Printable View
Nobody is saying that you doubted redietz, Alan. That has nothing to do with the fact that you requested redietz send you the package and provided an address. When you did that, you were agreeing to act as arbitrator....to view the contents of the package and confirm redietz's identity. THAT is where you failed. You agreed to do something and failed to carry through. Failed to keep your word.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Well I'm sorry but I have a life and other things csme up including Tony's schedule and i couldn't do it. Redietz could have posted it here on the forum just as I suggested.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJNobody is saying that you doubted redietz, Alan. That has nothing to do with the fact that you requested redietz send you the package and provided an address. When you did that, you were agreeing to act as arbitrator....to view the contents of the package and confirm redietz's identity. THAT is where you failed. You agreed to do something and failed to carry through. Failed to keep your word.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
This has nothing to do with Tony. No one here knows who Tony is, nor cares. This has to do with one thing and one thing only. YOU....Alan Mendelson....agreed to do something....to act as arbitrator....to view the package and report back to us. And now 8 weeks and 2 days later, we are still waiting for you to keep your word. Nothing or no one else matters....not Tony, not your girlfriend. Nor is anyone else to blame.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
It is you...Alan Mendelson, who has not kept your word......PERIOD!
Okay sue me.
First of all, they're not my dogs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Second of all, I didn't say you, Alan Mendelson, had to read anything. I said if my plane went down, I wanted someone to verify that Rob Singer had been lying about me on this forum. If that was you, great. If not, pass the stuff onto Dan or someone who would.
Third, I assumed you would know copyrighted stuff shouldn't be posted. I listed what was in the package in a separate PM, and clearly the majority of the material would have some kind of copyright. I didn't spell that out because you would know that much better than me. Right?
Fourth, I wasn't holding you to some kind of contract to be an arbiter. But your decision that you didn't want the material FOLLOWED your decision to post an address to have me send it, so naturally forum readers would assume you were going to say something about it.
Fifth, I'm getting the feeling my chain may been yanked multiple times here. Alan posts an address to which to send the package. Was it to see if I really had material and was going to send it? I don't know. I say "Alrighty!" Suddenly Alan changes his mind.
Then, Alan asks me to verify why the name on the return label isn't mine, and that he's going to post a photo of the front of the mailer with the name and address on it. Was it to see if I would think it was a bad idea? I don't know. I say, basically, alrighty again. Rob blows a gasket and puts himself in another position to be identified as a liar (once again). And then Alan changes his mind . . . again.
Just send the stuff off to Dan, for God's sake. I'll reimburse you the postage. It's not that complicated.
Really, Rob should be banned for nonsense like this. The arrogance of it is ridiculous.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerThis is nothing but more bs and posturing by redietz. Just another red flag in a series of baloney. And then he makes up how he "lives" on the west coast, as if to give the perception that he and this "former vp of Boeing" are tight. We'll redietz, I'm a former vp of Northrop Grumman, and we had a huge amount of work on major programs sub-contracted to Boeing. Care to identify him--I may know him and/or he may know me. Or are you worried about "copyright infringement" once again, just so you can feel good not supporting your bs again.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyLike everyone else, I have no idea what you sent, other than that it's dozens of pages.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
How did all of that stuff get to the west coast?
Alan was going to post the name and address on the label on the forum. I didn't have an issue with that.
Here's one better. The address on the package label is 75 miles from the address to which I mailed it. I assume Alan is closer than his office by 20-30 miles. Rob, why don't you just ask Alan to show up unannounced any time in the next couple of weeks at the address on the label, and he can check to see if the guy I mentioned and I are both at the address? As your dear and true friend, certainly Alan can help you out confirming what an accurate, stand-up guy you are.
Boy, that sounds like a real solid plan to expose all of my BS. Doesn't it, buddy? All my BS right out the window. I'll be so discredited, how could I show my face on the internet again?
I've gotta warn you, though. I jog a couple of miles at 8 AM each day, then head to Panera down the road for oatmeal and a coffee. So if he checks on me at 8 AM or thereabouts, he may not catch both of us there.
Amazing, huh? That I can afford Panera, I mean. Their oatmeal is pretty pricey.
P.S. I think I have a copy of most of the package stuff lying around here somewhere. Alan could kill two birds with one stone (while saving gas money), and check out the material while confirming that I'm not here. Boy, that sounds like investigative journalism at its most decisive. No ambiguity regarding who can see what from what table. Just a nice decisive outcome debunking someone. It's a damned shame that someone would be named Singer/Argentino.
Redietz you sent that email to both me and Dan. Did Dan respond to you? If he did, use his address and send it to him. I don't have Dan's address. Dan confirmed that already. In fact the only time I saw Dan was when by coincidence we were both having dinner at Nobu.
Now one more time: you can take a photo of your byline on any copyrighted article and post it under fair use. Stop skirting the issue.
Also I will have your documents God forbid anything happens to you. Since that was your concern and since you are alive and well there is no need for me to do anything per your second point above.
So as redietz said... I have his package folks. I wish redietz a long life so I don't have to do anything with it. Redietz said I didn't have to read it unless his plane went down. Please redietz, live long and prosper.
About the envelope: actually I was going to obscure the name and most of the return address but just the state might have caused an eyebrow to be raised, so it was better that was explained by redietz.
Live long and prosper.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Z6BkzfgavQQuote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
So that there is no question, I have posted the quote from redietz. It clearly says when I had to read the documents. Thank you redietz, the long national nightmare is now over. Rest assured that if God forbid something happens to you, your precious documents will be read. They are safe and secure in the office where only Tony (and I guess his landlord) have the key. But I wish you many years of long life and happiness and you might very well outlive me because I am older than you are.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Think of the package now as a time capsule, to be read in some far, distant time, just as you wanted. (Of course, if you are so inclined, you could post it yourself, now.)
Live long and prosper, redietz. Live long and prosper.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cr2vj87DRKM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan MendelsonSo that there is no question, I have posted the quote from redietz. It clearly says when I had to read the documents. Thank you redietz, the long national nightmare is now over. Rest assured that if God forbid something happens to you, your precious documents will be read. They are safe and secure in the office where only Tony (and I guess his landlord) have the key. But I wish you many years of long life and happiness and you might very well outlive me because I am older than you are.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Think of the package now as a time capsule, to be read in some far, distant time, just as you wanted. (Of course, if you are so inclined, you could post it yourself, now.)
Live long and prosper, redietz. Live long and prosper.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cr2vj87DRKM
Actually, Alan, what I expected was for you to at least read the stuff. Not necessarily post anything, but read it.
You went out of your way to state that kewlj had "been caught" telling tall tales regarding tracking a second table, and that you weren't going to let up on him. You stated this as if for a fact you knew he couldn't do it. You called him out.
But when Rob Singer gets definitively exposed as having libeled me for a year, lied about me for a year, and even in the last 48 hours, made whack job accusations presented as fact that can easily be demonstrated as lies, you can't get the words out of your keyboard or mouth, "Rob Singer was dead wrong. Rob Singer told tall tales. Rob Singer lied."
Can't quite do it, eh?
Pitiful, really.
I will read it, redietz. First I have to be at the office when Tony is at the office. But since you're alive and well.... and I hope you will be a for a long time.... what's the rush?
By the way, you sent the original email to Dan also. Did Dan send you his address? Perhaps Dan will be able to read it before I will. Again, I don't have Dan's address and Dan confirmed that here.
Now, Tony did read to me what was on about 15 of the pages you sent and they CONFIRM there were articles authored by Robert Dietz. Tony did see what appeared to be display ads or graphics that list you as a winner or finalist in various gaming tournaments. Isn't that what you wanted me to see? I trust Tony. I didn't tell him to look for those things, I asked him to tell me what he saw. He saw what you wanted me to see. I think it's a closed case.
Again, why won't you just take photos of your byline with article titles which is okay to do under fair use of the copyright law and post it here? You could do that in five minutes, which is less time than it would take me just to walk out of my place and get in my car and turn the ignition key. It would take me another half hour or so to drive to Tony's office. Imagine how much more you could do in less time?
Frankly you've wasted a lot of time here. All of this could have been avoided if you just did it yourself. Why couldn't you?
By the way, just to answer what Rob Singer is certain to ask: was there any proof in the envelope that YOU are the Robert Dietz who wrote the articles and won the contests? I don't doubt you are, but Rob will. He's already said so. I didn't make that up.
I cannot defend Rob Singer. Heaven knows I've said it over and over again. I also told you several times in private messages that you should ignore Rob. I've also posted on this forum that everyone should ignore Rob. Frankly, I've learned to ignore Rob when he libels me.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
So, for the record:
Rob Singer: My business partner Tony, who owns Axis Media, and is the tenant and the only one with the key to the office where the package was sent, has looked in the package. He has found copies of numerous articles authored by Robert Dietz. He has also found print outs of ads and displays that show Robert Dietz has won or placed in various gaming tournaments. I asked Tony if he found any copies of IDs such as a driver license or passport and he says he did not.
Redietz: as I have written before, Rob Singer will now claim that there is no link between the articles and that you are in fact Robert Dietz. I know this is going to happen. Now, do you want to continue this fight with Rob or do you just want to ignore him as I've been suggesting you do?
Be smart: ignore him.
Rob: stop it. You're being ridiculous.
Typical diverting when pinned to the wall. The easy way out would be to simply tell us his name. But noooo....you've got to make it a drama by doing the two-step again--just like your plethora of silly excuses why you won't post your so-called accolades yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzLOL -- want to bet on the reality of what I said, Rob? I'll even trust Alan, with whom I am not on the best of terms, to hold the money.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerThis is nothing but more bs and posturing by redietz. Just another red flag in a series of baloney. And then he makes up how he "lives" on the west coast, as if to give the perception that he and this "former vp of Boeing" are tight. We'll redietz, I'm a former vp of Northrop Grumman, and we had a huge amount of work on major programs sub-contracted to Boeing. Care to identify him--I may know him and/or he may know me. Or are you worried about "copyright infringement" once again, just so you can feel good not supporting your bs again.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
What is the rush?? .....we are in week 9 after you told us not once but twice that you go to the office once a week.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Remember this quote (above), made July 27, 2017. "I won't get it till next week". THAT is you COMMITTING to get the package by the first week in August!
Definition of commit: A pledge or bond, a promise to do something.
This seems to be your new 'defense'. Initially Dan didn't respond. He wasn't all that interested in getting involved.....true. But there came a point that even Dan, one of your biggest supporters realized you were stone-walling and you could not be trusted to keep your word.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Bottom line: Get off your fucking ass and keep your promise, you freaking lying loser.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Yeah, I'm pinned to the wall. That's why I invited a journalist half an hour away to show up anytime and verify everything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerTypical diverting when pinned to the wall. The easy way out would be to simply tell us his name. But noooo....you've got to make it a drama by doing the two-step again--just like your plethora of silly excuses why you won't post your so-called accolades yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzLOL -- want to bet on the reality of what I said, Rob? I'll even trust Alan, with whom I am not on the best of terms, to hold the money.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Rob, you're a clown. If you want to wager on this, the bank's open, dude. One of us is a liar; one ain't. Put your money where your mouth is, and we'll see if this advantage play beats the great Rob Singer. Or is somebody lacking confidence in his opining these days?
This stuff is hilarious....and there's so much of it! Great reading this morning :) Now for some meaningful comments:
How funny is it as we picture kew jumping up and down in his seat like a little fairy being frustrated by Alan? I think kew loves the feeling he gets from it, because he must purposely not read what Alan posts and always proceeds to create conflict. Those kind of people are like that--agenda-driven, you know.
mickey's drunk as usual. And if you can't tell, he's what's called a "mean drunk". Could be why he never married and has no friends. Could be a woman beater after a binge.
Alan: of course you are very clear and very right, but the poodles don't want it to be and don't want to listen. You can post/explain anything redietz has foolishly sent you, but without proof of identity then none of it means a thing--esp. to me. And after all, did I not command the phony and is he not moving to the snap of my whip, when he was told to provide proof of accolades? So for him to send an incomplete pkg. and then blame you for this, then that is chickenshit of him. WHY DO YOU THINK HE SENT IT FROM SOME OBSCURE PLACE IN CALIF. WITHOUT HIS "NAME" & RETURN ADDRESS ON IT? The deception is clear as day.
redietz: I know I've gotten under your skin when you write a thousand rambling words, claim I'm lying about you, I catch you using deceptive mailing methods, and show your need to keep saying my name over & over as if it's having the same effect as you pounding sand! Face it--you're just too devious to identify yourself, and who cares about winning "contests" as proof of anything anyway? That's like a vp player posting his or her stack of W2G's and claiming these are "accolades" you need so much for others to see. Only problem? No one knows you or who you are....or who "Robert Dietz" really is. Get it yet?
Jerry Logan: People from WoV tend to remember when somebody gives them a good licking (careful kew....again!). No I'm not JL, as much as the WoV crowd wanted and apparently still wants me to be. But Jerry is a friend if mine (and former student who made big money playing my strategy jbjb--yes, you who constantly claims no one plays it even after he posted his results on WoV for quite a while). He also keeps in contact with me and lives in Mesa or Tempe.
Ha! I've got you so flustered that you can't even identify what you're wanting to lose money on :) And thank you for the blistering name-calling. That tells me you're likely developing boils over me.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzYeah, I'm pinned to the wall. That's why I invited a journalist half an hour away to show up anytime and verify everything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerTypical diverting when pinned to the wall. The easy way out would be to simply tell us his name. But noooo....you've got to make it a drama by doing the two-step again--just like your plethora of silly excuses why you won't post your so-called accolades yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Rob, you're a clown. If you want to wager on this, the bank's open, dude. One of us is a liar; one ain't. Put your money where your mouth is, and we'll see if this advantage play beats the great Rob Singer. Or is somebody lacking confidence in his opining these days?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYYoFl8oAkEQuote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
I'm really sorry kewlj but I've made changes in my life. And soon I am moving OUT of Southern California and then I will rarely if ever go to the office again. I'm retiring, guys. I'm already collecting my pension and starting October 11th my Social Security starts.
I've already told my clients that after December I will no longer be doing a weekly Best Buys TV Show. I will continue to do Infomercials and from time to time I will do a Best Buys Special. We are thinking about doing a Best Buys Special for Presidents Day Sales and then another for Mothers Day Sales and then another for Fathers Day and graduations. But the weekly grind is ending for me. It's time to be "semi retired."
Tony (who is actually about 8 years my senior) is also retiring (he's in his 70s as you can figure) which is why he isn't in the office so much anymore.
Kewlj, Tony has told me what's in the package and so far, redietz has not disputed what Tony told me. What are you expecting for me to see in the package that will change things? Please tell me. Use red font if you must.
edited to add: I'm not going to ask Tony to rewrap the package (redietz would you care to describe the intricate wrapping and over-wrapping you used?) and then take it a mile and a half away to the post office to mail to me. Everything we do is by email, or by phone. Even with the TV stations there is no more snail mail. Even contracts are "signed" via email. Payments are made electronically -- no one sends paper checks anymore, and when they are sent that way, there is an outgoing mail slot in the lobby of the building. And the package won't fit in the mail slot.
If it's so important, kewlj, ask redietz to send the stuff to you. redietz says he has plenty of copies and he's obviously not worried about the copyright laws affecting photo copies but he is concerned about taking photos of his byline and names. Go figure.
And redietz, why don't you get Dan's address and mail him the package directly. This way kewlj will not accuse me of altering the contents of the package. Yeah. that's coming. Can't you tell?