It's not Singer's $1.2 million, but it will have to suffice

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Anyway, it's one thing to say I don't know, but for someone to sputter "it must be fake" when he has no idea whatsoever, is insulting. Not insulting to me, insulting to you. You shouldn't make yourself seem so ignorant.

---

Let me explain to you what you are missing here Dawg. You won't accept it but it is 100% true. When Axelwolf or any AP says they don't believe you, or their first response it "it must be fake", it isn't some shotgun emotional response. It is based on not one picture, nor one single thing said. It goes back to something I have said probably a hundred times on this forum, "it just doesn't take much to figure out who knows what they are talking about and who is just talking".

Someone says something that just rings false to an AP and we say "hum". The second time a double "hum". A couple more times, and there is no doubt in our mind. Pictures are no more meaningful that words. The picture worth a thousand words doesn't work here. All pictures do is distract for the most part.

Singer was just sort of stupid and desperate. He posted such stupid pictures trying to "prove" untrue things, it just completely backfired and brought him down. You, Mdawg are smarter with the pictures. You use them to "wow" people into a false sense of credibility. People see pictures of stacks of cash and chips and say "wow" what he claims must be true. Most APs and real players don't see or think that. Most of us look at pictures of cash and chips and watches and say, that in no way proves he won what he claimed. It proves only that he has or at least has access to money and no one was even disputing that.

Personally, I think you are an at least somewhat wealthy guy who gambles, so you have access to money and chips. It is the entirety of everything you SAY that raises red flag after red flag. Pictures can't and don't change that. All you are doing, all you have ever done is fool some non AP types with those pictures, another one that you happened to post today. And that goes for not just the pictures of cash and chips, but the suites and Forumla1 seats, the food, the whole shabam. It doesn't distract AP's like you think it does.

I am trying to think: Has any AP ever posted pictures like Dawg and Singer have done for the purpose they have done? I can't think of a single one. Anyone, anyone? Bueller? Anyone?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

The original W2-G issued at the time of the win by the casino is "proof."

I'd insist on seeing and inspecting the original as opposed to having an alleged copy posted online to look at (could be faked).

---

You haven't been paying attention. I posted up an old box of blank legit 3 paged carbon copy perforated W2G's. A typewriter or computer could easily fill everything correctly based on information on a $1200 jackpot and just add a few zeroes and a fake sig. Some places still use hand written W2G's.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I am trying to think: Has any AP ever posted pictures like Dawg and Singer have done for the purpose they have done? I can't think of a single one. Anyone, anyone? Bueller? Anyone?

---

You would have to Define exactly what an advantage player is. Would you consider someone like small cap an Advantage player?

I don't know what types of stuff Bob Dancer posts about regarding his play.


MDawg could easily prove he isn't full of shit to my satisfaction without ever meeting me or without any consequences.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Looking in my crystal ball, I suspect my average bet amount will continue to increase, which will be great...if I win.

---

I guess that I get the same kick out of the anagrams with gematria: you never know what you're going to get.

After removing XXX XX XXX XXXXX XXXXXX, and, next, my initials, googling the solution brought me right back to my doorstep. So simple that I didn't even have to cross the street. Ha.

Then, for effect, I googled "slot image about places" for a slot machine that spits out places on the map.

https://www.google.com/search?client...s=heirloom-srp..

The third image, the first with a word, is ...



I guess as well that Crazy Train starts, and ends, in Crazy Town.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

I have the discipline to stick to this method of play: it would be pretty easy to say "Fuck it, let's go" and shoot for the moon, but that is the door to crazy-town.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

I was much more impressed with reading how Bill Gates, then the world's richest man, played low level blackjack for fun and enjoyed it.

Contrast that with the dawg's tales of months of non-stop pounding the shit out of the strip casinos: not only is that essentially impossible, as KJ has so aptly pointed out, his brag also shows he is quite dissatisfied with his gambling experience, i.e. he can't stop.

Either he's a complete degenerate who bets big and loses big and then lies to make himself feel better, or as I suspect he's lying through his teeth, ala Robert, making it up for "True Passages."

Neither dawg nor Robert strike me as "Happy Campers."

---

Before Bellagio opened all the big poker games were at the Mirage. Bill Gates would stay at the Mirage and play poker. Of course, all the big time poker players were drooling to get him into a game. But Gates would only play $3-$6. LOL!

---

Mega rich people are for the most part very frugal. That's how they stay rich.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I am trying to think: Has any AP ever posted pictures like Dawg and Singer have done for the purpose they have done? I can't think of a single one. Anyone, anyone? Bueller? Anyone?

---

You would have to Define exactly what an advantage player is. Would you consider someone like small cap an Advantage player?

I don't know what types of stuff Bob Dancer posts about regarding his play.

---

Wow! are you trying to make it so I am universally hated by asking me to judge people? :D

I like SCG (doesn't he have a different screen name now?) I used to talk with him privately way back on Norm's blackjack forum. Lets just say, some of his "difficulties" don't surprise me. Dancer, well he is a guy that has or had an agenda. He was profiting from both sides. :rolleyes:

I suppose the purest definition of an AP is someone who only plays when he is at an advantage. Not a single round or spin, when not at an advantage. But that is not my definition. That would actually eliminate all card counters except those that only wong into games at an advantage, because most of us play rounds, including the first that are neutral or at a disadvantage. It is the overall play or session that become advantageous.

Additionally, while 99.something of what I do is at an advantage, I have engaged in sports betting for a decade. And until this year, every year was at a disadvantage, even though I had 1 or 2 small winning years among them. So by my purest definition some might disqualify me.

My late partner was even worse. When I met him he was a losing video poker player. he didn't play that often, a couple times a year but he was a typical losing player. Although I put him to work handing our machine advantage play, I am quite sure some of that former mentality stuck around. I never said anything, but some of our results weren't up to real expectation. Did he play a little too long after reaching what we needed to hit to reach our goals for future mailers? Probably. So I don't know that he was really an AP.

What about a player that does some things at an advantage and some not. I see guys like this at casinos all the time. What if the totality makes them a small winner? does that qualify as advantage player? I don't know. :confused: Same scenario, except instead of a small overall winner they break even (not playing for a living). They have flipped the advantage from the house to break even. Does that qualify as advantage player? I don't know.

I am not even going to say Mdawg isn't doing some things at an advantage. What I have said is his story as he tells it, just is not real. And he didn't help his caause today with that talk about emotions.

So, no sorry to disappoint but I am not going to define axactly what an AP is, and certainly not going to list who I believe is or isn't. That is something for each person to do. But that said, we all know when someone isn't. Blatently isn't. :cool:

How can we take anything you say seriously? Now you're going on about your "late partner" when you disavowed his existence not long ago.

Don't you realize what an utter Joke you are and that it's all your own fault?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Punkcity

You must have a mental problem as you just fail to understand that you constantly discredit YOUR OWN character yet claim others are discrediting you.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

At this point anyone who thinks FraudJ represents anything truthfully or factually correct is a fool.....RIP

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

The nineteen most major UNKewl lies I can think of concern (1) his lie about Moses showing up at a condo he claimed he lived at, (2) a condo it turned out that he has no ownership in and does not even live in, (3) his faking his own death, (4) lying about ever having been robbed, (5) the nonsense about MGM execs showing up at his apartment on Halloween to give him player records on someone who isn't even MDawg, (6) the backrooming lawsuit, (7) the lie about being doxxed, or ever having his name placed in any casino database, (8) the rigged shuffler, (9) $50. free play for $100K win on a slot progressive, (10) $50K multi hand VP hit, (11) winning a car, (12) the lie about never asking anyone else to prove anything, (13) the lie about knowing attorney Nersesian well or at all, and having him on "speed dial," (14) lies that made it clear that he has never filed taxes as a professional gambler, (15) fabricated sports bets, (16) lies about that he has calculated his exact "expected win" over a decade and a half period, (17) lies about the "oily" surfboard, (18) lied about whether or not he was gay, (19) the lie about even having a dead "soul mate" which he recanted.

That rigged shuffler story, besides not making any sense, reaffirmed in my mind that this guy really doesn't play much table games, because I'd expect such nonsense from a recreational player, not a card counter.

And as usual, as he gets hemmed in, he is changing the story on some of these. Even renounced the existence of his "soul mate" claims he lied about him and his gay marriage too!

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

That's where you're wrong. If you knew anything much about timepieces you could tell from the pictures that mine are real. Plus if you recall I posted a pretty long video where I even weighed some of the watches and again, anyone who knows much about the watches would know from the weights and appearances that everything I have is genuine.

The guy who says "no way to tell" is someone who knows little or nothing about timepieces.

Just go to some of the watch forums sometimes and you'll see someone come along and post a pic of a watch. Pretty quickly, in most cases, people know if it is real or fake.

Hmm, so if these watches, cash, rooms, chips, etc. aren't mine, how come they kept recurring like a bad AxelWolf nightmare over and over over the years. I must be renting the same watches :cool: for years at a time. Who is letting me strew all my vitamins and designer clothes all over his suites? :o How is it that I meet up with Wizard here and there at random, and just happen to have a couple hundred K in chips in my pocket most every time I see him in a casino?


Anyway, it's one thing to say I don't know, but for someone to sputter "it must be fake" when he has no idea whatsoever, is insulting. Not insulting to me, insulting to you. You shouldn't make yourself seem so ignorant.

---

I'd bet a lot of watch experts can not tell the difference of a first rate fake vs the real deal off a phone pic snapped several feet away and not focusing totally on the watch.

Who knows. Don't think there is any way to test this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

How is it that I meet up with Wizard here and there at random, and just happen to have a couple hundred K in chips in my pocket most every time I see him in a casino?

---

They are just sitting in your pocket?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I am trying to think: Has any AP ever posted pictures like Dawg and Singer have done for the purpose they have done? I can't think of a single one. Anyone, anyone? Bueller? Anyone?

---

You would have to Define exactly what an advantage player is. Would you consider someone like small cap an Advantage player?

I don't know what types of stuff Bob Dancer posts about regarding his play.

---

Wow! are you trying to make it so I am universally hated by asking me to judge people? :D

I like SCG (doesn't he have a different screen name now?) I used to talk with him privately way back on Norm's blackjack forum. Lets just say, some of his "difficulties" don't surprise me. Dancer, well he is a guy that has or had an agenda. He was profiting from both sides. :rolleyes:

I suppose the purest definition of an AP is someone who only plays when he is at an advantage. Not a single round or spin, when not at an advantage. But that is not my definition. That would actually eliminate all card counters except those that only wong into games at an advantage, because most of us play rounds, including the first that are neutral or at a disadvantage. It is the overall play or session that become advantageous.

Additionally, while 99.something of what I do is at an advantage, I have engaged in sports betting for a decade. And until this year, every year was at a disadvantage, even though I had 1 or 2 small winning years among them. So by my purest definition some might disqualify me.

My late partner was even worse. When I met him he was a losing video poker player. he didn't play that often, a couple times a year but he was a typical losing player. Although I put him to work handing our machine advantage play, I am quite sure some of that former mentality stuck around. I never said anything, but some of our results weren't up to real expectation. Did he play a little too long after reaching what we needed to hit to reach our goals for future mailers? Probably. So I don't know that he was really an AP.

What about a player that does some things at an advantage and some not. I see guys like this at casinos all the time. What if the totality makes them a small winner? does that qualify as advantage player? I don't know. :confused: Same scenario, except instead of a small overall winner they break even (not playing for a living). They have flipped the advantage from the house to break even. Does that qualify as advantage player? I don't know.

I am not even going to say Mdawg isn't doing some things at an advantage. What I have said is his story as he tells it, just is not real. And he didn't help his caause today with that talk about emotions.

So, no sorry to disappoint but I am not going to define axactly what an AP is, and certainly not going to list who I believe is or isn't. That is something for each person to do. But that said, we all know when someone isn't. Blatently isn't. :cool:

---

Just another story with details provided to help it flow. You can't make up if your Sugar Daddy was the primary mail guy or you were. You just roll with whatever fits from story to story and week to week....lol

Not so long ago you were the guy that didn't know WTF was going on with your free play pickups or what hand beats what hand in poker....RIP

This is also the guy you disavowed his existence when it suited your tales from the tunnels. So I guess no one should be surprised. :D

Exactly MaxPen. I mean the inconsistencies alone....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

which is why we got so many changing and bizarre versions of the same story.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

Compulsive liar is a fair assessment of what he is. If people go back and look at your last few stories they will see a trend in you always changing the story after you get caught lying.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Don't you realize what an utter Joke you are and that it's all your own fault?

---

Don't YOU realize what an utter joke YOU are, my friend (not really).

Gambling is math. Advantage play is math. You shit all over the math with your claims. You shit all over Shackleford, a math guy, by posting that crap on his forum. And then you go even further with weird claims that just is not how things work. Jack and the beanstalk stuff. Twilight zone stuff. Entertaining? I guess, some. To some people.

The fact that you continue to think that if you discredit me, or Axelwolf or any real player that doubts your story, it somehow equates to credibility for you, is beyond comprehension.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

How is it that I meet up with Wizard here and there at random, and just happen to have a couple hundred K in chips in my pocket most every time I see him in a casino?

---

They are just sitting in your pocket?

---

Yes. And I've shown them to him.

Usually it comes about by way of his asking me, "So how you doing at the casino this week" and I answer with a, well I'm up a lot and show him the chips. On at least a couple of the occasions we walked through the casino and I've asked the crew members I know to tell the Wiz how I'm doing. Yes true that particular crew knows only what happened on their shift the day before but I don't time my Wiz visits to coincide with the day after big wins, they are always set by his availability to go to the casino to meet me for lunch or whatever, not my availability.

Sure it's all anecdotal and random, but point being that I walk like I talk.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

How is it that I meet up with Wizard here and there at random, and just happen to have a couple hundred K in chips in my pocket most every time I see him in a casino?

---

Easy answer. You are a gambler. A losing type gambler. No one has ever doubted that you gamble at high stakes. THAT is exactly how losing players get great comps. :D My God...that is gambling 101.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Usually it comes about by way of his asking me, "So how you doing at the casino this week" and I answer with a, well I'm up a lot and show him the chips.

---

And we are come full circle back to this. How does showing Shackleford some chips prove you are winning? :confused:

This little statement is like a microcosm of your whole 5 year troll effort. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I'd bet a lot of watch experts can not tell the difference of a first rate fake vs the real deal off a phone pic snapped several feet away and not focusing totally on the watch.

Who knows. Don't think there is any way to test this.

---

Some stainless steel Rolexes are faked, as are other stainless watches.

Precious metal watches are almost never faked, because the enormous cost of making the case and band with precious metal far outweighs what anyone would be willing to pay for a fake. You can't fake gold or platinum because of its density, and even a cursory examination reveals whether a given watch is made out of a precious metal.

Fakes don't fool the buyers. No one pays the same price for a fake as for the real thing. Fakes are sold for a trifle, and the person buying it knows what he is getting. Anyone paying a large amount of money for a pre-owned watch gets it authenticated, and many of the selling outfits on the internet including ebay won't even allow a watch to be transferred from buyer to seller until it goes through an authentication process.

The only stainless watches I've ever posted pics of are of a few extremely rare vintage collectibles that are - as far as I know, never faked - and are worth far more than most precious metal watches.

One indication that a watch may not be a real mechanical or "automatic" watch is to watch the sweep of the second hand.

On a genuine Swiss watch, e.g. with a mechanical ETA movement watch, the second hand seems to move continuously, but on fakes with a quartz movement it tics every second.

If there are any exceptions to this I am unaware of it; I own some Swiss watches, they're fancy accessories; women wear jewelry, men wear watches (at least we older guys do: gen Z prefers phones)

Yes that's true V, but there are some OysterQuartz Rolexes, that were made in the 1980s and such. They tick, and are genuine Rolex.

Also, the better fakes have Japanese mechanical movement in them.

But still, these watch experts online you post a picture of a watch and within thirty minutes there are people coming along saying "fake" or "genuine" and posting their reasons. True, the pics need to be decent not fuzzy, but nowadays smart phones take very good close up pics actually.

You know what it comes down to, you can fake the watch, but you can't fake how it makes you feel.