Most suspect of all is Alan’s intense interest in defending “her”.
Printable View
Most suspect of all is Alan’s intense interest in defending “her”.
Actually I'm trying to keep the forum alive. But at this point it's hopeless. Differing opinions are not welcome here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dankyone
Well, not the only way. I used to just hold the high pair instead of two pair when playing DB & DDB, chasing the chance of quads vs. full house.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayThe only way to increase the quad frequency is to throw away full houses which would be highly foolish in most circumstances. The exceptions being a "big" quad progressive (rare, as quads hit, on average once every 420 hands with normal discarding strategy) or if you're playing a game like Royal Aces bonus (quad aces pay 800-1) and you have a full house with 3-aces in it (it wouldn't increase quads that much since you only do the throw-away for the Aces, not the other 12 suits).Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
A believe differing opinions are always welcome, assuming they stand up to common sense review. Saying the sky is lime green because you saw it happen isn’t going to fly without ridicule. No different than anywhere else in the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan MendelsonActually I'm trying to keep the forum alive. But at this point it's hopeless. Differing opinions are not welcome here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dankyone
I’ll say it again because it makes so much sense, you have to be playing a game Alan, you are not as gullible as you come off here.
Oh yea, f Rob Singer. Can you pass that on with my condolences on his loss when you talk to him today.
Okay Boz. So what did girlfriday write that was so offensive? Did she make any kind of "the sky is lime green" comments.
As I write this there are NINE forum members on the site but 183 viewing. Is it really that unvelievable for people to view this site for years and then one day decide to post?
you seem rather gullible and that is the basis for most of the back and forth.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan MendelsonActually I'm trying to keep the forum alive. But at this point it's hopeless. Differing opinions are not welcome here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dankyone
A new female poster who claims to be an AP and has read thos board for years, within 24 hours of joining assuring us that her intent was to set a banking question straight, starts to bash KJ, reidietz, MC and the admin/owner Dan. What a change from the docile diminutive person who posted the day before. Meaning the day before was a set-up for the next days tirade.
why the heck would a female banker AP who read this board for years, yet never posted till now, care if the owner threatened to prosecute some trolls . What standing does she have after less than 24 hours of postings to question the owner.
All she seemed to want to do is rehash the 2 tables thing with KJ(a topic that seems to have passed)......and start over with reidietz, and bash MC while pretending to be the AP that knows reality. Already within 24 hours of coming here just to comment on a banking issue....she has an ax to grind with a bunch of people.
what rule did she break? She broke the rule of dont fuck with the owner on your very first day. Rule 327a part ix, subsection p
she broke the rule of lying without credibility. Geez...if you are going to lie...at least put some serous thought into it so its believeable
why not just come here and say you are an astronaut AP and are posting from space....and then bash a bunch of posters.
alan, you are easily duped. My advice is to stay away from timeshare pitches..even if they give you a free meal or hotel stay. Dont watch info-mercials, dont take the leaflets from people on LVB, hang up on telemarketers, stay away from ebay, stay away from places that contain animal names, like rhino, bunny, chicken.
I was talking about YOU Alan and your ridiculous claims on Yo’s and loss rebates taking away any credibility you had to present a differing opinion and expect to be taken seriously.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
I don’t know Dan but he seems very reasonable and didn’t make the decision on a whim. I’m a gambler like you and I would bet you are playing a game and know exactly what this jackass Singer is up to. Only question is why you play the games like him.
I wasn’t around when he played the same games at WoV but it’s obvious he has done the same thing for years and is a POS. Reading what others have posted about his life over the years I honestly don’t get why you would associate with someone like him. Educate me, I’m all ears.
Compared to what others have written here? I'd say she was bland.
I'll also say (again) that if Rob was responsible for those posts he's a brilliant writer. The character he created was flawless.
I'm still interested in knowing if Kewlj would telephone Dan to prove his identity? Would anyone here do that? And how would you react?
There is no smoking gun guys. Make all the excuses you want, create all the justifications you want, but there's no smoking gun. There is a deep seated fear of Rob Singer, right kewlj? You think he's out to get your financial information. And then on WOV they were out to get your identity. It's a tough life you have.
Alan, why don't you just ask Rob if it was him or not? I have a feeling he lies to you as well. He has been lying about his VP system for years.
There was another guy who I thought it could be as well. But unless they are somehow using a VPN and misdirecting their IP in hopes of incriminating Rob, the evidence is overwhelming that its him.
Overrunning it with fake accounts and sockpuppets isnt the awnser(just ask the guy running GF). Since Singer has been gone there have been at least 2 REAL members that have joined in.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan MendelsonActually I'm trying to keep the forum alive. But at this point it's hopeless. Differing opinions are not welcome here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dankyone
I'll also say (again) that if Rob was responsible for those posts he's a brilliant writer. The character he created was flawless.
guiilble.....also stay away from the flawless Rowlecks watches sold on the street corner.
https://www.northernlightscentre.ca/northernlights.htmlQuote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...ado-is-coming/
Boz if you and everyone else are going to harp on me seeing a random shooter throw 18 yos in a row and if that's how you're going to judge me, please block my posts.
If you don't like that I said it's better to win than to collect a loss rebate, please block me.
If you don't like that I interviewed Rob Singer please block me.
I'm not here to kiss ass. I interviewed four presidents, the Queen of England, the King of Spain and I was among the first TV reporters to cover the famine in Ethiopia. Whether or not you or anyone else can convert $200 of a loss rebate into cash is a pimple on my ass.
I have two kids, I'm a grandfather and God gave me a second chance at life.
You and everyone else can use all the math you want to and dispute everything I say about everything but you're not going to tell me what's important and 18 yos, loss rebates and stop losses don't control my life. There's a big world out there and I've seen it and the rest of you can keep doing your coin flips.
I'm done.
I’ll book that bet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
I find that the "girl" was odd that she bashed the improbability of KJ;s 2 tables thing, the improbability of him getting a mortgage, the improbability that redtiez is real in his claims.... but never discussed the improbability of 18 yos in a row.
why would you think this is so
Outside of this forum and the WOV forum no one gives a damn about 18 yos in a row. At the time even I didn't think much about it or I would have gotten the tape.
Frankly I'm more concerned when I played at Caesars and all eight players at the table had point-seven. That meant more to me because it cost me a bundle.
But still answer the question....wht would the "girl" be so concerned with probabilities of something being true or doable
like Kjs 2 table comment which had lost board interest....but she needed to beat a dead horse
like reidietz.....real or not real?
like the probability of the owner being able to prosecute trolls
but she would not dig up stuff like a 100 billion to one probability of 18 yos in a row.
I think he...i mean she has a crush on allan
Like I said who cares about 18 yos in a row? If you have a minute call a local radio, tv station or news paper and ask if they have a gaming reporter? Outside of only a few cities I'm sure the answer is no. Then ask anyone on the assignment desk if they'd be interested in a story about a craps player who threw the number eleven 18 times a row? Then let me know how much longer they talk to you.
But it bugs people who want their Kool-Aid to cure you.
who cares about counting 2 tables.....but she did care
who cares about the accuracy of reditz claims.....but she did care
who cares about Dans ability to successfully sue trolls.....but she did care
so why wouldnt she care about something equally insignificant but at the same time much less probable than the above occurring.
see alan,,,,,you refuse toanswer th question because it brings chatty girl friday closer to being a friend of yours. It seems no one was spared in her tirade......except alan. Even the board owner who stays out of these long back and forth arguments was ridiculed
yes a guy that witnesses a one in a hundred billion occurrence, was not questioned.
why do you suppose
did u promise him/her sex?
why did u get a pass on the improbable insignificant things in life.