Printable View
I'm talking more about the Newell. Sometimes it seems like Rob might be trolling other people, but other times it seems like he really really wants to just fit in and be believed. I really don't know. I find this aspect fascinating. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission146
How much ROB is emotionally invested!!?? That's what fascinates you about this?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
He's very fascinating. For example in the GOAT YouTube interview with Alan, he's extremely well spoken and believable. No that doesn't mean I believe you owned a Newell or made millions with the Double Up bug Rob :) On the flip side, I have a very hard time believing he's been a failure in life, as UNKOOL1 repeatedly suggests, without proof ( other then trailer in Pahrump). Shits and giggles aside, everything known about him disproves that theory. Unless someone puts up credible proof, I believe he's lead a middle class life for the most part.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI'm talking more about the Newell. Sometimes it seems like Rob might be trolling other people, but other times it seems like he really really wants to just fit in and be believed. I really don't know. I find this aspect fascinating. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mission146How much ROB is emotionally invested!!?? That's what fascinates you about this?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Newell or no Newell, the pictures posted, I am 99.9999999% sure, were not HIS Newell. It was as if no effort was taken for the picture to NOT appear staged; they were almost to the point of deliberately looking staged. It was honestly a brilliant bit of trolling on Rob's part---you have to figure that the goal isn't to PROVE anything. Proving it would be easily done in about 8,000 different ways. But, if the goal is to keep the conversation going and people ripping their hair out, well, here we are.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I have no idea how much of a success of failure Rob was in real life outside of gambling. All I have said is that if you look up his publicly available records, showing no real estate owned ect, it doesn't seem to mesh with all that Rob claimed. Maybe he lived a middle class life. Don't know. Don't care. I was only concerned with his claims of gambling. Now Dan Druff suggested that Rob may have gambled away any money that he had or earned. I don't know about that either. I mean it seems like The former owner of this forum made a pretty good living for many years as a reporter I guess and now seems to have little to show for it other maybe a decent pension. So that does happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
Casinos have torched the futures of many people that would have otherwise retired successfully. As a matter of fact, they are built on the backs of people like Singer and Alan......RIPQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI have no idea how much of a success of failure Rob was in real life outside of gambling. All I have said is that if you look up his publicly available records, showing no real estate owned ect, it doesn't seem to mesh with all that Rob claimed. Maybe he lived a middle class life. Don't know. Don't care. I was only concerned with his claims of gambling. Now Dan Druff suggested that Rob may have gambled away any money that he had or earned. I don't know about that either. I mean it seems like The former owner of this forum made a pretty good living for many years as a reporter I guess and now seems to have little to show for it other maybe a decent pension. So that does happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
It's very possible he's lost several million gambling over the last 25+ years, hence not having a pot to piss in, thru his remaining glory years. His buddy Alan is a very good example of this. No matter how successful one is or should be, all it takes is one severe vice ( gambling, drugs, alcohol etc) for it to evaporate completely. No matter how much income and or retirement savings one has.
What amazes me is how much people care about what other people have or don't have.
What amazes me is how many people think that what they have or don't have defines them. Then expend massive amounts ofQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
effort to alter the perception of reality regarding their situation.
Everyone comes in with nothing and leaves with the same.
Not defending Rob, but if you don’t want people to know you own property, you create a trust and purchase it through that. ANYONE can do that, you don’t have to be rich, and any half competent real estate agent knows about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI have no idea how much of a success of failure Rob was in real life outside of gambling. All I have said is that if you look up his publicly available records, showing no real estate owned ect, it doesn't seem to mesh with all that Rob claimed. Maybe he lived a middle class life. Don't know. Don't care. I was only concerned with his claims of gambling. Now Dan Druff suggested that Rob may have gambled away any money that he had or earned. I don't know about that either. I mean it seems like The former owner of this forum made a pretty good living for many years as a reporter I guess and now seems to have little to show for it other maybe a decent pension. So that does happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
I'm pouring out a sip for the ploppies all around us.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenCasinos have torched the futures of many people that would have otherwise retired successfully. As a matter of fact, they are built on the backs of people like Singer and Alan......RIPQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI have no idea how much of a success of failure Rob was in real life outside of gambling. All I have said is that if you look up his publicly available records, showing no real estate owned ect, it doesn't seem to mesh with all that Rob claimed. Maybe he lived a middle class life. Don't know. Don't care. I was only concerned with his claims of gambling. Now Dan Druff suggested that Rob may have gambled away any money that he had or earned. I don't know about that either. I mean it seems like The former owner of this forum made a pretty good living for many years as a reporter I guess and now seems to have little to show for it other maybe a decent pension. So that does happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
Not many of them were machine telepathic.
There are only a few options here.
Rob really didn't fritter away his earnings and has invested all his $$ in properties through his kids but why is he telling Alan he can mentally talk to the machines? Either he believed it or it was the setup for a scam. Perhaps the scam was selling the book but man if you have to do that for money, you can't be doing that well. He could be a perfectly competent person but still have some brain defect where the machine 'talks to him' and tells him 'play me play me'.
I ask you dear readers, which makes more sense?
The same people that do that don't lease apartments or live in RV parks.Quote:
Originally Posted by mcapNot defending Rob, but if you don’t want people to know you own property, you create a trust and purchase it through that. ANYONE can do that, you don’t have to be rich, and any half competent real estate agent knows about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI have no idea how much of a success of failure Rob was in real life outside of gambling. All I have said is that if you look up his publicly available records, showing no real estate owned ect, it doesn't seem to mesh with all that Rob claimed. Maybe he lived a middle class life. Don't know. Don't care. I was only concerned with his claims of gambling. Now Dan Druff suggested that Rob may have gambled away any money that he had or earned. I don't know about that either. I mean it seems like The former owner of this forum made a pretty good living for many years as a reporter I guess and now seems to have little to show for it other maybe a decent pension. So that does happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
Also, you would be hard pressed to find anyone that owns a Newell using a Mini Winnie camper. That's akin to saying MDog is hitting the town sporting a Timex on his wrist. What's the likelihood of that?
For whatever reason, I never talked to him about it, my stepfather never put property in his name. He even bought a tavern in Oregon and put it in his daughter's name.
I think its been about 5 to 6 months without an operational shower in our house.
We endured.
Probably two more days to complete the drywall and painting.
Tonight might be the night to test out one of the showers but probably best to wait till Sunday or Monday to let everything cure and dry.
Whatever.
It was a total failure on my part.
Probably cost me about 3 grand extra thinking I could Do It Myself.
Could of been worse.
I could of let professionals do it that didn't realize I had KITEC and I'd really be screwed in the following months.
I went with ONYX Solid Surface Showers in both bathrooms.
I got raped on the price for everything!
After waiting 4 months it turns out you just don't care anymore.
You just want operational bathrooms.
Fake Wood Tile for the flooring.
Kohler Elongated Toilets.
Perhaps a few extra pictures later next week.
Congratulations to MaxPen on his job well done.
He certainly is the better man.
I paid a big Samoan arborist $1600.00 today to trim / thin trees and shrubs.
Him and his son knocked it out and removed all the cuttings in six hours.
Good payday, but they earned it: climbing a ladder 15 feet in the air and lopping branches over and over with a chain saw held only in one hand ain't easy.
You got bent over, 1k cash in hand. You got taken for 6 hundy.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
That looks nice and clean. The solid surface should be easy maintenance.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
I am going to do another bathroom soon. Kind of along the lines of the other one. I am missing having an ongoing project.
Will post pics.
If you're paying $1k a day for 2 gardeners then you're getting ripped off too.......RIPQuote:
Originally Posted by OzzyYou got bent over, 1k cash in hand. You got taken for 6 hundy.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
They're not garderners, they're arborists.
Have you checked arborists' rates lately?
Anyway I was glad to pay it, they knew just what to do (I didn't): they had special equipment and removed lots of dead branches high up, thinned trees, topped and shaped shrubs, chipped what they could and hauled off stuff too big for the wood chipper.
I have a lot of plants and trees here, most were installed by a professional landscape designer years before i bought it, and without proper attention it will go to riot and the property will look like shit.
Candidly it felt weird to pay that much money to him and his son for six or so hours work but my wife, who formerly worked in a nursery, agreed that they did a great job and that the price was fair.
But $1600.00?
Ah well, we earns our money and makes our choices how to spend it.
Tomorrow I'm off to Spirit Mtn. and Chinook Winds Casino on the Oregon coast: as they say: "Hope springs eternal."
I respect you for this. Nobody knows how local markets deviate on price to even criticize and then the waste of time and possible low quality for the low price, not worth it.If you've got it, flaunt it.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
I was over at Diversity Tomorrow reading a few pages about the Freedom Convoy.
Those members over there are some sick individuals.
I guess they were against people protesting and throwing tea into the Boston Harbor?
I suppose they think that the American Revolution was illegal and an unjust cause!?
I'm not sure why these people want to live in a country like America?
Long Live Big Brother!!
Tell us more about mistakes you are making.....RIP :)Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
No Twitter?Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
No Diversity Tomorrow?
No WoV?
No Fun!!
Yeah, trying to destroy the economy because the gov't tells you to wear a mask ... christ on a crutch!
Baldwin drop just landed a few minutes ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetNo Twitter?Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
No Diversity Tomorrow?
No WoV?
No Fun!!
These "protesters" aka "scofflaws" are nothing but big babies, going WAH WAH WAH over masks and vaccines.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
Save talk of revolution for more serious stuff and not for political gamesmanship as is the case here.
It's not about wearing a mask or taking a vaccine you dumb son of a bitch.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
It's about the government forcing laws onto citizens and if they don't comply they lose their job, can't shop inside stores, travel or cross the border.
Some countries have implemented a 4,000 dollar fine if you don't take the shot.
It won't be long till they jail and or execute a person if they don't take the shot.
Other countries force you into a 14 day Covid Camp if you don't comply or you catch the virus.
You won't be happy until the government controls every aspect of your life.
You are the same guy that wants to beat the homeless with a baseball bat.
Fuck Off.
It's obviously about masks and vaccines you incredibly disputatious son of a bitch.
Governments control populations: it's what they do, and what they're supposed to do.
Without laws and regulations the shit would fly and society would fall apart.
You want to take me on about the homeless, tough guy?
Bring it on.
Cucked the fuck out........RIPQuote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
This makes me want to borrow the wall tent and join the truckers.
A little bit cold though....lol
Monet 1 BetCheckBet 0
I can't for the life of me, figure out why some are getting so bent out of shape about a temporary mask mandate?Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
We have a lot of freedoms in this country. More so than most people on the planet. But we aren't free to do anything and everything one may want to do. There are rules and laws.
You have to pay taxes. Are you out there protesting that?
You aren't allowed to get drunk and drive. Shouldn't that be YOUR right? Why aren't you out there protesting for the right to drive drunk?
People have to wear cloths. I don't see you out there protesting for the right to walk around in public naked. Shouldn't you have that right?
You have to have a drivers license to drive. Why shouldn't you be able to drive with out one? Protest that.
What about the airport? Why should you have to go through this security crap to fly. Isn't it your right not to? Protest that.
If I want to drive on the left side of the road, why can't I? Isn't that my right? I am going to protest that.
I don't know how much masks make a difference. Logic says to me it probably does help stop spreading germs and a virus. Being this was a new issue (covid), until they figured out how to combat it, masks became required. When numbers went down they eased those restrictions. When they spiked again, they came back for a little while. I hate wearing masks as much as you and everyone. (Although provides some benefit at the blackjack tables). But really is wearing a mask for a few months during a spike in cases the end of the world?
Come on people...there are things in life you have to do. That is life.
And as for vaccines. There is no mandate. Anyone not wanting to get a vaccine doesn't have to. Last I checked some 40% haven't.
A few months is the same as over two years now? Lot of paragraphs just to say cuck lyfe lulz.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI can't for the life of me, figure out why some are getting so bent out of shape about a temporary mask mandate?Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
We have a lot of freedoms in this country. More so than most people on the planet. But we aren't free to do anything and everything one may want to do. There are rules and laws.
You have to pay taxes. Are you out there protesting that?
You aren't allowed to get drunk and drive. Shouldn't that be YOUR right? Why aren't you out there protesting for the right to drive drunk?
People have to wear cloths. I don't see you out there protesting for the right to walk around in public naked. Shouldn't you have that right?
You have to have a drivers license to drive. Why shouldn't you be able to drive with out one? Protest that.
What about the airport? Why should you have to go through this security crap to fly. Isn't it your right not to? Protest that.
If I want to drive on the left side of the road, why can't I? Isn't that my right? I am going to protest that.
I don't know how much masks make a difference. Logic says to me it probably does help stop spreading germs and a virus. Being this was a new issue (covid), until they figured out how to combat it, masks became required. When numbers went down they eased those restrictions. When they spiked again, they came back for a little while. I hate wearing masks as much as you and everyone. (Although provides some benefit at the blackjack tables). But really is wearing a mask for a few months during a spike in cases the end of the world?
Come on people...there are things in life you have to do. That is life.
You listed a bunch of rules. Laws to me are things like, stick your hand in fire and it will burn. I know many people that don't pay taxes. You can get drunk and drive but society will make you pay if you get wrecked. One has to decide if those consequences are worth it. I also know people that don't have a driver's license but still drive without problems.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI can't for the life of me, figure out why some are getting so bent out of shape about a temporary mask mandate?Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
We have a lot of freedoms in this country. More so than most people on the planet. But we aren't free to do anything and everything one may want to do. There are rules and laws.
You have to pay taxes. Are you out there protesting that?
You aren't allowed to get drunk and drive. Shouldn't that be YOUR right? Why aren't you out there protesting for the right to drive drunk?
People have to wear cloths. I don't see you out there protesting for the right to walk around in public naked. Shouldn't you have that right?
You have to have a drivers license to drive. Why shouldn't you be able to drive with out one? Protest that.
What about the airport? Why should you have to go through this security crap to fly. Isn't it your right not to? Protest that.
If I want to drive on the left side of the road, why can't I? Isn't that my right? I am going to protest that.
I don't know how much masks make a difference. Logic says to me it probably does help stop spreading germs and a virus. Being this was a new issue (covid), until they figured out how to combat it, masks became required. When numbers went down they eased those restrictions. When they spiked again, they came back for a little while. I hate wearing masks as much as you and everyone. (Although provides some benefit at the blackjack tables). But really is wearing a mask for a few months during a spike in cases the end of the world?
Come on people...there are things in life you have to do. That is life.
As far as I am concerned people can protest whatever they want. I have never protested anything because I do what and when I want. I seek permission from no one but myself. It just so happens that what I want to do tends to conform with civilized society. The last thing society wants is people like me protesting or whatever. Because if it comes down to it, needing to be done, then that's when shit gets barbaric.
Prisons are filled with people with that same mentality. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
And in prison, you don't get the bathroom of your choosing and making.
:D. You don't want THAT. Just relax. :cool:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJPrisons are filled with people with that same mentality. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
And in prison, you don't get the bathroom of your choosing and making.
Not even close. Civilization was built by people with my type of mentality.
This coming from a so called Republican LMFAO. You're a RINO like tough guy Nightmarefish over at PFA.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI can't for the life of me, figure out why some are getting so bent out of shape about a temporary mask mandate?Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
We have a lot of freedoms in this country. More so than most people on the planet. But we aren't free to do anything and everything one may want to do. There are rules and laws.
You have to pay taxes. Are you out there protesting that?
You aren't allowed to get drunk and drive. Shouldn't that be YOUR right? Why aren't you out there protesting for the right to drive drunk?
People have to wear cloths. I don't see you out there protesting for the right to walk around in public naked. Shouldn't you have that right?
You have to have a drivers license to drive. Why shouldn't you be able to drive with out one? Protest that.
What about the airport? Why should you have to go through this security crap to fly. Isn't it your right not to? Protest that.
If I want to drive on the left side of the road, why can't I? Isn't that my right? I am going to protest that.
I don't know how much masks make a difference. Logic says to me it probably does help stop spreading germs and a virus. Being this was a new issue (covid), until they figured out how to combat it, masks became required. When numbers went down they eased those restrictions. When they spiked again, they came back for a little while. I hate wearing masks as much as you and everyone. (Although provides some benefit at the blackjack tables). But really is wearing a mask for a few months during a spike in cases the end of the world?
Come on people...there are things in life you have to do. That is life.
kewlJ only thinks of himself and his current situation.
He is perfectly fine with jailing and executing homosexuals in Muslim Countries because it doesn't affect him personally.
It wasn't long ago in America that being a homosexual was a crime.
How much Government Control and Regulation will you swallow?
Some of us have drawn the line at Covid Vaccines and Mask Mandates.
Once again it isn't about taking a vaccine or wearing a mask.
90% of Canadians and a large amount of Canadian Protesters are Vaccinated!
It is about the Government forcing you to do something against your will and liberty.
Especially when they keep lying about the Science or completely flip flopping about it every 6 months.
None of us have a problem with all the other vaccines as it is your choice.
Yes, when the Government fines you 4,000 dollars for not taking a shot you are being forced.
When the Government says you can't keep your job, apply for a job or shop at Home Depot and Walmart without 2 shots and a booster you are being Forced.
I refuse to shop at Albertson's until they lift their Company Mask Mandate as the State of Nevada just did.
I'd rather shop elsewhere but Albertson's is literally a block away but I'll be driving further at this current time.
I did just walk into a Home Depot yesterday without a mask and it was very liberating IMO.
Just the Freedom to choose is important as you learn by being restricted.
But plenty of other shoppers still wore their mask which is THEIR Choice and I support that!
Even though I do snicker at people double masking up or wearing their mask in the car while driving.
Most likely, when I go into a Casino, I will wear a large mask that covers most of my face.
I learned this tactic from DarkOz.
And it is nice to pick and choose where and when I want to wear a mask.
Even though the reason has nothing to do with airborne viruses.
Here's a typical example of Today's Republican:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
https://mobile.twitter.com/crazykare...40253181517826
Not surprisingly, this dizzy bitch is running for elected office ... in Florida.
If someone's mouth has been in the places kew's mouth has been, they would favor mask-wearing also.
Come on mate, I am not fine with prosecution of any group, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation ect. Don't be ridiculous.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
It also wasn't that long that blacks like Rob were slaves in this country. But guess what, I live in 2022.
You say the science is flip flopping every 6 months. To some degree, yes. This is a new situation. They are learning new things all the time and re-evaluating. THAT is what science is. Science, math, new technology. I believe in this stuff. Without it, you chose to be Amish and plow your fields by horse. It is 2022, my friend. Embrace it and stop living in the past.
You colored folks crack me up. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Logically, wouldn't a mask interfere with oral gratification?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Why would a gay man (or a woman who enjoys fellatio) ever WANT to wear a mask?
Does not compute.
But then again, you might have a recurring smegma / head cheese problem and a long-suffering wife who complains unsuccessfully about it, so there could be that.
*old joke* "Nixon saw "Deep Throat" three times, but he hasn't gotten it down Pat yet."
ba da bing, ba da boom.
eewww! Too much. Too far. Too gross, MrV. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Rob always comes back to some sort of gay comment/attack. Same as Moses, Mdawgs and most others that attack me. They are obsessed with who I choose to love, have sex with, share my life with, as many of you (not all) that call yourselves "republican" seem to be. All of the guys on several forums that attack my sexuality either call themselves republicans or espouse republican/Trump views. Freedom, freedom freedom. Where is your freedom on who a person can love?
Big time Hypocrits!
So now kew claims that MATH is ever-changing....like technology.
No wonder he loses all the time and needs to concoct an internet life.
Sounds like he's in need of more head cheese.
Faggots who lick each other's ass for "fun" deserve every bit of urine that comes their way.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I don't know what kind of gay porn you watch old man. :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
But just like everything else, you have a very distorted view of reality.
Should we tolerate the unvaccinated? - Justin Trudeau -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6i72czkSUsM
Do I? Word is you even asked for the vaccination in your ass. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI don't know what kind of gay porn you watch old man. :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
But just like everything else, you have a very distorted view of reality.
Testing..
SWEET.
JUST GOT THIS BOOK IN THE MAIL. WILL BE SHARING PASSAGES WITH ALL THE SHARPS INORDER TO CRUSH.
Machine telepathy > all this bullshit AP stuff
How much time do you spend thinking about me, my ass, my sex life? It is just beyond creepy, dude.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Menstrual Irregularities Cases After mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine - EMA Reviews Cases
https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/me...-february-2022
Probably hard to sleep when the wind is shaking the camper around.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJHow much time do you spend thinking about me, my ass, my sex life? It is just beyond creepy, dude.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
The new thing now is telling the vaxxed that their positive HIV tests are fake news......RIPQuote:
Originally Posted by monet
The engine won't run so he has it on jackstands. Kewl went by and took pictures. It doesn't shake. Ok little setup Rob has there.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenProbably hard to sleep when the wind is shaking the camper around.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJHow much time do you spend thinking about me, my ass, my sex life? It is just beyond creepy, dude.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
My estimation is it is actually better than my parent's basement.
Dumb. Campers don't have engines. And it's stored in Carson City.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionThe engine won't run so he has it on jackstands. Kewl went by and took pictures. It doesn't shake. Ok little setup Rob has there.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenProbably hard to sleep when the wind is shaking the camper around.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
My estimation is it is actually better than my parent's basement.
I have that same book you do...packed away in my safe with all 32 firearms (oops--33 now; just added the Taurus Judge). There's also a 2nd book when you finish that one.
I get kew's infatuation with me: I don't have aids like his sugar-daddy-fatty had. So to him of course, on a scale of 1-10, I'm a solid 9-1/2.
I really shouldn't get into this, but I would like to hear your thoughts when you have read through the whole book. Several weeks ago, you sounded like you were going into it with an open mind. Even criticized me for speaking bad about the book when I hadn't read it. :rolleyes: I don't know how much you have read but you sound a little less "open-minded" right now. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
SWEET.
JUST GOT THIS BOOK IN THE MAIL. WILL BE SHARING PASSAGES WITH ALL THE SHARPS INORDER TO CRUSH.
Machine telepathy > all this bullshit AP stuff
And while your criticism of me for an opinion on a book I hadn't read was somewhat fair, I have heard enough of Rob's interviews (with Alan), read one with Shackleford and read way to much of his comments on this forum on the topic.
I am NOT talking about the double up bug claim, specifically his other claims in which he claims to have won hundreds of thousands over a number of years. It is all voodoo concepts, like progressive wagering, stop limits, "special players", short term variance duplicated over and over (equaling long-term wins), hot machines...which gets into machines teleporting information to the player, and various other voodoo degenerate gambling concepts stacked on top of one another, as if stacking multiple negative ideas and concepts somehow makes it a positive play?? :confused:
Rob's ideas are really a who's who of voodoo gambling concepts, right down to his allegations that the machines aren't random, which as he explains it would violate the laws of every gambling jurisdiction, including Nevada.
So since I haven't read either book and have no intention to, I would like to hear your thoughts and if I am missing something and maybe not giving Rob credit where some is due.
You are so pathetic. You make claims that can't be. Claims of -EV play where you win big long-term that defy math. I challenge those claims because they defy math and you attack me on a personal level because that is all you can do. You have no legitimate answer to those legitimate challenges.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Now in sharing some of my experiences and journey, I also have made some claims about amounts won. My claims are 100% backed up by math. I tell you what slim advantage I have, how much I play and that equals the range of my claims (most years). I also share some of the techniques I use, some very common, some despite what you say, that you won't find in any book, like tracking two tables, and spreading both ways, showing spread once before exiting and a few other I have kept to myself. You can't legitimately challenge my claims based on the math so again, you attack me on a personal level, attack my life, my sexuality, members of my family. This has been going on for years and it really is pathetic. It is the behavior of a small, insecure, nasty human being.
And now for the last year others on other forums are following your lead, even embracing you. My challenges of Mdawg and Moses where both about math and the reality of how Las Vegas and in the case of Moses, Reno works. Legitimate challenges. And now both have followed your lead and attack me back on a personal level because that is all they can do. They can't legitimately answer the legitimate challenges. It really is a pathetic game and it all comes back to you, Rob. What a small, pathetic dude you are.
waa....waa....waa....Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJYou are so pathetic. You make claims that can't be. Claims of -EV play where you win big long-term that defy math. I challenge those claims because they defy math and you attack me on a personal level because that is all you can do. You have no legitimate answer to those legitimate challenges.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Now in sharing some of my experiences and journey, I also have made some claims about amounts won. My claims are 100% backed up by math. I tell you what slim advantage I have, how much I play and that equals the range of my claims (most years). I also share some of the techniques I use, some very common, some despite what you say, that you won't find in any book, like tracking two tables, and spreading both ways, showing spread once before exiting and a few other I have kept to myself. You can't legitimately challenge my claims based on the math so again, you attack me on a personal level, attack my life, my sexuality, members of my family. This has been going on for years and it really is pathetic. It is the behavior of a small, insecure, nasty human being.
And now for the last year others on other forums are following your lead, even embracing you. My challenges of Mdawg and Moses where both about math and the reality of how Las Vegas and in the case of Moses, Reno works. Legitimate challenges. And now both have followed your lead and attack me back on a personal level because that is all they can do. They can't legitimately answer the legitimate challenges. It really is a pathetic game and it all comes back to you, Rob. What a small, pathetic dude you are.
Please post where I criticized you in regards to this book. I'm pretty sure you missed a joke somewhere if it happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI really shouldn't get into this, but I would like to hear your thoughts when you have read through the whole book. Several weeks ago, you sounded like you were going into it with an open mind. Even criticized me for speaking bad about the book when I hadn't read it. :rolleyes: I don't know how much you have read but you sound a little less "open-minded" right now. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
SWEET.
JUST GOT THIS BOOK IN THE MAIL. WILL BE SHARING PASSAGES WITH ALL THE SHARPS INORDER TO CRUSH.
Machine telepathy > all this bullshit AP stuff
And while your criticism of me for an opinion on a book I hadn't read was somewhat fair, I have heard enough of Rob's interviews (with Alan), read one with Shackleford and read way to much of his comments on this forum on the topic.
I am NOT talking about the double up bug claim, specifically his other claims in which he claims to have won hundreds of thousands over a number of years. It is all voodoo concepts, like progressive wagering, stop limits, "special players", short term variance duplicated over and over (equaling long-term wins), hot machines...which gets into machines teleporting information to the player, and various other voodoo degenerate gambling concepts stacked on top of one another, as if stacking multiple negative ideas and concepts somehow makes it a positive play?? :confused:
Rob's ideas are really a who's who of voodoo gambling concepts, right down to his allegations that the machines aren't random, which as he explains it would violate the laws of every gambling jurisdiction, including Nevada.
So since I haven't read either book and have no intention to, I would like to hear your thoughts and if I am missing something and maybe not giving Rob credit where some is due.
I will highlight passages and take pictures but it'll have to be when I'm back home to pick up the book + sitting around doing nothing.
Who knows, I'm honestly kinda curious. Rob is a talented writer and a hell of a troll.
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionPlease post where I criticized you in regards to this book. I'm pretty sure you missed a joke somewhere if it happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I don't understand this type of comment? At issue is not whether Rob or likewise Mdog is a good writer or good troll. Both are. Is that really the purpose of gambling forums to read someone's well written story of events that can't be? :confused: If so then what is the problem with 18 y.o.'s in a row or Mdogs claim of 50 consecutive winning blackjack hands?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
One of the forums that Mdog posts at IS a forum for writers, to share their "stories". That seems like the appropriate place for both these guys to share their fictional "tales", not a legitimate gambling forum.
I also don't celebrate someone because they are a "hell of a troll". Both these people troll and attack because they can't legitimately defend or answer for their claims that can't be. I am completely lost as to why there is a fraction that celebrates and encourages that.
A mask isn't necessary if you're wearing a mask. A mask wearer can wear 5 masks so the ones around there are accounted for. It's almost as if it is just unreasonable and something you cannot choose another alternative like oppression with no due process. You're guilty of being a germ spreader without a trial. You look at it as the famous poem where first they went for them and I said nothing and now they came for me, but at least I'm at the bottom of the list and I go last. I took the vaccine and think I've might have had gotten some degenerative side effects. I would have almost been happier dying healthy. I can't even buy nacho cheese in the store and you think this is about Covid. It's something much worse if inflation doesn't come under control.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI can't for the life of me, figure out why some are getting so bent out of shape about a temporary mask mandate?Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
We have a lot of freedoms in this country. More so than most people on the planet. But we aren't free to do anything and everything one may want to do. There are rules and laws.
You have to pay taxes. Are you out there protesting that?
You aren't allowed to get drunk and drive. Shouldn't that be YOUR right? Why aren't you out there protesting for the right to drive drunk?
People have to wear cloths. I don't see you out there protesting for the right to walk around in public naked. Shouldn't you have that right?
You have to have a drivers license to drive. Why shouldn't you be able to drive with out one? Protest that.
What about the airport? Why should you have to go through this security crap to fly. Isn't it your right not to? Protest that.
If I want to drive on the left side of the road, why can't I? Isn't that my right? I am going to protest that.
I don't know how much masks make a difference. Logic says to me it probably does help stop spreading germs and a virus. Being this was a new issue (covid), until they figured out how to combat it, masks became required. When numbers went down they eased those restrictions. When they spiked again, they came back for a little while. I hate wearing masks as much as you and everyone. (Although provides some benefit at the blackjack tables). But really is wearing a mask for a few months during a spike in cases the end of the world?
Come on people...there are things in life you have to do. That is life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by monetNo Twitter?Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
No Diversity Tomorrow?
No WoV?
No Fun!!
You're an obviously embarrassed hypocrite. You call out dawg for the 50 straight winning bj hands and Alan for the famous 18 yo's....yet you conveniently forget your equally questionable claim about being able to count two tables simultaneously. And no one cares what other "experts" claim is possible on that one either. It's YOU who claimed this concocted whopper, and as any caveman-or-higher level can very easily decipher from your mounds of online babble, you have neither the ability, the intelligence, the temperament, nor especially the discipline to be able to accomplish something as far-fetched as that---with your humiliation further exacerbated by your running for the hills when Alan tried to get you to meet up with him to prove that particular snippet of BS.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI don't understand this type of comment? At issue is not whether Rob or likewise Mdog is a good writer or good troll. Both are. Is that really the purpose of gambling forums to read someone's well written story of events that can't be? :confused: If so then what is the problem with 18 y.o.'s in a row or Mdogs claim of 50 consecutive winning blackjack hands?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
One of the forums that Mdog posts at IS a forum for writers, to share their "stories". That seems like the appropriate place for both these guys to share their fictional "tales", not a legitimate gambling forum.
I also don't celebrate someone because they are a "hell of a troll". Both these people troll and attack because they can't legitimately defend or answer for their claims that can't be. I am completely lost as to why there is a fraction that celebrates and encourages that.
Your problem is you "talk" too much, which is why you reside in the dumps. Admit it--at an age where you should be and should have been out there happily and excitedly enjoying life's experiences--whether it be thru travel or trying to be productive in some meaningful way or whatever--you choose to mull around in online gaming forums as you're #1 go-to/end-all "activity" as if it's a cure-all for the sour real life you lead.
But you ARE entertaining. I've said it before and I'll say it again: it's silly little hopeless twits like you that we used to love pulling their pants down and shoving them into the high school girls' locker room, where the "experienced" girls would laugh their cute asses off when they saw that little stubby you call a dick, while the gals who were shocked to see a naked boy for the first time felt bad.
Yes kew....with all the essays you've written about your failed life, you do radiate such an existence.
KJ, how come you let Spike over at Gambling Forums off the hook. He claims over and over again to beat roulette. And just today he said he seen red come up 29 times in a row. Shades of 18 yo's!! What are the odds on that? It's got to be in the billions.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
So get over there to Gambling Forums and straighten that fraud, Spike, out.
Don't need to write an essay, just one line. Rob's above post just proves his continuing obsession of me, complete ignorance of what I do and frankly his insanity with these bizarre fantasies he continues to have.
KJ. you are. a.hell.of.a.troll.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI don't understand this type of comment? At issue is not whether Rob or likewise Mdog is a good writer or good troll. Both are. Is that really the purpose of gambling forums to read someone's well written story of events that can't be? :confused: If so then what is the problem with 18 y.o.'s in a row or Mdogs claim of 50 consecutive winning blackjack hands?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
One of the forums that Mdog posts at IS a forum for writers, to share their "stories". That seems like the appropriate place for both these guys to share their fictional "tales", not a legitimate gambling forum.
I also don't celebrate someone because they are a "hell of a troll". Both these people troll and attack because they can't legitimately defend or answer for their claims that can't be. I am completely lost as to why there is a fraction that celebrates and encourages that.
You said you are totally against gambling frauds. You went after Singer and MDawg. Spike is a gambling fruad. Get over there and get to it. Whack his ass.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmKJ, how come you let Spike over at Gambling Forums off the hook. He claims over and over again to beat roulette. And just today he said he seen red come up 29 times in a row. Shades of 18 yo's!! What are the odds on that? It's got to be in the billions.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
So get over there to Gambling Forums and straighten that fraud, Spike, out.
Mickey, I don't take Spike seriously. I don't see where he is harming anyone as I see no one else taking him seriously either. He has always been a guy that just likes to say absurd things to get a rise out of people, like his comments about 8000 candles. I also don't see him attack people very personally that legitimately question anything he says. He is just a guy playing on the forums, hurting no one.
I am not the gambling fraud police mickey. I don't search and seek out these kinds of people. But if I happen to participate on a forum where someone continually makes these kinds of ridiculous claims, I will say something.
Now why is it that you seem to want me to get involved with even more of these people? You tube, which I don't view, and now Spike? If you have a problem with any of them, free to say something.
And let's not forget mickey.....YOU invited me to this forum. When many of us exited GF, after bizarre comments by the owner, you suggested I come here, specifically mentioning Rob, saying there was a guy here making claims that were bullshit that I might enjoy challenging. I can't help it if you have since, reached some sort of agreement and done an about face.
And let me ask YOU this mickey? Why do you stay silent when Rob states that I can't track a second table. I am sure you know this can be done. It really isn't that difficult if the circumstances are right. You know people that have publicly stated they do it, or have done it, like Munchkin. Yet you say nothing when Rob tries to paint it as preposterous.
I respect that you have occasionally stood up and told the truth, about me, even though we don't see eye to eye on many things now, like you did, when Blackhole started a thread attempting to discredit me. I answered every one of his stupid challenges, explaining exactly what I did and how I do it. You said something like it was a clinic in blackjack card counting. And yet when Rob makes those same statements attempting to discredit me, you say nothing, because you have some stupid agreement with him. What is up with that?
I'll answer that. Mickey has no "agreement" with me. Liberals just don't like people who can use their own heads, and you in particular don't like it one bit when someone disagrees with what is mostly your bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
You're too dense and undisciplined to even contemplate being able to track two tables. And you expose yourself in this respect. Too many essays....too much babble....and far too high a content of bullshit. Munchkin doesn't portray such weaknesses, even with that gimpy voice of his which probably makes you reach for the soap when you're not taking a shower.
You constantly hide behind other names when this claim comes up. Yet you turned an interesting shade of yellow when you had the chance to prove it to Alan. Just like you chickened out of saying you'd come over here when I put the Newell up for sale. You always take the liar and coward's way out--keep hiding so you can keep lying. It's really what you do best.
You are too much. I'd love to listen to you talk to your friends on the phone. you MUST be flaming.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJI don't understand this type of comment? At issue is not whether Rob or likewise Mdog is a good writer or good troll. Both are. Is that really the purpose of gambling forums to read someone's well written story of events that can't be? :confused: If so then what is the problem with 18 y.o.'s in a row or Mdogs claim of 50 consecutive winning blackjack hands?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
One of the forums that Mdog posts at IS a forum for writers, to share their "stories". That seems like the appropriate place for both these guys to share their fictional "tales", not a legitimate gambling forum.
I also don't celebrate someone because they are a "hell of a troll". Both these people troll and attack because they can't legitimately defend or answer for their claims that can't be. I am completely lost as to why there is a fraction that celebrates and encourages that.
I didn't celebrate him it just is what it is. He will own your soul for all this forum's existence or until you die, Kewl.
Why on earth would I explain or show anything to Alan? Who the fuck is Alan? He has no clue of anything regarding blackjack and proved with his 3am blurry pictures of empty blackjack tables that he had no intention of being honest with this subject. I also am not, nor never was out to prove anything about the tracking of 2 tables claim. Most professional player know it can be done and have employed this technique from time to time when circumstances are right. You people always think I have some desire to prove something to someone. I don't. The truth is I am better off if people don't believe anything I say. I just share some of my experiences, and people can believe whatever they like. And it is funny, AP's who play at least some blackjack rarely question anything I say, because they know. It is only people like you and Alan that don't have a clue, that think you are entitled to proof. :rolleyes: I think Moses was the one AP that ever questioned anything I do, and he has all but revealed he really isn't much if anything of an AP.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Now back to the "Never was Newell". You have a lot of revisionist history going on here. I never agreed to come see the RV. There was a brief moment at the beginning that MaxPen and Axelwolf were considering riding down to Pheonix and I thought I might tag along for fun, but as you always do, you made sure that wouldn't happen by placing last minute stipulations you knew would not be met.
Later when MaxPen threatened to come, you did the same thing, putting in some last second stipulation that he show you his license. You only did this because you knew he would never agree. We have seen what happens when one of you trolls and haters gets information on a real AP, with this Mdog character. You knew Maxpen would never agree to this.
Now here is how things went down in the real world. Despite that the "Never was Newell" was supposedly in Pheonix most of the year, only 300 miles from several people who reside in Las Vegas, you discouraged anyone who was interested (MaxPen) with last second stipulations that you knew would not be acceptable. AT lease one occasion it was right in Las Vegas, and yet, you never mentioned it until you were gone. The reason: There was no Newell. You were in a small camper pull behind not the "Never was fantasy Newell"
The times I remember you saying people could come take a look were when the "Never was Newell" was supposedly over 800 miles away in Colorado, because you knew no one would make that drive. Then at the end, you said people could come see it in Pheonix, because it was for sale, but miraculously it sold in less than 24 hours before anyone could. You aren't fooling anyone with this crap Singer.
Since you want to revisit these events, lets do so. At the urging of Shackleford and Dan Druff to prove something, you pulled the show room stunt and took, I don't know 3 or 4 pictures in a showroom of a RV, complete with the notorious squeegee. Several months later, when you were supposedly on the road, you took 2 pictures of the outside of the RV, which did not even match the RV in the showroom.
And when it came time for this fantasy sale of the "Never was Newell", you took out an ad in the RV paper, in which you paid for 20 pictures and yet you posted 2 pictures.....the same two pictures you had shown when you snuck up on someone else's RV in the RV park. What person selling a half million dollar RV and paying for 20 pictures wouldn't post 20 pictures of their RV, hoping to entice some potential buyer. Give me a break! Like I said, no one is fooled by your trolling games.
Look, if you wanted to prove you owned this "Never was Newell", you could have done so at anytime, but simply posting new pictures, after the RV showroom fiasco was exposed. Pictures with a current days newpaper 2 or 3 different days, which would at least prove you had regular access to the "Never was Newell" more than that one single time on the showroom floor. Obviously, you didn't and couldn't do that.
Like I said, you aren't fooling anyone. Maybe you had a good run as a gambling forum troll, with your stories, but people can see your moves coming a mile away now. And having been thoroughly exposed....through your own doing.....all you have left is to try to revise history and hope it flies.
I guess you took this name "singer" to mock a real VP professional player, Bob Dancer who you were jealous of. And at WoV, you had a long running sock puppet (supporter) named Jerry Logan. Let's just put the two together and from now on call you Jerry Springer. :rolleyes: Because that is what you are a clown.
If kewlj was to get an honorary doctorate it would be in Rob Singer studies.
You forgot BanjoJerry :)Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
I didn't read this continuing neurotic rant by kew--nobody wants to keep reading lengthy on and on's when they have real lives to get back to. But there's no denying he's an expert at one particular thing, as tater makes clear: he sure knows how to make a fool of himself!Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWhy on earth would I explain or show anything to Alan? Who the fuck is Alan? He has no clue of anything regarding blackjack and proved with his 3am blurry pictures of empty blackjack tables that he had no intention of being honest with this subject. I also am not, nor never was out to prove anything about the tracking of 2 tables claim. Most professional player know it can be done and have employed this technique from time to time when circumstances are right. You people always think I have some desire to prove something to someone. I don't. The truth is I am better off if people don't believe anything I say. I just share some of my experiences, and people can believe whatever they like. And it is funny, AP's who play at least some blackjack rarely question anything I say, because they know. It is only people like you and Alan that don't have a clue, that think you are entitled to proof. :rolleyes: I think Moses was the one AP that ever questioned anything I do, and he has all but revealed he really isn't much if anything of an AP.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Now back to the "Never was Newell". You have a lot of revisionist history going on here. I never agreed to come see the RV. There was a brief moment at the beginning that MaxPen and Axelwolf were considering riding down to Pheonix and I thought I might tag along for fun, but as you always do, you made sure that wouldn't happen by placing last minute stipulations you knew would not be met.
Later when MaxPen threatened to come, you did the same thing, putting in some last second stipulation that he show you his license. You only did this because you knew he would never agree. We have seen what happens when one of you trolls and haters gets information on a real AP, with this Mdog character. You knew Maxpen would never agree to this.
Now here is how things went down in the real world. Despite that the "Never was Newell" was supposedly in Pheonix most of the year, only 300 miles from several people who reside in Las Vegas, you discouraged anyone who was interested (MaxPen) with last second stipulations that you knew would not be acceptable. AT lease one occasion it was right in Las Vegas, and yet, you never mentioned it until you were gone. The reason: There was no Newell. You were in a small camper pull behind not the "Never was fantasy Newell"
The times I remember you saying people could come take a look were when the "Never was Newell" was supposedly over 800 miles away in Colorado, because you knew no one would make that drive. Then at the end, you said people could come see it in Pheonix, because it was for sale, but miraculously it sold in less than 24 hours before anyone could. You aren't fooling anyone with this crap Singer.
Since you want to revisit these events, lets do so. At the urging of Shackleford and Dan Druff to prove something, you pulled the show room stunt and took, I don't know 3 or 4 pictures in a showroom of a RV, complete with the notorious squeegee. Several months later, when you were supposedly on the road, you took 2 pictures of the outside of the RV, which did not even match the RV in the showroom.
And when it came time for this fantasy sale of the "Never was Newell", you took out an ad in the RV paper, in which you paid for 20 pictures and yet you posted 2 pictures.....the same two pictures you had shown when you snuck up on someone else's RV in the RV park. What person selling a half million dollar RV and paying for 20 pictures wouldn't post 20 pictures of their RV, hoping to entice some potential buyer. Give me a break! Like I said, no one is fooled by your trolling games.
Look, if you wanted to prove you owned this "Never was Newell", you could have done so at anytime, but simply posting new pictures, after the RV showroom fiasco was exposed. Pictures with a current days newpaper 2 or 3 different days, which would at least prove you had regular access to the "Never was Newell" more than that one single time on the showroom floor. Obviously, you didn't and couldn't do that.
Like I said, you aren't fooling anyone. Maybe you had a good run as a gambling forum troll, with your stories, but people can see your moves coming a mile away now. And having been thoroughly exposed....through your own doing.....all you have left is to try to revise history and hope it flies.
I just got to reading this essay. How many words does it take to try to convince yourself of something....and then you even have to lie to do it!Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWhy on earth would I explain or show anything to Alan? Who the fuck is Alan? He has no clue of anything regarding blackjack and proved with his 3am blurry pictures of empty blackjack tables that he had no intention of being honest with this subject. I also am not, nor never was out to prove anything about the tracking of 2 tables claim. Most professional player know it can be done and have employed this technique from time to time when circumstances are right. You people always think I have some desire to prove something to someone. I don't. The truth is I am better off if people don't believe anything I say. I just share some of my experiences, and people can believe whatever they like. And it is funny, AP's who play at least some blackjack rarely question anything I say, because they know. It is only people like you and Alan that don't have a clue, that think you are entitled to proof. :rolleyes: I think Moses was the one AP that ever questioned anything I do, and he has all but revealed he really isn't much if anything of an AP.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Now back to the "Never was Newell". You have a lot of revisionist history going on here. I never agreed to come see the RV. There was a brief moment at the beginning that MaxPen and Axelwolf were considering riding down to Pheonix and I thought I might tag along for fun, but as you always do, you made sure that wouldn't happen by placing last minute stipulations you knew would not be met.
Later when MaxPen threatened to come, you did the same thing, putting in some last second stipulation that he show you his license. You only did this because you knew he would never agree. We have seen what happens when one of you trolls and haters gets information on a real AP, with this Mdog character. You knew Maxpen would never agree to this.
Now here is how things went down in the real world. Despite that the "Never was Newell" was supposedly in Pheonix most of the year, only 300 miles from several people who reside in Las Vegas, you discouraged anyone who was interested (MaxPen) with last second stipulations that you knew would not be acceptable. AT lease one occasion it was right in Las Vegas, and yet, you never mentioned it until you were gone. The reason: There was no Newell. You were in a small camper pull behind not the "Never was fantasy Newell"
The times I remember you saying people could come take a look were when the "Never was Newell" was supposedly over 800 miles away in Colorado, because you knew no one would make that drive. Then at the end, you said people could come see it in Pheonix, because it was for sale, but miraculously it sold in less than 24 hours before anyone could. You aren't fooling anyone with this crap Singer.
Since you want to revisit these events, lets do so. At the urging of Shackleford and Dan Druff to prove something, you pulled the show room stunt and took, I don't know 3 or 4 pictures in a showroom of a RV, complete with the notorious squeegee. Several months later, when you were supposedly on the road, you took 2 pictures of the outside of the RV, which did not even match the RV in the showroom.
And when it came time for this fantasy sale of the "Never was Newell", you took out an ad in the RV paper, in which you paid for 20 pictures and yet you posted 2 pictures.....the same two pictures you had shown when you snuck up on someone else's RV in the RV park. What person selling a half million dollar RV and paying for 20 pictures wouldn't post 20 pictures of their RV, hoping to entice some potential buyer. Give me a break! Like I said, no one is fooled by your trolling games.
Look, if you wanted to prove you owned this "Never was Newell", you could have done so at anytime, but simply posting new pictures, after the RV showroom fiasco was exposed. Pictures with a current days newpaper 2 or 3 different days, which would at least prove you had regular access to the "Never was Newell" more than that one single time on the showroom floor. Obviously, you didn't and couldn't do that.
Like I said, you aren't fooling anyone. Maybe you had a good run as a gambling forum troll, with your stories, but people can see your moves coming a mile away now. And having been thoroughly exposed....through your own doing.....all you have left is to try to revise history and hope it flies.
You know you're concocting just about everything again. My guess is you do what you always do and went back, re-read, and squirmed before spewing lies again. The Newell was sold 11 (that's ELEVEN) days AFTER I gave you the address to come over to see it. You changed that to one day because you looked like such a chickenshit for being afraid to come over and face me.
Your next lie is the pictures. You want them to be the lie that you say, but no one just "sneaks around" an RV park to take pictures of other people's property. And it's illegal to formally post pics of an RV on RV Trader if it's not a unit you own. THEY REQUIRE OWNER PROOF PRIOR TO LISTING THE ONES OVER $100k or $200k.. But you've already checked that out, didn't you. And you're as silent on that as the liberal media is on the Durham court filing.
Now to the lie about only a few pictures. I already believed I had a buyer and he was arguing about the price. So I tried to push him a little by showing I just put it on RV Trader. There was no need for a suite of pictures and if anyone else was interested we know Newell Buyers know a whole lot about them already. And no two are painted identically. He just didn't have the money so I made the right choice and a buyer from Az. snagged it.
As everyone already knows, all you do is concoct lies about yourself and those whom you are envious of online. It's what little twits do when they go thru a failed life that's littered with poor choices.
Well kew, I'm gonna make you breathe easier for a while. Instead of having fun bullying you and your life full of lies, we're taking off for the conservative bastion of Austin Tx. tonight to help our niece and nephew thru a tragedy they just experienced. So you now have carte blanche to freely babble and spread as many misleading "facts" and untruths as your diseased little heart can pump infected blood thru and handle. :) I won't be able to and don't care to look in to see who's insulting whom. But I'll catch up when we get back here probably in mid March. Redietz is on hiatus; I'm following his lead. (only MY sports bet paid off in a pretty way).