He doesn't have shit!
Printable View
He doesn't have shit!
Yes, I'd have to give this round to KJ: well played, grasshopper.
Robert, time to sharpen your game.
Oh, and Robert: you wrote that " I was given his name, address etc. agreeing not to publicly release any of it" by law enforcement.
But then I recalled that by report you were once involved in the intelligance arena yourself; that being so, did you get the instructions not to disclose his name from The Chief via shoe phone or while in the Cone of Silence?
Was your shoe phone also used to transmit the instructions from Resorts World not to release their name when you won $1.5 on one VP pull?
Was Agent 99 also sworn to silence?
Gosh, so many NDA's, and so little worth disclosing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hgq4w4dqKsUQuote:
Originally Posted by monet
Do I have your permission to post your real name?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I'm sure you guys have seen King of the Hill?
Dale Gribble aka Rob Singer...
Sorry Rob, I had too. I saw an uncanny resemblance.
Wow. Dale ? That is incredible.
One thing that I find weird about the Newell pics is Rob's facial expression. For a guy trying to rile people up and have a good laugh he sure looks serious.
Maybe he really expected people to believe ...
Good stuff! Can you also do one of Manboy Rusty Shackleford ?Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveVarianceI'm sure you guys have seen King of the Hill?
Dale Gribble aka Rob Singer...
Sorry Rob, I had too. I saw an uncanny resemblance.
Poker Fag Alert rejects.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
Pussytive Vaginance & Oz zees jb from behind the trash can.
Yellow belly, are you defending Manboy Rusty Shackleford? Didn't he give you the door prize from his precious house? Two questions for you to answer. First post in ages, where you don't ask a question. Still a useless troll maggot. That will never change. Not even comical, completely void of any worth whatsoever!Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyPoker Fag Alert rejects.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
Pussytive Vaginance & Oz zees jb from behind the trash can.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyGood stuff! Can you also do one of Manboy Rusty Shackleford ?Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveVarianceI'm sure you guys have seen King of the Hill?
Dale Gribble aka Rob Singer...
Sorry Rob, I had too. I saw an uncanny resemblance.
Funny stuff.
My first thought was actually a sucked up decrepit Joe Biden.
But this is good....
Or this...
I'll give Rob credit that he's not a disgusting, chain smoker like Gribble is.Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveVarianceI'm sure you guys have seen King of the Hill?
Dale Gribble aka Rob Singer...
Sorry Rob, I had too. I saw an uncanny resemblance.
Get your worthless ass back behind the trash can where you belong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
Poker Fag Alert, jb...Oz zees you hole-carding again.
Smallcap is still around he post's on Discord quite regularly, definitely not dead lol
Smallcap is still around he post's on Discord quite regularly, definitely not dead lolQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJNot unless this was very recently and news hasn't really broke. He has changed his handle on forums and is posting as GOAT, which he posted under fairly recently.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Good to hear.Quote:
Originally Posted by SplitEm
How funny, Joe Biden was EXACTLY the first person I thought of as well!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Finkle
Since Singer is a big fan of Biden, I thought I would use Gribbles instead.
Bidens fell a few days ago...
Yes, this is the same man that is leading our Great Nation, and now wants to lead four more years! Scary!
I'm not sure what is scarier, this or God forbid someone happen to Joe and Mrs. Harris takes over! Scary!
I am Republican, Conservative - But definitely NOT Far Right. Right of Center.
So are most here, except for Comrade Dietz, RINO kew and AIQ. Almost forgot libertarians V and Marathon Mission. Then you have cool guys Monet and jb, that are clearly right wing, but will firmly tell you they have no stance either way:) Last but not least AlexWolf the Centrist:)Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveVarianceHow funny, Joe Biden was EXACTLY the first person I thought of as well!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Finkle
Since Singer is a big fan of Biden, I thought I would use Gribbles instead.
Bidens fell a few days ago...
Yes, this is the same man that is leading our Great Nation, and now wants to lead four more years! Scary!
I'm not sure what is scarier, this or God forbid someone happen to Joe and Mrs. Harris takes over! Scary!
I am Republican, Conservative - But definitely NOT Far Right. Right of Center.
Believing in global warming and completely despising Trump are not mutually exclusive with being conservative.Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzySo are most here, except for Comrade Dietz, RINO kew and AIQ. Almost forgot libertarians V and Marathon Mission. Then you have cool guys Monet and jb, that are clearly right wing, but will firmly tell you they have no stance either way:) Last but not least AlexWolf the Centrist:)Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveVarianceHow funny, Joe Biden was EXACTLY the first person I thought of as well!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Finkle
Since Singer is a big fan of Biden, I thought I would use Gribbles instead.
Bidens fell a few days ago...
Yes, this is the same man that is leading our Great Nation, and now wants to lead four more years! Scary!
I'm not sure what is scarier, this or God forbid someone happen to Joe and Mrs. Harris takes over! Scary!
I am Republican, Conservative - But definitely NOT Far Right. Right of Center.
While true I am not a Republican, I have had a discussion with my closer friends who believe I am conservative. Given global warming is by far the biggest issue - I tend to side with Democrats because Republicans seem to largely deny it is a significant issue. They will see...
For instance I've tried to open up a discussion on gun collections but no one has any interest. I suspect mine would surpass the vast majority on here and very few are hunting rifles/hand-guns.
I am fairly libertarian but I just believe in environmental regulation because often it is taking from future generations in a severe way. Those whose interests are not able to be represented.
As far as Biden, I despise him to a large degree but despise the Democrat party even more for the rigged bullshit. Hillary and now Biden. I would not be surprised if an old constantly stumbling man with cognitive issues doesn't bring out enough voters to take the Presidency. If that happens, I'd love to tell those mother fuckers how awful they are and if someone else hung them from a tree I can't say I'd care. (Democratic leadership)
In 3 years I wouldn't be surprised if we see Secret Service walking around 1 foot away from Biden to catch him when he falls. 20% he breaks a bone if re-elected.
Overall, I generally stay away from politics. Generally on the most controversial issues, I tend to leam Conservative. Then there are a lot of issues I dont have a strong opinion on either way, primarily because I am not interested in taking the time to do the research that is needed. For example, Global Warming, I just don't know enough about it to take a hard stance. I feel someone would have to put in at least 20 hours of research to form a good opinion about it, probably far more --which I am not willing to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionBelieving in global warming and completely despising Trump are not mutually exclusive with being conservative.Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzySo are most here, except for Comrade Dietz, RINO kew and AIQ. Almost forgot libertarians V and Marathon Mission. Then you have cool guys Monet and jb, that are clearly right wing, but will firmly tell you they have no stance either way:) Last but not least AlexWolf the Centrist:)Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveVariance
How funny, Joe Biden was EXACTLY the first person I thought of as well!
Since Singer is a big fan of Biden, I thought I would use Gribbles instead.
Bidens fell a few days ago...
Yes, this is the same man that is leading our Great Nation, and now wants to lead four more years! Scary!
I'm not sure what is scarier, this or God forbid someone happen to Joe and Mrs. Harris takes over! Scary!
I am Republican, Conservative - But definitely NOT Far Right. Right of Center.
While true I am not a Republican, I have had a discussion with my closer friends who believe I am conservative. Given global warming is by far the biggest issue - I tend to side with Democrats because Republicans seem to largely deny it is a significant issue. They will see...
For instance I've tried to open up a discussion on gun collections but no one has any interest. I suspect mine would surpass the vast majority on here and very few are hunting rifles/hand-guns.
I am fairly libertarian but I just believe in environmental regulation because often it is taking from future generations in a severe way. Those whose interests are not able to be represented.
As far as Biden, I despise him to a large degree but despise the Democrat party even more for the rigged bullshit. Hillary and now Biden. I would not be surprised if an old constantly stumbling man with cognitive issues doesn't bring out enough voters to take the Presidency. If that happens, I'd love to tell those mother fuckers how awful they are and if someone else hung them from a tree I can't say I'd care. (Democratic leadership)
In 3 years I wouldn't be surprised if we see Secret Service walking around 1 foot away from Biden to catch him when he falls. 20% he breaks a bone if re-elected.
Something like the death penality, I believe around 80% of Republicans are for it. I am STRONGLY against it. I feel no man, or jury has the right to kill another man. Besides, it's more painfull to sit behind bars on Death Row for the rest of your life. If they are in general population, it's not so bad. I would possibly change my opinion if there was a way that we could determine guilt of death penality cases with 100% certainty (The kind of certainty we have against Singers $1.5 Million VP claim (•‿•)) Even if 1 out of 10,000 is wrongly convicted in a DP case, that isnt acceptable. Almost 200 former Death Roe inmates have been set free. Without technology, they would have been cooked, jabbed, or shot, depending on your states method to end their life.
What is funny is probably 75% of my friends or close associates are Democrats/Liberal. None of the people I hang out with have really strong political beliefs, because it bores me and I won't hang out with them if the bulk of their conversation is politics.
You can read from people who have studied global warming for 20 years. You can find many people who have done this. I was very aware of it 20 years ago as many were. Now you can believe it is all political but that is absurd. One side you have a 99% of successful scientists agreeing with and other 1% you have Youtube quacks.(made up #s but probably not that far off these days) I don't think they're all grifters some genuinely believe their nonsense. Take any scientific position that impacts society and you'll find someone with their biases against it. Those who strongly identify with independence tend to follow those types. You know, the rebels!Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveVariance
Not sure what to make of the death penalty. Lots of hard right people not for it because they don't like the state having that much power. I agree with your stance.
The problem with politics is most people who are strongly on one-side identify so strongly they have to defend every little thing with whataboutisms. They're unable to take the criticism like they should. Simpletons.
Whatabout whataboutism? That's the problem with criticizing whataboutism. Whatabout whataboutism is a....wait for it....whataboutism.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
The problem is if you use whataboutism you can justify anything. It basically just continually lowers the bar. It is the sort of thinking that makes corruption endemic to a society.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmWhatabout whataboutism? That's the problem with criticizing whataboutism. Whatabout whataboutism is a....wait for it....whataboutism.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
You could literally give me anything and I can give you whataboutism.
Trump takes classified documents that he was entitled to declassify and take.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionThe problem is if you use whataboutism you can justify anything. It basically just continually lowers the bar. It is the sort of thinking that makes corruption endemic to a society.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmWhatabout whataboutism? That's the problem with criticizing whataboutism. Whatabout whataboutism is a....wait for it....whataboutism.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
You could literally give me anything and I can give you whataboutism.
Biden stole classified documents he could not lawfully remove from Capitol Hill and kept them for years.
Trump gets charged but Biden doesn't.
So if anyone says, "hey Trump got charged but what about Biden? Biden should have been charged."
You think it is wrong to say "What about Biden?"
There is a thing in the constitution about equal protection under the law. It is all about whataboutism.
I was trying to figure out why you brought this back to Trump. I specifically tried to leave that out of it. I really don't care about the fucker since he is no longer President.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmTrump takes classified documents that he was entitled to declassify and take.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionThe problem is if you use whataboutism you can justify anything. It basically just continually lowers the bar. It is the sort of thinking that makes corruption endemic to a society.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
You could literally give me anything and I can give you whataboutism.
Biden stole classified documents he could not lawfully remove from Capitol Hill and kept them for years.
Trump gets charged but Biden doesn't.
So if anyone says, "hey Trump got charged but what about Biden? Biden should have been charged."
You think it is wrong to say "What about Biden?"
There is a thing in the constitution about equal protection under the law. It is all about whataboutism.
but I had to ask ... "Why is Mickey so obsessed he brings Trump back up?"
Then I realized I had used a term recently made popular in use against right-wingers. Previously I called it the 'grand excuse' or maybe 'golden excuse' but then I started to see whataboutism being widely used so I started using that term. Makes sense, no?
But then one might ask, why did this come to be a thing during Trump's years?
It must be the fact you have such a rotten sleazeball president but you also have the strongest sense of fandom/manlove ever seen in my lifetime. When you take people sooo attached to a man who has done so many sleazy things .. they're going to have to justify themselves. The more sleazy the person the more they have to do this.
Wallah! whataboutism. aka golden excuse.
Once again you have to resort to insults because you don't have a cogent argument. Trump/Biden is just the most obvious example right now, the only reason I used it is everybody knows about it. No explaining needed.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI was trying to figure out why you brought this back to Trump. I specifically tried to leave that out of it. I really don't care about the fucker since he is no longer President.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmTrump takes classified documents that he was entitled to declassify and take.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Biden stole classified documents he could not lawfully remove from Capitol Hill and kept them for years.
Trump gets charged but Biden doesn't.
So if anyone says, "hey Trump got charged but what about Biden? Biden should have been charged."
You think it is wrong to say "What about Biden?"
There is a thing in the constitution about equal protection under the law. It is all about whataboutism.
but I had to ask ... "Why is Mickey so obsessed he brings Trump back up?"
Then I realized I had used a term recently made popular in use against right-wingers. Previously I called it the 'grand excuse' or maybe 'golden excuse' but then I started to see whataboutism being widely used so I started using that term. Makes sense, no?
But then one might ask, why did this come to be a thing during Trump's years?
It must be the fact you have such a rotten sleazeball president but you also have the strongest sense of fandom/manlove ever seen in my lifetime. When you take people sooo attached to a man who has done so many sleazy things .. they're going to have to justify themselves. The more sleazy the person the more they have to do this.
Wallah! whataboutism. aka golden excuse.
Those who criticize whataboutisms are saying "whatabout whataboutisms?" You are doing it yourselves. You are either to stupid to know it or you are a hypocrite.
Those who criticize whataboutisms want their cake and eat it to. They are justifying double standards. They don't want their double standards being exposed. So they bash whataboutisms. Like that will win an argument. No chance.
And since you want to insult me about my Trump support, just so you know, two can play that game, climatard.
And whoever you support for president. It will be because of your manlove for him, climatard.
AQ, people who support Trump only do so because he isn't a politician and he came into office as a clever businessman who got many important things done to help our country. He will eventually go down as one of our greatest achievers as president, if he isn't already. No one REALLY cares if he's "sleazy" in his personal life, just as the democrats never cared about the slimeball things Kennedy or Clinton did. They all served this country well. And people realize that. The US is currently being "led" by a doddling old fool who is a sore thumb on our world stage, even if he and his administration are being silently controlled by Obama and his team.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI was trying to figure out why you brought this back to Trump. I specifically tried to leave that out of it. I really don't care about the fucker since he is no longer President.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmTrump takes classified documents that he was entitled to declassify and take.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Biden stole classified documents he could not lawfully remove from Capitol Hill and kept them for years.
Trump gets charged but Biden doesn't.
So if anyone says, "hey Trump got charged but what about Biden? Biden should have been charged."
You think it is wrong to say "What about Biden?"
There is a thing in the constitution about equal protection under the law. It is all about whataboutism.
but I had to ask ... "Why is Mickey so obsessed he brings Trump back up?"
Then I realized I had used a term recently made popular in use against right-wingers. Previously I called it the 'grand excuse' or maybe 'golden excuse' but then I started to see whataboutism being widely used so I started using that term. Makes sense, no?
But then one might ask, why did this come to be a thing during Trump's years?
It must be the fact you have such a rotten sleazeball president but you also have the strongest sense of fandom/manlove ever seen in my lifetime. When you take people sooo attached to a man who has done so many sleazy things .. they're going to have to justify themselves. The more sleazy the person the more they have to do this.
Wallah! whataboutism. aka golden excuse.
Trump is under unfair politically motivated indictments just as Netanyahu was. He got re-elected because people saw thru the smoke. Let's hope Trump does so we can watch our country climb back onto its feet without constantly being laughed at by China.
Both Trump and Biden are simply too fucking old.
Time for new guys.
Rob, you would love to see you're buddy Barrack Osama back as president. Remember the good old days when you spoke so highly of him at Rusty's house ? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerAQ, people who support Trump only do so because he isn't a politician and he came into office as a clever businessman who got many important things done to help our country. He will eventually go down as one of our greatest achievers as president, if he isn't already. No one REALLY cares if he's "sleazy" in his personal life, just as the democrats never cared about the slimeball things Kennedy or Clinton did. They all served this country well. And people realize that. The US is currently being "led" by a doddling old fool who is a sore thumb on our world stage, even if he and his administration are being silently controlled by Obama and his team.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI was trying to figure out why you brought this back to Trump. I specifically tried to leave that out of it. I really don't care about the fucker since he is no longer President.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
but I had to ask ... "Why is Mickey so obsessed he brings Trump back up?"
Then I realized I had used a term recently made popular in use against right-wingers. Previously I called it the 'grand excuse' or maybe 'golden excuse' but then I started to see whataboutism being widely used so I started using that term. Makes sense, no?
But then one might ask, why did this come to be a thing during Trump's years?
It must be the fact you have such a rotten sleazeball president but you also have the strongest sense of fandom/manlove ever seen in my lifetime. When you take people sooo attached to a man who has done so many sleazy things .. they're going to have to justify themselves. The more sleazy the person the more they have to do this.
Wallah! whataboutism. aka golden excuse.
Trump is under unfair politically motivated indictments just as Netanyahu was. He got re-elected because people saw thru the smoke. Let's hope Trump does so we can watch our country climb back onto its feet without constantly being laughed at by China.
On the political scale, I’m about where I was growing up. Right-center to where most Democrats were.
Now that everything has shifted so far left, being the same person, I have fallen off the scale to the right. Someone by today’s standards who should be ostracized, cancelled and stripped of free speech. (Not that it exists anymore)
People love Trump far beyond what anyone should for a politician. He stood for nothing but bullshit. I'm not sure where the "insults" were. You want to act like whataboutism (or whatever you wish to call it) isn't a thing... when it clearly is. It didn't start with Trump. Just the situation around Trump really brought it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmOnce again you have to resort to insults because you don't have a cogent argument. Trump/Biden is just the most obvious example right now, the only reason I used it is everybody knows about it. No explaining needed.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI was trying to figure out why you brought this back to Trump. I specifically tried to leave that out of it. I really don't care about the fucker since he is no longer President.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
but I had to ask ... "Why is Mickey so obsessed he brings Trump back up?"
Then I realized I had used a term recently made popular in use against right-wingers. Previously I called it the 'grand excuse' or maybe 'golden excuse' but then I started to see whataboutism being widely used so I started using that term. Makes sense, no?
But then one might ask, why did this come to be a thing during Trump's years?
It must be the fact you have such a rotten sleazeball president but you also have the strongest sense of fandom/manlove ever seen in my lifetime. When you take people sooo attached to a man who has done so many sleazy things .. they're going to have to justify themselves. The more sleazy the person the more they have to do this.
Wallah! whataboutism. aka golden excuse.
Those who criticize whataboutisms are saying "whatabout whataboutisms?" You are doing it yourselves. You are either to stupid to know it or you are a hypocrite.
Those who criticize whataboutisms want their cake and eat it to. They are justifying double standards. They don't want their double standards being exposed. So they bash whataboutisms. Like that will win an argument. No chance.
And since you want to insult me about my Trump support, just so you know, two can play that game, climatard.
And whoever you support for president. It will be because of your manlove for him, climatard.
Your argument doesn't make much sense to me and I'll leave it at that. Double standards being exposed and such. I have no clue about the details of Trump or Biden or Hillary or Obama in regards to document handling. I thought GWB was accused of this at one point but cursory google search came up empty. These situations are never equal. After doing a search I did come across this which is LOL. Trump has no shame but I don't care to argue about it anymore. If you haven't wised up about the nature of that man then you never will.
Trump is on a whole new level. Zero shits given about the truth. Now if the next guy is even shitier we'll be hearing "but what about Trump??". Lol screw that. Stand for something.Quote:
At a GOP campaign rally on Sunday in Arizona, former President Donald Trump took the opportunity to defend keeping classified documents by accusing past presidents of doing the same.
Trump said many other presidents stored millions of pages of documents in warehouses, "some of them without front doors that worked."
His speech erroneously claimed former President Barack Obama moved over 33 million pages of documents to a former furniture store in Chicago. The National Archives previously debunked this claim, saying they transported 30 million unclassified documents to a secure federal facility in Chicago.
Not going to comment on the climatard stuff. What is your take on all these insurance companies refusing to take on new clients? I'm sure you'll say business as usual. You're an interesting and ok guy but you will never be a man who ever changes his opinion. Maybe your biggest character flaw from what little I know of you.
I like the idea of people not being politicians. I like the idea of businessmen if they are self-made.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
A guy who inherits enough money to hire people from the get-go is nothing special.
Correction - They are special in that they were born into money.
We clearly see this differently.
There is a huge difference between born rich whiteboy and self-made man.
Someone like Trump who was born into money, certainly is open for criticism. But he has proven himself since, and many times over. He's been thru the good and the bad business wise, and has never missed a beat. Even now, with all the heat, he's proving he can hold his poll numbers politically. He's impressive in so many ways.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI like the idea of people not being politicians. I like the idea of businessmen if they are self-made.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
A guy who inherits enough money to hire people from the get-go is nothing special.
Correction - They are special in that they were born into money.
We clearly see this differently.
There is a huge difference between born rich whiteboy and self-made man.
Trump has demonstrated a fixed "slash and burn" approach to business throughout his life, and the same applies to his political maneuvers.
A failed casino operator: hello, bankruptcies.
C'mon, you people are supposed to be savvy gamblers: how can you possibly respect this guy?
Casinos in AC back in the day basically had licenses to print money, and he blew it, multiple times.
He's taken business bankruptcies SIX TIMES: and you want this loser to lead you?
All the other political leaders are 10X the losers that Trump is. That's why I support Trump. He's not as big a loser as those idiots. I think that's what AQ doesn't get. Who am I supposed to support instead of Trump? They are all neocon idiots.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
AQ whines because he can't get me to change my opinion. He wants me to change my opinion but he won't change his opinion. WTF is that? That's just how dumb these libtards are these days. He won't change his opinion but bitches about others won't change their opinions. GTFO!
Nothing wrong with supporting a Republican, Mickey.
Based on what I've seen Pence would be the best choice; at least he's both loyal AND honorable.
Sure, he's religious but I can live with that.
This fact here should disqualify anyone from running for public office as it proves that person is insane.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Supporting is not anywhere the same as loving and worshiping. Come'on dude. Lets be real.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmAll the other political leaders are 10X the losers that Trump is. That's why I support Trump. He's not as big a loser as those idiots. I think that's what AQ doesn't get. Who am I supposed to support instead of Trump? They are all neocon idiots.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
AQ whines because he can't get me to change my opinion. He wants me to change my opinion but he won't change his opinion. WTF is that? That's just how dumb these libtards are these days. He won't change his opinion but bitches about others won't change their opinions. GTFO!
Bro this approach won't work. This is like telling people at church that Jesus and if he did he isn't the son of god. It is obvious but doesn't mean it'll mean anything. Some people born to be those people.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
You're missing the big picture V. Trump used bankruptcies as an important financial tool that worked in his favor every time. And how many billion is he worth? Hardly a loser. Failed casino owner, yes. But to be worth what he is today, he's succeeded at a very high level in order to overcome those. Then he won the presidency despite Hillary's criminal interference and Obama hiding in the shadows calling all the dirty shots.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Pence is a weak presence who thinks just because Evangelicals like him he has a chance. Is he still polling at zero?
It was comical watching CBS News interrupt the Price is Right for a special report about Trump being indicted over a nothing burger since the Deep State psychopaths don't want him going for re-election. Shows yet another example of how fully owned the media and most of the U.S. government is by the Deep State.
So who are we talking about today at the VEGAS, CASINO, GAMBLING forum? Oh Donald Trump. Ok, I get it. He used to own a couple casinos....20 YEARS AGO!
No his casinos are not the topic of discussion here on the VEGAS, CASINO, GAMBLING forum? :confused:
Ok, did he win the World series of poker that I missed? No?
Is he a member of the Blackjack Hall of fame or gambling hall of fame? No?
How about did he at least hit a 1.5 million dollar jackpot after telling everyone he was about to? No, to that too. :rolleyes:
Ok well at least he owns a non-casino hotel in Vegas (make that co-owns). Do we discuss all non-casino Las Vegas hotel co-owners now? I guess that is where we are on the VEGAS, CASINO, GAMBLING forum. :rolleyes:
Maybe tomorrow we can discuss the guy that owns the Downtowner Motel off Fremont, or one of the Motel 6's. :)
The fact of the matter is that The Price is Right has not one, but two, count-em two, wheel spin rounds during each episode.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I still can't get past the latest kewlJ turnabout.
Couldn't you have abstained from the forum for say...one week? Just to make it a little less embarrassing?
I am not the slightest bit embarrassed dude. If you are embarrassed for me, that is on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by smurgerburger
I just don't see how it is anybody else's business, who posts or doesn't post or posts after saying they wouldn't. If that is all you have to hate on, then I am golden. :cool:
If it's not anyone's business why did you post about it in the first place?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI am not the slightest bit embarrassed dude. If you are embarrassed for me, that is on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by smurgerburger
I just don't see how it is anybody else's business, who posts or doesn't post or posts after saying they wouldn't. If that is all you have to hate on, then I am golden. :cool:
Because this is a freaking gambling forum dude. I am sure there are about a million political forums to discuss that shit. There is even a politics section here. Why should this discussion dominate the Las Vegas section of a gambling forum?
You know what this place is like? It is like the senior citizens day care center where people drop off their aging parents while they work. You'll have the exact same discussion among the privileged old white guys expressing their grievances over the checker board.
You should be ecstatic that there's some political chatting going on in this thread. It keeps people from having to constantly witness what a liar and all-around loser you are. DUDE :)Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Ron, I would even rather read about your summer up in Tahoe in your cramped camper.
I read you went out on your boat yesterday. In keeping with Rob Singer tradition, could you run down to the marina, climb up on a boat that doesn't belong to you and snap/post a picture? Try to have the picture facing the lake so it doesn't look like you are docked. And do it quickly before security come after you, screaming "get of that boat....it doesn't belong to you".
I was asking why you announced you were quitting.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
And I don't see how it is your business what I do?Quote:
Originally Posted by smurgerburger
If I decide to post. I post.
If I decide not to. I won't.
If you want to respond. Respond.
If you don't want to respond. Don't respond.
Everyone who declares bankruptcy uses it as an "important financial tool". That is no reason to be impressed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerYou're missing the big picture V. Trump used bankruptcies as an important financial tool that worked in his favor every time. And how many billion is he worth? Hardly a loser. Failed casino owner, yes. But to be worth what he is today, he's succeeded at a very high level in order to overcome those. Then he won the presidency despite Hillary's criminal interference and Obama hiding in the shadows calling all the dirty shots.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Pence is a weak presence who thinks just because Evangelicals like him he has a chance. Is he still polling at zero?
Lets compare him to others - even those more self-made to get a feeling for whether his # of bankruptcies is normal. I have no idea how to do this but I am curious.
The other fact you can't really get past is that he did that same real-estate hustle that the HCL poker guy did. Selling bullshit dreams to suckers. Magical methods that don't exist and for 5 figures. I can google references too if others need a refresher. That isn't shit normal business men do. That is real dirt.
Umm... I did respond, hence this exchange?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJAnd I don't see how it is your business what I do?Quote:
Originally Posted by smurgerburger
If I decide to post. I post.
If I decide not to. I won't.
If you want to respond. Respond.
If you don't want to respond. Don't respond.
I'm just unclear on this "business" stuff, whereby it is your business to post but not anyone else's business to reply to your posts? Something like that?
Learn shame.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI am not the slightest bit embarrassed dude. If you are embarrassed for me, that is on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by smurgerburger
I just don't see how it is anybody else's business, who posts or doesn't post or posts after saying they wouldn't. If that is all you have to hate on, then I am golden. :cool:
So either you are embarassed by this whole thing like you should be and want this thread to work its way off first-page or you just absolutely completely totally can't help yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
You do bring a lot to this forum though kewl. lol
edit - Can you at least point a link to Rob's boat picture lmao.
I am not the least bit embarrassed by this thread. If you think I have something to be embarrassed about, you are reading too many PM's from Mdawg, who is apparently PMing people like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I shared a event, an experience that I had as a blackjack player who plays for a living, just like I have shared hundreds, maybe thousands of experiences since I joined my first forum in 2006. I have shared both good experiences and bad. Winning and losing. This happened to be probably the most negative experience I have had. I shared it just as I have all the others, protecting myself by mis-directing away from the actual casino. At other times I will also delay the telling of an event by weeks or even longer if need be, although that was not the case with this.
Again, this was not some good experience that I am proud of. This was the single worst experience of my career. I would have so much rather this never occurred, and I went on my way doing my thing for another 10+ years. The money I get from this settlement will be a fraction, of what I stood to make in over 10 years. Even less over 15 years. So I can't imagine why people think this is some great thing I made up.
One other thing. I have never had anyone question what I do or how I do it until I got to this forum. I suspect that is because their are fewer blackjack players on this forum, and more people/players that admittedly don't know anything about blackjack card counting, including a very definite group of trolls. This is the first forum that anybody suggested a player couldn't do what I have done in Las Vegas for 10 years. Those people were Rob Singer and Blackhole and to a lesser degree, the late Alan Mendelson. None of the three even plays blackjack let alone have any card counting advantage play knowledge.
I took the time to explain to all of them, some of the techniques I used that allowed me to be welcome to continue to play. Blackhole started a long running thread where I answered every question in detail. Didn't matter because none of them wanted to hear it. They had their little minds, devoid of any blackjack card counting knowledge, made up.
So my point is there are people, admittedly both trolls, plus Alan, who I do not include in the troll group, but he did at times engage in some trolling behavior (we all do), that bitched and moaned that a player couldn't do what I do without major heat issue and countermeasures. So along comes this incident, a botched 86ing, and I share it, and they bitch and moan, not wanting to believe that either.
The fact is that it doesn't matter what I say with this group that I have labeled the "troll patrol". If I say the sky is blue and grass green....they will fight me, because I said it. And it really saddens me that you seem to be moving in that direction too. I just thought more of you than that.
Here is a little hint for you. There are a number of Las Vegas based AP's that participate on this forum. Some regularly and some less frequently from time to time. Most have connections to other Vegas and/or non-Vegas AP's and some have connections within the industry, which is fairly common among AP's in this town. A friend that works here, a brother-in law that works there. If my sharing of this incident wasn't accurate, you would have had a half dozen of these people, people you know, that would have been screaming this is not true. There has not been a one. Just a handful congratulate me, when again, I see nothing worthy of congratulations. I did not win in this situation. But I did share it as I have shared so many experiences. It is that sharing of anything that most definitely is coming to an end. I am not going to put myself through that anymore, whatever I do going forward.
I guess if I have anything at all to be embarrassed about, it is that because I am not a lawyer, I didn't know exactly how everything I was going through worked. I speculated about some things based on how I thought they worked. And I was wrong about some, like the timeline I was given says 60 days to respond when in Nevada it is 21. I am NOT a freaking lawyer, nor have gone through anything like this.
And yes, I mixed up plaintiff and defendant in one post. THAT is ALL these troll haters have on me.....something I said from the very beginning.....I am not a lawyer, don't know how everything works, had never been through anything like this and was learning some as I went. That is it! That is what they have on me. Well that and their ridiculous blinding hate.
Now I guess the real question of the day is: What would Donald Trump, former casino owner, think or say? :D
Boat pic? We spent about 6 hours cruising around the lake yesterday. I rented the boat and its Captain for the day near Zephyr Cove until the late afternoon storms rolled in. We're renting a fishing boat in King's Beach next week along with that ship's "captain" for half a day. Naturally, kew makes things up because he's stuck in his dumpy little hi-rise apt.that his clan pays for.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionSo either you are embarassed by this whole thing like you should be and want this thread to work its way off first-page or you just absolutely completely totally can't help yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
You do bring a lot to this forum though kewl. lol
edit - Can you at least point a link to Rob's boat picture lmao.
But I DO enjoy watching him react to the challenges a few are hitting him with. Especially interesting is how he feels the need to keep repeating "hey gang be fair--I'm not a lawyer and I make lots of stupid mistakes". Psst....don't tell him that's the reason people HIRE a lawyer....to keep the fabricating idiots from stumbling over their own two feet!
As previously said, he only keeps up this going back and forth after claiming he has the fortitude to not respond any more, because he just can't sit still until every last poster says they believe his fairy tale.
There has never been a weaker loser who has walked the earth. And to think he claims guys from Charlie's want to lick his ass.....
Because he's so UNKOOL, hell Tasha is even way cooler!......Right MIA Boz:)Quote:
Originally Posted by smurgerburgerI was asking why you announced you were quitting.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
By the way, what happen to Mr. BOZ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
Holed up in an all black prostitution joint in New Orleans from what I last heard.Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveVarianceBy the way, what happen to Mr. BOZ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
The slots are oddly good there.
Nothing happened to him.Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveVarianceBy the way, what happen to Mr. BOZ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
He comes over here and he has to constantly read about how he's a dirty stinking rat so he doesn't come over here.
He and Mission146 are selling their bullshit over at PFA.
I don't think he's pulling a DIME. Boz has been known to take extended vacations from the forums. About 1/10th of Marathon Mission dissapearing acts :) He should come back soon, at least to PFA BLOAT thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveVarianceBy the way, what happen to Mr. BOZ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
He should be up here at his condo by now. I don't think getting involved in any of kew's hoaxes takes precedence over whatever else he's working on.Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyI don't think he's pulling a DIME. Boz has been known to take extended vacations from the forums. About 1/10th of Marathon Mission dissapearing acts :) He should come back soon, at least to PFA BLOAT thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveVarianceBy the way, what happen to Mr. BOZ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
This was a 23x base unit hit. Niiiiiice 1 AIQ.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI am not the least bit embarrassed by this thread. If you think I have something to be embarrassed about, you are reading too many PM's from Mdawg, who is apparently PMing people like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I shared a event, an experience that I had as a blackjack player who plays for a living, just like I have shared hundreds, maybe thousands of experiences since I joined my first forum in 2006. I have shared both good experiences and bad. Winning and losing. This happened to be probably the most negative experience I have had. I shared it just as I have all the others, protecting myself by mis-directing away from the actual casino. At other times I will also delay the telling of an event by weeks or even longer if need be, although that was not the case with this.
Again, this was not some good experience that I am proud of. This was the single worst experience of my career. I would have so much rather this never occurred, and I went on my way doing my thing for another 10+ years. The money I get from this settlement will be a fraction, of what I stood to make in over 10 years. Even less over 15 years. So I can't imagine why people think this is some great thing I made up.
One other thing. I have never had anyone question what I do or how I do it until I got to this forum. I suspect that is because their are fewer blackjack players on this forum, and more people/players that admittedly don't know anything about blackjack card counting, including a very definite group of trolls. This is the first forum that anybody suggested a player couldn't do what I have done in Las Vegas for 10 years. Those people were Rob Singer and Blackhole and to a lesser degree, the late Alan Mendelson. None of the three even plays blackjack let alone have any card counting advantage play knowledge.
I took the time to explain to all of them, some of the techniques I used that allowed me to be welcome to continue to play. Blackhole started a long running thread where I answered every question in detail. Didn't matter because none of them wanted to hear it. They had their little minds, devoid of any blackjack card counting knowledge, made up.
So my point is there are people, admittedly both trolls, plus Alan, who I do not include in the troll group, but he did at times engage in some trolling behavior (we all do), that bitched and moaned that a player couldn't do what I do without major heat issue and countermeasures. So along comes this incident, a botched 86ing, and I share it, and they bitch and moan, not wanting to believe that either.
The fact is that it doesn't matter what I say with this group that I have labeled the "troll patrol". If I say the sky is blue and grass green....they will fight me, because I said it. And it really saddens me that you seem to be moving in that direction too. I just thought more of you than that.
Here is a little hint for you. There are a number of Las Vegas based AP's that participate on this forum. Some regularly and some less frequently from time to time. Most have connections to other Vegas and/or non-Vegas AP's and some have connections within the industry, which is fairly common among AP's in this town. A friend that works here, a brother-in law that works there. If my sharing of this incident wasn't accurate, you would have had a half dozen of these people, people you know, that would have been screaming this is not true. There has not been a one. Just a handful congratulate me, when again, I see nothing worthy of congratulations. I did not win in this situation. But I did share it as I have shared so many experiences. It is that sharing of anything that most definitely is coming to an end. I am not going to put myself through that anymore, whatever I do going forward.
Watch more of The People's Court, bro.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Cracks me up some of the numbers I see speculated about my settlement. I mean all over the place. :rolleyes: The multimillionaire personal injury lawyer on another forum, came up with settlement amounts of $750k and $75 in the very same post today!! ;) I guess that is not surprising from a guy who said he made half a million over 7 months and then the next day said he was about even over those same 7 months. All over the place!!!!
I wish I could share the amount I got, or will be getting, as I haven't received anything yet. Only because I have shared what I have made over this journey, just as a reference as to what kind of money card counting with a focus on longevity was worth. And this episode or event, unpleasant as it was....is part of that journey. But I can't. I am not allowed. But it just isn't a lot if you base it on potential earnings over 10 years. Maybe that is not fair to do, I don't know. :rolleyes:
I find it very strange that a multi-million dollar attorney is so obsessed with what I make and now a modest settlement amount related to what I make. Is that common? Does Warren Buffet and Elon Musk obsess over what people earning much less than them make? Mark Cuban, Bezos, Bill Gates? I have never seen that. It seems strange to me. Almost <- ;) makes you think none of his numbers are what he says, not that anyone would care.
KJ, MDawg is more concerned about whether what you have reported is actually true.
So for the record, please answer the following question: Did you in fact receive a broken arm while being backroomed, and have you in fact settled the claim with the help of an attorney?
I ask for clarification because I seem to recall you saying to the effect that you'd out-troll the trolls, or something like that.
Answer is yes to both of your questions, MrV.
You are not remembering incorrectly that I have previously said something along the lines of "out-trolling the trolls". What I meant was mickeycrimm's philosophy of hitting back twice as hard with the name calling and attacks. I didn't mean I would create an alternative really like some of these guys do and have done for 20 years. THAT is just nuts.
Also despite that I embraced Mickey's philosophy of out trolling the trolls, you just can't win with that. How does the saying go? If you wrestled with pigs in the mud, you get dirty? Something like that. :rolleyes: So as soon as you begin, they have gotten what they want.
This is very telling and, likely suicidal, to a tightly wound up concocter like kew.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
We already know his publicly available "case" does not appear anywhere on the Clark County website. In fact, no news organizations have reported on it LIKE THEY HAVE FOR EVERY ONE OF NERSESIAN'S CASES--CONFIDENTIAL OR NOT. And did kew actually name the casino? Well, as Dan said, if he didn't then his claim likely is horseshit. So what does an Einstein like kew do? Yup--he tells everyone that he did not name the casino, and can't. Why not? Because he knows he'll get sued if that particular casino was notified of his libel, and most probably, slander because all kew does is yap.
Now kew, how about naming ALL those "LV AP's who reside on this forum" that can verify your fairy tale! And tell us how they know what they know, and how you "know they won't expose anything". Did they sign the same NDA that you did? :) that you can't stop yapping about??
You need to better craft your lies.....
Speak of the devil and he shall appear.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Thanks for weighing in Ron. I hate the through that I am taking you away from your high-end summer camper at Lake Tahoe, just for you to continue your obsessing about "little old me". Ron, it should be a fun time at Tahoe over the next week. Lake Tahoe is a very gay friendly and popular destinations for the California, slightly older gay crown during Pride month. Have fun Rob. :p
Ron, because I am in a good mood today (why wouldn't I be), I'll treat you like a decent person and respond. But this is a one time only thing. In the future if you want me to respond to anything you say you are going to have to say my name, or admit what every knows, that like everything else, you have no clue what it is.
I have never named my attorney in this matter. It is you people that continue to speculate who it might be. Now my attorney, whomever he may be, told me very early on that publicity of this event through the news media "was a way to bring the other side to their knees". That was a direct quote. But at the time, I made it very clear I was not interested in that strategy, for reasons that are surely clear to anyone with half a brain or any understanding of advantage play and players. I later tried to bluff saying I would do whatever it took, but I think everyone that knows even a little about me, understood, I would not be taking that route.
Ron, you are wrong about the assumption that every case the attorney you are speculating about gets tried in and using the media. Some do, because like I have already explained, it is a pretty advantageous tool. But many don't because not just the casino but both parties don't want that. The guy you have mentioned without knowing if he has any involvement or not, has tried well over 100 cases of casino abuse, back rooming, wrongdoing of that nature. I think it is 160 or in the neighborhood. Really only a few have made it to the news. That has to be the strategy pursued and my guess is most cases involving AP's, neither side wants that.
This is just yet another case of you talking about something you have no idea about, Ron.
I am not going to speak to or for any other AP's. What they know, who they know. They are free to do that if they want. But no decent AP is going to try to sabotage another AP's case or situation, but saying what he knows, just to try to harm the original AP. That is how you trolls operate, not AP's. We have some decency.
So nice try Ron. Swing and miss. Strike number 4,862. :cool:
What is my name Ron? No more correspondence with you until you come clean. Shit or get off the pot.
Wow just Wow...Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Put aside your option on believing KJ's claim or not for a minute and just read what Rob wrote...
Rob, in the process of trying to discret KJ, you virtually described your own fictitious $1.5 Million Video Poker win from last summer.
In your short post above, I only had to remove a few sentences to be left with 6 facts that fit YOUR very own lie. I didn't change anything, only removed text that was not relevant, along with adding in the numbers 1 through 6.
1) Suicidal (Check), Concocted lie (Double Check)
2) No news organization reported on what would be the largest VP win in history (Check)
3) Did Rob name the casino? NOPE -- As Rob said himself, it's Horseshit. And Horseshit it is (Check)
4) Rob says he doesn't name the casino due to some agreement or NDA. (Check)
5) More NDA talk...
6) Straight from he horses mouth, "You need to better craft your lies Rob". (Check)
Rob, you see how rediculous you look?
Wise up
19x his own base bet. Not the greatest score but you got a good response out of kewl.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJSpeak of the devil and he shall appear.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Thanks for weighing in Ron. I hate the through that I am taking you away from your high-end summer camper at Lake Tahoe, just for you to continue your obsessing about "little old me". Ron, it should be a fun time at Tahoe over the next week. Lake Tahoe is a very gay friendly and popular destinations for the California, slightly older gay crown during Pride month. Have fun Rob. :p
Ron, because I am in a good mood today (why wouldn't I be), I'll treat you like a decent person and respond. But this is a one time only thing. In the future if you want me to respond to anything you say you are going to have to say my name, or admit what every knows, that like everything else, you have no clue what it is.
I have never named my attorney in this matter. It is you people that continue to speculate who it might be. Now my attorney, whomever he may be, told me very early on that publicity of this event through the news media "was a way to bring the other side to their knees". That was a direct quote. But at the time, I made it very clear I was not interested in that strategy, for reasons that are surely clear to anyone with half a brain or any understanding of advantage play and players. I later tried to bluff saying I would do whatever it took, but I think everyone that knows even a little about me, understood, I would not be taking that route.
Ron, you are wrong about the assumption that every case the attorney you are speculating about gets tried in and using the media. Some do, because like I have already explained, it is a pretty advantageous tool. But many don't because not just the casino but both parties don't want that. The guy you have mentioned without knowing if he has any involvement or not, has tried well over 100 cases of casino abuse, back rooming, wrongdoing of that nature. I think it is 160 or in the neighborhood. Really only a few have made it to the news. That has to be the strategy pursued and my guess is most cases involving AP's, neither side wants that.
This is just yet another case of you talking about something you have no idea about, Ron.
I am not going to speak to or for any other AP's. What they know, who they know. They are free to do that if they want. But no decent AP is going to try to sabotage another AP's case or situation, but saying what he knows, just to try to harm the original AP. That is how you trolls operate, not AP's. We have some decency.
So nice try Ron. Swing and miss. Strike number 4,862. :cool:
What is my name Ron? No more correspondence with you until you come clean. Shit or get off the pot.
Rob has been doing this for quite a while PositiveVariance. Almost everything he says, not just about me, but about anyone he is attacking and trolling, really applies to him. This is called projecting.Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveVariance
Even Rob can't be so stupid that he doesn't know this (or can he? :rolleyes:), so I assume he just likes the attention so much that he is willing to play the part of the buffoon.
I think the concept of a DNA is worth discussing as it relates to gambling, advantage play and advantage players on these forums.Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveVariance
I was involved with legal action that resulted in a settlement. Again, I am not an attorney and haven't asked, so MrV, Regnis or any other attorney can correct me, if I am wrong, but I believe it is pretty common for a settlement to be confidential and have some such language written into the settlement. Often the party settling is doing so to avoid any kind of bad publicity. And that is exactly what occurred in this case.
Now Rob came up with this weird NDA thing last year regarding his "supposed 1.5 million dollar jackpot, that is NOT the way that normally works. Casinos WANT a large jackpot being publicized. It is great publicity for them. They probably would pay for that kind of publicity. So even if the player requests not to be named, the jackpot itself will make the news. That is one of many reasons everyone KNEW Rob's claim was baloney. Well that and the pictures on a computer screen in the storage area of a house. :D
The other time a NDA came into a discussion about AP/gambling play on these forums was when Mdawg paid Michael Shackleford to verify a short winning session, which proved nothing about Mdawgs long-term claims of winning. Mdawg had Shackleford sign an NDA that he wouldn't say anything, nor describe Mdawgs play. If Shackleford did say something he would have had to post that Mdawg was playing a progression wagering type deal, that in no way could result in all the long-term winning he claimed. Mdawg couldn't have that, hence the NDA
In fact Shackleford broke the NDA agreement and actually said something like that, later removed it and suspended himself for breaking the NDA. That is how uncomfortable Mike was with Mdawg using him via a NDA to mis-represent Mdawgs claims. He was willing to break the agreement and pay the price. Whatever you think of him and other things he does or doesn't do, you have to admire that about the guy some of you call "Rusty".
Standard 19x but took 2 spins/lines. So those 2 lines really only returned 10x base unit.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI think the concept of a DNA is worth discussing as it relates to gambling, advantage play and advantage players on these forums.Quote:
Originally Posted by PositiveVariance
I was involved with legal action that resulted in a settlement. Again, I am not an attorney and haven't asked, so MrV, Regnis or any other attorney can correct me, if I am wrong, but I believe it is pretty common for a settlement to be confidential and have some such language written into the settlement. Often the party settling is doing so to avoid any kind of bad publicity. And that is exactly what occurred in this case.
Now Rob came up with this weird NDA thing last year regarding his "supposed 1.5 million dollar jackpot, that is NOT the way that normally works. Casinos WANT a large jackpot being publicized. It is great publicity for them. They probably would pay for that kind of publicity. So even if the player requests not to be named, the jackpot itself will make the news. That is one of many reasons everyone KNEW Rob's claim was baloney. Well that and the pictures on a computer screen in the storage area of a house. :D
The other time a NDA came into a discussion about AP/gambling play on these forums was when Mdawg paid Michael Shackleford to verify a short winning session, which proved nothing about Mdawgs long-term claims of winning. Mdawg had Shackleford sign an NDA that he wouldn't say anything, nor describe Mdawgs play. If Shackleford did say something he would have had to post that Mdawg was playing a progression wagering type deal, that in no way could result in all the long-term winning he claimed. Mdawg couldn't have that, hence the NDA
In fact Shackleford broke the NDA agreement and actually said something like that, later removed it and suspended himself for breaking the NDA. That is how uncomfortable Mike was with Mdawg using him via a NDA to mis-represent Mdawgs claims. He was willing to break the agreement and pay the price. Whatever you think of him and other things he does or doesn't do, you have to admire that about the guy some of you call "Rusty".
Yes, in almost all settlment agreements there is language that prohibites discussing details of the settlment, specifically the amount recieved
Many go as far listing damages for each occurrence.
ie $10,000 In damages to be paid to defendant for each occurrence.
Speaking of when Shakleford met MDAWG, I remember there were several guys, I don't remember all the names but DARKOZ does come to mind, that actually thought MDAWG had some sort of winning system after Shaq's meeting. This opinion of there's did not last long. I knew it was some sort of progression as well, knowing he would win that session 19 out of 20 times. I guess if MDAWG would have lost, and hit that 1 in 20, he would have disappeared from the forum or most likely offered some type of other bet, that had a progression that would be HIGH RISK, LOW REWARD but would most likely result in a session win. Standard martingale stuff -- trading many small wins for one massive bankroll busting loss.