Kewlj Getting Doxxed on WoV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Horse had to ride off into the sunset today. He got made as Robert Harry Argentino, aka Rob Singer. How many aliases is that now, Rob? A dozen?

---

Well, I could have called that one....oh wait I did. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Here's a little history on "horse". Joined WoV on Dec 10. 12 minutes after joining WoV, he makes a post referencing counting two tables. :rolleyes: We are probably talking either Singer or Alan. If I had to guess...Singer. I'll bet Alan knows though...don't you Alan.

---

I said it was either Singer or Alan, because they are the only two people in the world obsessing over tracking two tables (which horse brought up at WoV). Funny though Alan immediately responded that 'horse' was not him, and I didn't really think it was. I have never known Alan to sock pupper. But in his usual way, Alan steered clear of denying that he knew it was Singer. So predictable Alan. You have enabled this guy for years! Often looking the other way. :mad:

Now, speaking of sock puppets, let discuss "barney", on this site. Mr. Argentino (Singer) really needs to find a hobby. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

The unfolding KJ thread at WoV is starting to take off.

One suspension already, and counting.

While KJ has a fan or two, it is his detractors who are ripping him a new one.

Too bad he left this place in a huff.

---

Ok V, lets address this post. The 'detractors' "ripping me a new one" are sock puppets, Horse now identified as Singer, and the poster who started that thread and has attacked me for a solid year, sidthesquid, hasn't been identified by the mod crew at WoV, but he is a member of different handles dating back 10 years to the old original blackjack info. Maybe that is not technically a sock puppet, but it's the same thing. People that use these multiple handles, are trolls, push some sort of non-truth and trying to falsely create a credibility by using multiple handles.

But I want to go back to something else. A while ago I said something about "MrV not caring for me very much". Do you remember that? You immediately responded that I was being overly sensitive, that you didn't have a dislike for me.

So, lets examine a couple of your recent actions.

1.) In this post (quoted) you call attention to, make that, seem to gleefully announce people on another website "ripping me a new one". Sock puppets by the way.

2.) At WoV, when a poster, 'Dark Oz' posts in support of me, reminding members of what my banning was really about, you immediately call for his suspension.

But gee, I am being overly sensitive. MrV, you are not against me...and then being untruthful about it. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Redietz an offer from any casino that does not include New Year's Eve is actually kind of worthless. So you are welcome to keep your top secret offer for those free nights to yourself.

---

Of course it included New Year's Eve. That was the point. But thanks for your usual horse's ass insights.

I made a posting exception here because someone informed me Mr. Mendelson once again commented on something I said without knowing what he was talking about.

---

Redietz you said the offer is straddling New Year's Eve. Straddling means to be on either side of something. You should have said the offer includes NYE but in your zeal to use big words and to impress us you used the wrong word.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Redietz an offer from any casino that does not include New Year's Eve is actually kind of worthless. So you are welcome to keep your top secret offer for those free nights to yourself.

---

Of course it included New Year's Eve. That was the point. But thanks for your usual horse's ass insights.

I made a posting exception here because someone informed me Mr. Mendelson once again commented on something I said without knowing what he was talking about.

---

Redietz you said the offer is straddling New Year's Eve. Straddling means to be on either side of something. You should have said the offer includes NYE but in your zeal to use big words and to impress us you used the wrong word.

---

Straddle: sit or stand with one leg on either side of.

This does not mean to be on either side of something. It means to be on both sides of something.

Ergo a three night offer straddling New Year's Eve.

Here's another interesting observation about this doxxing incident, and attacks of me that have been allowed at WoV.

Earlier this week, with a rash of sock puppet activity, Mike Shackleford, announced that anyone identified as a sock puppet would not only be immediately nuked (they likely had already been), but in a change of policy, their posts as the sock puppet would be removed.

So here is "horse" identified as sock puppet of previously banned, Singer, who makes multiple posts attacking and trying to discredit me and guess what?...those posts are allowed to stand, despite Mike's own new policy. You can bet if a sock puppet showed up supporting me, and was identified as a sock puppet, the posts (of support) would be removed. Just an interesting bit of bias.

I can't help but wonder why the helpful and objective MrV didn't point that one out. Also noted is the silence of my so called AP friends on that forum. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Of course it included New Year's Eve. That was the point. But thanks for your usual horse's ass insights.

I made a posting exception here because someone informed me Mr. Mendelson once again commented on something I said without knowing what he was talking about.

---

Redietz you said the offer is straddling New Year's Eve. Straddling means to be on either side of something. You should have said the offer includes NYE but in your zeal to use big words and to impress us you used the wrong word.

---

Straddle: sit or stand with one leg on either side of.

This does not mean to be on either side of something. It means to be on both sides of something.

Ergo a three night offer straddling New Year's Eve.

---

To be on both sides (straddling) NYE does not mean NYE is included. Why don't you simply say "New Year's Eve is included" instead of trying to justify your error I'm diction?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

To be on both sides (straddling) NYE does not mean NYE is included. Why don't you simply say "New Year's Eve is included" instead of trying to justify your error I'm diction?

---

In other words, redietz, it's 1 in 6 not 1 in 11. Alan, how do you justify your error in interpretation?

KJ, your "friends" on WoV are Shackleford lackeys. He let the negative comments about you stand but what would have happened to anyone who brought up how unfair your banning was. They all got their noses up his ass. It's disgusting. I just wouldn't participate on a forum where I had to kiss ass like that. Shackleford is a punk. He needs his ass kicked. All you Shackleford lackeys make sure you run and tell what I said. You don't want to miss out on getting more shit on your nose.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

To be on both sides (straddling) NYE does not mean NYE is included. Why don't you simply say "New Year's Eve is included" instead of trying to justify your error I'm diction?

---

In other words, redietz, it's 1 in 6 not 1 in 11. Alan, how do you justify your error in interpretation?

---

Not my error. The honorable redietz chose the wrong word. You must be careful using those $2 words.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

To be on both sides (straddling) NYE does not mean NYE is included. Why don't you simply say "New Year's Eve is included" instead of trying to justify your error I'm diction?

---

In other words, redietz, it's 1 in 6 not 1 in 11. Alan, how do you justify your error in interpretation?

---

Not my error. The honorable redietz chose the wrong word. You must be careful using those $2 words.

---

This from a 1in 6 idiot.

Mickey know you've become a troll.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LarryS

listen dude, if you use that phrase on a public message board you open yourself up to whatever comes your way.

you reap what you sow.

dont complain to me.

you make it sound like using that phrase is acceptable and my less vulgar comments area actionable for banning

what hypocrisy

you notice whe n you used that phrase, I didnt ask for your banning. I am a big boy.

you need to put on your big boy pants when you come to message boards...or it will drive you to drink

---

You're a punk bitch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LarryS

mc,,,calling people gay is not an insult unless you feel gay people are inferior. I can call people heterosexual and get no pushback from you.

secondly KJ compared me to a mass murderer....and you think being compared to a mass murderer insane person, is trumped by being called gay, or an asshole as you called me. Seems to me you have low esteem of your sexuality .

---

You're a crybaby punk bitch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LarryS

You might crave controversy but I don't. And I had no problem with how things were after Singer was banned. I don't want to read what larry writes and he should be banned. Blocking is not the answer. It allows him to continue with his deplorable content. Besides the other trolling, larry continues to bash gays with snide remarks. He even accuses people who are not gay of being gay.

from the moment I arrived here both you and KJ were demanding my banning. You both labeled me with insulting worlds like asshole. On another board you invited the Admin to put his mouth on your manhood,,,,and to me that is a homosexual act. So forgive me if I put 2 and 2 together and came up with 4.
On this board you have been known to use the words f...ing c...sucker, and c..t. Yet I am not calling for your banning.
Thosewords may be offensive to some...especially women whomight want to join.
Also offensive to those raised differently than you.
But I say to each his own. We allhad different parents, and I dont begrudge people behaving in a manner in which they were raised especially nameless faceless people.

So you MC have a big case of "do as I say, not as I do:". Where your shit dont stink....but other selective people's shit does.
You decide who's shit stinks.CertaINLY NOT YOURS, not KJ's, not redietz, not any of thepeople in your merry contingent.

I see

AND WHY ISNT BLOCKING THE ANSWER????

YOU are anonymous.....what I SAY DOESNT AFFECT YOU ONE WAY OR THE OTHER,......its not like I am ruining your busiess.....you are still free to drive to casinos and win your mini 22.25 jackpots. Thats the whole function of a blocking button....you can rid yourself of your angst while still enjoying other posters

---

I play off $400 to $600 a day in expectation. I'm sure you don't know what that is because you are a whining little punk bitch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LarryS

Heck, I didnt come here till MC invited me by badmouthing me and it was brought to my attention. He had no problem doing it behind my back, but now that we are electronically face to face..he crys like a baby.

---

No, you are the little bitch crybaby. Troll on, bitch. So Mr. V is your snitch lackey, eh? Here's the problem, V. Would you like to tell me that on Gambler's Glen and Penalty Box your friend, Larry the little bitch, wasn't badmothing me and others, not just once in a while either, but every fucking day? Did you come over here and inform me and others of that? No, you didn't. Your bitch has the gall to say I was talking about him behind his back. V, someone needs to teach you what a friend is. This guy is no friend of yours. You are his lackey bitch.

I'm slowing down my participation here. You and your little bitch friend can takeover. It's nothing but a troll site again. Your little bitch friend will put on airs about contributing to gambling threads but the problem is he knows nothing about gambling. Nothing. Zilch. Nada. He's an idiot when it comes to gambling. The perfect troll for everyone to gain no gambling insight from. A nothing, no good, little bitch troll.

KJ, what's up with this Mrbo in your thread at WoV?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Here's another interesting observation about this doxxing incident, and attacks of me that have been allowed at WoV.

Earlier this week, with a rash of sock puppet activity, Mike Shackleford, announced that anyone identified as a sock puppet would not only be immediately nuked (they likely had already been), but in a change of policy, their posts as the sock puppet would be removed.

So here is "horse" identified as sock puppet of previously banned, Singer, who makes multiple posts attacking and trying to discredit me and guess what?...those posts are allowed to stand, despite Mike's own new policy. You can bet if a sock puppet showed up supporting me, and was identified as a sock puppet, the posts (of support) would be removed. Just an interesting bit of bias.

I can't help but wonder why the helpful and objective MrV didn't point that one out. Also noted is the silence of my so called AP friends on that forum. :rolleyes:

---

Have you ever concidered the fact that The Wizard does not yet know who horse is/was and he has not seen the current scuttlebutt?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Mickey now you've become a troll.

---

Yes, Larry has turned it back into a troll site. So get the troll on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Mickey now you've become a troll.

---

Yes, Larry has turned it back into a troll site. So get the troll on.

---

Why? You have to show you have a bigger set of balls? You have to be the bigger bully?

And that goes for everyone else. What are you proving with inane insults and comments?

[QUOTE=Alan Mendelson;57289][QUOTE=mickeycrimm;57288]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

. What are you proving with inane insults and comments?

---

I don't know. Ask Larry.