But it would only be Alan looking at your W-2G forms, or win/loss statements. Let him decide if it looks legit or photo-shopped.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Printable View
But it would only be Alan looking at your W-2G forms, or win/loss statements. Let him decide if it looks legit or photo-shopped.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Eddie, think. Just how do you get by the "he probably lost $100k and more" and "Singer was obviously playing with someone else's money" claims after that? These envious people don't stop, so I do.Quote:
Originally Posted by a2a3dseddie
I have a big win to report also... but unlike Rob Singer I didn't stroll into the casino with $10,000 in cash. Nope. I just had $150 of free play plus I cashed in Total Rewards reward credits and "bought" $120 of free play. So I had $270 in the machine and I was dealt a straight flush for $500 and a few hands later I drew quad jacks and quad 4s. At the "peak" I had $1350 on the meter. Then, I lost $80 playing card craps, but hit a progressive quad Aces on a 25-cent game for a pay of $211.25. I left the casino with $1226.
This was really a spontaneous trip. My son wanted to "test drive" the new "wing" he just installed on his sportscar (a "wing" is some sort of super duper spoiler he imported from Japan and supposedly is the first to arrive in the USA... he was in the auto parts business before going to work with me so he had his connections to get it) so we got on the freeway and at 9pm there is no traffic and we just kept driving to Rincon.
He also had a big win on the night. He was playing three-line 25-cent Ultimate Aces, was dealt trip aces which triggered a 7X multiplier and got the quad on one line and that paid $1,000 total. He had $60 of free play at Rincon but chose the "double up" option when he swiped his card and doubled up to $120 of free play (he could have lost half).
Photos below of the dealt straight flush, and Jacks and 4s.
But if you're willing to put up with the doubters who say the jackpots you post aren't yours why wouldn't you send a W-2G form to Alan, or help him log into one of the casinos' websites you won these big winners at. You say you always use your players card. You should be able to access and look at your win/loss statements online. That would impossible to "fake". Just show Alan. That would be definitive proof.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
LOL LOL LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Hilarious. Now why would Singer want to keep the casino name a secret? The casino itself is not going to care. Besides, they already know about the win. No, it's likely the casino name (if that's really what was there) would give away another one of Singer's lies.
1) It was nowhere near where Singer has claimed to be living or visiting which Alan could verify through IP addresses of Singer's comments. Or
2) It's back in AZ or southern NV where Singer claims to have moved away which is why he hasn't provided all those "documents" he promised a couple years ago.
3) ????
Of course, since we know nothing Singer says is trustworthy, it could be the player's club display with a name on it as someone else mentioned.
Alan, that was a good run for you and Jason. But I'm more interested in this "wing" (rear spoiler?). Can you have him e-mail me with how it works on what type of car, etc.? Thanks.
Can you please also put poor arci out of his misery by explaining the mystery of the white blotch....(although it's FUN watching him have to endure :))
Rob, I don't understand why you blocked the name of the casino? Why don't you just come out and say it? Yes, Rob sent me the photo without the blotch blocking the name of the casino. And I don't understand why it was blocked in the first place.
If Rob wants me to tell, I will tell. But I don't understand why Rob won't say it himself? There is no surprise here. Nothing dramatic. I think the only question is why was it blocked in the first place?
I explained why in an earlier post. I got this first picture in after the first attendant came over and pulled my card. I checked to see how it came out just as the commotion of a supervisor and floor people and an exec started showing up. I wanted to get another "prettier" picture of the hand, but I was told they don't like pictures being taken in their HL room. I didn't argue because I already had one. And because I was planning on publishing it on your site, it seems the right thing to do not to put up the name. It's just in case, because I expect to play there again in the future and courtesy can go a long way.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
My cousin is the boss' personal assistant. If you run into trouble let me know.
Wonderful storyQuote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
While gazing at that fantastic win of yours Rob I noticed something that seemed a little odd and I was hoping you might be able to explain it. When I looked at the image the denomination amount jumped right out at me because it just didn't seem to look quite right:
http://i58.tinypic.com/wtertl.jpg
(The original post and image can be viewed here.)
The "2" seems to be smack dab in the center, but the "5" is bulging out beyond the inner circle and the top right of the "5" seems to be even fall beyond the full circle. I can't recall ever seeing a denomination that looked like that and I have a hard time understanding how a computer generated object such as this could be so out of whack. I found a variety of other denomination images from both here and elsewhere and everything else I found fit within the size of the circle with relative ease:
http://i57.tinypic.com/2rgfh9f.jpg
It couldn't be the $25 amount because the last image above is $25 as well and it fit fine, as did the 25 cent one. But when you put them all together it is easy to spot the outlier:
http://i58.tinypic.com/2mh75eb.jpg
Any idea why that machine rendered that image so poorly?
I have another question concerning this win that you posted earlier:
http://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/attach...1&d=1390535929
I thought this image was interesting mostly because of what it, and you, didn't say. In your text that accompanied the images you didn't mention a thing about this being a progressive royal, yet with a win meter showing 6258 it clearly was. For someone who usually gives rather in-depth details about every win it was a surprising omission.
What is even more interesting to me is the fact that the top line, the one that should show the dollar amount of the progressive, is completely cut off. Even more amazing is the fact that it is nearly perfectly cropped so that top line doesn't show, something that would be nearly impossible to have happened accidentally.
You made a point of pointing out the pay table, was there any particular reason you didn't mention the progressive?
Very interesting Spock. Thank you for all of the details.
Rob do you even play deuces? I don't recall you ever mentioning it.
Even though I have sincere respect for some of the posters here, I have to say that photoshopping fake jackpots just to impress internet posters would be a gigantic, tragic waste of time for me. What's the point? Brownie points?
I also want to say that the $25 button on Rob's jackpot (real or fake) does look like an altered $2 button, yet how do you account for the $100,500 on the meter? If the original denomination was $2 you would not only have to masterfully alter the meter from $8,000 or so, but also that huge jackpot sign on the screen would have to be seamlessly altered as well. I'm not saying Rob DIDN'T fake the win (I really don't know), but that off-center '5' wouldn't be conclusive enough evidence for me, personally.
The debate is easily enough solved. Rob told Alan which casino he had been playing in when he hit the jackpot. Alan can either himself or via assigned sworn-to-secrecy-regarding-location proxy check that casino to see if those denomination machines have the offset 5 as shown by Spock. If they do, Rob hit the jackpot. If not, the claim is very questionable.
Easy peasy
I also wondered about deuces. Doesn't seem like Rob ever mentioned that game--and I'm one to believe his wins are legit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
There are some other small things people haven't noticed in the picture Rob shared. About the paytable you see a wide area of black (being the frame of this machine). On the right side in this black portion of the picture you see a white line (not straight). That's the "white pencil" you can use in microsoft paint (photo editing) to alter photographs.
Ron has been very elaborate about the casino having problems with him taking pictures in the HL area. Well, again, look closely at that black frame of the machine in that picture. On the left side you can see that the flash of the camera turned the frame of the machine into a mirror. In that mirror you can clearly see a woman that appears to be taking a picture of something else. Rather interesting....
I like this idea and this casino will not be hard to find, nor will the machine in that casino be hard to find. I would love to get in the car and drive up to see for myself but demands at work prohibit me from doing it. Rob, I don't think, should object at this point to revealing the name of the casino or allowing me to reveal it so someone here can check for us all. Frankly, the color scheme is pretty obvious -- and when I showed the photo to someone at my son's business here in LA he immediately said "oh, that's the ____ casino" because he used to live in Vegas and the color scheme is well known.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
I think if the $25 symbol appears off center to our "investigator" then much of the suspicions can be put to rest.
If I could do it myself, I would.
Regarding other observations about flashes and lines and suspicions about altering the photo -- I think we should put those aside until the one, simple look at this machine is made.
Rincon has the same model IGT machine as these and I might drive there in the next few days to look at their $25 machines to check the symbol. However, I don't think the $25 machines have been upgraded yet to these new models. The high limit room at Rincon still is mostly made up of the older slant tops. Caesars also has this new model machine but I played only at the $5 level and even though the denomination could be switched to $25 I never did switch from $5.
To be honest, I think the questions are valid, but I also think that there is an explanation that would not invalidate Rob's report about the big win. People do win big jackpots -- especially people who have big bankrolls and play at high denominations. Hitting a royal on a 25-cent machine has the same odds as hitting a royal on a $25 machine or a $100 machine, and the only difference is having the bankroll to play at the higher denominations.
It just gets more and more hilarious. The $25 symbol is obviously an edit. And, since Alan has let the cat out of the bag that this machine is in Vegas, we now know that Singer has been lying about living near Reno. Since AZ state records still put him in Scottsdale, I think another lie has just been verified. He lied about where he is living in order to avoid admitting he lied about having "documents" to support his system.
In the past Singer has also stated he NEVER plays deuces games since his system requires large bonus payouts on a regular basis.
Oh what a tangled web ...
On one level I hate to get involved in this craziness but I can't stop myself. Rob also said he would never play triple bonus that pays two for three of a kind. Got a feeling Robs out hiking or something so we probably wont hear from Him for a while.
Sorry Alan but I disagree with you about this part of your latest post:
Regarding other observations about flashes and lines and suspicions about altering the photo -- I think we should put those aside until the one, simple look at this machine is made.
Why should we put anything aside? I see what I see and you all can see the same. Rob only shouts but doesn't clarify a whole lot and he should realize he has some explaining to do when his wins are so "off the chart". That one and simple look at this machine might be harder to arrange than expected. Which casino is it, where, what's the number of the machine and who will have the opportunity to check out the machine within a couple od days? Just saying.
Vegas_lover seeing the $25 symbol is probably the easiest way to determine if the photo is authentic. The other "clues" would be more complex, don't you think?
Arc... I think Rob is allowed to travel.
I am still hoping that Rob will say here where the machine is. I cannot drive to the casino anytime soon to see for myself.
A photo of the W2g would also be helpful.
But with all of that said has anyone else looked at $25 machines lately to check the grsphics?
Agreed, at the same time, there's no reason why Rob can't explain why there's a woman in the back taking a picture while him taking a picture of a jackpot is an issue. At the same time I've taken pictures of decent hits all the time, I've even filmed bonus rounds on slot machines and guess what I've never had any problems with casino employees while doing this. And I'm not alone on this, Youtube and the internet is filled with pictures of Vegas jackpots and footage of slotmachine action. What is it all these people do differently from Rob, where they all have no problem taking pictures and Rob does.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
And his story about not wanting to reveal the name of the casino because he will probably play there again is shaky at best. No casino I know of has a problem with a gambler publishing proof of a big hit at their casino. It shows customers you can win big, playing in their casino. The only reasons, why Rob doesn't want to share the casino name, I can come up with are:
1. Somebody can check if the machine excists
2. Somebody can check what their policy is for taking pictures of jackpots
3. Somebody can simply prove his story is bogus
Those are my beliefs. But then again, as I said before, I don't believe a word Rob says.
But Rob did send me the unedited picture showing the casinos name, and therefore:Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas_lover
1. I can check if the machine exists
2. I can check what the policy is about taking photos of jackpots
3. I have the ability to see the machine, what the $25 symbol looks like, and help determine if the story is bogus
So that sorta shoots down your post, doesn't it?
I had someone look at the photo who said the photo was NOT altered. It is legit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
It looks like it's at Wynn to me, and from the reflection in the area where the credits are it looks like there is a double diamond slot machine on the opposite side of the aisle, (next to another slot that seems to have a guy with a big head but I can't figure out what game that is).
I believe there is a potential problem that has not been considered with this scheme to identify the machine and check the graphics. If it, or even a similar machine at Rincon, is found to have a denomination that falls outside the circle it would seem to show that at least that portion of the image was not altered. I'm not going to state that if that were the case it "proves" that Rob's story is 100% true as it wouldn't do that. All it would do is show that the image issue surrounding the denomination was not an issue at all.
However, lets say that when found the denomination portion looks as others do; cleanly within the lines of the circle. That won't prove anything either. Unless someone has the machine number we won't know for certain if it is the same game. Even if can be identified as being the same machine the possibility exists that it could have self-corrected in some manner, or had received a software update that altered it.
It seems to me that while this endeavor probably won't be able to prove anything substantial, the fact that it has the potential to falsely implicate someone should give people pause when considering to pursue it.
One of the oldest and most reliable tricks in the book to keep people talking about you and paying attention to you is to generate a lot of negative feelings towards you. It's a proven fact that the pain of negative experiences is 3-4 times as strong as good feelings from positive experiences, and the people who generate those painful, negative feelings tend to stick much longer in peoples' minds than those who generate positive feelings.
Personally I am rather (but not completely) indifferent as to whether Rob is millions ahead by now. Does it help me get my work done today?
Negative campaigning in politics is one of the most powerful tools out there to keep people remembering your cause. Instinctively I think Rob understands this trick.
I should add that I have previously told Alan I've always wanted to know whether Rob is telling the truth or not and it would be nice to lay the matter to rest entirely, but I generally find Rob to be more entertaining rather than disconcerting after all these years.
I have an emotional stake just for the sense of "completion" to a long Singer saga: win, lose, or draw. Sort of like wanting to see the finale of a years-long soap opera full of plot twists & turns...
(Puts more popcorn on the grocery list.)
Curiously, a few years ago at www.lvadvice.com, someone claiming to be a Singer disciple -- and who wrote a lot like Rob -- posted a photo of a royal jackpot. I honestly don't remember the name and am not going to research it. Anyway, they claimed to have won the jackpot in one casino, but analysis demonstrated that the photo was taken at the Wynn. The lying poster was then banned. It's just strange that the Wynn is the locale -- and in both instances the person taking the photo was "supposed to be" elsewhere.
Rob gave me a perfectly logical explanation why he was at the casino/hotel where the $100K jackpot was hit. It's no big deal why he was there. The man is free to travel around and he certainly had a good reason to be there on that particular date. So I wish this part of the "controversy" was not discussed anymore.
Last night, someone familiar with the new machines told me that that the denomination falls outside of the "circle" on the new model. Of course, I don't know if the machine in the photo is the new model. But he looked at the photo and felt the photo was not altered.
The acid test here would be to go to the casino and look at the machine. I happen to know that the casino in question does not have many of these machines, so it would be rather simple for someone to go... look... and report back.
I personally am itching to get in the car and drive there and look for myself, but I just have too much work to do here.
The rest of the photo -- and I have the original, unaltered photo sent to me -- also looks legitimate.
I am keeping an open mind just in case someone does go to the casino and finds that the $25 symbol is not what it is supposed to be in the photo.
Just to be 100% clear here -- No photography expert examined the photo, correct? I think the most common interpretation of your early post was that someone with a background in photographic alteration had examined it, but that is not the case. Do I have that right? Are you a photography expert? I ask because "It is legit" -- last I checked -- is a declarative statement.
I was a photographer in my youth, but those skills are useless here as I was pre-digital. I developed my own photos and all that, but figuring out what's altered these days takes modern skills.
It was NOT an expert but someone familiar with the machine displays. His feeling was that everything looked correct. Still someone needs to look.
I particularly love the claim that the $25 identification has been "altered". Then, how it's believed that I, at my age and lifestyle, would bother with or even know how to alter pictures. We're going to the Lone Eagle Grill at the Hyatt in Incline Village tomorrow night and we're taking four friends. Let's hope they accept phantom bucks too :)
OMG---there certainly IS pain! I won that bet too....what a HOT STREAK!!
I'm watching a rerun of Marvel's Agents of SHIELD tonight on the computer. Obviously Rob is a far more expert gambler than me.
I'm also trying to figure out why Rob hasn't mentioned the Gaming Today issues. Oh yeah, GT is monitoring this forum -- that might have something to do with it.
Red, there's some things I'm just not interested in. I'm definitely a "more expert gambler" than you (and everyone else, obviously) when it comes to video poker. But please be assured, you are #1 in my book when it comes to anonymous consulting for anonymous sports bettors in anonymous situations.
I have no idea why Eileen from Gaming Today would lie about Rob. Must have something to do with his schlong.
This shlong thing is gonna require pictures or video, and some proof that his length and/or girth have not been altered in any way.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
On second thought, I'll take your word. Please no video.
Forgive me: but isn't "size" something akin to "expected return" from a good paytable, but it's more about the "special plays" that can turn a low expected return into a jackpot?
I was always told it's how you use it.:cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
IIRC, Singer claimed he used "it" to hurt his partners.Quote:
Originally Posted by slingshot
Here's another great win, especially for our happy camper Bubba
That Olympic symbol doesn't appear to line up correctly, and the entire background image seems to be fake. The heads and names appear to be men, yet they are holding flowers so I suspect the original image was of women. In the reflection you can clearly see a polar bear feasting on a penguin, and I don't think I have to tell any of you what that means do I?
Without a doubt that image was forged, and it was actually Jamaican women who won the men's 5000M speed skating as shown in this unaltered image:
http://nazret.com/blog/media/blogs/pict/1399296_M01.jpg
What did these three sissies win--a 5000 Minute Justin Bieber babysitting marathon?Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas_lover
Whahahaha what a poor attempt. This one really is too funny to be insulting. You're losing your touch Bubba, go fetch yourself some beers and give it another try in a couple of hours.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
@Spock, Great reply. That's humor the way it's supposed to be! Cheers :)
More to be proud of VL. Ireen Wust, right out of the euro-lesbian factory. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas_lover
Do you guys have any non girly-man athletes?
Oh the envy, oh the envy Bubba. Yes another gold medal for The Netherlands. And just to inform your poor, limited brain: Ireen Wust isn't a lesbian, she's bi-sexual and it has absolutely nothing to do with her gold medal. Poor boy, you try to insult people but at the same time you look like a complete moron. Keep up the good work! I'm out. Got better things to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Haha! BISEXUAL!! Absolutely understandable....for a freak who looks like both a guy and a girl :) What PRIDE the great population of Adrians and Martins and Svens must be feeling!Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas_lover
Anyway, I'll give you the last word just as I gave that idiot Spock the last gasp effort to keep making a jealous fool out of himself. We're headed up to Zephyr Cove in Tahoe for the next 3 days for some skiing and snowmobiling. It's just a taste of the many things people can do with $100,000 to spend:) Now don't forget to set your alarm so you can wake up in time in the morning to get to that "family business"!!!
Tata.
The Olympics coverage on this forum should be stellar.
Well, because of my recent big win at another Harrahs property and just as I predicted, I received a slew of offers already. One of them was a free flight for two to Harrahs in New Orleans! We just returned and I couldn't WAIT to show everyone the good news (again)! Another two sessions of five-level, $1 thru $25 ARTT. First session, a loss of $9445; Second session, a profit of $41,265. And for those mathematically challenged (or for those psychologically agitated :)) that's a cool +$31,820!!
What's that you're saying Eddie? (of course, with the usual hint of sour grapes): Congratulations to the greatest vp player EVER? Or are your hands shaking again as you make another failed attempt at story-telling about me?
How's that Spock--you're STILL trying to concoct stupid conspiracy theories about my ability to create jackpot pictures out of thin air? Then here's a cure: get a decent paying job, go to LV instead of just dreaming about it, and find a high-limit machine or two to sit at and play for a change, while looking at the $25 denom. identifiers and see how often they just aren't spot-on centered. You will finally be enlightened and set free.
OK redietz, let's hear how Harrahs will come down on me for showing others that their -EV games can be beaten! Then include an explanation of how that could possibly be when people become SO jealous over my ability to win consistently (and very largely so, recently) that they end up stupefied at the very thought of it.
And VL, my newest friend and biggest fan....I know seeing these jackpots is like driving a stake thru your heart when you have to view a single win that's more than a working year's worth of Euros to you, but heed the word: YOU TOO can be as successful as me, but you just have to get to the states more often, again, instead of just dreaming about it by using that sappy handle of yours :)
Yes, the P-A-I-N is about to begin again!
How funny your latest report about winning a big price is only filled with hatred. I do feel sorry for you. Especiialy since you think to know anything about my income. Very funny indeed. You know nothing about me but at the same time you're completely "in the dark" with your assumptions. But please continue to enjoy your life in fantasy land. Oh and since you hadn't noticed yet I'll repeat it again, I don't believe ANY of your claims so to me this jackpot is just another one of your "fata morgana's".Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Rob, I don't mind you playing Deuces Wild, as it's my game, too, but for the love of God, how many times must I request that you put your schlong in the picture so we know it's really you?
Hey Rob.
You truly are the dingleberry in the assholes of life. I can't figure out your angle yet. But you are nothing more than a low level con artist. I have no intention nor time to debate your shortcomings. But let it be known that your picture appears right next to the word sociopath in Webster's.
Well there you have it....P-A-I-N rearing it's ugly face once again in the form of more hatred and envy :) and to my ultimate delight, of course! Except for red. I know what he's itchin' to see, and it's outta love, not hate.
He VL, you better cool it. Rob's the big time celebrity here and if you aren't a little more respectful he's gonna write a whole lot of nasty things about you in Gaming Today.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas_lover
Can't wait to read that article! It will probably be very entertaining. Another "village idiot in action" special edition :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Spock
Come on Rob, you can do better than your latest reply. Put some effort into your insults, they seriously lack originality. Playing that same broken record is getting so boring. Try something new, surprise us, please? I know you can do it boy, don't make me lose confidence in you :)
I would just like to point out that the $25 symbol appears as the other did in the first controversial photo, with the denomination over what could be considered the "border line" of the graphic. Also note that this was at a different casino (a Caesars property) and so it appears that this new photo confirms that the previous $25 photo was not doctored.
I guess Rob was not playing with a players card at either casino? The photo at the first casino showed the players card slot was "red" meaning no players card was inserted. And the screen on the Caesars/Harrahs machine also shows no players card was inserted.
By the way, had the slot attendant inserted his card the photos would appear differently.
So Rob, were you playing $25 machines without players cards? Why? I realize you're very rich to be able to play $25 machines in the first place, but why sacrifice so much in comps and freebies because you didn't have a card inserted?
Now now Alan, the fact that the $25 symbol appears to be the same does not imply that the previous photo wasn't altered. There are many ways to alter a picture. Rob's players card probably wasn't in the machine because when the slot attendant comes for the handpay, the slot attendant removes the players club card. But hey, that brings us to another question. If the slot attendant was already there, how come Rob didn't run into any problems this time taking that jackpot picture???? Oeps....Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Not a correct assumption Alan. Hit one of these babies and you'll understand. Unlike hits below $50,000, the initial attendant pulls your player's card (which again, I ALWAYS use) and calls a supervisory verifier first. He stays with you until the verification process is complete. After it's verified he inserts his card for the payout portion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
On a side note, dante's "inferno of hate & pain" needs to be augmented by the fact that it would behoove him etc. to take notice how I snapped two photos of the winning hand this time so the conspiracy theorists could compare reality, and a nod to the NO Harrahs high limit area for not complaining about photos.
Gimme five!
My...exactly how deep have I gotten under your skin! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Singer 0, Everyone else on this board 50,000
Explain why anyone would be jealous or envious of you posting photo-shopped pictures and jackpots other people have won?
You disappear for less than 48 hours and return with another story and another picture of a $50,000 win, on a game you claim you never play. Riiiight...
Since your last post 2 days ago:
Alan has agreed to post his W-2Gs if you would do the same. Your answer?
I have agreed to send Alan my most recent tax returns if you did the same. Your answer?
Alan and redietz have offered to meet you in Las Vegas to examine the "proof" you claim to now have. Your answer?
arcimede$ has said to send him the "proof" and he would post it here. Your answer?
arcimede$ said his tax forms are standing by and ready to go if you also send yours. Your answer?
You never did deny my heinous insinuation that you sexually abused your children. Since you expect everyone here to believe anything you say just because...well just because you said it I think I'll give it another try.
Rob Singer lives in an RV because that way the FBI can't pinpoint and arrest him for all the kiddie porn he has on his computer. Between the thousands of posts across multiple forums and his fixation with his "schlong" what else could he be doing?
Alan posted earlier that winning at VP is nothing to be jealous or envious about. I doubt you were ever a winning player. You are however, a homophobic, racist, chauvinistic, cheap, gambling addicted compulsive liar. You have contributed absolutely nothing to the human race throughout your pitiful existence. No wait...I'm wrong. Long after you're gone and "eating dirt" as you like to say, all your insults and ridiculous claims will remain on these message boards for all to see. I'm sure people will still be having a good laugh at all your antics and ridiculous claims!
So keep it up Rob!
Rob, do you think you're the first player to hit a jackpot that requires a handpay and a supervisor to confirm? No one has ever pulled my card out of a machine until the floor person or supervisor is ready to insert their card immediately. This is SOP so that cards do not get misplaced and a card is always in the machine or around the neck of the floor person or supervisor so cards don't get lost.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Frankly I'd still like to know how long you were playing, or how many hands you played, at the $25 denomination before hitting?
Let's be generous and say you had $8,000 of your original $10,000 bankroll when you reached the $25 denomination (allowing for soft wins along the way) -- that gave you approximately 64 plays at $125 per push of the button (plus smaller wins along the way). We'll estimate those smaller wins coming at a 100% rate which would double your 64 plays to 128 plays.
And since you still had 10 plays left in credits on the machine... that means you hit this big winner in no more than about 118 plays once you sat down? If playing ten hands per minute (one every 6 seconds which is "slow") you hit this big win in less than 12 minutes from the time you got in the chair?
Wonders never cease.
Good question.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas_lover
Rob drove to New Orleans? Or does NO Harrah's mean something else?
I don't know if within the last 2 weeks or so Rob could have driven to Lake Tahoe, Tunica, Las Vegas and New Orleans, but hey in his world anything is possible. I'd drive to all those places too if I was hitting all those $50, 000 & $100, 000 winners within minutes and at the highest denomination when I only had a few credits left.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
What never ceases to wonder is how you still don't read with comprehension and let others steer you into their dens of pure envy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
This wasn't the same casino where I hit the last one. You know that. What I was told there by the suit about snapping pictures has nothing to do with Harrahs New Orleans policy. I took two pics of this win to thwart conspiracy theories by the envious. It did it's job, but they can't ever admit it.
I'm the only one here who has hit and posted pictures of $50k & greater vp wins. I've also had many other five figure jackpots over the years. The $50k and higher jackpots are always verified by a supervisor before the attendant inserts his card to begin the payout routine. See the "verification required" across the screen? The attendant pulls your card, waits for the supervisor to verify, then the attendant inserts his card and takes off to do his thing. When you hit a $35k or $20k jackpot, it's treated just like any other handpay: the slot attendant comes, removes your card, inserts his, etc. So try to get it and stop all the nonsense about what happens when smaller jackpots are hit.
Your estimates of hands and times and whatever other baloney you're chasing your tail with, probably to appease the clowns, is irrelevant. I play slowly because I'm not in a hurry to pile up the points or get comps. I don't care about those meaningless stats, but I can tell you from a quick glance that your guesses make no sense.
Let the pain continue!
What a dummy. Your reading comprehension is the worst here. Tunica was several months ago, we're staying nearby Lake Tahoe, we flew a back-and-forth to LV to visit our daughter who was on business there, and we flew to New Orleans for a 2-night stay. And guess what? That's what WINNING MONEY allows you to do. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by a2a3dseddie
Now go back to your corner and feel even more stupid.
I love the vp info, but more importantly, is the Den of Pure Envy still across the street from The Green Door or have they relocated? I've toured The Green Door but never got a peek in The Den of Pure Envy. Are there a lot of topless den mothers? They must really do some kinky stuff there.
Rob please don't insult me by trying to tell me the procedure for a handpay differs bewtween $1200 and $100k.
Ooh... how much exactly have I gotten under your skin...:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Rob Singer (admitted tax cheat) 0 Everyone else on this forum 50, 002
"Visit" your daughter huh? Haven't you harmed her enough already? Oh no...don't tell me your years of emotional and sexual abuse drove her into a life of prostitution in Las Vegas...you are pure evil.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
She probably works a double -- day shift in The Den of Pure Envy and nights at The Green Door.
The angrier you become at Rob, the more wins he will enjoy. Which could make you angrier, which will give him more wins, then more anger, then more wins....A vicious upward spiral (feedback loop) that will send Rob straight to the Forbes 400 list.
Who's angry? This is fun! This "chipping away" process is great! I hope Rob continues to imagine winning all the money in the world!Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Room
Now everyone is joining in on the fun!
Rob Singer (Admitted Homophobe) 0 Everyone else on this forum 50, 003
Hey Rob, temporary truce... I know you don't think much of anyone but youself, but here's some advice. Why don't you just post a picture of a winning $500 million dollar Powerball Lottery ticket and pass it off as your own? I'd bet you'd get Bill Gates to be envious even! Then you can describe how you didn't even have to pay any taxes on 1/2 billion dollars because you could write off your "Lucky Charms" cereal and toilet paper!
I hope eddie's right. Maybe Rob can invite his daughter to the data meet.
:D That's the spirit redietz!Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Leave my wife out of this red!! Besides, she has to work the double shift to support my VP lossesQuote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Oh my oh my, I see the Rob Singer fanclub is growing by the day. His fame also seems to have the same effect on him as it did on Justin Bieber. Too bad Rob can't actually be deported.....................to North Korea. They'd probably find a pretty effective way to clean up his act over there. Damm Asians :)
Ah well, back to collecting coupons to feed my poor family.
You're the IRS son in law that Rob has wrote about? The plot thickens... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by regnis
I haven't ever hit a 50K jackpot myself, but I have some acquaintances who did. Would a slot and vp jackpot protocol be the same in terms of verification and inserting cards and all that?
I'm sure 50K jackpots are rare enough in Harrah's NO that publicity photos are taken and plastered on the wall somewhere. Maybe someone can find Rob's smiling face and verify the jackpot. But Rob never mentions this stuff. You know, most casinos take photos of their big winners -- I guess Rob may be publicity shy. I don't blame him. Between the jackpots and his rep, he probably has groupies.
Wrong redietz, Rob doesn't mention this stuff because one would think that anyone who plays vp or slots knows that when sizeable jackpots are hit in most larger casinos (and all jackpots in most smaller ones) they ASK you for permission to take a photo. That's a touristy thing, and I'm no tourist. I've explained the $50k and above protocol I've experienced, but it's apparently not everywhere because they didn't follow it in Tunica. It appears to be only when the big notification pops up saying "verification required" and the only other time I've seen that was when I hit a $100,000 royal at Bellagio.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Finally, for those who can't get over being sore that I hit these things, close your eyes, think about something else for a while, and that awful feeling will pass. Of course, I tingle over the thought of it all, but I might hit something else in the future that will land that pit right back into your stomachs, andyou all have my permission to keep on trying to create reasons why these just can't be :)
Hey Rob, after Alan banned you for a few weeks, what did you do with your time besides pull your pud in the back of your trailer? Then, in a fit of desperation coupled with loneliness you e-mail him some fairy tale of how you hit a $50K jackpot in a pathetic attempt to get back onto the forum to interact with someone...anyone...Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
After all your ridiculous assertions, theories, and "special plays" were mercifully dismissed by anyone here with 2 working brain cells, you come back on trying to claim you are the luckiest man in the casino. Priceless!
Rob Singer (Desperate Attention Whore) 0 Rest of the forum 50,006