Quote:
Originally Posted by
unJon
That’s fine, KJ. Now that you’ve pegged “what I seem to be” you can put my posts into whatever box where you don’t pay attention to them. I made my point in my last post, and it was substantive not process related:
1) You either made a great bluff or a suboptimal non-bluff
2) What you did swayed no one not already inclined to think MDawg a fraud.
But RE Dietz is right that there’s no sense for me trying to penetrate the echo chamber you two have created here regarding MDawg. And like Mission, I don’t really care about any of it. Carry on.
ETA: RE Dietz, interesting re DarkOz. Maybe right. Let’s see how he posts about it.
Okay, unJon, I'll bite. Since, to paraphrase Captain Kirk to Picard, I was reading confirmation bias studies when you were in diapers. What exactly do you think I have wrong about the inimitable MDawg, leading me down the trail of wrong conclusions and rejection of meaningful information? I'm curious to hear this, since I've had interactions with him on four different forums and a handful of PMs with him, starting from the beginning. Seems to me I have considerably more data than you, and more experience dealing with these gambling narratives than you.
So I'm always ready to hear about what I got wrong from someone in an inferior position, unless you're not in an inferior position, which would be interesting on its own merits.