Printable View
Did anyone foresee that he would never stop campaigning? It's like everyone else but Putin is still an election adversary. This is what is so bizarre about Trump. It's like far-fetched talk is all he does. Does anyone in his family actually run any of their enterprises, or do anything of substance?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
09/25 - Rob you're disgusting. If I had the power I'd ban you, just as I did before. You and Biloxi should take an RV trip together. You belong with each other.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
There is no room for racism here, Rob.
If you recall Alan, it wasn't the trolling that got him banned.
I second the motion to bring back Rob.
I'd think you'd feel differently, regnis, if you were using your actual name and Rob libeled you. I mean, really, if you used your real name, and Rob said you weren't you, you weren't a lawyer, and you were making stuff up, what would your response have been?Quote:
Originally Posted by regnis
Dan, you'll look like a weak pussy if you let him back.
Alan, what is wrong with you?
This "love-hate" game you're playing went out in elementary school.
I am pretty thick skinned red. I don't usually let things people say get to me like that, especially on an anonymous board. On the other hand, I have been known to send some friends to "talk some sense" into people.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzI'd think you'd feel differently, regnis, if you were using your actual name and Rob libeled you. I mean, really, if you used your real name, and Rob said you weren't you, you weren't a lawyer, and you were making stuff up, what would your response have been?Quote:
Originally Posted by regnis
I understand your issues with Rob. But as I have told you privately you should have just ignored him rather than feed the beast. Probably nothing you did to prove yourself would have been enough or would have stopped the abuse. It just kept the conflict going. That is why you ignore it and it takes the fun out of it and the issue dies.
I was never a fan of the attacks on Arci relating to his wife's health and similar personal attacks. But I do miss the entertainment aspect of Rob and I do believe that he believes in his system. Also, compared to some of the other posters here, is he really any worse?
It's not a love hate game. Rob and I happen to be friends. We've been friends for a long time. We talk on the phone frequently.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
I happen to know that there are "two Robs." There is the "forum persona" and the real Rob. The forum persona can be a good guy or it can be a jerk. I am hoping he would be the good guy. But there are already plenty of jerks here, so why not one more?
That's the answer.Quote:
Originally Posted by regnis
Don't change your opinions on account of me. I'm just a dummass politard like all the rest. I jumped on the Trump bandwagon early because I had enough of career politicians, democrat and republican, that lie like hell to get elected then do whatever they want when in office. Americans are libertarian socialists. Taxation in any form is a socialist policy. So we all vary in our opinions as to how much socialism this country needs. I'm in the camp that says we have enough already. Lefties figure we don't have enough. And far lefties are really communists masquerading as socialists. The more the country tilts to the left the more they want it to keep tilting that way. They have been incrementally heading this country toward full blown communism for 100 years. Somebody has to stop it.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJThat may be. I honestly don't know much about Obamacare because it doesn't effect me or my partner. We get our insurance through the private market and have basically the same plan as before Obamacare. Since you have never steered me wrong, and probably know much more than I about it, I will assume you and the repubs are correct, it will crash and burn. So wouldn't the thing to do be for a bipartisan effort to fix it. Keep what's good and fix what's bad, in an effort to keep as many as possible insured, at as reasonable price as possible? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
It doesn't make sense to me that the greatest, richest country in the world can't find a way to provide reasonable healthcare for it's citizens when other countries are able to. Personally I think Trump and half the republicans are opposed to Obamacare because it is called "Obamacare". If it had not been called Obamacare and it's real name, the Affordable care act, had taken hold, They would be more likely willing to work on a fix. That is retarded.
Someone has to interupt the flow to the left. Trump is that person. I wanted to see what a person like Trump, so rich he can't be bought, and not a career politician, would do in office. I got my wish and I'm loving it. He doesn't act like a politician. The establishment politicians are well practiced at talking for 20 minutes without saying anything. He says what he feels. The establishment just does not know what to do when Trump tells them, both democrats and republicans to fuck off and die or calls them idiots. I love it.
Democrats don't want repeal and replace but they know Obamacare needs to be fixed. They want to keep the name. Repeal and replace came down to the John McCain vote. Snowe is positioning herself to run for Governor of Maine so has a half assed lame reason for voting no. I have Alaska history and hate the Murkowski's just like the rest of my family that lives there. Lisa's father was a stone cold crooked Senator and Governor that got exposed by Sarah Palin. But Lisa is right about Alaskan health care. It's the highest cost in the nation and Alaskans would get screwed bigtime without some kind of exemption. I can understand her vote.
Now we come to the great American hero, John McCain. What was his excuse? None. Nada. He knew he was going to be the deciding vote. It was his big chance to get back at Trump for what he (Trump) said about him during the election. McCain did just that. He might have been a hero in the sixties but in the 21st century he's a dirty little coward. When he stuck it to Trump he stuck it to the American people. But he didn't give a rat's ass. He just wanted revenge. In lieu of shriveling up and slowly dying from brain cancer I suggest he put a bullet in his head ASAP.
And only Rob Singer is banned?Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I can live with long winded diatribes, idiocy and lunacy. I draw the line at racism. I've not seen a racist comment here since the troll was banned and I think that was Dan's goal. I think Dan made the right call.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan MendelsonThat's the answer.Quote:
Originally Posted by regnis
In the military we had little use for racism, it's a cancer and we quickly stamped it out when it reared it ugly head. Maybe that lesson carried over to my civilian life, but I have zero tolerance for racist assholes.
So you recommend I send some people to "talk sense" into Rob? That can be done, you know.Quote:
Originally Posted by regnisI am pretty thick skinned red. I don't usually let things people say get to me like that, especially on an anonymous board. On the other hand, I have been known to send some friends to "talk some sense" into people.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzI'd think you'd feel differently, regnis, if you were using your actual name and Rob libeled you. I mean, really, if you used your real name, and Rob said you weren't you, you weren't a lawyer, and you were making stuff up, what would your response have been?Quote:
Originally Posted by regnis
I understand your issues with Rob. But as I have told you privately you should have just ignored him rather than feed the beast. Probably nothing you did to prove yourself would have been enough or would have stopped the abuse. It just kept the conflict going. That is why you ignore it and it takes the fun out of it and the issue dies.
I was never a fan of the attacks on Arci relating to his wife's health and similar personal attacks. But I do miss the entertainment aspect of Rob and I do believe that he believes in his system. Also, compared to some of the other posters here, is he really any worse?
The point is, I have people who think it's absurd (and an insult to them) for me to be on this forum at all. Their association with me is tarnished and degraded by Rob being free to make shit up regarding a real person posting under his real name.
Somehow, regnis, I do not buy the idea that if your name were under your posts, you'd be quite so magnanimous.
I don't know how you could even compare general quotes from Niels Bohr, one of the most famous theoretical physicists, to an internet scammer, but, and here come some more commas, the answer seems that the owner of a board has at least a moral responsibility to it readers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan MendelsonThat's the answer.Quote:
Originally Posted by regnis
Is Singer a scammer? It doesn't matter. His "work" is, at best, misleading, never-ending and self-serving. And, he (and Alan) provides zero evidence for any of his salient claims. In any event, you can't improve upon a doubling system by playing slots, and trying to stop for a while after wins. A million others have tried that, and none of them has consistently won enough to call it anything like a profession or new gambling system.
Personally, I don't care who is banned or not. I think it's better to first try to reasonably persuade people. After all, it's a sign of intelligence to help others help themselves. In the "old days", when gambling boards were sincerely full of life and good advice, people would show their support or disapproval for this or that by showing up or not showing up. Alan is the extreme of just whining about every little thing, and, I guess, the new norm.
I suspect Singer is still posting somewhere; if so, and if someone knows where that would be, perhaps a link to it could be posted so that the few idiots here who need their daily "Singer fix" can score and shoot up.
Leave me out of this part of it. I don't play Rob's way nor do I support it.Quote:
Originally Posted by OneHitWonder
You're relatively new here and we've been over this a hundred times. But if you still have any doubts about exactly what my position is about Rob's strategy read my report on my website where I specifically said it: http://alanbestbuys.com/id194.html
You know why he was banned. Dan said leave the racist stuff out, the troll gave a big, fat, middle finger to Dan and was banned. Saying FU to the forum owner and moderator is not a smart move.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan MendelsonAnd only Rob Singer is banned?Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Maybe he's going through forum withdrawal and leaning on you heavy to get him back here, but you are trying too hard to make the banning about something else.
Spot onQuote:
Originally Posted by Biloxi BillIt`s hard to tell if Mr Bojangles is upset because he feels lost on an island without Singer, or if he thought he would be the star attraction once Singer was banned and it didn`t quite work out that way.....hmmmm :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
I did leave you out of it. The reason that I wrote your name, there and further down in my post, as a third-party observer. You seem intent on answering stuff not asked just to insert more support of Singer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan MendelsonLeave me out of this part of it. I don't play Rob's way nor do I support it.Quote:
Originally Posted by OneHitWonder
My statement above is quite true w/o any explanation or other feigned help from you.
Singer can always come back as Jerry Logan.
Just to be clear. I am not recommending any form of violence or retribution here.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzSo you recommend I send some people to "talk sense" into Rob? That can be done, you know.Quote:
Originally Posted by regnisI am pretty thick skinned red. I don't usually let things people say get to me like that, especially on an anonymous board. On the other hand, I have been known to send some friends to "talk some sense" into people.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
I understand your issues with Rob. But as I have told you privately you should have just ignored him rather than feed the beast. Probably nothing you did to prove yourself would have been enough or would have stopped the abuse. It just kept the conflict going. That is why you ignore it and it takes the fun out of it and the issue dies.
I was never a fan of the attacks on Arci relating to his wife's health and similar personal attacks. But I do miss the entertainment aspect of Rob and I do believe that he believes in his system. Also, compared to some of the other posters here, is he really any worse?
The point is, I have people who think it's absurd (and an insult to them) for me to be on this forum at all. Their association with me is tarnished and degraded by Rob being free to make shit up regarding a real person posting under his real name.
Somehow, regnis, I do not buy the idea that if your name were under your posts, you'd be quite so magnanimous.
Although the thread relating to your reputation continued for a short period after Rob's being banned, and then mainly as it related to Alan's actions (or lack thereof), it has now died. I do hope that it did not in any way tarnish your reputation in the industry. However, I think it proves that had you ignored the attacks it probably would have died even if he hadn't been banned. Remember also that I several times tried to back you up on occasion and those posts were completely ignored on this site.
I hope not to find out if you are correct about whether I would be so magnanimous. But I probably don't offer up enough information about myself to provoke such attacks--at least I hope not. I also have tried to become less argumentative both here and in "real life".