breaking even after claiming millions in wins? Yes, OFC you do. We all do.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Why isn't this retard making up more fake baccarat sessions?
I got stacks of six figure and even one (maybe more ;)) seven figure casino cage checks just from this year alone. The sum figures boggle the mind.
"VERIFIED TABLE WIN" in the memos all of them.
Cha'Ching!
Any questions?
I got one.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Ala Zen King I gotta ask...
" ?"
No one cares HabibQuote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
No keystroke....it bothers ALL of you losers. Especially the noodle-slurper. Those slopes are BORN degenerate gamblers....Quote:
Originally Posted by KeystoneNo one cares HabibQuote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Why yes, thanks for asking. I have questions. :) I am going to pose it in the form of a what if.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
So a higher limit player, visiting and playing Las Vegas for extended periods, betting the limits you claim would have many winning and losing sessions just like all non-AP gamblers. If he was playing big enough stakes these would include both 6 figure wins and losses. So what if every time he registered a large win, he requested to be paid by check "Verifying the win". But each session he lost there would be no record of, nor would he make any mention of.
What would that look like? :confused: He would have a stack of "verified win" checks to claim whatever narrative he is trying to claim and for whatever reason. BUT, the non-mentioned losses would more than offset that stack of "verified wins". :cool: And no I don't expect I will get an answer...just trolling.
Dawg, since the start of this thread and adventure (5+ years for this thread on this forum, several years more at WoV), you have tried to prove wins, by showing chips, cash, and now casino checks (with occasional high end watches thrown in for good measure). Yes, chips, cash and checks can be the result of winning sessions. But you making no mention of the losing sessions that more than offset those winning sessions is the scam you are perpetrating on members of both forums. Even you now buddy Rob Singer recognized this almost immediately.
You have always thought real players, that play, even if not at the level you play or claim to play, would be fooled by this. No real player has been. As Dan Druff, among others said, "something is missing or incomplete from this story". And that something is all the losing sessions and days.
How do I know this? Dare I say, casinos just do not allow a player to win the amounts you claim for 5-7 years now. And you claim to be playing rated, so they would absolutely know what you bottom line results are. It is just fantasy and everyone, recreational to real player knows it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobSinger
Degenerate gambler. When we hear this term, we tend to think of lower end gamblers gambling away every last dollar to the point that it effects their life and relationships with friends and family negatively. But a degenerate gambler doesn't have to be some lower end player gambling away his last dollar. It can be higher limit players that can afford to gamble and lose. So here is the definition I use: Engages in excessive, compulsive, and harmful gambling behaviors.
Bets for the rush of action above all else and isn't capable of making mathematically sound bets.
Mdawg fits that definition to a tee. Baccarat, craps, roulette seem to be the game of choice for degenerate gamblers (I guess slots as well). Baccarat in particular seems to draw these players. On every forum you see baccarat players claiming they are winning long-term when they are not. :rolleyes:
Here is the difference between advantage players that can and do win long-term and degenerate gamblers that only claim to. Advantage players can specifically point to something they are doing that gives them and advantage. Degenerate gamblers never can or do. It is always some goofy thing like "I am rainman" or some top secret thing that he can't talk about. :D
There is no secret sauce that can replace the math.
The problem isn't that it isn't fair. The problem is that it isn't real.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Dawgs claims are on the same level as Rob Singer claiming he won using a progressive betting system (that was before he stole the DU bug claim). Or on the same level as EvenBob/Spike's roulette claims. Or even the guy Soxfan's Baccarat claims. Or some of the Youtube guys like mikki Maze.
Absolutely nothing supported by math. Just long disproven voodoo concepts or some secret sauce that they can't talk about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
His "tales" don`t bother me, he does in general....much as you`ve publicized you don`t like weirdos, homos, or spear chuckers, I don`t like sand monkeys .... especially loudmothed ones that lie.....Get it dummy?.....Happy EasterQuote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerNo keystroke....it bothers ALL of you losers. Especially the noodle-slurper. Those slopes are BORN degenerate gamblers....Quote:
Originally Posted by KeystoneNo one cares HabibQuote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Surprise! Surprise! Surprise! (Gomer Pyle) No answer to the simple questions "what would that look like?" Just more trolling.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Something really wrong with this person.
I'm not advocating for MDawg with this comment, but what I've learned about kewlJ is that (1) he ignores anything you tell him that he doesn't want to remember or that doesn't make whatever case he's arguing and (2) he argues things that he knows amazingly little about. Like the line about why anyone would be a handicapper as opposed to a pure gambler. His take on this, considering that I've explained bits and pieces to him previously, is either dishonest or incredibly naive for someone who's allegedly (and I emphasize the "alleged" in allegedly) been playing blackjack professionally in Las Vegas for a decade plus. He's either dumb as a rock or completely disingenuous. Or both, I guess.
I suspect disingenuous, if I had a gun to my head to choose. Which means the dude(s) is/are dishonest.
I'll be more than happy to lay out the many and obvious reasons someone would be a public handicapper versus purely a solo sports gambler, but not on this forum. On the PFA broadcast, sure. Basically, if you can't figure out two or three reasons, God help you in everyday life, much less the business world or the world of sports gambling. But I'm willing to play Dragnet and lay it all out succinctly.
Over and out. And MDawg, feel free to quote me on this. I'm sure the kewlJ(s) will have a dozen responsive posts, but basically they'll all be bullshit. I'll be more than happy to disembowel what passes for KewJ(s) "logic" live.
I asked Mdawg a very simple question that he can't and won't answer. Now I am going to do the same with you Red. :)
You claim to be a professional sports bettor, who has made a living in the sports betting arena (which includes contests). I don't know whether you are or not. (please don't send me documentation from 1983).
But my simple question is why does a successful sports bettor, capable of picking winners at a rate enough to win (overcome vig), need investors and clients? Why not just pick winners? What do you need "clients" for?
Just like with Dawg, I won't hold my breath waiting for an answer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrimReaper
Why isn't this retard making up more fake baccarat sessions?
He is, he is. Go look at WOV.Quote:
Originally Posted by jdaewoo
To be fair as Tasha says, it’s a circle jerk between the 3 of you. Mdawg, Wiz and you.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfHe is, he is. Go look at WOV.Quote:
Originally Posted by jdaewoo
While I just satisfy myself to the pics the boys at WoV send me that Tasha sold them.
I think it's because they pay him...and you can never be too rich.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Do many gamblers make a habit of turning down freerolls?
I looked back in the thread and found where you wrote that you had questions...Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
...but there was only this question...Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Your "what if" hypothesis, that the losses would more than offset the wins, is not a fact, it's an assumption.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
That makes your silly "what would that look like?" question rhetorical...it requires no answer.
I find it hard to believe the KewlJ(s) are this stupid. The KewlJ(s) must never use financial consultants. All the same questions apply.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyI think it's because they pay him...you can never be too rich.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Do many gamblers make a habit of turning down freerolls?
I worry about professional blackjack players who pretend they're retarded on forums.
Just understand what it is you're looking at; those aren't tarantulas in the jungle, they're crabs in her bush.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
I see what you mean by pretending.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
He writes all about his multiple income streams, while unable to fathom why you wouldn't just stick to one.
That means he's telling another lie about himself.
Dave Chappelle was actually IN our suite at the Sphere for Dead and Company but strangely (or maybe not so strangely for a celebrity) he kept popping out to go not sure where. He actually stayed put in suite for only minutes at a time. I saw him pop into another neighboring suite too for a bit. He was very friendly shook hands with anyone who wanted and waved at fans from neighboring suites.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgYou mean...Quote:
Originally Posted by pinchingyourballs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLNDqxrUUwQ
I wouldn’t have even recognized him I’m not so into celebrity watch but one of the girls with me grabbed me and said, that’s Dave Chappelle!
When we watched the Knights at T Mobile get pummeled Game 2 Stanley Cup playoffs next door to us was the owner of the Wild team. Someone in our suite was a Minnesota fan and recognized him shook hands with him over the edge suite to suite.
At the Sphere I assume they have a way to get celebrities out quietly because otherwise it is quite impacted trying to get out of there at the end. Or maybe they just have to leave early because there’s no way to avoid at least the other suite occupants who will all be exiting to those levels together at the end of the event.
What the fuck is wrong with you Dawg?! You are one insecure narcistic dude, always trying to impress people.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgDave Chappelle was actually IN our suite at the Sphere for Dead and Company but strangely (or maybe not so strangely for a celebrity) he kept popping out to go not sure where. He actually stayed put in suite for only minutes at a time. I saw him pop into another neighboring suite too for a bit. He was very friendly shook hands with anyone who wanted and waved at fans from neighboring suites.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgYou mean...Quote:
Originally Posted by pinchingyourballs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLNDqxrUUwQ
I wouldn’t have even recognized him I’m not so into celebrity watch but one of the girls with me grabbed me and said, that’s Dave Chappelle!
When we watched the Knights at T Mobile get pummeled Game 2 Stanley Cup playoffs next door to us was the owner of the Wild team. Someone in our suite was a Minnesota fan and recognized him shook hands with him over the edge suite to suite.
The last time you tried to impress us with tales involving hockey players, you claimed you were playing blackjack with members of the Montreal Canadians hockey team. Problem was the Canadians hockey teams was quarantined in Canada at the time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Why isn't this retard winning 80% of his tie bets?
Don't be silly, who in the hell wants to win 8 to 1, 80% of the the time?Quote:
Originally Posted by jdaewoo
Except as you now know, it's about 25% over time. Not 80%.
Like I saidQuote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfBac79 Also posted up some of those things, it was all BS as none of it was his. He even claimed his boss's wife as his own. Had he lasted longer, he would have ramped up his game and posted more and more fake evidence.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgIn the history of these forums almost none have provided any back up for anything. My evidence was summarized here:
https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post173701
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
What Mike witnessed was very small potatoes in comparison to what you have been claiming.
I could post up a lot of real pictures of, cash, jackpots, Sports bets, chips, big hotel suites with pool tables, libraries, multiple balconies, slot tickets, stacks of W2g's, special event Invitational only offers, etc and I didn't/dont even take pictures of 10% of the shit. I don't care too, as it's all dushbagabragery and very dumb to do for the most part.
You need to read this entire post and the post after it,Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
MDAWG EVIDENCE
but let's face it, you are incapable of reading anything longer than a couple sentences without losing focus, so why bother?
Obviously you have no idea what has transpired and what evidence has been presented over the past six years if you think it comes down to just that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgEven when she lies, she ends up supporting the MDawg reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mdawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
I just ate some, not even that many of the regular macadamia nuts and am feeling like I done a bad thing.
https://i.imgur.com/y0X4h80l.jpg
So maybe the sprouted ones really are better?
https://i.imgur.com/QzrgJZ6l.jpg
But the problem with the sprouted ones is you end up eating the whole package because they aren't so filling....
Why isn't this retard out winning 80% of his tie bets?
It's been enough times that I don't find it to be random anymore.Quote:
Originally Posted by Keystone
It, being the fact that Middle Eastern people don't seem to like dogs, and we have the cutest little Yorkie in the world, where most people, regardless of race, can't wait to come and love up on him. Of course, when people get close, he gets all excited and starts barking for attention. He absolutely loves people.
It's been numerous occasions where I noticed that Middle Eastern people give you a dirty look and head the opposite way of the dog and or make a wide circle to get around you.
Today cemented it for me when the local gas station attendant Amir happened to be outside when I was filling up with gas. He was curiously peeking inside the window at our dog who is still inside the vehicle, but as soon as our dog started barking a little bit, Amir literally ran back to the door entrance.
As I entered the store Amir's buddy was laughing his ass off as he saw everything from the camera.
If that is true, then why did I have to do thisQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
I call B.S. on your ability to blow through a proxy, at least as far as any logins on this forum. I am sure all you get from your forum software is the WAN.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Put it this way, in a couple weeks, as I continue to use the same proxy as always, you tell me where I am posting from.
UNKewlJ doesn't use a proxy except when he is sock puppeting (which is often) but we already know from whence he posts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Why isn't this retard pretending to be a high roller?