kewlJ

In general.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

The longer the UNKewl post, the more lies it contains.

---

but also, we have the contradictions galore, where one moment so many APs know him and have heard about his Brittle Bones backrooming episode (even the press has been calling him about it, lol), and he’s being begged to join card counting teams,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

There is a clear trend that has developed now. All of KewlJ's implied associates are turning out to be other invented characters in his years of lies. ...RIP

---

and the next,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I have little interest in meeting, teaming with and hanging out/socializing with other AP's?

---

he claims that he’s a loner who knows no one.

The ONLY APs who know UNKewlJ, know him as a fraud, who plays low end video poker and red green chip action as a cover for male prostitution, as an excuse for being inside the casino.

Whatever, dawg.

KJ lives permanently in your noggin now: sort of like an earwig nibbling on your frontal lobe.

Rob.Singer described it as the "gift that keeps giving."

In my case, just copy/paste a few choice quotes from the past, and the resulting torrential flow of illogic and whining 10x multiplier responses from the FraudJ is enough to bring a smile to even the most inured with all of this nonsense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seedvalue

There are many different Advantage opportunities in casinos that teams exploit. Blackjack is just one thing.

---

That is fine. Except, that is not what is being discussed. You are changing the parameters of what is being discussed. It is not a pissing contest, discussing what you or others do. The comment by Soxfan was made about me and my brother. "Why we don't play the same table". It wasn't about you or what you do, or what others do or what opportunities are available.

My brother and I are solo type card counters. I do a little bit of other AP stuff to supplement my blackjack play but 80% of my income is from blackjack card counting. And my brother it is even higher, better than 90% comes from card counting. And we are mid-level card counters that prefer not to travel much, so we play a rotation of casinos at one location, Las Vegas. So, I answered the question that was asked about our situation....why we don't play the same table. The answer it would be very detrimental to what we do and the way we play. It would not be conducive to continued longevity for our situation.

I didn't ask what you or other people are doing as far as team play. I have never asked anyone, for help. Never once asked some AP to teach me what he does. I decide what I am going to do and what is best for my goals. I don't need someone like SoxFan telling me what I should do, when he apparently knows little about what I do, how I do it and and what my goals are.

---

I’m not changing the parameters, and I’m certainly not going to wise you up. Team play at blackjack is still very profitable, and allows for a much longer playing career then going solo. Is that specific enough for you?
You aren’t well versed in team play because you have a negative opinion of it. Running AP teams is no different then running a business. If you hire the wrong people in either you are most likely going to fail. The process of hiring or choosing partners is more important then the details of the play.

Solo counters get 86ed all the time. If you remember a Dm I sent some time ago I spoke of a blackjack type game that you should check out. No need to make it public but this particular game I’ve had a team on for a few years. I stopped counting the number of solo guys who came through and got tossed. We have replicated our success in many stores around the country without much issue. Team play takes patience and long term dedication to be successful. Something these young guys don’t have. They all want it now so they burn out quick.

Sox just made brief comments he didn’t go into the details for you. Maybe you lack imagination in the real world, because you save it all for the forums. In any event you just don’t know what’s possible. That’s fine by me.

Actually if you want to have a decent laugh, and read a post from someone desperately trying to cover up his conflicting lies, click to read the entire post quoted below. Now that we know it was all bullshit, it's hilarious to read the post in its entirety, but here are a couple of its extracted turds:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

So after a fellow AP, in California no less, emailed me that he knew of this case, I decided to share details of the incident. It was then that a few AP's outside this forum convinced me that I should at least try work to a settlement.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

And then something broke that was going to come out that was going to be devastating to me. Information about me that would be public

---

Oh and let's not forget,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I have a friend who is a top AP in this town that is well known. Author of a top AP book, years ago. He has been to my home a number of times now and I have worked with him and his team a number of times.

---

versus

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I was recruited for teams at least twice. Another top, long running team claims they were recruiting me that I was not aware of. I turned down all offers.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

You have to figure about how after all these years of claiming that he has worked with this or that "AP," that this or that "AP" knows what happened to him here or there (including his lie about how various "APs" have contacted him about his fictitious backrooming incident after hearing about it), the only thing verified about him by multiple actual persons is that he has played a little red and green blackjack in the company of a sugar daddy.

THAT (to use an UNKewl introductory intensifier) says it all.

By now if there were any truth to any of what he claims something other than verification for his being a male prostitute would have come out.

---

Hey KJ...

I suspect you're following the baccarat coach's challenge thread at WoV.

You're pretty good at finding archived posts: do you have a link to the post the dawg made some time ago about winning all or most of the time?

Something about fifty in a row, or similar?

The tick-infested hound says "Where did I (or anyone else) claim to beat Baccarat every day of every week of every year? Where was this claim "to beat Baccarat every day of every week of every year" debunked. I challenge you to produce your proof, I believe that you are not being truthful here."

I sort of recall him saying something to that effect, or someone else saying he said it (hello, hearsay) but I'm not going to spend a lot of time looking for the original: but maybe you have it readily at hand?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Actually if you want to have a decent laugh, and read a post from someone desperately trying to cover up his conflicting lies, click to read the entire post quoted below. Now that we know it was all bullshit, it's hilarious to read the post in its entirety, but here are a couple of its extracted turds:





Oh and let's not forget,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I have a friend who is a top AP in this town that is well known. Author of a top AP book, years ago. He has been to my home a number of times now and I have worked with him and his team a number of times.

---

versus

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I was recruited for teams at least twice. Another top, long running team claims they were recruiting me that I was not aware of. I turned down all offers.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

You have to figure about how after all these years of claiming that he has worked with this or that "AP," that this or that "AP" knows what happened to him here or there (including his lie about how various "APs" have contacted him about his fictitious backrooming incident after hearing about it), the only thing verified about him by multiple actual persons is that he has played a little red and green blackjack in the company of a sugar daddy.

THAT (to use an UNKewl introductory intensifier) says it all.

By now if there were any truth to any of what he claims something other than verification for his being a male prostitute would have come out.

---

---

Dude you’re obsessed

Thorough.

Can I help it if recalling the minutest detail from however long ago is as easy for me as recalling my wife's first name?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Thorough. Can I help it if recalling the minutest detail from however long ago is as easy for me as recalling my wife's first name?

---

LOL

Given the way the world works, gotta wonder if that's a blessing or a curse?

But while I have your attention dawg, perhaps you can use your photographic memory to find and post the comment you made in the past that I am taliking about?

I don't think you said you won ALL the time, but there was a completely off the chart brag that raised my eyebrows and pegged my bullshit meter.

Let's cut to the chase...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Hey KJ...

I suspect you're following the baccarat coach's challenge thread at WoV.

You're pretty good at finding archived posts: do you have a link to the post the dawg made some time ago about winning all or most of the time?

Something about fifty in a row, or similar?

The tick-infested hound says "Where did I (or anyone else) claim to beat Baccarat every day of every week of every year? Where was this claim "to beat Baccarat every day of every week of every year" debunked. I challenge you to produce your proof, I believe that you are not being truthful here."

I sort of recall him saying something to that effect, or someone else saying he said it (hello, hearsay) but I'm not going to spend a lot of time looking for the original: but maybe you have it readily at hand?

---

I have only briefly looked at that thread MrV. I have been quite busy this week. One more day left in this 3 days weekend, the first of about 6 over next couple months and have been playing 9-10 hours each night. And then watching sports during the day because I am doing a lot of sports betting right now, and trying to get some sleep in between.

Mdawgs 50 wins in a row comment was made about blackjack not baccarat, I am almost positive. And that was shot down so thoroughly, even by Wizard I think that the hound even retracted it.

And as far as winning every day or every session, Dawg is clever in that he doesn't actually every claim that. What he does is post all these different session or days reports that are winning sessions or days and if you add them all up you will see all those winning days in a row, but he never actually claims all those winning days in a row.

What this means is that if he is just leaving out posting about Most of the losing days, which most suspect, he isn't actually lying. Just omitting the losing days and not painting an accurate picture. I will argue that leaving out all the losing days is a lie. The lie of omission. But as he is prone to do, he has covered his ass and should anyone complain about that, he will just go to Wizard and have them suspended. :rolleyes:

Bottom line is master troll is what this guy is. A wealthy, narcistic, loon and losing gambler that is comped nicely, that wants to pretend he is something else to try to impress strangers on the internet.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

"Where did I (or anyone else) claim to beat Baccarat every day of every week of every year? Where was this claim "to beat Baccarat every day of every week of every year" debunked. I challenge you to produce your proof, I believe that you are not being truthful here."

I sort of recall him saying something to that effect, or someone else saying he said it (hello, hearsay) but I'm not going to spend a lot of time looking for the original: but maybe you have it readily at hand?

---

Even early on in my session reports I reported of some losing sessions.

What sort of statement were you thinking I made? If you may quote even a few words of it, bzzzzzz cha-ching! I can call it up as far as exactly what I said. Finding the post though in order to link to it, given WOV's abysmal search engine, is another matter.

Thanks for clarifying, KJ: BJ, not baccarat.

Dawg, I seem to recall something about you winning close to fifty in a row or something like that; does it ring a bell?

Sorry I can't be more specific, but I am a mere mortal.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Even early on in my session reports I reported of some losing sessions.

---

THIS is simply a big fat lie! Every one of your dozens of trips has been a winning trip according to your reports and adventure fiction. AND every one of these dozens of trips has started off with 5-10 (or more) winning days before you decide you need to post about a loss to try to make it seem legit.

I remember one trip opened with 20+ straight winning days. I mentioned that (I think at Gambling forums) and then amazingly immediately you posted a couple losing sessions. :D Could not be more apparent.

This was one of the big tells (there were so many) that this whole adventure was bullshit. That is just not the way gambling works. Players, even playing with an advantage don't win every session (or close to it). They don't win every trip. They don't start every trip with many winning sessions before ever mentioning a loss.

THIS just is NOT the way gambling works, EVEN playing with an advantage. And no Casino, especially sophisticated Las Vegas strip casinos would allow that.

And one other thing goofball. You are NOT the "Pope of Las Vegas". You are quite simply a losing gambler that plays somewhat higher stakes (mini-wale level maybe) that loses and is comped accordingly for those losses.

As far as UNKewlJ,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

You can't get to the truth with a fraud

---

, and that goes for anything he claims about others as well.

As far as MDawg,

https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gamb...ow/#post825213

https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gamb...ow/#post825217

https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gamb...ow/#post825226

The reason I can't tell you exactly how many hands in a row there were was because I didn't count them.

I don't play almost every day like I used to pre covid (and pre some database issues), but if I go back a few years I can probably find a year that looks something like this:

160 winning days totaling $600k in winnings and 130 losing days totaling $520k in losses. Now what if I only posted about the winning days and just omitted posting any of the losing days, as well as omitted posting any running totals? :confused:

THIS is what Mdawg does in his reports. He posts descriptions and amounts of the winning days and almost no mention (very few) of losing days.

In his case because he is just a negative EV player, the losing days are more than the winning days, even with some things like loss rebates, which by the way only kick in when you lose. ;)

So he is posting winning days or sessions with no mention of the greater number and amount of losing days or sessions that wipe out the wins and put his totals in the negative. And he can claim this is not lying. I believe it still is.

And guess what. This is exactly why he gets all the comps he claims. Because he is NOT winning overall. He is losing overall and comped accordingly.

That folks is the great adventure of Mdawg. Wealthy guy likes to gamble. Losses (overall) and is comped accordingly. I can't wait for the movie. :cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

The reason I can't tell you exactly how many hands in a row there were was because I didn't count them.

---

THIS statement, I can actually appreciate and agree with. I have had many conversations with blackjack players discussing the most wins in a row. Their claim is usually 12-15 neighborhood. Every time this discussion comes up, I admit, I have no idea how many wins in a row I have had. It usually goes something like you win 7 or 8 and then start thinking "wow, I have won a number of hands in a row". THAT is when you would start counting. But is it 8? 7? 6? Maybe it was 7 out of 8 with a push which tends to be forgettable. Of course neither I, nor the other players I am discussing this with have the luxury of being Rainman, where they claim to remember everything. THAT only occurs in the movies and on gambling forums. :D

It is irrelevant anyway. Who cares. But any number above 15 is probably not only incorrect, whether intentionally so or just selective memory, but also puts the entire claim in the arena of 18 y.o. in a row meaning nonsense.

Anyway, heading out shortly. I can only hope for 8, 10, 12 winning hands in a row, especially with larger bets out. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I have had many conversations with blackjack players discussing the most wins in a row. Their claim is usually 12-15 neighborhood. But any number above 15 is probably not only incorrect, whether intentionally so or just selective memory, but also puts the entire claim in the arena of 18 y.o. in a row meaning nonsense.

---

"The marathon session lasted 12 hours and contained all the ebb and flow of a typical blackjack game. Until, that is, Johnson was able to string together a streak of astronomical odds — taking more than 40 hands in row, according to a source."

https://nypost.com/2011/06/12/the-ta...-atlantic-city

If it doesn't fit into his imaginary playbook, his mind recoils.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I have had many conversations with blackjack players discussing the most wins in a row. Their claim is usually 12-15 neighborhood. But any number above 15 is probably not only incorrect, whether intentionally so or just selective memory, but also puts the entire claim in the arena of 18 y.o. in a row meaning nonsense.

---

"The marathon session lasted 12 hours and contained all the ebb and flow of a typical blackjack game. Until, that is, Johnson was able to string together a streak of astronomical odds — taking more than 40 hands in row, according to a source."

https://nypost.com/2011/06/12/the-ta...-atlantic-city

---

Really??!! You are quoting the New York Post, a publication right there neck and neck with the National Enquire. :rolleyes: And even better an unnamed source for the New York Post.

How about you ask freaking Don Johnson if he won 40 hands in a row?

And by the way, there were probably a dozen sets of eyes belonging to Casino personnel watching. Don't you think one of those folks would have verified this? Even though the rebate was a bad deal for the casino and someone got fired over it, 40 winning hands in a row is just the kind of thing the casino would verify and probably put it on billboards and commercials. Hey come play blackjack at Tropicana and you too could win 40 hands in a row.

It is funny how coach belly is always there to push these ridiculous claims. Anything Singer or Mdawg claims. Belly: "sure that could happen". 18 y.o. in a row. Belly: "sure that could happen". 40 straight wins at blackjack: Belly "sure that could happen". And that despite it being a 47 Quadrillion to 1 shot. Quadtrillion!!

Something like the Borowitz Report is closer to the truth than anything UNKewLyingJ has to say.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

At this point anyone who thinks FraudJ represents anything truthfully or factually correct is a fool.....RIP

---