What's this all about?...tewlj making another alias just to troll MDawg?
Everybody does, but nobody else creates 15 thousand posts and a bunch of new aliases to do that.
Try this instead...go fuck yourself.
Printable View
Kew, you're making a fool of yourself again. You falsely claimed I was some gal who called you on your bullshit about getting some type of loan with no job after you and your clan of mooches were forced out of Sugar Daddy's house, and you went running with it acting like it was gospel fact in order to pretend you weren't cornered. Now, someone calls you out for obviously posting as a sock at WoV--the place that broke your diseased heart by making you suffer the indignity of being permanently banned by the same owner who witnessed mdawg do what you said he couldn't--and you deny it because, well, you didn't say it!
No brain/no pain.
When I create a new acct at WoV, it is because I have something a little more to say that calling Mdawg's work fiction. I do that everyday here.
AND because I don't hide my IP address, because I am not really trying to hide who I am, any account I make usually lasts about 3 minutes. This DannyWarner post has been up what about 8 hours? You are barking up the wrong tree Dawg. Your freaking paranoid. It may very well be a sock puppet type duplicate account, but it is not me. Check my posting times on this forum. I didn't even wake up until an hour after the Dnnny warner post and first I heard about it was 10 minutes ago.
But I absolutely love how paranoid you are about it. :cool:
Dude, is that an insult?
I know it is SUPPOSED to be, but let's break it down, shall we?
Have we not all at one time or another (and some daily) "fucked ourselves?"
Stated differently, isn't "fucking yourself" another term for "masturbation?"
And isn't masturbation a pleasant experience?
So you are telling KJ to have fun.
Got it.
It's a directive...like "get fucking lost you annoying asshole"
It's such a common expression, yet you don't get it...you are so strange.
You're like some kind of clueless gangly uncoordinated nerd, trying to be cool.
Did you try to look like a girl before male pattern baldness set in?
Sorry to destroy your fantasy, but "No."
Go fuck yourself, I mean go slit your wrists...do it length-wise, not side to side for best effect.
Yeah, that's the ticket...take a handful of Hydrocodone or OxyContin, guzzle a bottle of Mad Dog, draw a hot bath, get in it and soak til you're relaxed, then cut yourself wide open and marvel at what happens.
Bonus points if you live stream...
I'd say "You can thank me later" but...
Coach, you gotta keep things in perspective.
Fun Facts to close 2025:
1) McDonald's employs 150,000 people in the U.S., a number which is falling fast.
2) The U.S. has 1,300,000 licensed attorneys, a number which is growing fast.
3) Home prices in Seattle, WA dropped 2.5% in November, a trend which is snowballing. NOT an AP play.
4) Home prices in Johnson City, TN were up 8.5% compared to last November, a trend which also appears to be snowballing. One could consider this an AP play.
5) If you rank all of the VCT posters in terms of gambling knowledge and Las Vegas experience, MrV is ahead of Tasha in gambling knowledge and is likely ahead of several posters in terms of Las Vegas experience. In the next 48 months or so, AI should be able to rank everyone with some precision by analyzing all posts attributable to a handle.
In addition, fun factoids vis-a-vis blackjack:
1) Roughly 40% of casinos currently employ facial recognition technology.
2) The two big strip companies, CET and MGM, report that they are employing facial recognition tech.
3) As such, every time someone steps into a casino on the strip (with the possible exception of Treasure Island), they are being facially profiled. Any exterior cameras would be able to profile also, provided the sidewalks are casino property. It makes perfect sense for a card counter to live on the strip, provided they are either (A) a Skrull or (B) Spider-Man's first villain, The Chameleon. I think the Spider-Man reference is particularly appropriate here.
4) Now if I were a casino manager on the strip and suspected someone was a card counter, I would simply have a member of the security team take a lengthy lunch and follow the person. If they go "home" and it's on the strip, end of counting. They will be identified. If they go to another casino in the immediate neighborhood as part of a rotation and try a hit-and-run, they are also identified as a counter and that's the end of that. I'm sure, however, that The Chameleon could pull this off for years while living on the strip. And Skrulls, yes, if they have some quick-change bathrooms scouted, they could pull it off, too.
5) All of this is LOL obvious.
So I guess the question(s) become why would a card counter, while keeping a lid on everything else, make public that he has a strip location as home base? Geez, I do not think Mensa is required here.
MDawg, feel free to quote any and all of this -- my Christmas gift to you. I expect a large coffee from Starbucks in return if our paths happen to cross in Las Vegas. Coach, I expect a scone.
versus
versus
This retard is a closeted homosexual.
You are such a goofball redietz. You are trying so freaking hard to prove me wrong. ;)
Facial recognition has never been as good in the casino environment as it is in other security setting like an airport. That is because unlike someplace like an airport, the "target" is not standing 3 feet away with a direct front on shot. It just does not work as well 300 feet way looking down at angles. Additionally, there are known ways to beat facial recognition, that are talked about on private forums that I am not going to mention here. I am not talking about hats or disguises, although hats do reduce the number of points that can be matched.
A much bigger problem for card counters is what grouped together is called behavior biometric analyzers. These claim to analyze body language and several other points, but really they are just the computerized evaluation of betting patterns that I have talked about. These aren't effective because 1) they must be ordered on a player, they can't evaluate every player and 2) the evaluation takes time...a certain number of rounds played, rather than time, but it comes down to time. Computerized evaluation have to see more than one time through the betting cycle. Depending on how quickly the game is being dealt, that can take anywhere from 30 minutes to over an hour (for slow weekend games). And the clock on that doesn't even start running until the player increases wagers and an evaluation is ordered.
I have several betting and playing strategies that I employ makes it much less likely that an evaluation will even be ordered. I have talked about them multiple times. But in the end, it all comes back to one thing. Shorter sessions. The evaluation or gathering enough information in the evaluation takes time....a fairly significant number of rounds. If you just don't sit at one table for long periods of time, you deny the time it takes to complete an evaluation.
About the only players that would be at serious risk from behavior biometrics are players playing the high limit rooms. Evaluations are under way on these kind of players, just as soon as they raise their bets even the smallest amount. This extra scrutiny is why real card counters don't play higher limit rooms. That kind of talk is for people writing fantasy "adventure" stories.
I particularly like Dietz's comments about security taking a long lunch to follow a player up and down the strip. You are reading too many old detective novels Mr Dietz. God, you want so badly to find something that proves I am not doing what I say I am. Keep trying and good luck.